[HN Gopher] Don't force users to register before they can buy (2...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Don't force users to register before they can buy (2015)
        
       Author : acqbu
       Score  : 111 points
       Date   : 2022-12-22 20:35 UTC (2 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.nngroup.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.nngroup.com)
        
       | EvanAnderson wrote:
       | I tend to abandon prospective purchases if I'm forced to make an
       | account.
       | 
       | If it's something I really need and can't get anywhere else (and
       | if I don't intend to have a protracted business relationship with
       | the seller) I usually sign up with snarky addresses (that I still
       | receive) like: SellerDomain-I-hate-that-you-make-me-
       | register@mydomain.com
       | 
       | Not only can I easily squelch all future email from the seller
       | but there's at least a remote chance somebody will recognize my
       | ire and think about their process.
        
         | switchbak wrote:
         | I too will abandon a purchasing quest if they force that crap
         | on me. Doubly so for all those small time sites that make me
         | then log in or add something to my cart just to see a price.
         | 
         | I don't understand how this behaviour can persist when it's
         | customer repellant. (Unless they're optimizing for a different
         | captive market, and really aren't interested in my business).
        
           | crookedview wrote:
           | Sometimes, at least, the 'add to cart for price' is done
           | because the manufacturer or distributor of products will
           | forbid retailers from advertising lower prices on their site.
           | When I worked in an industry that had these policies
           | enforced, the reasoning we were given was that the policy was
           | in place to maintain healthy competition between retailers
           | selling the same products.
        
           | nsxwolf wrote:
           | Sometimes the "add to cart to see price" means you're getting
           | a good price - the manufacturer set a minimum price and
           | they're going below, and they don't want it to show up in
           | searches.
        
             | crooked-v wrote:
             | That's also why the Costco website has lots of "sign in to
             | see the price" pages.
        
               | entropicdrifter wrote:
               | I mean, Costco is already members-only anyhow
        
           | vikingerik wrote:
           | It's repellant for signups, but it's positive that once a
           | customer does sign up, you keep marketing to them for long-
           | term value and future purchases.
           | 
           | The other answer is you optimize for what you can measure.
           | It's hard to know when users are dropping off at the account-
           | signup wall; it's easy to know when an existing user bites on
           | your re-marketing efforts.
        
         | hunter2_ wrote:
         | * * *
        
       | WalterBright wrote:
       | I'm happy that most utility companies don't force me to open an
       | online account to pay. They have a "guest pay" feature. Much
       | appreciated.
       | 
       | I also hate websites where they hide your password while typing
       | it in. Who can enter a password like Xaa3$#%^&*JqUIx correctly
       | while blind? "Three attempts and your account is locked out!"
       | 
       | AAAGGGHHHHH.
        
         | ThunderSizzle wrote:
         | I grew into a habit of writing it to a notepad and copy/pasting
         | if I needed to type a really complicated long password.
        
       | BrianHenryIE wrote:
       | A related bad UX is forcing users who do have accounts to log in
       | to complete their purchase. I wrote a couple of
       | WordPress/WooCommerce plugins to smooth this out - by prompting
       | for login if an account exists matching the email address, and by
       | adding single use passwords to emails sent from the site, so
       | users who visit the site are already logged in when they arrive:
       | 
       | * https://github.com/BrianHenryIE/bh-wp-account-and-login-ux
       | 
       | * https://github.com/BrianHenryIE/bh-wp-autologin-urls
        
         | Spooky23 wrote:
         | A friend consulted at a DMV years ago and improved their online
         | transaction conversions a lot by dropping the login requirement
         | for things like registrations.
         | 
         | Nobody wakes up and decides to pay someone else's car tax. And
         | if they do, if the money is good, who cares?
         | 
         | The other thing is the need for an account at all. With a lot
         | of online merchants, I don't want an ongoing relationship. Take
         | your cash and leave me alone.
        
           | tgsovlerkhgsel wrote:
           | > Nobody wakes up and decides to pay someone else's car tax.
           | 
           | Or they do, because they woke up to a car from a parent who
           | isn't doing this newfangled internet thing but would like the
           | car tax paid.
        
       | colpabar wrote:
       | Don't force me to do anything. Don't force me to make an account,
       | don't force me to uncheck a box to say I don't want you to send
       | me spam, don't tack on "extras" like a youtube subscription that
       | I have to notice and unselect. Let me add stuff to a cart, and
       | then let me pay for it. Don't even ask me to make an account on
       | your site until I have fully completed my purchase, and don't try
       | to trick me into thinking I need one.
       | 
       | The thing about making an account that is so annoying is that I
       | already need at least two accounts to buy something online,
       | usually. I need some kind of account that lets me pay for things,
       | like a credit card or paypal. I then also need an email account
       | to check out, usually.
        
