[HN Gopher] Productivity Blocker
___________________________________________________________________
Productivity Blocker
Author : JohnHendrix
Score : 598 points
Date : 2022-12-17 16:14 UTC (2 days ago)
(HTM) web link (www.productivityblocker.com)
(TXT) w3m dump (www.productivityblocker.com)
| auggierose wrote:
| I've found just using ScreenTime on macOS during the time where I
| need to get stuff done is very useful. It is a bit hidden,
| because you have to enable "Limit Adult Websites", but then you
| can configure sites you want to block. My list is:
|
| ycombinator.com
|
| guardian.co.uk
|
| theguardian.com
|
| nytimes.com
|
| spiegel.de
|
| Works wonders! It really helps for these little breaks where you
| automatically go to a site subconsciously. And none of these
| sites are useful for what I do, except HN sometimes to look up
| information and pointers about technical topics.
| mattmanser wrote:
| Looks like you didn't actually look at the link :)
| auggierose wrote:
| I actually did. Clicked on it once, looked at it for about 3
| seconds, decided it would be a waste of my time to check it
| out more.
| nunodonato wrote:
| Which means you didn't actually understand what it was
| about, which was the point of the comment ;)
| auggierose wrote:
| I don't disagree. Understanding things takes time, and
| most things are not worth understanding them.
| gnrl wrote:
| And then you feel it's not a waste of time to write a
| comment on an article you took 3sec to understand and
| skip?
| jdhdjdbdjdbd wrote:
| u stoopid
| KomoD wrote:
| Spent more time writing these pointless comments
| auggierose wrote:
| > The greatest trick that javascript ever pulled was to
| convince the latest generation of programmers that it was
| fast...
|
| By the way, JavaScript IS quite fast. I ported some code from
| Swift to Typescript recently, and its runtime went down from
| 15 seconds to 2 seconds. It wasn't a 1-1 port because I
| improved things, so it is not a fair comparison, but I was
| very positively surprised.
| mattmanser wrote:
| > It wasn't a 1-1 port because I improved things
|
| Hmm, I think we found the reason....
| gnarbarian wrote:
| this basically a federal job simulator
| oliwary wrote:
| Brilliant, I feel like many could benefit from this on the
| weekends.
|
| In the same vein, "Do nothing" by self-help Singh:
| https://youtu.be/8An2SxNFvmU
| redbar0n wrote:
| This will save Christmas.
| braingenious wrote:
| Love the idea of TEDx somehow being productive in a professional
| sense.
| kellyharsh wrote:
| glotchimo wrote:
| Something like this might actually be useful for the all-too-
| common productive procrastination breaks. Stuck on a hard
| problem? Better clean my desk. Waiting for a build? Better clean
| my files. Lacking momentum? Better check LinkedIn (it's
| professional so it's okay). I wonder which type of "break" kills
| more productivity, "fun" distraction or "productive" distraction.
| Anyone else?
| p1necone wrote:
| I'm similar, but replace the answer to all of those questions
| with "make a coffee".
|
| I feel sorry for my kidneys.
| lofatdairy wrote:
| There's probably an argument to be made that at least those
| tasks might help push you out of a rut if you've spent hours
| banging your head against a wall. God knows cleaning my desk is
| probably a better use of my time right now than commenting yet
| again on HN.
| p1necone wrote:
| When I'm working on a hard problem and I identify that I
| actually do need to stop and just think about it more
| indirectly I find going for a walk to be pretty useful.
| glotchimo wrote:
| Yeah I've certainly heard that doing something small can help
| get the engine going, but anecdotally, it totally goes both
| ways. I've had afternoons where I clean something or what
| have you and get right back to it and others where I clean
| something and end up changing the capitalization of symbols
| for no reason.
| sharkweek wrote:
| > Better check LinkedIn (it's professional so it's okay)
|
| I don't have social media on my work computer except LinkedIn.
| I can't tell you how many times a day I quickly open a new tab
| and head to LinkedIn (where I'm not even that personally
| active, mind you) to just get a quick hit of a distraction.
| mbappe123 wrote:
| LinkedIn and other medias are not at all distracting, if your
| job is on those platforms. Or you get your traffic through
| those platforms.
| gnicholas wrote:
| Yeah I moved the LinkedIn app to the front page of my home
| screen when I went to a conference a couple months ago. I
| check it much more when it's right there. Thanks to your
| comment, I'm going to move it back to where it was before,
| buried in a folder on the fourth page.
