[HN Gopher] 1491: New revelations of the Americas before Columbu...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       1491: New revelations of the Americas before Columbus (2005)
        
       Author : walterbell
       Score  : 53 points
       Date   : 2022-12-28 14:19 UTC (8 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.kirkusreviews.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.kirkusreviews.com)
        
       | andrewstuart wrote:
       | The Vikings arrived in North America in 1021AD.... long, long
       | before Columbus.
       | 
       | https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-58996186.amp
       | 
       | https://podcasts.apple.com/au/podcast/4-the-greenland-viking...
       | 
       | Or:
       | 
       | https://youtu.be/lmbY-GrM8pI
        
       | doitLP wrote:
       | The book is great but pretty old now. Can anyone comment on how
       | it holds up to new discoveries/advances in knowledge we've made
       | in the last 20 years?
        
       | thinking4real wrote:
       | "Native Americans were as active in shaping their environments as
       | anyone else. They built great and wealthy cities; they lived, for
       | the most part, on farms"
       | 
       | "He closes with a provocative thesis: namely, that the present
       | worldwide movement toward democracy owes not to Locke or
       | Newtonian physics, but to Indians, "living, breathing role models
       | of human liberty.""
       | 
       | Oh lord. Revisionists begetting revisionists.
       | 
       | I had a buddy in college who insisted that Natives were 'almost
       | as technologically advanced as europeans' and if not for a few
       | miscalculations in battle, would have effectively flung them off
       | and advanced to a society beyond our wildest dreams.
       | 
       | Of course, he failed to respond when I mentioned that there were
       | no modern weapons and the mystical technology he assumed to exist
       | amounted to little more than what Europeans had had for tens of
       | thousands of years.
       | 
       | It's really sad how much hyperbole gets thrown into the
       | revisionism of prehistoric civilizations. It's not doing the
       | descendants of these people any favors to make up fictitious
       | reinventions of their technological advancements.
        
         | justinator wrote:
         | _> "Native Americans were as active in shaping their
         | environments as anyone else. They built great and wealthy
         | cities; they lived, for the most part, on farms"_
         | 
         | These farms didn't look like European farms, but it's hard to
         | think of, for example: settlements in the Amazon being anything
         | less than a living, breathing, fruit orchard. The eastern
         | seaboard of the US had huge groves of nut trees, as well as
         | cleared out hunting grounds. The farms were just sustainable,
         | and worked within the environment instead of against it
         | (example: planting in a desert, piping in massive amounts of
         | water, and obliterating entire country-sized hydrology
         | systems.)
         | 
         | Perhaps what you are in, is "denial".
        
           | coredog64 wrote:
           | > example: planting in a desert, piping in massive amounts of
           | water
           | 
           | The pre-Columbian Pima had irrigation agriculture in what is
           | now Phoenix (aka "a desert").
        
             | justinator wrote:
             | Compare the pre-Columbian Pima and the contemporary
             | Americans and describe the differences in scale. You have
             | taken my sentence out of context by removing, "and
             | obliterating entire country-sized hydrology systems."
        
         | Symmetry wrote:
         | That might be revisionism from the perspective of the history
         | you get from Disney movies but I don't think Mann is at all out
         | of mainstream history here and I think you're doing him a
         | disservice by comparing him to your friend. I'd hope anybody
         | doing an american history course in US high schools these days
         | would know that, say, the Iroquois practiced farming though the
         | bits in 1491 about the way they burned out underbrush to
         | encourage large animals deeper into the forest or tried to
         | encourage Chestnut trees over others was new to me.
         | 
         | And people like Ben Franklin certainly wrote about Indians as
         | models of liberty, in his case in contrast to the Germans he
         | though were subservient by nature. And Rousseau certainly had a
         | lot to say about them. What ended up being the US political
         | system had many influences. I think the Corsican 1755
         | constitution is an underrated influence but also the lack of
         | hereditary nobility among the natives. I think it's easy to
         | underestimate how natural a nobility seems when all the
         | societies you know have it, until you meet one that doesn't.
        