       | ZephyrBlu wrote:
       | Yes. Buying things online has made me realize why friction is so
       | bad. If someone wants to buy, don't waste their time. Let them
       | give you money.
        
         | waynesonfire wrote:
         | There was a recent hackernews[1] post that talked about how
         | great McMaster is. It seems that for consumer retail
         | businesses, a purchase is just one of many many ways the
         | business wants to suck more value out of you. Upselling and
         | giving the marketing team something to do are a priority. It's
         | gross.
         | 
         | The dark patterns have been designed and A-B tested. They must
         | have shown to increase in shareholder value, unfortunately,
         | likely in the short term.
         | 
         | [1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34000502
        
           | tgsovlerkhgsel wrote:
           | Sometime the increase is imaginary, driven by the "good"
           | parts being easily measurable while the "bad" parts (loss of
           | trust, abandoned carts) are not measurable, harder to measure
           | and/or not being measured.
        
       | tinglymintyfrsh wrote:
       | Anything in the way is a conversion fail and leaving money on the
       | table.
       | 
       | And for heck's sake, automatically associate previous guest
       | transactions with a new account when a user finally decides to
       | take the plunge.
        
       | satvikpendem wrote:
       | I want to see the actual conversion statistics. Oftentimes these
       | kinds of patterns emerge because they work, regardless of what
       | people say.
        
       | thecodemonkey wrote:
       | While not strictly e-commerce. This was an important design
       | choice when we designed our spreadsheet upload tool for Geocodio.
       | 
       | It should be possible to go through as much of the process as
       | possible without having to sign up first.
       | 
       | It certainly makes it technically more difficult to develop, but
       | it's incredibly powerful and user friendly.
        
         | gnicholas wrote:
         | We've done the same thing with our Chrome extension. Someone
         | can access our 2 week free trial without so much as entering an
         | email address. We do this partly so it can be easily tried out
         | by young students, partly because it makes things nicer for all
         | users, and partly because it reduces customer support and
         | refund requests.
         | 
         | The downside is that we can't put folks in an e-mail drip
         | campaign, which would help us educate our users and increase
         | our conversion rate. But we hate spam, so we don't view not-
         | spamming as much of a downside.
        
           | nottorp wrote:
           | I'm pretty sure there was one product i abandoned in spite of
           | it being somewhat useful - all because they started to send
           | me tips and tricks emails after i signed up.
        
       | tracker1 wrote:
       | I can't tell you how many times I've done a guest checkout, then
       | come back to register and my order doesn't show up in the
       | history, even if the email matches. Now I make sure to try to
       | register first as it's such a broken experience in too many
       | places if you don't.
        
         | dukoid wrote:
         | Samsung in particular advertises account registration after
         | guest checkout with "register to track your order" -- and then
         | it doesn't work.
        
         | tinglymintyfrsh wrote:
         | One of the dumbest anti-patterns. Even major shopping cart
         | frameworks have this problem such as spree and activemerchant.
         | 
         | The one who gets this mostly right is Shopify. They're the
         | "Stripe" of shopping carts.
        
         | gboss wrote:
         | It's generally not done because it's a security issue as an
         | attacker could register before you with your email and gain
         | access to your personal info (billing and shipping address and
         | maybe last four of credit card). What would be best if the
         | eCommerce site would send you an email to confirm your email
         | address to unlock your guest checkout orders. That's a fairly
         | complicated flow for most eCommerce outfits so I think they
         | just default to not show guest orders.
        
       | suprjami wrote:
       | The 2022 version is not to nag users with a registration flyover
       | for your blog post, the instant the user visits and hasn't even
       | read the first sentence.
       | 
       | I won't visit Medium or Substack blogs at all because of this
       | awful pattern.
        
         | cyberphobe wrote:
         | I used to refuse to use those services, but then I got
         | libredirect [1] which does a great job of decrapifying them and
         | a lot of other anti-user websites.
         | 
         | [1] https://libredirect.codeberg.page
         | 
         | EDIT: I will still attempt to avoid your shitty substack/medium
         | blog if literally any other sources are available. Please stop
         | using this garbage.
        
           | agluszak wrote:
           | Lol, we posted it exactly the same instant
        
         | agluszak wrote:
         | LibRedirect[1] makes these blogs (and other parts of internet)
         | more bearable.
         | 
         | [1] https://libredirect.github.io/
        
       | Ensorceled wrote:
       | On the flip side, people literally go through these kinds of
       | expedited transaction processes and use _my_ email address, so I
       | get receipts, requests to create accounts,  "review the product"
       | emails, etc.
       | 
       | Please validate emails OR let me click on a "that wasn't me"
       | link.
       | 
       | If not, I will flag your email, and company, as spam.
        
