[HN Gopher] Researchers find that a simple "talking to strangers...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Researchers find that a simple "talking to strangers" intervention
       is effective
        
       Author : sinashahandeh
       Score  : 104 points
       Date   : 2022-12-22 12:40 UTC (2 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.psypost.org)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.psypost.org)
        
       | RyanShook wrote:
       | I'm reading this book to help overcome my fear of talking to
       | strangers.
       | 
       | How to Talk to Anyone https://amzn.to/3YKFc21
        
       | jasim wrote:
       | > The researchers utilized 286 participants recruited from two
       | universities: one in the United States and one in the United
       | Kingdom.
       | 
       | The discussion here is interesting, but the research itself falls
       | to the typical psychology research trap of using university
       | students.
        
         | semitones wrote:
         | Was my first thought as well
        
         | amelius wrote:
         | Researcher: That's odd ...
         | 
         | HN: Yes, in this very specific instance! Move along, nothing to
         | see here!
        
           | Tostino wrote:
           | It's one of those where there really isn't too much to
           | discuss until this study is reproduced with another
           | population segment.
        
             | gpm wrote:
             | No. The result is just as interesting (if not more) if it
             | only applies to some population segments...
        
       | JoeAltmaier wrote:
       | The study was important, but limited in the usual way? Some
       | 20-something college students, many paid to perform the study?
       | 
       | In my mind it underscores the need to introduce folks at a
       | younger age to social situations. It's a problem that college
       | students still can't talk to strangers.
       | 
       | How about a High School program of 'meet a random classmate' or
       | some such? It's all about exposure and becoming resilient.
        
       | null_object wrote:
       | One overlooked factor in this article, is that some cultures
       | consider people strange if they _don't_ make smalltalk between
       | strangers, while others may consider you borderline insane if you
       | _do._
       | 
       | I moved from a country where these interactions are normal, to
       | one where they never happen, and I still find it vaguely
       | depressing.
       | 
       | Otoh people who've moved here and never noticed the discomfort of
       | those around them when they chatter to strangers are happily
       | oblivious to the cultural nuances.
       | 
       | I'd gladly be more like them.
        
       | curiousgal wrote:
       | Ah yes, the buzzfeed of science journalism.
        
       | bilsbie wrote:
       | Does anyone know what I could say to strangers? That part trips
       | me up.
        
         | anyfactor wrote:
         | I am a pretty asocial dude. But I think I can make a decent
         | first impression by being a "social chameleon".
         | 
         | - recognize the environment you are in
         | 
         | - what are the common ideas that are popular within that space
         | 
         | - wait for a cue and say something interesting that opens up to
         | a response
         | 
         | - listen and contribute to the conversation
         | 
         | - start by almost telling a story or making a comment.
         | 
         | - having a friend with you will 10x your confidence in being
         | more open to these conversation
         | 
         | - make sure you are not tired and you really are committed to
         | have a discussion
         | 
         | Recognize the fact you can't easily have a good conversation
         | with a random stranger. You need to have something in common
         | with them. The less things you have in common with them the
         | more reluctant you will feel to invest in having a casual
         | conversation with them.
        
           | JoeAltmaier wrote:
           | Good advice.
           | 
           | I'm also fairly asocial. I can be 'on' for maybe an hour
           | before social fatigue sets in. The bigger the crowd, the
           | smaller the half-life of my social energy.
        
         | JoeAltmaier wrote:
         | Something situational. "This is a pretty good party! X always
         | seems to do a good job getting interesting folks together."
         | 
         | Start small, work up. Don't start with a long story. Maybe skip
         | the questions, which obligates the other to come up with
         | something, making them uncomfortable. Make a statement about
         | something neutral, or about yourself. See if it gets a
         | response. No? Move on.
        
         | [deleted]
        
         | itsmemattchung wrote:
         | I think context is key: who, what, when, where, why.
         | 
         | If I'm picking up my daughter from school, striking up a
         | conversation with someone (i.e. another parent) would be
         | totally different than making chit chat with someone at the
         | bar/club. Often, the thing that previously held me back from
         | talking with someone was fear of rejection, something I really
         | struggled with in my early 20s and found that as I've gotten
         | older (mid 30s now), I'm much more comfortable under my own
         | skin and find it easier to approach strangers. I don't think
         | the fear will ever disappear but, does get easier (in my case)
         | with age.
        
