[HN Gopher] Instagram Is Over
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Instagram Is Over
        
       Author : dailo10
       Score  : 151 points
       Date   : 2022-12-03 15:45 UTC (7 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.theatlantic.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.theatlantic.com)
        
       | dmje wrote:
       | Eldest son (17) and all his mates use it - very rarely do they
       | post publicly, it's purely for messaging. I've never been sure
       | why, there's plenty enough alternatives, but that's how it is for
       | him and his cohort.
        
         | dugmartin wrote:
         | I'm pretty sure your son and his mates all have finstas and
         | post a lot - you are just not seeing it (source: having two
         | teenage daughters)
        
           | Vespasian wrote:
           | Not OP, but going by pesonal experience way back in days of
           | original facebook days a lot of people never posted that much
           | and mainly consumed as soon as it was possible.
           | 
           | Even before that on forums etc. there were many more lurkers
           | than posters.
           | 
           | 17 year old me didn't wanted to be compared to all the others
           | "perfect" lives.
           | 
           | Maybe I'm naive but I bet that hasn't fundamentally changed.
        
         | dmix wrote:
         | It's used heavily in dating these days. We use instagram as a
         | messenger because that's what everyone has and it's socially
         | easier to ask a new person for the instagram rather than their
         | phone number.
         | 
         | Its predictable and not entirely private like a close friend
         | group chat on iMessage or WhatsApp. Plus of course the way it
         | integrates with feeds of photo/videos you're already looking at
         | casually.
         | 
         | The same way FB used to be.
        
           | isametry wrote:
           | If data plans weren't tied to them, Gen Z probably wouldn't
           | have phone numbers at all anymore. (Well, at least in those
           | parts of the world where a data reception no slower than 3G
           | is ubiquitous.)
           | 
           | If you think about it, the whole concept really _does_ stick
           | out nowadays. The idea of this unique, static (or at least
           | not easily changeable), non-descript identifier tied only to
           | you and your physical device is very much a product of its
           | time.
           | 
           | Phone numbers only continue to exist by momentum - if a
           | similar thing were to be implemented today, it would never
           | catch on so universally.
        
       | onetimeusename wrote:
       | I am surprised people expect these apps to remain popular for a
       | long time. The internet has changed so much. I've watched social
       | media apps come and go every few years and I personally think
       | they are all short lived trends with maybe a few exceptions. They
       | capture a young market first, who provide the value (photos,
       | videos, memes) and then older generations start joining after the
       | young market is captured. Then after five to 10 years, they age
       | out, the fad is over. A new app captures the younger generation
       | and the cycle repeats.
       | 
       | Some smaller social media networks have maybe kinda sorta
       | survived more than one generation to some extent but it's
       | debatable. Twitter seems like it has the most staying power so
       | far but the present situation is evolving rapidly.
        
         | fasthands9 wrote:
         | I mean I think the people who predicted they would remain
         | popular for a long time were actually right? They may stop
         | accelerating but they are still as popular as ever.
         | 
         | YouTube is the second visited site in the US and FB is the
         | third - and they've been at the top for over a decade. E-mail
         | is not a social network but has stuck around for 20 years. I've
         | used Reddit since 2010. I've been on Instagram for six years
         | now and probably use it more now than I ever have. Even
         | Snapchat which to me seemed like a fad - is massively popular
         | among teens.
         | 
         | I think it is true there are lots of smaller sites like Vine or
         | Digg or YikYak which peter out but it seems like if you hit the
         | critical mass then you can maintain popularity for decades.
        
           | bostik wrote:
           | YouTube likely has staying power _despite_ of what the
           | company are doing with the UI and user experience flows,
           | because it sure as hell can 't be _because_ of it. And at
           | least their search is not trying to actively work against the
           | user. (Their recommendation engine is a dumpster fire, for
           | sure.)
           | 
           | A mostly usable, generally accessible, and fairly easily
           | discoverable video hosting platform. I can think of a lot of
           | worse product pitches.
        