| samstave wrote:
| Reddit may be the all time king in productivity blockers...
| Sebb767 wrote:
| Probably "productive" distractions, since you can do them a lot
| more before feeling bad and going back to work. Especially if
| you can silently get into the "fun" territory.
|
| I've actually had this with HN in the last days; I've ditched
| Reddit for HN because it contained a lot more worthwile content
| and valuable discussions [0], but with the Twitter shitshow
| I've come to enjoy a lot of snarky, unproductive discussions
| again. Maybe it's time to enable noprocast.
|
| [0] Actually, it was mostly ideological reasons, but having HN
| as a "drop-in" replacement/upgrade helped a lot.
| kettleballroll wrote:
| > I've ditched Reddit for HN because it contained a lot more
| worthwile content
|
| I found that at least for myself, this was just a lie I kept
| telling myself. HN contains almost zero actionable content,
| and I've not been an epsilon better off for reading it. I
| come to see it as infotainment.
| electrondood wrote:
| HN comments are less sarcastic, cynical, info-free than
| Reddit comments.
| rjh29 wrote:
| Some HNers believe the site is superior to Reddit, if you
| compare it to the smaller and high quality subs, there
| isn't any difference.
| [deleted]
| asddubs wrote:
| there's been a few times where I read something that I was
| really glad I found out about through here, and probably
| wouldn't have found out otherwise. But yeah, easily >99% of
| it is just passing time
| antihero wrote:
| I've discovered a bunch of neat libraries and projects
| through it.
| tracker1 wrote:
| It varies... I'll often see mention of interesting/useful
| tools/sites/applications mentioned in more technical
| discussion. I don't always find these things immediately
| useful, but often even a year later if I can remember
| enough to search and find what I was looking for. Sometimes
| just knowing something exists in extremely useful.
| eastbound wrote:
| HN was my MBA back in 2010-2013, that's where I learnt how
| to create a working startup. There were blogs like
| Kalzumeus or Joel On Software, people were still debating
| technical or business issues about startups.
|
| Now it's more a news aggregator. It's my fault too, I don't
| blog about the company I've created, and people can learn
| how to create proper startups in many places.
| VLM wrote:
| HN is great for discovery but 90%+ of the comments have
| declined to ChatGPT levels.
| Bedon292 wrote:
| For me the benefit is honestly just less content. There is
| only so much that makes it to the front page here and the
| lack of infinite scroll means I rarely see beyond it. It
| helps me waste a lot less time. But reddit was also a real
| problem for me. Way too many hours each day and I had to
| quit it.
| philippejara wrote:
| "oh I need to structurally modify these 20 lines, might as
| well craft a regex to do it"
|
| 30 minutes later... well got to keep my regex skills up to
| date else i'll lose them
| mrcartmeneses wrote:
| I made a resolution to just close my eyes instead of going on
| Reddit/HN. Went well for about 20 mins...
| LAC-Tech wrote:
| Yeah, HN is such a double edged sword. Great technical
| discussions as well as time sucking passive aggressive
| discussions about "divisive social issues", which I cannot
| help but click.
|
| Wrote this script today, that just stops me seeing
| submissions from sites I know won't have good technical
| discussions. Might be useful for others.
| const boringDomains = ["twitter.com", "newyorker.com",
| "nytimes.com"]
| Array.from(document.querySelectorAll(".titleline > a"))
| .filter(elem => boringDomains.some(domain =>
| elem.href.includes(domain))) .map(elem =>
| elem.parentElement.parentElement.parentElement)
| .flatMap(elem => [ elem,
| elem.nextElementSibling,
| elem.nextElementSibling.nextElementSibling] )
| .forEach(elem => elem.remove())
| tracker1 wrote:
| Have to admit, the change to Twitter in terms of personality
| the past few months has been as fun as Twitter around a
| decade ago... I mean, a lot more snark, memes and generally
| fun. Not perfect, but definitely more entertaining than when
| people were getting banned for parody accounts.
| Cthulhu_ wrote:
| > Probably "productive" distractions, since you can do them a
| lot more before feeling bad and going back to work.
| Especially if you can silently get into the "fun" territory.