         | metamet wrote:
         | A simple comment on the situation is a great ice breaker.
         | 
         | After that, the simplest trick is to ask questions that get
         | them talking about themselves. Most people are more than happy
         | to talk about something they're familiar with, so asking
         | something that only they can answer ("So who do you know
         | here?", "What do you do for a living?", "What are some of your
         | hobbies?") will get the conversation flowing.
        
         | willhinsa wrote:
         | Start with small talk! It's so valuable in establishing a
         | baseline of "we're two humans in the same condition at heart,
         | and the first thing I'm offering is a universally shared
         | experience, and not talking crazy to you or starting a fight
         | (physical or political or otherwise)"
         | 
         | A lot of people think it's just useless filler but it actually
         | is so important and a valuable tool when meeting people!
         | 
         | Talk about the weather! I'm serious! And drop any kind of
         | internal pretension about being too good for such an inane
         | topic (if that applies to you). Embrace it as if you're meeting
         | someone from a distant tribe, and you are both wary of each
         | other, and you want to start things off on a good foot. Talking
         | about things you know you both deal with and think about is
         | literally perfect!
        
         | wolverine876 wrote:
         | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34121349
        
         | karmelapple wrote:
         | This book by Leil Lowndes helped me a lot, I highly recommend
         | it: How to Talk to Anyone: 92 Little Tricks for Big Success in
         | Relationships
         | 
         | https://a.co/d/cinkdXJ
        
         | xyzelement wrote:
         | To add to the others comments about small talk. A big blocker
         | to being able to small talk is self-centeredness / self-
         | consciousness. A lot of people think that if they say something
         | to someone they will be evaluated and that's almost never the
         | case.
         | 
         | Unless you look homeless or like you are selling something, and
         | unless the other person is mentally ill, they will welcome you
         | speaking to them.
         | 
         | And then in terms of content, jokes, questions, and
         | observations work well.
         | 
         | For example, if someone's with a small kid, I'll ask how old
         | the kid is. If someone's driving a family SUV (something I know
         | about from having shopped for one last year) I'll ask how they
         | like it. Or just comment - I like your cars, actually
         | considered it last year.
         | 
         | Make a joke, even a lame one. Long line at the coffee shop?
         | "Wow I need a coffee just to get a coffee here!" Or even dumb
         | stuff like "that's a huge menu, I don't see coffee on it"
         | 
         | Etc. The main thing is - if you are coming from a place of
         | being human, it will come across as such. Content matters less.
        
         | __MatrixMan__ wrote:
         | I think my last conversation with a stranger started with: "you
         | know, I thought I needed a zucchini, but after looking through
         | these I'm not so sure".
         | 
         | So uh, give that one a try?
        
         | fxtentacle wrote:
         | Anything that you both see happening. For example commenting on
         | a cute dog passing by is a great conversation starter because
         | everyone likes cute animals but everyone has a different
         | opinion on what makes them cute.
         | 
         | Some people will go for your conversational hook and jump in.
         | Others will ignore you. That's just life and normal, don't
         | worry about it.
         | 
         | If someone joins your conversation, be sure to give them plenty
         | of space and time to talk themselves. Most people who feel shy
         | make the mistake of filing every conversational gap and every
         | silent minute. But that other person maybe just needs a moment
         | to remember a funny story to tell you.
        
       | einpoklum wrote:
       | Notwithstanding the valid criticism of this being a typical "we
       | solicited a bunch of university students to XYZ" study...
       | 
       | > People's beliefs changed slowly throughout the course of the
       | study
       | 
       | this is interesting: It's not just people's behavior patterns
       | that change quickly, it's even their _beliefs_ - and even when
       | they know they were being manipulated. An example of the extent
       | to which "social being determines consciousness".
        
