[HN Gopher] Facebook Failed to Stop Ads Threatening Election Wor...
___________________________________________________________________
Facebook Failed to Stop Ads Threatening Election Workers
Author : sizzle
Score : 17 points
Date : 2022-12-05 19:48 UTC (3 hours ago)
(HTM) web link (www.nytimes.com)
(TXT) w3m dump (www.nytimes.com)
| sizzle wrote:
| Non-paywall link: http://archive.today/FOANs
| lcnPylGDnU4H9OF wrote:
| I'm not sure the conclusion in the headline is necessarily what
| happened here.
|
| > Researchers deleted the approved ads before they were
| published.
|
| > TikTok and YouTube rejected all the ads and suspended the
| accounts that attempted to submit them, the researchers said.
|
| > [Meta] also said that ads continue to be reviewed after they go
| live.
|
| Makes me wonder what "go live" means in this context. If the
| researchers never "published" the ad (ie, asked Meta to start
| showing it), then how do we really know that Facebook "failed to
| stop" these ads?
|
| I've never advertised on any of these platforms so this may be
| moot, but one might also consider different processes between the
| platforms for when an ad is ready to be shown to consumers. Maybe
| the researchers didn't complete the necessary steps ("publish")
| to be told that their ad is in violation of certain terms.
|
| That being said, it's worth noting that the ads were submitted
| without being published and the submissions were never flagged
| for human review. It's just hard to say "Facebook failed to stop
| ads" when they weren't _necessarily_ given the opportunity to
| "stop" them.
|
| (If someone has more insight, feel free to correct me.)
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2022-12-05 23:02 UTC)