[HN Gopher] Opting out of facial recognition at an American airport
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Opting out of facial recognition at an American airport
        
       Author : f38zf5vdt
       Score  : 28 points
       Date   : 2022-12-29 19:05 UTC (3 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (mas.to)
 (TXT) w3m dump (mas.to)
        
       | imiric wrote:
       | I applaud the effort to do this, but I think it's ultimately
       | futile. Facial and body recognition will be done to you in many
       | places, even inside the airport, whether you consent to it or
       | not. Insisting to opt out will make everyone else's job more
       | difficult, and could possibly get you on the "troublesome" list,
       | attracting even more attention to you.
       | 
       | I'm surprised opting out is even allowed at the US border. I
       | wouldn't recommend doing this in China or in other surveillance
       | states.
       | 
       | Unfortunately, it's the direction we're heading in. If you want
       | to be part of modern society, you have to accept this as another
       | price to pay. It's a defeatist mentality, but biometric
       | recognition will only get more sophisticated and widespread.
        
         | mindslight wrote:
         | > _Insisting to opt out will make everyone else 's job more
         | difficult_
         | 
         | Good! Overly worrying about the individual people functioning
         | as the low level tip of the spear is exactly what the people
         | creating/administering a system want you to do, so their agenda
         | can continue unquestioned. Rather, you should be friendly and
         | polite to the individuals but firm in your insistence.
         | 
         | > _could possibly get you on the "troublesome" list_
         | 
         | If one doesn't want our society to continue sliding into
         | technological totalitarianism, then one needs to not treat it
         | like a foregone conclusion.
        
       | zoklet-enjoyer wrote:
       | "As a genderqueer queer Korean I have always experienced violence
       | going through security. So this is an added factor I am always
       | aware of whenever I do anything against the current.
       | 
       | Sometimes I have to weigh the violence of my data being harvested
       | from me against the violence of harassment (physical, verbal, and
       | mental)."
       | 
       | I've never seen such a liberal definition of violence.
        
         | quinnjh wrote:
         | Im sympathetic to the authors experience of feeling scrutinized
         | due to gender, but it strikes me as odd that opting out of what
         | tiktok and instagram do to others constantly is a hill they
         | feel is worth dying on.
         | 
         | If data collection is violence, then walking 30 feet in any
         | major city of USA or S Korea must be ... debilitating.. for me
         | that requires that i calibrate my definitions of violence to
         | allow me to peacefully continue forward in our brave new world.
         | 
         | The alternative they suggest where we all "resist" as much as
         | possible seems difficult to get buy in on. Its like a prisoners
         | dilemma where most people will opt for "dont resist/ get
         | through customs quicker"
        
         | xen2xen1 wrote:
         | The left has learned well that changing definitions that make
         | everything look and sound worse is a very good ploy, and works
         | very well.
        
           | siquick wrote:
           | Let's not pretend that both sides of the coin don't do
           | exactly the same thing.
        
           | mindslight wrote:
           | I think you mean "social media addicts" in general - don't
           | forget about "lockdown", "stop the steal", "assassination
           | coordinates", etc. With shallow communication, inducing as
           | much emotional impact as possible is unfortunately the
           | winning strategy.
           | 
           | Specifically here, when talking about a situation designed
           | around individual agents readily exercising autocratic power
           | including physical violence, the word "violence" is quite
           | appropriate. Very few people would choose to voluntarily
           | unpack everything in their bags for a stranger in a public
           | place. This characterization is actually much more in line
           | with the standard libertarian critique of government.
        
           | [deleted]
        
           | dangus wrote:
           | How do you know this individual is a member of "the left?"
           | Did they show their membership card?
        
           | feet wrote:
           | >intentional use of physical force or power, threatened[2] or
           | actual, against oneself, another person, or against a group
           | or community, which either results in or has a high
           | likelihood of resulting in injury, death, psychological harm,
           | maldevelopment, or deprivation
           | 
           | https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Violence
        
             | zoklet-enjoyer wrote:
             | This part specifically "violence of my data being harvested
             | from me"
             | 
             | Biometrics are not cool but a photo is not violent
        
         | dangus wrote:
         | Some dictionary definitions of violence from Merriam Webster:
         | 
         | 2: injury by or as if by distortion, infringement, or
         | profanation : OUTRAGE
         | 
         | 3a: intense, turbulent, or furious and often destructive action
         | or force
         | 
         |  _the violence of the storm_
         | 
         | b: vehement feeling or expression : FERVOR
         | 
         | also: an instance of such action or feeling
         | 
         | c: a clashing or jarring quality : DISCORDANCE
         | 
         | Maybe the choice of language is strong but I don't think the
         | word is being used incorrectly.
        
       | quinnjh wrote:
       | now im curious what its like to opt out of Korea's SES biometrics
       | system.
        
       | sokoloff wrote:
       | I opt out of the AIT scanners every time. What's surprising to me
       | is that, in years of doing it, I've only ever seen one other
       | person do that (leaving Re-invent in Vegas). It gets eye rolls
       | from my family and sometimes from colleagues I'm traveling with,
       | but this small measure of resistance against more-invasive-than-
       | required search is worth the few minutes of delay to me.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2022-12-29 23:02 UTC)