       | cardanome wrote:
       | I find it odd that nearly no one mentioned the issue that some
       | people don't want to be talked to. Especially women tend to
       | suffer from unwanted attention but it also applies to the general
       | case.
       | 
       | Just as you don't have want advertisers to spam your email
       | address or call you without your consent you might not want
       | randos to try to talk to you.
       | 
       | Please don't reply with stochastic methods like trying to read
       | the other person body language and other circumstances and making
       | predictions about whether they would like to be talked to or not.
       | These methods have a failure rate and if you are talking to a lot
       | of strangers it means you will step on lot of toes even if you
       | can keep the failure rate relatively low.
       | 
       | Having a baseline dread about talking to strangers is just being
       | a well-adjusted adult.
       | 
       | Now there are social contexts like networking events where
       | talking to stranger is encouraged and a good skill to have but I
       | don't think people that are not good at this are necessarily
       | defect.
       | 
       | I feel like the general societal trend is more in the direction
       | of talking to stranger becoming less socially acceptable, not to
       | mention to mention that is already very unacceptable in many
       | countries and would be seen at outright weird.
        
       | guerrilla wrote:
       | This isn't really news; it's just exposure therapy, which is
       | pretty well known. Habituation is everything in these domains. I
       | do like the scavenger hunt though. That's a good icebreaker. The
       | list is at the very end of the study by the way[1]. These seem
       | pretty difficult for someone with social anxiety or poor
       | smalltalking skills though.                 Al Fresco Find
       | someone outdoors, and [talk to/observe] them for a few minutes.
       | All Smiles Find someone who seems friendly and [talk to/observe]
       | them for a few minutes.       Artsy Find someone who looks
       | artistic and [talk to/observe] them for a few minutes.       Blue
       | Mood Find someone who looks sad and [talk to/observe] them for a
       | few minutes.       Bossy Pants Find someone who looks like a
       | leader and [talk to/observe] them for a few minutes.
       | Caffeination Station Find a barista/server and [talk to/observe]
       | them for a few minutes.       Coffee Break Find someone who's
       | drinking a coffee and [talk to/observe] them for a few minutes.
       | Do Gooder Find someone who seems like a nice or kind person and
       | [talk to/observe] them for a few minutes.       Fashionista Find
       | someone who's accessorizing (e.g., wearing a scarf, hat...) and
       | [talk to/observe] them for a few minutes.       Fun Fabric Find
       | someone wearing stand-out print (e.g., stripes, animal-print) and
       | [talk to/observe] them for a few minutes.       Graphic Tee Find
       | someone who is wearing an interesting shirt and [talk to/observe]
       | them for a few minutes.       Hot Find someone whom you find
       | attractive and [talk to/observe] them for a few minutes.
       | Hungry Find someone who's eating and [talk to/observe] them for a
       | few minutes.       Inked Up Find someone who has a tattoo and
       | [talk to/observe] them for a few minutes.       Inside Find
       | someone indoors and [talk to/observe] them for a few minutes.
       | Jock Find someone sporty and [talk to/observe] them for a few
       | minutes.       Kickin' It Find someone who is wearing interesting
       | shoes and [talk to/observe] them for a few minutes.       Line Up
       | Find someone who's waiting in a queue/line and [talk to/observe]
       | them for a few minutes.       Manscape Find someone who has a
       | beard/goatee/etc. and [talk to/observe] them for a few minutes.
       | Minion Find someone who is wearing a uniform and [talk
       | to/observe] them for a few minutes.       Nailed It Find someone
       | who has funky nails (e.g., unusual shade, fancy design) and [talk
       | to/observe] them for a few minutes.       Next Gen Find someone
       | who's from a different generation than you and [talk to/observe]
       | them for a few minutes.       On Top Find someone who is wearing
       | a hat and [talk to/observe] them for a few minutes.       Ray of
       | Sunshine Find someone who looks happy and [talk to/observe] them
       | for a few minutes.       Sexy Find someone whose gender differs
       | from yours and [talk to/observe] them for a few minutes.
       | Skin Deep Find someone whose skin tone is different from yours
       | and [talk to/observe] them for a few minutes.       Twins Find
       | someone wearing the same thing as you (hair style, shirt, shoes,
       | etc.) and [talk to/observe] them for a few minutes.       Unicorn
       | Find someone who has eye-catching hair (e.g., pink tips), dyed
       | hair, or a cool hair style and [talk to/observe] them for a few
       | minutes.       Wild Card x 2 Find anyone of your choosing and
       | [talk to/observe] them for a few minutes.
       | 
       | 1.
       | https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002210312...
        