         | krapp wrote:
         | You may be right about technology, but the political system in
         | the US and its Constitution was based on, among other things,
         | that of the Iroquois Confederacy. The premise that Native
         | Americans influenced the global spread of democracy by way of
         | US political hegemony isn't entirely revisionist.
        
           | michpoch wrote:
           | How exactly did you tie the US constitution to democracy and
           | then that to US hegemony influencing spread of democracy?
           | 
           | Democracy as a concept has nothing to do with US. US had one
           | of the first constitutions, but the concept did exist before.
        
             | justinator wrote:
             | The US was an early example of the idea of a democratically
             | elected government, and just so happened to come about by
             | fighting, then winning a war against not only a monarchy,
             | but arguably the most powerful monarchy that has ever
             | existed. Before that, democracy seemed perhaps a good idea,
             | but you're going to have naysayers who want to see a proven
             | example. Proven track records are why anyone listens to
             | anybody when it comes to influence.
        
             | anigbrowl wrote:
             | The answer to that question was in the first sentence, and
             | you could easily look up articles that explore the idea in
             | greater detail. Here is one: https://www.pbs.org/native-
             | america/blogs/native-voices/how-t...
        
         | yamtaddle wrote:
         | The argument that contact with and spreading knowledge about
         | Indian (as Mann settles on calling them, after evidently being
         | repeatedly dressed down by actual indigenous folks for trying
         | to use more currently-PC terms) societies and systems of
         | government played a major role in kicking off enlightenment
         | political thinking isn't so far fetched.
         | 
         | I don't recall his claiming that they had military tech that
         | was anywhere near as developed as Europeans, and most of his
         | coverage of thriving, complex, urbanized (by the global
         | standards of the time) societies in the Precolumbian Americas
         | is focused south of the Rio, for the simple reason that that's
         | where most of those seem to have been (though he does cover
         | Cahokia and related sites in the modern US, as well)
         | 
         | The closest I recall him coming to claiming Native Americans
         | were more advanced than Europeans was that Europeans simply
         | failed to recognize some patterns and practices as deliberate
         | and well-considered, as was the case with certain crop
         | management patterns in the Eastern forests and heavy use of
         | fire-as-a-land-management-tool all over the continent. But
         | that's not exactly a claim that they were more advanced. Oh,
         | and he does mention repeated contemporary reports that the
         | natives seemed remarkably tall and able-bodied compared to
         | Europeans, and makes some efforts to figure out why that might
         | have been (and some of that does tie back into government and
         | social structures)
         | 
         | I'm fairly sensitive to bullshit revisionism of the "noble
         | savage" and/or "ackshually Europeans were the backwards
         | primitives" sort, and didn't get either vibe at all from Mann's
         | _1491_ or _1493_. In fact he explicitly counters the former in
         | a lot of ways, similar to what you see in anti-noble-savage
         | works like _War Before Civilization_.
        
           | chrchr wrote:
           | Regarding military power, Mann does argue, IIRC, that the gap
           | wasn't as large as might be supposed. He also argues that the
           | conquest of the Aztecs and the Incas by small forces of
           | Spanish conquistadors was not enabled by military superiority
           | but rather by upsetting existing political balance. In both
           | cases, the conquistadors aligned with subjugated factions
           | within the existing imperial systems to overthrow the
           | dominant power. E.g., in Mexico, Moctezuma had captured and
           | imprisoned Cortez and his forces and could have easily wiped
           | them out. The emperor's delay ultimately allowed Cortez to
           | align with vassal states, and that alliance overthrew the
           | empire. That's not to say that the Aztec empire's military
           | was the equal of Spain's, but Cortez's small band of
           | conquistadors would not have defeated the Aztecs head-to-
           | head.
        