         | fullstackchris wrote:
         | I also have seen and beleive this is an accurate picture of how
         | these things go. But I'd ask, what about pseudo- social network
         | apps like airbnb? They have a minimal social aspect, but to me
         | app like that will have a longer possible lifetime. I guess
         | even in airbnb's case there are competitors encroaching and
         | stealing market share...
        
         | arnvald wrote:
         | I'd actually keep using social apps more if they stayed closer
         | to their original versions.
         | 
         | My Facebook feed turned from updates from my friends and family
         | to garbage filled with politics, ads, suggested pages, and I
         | stopped using it.
         | 
         | My Instagram feed turned from photos of my family and friends
         | to garbage: again ads, recommended pages, later videos.
         | Eventually I deleted it.
         | 
         | Twitter was close to that when they introduces algorithmic feed
         | which showed stuff I didn't want to see and I was close to
         | deleting the app, thankfully there's a way to still have the
         | chronological feed without all the "likes" and
         | "recommendations".
         | 
         | I keep using Reddit because I still can use it the same way as
         | years ago - join communities that interest me and not see the
         | stuff I don't want (even though they regularly push some more
         | useless stuff to show me)
         | 
         | I believe social media can last long, but they need to find
         | balance between monetization, innovation, and staying true to
         | their users. Facebook and Instagram went way too far in
         | alienating their users, and while they're still popular,
         | they're declining.
        
           | onetimeusename wrote:
           | What you're saying is interesting. I think part of that is
           | the tension between older and younger generations which is
           | why I don't think these things last.
           | 
           | Reddit is kind of a notable standout. Maybe that and
           | Twitter's features are what guarantees a sustained
           | viewership. I don't know, this is all kind of new.
           | 
           | At least for photo and video sharing sites, it seems like
           | these tend to be trendy and have a population boom and bust
           | cycle. But then again I don't want to speak authoritatively.
           | But looking at FB it reported it's first decline in daily
           | visits this year and the decline among teens and younger
           | generations is even more pronounced. Certainly looks like a
           | population peak.
        
           | grishka wrote:
           | The desire to "grow", and the lack of a defined end state for
           | that growth, is the problem. It's not hard to build a social
           | media service that pays for itself and then some, but they
           | all are run by greedy people and so they want more money all
           | the time. These people have no notion of "enough money".
           | That's the fundamental problem behind all social media
           | services going to shit.
           | 
           | The fediverse won't be like that though.
        
             | pixl97 wrote:
             | Time will tell what happens with the fediverse, collapsing
             | under the weight of moderation sounds like a probable
             | scenario to me.
        
       | mkl95 wrote:
       | Instagram is "transitional" technology. It peaked at a time when
       | traditional social networks had started their slow decline, and
       | things like Snapchat and TikTok were gaining some popularity.
       | These days it's a bit too open for traditional users, and a bit
       | too boring for the average TikTok user. It will always fill a
       | niche, but it will inevitably shrink by at least an order of
       | magnitude.
        
       | viburnum wrote:
       | "In other words, Instagram is giving us the ick: that feeling
       | when a romantic partner or crush does something small but
       | noticeable--like wearing a fedora--that immediately turns you off
       | forever"
       | 
       | This was so ridiculously judgmental that I couldn't keep reading.
        
         | isametry wrote:
         | There are currently two comments in this thread reacting
         | defensively to that fedora mention - which is two more than I
         | would've preferred there to be.
        
         | 0_____0 wrote:
         | If it makes you feel any better, it's not the hat's fault.
        
         | micromacrofoot wrote:
         | found the fedora-wearer
        
       | TheAceOfHearts wrote:
       | On the topic of social media in decline, TikTok also appears to
       | have peaked in content already.
       | 
       | Following people isn't that interesting since most content
       | creators that hit it big are One Hit Wonders. After they hit that
       | big growth spike, they either follow the herd with the latest
       | dance or trend, or they keep doing the same thing that made em
       | famous with slight variations.
       | 
       | How long can you milk the same dance routine by switching out
       | which celebrity does the silly little dance?
       | 
       | There were a few interesting educational channels for a while,
       | but most people just don't have that many interesting things to
       | keep posting about at the rate which is expected of a platform
       | like TikTok. Quality content takes time to produce.
       | 
       | TikTok really only has a few buckets of content types. Some
       | examples include thirst traps from sex workers that are looking
       | to promote their OnlyFans and cute animals doing cute things.
       | 
       | Instagram isn't that different. I mostly use the app to see cute
       | pictures of people's pets and the occasional human picture.
        