       | dheera wrote:
       | > many people fear social interactions with strangers due to
       | worries about rejection
       | 
       | Actually, no, I don't initiate interactions with strangers
       | because I'm male and a good chunk of the population would think
       | I'm a creep if I try to interact with them.
        
       | nsxwolf wrote:
       | Whenever a stranger talks to me, I think they're about to accuse
       | me of something.
        
       | cpach wrote:
       | I'm quite the chatterbox and I love talking to strangers. Even if
       | I will never see them again. I do it quite often. I feel it
       | really adds more fun and meaning as I navigate through my little
       | town, or the big city, doing everyday things that could otherwise
       | be quite boring. So at least to me this article rings true.
        
         | marcodiego wrote:
         | I knew people who loved doing that. One of them told me
         | recently that conspiracism has ruined the experience. It is
         | very hard to talk to someone today without eventually hearing a
         | "Did you know that" followed by a baseless conspiracy theory.
        
           | mistermann wrote:
           | I feel the same way about people and their media and
           | culturally powered "truths" which are rarely substantiated as
           | fact, and often conflict with conspiracy theories.
           | 
           | Although, I find talking to all sorts of people about their
           | "factual" beliefs about "reality" to be an immensely
           | enjoyable experience. Smart people very often hold the most
           | interesting beliefs.
        
           | cheschire wrote:
           | Yep, we used to have taboo topics, but the overton window is
           | massive these days.
        
             | epicureanideal wrote:
             | But maybe it's a good thing that people say these things
             | out loud so we can discuss them and maybe convince them
             | otherwise? Or learn that in some cases they might be right?
        
               | cheschire wrote:
               | Sure, if you have patience and energy for those sorts of
               | tug-of-war type conversations.
        
           | tehwebguy wrote:
           | Woah, all different topics or what?
        
         | gausswho wrote:
         | I also seek out interactions with people I don't know. I'm
         | quite practiced at making it natural and unscary for the other
         | person. Usually never see them again, and that's ok and even
         | desired. There's something very satisfying about it, like I'm
         | sharing a moment with the same person each time but in a
         | different recombination of the whole of us. I strive to keep a
         | regular flow of such interactions coming and I find myself
         | getting ambiguously down if they start to dwindle.
        
           | flappyeagle wrote:
           | Any tips? I can usually carry a conversation but hard to
           | think of a reason to start one
        
             | HPsquared wrote:
             | A random observation a la Seinfeld is always good.
        
             | wolverine876 wrote:
             | Say what you feel, be genuine. Be curious about them -
             | including, read the situation. If they are anxiously
             | texting, or looking otherwise like they wouldn't want to be
             | disturbed, don't. And don't force it - there's not always
             | something to say. It's not hard, there's no secret code;
             | it's very basic.
             | 
             | Most of the problem is anxiety. As with anything new,
             | you'll get over it as it becomes familiar. Be patient with
             | yourself.
             | 
             | The bus is late, _again_ , say 'Not again! Are the other
             | buses always late?'
             | 
             | Their fingernail polish catches your eye, say, 'hey -
             | that's great. I love the color/design/etc.'
             | 
             | People don't always respond, some might even look at you
             | strangely - oh well!
        
         | pat2man wrote:
         | Me too but when I was younger I hated it. It was definitely
         | centered around a fear of being rejected or ridiculed. I
         | eventually learned that my fear was unfounded. Possibly a good
         | use of cognitive behavioral therapy.
        
           | wpietri wrote:
           | For me my fears were richly justified by experience.
           | 
           | Casual conversation with strangers is both complex and
           | subtle, and particularly requires specific face and body
           | language. I think neurotypicals underestimate the complexity
           | because it comes naturally to them.
           | 
           | These days I'm fine at it and have no fear. But getting rid
           | of the fear took getting good at it and doing it enough to
           | compensate for those older experiences.
        
             | taeric wrote:
             | I'm wary of claims that neurotypicals are somehow better at
             | it. Seems more likely that nobody is as good as most
             | everyone assumes they are. That is, self assessment is a
             | known hard problem. Assessment of others would have many of
             | the same traps.
        
               | lazide wrote:
               | There are well recognized patterns in specific types of
               | 'neuro divergents' that are fundamental to the conditions
               | and that make it very difficult, if not impossible, to
               | recognize or process common social cues in useful ways.
               | It makes them categorically have a much harder time in
               | this area, for those categories.
               | 
               | What you're saying is essentially 'meh, don't just assume
               | you are hallucinating sometimes just because you're
               | schizophrenic'.
               | 
               | Maybe? but if they think they are, they very well might
               | be right.
        