         | alias_neo wrote:
         | I went into a sofa store in the UK a few years ago and gave
         | them some details like my email address for a potential
         | purchase which they input into a tablet.
         | 
         | Some time later, I started receiving emails about my sofa
         | purchase, addressed nice and personally to "Paul" (not my name)
         | and then some time after that, emails about my "finance
         | agreement".
         | 
         | It was all legit, except for the fact that none of it was
         | intended for me. Someone had been in to the store after me, and
         | somehow they'd entered my email address on this guys form, he's
         | never had any of his documents about his finance agreement, or
         | when his sofa was going to be delivered, etc, because I had it
         | all.
         | 
         | Hope the guy got his sofa in the end, but company made it
         | almost impossible for me to tell them they were sending all
         | this stuff to the wrong email, in the end I just blocked them.
        
         | suprjami wrote:
         | I am aware of 4 other people who share my name, one of them has
         | an email address one character off from mine.
         | 
         | I've followed their life from their employment offer, maternity
         | leave plans, childbirth hospital trip, baby photos, pet
         | purchases, school registration, and recently their child is
         | registered in a gifted student program. I'm almost part of the
         | family!
        
           | genewitch wrote:
           | at that point (and probably about 10 years ago) i'd have made
           | a different email address on a domain name i own.
           | 
           | gmail, for instance, shows off how awful google is if you
           | stop relying on it but open it fairly often. I don't think
           | i've received any non-automated emails on my gmail account in
           | over a year, but now all of the tabs are chock full of junk,
           | aliexpress, spam, aliexpress, scams, aliexpress...
           | 
           | I lucked out on fastmail grandfathering me in to the $5/yr
           | plan that allows you a single MX domain endpoint, so i have
           | any-email-i-want@mydom.ain for around $20/year including
           | taxes, DNS, and domain registration.
        
         | pugworthy wrote:
         | Is that you Foo?
         | 
         | See https://www.bar.com/ for reference.
        
         | RockRobotRock wrote:
         | Why do people use your email address?
        
           | [deleted]
        
       | pwg wrote:
       | And my related pet-peeve, entry of credit card number comes
       | before display of shipping and handling charges for the order.
       | I've abandoned carts at sites that did not provide S/H before
       | they wanted my credit card number.
        
         | 0cf8612b2e1e wrote:
         | If we are complaining about credit cards, mine is the _large_
         | number of sites that ask for credit card details out of order.
         | Number, then name, then zip code, maybe month /year or some
         | equally cursed implementation. Even better if tabbing between
         | fields is equally random.
         | 
         | Have these designers never looked at their own credit card
         | before? Or is there just an incredible desire to be different
         | that they require a unique take for this already solved
         | problem?
        
           | zeta0134 wrote:
           | I wonder how many of these are intentionally randomizing the
           | form you get during checkout, in an effort to thwart
           | automated purchases by bot accounts. I don't know anything
           | about this space, but I've definitely noticed that my bank
           | does this with its login flow. There's at least a dozen
           | variations and domains I might get redirected to on any given
           | day. Does anyone who works in this space know of a similar
           | practice for online checkout?
        
         | jhallenworld wrote:
         | I'll add to that: always tell customer up front if there is
         | stock or if back-ordered. Burned too many times by the silent
         | back-order.
        
         | crazygringo wrote:
         | Wow, I feel like I buy a lot of stuff online but I don't think
         | I've ever come across that. It sounds super bad.
         | 
         | Is there a particular site or commerce platform that is known
         | for implementing this?
        
           | RajT88 wrote:
           | Those drop-shipper websites which are extremely numerous (and
           | often haven't been running for very long) are quite guilty of
           | this.
           | 
           | They sometimes use this as a way of "bait and switch" - we're
           | sorry, we're out of stock, but if you want to use the credit
           | for this item on other things...
        
         | netsharc wrote:
         | Tried to book a flight a week ago. One site was showing the
         | price 30% less than other sites. Last step, entered my CC info
         | and clicked "Purchase". "Oops, the flight is no longer
         | available for that price, current price: x (the price other
         | sites were showing). Do you want to buy anyway?". To be fair,
         | the dialog with the "Buy anyway" and "Cancel" buttons weren't
         | using any further dark patterns.
         | 
         | No, I would not like to buy anyway, but to welcome to you to
         | the list od websites I'll never use again, [redacted].com...
        