         | throwaway82388 wrote:
         | It is remarkable how hard it is for a business to simply last a
         | decade. To do it at the scale of the incumbent apps is
         | astounding to me.
         | 
         | While TikTok is growing quickly, we still don't know its long
         | term potential, how 'sticky' it is. I'd predict it has a
         | trajectory more like Twitter and less like Snapchat. But it
         | could well become a YouTube. All we can do is wait and find
         | out.
        
           | nickthegreek wrote:
           | TikTok has a creator fund that incentives and rewards their
           | creators. It is much closer to YouTube than Twitter or
           | Snapchat. And I'm pretty sure it's DAUs are way greater than
           | both of those as well.
        
             | throwaway82388 wrote:
             | I regretted the Twitter comparison as soon as I reread my
             | comment. I was thinking in broader terms -- apps where the
             | bulk of users follow creators and not personal contacts
             | tend to grow and sustain very differently. But it's so
             | obviously most similar to YouTube, from a user perspective,
             | it's an accelerated YouTube experience.
        
           | chadlavi wrote:
           | It's almost like these businesses don't actually provide any
           | value (the users do, but the users aren't motivated to
           | provide value, just motivated to drive engagement)
        
         | spaceman_2020 wrote:
         | You have to commend YouTube and Twitter's longevity as social
         | networks.
         | 
         | YouTube has better and more content than ever. Twitter also has
         | the best and most relevant content, provided you curate your
         | feed. All the stuff happening on academic Twitter, for
         | instance, is hard to find elsewhere.
         | 
         | Reddit also seems to be going down the path of irrelevancy. The
         | content is increasingly mediocre and hivemind-ish.
        
           | imbnwa wrote:
           | > Reddit also seems to be going down the path of irrelevancy.
           | The content is increasingly mediocre and hivemind-ish.
           | 
           | If you're just looking at the 'popular front page', sure, but
           | there's a reason people now search Reddit from Google:
           | there's value in a 'centralized hub' for communities versus
           | Twitter's loosely coupled social graphs.
           | 
           | Reddit replaced all vBulletin-backed forums. You could argue
           | Discord might usurp Reddit but Discord isn't searchable from
           | the web and is logged in a terribly inconducive format.
           | 
           | I follow MMA, and the MMA reddit is the biggest forum for MMA
           | on the English-speaking internet, especially for live events,
           | there's no substitute, and I'm sure its like that with a lot
           | of niches.
        
           | dageshi wrote:
           | Reddit always had a hive mind, it's just the hive mind no
           | longer agrees with you so you think it's irrelevant?
           | 
           | Nope, frankly given how long reddit's been around and how it
           | continues to gain in popularity I expect it will outlive
           | everything on that list except for youtube. It's the webs
           | default forum and there will always be a demand for a forum
           | on the web.
        
             | pixl97 wrote:
             | It's not that reddits users agree or disagree with me it's
             | that [removed by Reddit]
        
             | [deleted]
        
           | coffeebeqn wrote:
           | YouTube has matured and now has professional YouTube-first
           | content. The first time I was on YouTube it had every
           | imaginable show (illegally) and that's how they hit their
           | incredible initial growth. Then it was amateurs for the next
           | ten years doing silly stuff and now it's quite a enjoyable
           | platform for information and niche entertainment
        
           | matheusmoreira wrote:
           | > Reddit also seems to be going down the path of irrelevancy.
           | 
           | Reddit's irrelevance is only a matter of time. They're
           | jacking up the advertising and banning anything that offends
           | the advertisers.
           | 
           | Consider also how imageboards managed to remain relevant to
           | this day.
        