               | taeric wrote:
               | Fair. My wariness comes from knowing a large number of
               | people that claim to have these complications, but are
               | also just rude people.
               | 
               | Which is to say, they may be divergent. That doesn't do
               | much to suggest that others are "better" at this. Turns
               | out that life is hard for most everyone.
        
               | lazide wrote:
               | How would you expect them to present except as rude, in
               | that situation?
               | 
               | That sounds like you're complaining that said
               | schizophrenic in the prior example just 'seems a little
               | crazy', but life is tough for everyone?
        
               | taeric wrote:
               | I mean rude in the child sense, honestly. Kids can be
               | seen as neuro divergent, sure. But even "typical" ones
               | are often surprisingly rude. Very few people just "know"
               | how to be polite.
        
               | lazide wrote:
               | Ok, but what would you expect it to look like otherwise,
               | if they could not actually learn those things because
               | their brain was not wired to be able to?
               | 
               | They still are going to grow up, but unlike normal folks,
               | they can't learn those skills - or if they do, it takes
               | vastly more effort.
        
               | taeric wrote:
               | Me claim is more to be taken that you should work from
               | the assumption it is hard for everyone. Setting yourself
               | apart as someone that is "just bad" at it is going to
               | reinforce that idea.
               | 
               | Can it be true? Of course. Some folks are also just bad
               | at math.
        
               | nicoburns wrote:
               | If it was hard for everyone it wouldn't be such a
               | problem, as presumably people would be more tolerant of
               | others getting it "wrong". As it is, it seems that
               | there's a large cadre of people who not only find it
               | easy, but find the "correct" behaviours so self-evident
               | that they tend to assume that people who don't notice
               | these things (or whose natural preferences are different
               | from the unwritten social norm) are being wilfully
               | offensive.
        
               | taeric wrote:
               | It is a learned skill. And many norms are not as shared
               | as folks assume they are. As such, I think you are
               | understating how willing folks are to tolerate people
               | getting it "wrong."
               | 
               | I say this as someone that would almost certainly be
               | described as neuro divergent. Fake it till you make it is
               | the norm for social interactions. That and repetition.
               | 
               | Is akin to thinking everyone else is a good dancer. I
               | mean, the more practiced dancers will be better, at
               | large. There are relatively fewer folks that can't dance,
               | compared to those that don't dance.
        
       | helf wrote:
       | Some days I'm super chatty and will talk to whoever in person or
       | online. But I really don't get the obsession society has at large
       | with small talk and socializing. I'll happily go weeks with no
       | human contact.
       | 
       | People losing their shit over the pandemic lockdowns was cracking
       | me up. "Omg can't socialize how I want for a few months!!"
        
       | amelius wrote:
       | Is there something governments can do to make their citizens talk
       | to strangers more often?
       | 
       | Society seems to be going in the opposite direction (e.g. self-
       | checkouts at supermarkets, government services being available
       | over the internet, online shops, online gaming, etc.)
        
         | scarecrowbob wrote:
         | Perhaps the government could create vast extended families and
         | assign them to people via last names like Daffodil-11 or
         | Oriole-2 .
        
           | [deleted]
        
         | azornathogron wrote:
         | Perhaps this is not something that governments need to do.
         | 
         | A government doesn't actually need to be the director or
         | curator of a country's culture, even though it is in a position
         | of great influence.
        
           | idle_zealot wrote:
           | > A government doesn't actually need to be the director or
           | curator of a country's culture
           | 
           | A government, particularly local government, _will_ strongly
           | direct community culture whether it seeks to or not.
           | Particularly zoning and construction planning will influence
           | the space people do or do not have available for meeting and
           | socializing. The trend in the US seems to be to spread people
           | out and privatize most or all  "public" social spaces. I
           | wouldn't attribute this shift to governments intentionally
           | trying to shift culture to being more isolated, but that is
           | the outcome regardless. This means that the only real counter
           | to this shift is to get governments to consider the social
           | impact of planning and factor it into their decision making.
        
         | jjj123 wrote:
         | Absolutely: create more public spaces for people to congregate
         | without spending money.
        
