[HN Gopher] Hacker News Insight
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Hacker News Insight
        
       Author : Hooopo
       Score  : 55 points
       Date   : 2022-12-23 20:36 UTC (2 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (hackernews-insight.vercel.app)
 (TXT) w3m dump (hackernews-insight.vercel.app)
        
       | jmacd wrote:
       | The "Users who got the most voted on hackernews" should exclude
       | the 1 upvote you get for your actual submission (if it is being
       | counted, which I think it is). If it is counted, the sheer volume
       | of submissions by the top posters makes it seem like they are
       | getting more votes from the community than they are.
        
       | samwillis wrote:
       | This was a similar one from last year:
       | 
       | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29778994
       | 
       | https://whaly.io/posts/top-10k-commenters-of-hacker-news-in-...
       | 
       | https://whaly.io/posts/hacker-news-2021-retrospective
        
       | zone411 wrote:
       | I would like to see the top list of most upvoted users but only
       | counting their comment scores, not submissions.
        
       | taubek wrote:
       | This is really nice.
        
       | andreygrehov wrote:
       | Very interesting. Why is there such a massive spike of text
       | stories after 2021-11-01?
        
       | jacooper wrote:
       | Huh, what was the bump for web3 before 2012 for?
        
         | wildpeaks wrote:
         | Like the word "metaverse", it used to mean something else
         | ("semantic web" in this instance) before it got co-opted.
        
         | fanso99 wrote:
         | Semantic Web 3.0 https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semantic_Web
        
       | fogonthehorn wrote:
       | Wow, some of these users seem to be quite addicted to this site.
       | 
       | I would like to ask coldtea, DanBC, dragonwriter, dredmorbius,
       | jacquesm, jonbaer, pjmlp, pseudolus, rayiner, TeMPOraL, Tomte,
       | tosh, tptacek, and others in the top list -- why?
        
       | Krasnol wrote:
       | I would love to see Android/Google vs. Apple/IPhone statistics.
        
       | arcturus17 wrote:
       | Cool!
       | 
       | A couple of questions:
       | 
       | 1. How did you gather the data?
       | 
       | 2. What's the architecture / tech stack? Data store, data
       | pipelines / back-end, front-end? The presentation layer looks
       | really neat.
        
         | gardenfelder wrote:
         | Data is available on the HN API. There are a number of OSS
         | projects which use that.
        
         | samwillis wrote:
         | The code for the site is here:
         | https://github.com/hooopo/hackernews-insight
         | 
         | Sadly no in depth write up.
        
       | kureikain wrote:
       | In the list of the top 10 users who got most upvote, one of the
       | user is mooreds who runs an amazing newsletter call "Letter to a
       | new developer"
       | 
       | https://letterstoanewdeveloper.com/
       | 
       | Highly recommend to follow mooreds and his newsletter. It's great
       | that he spend his time to tailor and help the new developer.
       | 
       | Not affiliate with mooreds in any mean just a happy audience.
        
       | lifeisstillgood wrote:
       | Whoa - people _submit_ thirty thousand stories. I mean I can
       | imagine drunk commenting a badly thought out phrase a few
       | thousand times (that 's basically my metier) but ... reading an
       | article, being amazed, and submitting it ... that's a lot
       | 
       | Edit: Just to point out this is not necessarily a criticism or
       | some snide remark. I am pretty sure that back in the day I would
       | have looked at similar Wikipedia stats and gone "whoa there are
       | people who basically have a full time job trying to organise an
       | online encyclopaedia." Then I would have assumed I could code it
       | in a weekend. The point I think is not "these must be low effort
       | submissions" but "HN has a more diverse ecosystem than a rando
       | like me posting every so often"
       | 
       | In short - who knows what the forums of the future will look like
       | or be? HN does not look like the forums from ages back - it maybe
       | something new.
        
         | gnicholas wrote:
         | > _reading an article, being amazed, and submitting it ... that
         | 's a lot_
         | 
         | I'm pretty sure they skip steps 1 and 2!
        