         | prpl wrote:
         | This just reminds me of music in the 50s/60s and radio (without
         | the payola)
         | 
         | Some bands were one hit wonders, but some were able to
         | transition to a career, usually help behind them - writers,
         | producers, and everything else from the record label. Chubby
         | Checker always makes me laugh with the song Let's Twist Again.
         | 
         | Something similar happened with Youtube, I think. Especially
         | with media for kids. Popular channels turned into a
         | productions, but usually it was much slower.
         | 
         | TikTok will be like Youtube/Radio Hybrid. Some people will take
         | their one hit wonder and transition to a career, but not
         | without the help of something like a record label or production
         | company.
         | 
         | And if there's payola, it's going to click farms.
        
       | citizenpaul wrote:
       | Instagram is doing just fine at the job it morphed into. A high
       | end escort advertising board.
       | 
       | A 20yo guy cannot afford to spend $5K a day for a beautiful girl
       | that has posted scantly clad pics exactly for this purpose. They
       | are not the market. The market is middle age wealthy men and the
       | women they pay for their "time." Then the women they pay go back
       | to Instagram to find things to buy for "bragging rights" which
       | satisfies the advertisers.
        
       | impulser_ wrote:
       | They moved on from Facebook being over to Instagram being over
       | lol.
       | 
       | Instagram isn't over. It's still the most popular social media
       | app on both App Store and Google Play in the US.
       | 
       | For the past couple of years you always see articles popping up
       | about Facebook being dead, then you look at the actual data and
       | people are using Facebook more than ever.
       | 
       | Look at the last report from Meta, more people on a daily and
       | monthly basis are using Facebook and Instagram than ever both.
       | 
       | Nearly 3b people use their apps on the daily basis. It going to
       | take on hell of a long time before they become over.
        
         | onlyrealcuzzo wrote:
         | > Look at the last report from Meta, more people on a daily and
         | monthly basis are using Facebook and Instagram than ever both.
         | 
         | It's more nuanced than that.
         | 
         | If you're losing traction where it matters - in younger
         | generations & high-value markets like the US that have higher
         | future cash flows - it doesn't matter if you're making up for
         | it with usage from old people or people in poor countries
         | without good advertising infra.
         | 
         | Facebook is definitely not looking rosy for the future.
         | 
         | And Instagram seems like it's on a similar path to Facebook 4
         | or 5 years ago. It doesn't look bad, but it also doesn't look
         | great...
        
           | throwayyy479087 wrote:
           | I went on Instagram for the first time in a few years
           | yesterday. None of my friends post anymore and it's all ads
           | or sponcon.
           | 
           | Group chats have been slowly growing for the last decade, and
           | now have become completely dominant. I wonder how much of it
           | is fear of cancellation leading to defaulting to private
           | communication.
        
             | toastal wrote:
             | I had my account banned this year after logging in for a
             | long while and told I looked too much like a bot. The only
             | way to try to get access again was to upload a 'video
             | selfie' at multiple angles, but no way would I want to help
             | that facial algorithm any more than necessary. Good
             | riddance.
        
           | com2kid wrote:
           | > in younger generations & high-value markets like the US
           | that have higher future cash flows
           | 
           | People in their 30s and 40s earn more money than college
           | students and new grads in their 20s, and they are spending
           | that money right now. Facebook groups for home decorating,
           | design, cars, fitness, parenting, all of those are really
           | popular. You can go on Facebook and find a large community
           | dedicated to literally any style of home decor you can
           | imagine, and those people are quite willing to spend money.
           | 
           | Same with the parenting groups. DINKs don't spend money at
           | anything near the rate parents do. DINKs have higher free
           | cash flow, but that is because they have free cash, parents
           | are buying stuff all the time.
           | 
           | Honestly, 5 years ago I barely used Facebook, now that I am
           | older I am using it a lot more.
           | 
           | Also, with that entire population decline thing, each new
           | generation is, at best, the same size as the generation that
           | came before it. If constant double digit growth is desired,
           | sure, need to get that next generation on board, but at some
           | point Facebook may have to be happy with "just" earning hard
           | to imagine amounts of money each year and only seeing single
           | digit growth in revenue.
        