         | xyzelement wrote:
         | Something I noticed is that religion is a great "forcing
         | function" for a lot of healthy behavior including
         | socialization.
         | 
         | If your daily or weekly life involves going to a Church,
         | synagogue, it something else- you have a built in structure for
         | being around and interacting with people.
         | 
         | It's interesting for me to think about - religion declined as
         | percentage of population in recent decades but I suspect in the
         | long run (1/2 generations) religion provides enough antidote to
         | things that plague secular society (isolation, depression,
         | childlessness) that it might swing the percentages in the other
         | direction.
        
           | guerrilla wrote:
           | > religion is a great "forcing function" for a lot of healthy
           | behavior
           | 
           | And for a lot of unhealthy behavior too.
        
         | civopsec wrote:
         | Why would a government have anything to do with this?
         | 
         | But if you insist: the best thing a government can do is to
         | have some civic service which any kind of person can be called
         | to do (not just the unenemployed, the retired, or other such
         | people that the govt. wants to "keep busy"). There's nothing
         | that bonds more (between strangers) than reluctantly having to
         | do some task because either Nature or Government is forcing you
         | to. ;)
         | 
         | Or just facilitate the creation and running of volunteer
         | groups.
        
       | z3r0k00l wrote:
       | why is america getting this strange obsession with forcing people
       | to do shit they dont want to?
        
       | o--o wrote:
       | Mama Said Don't Talk To Strangers . . .
        
       | frabjoused wrote:
       | If I was in that intervention, knowing I was interacting with
       | other participants would make it easier for me to communicate
       | because I would know they were expecting it.
        
       | kentlyons wrote:
       | It wasn't entirely clear from this article, but the intervention
       | itself is the scavenger hunt and associated instructions. From
       | the supplementary material: "Participants in the treatment
       | condition were asked to talk to the person for at least a couple
       | minutes, whereas participants in the control condition were
       | simply asked to observe the person for at least a couple
       | minutes". And from the related work this is based on previous
       | research: "This suggests a promising intervention strategy: give
       | people concentrated and repeated practice talking to strangers,
       | so that they may realize their fears are exaggerated."
        
       | varispeed wrote:
       | Not sure if this is anything ground breaking. I used to have a
       | fear of talking to strangers, but as life would have it I had not
       | choice but to get a customer facing job, which meant approaching
       | strangers and talking to them. It was terrifying, but after a
       | couple of days I wouldn't even think about it. It became nothing.
       | Then after I left that job after a couple of months the same fear
       | has come back and it was difficult again.
        
       | vouaobrasil wrote:
       | Since developing my hobby -- photography, I always talk to
       | strangers. Or more accurately, they always talk to me. People are
       | always interested in what I am photographing. My advice is take
       | up a hobby you can do outside. Not only does it give you
       | something to talk about, but it also makes you seem like a fun
       | person to talk to (a person with hobbies is likely to be more
       | healthy and normal than one without). Plus if you are doing
       | something it likely means you are in a good mood and aren't
       | likely to be someone to take up another person's time too much.
       | It restricts the space of likely outcomes of a chance encounter
       | to be mostly good outcomes.
        
         | MezzoDelCammin wrote:
         | Have You ever tried asking people to pose for You? Kinda been
         | thinking about developing this particular skill myself...
        
           | vouaobrasil wrote:
           | Ah not yet. I'm a little shy to do that still. But I
           | definitely want to try it!
        
       | pella wrote:
       | [dead]
        
       | mtnygard wrote:
       | "At its heart, our intervention is simple: it involves repeatedly
       | approaching and talking to strangers."
       | 
       | So... the "intervention" to help people gain confidence talking
       | to strangers was to have them talk to a bunch of strangers. What
       | an odd thing to make an article about.
        
         | JoeAltmaier wrote:
         | Sometimes the solution is obvious. The real mystery is how we
         | let folks get to college without any opportunity to practice
         | social situations.
        
         | Gare wrote:
         | If I understand the article correctly, it's about the research
         | that tested whether talking to strangers improves wellbeing.
        
       | skybrian wrote:
       | ...is effective for some college students in the US and UK.
       | 
       | It would be interesting to see if it varies depending on age or
       | in other countries.
        