         | Nowado wrote:
         | I'm almost sure those are points and not submissions, as the
         | numbers are the same as in 'Users who got the most voted on
         | hackernews'.
        
         | JadeNB wrote:
         | > In short - who knows what the forums of the future will look
         | like or be? HN does not look like the forums from ages back -
         | it maybe something new.
         | 
         | HN is the closest to the forums of yesteryear of anything I can
         | find on today's internet, and that's definitely what I like
         | best about it. (Not just the visual aesthetic, but also the
         | tone and dedication to maintaining its original sense of
         | community.)
        
           | lifeisstillgood wrote:
           | I may not be a good representative sample, but the forums I
           | remember were fairly niche (transatlantic life advice) and
           | consequently small. 4chan style meltdowns were avoided but HN
           | is on a different scale. It might be an aberration, it might
           | be a new way to moderate / build community. I am not sure but
           | it is a very interesting question how we got here. And is it
           | replicable?
           | 
           | And if there are people who do the equivalent of full time
           | work making it so - that's a clue to ... something
        
             | JadeNB wrote:
             | > And if there are people who do the equivalent of full
             | time work making it so - that's a clue to ... something
             | 
             | dang, who seems never to sleep, surely puts in even more
             | than full time work, and is responsible as much as anyone
             | else for HN being what it is.
        
               | lifeisstillgood wrote:
               | Absolutely. But it is his actual full time job. I think
               | an interesting signal is when people who (#) are not paid
               | still spend an enormous amount of time on a "thing".
               | That's either you have found weirdos, or found some level
               | of market fit - gold flakes in the river bed if you like.
               | 
               | (#) I am assuming all the people with really high
               | submission rates are not HN moderators or otherwise
               | employed / encouraged.
        
         | remote_phone wrote:
         | Must be some sort of bot or marketing service. If you look at
         | their posting history, they submit the same article over and
         | over again. This should be filtered or flagged.
        
           | melling wrote:
           | People could at least recognize people who are farming karma
           | and stop upvoting them.
        
       | raphlinus wrote:
       | I love how "ski" is such an outlier for highly upvoted TLDs.
       | Either the Hacker News crowd really loves skiing, or
       | ciechanow.ski is responsible. I bet there is a similar story for
       | most of the other TLDs on the list, but don't recognize any of
       | the others (except for home.cern which is pretty obvious).
        
         | Veuxdo wrote:
         | Statistically, you'd expect the most successful (and least
         | successful) TLDs by success rate to be low-volume. The high-
         | volume domains will cluster around the middle.
        
         | edgyquant wrote:
         | A lot of us are from California or the Seattle area. I could
         | definitely see skiing being a common hobby for that demographic
        
       | jer0me wrote:
       | Cool, 38.7k no-context Wikipedia articles.
        
         | JadeNB wrote:
         | You can be the change you want to see by making the kind of
         | comments you'd like to see--hopefully not this sort. I think
         | one can't tell from these summary statistics which articles are
         | posted without context; and there definitely have been numerous
         | Wiki posts that just fall into the "huh, I didn't know that
         | exists, but I'm glad I do now" category that didn't need any
         | additional context to be beneficial, at least for me.
        
         | dang wrote:
         | Wikipedia submissions are ok for HN if and only if something
         | more specific isn't available. It's best to search for
         | something else on the topic first, and if you can't find
         | anything interesting, only then to post the Wikipedia page.
         | 
         | https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&que...
        
       | noitpmeder wrote:
       | Anyone have thoughts on why the number of text stories spiked
       | over 4x at the start of this year?
       | 
       | https://hackernews-insight.vercel.app/overview#How%20many%20...
        
         | downvotetruth wrote:
         | Default changed to yes?
        
       | gardenhedge wrote:
       | Very cool. I think these stats show how hard it is for a web app
       | to grow in terms of users. Less than 1m users even though it's a
       | well known and "mainstream" site.
       | 
       | For comparison, /r/programming has 5m+ users.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2022-12-23 23:01 UTC)