             | pixl97 wrote:
             | >but at some point Facebook may have to be happy with
             | "just"
             | 
             | This isn't a Facebook problem, this is a late stage
             | capitalism problem that risks causing our current economies
             | to collapse to the ground.
        
         | taf2 wrote:
         | Gonna say between my three daughters and their huge network of
         | friends and family I can't see "insta" fading away anytime
         | soon... maybe as an investor we could say expected growth is
         | going to slow due to market saturation or something but "insta"
         | is here to stay from what I can see
        
         | deltree7 wrote:
         | I like how HN crowd falls all over for an article that caters
         | to what they want to believe.
         | 
         | Where is Anecdotal vs Actual Usage Data rage?
         | 
         | Ah, that's right, it doesn't fit their narrative. So, everyone
         | is happy to Fox-News this.
        
       | bsnnkv wrote:
       | My anecdata is that all IG is really used for anymore is
       | messaging due to inertia and cross-posting content from other
       | platforms. Very little original user generated content.
       | 
       | Fundamentally, these old apps that are built on the "create an
       | account and manually follow users" model cannot compete with
       | TikTok right now, and I don't think they'll be able to change to
       | be competitive with TikTok in the future.
        
       | purec wrote:
       | Author points to data showing 300m active users in 2013, 2b
       | active users now, yet claims that Instagram is over. What is the
       | replacement? Where is the decline?
        
         | achenet wrote:
         | Author is in what some would call an NYC cool kid media bubble,
         | and you know, those cool kids aren't using it anymore, which
         | means no on who matters does (2billion active dorks
         | notwithstanding)
        
       | throwaway82388 wrote:
       | I'm far from bullish on meta long-term, but reporting like this
       | would have you believe that nobody uses Facebook, and that
       | Instagram is soon to share its fate. Optimists that they are,
       | tech reporters overweight growth to absurd extremes. Maybe
       | reporting on youth trends brings out the insecurities in all of
       | us--you'd rather not look clueless in front of your two cool
       | friends in their early 20s than the 2 billion or so Facebook
       | MAUs.
       | 
       | TikTok is a platform with huge growth potential. IG is
       | perceptibly declining. But Facebook has proven itself fairly
       | durable, mostly to people outside tech and media bubbles. It'd be
       | wise to not call it over just yet.
        
         | AJ007 wrote:
         | Does it? Back in 2021 TikTok was averaging more hours of
         | viewing per month than Youtube (in the US.)
        
         | joshenberg wrote:
         | Durable isn't a great word for what Facebook has become. It's
         | been LinkedIn-ified - the entire notifications category is
         | filled with useless recommendations and suggestions rather than
         | meaningful updates from connections. And they still put
         | notification dots up for it. Even if there's an opt out option
         | and I could 'filter that' I haven't seen anything else relevant
         | in 1+ year.
        
           | throwaway82388 wrote:
           | That sounds like a bad experience, but it's not universal.
           | It's challenging to understand a platform from our individual
           | vantage points (without access to internal dashboards),
           | particularly on a network with between 2-3 billion MAUs. And
           | if your personal interests are elsewhere, and your
           | generational cohort is underrepresented. I'm an 'elder
           | millennial' who got Facebook when it was still only for edu
           | domains, and I've grown older with the service. I just
           | briefly checked in with mine and within the last 24 hours I
           | can see at least a dozen updates (all with decent engagement)
           | from family and friends, some distant and others close.
           | Babies being born, kids doing kid stuff, holiday posts.
           | Pretty typical, particularly at this time of year. All that
           | is to say, it's all a function of your real world network. If
           | I were the age I was when I started using Facebook, I'd
           | probably find it desolate and boring, too.
           | 
           | But I would say 'fairly durable' is an apt description of an
           | 18 year old service still operating at its scale. Exciting,
           | maybe less than it once was. But fairly durable, certainly.
        
         | pfortuny wrote:
         | All of us tend to forget that each year there is a whole cohort
         | of people getting a new phone and using fb, instagram, twitter,
         | whatever for the first time.
        
