[HN Gopher] Selfish Writing (2018)
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Selfish Writing (2018)
        
       Author : kiyanwang
       Score  : 51 points
       Date   : 2022-12-16 10:06 UTC (12 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (collabfund.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (collabfund.com)
        
       | Ozzie_osman wrote:
       | A lot of smart people tell you to read. It's great advice. Even
       | better is to write. Putting your thoughts into words helps you
       | crystallize your thoughts, scrutinize them, remember them better,
       | etc.
       | 
       | I wish someone had given me the advice to "write more" earlier in
       | my career. (Note that I now maintain a blog and have written a
       | book).
        
         | Slow_Hand wrote:
         | So much this. I've been a lifelong voracious reader and only
         | recently have I started to take writing seriously as a way to
         | determine what I really think. I am now far more articulate,
         | rigorous, and confident in my own beliefs than I have ever
         | been.
         | 
         | Taking the time to write down what I am thinking really puts it
         | up into the light and better equips me for communicating my
         | point of view to others in a way that is robust, concise, and
         | internally consistent. Even if they will never read what I've
         | written.
        
       | endofunctor91 wrote:
        
       | knlb2022 wrote:
       | As much as I enjoy writing to think, simply writing doesn't lead
       | to reality testing -- I've found even greater clarity by trying
       | to add numbers or simulations and trying to program around what
       | I'm writing. Writing with real data intertwined and numbers
       | applied is much better.
        
         | ivan_ah wrote:
         | Agreed. I'm currently working on a book on statistics[1] and
         | keep discovering slight (and not so slight) misconceptions in
         | my thinking thanks to the "optional" code examples and
         | demonstrations. In the end, it seems the code examples won't be
         | optional at all, but essential for understanding.
         | 
         | It's the same with many science and tech subjects. You don't
         | really know it until you can code it. I'm intentionally
         | converting some of the derivations/experiments into exercises
         | for readers to complete on their own, so they can also benefit
         | from this learning process.
         | 
         | [1] https://nobsstats.com/
        
           | karencarits wrote:
           | I fully agree with you, but as a warning: most people are
           | lazy, so if valuable points are hidden in exercises for the
           | reader, there is a significant chance that many will miss
           | them
        
         | k__ wrote:
         | True.
         | 
         | Being a developer in addition to being a writer helped
         | tremendously.
         | 
         | That way, I was able to really try out more than just basic
         | stuff and then write about it.
        
         | the-printer wrote:
         | I gather that I am not adjacent to your field of practice by
         | any means but this resonates with me deeply.
        
         | lo_zamoyski wrote:
         | That can work, but it depends on what you're writing about.
         | Different methods apply in different situations. But good
         | writing has at the very least the advantage of doing what the
         | article notes: it forces you to take what are vague convictions
         | and impressions and justify them. You start to notice gaps in
         | knowledge, inferential leaps, and logical inconsistencies. Only
         | then, and only in empirical settings, do numbers come into play
         | because they need to be motivated by and understood within some
         | prior context. (Even when your writing begins with some number,
         | that number is contextualized in your mind.) Of course, good
         | writing presupposes humility and integrity or else you risk
         | rationalizing and bullshitting.
        
       | gringoDan wrote:
       | Fully agree. Some of what we today consider to be the canon of
       | Western philosophy was never meant to be shared widely.
       | 
       | Many of Aristotle's "writings" were just student-created notes of
       | his teachings.
       | 
       | Meditations, from Marcus Aurelius, is a collection of notes to
       | himself on how to best govern as emperor.
        
       | simonw wrote:
       | I've been publishing weeknotes about once a week for a couple of
       | years now.
       | 
       | They're selfish writing, for me. I use them to hold myself
       | accountable for making progress on my various projects.
       | 
       | I don't particularly care if anyone else reads them.
       | 
       | Where they do come in useful is linking people to things. I can
       | say "I write something about that last year" and point back to my
       | weeknotes.
       | 
       | https://simonwillison.net/tags/weeknotes/
        
       | paulpauper wrote:
       | _Howard Marks' book The Most Important Thing has sold three-
       | quarters of a million copies. I don't know what the list of all-
       | time best-selling investment books looks like, but that is up
       | there._
       | 
       | It's always the same pattern with this blog: find a single
       | success and then generalize it to everything, ignoring the
       | obvious survivorship bias. The vast majority of books do not sell
       | well, no matter what technique is used. Writing for yourself is
       | good, but ideally you want other people to be interested too if
       | your goal is to actually make money.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2022-12-16 23:00 UTC)