|
| I feel like this is the case for a lot of productivity tools;
| every once in a while I find myself browsing the status-quo
| of the next generation of todo apps that have had far too
| much design work spent on their website for what it does. 9
| times out of 10 it's a grift to sell a $15 / month
| subscription for syncing across devices and its added value
| is tiny compared to just using a text editor, lol.
| [deleted]
| vidarh wrote:
| Whenever I feel too tired to focus on something "productive" is
| when I clean the house, because most of my productive work
| involves thinking and most of the tidying/cleaning is a set of
| repetitive tasks that I can do on "autopilot" and so ironically
| I find it easier to carry them out when I'm too tired to get
| caught up thinking about software projects.
|
| But the tricky part is remembering to nudge myself into
| _starting_ tidying etc..
| noduerme wrote:
| The kind where you start reading code you wrote more than 3
| years ago and obsessively changing it...
| barthelomew wrote:
| Yes ofcourse, that side project I haven't touched for 3 years
| now obviously needs a full rewrite in the new
| language/framework I've been learning.
| silasdavis wrote:
| Since using productivity blocker I've consistently done less than
| I used to before. Can't recommend it enough is enough.
| qvrjuec wrote:
| Unfortunately, my dopamine seeking monkey brain would just open
| another browser and successfully procrastinate if the only thing
| stopping me were a chrome extension. That's why I use
| selfcontrol: https://selfcontrolapp.com/
| paco3346 wrote:
| This is the opposite- it's for blocking access to productive
| sites thereby helping you procrastinate.
| INTPenis wrote:
| We used to do this in the firewall at my first job. Every weekend
| the founder of the company would get drunk and login to servers
| and mess things up. So every weekend it was my job as the junior
| to go into our FreeBSD firewall and uncomment or update an ipfw
| line that blocked his IP-address.
| samwillis wrote:
| I assume you are really talking about your current job at
| Twitter...
| raspberry1337 wrote:
| I don't think so, considering how Twitter is somehow running
| _better_ with 80 percent of personnel removed
| rjh29 wrote:
| You could be right, but it's not like a large software
| project instantly falls apart if people leave. It'll keep
| running for a while but cracks will start to develop and
| nobody will be around to patch them up.
| raspberry1337 wrote:
| Aha. And what if someone is there, from the remaining
| 20%, to patch them up?
| rjh29 wrote:
| Those people are going to have to work a lot of overtime
| I guess? We'll see :)
| distcs wrote:
| > I don't think so, considering how Twitter is somehow
| running better with 80 percent of personnel removed reply
|
| I believe you are getting downvoted (and now flagged and
| removed from the thread) for not substantiating your
| comment. HN does not seem to like single-line comments that
| do not provide info.
|
| But I have to ask. Do you have any info or stats that shows
| that Twitter is really running _better_? By what metrics is
| it running better? Honest question.
| alwayseasy wrote:
| A drop of 75%-80% in revenue doesn't seem like its anyone's
| definition of "running better".
| mrzool wrote:
| Bold of you to assume Elon Musk would be able to use ssh.
| kramerger wrote:
| I know you are joking but Tesla had an entire team devoted to
| making sure Elon does not fuck up important things.
|
| I believe it is well documented that critical personnel were
| hidden when he was visiting the factories to avoid getting
| them rage-fired
| brezelgoring wrote:
| I want to believe this but I can't find a source, can you
| share where you've read this?
| kramerger wrote:
| These stories came from a former Tesla manager. But if
| you want a reputable source:
|
| https://www.wired.com/story/elon-musk-tesla-life-inside-
| giga...
| brezelgoring wrote:
| Thank you, that was a nice read.
|
| Good day to you, kramerger.
| moduspol wrote:
| > I want to believe this but I can't find a source
|
| "Claims about Elon Musk since the Twitter takeover" in a
| nutshell.
| anonporridge wrote:
| "In war, truth is the first casualty."
| raspberry1337 wrote:
| culanuchachamim wrote:
| I love how it looks that who wrote this got inspired more
| and more while writing this.
|
| He starts with things that you say: Wow, amazing, but
| totally logical.
|
| The he continues with things that you say: Wow, no waaay,
| Musk is really that crazy?
|
| And by the end (the slave/master) you realize it's
| sarcasm.
|
| But hilarious!
| [deleted]
| benstrumental wrote:
| I want to believe this but I can't find a source, can you
| share where you've read this?