             | yamtaddle wrote:
             | Right. It's not that the military tech wasn't better, it's
             | that, given the massive logistical advantages of indigenous
             | Americans (consider what a supply chain looked like for
             | even a tiny European force in the Americas!), the role of
             | disease-induced chaos putting much of indigenous society &
             | politics into something resembling death convulsions before
             | many of them even saw Europeans, plus some straight
             | realpolitik "heads I win, tails you lose" moves from the
             | Europeans, it was a pretty minor factor in the whole thing.
             | _Just_ the weapon-tech advantage wouldn 't have been
             | anywhere near enough for the conquest to go even as
             | smoothly as it did, thanks largely to the logistics
             | disadvantage of the Europeans (and the conquest wasn't
             | terribly smooth, anyway--Europeans lost plenty of battles
             | over a span of centuries before mostly subjugating the
             | Americas).
        
       | Khelavaster wrote:
       | One of my favorite history books, as well as it's sequel 1493.
        
       | EdwardCoffin wrote:
       | The book was an expansion of the essay Mann wrote for The
       | Atlantic, and you can read that essay online [1]
       | 
       | [1]
       | https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2002/03/1491/30...
        
         | kerblang wrote:
         | Also recommending this essay:
         | https://www.laphamsquarterly.org/democracy/hiding-plain-sigh...
         | - in reference to
         | 
         | > the present worldwide movement toward democracy owes not to
         | Locke or Newtonian physics, but to Indians, "living, breathing
         | role models of human liberty."
         | 
         | Of special interest is the man Kandiaronk, a native american.
         | 
         | Edit: Just noticed Graeber is bickering with Mann in that
         | essay!
        
       | StevePerkins wrote:
       | The sequel "1493", about the local and global impacts following
       | Columbus' landing, is even more fascinating.
        
       | jussaying2 wrote:
       | Along the same, er, vein, check out _The Open Veins Of Latin
       | America_ - it 's a painstakingly well-researched and fiery book
       | on the colonization and exploitation of Latin America for its
       | resources, under the guise of "taming the primitives". It also
       | documents the attempts of the US in sabotaging popular, labour-
       | led/socialist movements, nearly always successful and often
       | involving the use of violence, all in the name of "fostering
       | democracy".
        
       | Mistletoe wrote:
       | I was walking in the New Mexican desert this Christmas and
       | finding painted pottery shards that date to a little before
       | Columbus arrived. It felt so powerful to touch something that
       | existed before then and think what their lives must have been
       | like before the arrival of Columbus and everything changing.
        
         | spaceman_2020 wrote:
         | I keep wondering how these civilizations might have developed
         | if we'd discovered them in, say, 1900 instead of 1500s.
         | 
         | Or what if Columbus did land on the American shores, but never
         | made it back to Europe, and the native Americans got their
         | hands on European technology and figured out how to recreate
         | it.
        
           | pxmpxm wrote:
           | > I keep wondering how these civilizations might have
           | developed if we'd discovered them in, say, 1900 instead of
           | 1500s.
           | 
           | (presumably unpopular opinion, people love to signal)
           | 
           | This honestly feels like mashup of "i think
           | colonialism/columbus is bad" signaling and that Africa is a
           | tech hub in parallel universe pipedreaming.
           | 
           | There's a pile of recently discovered cultures in Amazonia
           | and they're not exactly competing with NASA... which begs the
           | question why you'd expect anything resembling a hockey stick
           | progress for that hypothetical, aside from doubling down on
           | columbus bad thesis.
        
             | ss108 wrote:
             | "Columbus bad" isn't really a "thesis", it's a fact.
             | 
             | But yeah, it's against the evidence to think native
             | american societies could have posed any meaningful defense
             | or offense against old world countries.
             | 
             | Have you read 1491 and 1493. I have, and they are a couple
             | of the most eye-opening books I have read.
        