           | amalcon wrote:
           | That looks to be a classic bait-and-switch, which is
           | considered a form of fraudulent advertising in many
           | jurisdictions. It may not be worth the hassle for you, but
           | you probably could report them if you want.
        
             | hunter2_ wrote:
             | Probably depends on whether the entity baiting you is the
             | same as (or represents) the entity you're ultimately
             | purchasing from. If the aggregator is merely redirecting
             | you to the airline and getting a kickback, as opposed to
             | actually being a middleman, maybe that's a loophole in
             | bait-and-switch law?
             | 
             | On the other hand, since GP furnished payment details to
             | the baiter, I guess it really is a middleman, in which case
             | you're absolutely correct.
        
           | crazygringo wrote:
           | That sucks, but to be fair that's not usually intentional,
           | but simply a cached price that hasn't updated. You see this
           | especially with flights for some reason due to the complexity
           | -- airlines change prices incredibly frequently but
           | aggregator sites can't refresh them all instantly. I'd
           | forgive a site if I only saw this happen once/occasionally,
           | but I'd report it to regulators if I saw it happen as a
           | pattern.
        
             | tgsovlerkhgsel wrote:
             | Not updating the cache before/when asking for CC
             | information is at the very least knowingly ignoring the
             | problem, and likely intentionally ignoring the problem
             | because the user is more likely to continue anyway once
             | you've tricked them into giving their CC information and
             | they just need to click yes to be done...
             | 
             | I hope jurisdictions that have "truth in advertising" laws
             | bring the hammer down on such "negligent" violations.
        
             | hunter2_ wrote:
             | With how laggy those sites are, I figured they are indeed
             | pulling the price from the origin... Interesting that
             | they'd have their own cache and still be so slow.
        
           | Marazan wrote:
           | Unfortunately the airline industry is both filled with caches
           | upon caches upon caches when it comes to prices and also
           | deceptive dark patterns.
           | 
           | The dark patterns have got better over time (as meta-search
           | like Skyscanner and Kayak drive so much traffic to sites and
           | demand honest pricing - travel agents either have to clean up
           | their act or forgo meta search traffic) but the many, many
           | layers of caches remain.
        
       | gnicholas wrote:
       | I find it especially creepy when I start checking out as a guest,
       | decide not to proceed (often due to usurious "shipping and
       | handling" charges), and then get an email about my abandoned
       | cart.
       | 
       | I get why companies do this, but IMO if I enter my email address
       | and have not given permission for it to be used except for a
       | given transaction, then it shouldn't be used at all if the
       | transaction isn't ratified.
       | 
       | It's one step removed from tracking character input in a text box
       | and capturing an email address that was subsequently deleted
       | prior to submitting a form.
        
         | lmm wrote:
         | If you're in the EU, GDPR provides you with a mechanism to go
         | after companies that do this, although the details for how you
         | do that will be country-specific.
        
         | philote wrote:
         | If you think that's bad, I worked at a company that didn't
         | always need your email address. Their customer sites would add
         | their third-party cookie, so if you enter your email on any of
         | their customer sites they could send you a cart abandonment
         | email (I don't think you even had to SUBMIT your email, as it
         | would be sent to the server as soon as it looked like a valid
         | email). Fortunately I quit working for them once they started
         | going down that evil route.
        
       | fendy3002 wrote:
       | From design standpoint, how do we design for user-related
       | interactions though, like tracking /reviewing the purchase,
       | informing when some error / failure happen in the middle,
       | purchase receipt etc?
        
         | bell-cot wrote:
         | Thank you for your order, Guest!
         | 
         | Your Order Number is 123456789
         | 
         | Your Order PIN is 12345
         | 
         | With your Order Number _and_ Order PIN, you can review or track
         | your order  >HERE<.
         | 
         | Please note that we have no way to reach you if any problem
         | occurs with your order, _unless you review your order_.
         | 
         | Click >HERE< for a printable receipt. (It will NOT show your
         | PIN.)
        
         | tgsovlerkhgsel wrote:
         | The user probably provided an e-mail address. Tracking link
         | goes there.
        
       | scoofy wrote:
       | As someone who started a wiki... yea... people _really_ don 't
       | want to make accounts. The second I started letting people just
       | edit things without being logged in, the wiki immediately became
       | dramatically more useful to everyone. I was worried about
       | vandalism, but it's really not an issue exactly because nobody
       | actually cares about the site at all.
       | 
       | It's a golf wiki if anyone is curious: https://golfcourse.wiki
        
         | willchis wrote:
         | This is cool! Just added my local course.
        
       | MinaMe wrote:
       | [flagged]
        
       | zouhair wrote:
       | I stopped counting the times I abandoned a purchase for this same
       | reason.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2022-12-22 23:00 UTC)