| adwn wrote:
| I suspect it's sarcasm:
|
| > _PayPal had an automatic github-algorithm [...] before
| they managed to coup him as CEO_
|
| Musk stepped down as CEO of PayPal in 2000, predating not
| just Github, but git itself by 5 years.
| r3to wrote:
| Musk has never been CEO of PayPal
| gadders wrote:
| It's satire.
| davemp wrote:
| It's a shitpost, which really doesn't belong on HN.
| fernandotakai wrote:
| a bit meta, but it feels like since musk bought twitter,
| there have been too many shitposts/unfounded rumors about
| him that do not belong here.
| ddevault wrote:
| Fun is occasionally permitted on HN. This thread is about
| a joke add-on in the first place, you know.
| [deleted]
| retSava wrote:
| Sure it wasn't a weird grazing ritual? A cron script would've
| replaced you doing that, more efficiently and reliably.
|
| When I did military service abroad, the new chefs rotating down
| was put on "sandwich alert" in which anyone on camp signal
| centers could call in the middle of the night, requesting a
| nice sandwich delivered. It was all fun and games, they were
| shortly let in on the thing and we all laughed at it
| afterwards. No-one abused it.
| INTPenis wrote:
| Naw, I used to party with the founder. It got wild.
|
| The problem back then in 2004-2005 was that his DSL could
| give him a new IP lease anytime so it couldn't really be
| automated away without having a dyndns script running on his
| computer, which would never work.
| deelly wrote:
| > No-one abused it.
|
| Honest question: how can you be 100% sure?
| retSava wrote:
| Well I can't really, just hearsay. We were just a battalion
| and most were out on diverse smaller camps or manning
| checkpoints and the like, so we weren't that many that even
| could abuse it. And, it's a kind of abuse in essence
| really, so we can probably reverse my statement.
| xupybd wrote:
| I've been using Freedom for this for some time. I would recommend
| using these tools.
|
| When you site down and want to get something done you just block
| out a few hours where you can't access the sites that distract
| you. It is really good for focus. I thought I could do this with
| will power alone but these sorts of tools really do help.
| [deleted]
| mark_l_watson wrote:
| I agree, I have been using https://freedom.io for a few years
| and like it. I also enjoy their podcasts.
| lanamo wrote:
| the URL is https://freedom.to
| mark_l_watson wrote:
| thanks!
| fergie wrote:
| I think you missed the point.
| xupybd wrote:
| I see that now, thanks!
| gautamdivgi wrote:
| Does freedom allow you to block apps? I have it and it works
| nicely for safari and my Mac. I haven't been successful in
| trying to have it block apps. Maybe because I have an ancient
| iPhone.
| occamschainsaw wrote:
| It allows you to install a vpn on iOS that blocks traffic to
| domains on your blocklist, effectively blocking apps (unless
| you download things offline like YouTube videos or Podcasts).
| rockbruno wrote:
| Apple added official app blocking APIs in iOS 16, so you
| don't need to use someone's sketchy VPN anymore. Burnout
| Buddy is an app that uses this.
|
| (disclaimer: self-promotion, I made it)
| Sebb767 wrote:
| I'm somewhat disappointed that there is no Firefox version.
| However, given that the author most likely uses his extension, I
| can see what might have happened.
| jonas-w wrote:
| I always thought firefox and chrome share a standard where you
| could build one extension and use them on both platforms?
| pinusc wrote:
| AFAIK WebExtensions APIs are mostly compatible but the
| developer still has to do some setup to make them work on
| both
| Terretta wrote:
| Here's a discussion of doing that for V2:
|
| https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Mozilla/Add-
| ons/Web...
|
| To your point, the Orion _webkit-based_ browser for MacOS
| supports both:
|
| https://browser.kagi.com/
|
| AFAIK, the only webkit browser to do so.
| coffee_cup wrote:
| There's leechblock
| culi wrote:
| I use leechblock. It's pretty great. It's extremely feature
| rich. The UI is a little ugly but "ugly" in the style that a
| hackernewser would likely appreciate.
|
| My only complaint is the way it does this thing when you're
| out of time and it redirects you (either to their block page
| or a custom page you set up). Not sure how it does it but the
| original url you tried to reach doesn't get saved in your
| history. If I try to manually disable the extension it'll
| also automatically close the page with the leechblock message
| so it's gone forever. Kind of annoying if it's a link I'd
| like to revisit after work
|
| Other than it's pretty neat
| tomxor wrote:
| I love that Slack is the first icon on the list :D it's kind of
| true though, It's probably the worst offender.