         | nightski wrote:
         | It takes a second to open an app, become a MAU, and then close
         | it in disinterest. I'll admit this is my relationship with
         | Facebook. I never see anything on there I am remotely
         | interested in. Just old relatives spewing nonsense. But I guess
         | I count as one of those 2 billion MAUs. I wonder how many are
         | in the same spot.
        
           | akeck wrote:
           | Myself and other folks in my friend group are MAU in that we
           | use FB about once a month, maybe once every two months. My IG
           | use became the same after the recent feed changes. Using
           | either platform now feels like work and I have enough work to
           | do already.
        
           | seydor wrote:
           | You keep opening it though
        
           | throwaway82388 wrote:
           | I'd bet a solid majority, like it is on any social platform.
           | Most users don't post or engage.
           | 
           | Biggest predictor for Facebook and IG use among my sample of
           | friends is whether they're married and have families, or in
           | many cases, pets. In my sample, many own homes or property.
           | Not where the growth is, but not worthless from a revenue
           | standpoint.
        
       | seydor wrote:
       | "cool people are bored of some media consumption format"
       | 
       | What will be the next one?
       | 
       | A: hand drawn postcards
        
       | barnabee wrote:
       | Instagram as a social network sucks but I like sharing my photos
       | with people who are already my friends (private account), and
       | seeing their photos too.
        
         | rpxio wrote:
         | my close friends and family have moved to the app Locket for
         | sharing photos. much more direct and less "social" features
         | (likes, follows, reels) that i don't care about.
        
         | rndgermandude wrote:
         | In my German circles, that spot has been covered by whatsapp
         | for a long while now. It never has been instagram or anything
         | else really. For me it went from studivz (long defunct German
         | "facebook" for university students, didn't last long), via
         | facebook (for a short while, and due to lack of alternatives)
         | straight to whatsapp, and has stayed there ever since, with the
         | exception of some photography interested people sharing larger
         | sets of photos on flickr at times, and some dating/sexting
         | happening on snap (but most of that still was/is on whatsapp).
         | Instagram was always understood as a place where you go if you
         | want to see celebs, influencers and the "wannabes".
         | 
         | Granted, I am a bit older, a millennial (as much as it hurts me
         | to admit) and an older one at that, but I regularly take the
         | tram in my city at times when all the teenagers are going to
         | school or coming from school, and you can see a damn lot of
         | whatsapp on all those phone screens, a lot of tiktok, and a
         | good amount of discord.
        
       | indymike wrote:
       | Instagram was really nice until a few years ago. I could keep up
       | visually with family and friends, and didn't have all
       | advertorial, news and political garbage get in the way. Still
       | good for talking to people, but a lot of that is moving to
       | messenger apps not from Meta.
        
       | yupis wrote:
       | Instagram is the new Tumblr
        
       | lmedinas wrote:
       | There are 3 reasons why Tiktok succeeded and Instagram struggles.
       | 
       | 1) The focus of the Social Network is normal people, doing
       | anything it might be interesting to others. Which is pretty much
       | the contrary of Instagram which focus on Celebrities and
       | "Friends".
       | 
       | 2) Tiktok has an amazing fine-tuned Algorithm. Its like even a
       | mirror of your subconscious, it tries very much to play anything
       | you desire to see.
       | 
       | 3) Instagram, Youtube and Twitter are full of ads. It just breaks
       | the user experience. Youtube experience sucks too because they
       | show Videos with higher probability of views which in turn are
       | tipically big youtubers playing sponsored content.
        
       | coolbreezetft22 wrote:
       | Maybe I'm ignorant of what TikTok is but it seems to be mostly
       | about video sharing and less about "social networking" with
       | friends and family??
       | 
       | I also think TikTok has serious risks going forward re Chinese
       | government. Already a lot of grumbling from lawmakers in US about
       | banning it as CCP growing more belligerent in recent years
       | whereas Facebook products aren't at all influenced by it.
        