       | technological wrote:
       | This is what I liked about commuting in public bus during my
       | undergrad in india. I could easily start conversations with
       | strangers and learn so many things
        
       | jx593 wrote:
       | [dead]
        
       | sinashahandeh wrote:
       | Researchers game money to people and an app so that they pick up
       | a stranger and talk to them. They reported positive psychological
       | outcome out of the exercise.
        
       | civopsec wrote:
       | People got better at something they practiced?
       | 
       | > Though many people have this pervasive fear, research has shown
       | that most strangers are perfectly happy to be spoken to, leaving
       | this common fear unfounded.
       | 
       | They could be happy because it's a nice change of pace. But what
       | would happen if 20% of people started interacting more with other
       | people? Would that be liked, or would people be annoyed with
       | that?
       | 
       | > Social interaction is very important and has many well-
       | documented benefits, such as increased happiness, better health,
       | and stronger sense of belonging.
       | 
       | This has become yet another thing for me to worry about: how many
       | "cigarettes worth" am I smoking by not socializing enough?
       | Thanks, media.
       | 
       | I am almost never lonely alone. (Being along isn't terribly fun
       | but it doesn't feel _bad_ , either.) Only together with other
       | people. Because I see what they have and what I don't. Then I
       | blame myself for my jealousy--it is mine, after all. But jealousy
       | is a social thing too, is it not? And that's kind of the kicker.
       | Feeling out of place, unworthy, being bothered by the well-
       | adjustedness of others _is also_ part of the social game. So
       | yeah, _they_ get to have better blood pressure, better longevity,
       | and so on--good for them. But I wonder: was their joy and
       | happiness a social co-creation, while my less-than-happy
       | disposition (again, in the proximity of other people) was self-
       | inflicted? Because it wasn't like I just looked at the bare facts
       | (as presented to me) of other people's lives and then felt bad--I
       | was also informed, in no uncertain terms, of what was acceptable,
       | good, wholesome, and what was deservedly labeled as miserable and
       | degenerate.
       | 
       | And yet they will be happy together while my misery is almost
       | only mine--(1) it was self-inflicted, (2) there is no one else to
       | blame but "society", which is too vague, and (3) being upset at
       | others would just lower my status further.
       | 
       | And I also will be quiet about this to others. Because no one
       | wants to hear about it. But I will know. And they will know. And
       | I will say "it was fine". And they will judge me or don't care.
       | And I will think that they judge me.
        
       | zug_zug wrote:
       | Would love a website for this, timeboxed 3-5 minute chats, like
       | chatroulette but ... just normalish people.
        
         | alden5 wrote:
         | I've found that being a native english speaker and offering to
         | have quick calls/chats with those who are learning is a great
         | way to chat with new people. I get to meet cool people from all
         | around the world, it's a great experience and I haven't had to
         | deal with any weirdos, unlike stranger chat websites where
         | finding someone normal is a challenge. I specifically joined an
         | English discord server, you'll be surprised how many people
         | will want to contact you if you just introduce yourself as a
         | native speaker whiling to talk.
        
         | endisneigh wrote:
         | what incentive would there be for someone to participate?
         | "social media" like this or reddit is the closest you'd get
        
       | geocrasher wrote:
       | "Don't talk to strangers!"
       | 
       | Having been told this over and over again as a child there is a
       | taboo that was set up about it. It's not right obviously. As a
       | small child of course it is can be dangerous to talk to strangers
       | but it is the worst kind of fear-mongering.
       | 
       | That's not to say that kids don't need to be protected and that
       | there isn't caution to be had for small children. But the blanket
       | statement "Don't talk to strangers!" tends to stick with people
       | just like riding the bike on the wrong side of the road so you
       | can see cars coming, because that's what they were told to do as
       | children. In practice though even that is quite dangerous.
       | 
       | Clearly these both have benefits in their context but
       | unfortunately there is no expiration date given for them.
        
         | solarmist wrote:
         | Yeah, I'm literally going to teach my kids to talk to everyone.
         | 
         | Don't go with anyone we haven't approved, but talk to everyone.
        
       | eshack94 wrote:
       | To get better at something, force yourself to do it more often.
       | Exposure therapy, there's nothing new or novel here. But it is
       | effective.
        