| Kiro wrote:
| Worst offender as in making you the most productive? I'm pretty
| sure that's not the case. I'm not even sure it qualifies to be
| on the list. If anything it's a distraction making you less
| productive.
| tomxor wrote:
| I agree. I somehow inverted the purpose of this plugin in my
| head. Feels weird to be upvoted because people disagree with
| you.
| djmips wrote:
| "first Chrome extension for blocking any website that makes you
| productive. "
| dncosta wrote:
| Reddit still takes the crown - cross browser and no extensions
| needed.
| r-spaghetti wrote:
| Who needs a productivity blocker if you have Microsoft Windows?
| retSava wrote:
| Good news! Your computer is ready for Windows 11! And how about
| a nice game of Solitude Candy Smackers (TM)? Have you tried the
| new Microsoft Edge web browser? It's not a browser, it's a
| WOWser!
| spkm wrote:
| "Got it!"
| Terretta wrote:
| Narrator: It's still Chrome.
| zidad wrote:
| ...And then let me bother you with the lated MSNBS celebrity
| nonsense in your start menu when you're trying to find an
| application
| Cthulhu_ wrote:
| > It's not a browser, it's a WOWser!
|
| I just died a little inside; well done :D
| retSava wrote:
| Actually, it's real. I started getting spam emails from
| some new browser vendor, a contact of mine apparently had
| shared their contacts with them. They used that line, "it's
| a WOWser".
|
| edit: Rock Melt, anno pre-2012, perhaps 2010.
| throwaway019254 wrote:
| Honestly, I'm not even sure if this is a parody or not.
| brailsafe wrote:
| I got mid 90s (80s?) Steve Ballmer vibes
| YetAnotherNick wrote:
| I think they need to redirect those sites to HN for maximum
| effect.
| donatj wrote:
| I always end up on GitHub opening tiny PRs when I'm trying to
| relax.
| CAPSLOCKSSTUCK wrote:
| Love the reviews.
| flimflamm wrote:
| I want an unproductivity blocker
| [deleted]
| thenerdhead wrote:
| This better keep me off GitHub, my leisure time is at risk here!
| guzik wrote:
| I thought it has something in common with the Spotify.
| [deleted]
| ninjin-carh wrote:
| I have found Leechblock useful in Firefox - it allows blocking or
| a delay before showing a page with a reminder this is a time
| waster site.... https://addons.mozilla.org/en-
| US/firefox/addon/leechblock-ng...
| taauji wrote:
| Leechblock is incredibly helpful and has saved my innumerable
| amount of unproductive hours. It is highly customisable.
| artemonster wrote:
| I love this addon!
| Lapsa wrote:
| yeah, whatever. did chuckle at "wish it worked on Safari"
| though...
| TapWaterBandit wrote:
| Heidegger would approve.
| dopidopHN wrote:
| Looks like a "fun" one but in all seriousness: self-control2 do
| the same thing except you have to feed it the list of blocked
| website.
|
| Then technically it's harder to circonvent. ( it's at the /host
| file level I think. I don't really wanna know so i cannot work
| around it.
| rnmp wrote:
| Love the sentiment here. Whoever is reading this should try
| disabling all notifications ever.
|
| There really isn't a need to know when someone messages you or
| you get news.
|
| Doing this helps you focus more both for work but also for chill
| time.
| Brajeshwar wrote:
| Totally agree with this. I have been advocating this since 2014
| and points to my article whenever someone asks me. It needs an
| update but the general idea is still valid. I do have
| notifications for some key specific events such as Health,
| timed events in the calendar, and selected people who can call,
| etc but otherwise it is pretty quite almost all the time.
|
| https://brajeshwar.com/2014/missing-step-productivity-activi...
| codeproject wrote:
| There seems to be an error in the first paragraph. Introducing
| productivity blocker, The first Chrome extension for blocking any
| website that make you productive. should the word "productive" be
| unproductive?
| daquisu wrote:
| That's the joke. You can scroll down below to see the reviews
| talking about how unproductive they are while using the
| extension.
|
| But good you at least opened the link and raised the question,
| there a lot of people here supposing it is a blocker to be more
| productive.