               | paisawalla wrote:
               | > "Columbus bad" isn't really a "thesis", it's a fact.
               | 
               | Bad compared to who? Whatever faults you'd lay at his
               | feet were not only _de rigueur_ for both Europeans and
               | Muslims of his time, but exceeded in many dimensions of
               | savagery by the indigenous cultured he encountered. At
               | any rate, disease and lack of immunity was far and away
               | the agent of the demise of the natives, not Columbus or
               | those who followed him over the centuries.
               | 
               | > Have you read 1491 and 1493. I have, and they are a
               | couple of the most eye-opening books I have read.
               | 
               | Have you read Rousseau? The man never met a native
               | American, and what accounts he read of their lives were
               | certainly exaggerations, if not fabrications. In his own
               | life, he was notoriously irresponsible. He fathered and
               | abandoned for the orphanage -- a death sentence in those
               | days -- five children. He was habitually leeching off
               | friends and nobles who were susceptible to his charms,
               | until he exhausted their patience and good will,
               | including by _e.g._ seducing their wives at times.
               | 
               | In short, he was a scoundrel, and he saw in the the story
               | of the natives something which he desperately wanted for
               | himself, but which wasn't there: the possibility of a
               | life free from societal constraint, obligations to be
               | decent, to use one's life productively, to be responsible
               | for others, to live morally. The man confabulated for the
               | natives a lifestyle free of the bonds under which he
               | chafed in France -- and we have been laboring under his
               | romantic "noble savage" delusion ever since.
               | 
               | I mention all this to say, anyone who would read about
               | the lives of natives would do well to read a little
               | Rousseau, then read a little about the man, and mentally
               | _subtract_ his influence which is virtually omnipresent
               | in all subsequent popular thought about natives.
               | 
               | TLDR; nobody wants to consider that the colonel may have
               | been the good guy in Avatar, and Sully a delusional
               | loner.
        
               | PicassoCTs wrote:
               | They most likely would have become insular like china and
               | stagnated similarly. Best scenario would be something
               | like a south vs north dual empire constellation, locked
               | into a cold war that eggs them ever onward.
               | 
               | But we will never know, because they did not produce a
               | culture that could compete. Even with time to prepare,
               | alot of these cultures abandoned advanced tech
               | (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Firearms_of_Japan) and
               | supressed the "foreign" as the local elites felt there
               | oligarchies threatened by those strange foreigners. I
               | guess the usual attempts were made to encooperate the
               | threat, by offering small kingdoms, slaves and positions
               | within the ruling religion. It did not really work out,
               | as disease crumbled the civilizations to dust.
               | 
               | The other "prepared" culture (north american indians who
               | met the vikings) did not take any lesson from that
               | encounter either, because the tales of strange boats with
               | christian raiders were not kept in writing and
               | information was not exchanged with neighbors, with which
               | they were locked in ritualistic inter-tribal warfare.
               | Which is the main problem. The lack of information
               | storage and exchange, due to a missing central culture.
               | 
               | Africa had the longest time to acclimate to western
               | intrusion, and did so by selling its own people as goods.
               | The few things they did take over were weapons (used for
               | slave trading and inter tribal warfare), the only
               | candidates for organized resistance was the islamic world
               | (who had writtings, a specialized labour system
               | (industrial precursors) and centralized structures), but
               | they were & are locked in by thee own cultural problems.
               | Only exception were the persians, which were and are the
               | france/us of the region.
               | 
               | The chinese almost colonized africa, but then gave it up
               | as a foolish endeavor, due to internal problems
               | (starvation caused unrest) which was mostly due to there
               | industrial revolution never reaching critical mass, which
               | was mostly due to centralized culture/geography
               | preventing technological competition aka harmony).
               | 
               | There is good fiction on the topic
               | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Years_of_Rice_and_Salt,
               | but you need basically a geographical reactor europes
               | eternal boiling empire pot, with a progress state saving
               | device attached (netherlands and england, some italian
               | states were the scientists fled towards and from), to
               | reach the critical mass. The ingredients were
               | omnipresent, but the permanence of the societal reaction
               | was hard to get critical.
        