         | itsmemattchung wrote:
         | In general, I agree. But most recently, there's one thing
         | that's _not_ (for me, at least) getting easier despite doing it
         | every day: cold water exposure.
         | 
         | I'm someone who HATES HATES HATES cold temperature. Once, while
         | camping in one of the Californian mountains during winter about
         | 8 years ago, I couldn't stand the cold and I ended up stuffing
         | heated hand-warmers in both of my shoes...accidentally fell
         | asleep and woke up blistered feet.
         | 
         | Anyways, starting July 2022 (a little over six months ago), I
         | started cold water exposure. Every morning, as early as 4:30
         | am, I would force myself to hop in the shower and blast myself
         | with cold water for at least 3 minutes. Sometimes 4 minutes.
         | Now, I've been doing this consistently, every day, since then,
         | and .... it's not getting easier. I still hate it. Every time.
         | But I still do it, every day. But no, definitely not getting
         | "better" at it, I don't think.
        
           | hrnnnnnn wrote:
           | Are you focusing your attention on the feeling of the cold
           | water on your skin, or are you trying to distract yourself
           | from it?
        
           | smokel wrote:
           | Interesting experiment. How do you feel after or during the
           | three minutes? Would you describe the experience as
           | rewarding?
           | 
           | If not, perhaps you could change something in or after the
           | routine to create a positive feedback?
        
             | itsmemattchung wrote:
             | During the 3 minutes: mildly physically painful and
             | mentally challenged. After, though, very rewarding -- the
             | adrenaline helps wake me up and helps me transition fairly
             | quickly into a state of focus.
             | 
             | > If not, perhaps you could change something in or after
             | the routine to create a positive feedback?
             | 
             | You're probably right: I probably need to start
             | incorporating some better breathing techniques (e.g. Wim
             | Hof).
        
               | TedDoesntTalk wrote:
               | > Wim Hof
               | 
               | Came here to suggest him to you. First i read his book,
               | and used the technique there. It's described in a page or
               | two; you don't have to read the whole book unless you
               | want to). Now I use his phone app. He also has YouTube
               | videos but I haven't watched them.
               | 
               | Anyway, his breathing technique really helped me. I have
               | not done cold baths yet, just showers, but it's been 2
               | years and I can take a cold shower of any duration now.
               | Started at 10 seconds!
               | 
               | The breathing technique can take 20 minutes so if I'm in
               | a hurry, I skip it and seem to do ok anyway. Not sure how
               | or why, but maybe just by habit.
        
         | gundamdoubleO wrote:
         | It can be difficult for people to take that first step though.
         | 
         | I was extremely anxious about making conversation with
         | strangers for years. Actually forcing myself to just do it and
         | accept the uncomfortable feeling I always felt during and
         | afterwards felt like an insurmountable task. I eventually did
         | get mostly competent at it but that process of convincing
         | myself to start and keep going probably took years.
        
         | sph wrote:
         | That is true, but the point of the article is a little more
         | subtle: not only exposure helps, but most of us hold the
         | irrational belief that strangers are not interested in talking
         | with us, and this study shows that strangers are actually more
         | pleasant and forthcoming than one might think they are.
         | 
         | I am terrible with striking conversations with random people on
         | the street or outside of settings I know I have to meet
         | someone. But the 3 or 4 times in my life I _had_ to interact
         | with complete strangers, or groups of them, it always went
         | better than expected. Anyone that has taken a little MDMA at a
         | party will have experienced it: when you make a point of
         | introducing yourself to everyone, people tend to be quite
         | friendly and open.
        
           | itsmemattchung wrote:
           | > Anyone that has taken a little MDMA at a party will have
           | experienced it: when you make a point of introducing yourself
           | to everyone, people tend to be quite friendly and open
           | 
           | Especially if everyone else is on MDMA as well...
        
             | sph wrote:
             | During that MDMA experience of mine I was the only one
             | tripping, and I met all people in that small club, went
             | backstage to chat with the band, joined two ladies and
             | smoothly started dancing and flirting with one of them (but
             | I was too high to take it further. People on ecstasy have a
             | rather unattractive pale look)
             | 
             | The next day I remember how easy it felt, and that the fear
             | of strangers was completely irrational; Certainly, sober I
             | make an even better impression than when I'm high as a
             | kite.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2022-12-24 23:01 UTC)