| codeproject wrote:
| thanks, i never got to the bottom part of page.
| nottorp wrote:
| Neither did I. I stopped at the fake star ratings. Looks to
| me that they kinda failed.
|
| Edit: Oh wait. It looks like i read the whole page. But
| didn't pay attention because I skimmed through the text and
| I never even looked at the icons. Not that I can recognize
| most of them.
|
| I'm really not the target audience for this kind of product
| page...
| Ftuuky wrote:
| No.
| 6510 wrote:
| before you can be productive you need to be unproductive first.
| vdwijngaert wrote:
| Wanted to share this with the team, but I noticed the social
| cards aren't loading (at least not on slack). It's probably due
| to the fact that your social images are not on HTTPS:
|
| ```html <meta property="og:site_name" content="Productivity
| Blocker"/> (...) <meta property="og:image" content="http://static
| 1.squarespace.com/static/61e76afa9e2d33114d3da2... (...) <meta
| itemprop="thumbnailUrl" content="http://static1.squarespace.com/s
| tatic/61e76afa9e2d33114d3da2... <link rel="image_src" href="http:
| //static1.squarespace.com/static/61e76afa9e2d33114d3da2..." />
| <meta itemprop="image" content="http://static1.squarespace.com/st
| atic/61e76afa9e2d33114d3da2... (...) <meta name="twitter:image" c
| ontent="http://static1.squarespace.com/static/61e76afa9e2d33114d3
| da2... ```
|
| Love it though! :)
| nunodonato wrote:
| The comments here give us a good idea on how many people leave a
| comment without actually opening/reading the page :')
| ninjin-carh wrote:
| LOL. I did read it but thought it was suggesting slack etc were
| blocking productivity hence helped focus.
| culi wrote:
| Same. it has pages like TEDx and Fiverr which I don't
| typically consider productivity sites...
| Waterluvian wrote:
| In a bout of blasphemy, I'd like to be slightly productive and
| learn something:
|
| The page header renders the "Y" in "Productivity" on a new line
| because mobile. Is there a reliable CSS method to say, "pick
| whatever font size fills the parent width without wrapping"?
| dubcanada wrote:
| Assuming the container is some percentage of the viewport you
| can use viewport units. Otherwise no you need JS sadly. Or a
| SVG.
| prox wrote:
| I can't believe it's 2022, we getting closer to fusion power,
| but we still need JS for something like this. Crazy!
|
| Hopefully the spirit of future christmas shows the w3c how to
| do this :)
| samwillis wrote:
| This is turning into an interesting test case of how many HN
| readers actually read (properly) the page before commenting...
| jonas-w wrote:
| Because of those legit reviews, that you ignore at first
| because who even reads these picked out reviews and then start
| to realize what is written there?
| jonas-w wrote:
| Oh nevermind
| linhns wrote:
| Gotta tip my hat to this. Someone actually spends time to do all
| these
| neontomo wrote:
| I enjoy the humour in this. Well done.
| satysin wrote:
| It is my brain in Chrome extension form :P
| spaceman_2020 wrote:
| Whoever wrote the copy for this is brilliant
| samwillis wrote:
| Links at the bottom of the page, the creators are accomplished
| advising creatives and copywriters.
| eyelidlessness wrote:
| It took a full ten seconds for my eyes to see normal color again.
| They can use that as a testimonial if they like.
| schipplock wrote:
| yes! same with me :). Funny effect.
| rising-sky wrote:
| Will it block Hacker News?, cause god knows this is a huge
| productivity block... like right now
| Kiro wrote:
| If HN is a productivity block it should be promoted when using
| this, not blocked. The point of this extension is to block
| everything _making_ you productive, so that you can
| procrastinate and slack off more.
| fragmede wrote:
| HN supports this natively! Enable noprocrast in your profile
| voiper1 wrote:
| TIL. Information on this:
| https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=814695
| joelthelion wrote:
| Rather than blocking things, I've found it more efficient to use
| the pomodoro technique and commit to no interruptions during
| working sessions. A 25-minute session is short enough, so that's
| a realistic commitment.
|
| I try to do at least one session in the morning, no matter how
| bad I feel. Usually it's sufficient to put me back into the zone,
| after which I don't need any tools or frameworks to keep me
| going.
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2022-12-19 23:02 UTC)