           | e2le wrote:
           | They would still likely suffer heavy losses due to disease
           | and infection they have no immunity for.
        
           | mathattack wrote:
           | The outcome is the same. They lacked our weapons and
           | immunizations- it would have been hard to catch up in
           | parallel with the Western world. Look at Japan in the 1850s.
           | The isolation of the prior few centuries hurt them.
        
             | ertian wrote:
             | Japan is still and independent country full of Japanese
             | people, who held their own against Western militaries
             | within decades of opening. That's a _very_ different from
             | the apocalyptic collapse followed by replacement of the New
             | World.
             | 
             | Of course, there's a huge difference between the two: Japan
             | always had some contact with the Old World, and with Old
             | World diseases in particular. America would probably have
             | faced the same wave of disease, even if discovery had
             | happened much later.
        
             | throw_pm23 wrote:
             | Were there any positive effects of the long isolation in
             | the case of Japan?
        
               | credit_guy wrote:
               | In an indirect way. (warning: following is highly
               | speculative)
               | 
               | - being isolated made Japan backward. Also, Japan does
               | not have natural resources, and is not an agricultural
               | powerhouse. This meant Japan was not a juicy target for
               | the colonial powers.
               | 
               | - Still, given enough time, one of them would surely have
               | snatched it
               | 
               | - Japan figured out the point above, and decided to not
               | become a colony. It industrialized at a furious pace
               | until it became a half-decent military power
               | 
               | - huge stroke of luck, or something else, but Japan
               | destroys a Russian fleet at Tsushima in 1905, and
               | leapfrogs into the ranks of Great Powers
               | 
               | - they further gain a lot in WW1 by sitting on the
               | sidelines, and eventually joining the winning side
               | 
               | - this goes to their head, and they proceed to do the
               | most foolish thing at Perl Harbor, and pick a fight with
               | the 800 pound gorilla
               | 
               | - this fight does not go well, predictably, so Japan ends
               | up under US occupation for 7 years
               | 
               | - another huge stroke of luck: US, instead of sending
               | Japan back to the stone age in retribution, decides to
               | help Japan rebuild, and pumps massive amounts of aid
               | 
               | - Japan goes through a second incredibly fast bout of
               | industrialization
               | 
               | This story ends around 1990.
        
               | themaninthedark wrote:
               | Sister comment was made about Tsushima
               | 
               | >- this goes to their head, and they proceed to do the
               | most foolish thing at Perl Harbor, and pick a fight with
               | the 800 pound gorilla
               | 
               | We in the US knew we would be getting involved in the war
               | and had done things like oil embargo/trade disruption.
               | The reason Japan attacked Pearl Harbor was because
               | Yamamoto thought the only chance they stood against the
               | US was to win such a decisive battle that we would not be
               | able to fight them. He was trying this again at Midway(I
               | believe) but we had broken their Coms so we were able to
               | out maneuver them.
               | 
               | Edit Add: As to if their isolation was helpful or not, I
               | think that it allowed them to preserve and strengthen
               | their culture both the good and bad aspects of it.
               | 
               | I think that if a country was to close themselves off and
               | turn inward, it could result in good things as long as
               | they have an internal forces that prevents stagnation.
               | 
               | Or to put it another way, progress only seems to happen
               | when there are driving forces, such as competing groups.
               | A strong government i.e. Dictator by nature has to wield
               | control in order to stay in power, in doing so any
               | competing groups must be eliminated as they a a threat to
               | power. This brings about stagnation.
        
