[HN Gopher] Science Images of 2022
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Science Images of 2022
        
       Author : belter
       Score  : 105 points
       Date   : 2022-12-16 10:26 UTC (12 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.nature.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.nature.com)
        
       | rozab wrote:
       | Most of these images are mercilessly cropped to the screen size
       | of whatever device you happen to be viewing it on. On mobile I
       | could only see less than a quarter of some of the landscapes.
       | Even on desktop, I had to mess around with the shape of my
       | browser window to see the full images.
       | 
       | It endlessly frustrates me that web designers have decided that
       | anything going on outside the very center of an image doesn't
       | matter.
        
         | enriquto wrote:
         | Moreover, there is no easy way to download and see the whole
         | image once you notice this problem. Even if you try to look at
         | the page source, the reference to the image is extremely
         | obfuscated (on purpose?).
        
           | b4je7d7wb wrote:
           | I don't think it's on purpose. It's probably just because of
           | the overengineered parallax effects.
        
         | jdthedisciple wrote:
         | But hey it looks super fancy, the scrolling and all!
         | 
         | /s
        
       | regularjack wrote:
       | Some commenters here dislike the scrolling effects on the site. I
       | usually also can't stand sites that mess with scroll, but here I
       | found it to be tastefully done. I think it added to the
       | experience, and didn't get in the way.
        
       | samhuk wrote:
       | Couple points:
       | 
       | * I really like all of the. As just "photographs", they seem all
       | very pretty, detailed, some even awe-inspiring, to me.
       | 
       | * Is it just me (I'm not in any way a photography guy), or are so
       | many of these photos extremely over-edited with extra color to
       | make them more appealing? EDIT: The visible-light photos
       | 
       | * Veritasium did an amazing video on how the black hole image was
       | made. It honestly made radio astronomy "click" for me, finally
       | after many years: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q1bSDnuIPbo
       | 
       | * Scrolling through that gave off a strong ex-Apple web developer
       | smell. Why add such complex scrolling behavior where it isn't
       | necessary?
       | 
       | * I appreciate the message and everything, and it's a _fantastic_
       | and indeed hypnotic image, but what does the 2022 Russian
       | invasion of Ukraine have anything, in particular, to do with
       | science? Yes some Ukrainian scientists have been displaced. Some
       | scientific institutions and faculties too, but the image isn 't
       | even about that. Feels a bit like they could have done their
       | "send our best regards" bit in a better way, IMHO. Am I being a
       | bit overly pedantic/negative here? I don't know...
        
         | poszlem wrote:
         | I agree with almost all the points, especially the last one.
         | The first half of the gallery is mind blowing and really
         | focused. The second half is as if someone decided that "we
         | cannot just show photos from STEM fields, we need to add some
         | human touch of social sciences" (which, having worked for a
         | major scientific publisher in the past, I am will to bet was
         | exactly what has happened).
         | 
         | Re. them being over-edited - I wonder if the reason for that is
         | because many of those would not have any colours in them if it
         | wasn't for the editing (because they were taken using X-rays
         | for example).
        
           | samhuk wrote:
           | Ah, I meant the visible-light photos. Edited comment :)
           | 
           | And yes, I am a bit surprised by some of the photos,
           | particularly towards the end. I've never been involved in the
           | science publishing scene, so to me it just looks...strange.
        
         | mistermann wrote:
         | > but what does the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine have
         | anything, in particular, to do with science?
         | 
         | Probably not what the author had in mind, but two reasons I can
         | think of off the top of my head:
         | 
         | - science has played a pivotal role in the development of the
         | various weapons humans use to kill each other
         | 
         | - had humanity decided to invest more of its resources in "the
         | humanities" instead of the hard sciences, perhaps we wouldn't
         | still be behaving like this in 2022, or at least have higher
         | quality arguments about such matters
        
         | bearmode wrote:
         | >Yes some Ukrainian scientists have been displaced. Some
         | scientific institutions and faculties too, but the image isn't
         | even about that. Feels a bit like they could have done their
         | "send our best regards" bit in a better way, IMHO. Am I being a
         | bit overly pedantic/negative here? I don't know...
         | 
         | Not to mention how ignored so many other human tragedies that
         | happened away from the West have been.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2022-12-16 23:01 UTC)