               | pasabagi wrote:
               | > huge stroke of luck, or something else .. Tsushima
               | 
               | This is very much underselling how outclassed the
               | Russians were on every level of this engagement, except
               | in terms of sheer number of ships (they had more), and
               | technology, which was roughly on par.
               | 
               | I think the 'isolation' was pretty advantageous in the
               | sense that they managed to preserve their governmental
               | and cultural structures for a very long time without the
               | disruptive influence of western money and might. I
               | imagine if they had let the Europeans in, the eventual
               | fall of the Shogunate, partly caused by a proxy war
               | between the French and the British (who supported
               | different Daimyo), partly caused by public
               | dissatisfaction about foreign incursion, would have been
               | much earlier.
               | 
               | That would have put them in a much less coherent and
               | consequently weaker postion to resist European
               | colonization efforts in the modern era.
        
           | paisawalla wrote:
           | You may enjoy "The Years of Rice and Salt," by Kim Stanley
           | Robinson.
        
         | hirundo wrote:
         | It has surprised me that the majority of pottery shards I find
         | in the New Mexico desert are painted. The unpainted ones are
         | the exceptions. So these must not have been special ceremonial
         | pots, but for every day use. The fact that the pueblo people
         | put such a high value on decoration for everyday objects is
         | fascinating. I think of aboriginals as utilitarians struggling
         | to survive. But if you're taking the time to decorate normal
         | pots, survival must be relatively assured.
         | 
         | I'd like to exchange lives with someone who made those pots for
         | a for a few weeks, and compare notes. I wonder if I have more
         | or less free time than they do.
        
           | comte7092 wrote:
           | >I think of aboriginals as utilitarians struggling to
           | survive.
           | 
           | Grouping all pre Colombian Native Americans into one bucket
           | is akin to talking about "Africa" as one indistinguishable
           | place today. There was a massive diversity of societies and
           | cultures that spanned the continent with trading networks
           | that crisscrossed the continent as well.
           | 
           | Most European account of initial contact tend to describe a
           | life of relative abundance, people certainly weren't
           | struggling to survive any more than your average 15th century
           | European.
        
         | themantra514 wrote:
         | Pottery, painted pottery, and mycelium derived materials are
         | all the craze nowadays because it's "green & organic" etc.
         | 
         | It would be interesting to consider other aspects from pre-
         | Columbus times that we should consider integrating in our daily
         | life.
        
       | botswana99 wrote:
       | This really shook up my worldview when I read it. American
       | history as told in my schooling was about a vast empty with an
       | occasional violent native.
       | 
       | This is not what happened
       | 
       | I read this book twice. I recommend 1493 and his latest book
       | 'wizard and prophet' as well. His twitter is also interesting
        
         | dr_dshiv wrote:
         | What's the bit about the Aztec and Mayans not having Markets?
        
         | theironhammer wrote:
         | [dead]
        
         | russdill wrote:
         | Given that European epidemics literally decimated the native
         | population and the military marched many of the remaining
         | natives to reservations that is the reality that most settlers
         | encountered.
        
         | Tagbert wrote:
         | In my American schools we did learn more about North American
         | natives though it was often through the point of view of
         | European explorers and colonists. We got the usual stories
         | about interactions with Jamestown/Pocahontas and Mayflower
         | colonists /Squanto. There was more about Ponce de Leon and
         | Coronado and the peoples they encountered. We got more details
         | about the Aztec, Maya, and Olmec. I also remember sections
         | about the mound builders and the Iroquois Confederacy. There
         | were lessons on the American westward expansion and the
         | conflicts that caused though I suspect that was downplayed a
         | bit. The only South American people we studied were the Inca.
         | 
         | Obviously that misses whole sections of the continents.
        
         | tracerbulletx wrote:
         | A chilling realization that follows from this picture is that
         | the inhabitants of North America encountered by most of the
         | Europeans who came later were more or less the post-apocalyptic
         | remnants of once large civilizations that had already collapsed
         | in a continent wide pandemic.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2022-12-28 23:01 UTC)