         | chrischen wrote:
         | Tiktok is short addictive videos from randos.
         | 
         | Youtube is long addictive videos.
         | 
         | Instagram and facebook is still primarily focused on content
         | from people you know, though they are also trying to copy some
         | of TikTok's randos content via the Reels feature.
         | 
         | At the end of the day they just want to get attention by giving
         | content, whether using friends or essentially crowdsourcing.
         | 
         | I prefer Netflix, because I'm paying them and they are not just
         | manipulating me to show ads.
        
           | api wrote:
           | The trend in social media for years has been away from social
           | and toward just addictive content and finding the best way to
           | crowdsource that content. The purpose is becoming simply to
           | get you to spend as much time as possible staring at the
           | phone to sell ads, and nothing more.
           | 
           | I predict the next advancement will be pure AI generated
           | content, just a continuous adversarial attack on the human
           | brain programmed to maximize viewing time for each
           | individual. This could be packaged as things like virtual
           | friends (Replika) or games with constantly evolving game play
           | punctuated with ads or even as something that looks like
           | TikTok.
           | 
           | Pure refined 200 proof addictive emptiness is the logical
           | apex of "free" mass media. We will look back on TV and early
           | generation social media as high culture compared to what's
           | coming.
        
             | jmcgough wrote:
             | I think we're seeing a pendulum swing in some ways. The
             | migration to Mastodon has been really exciting because
             | servers are funded through Patreon, not eyeballs.
             | Communities are smaller and content is higher quality,
             | without pressuring you to post content you think will get
             | the most likes. It's like an actual social media platform,
             | not what so many others have become.
        
           | DoingIsLearning wrote:
           | > I prefer Netflix, because I'm paying them and they are not
           | just manipulating me to show ads
           | 
           | Sorry to break it to you but Netflix is absolutely
           | manipulating their audience in trying to convince everyone to
           | watch Netflix productions.
           | 
           | When Netflix came into the market they had a unique platform
           | and were burning money to get good content in. Now studios
           | realized there is money in streaming and are squeezing
           | Netflix prices.
           | 
           | Making their own productions means it is all vertical for
           | them, less risk and more profitable.
           | 
           | By the end of it you're stuck watching something, just not
           | exactly what you wanted in the first place.
        
           | slowmovintarget wrote:
           | This reminds me of a related article discussed earlier:
           | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32482523
           | 
           | The Three Trends:
           | 
           | 1. Medium: text -> images -> video -> 3D graphics -> VR
           | 
           | 2. AI: time -> rank -> recommend -> generate
           | 
           | 3. UI: click -> scroll -> tap -> swipe -> autoplay
           | 
           | TikTok is at the video/recommend/swipe stage.
        
             | fxtentacle wrote:
             | Autoplaying VR porn generated on-demand to perfectly match
             | each visitor's preferences.
             | 
             | Yeah, that sounds like it would become popular very
             | quickly.
        
         | jsemrau wrote:
         | In my eyes, TikTok is a social entertainment app where simple
         | user-generated content is created with the purpose to provide
         | enjoyment. It's not focused on the needs of other users, but
         | entirely about one's own needs. Hence, I call this new version
         | of social Eigensocial.
        
           | kodisha wrote:
           | I think it's safe to assume that it's purpose is to gather
           | data.
        
       | noveltyaccount wrote:
       | _" To scroll through Instagram today is to parse a series of
       | sponsored posts from brands, recommended Reels from people you
       | don't follow, and the occasional picture from a friend that's
       | finally surfaced."_
       | 
       | I have two Instagram accounts: one that _only_ follows friends
       | and family. Another that follows brands, influencers, and such.
       | It completely fixed my Instagram experience. I can choose the
       | (low volume) social network of friends, or endless scrolling and
       | discovery. Never do they intermix. The friends-only feed is so
       | low traffic, I never get sucked into sponsored or suggested
       | posts. Highly recommend.
        
       | prpl wrote:
       | Instagram was over when all the "kids" were on Snapchat, except
       | it wasn't.
       | 
       | Maybe it is, but it will be a death by 500 million cuts, not a
       | max exodus. There is no clear successor.
        
         | coldtea wrote:
         | > _There is no clear successor._
         | 
         | Successor to what? As if it serves some purpose? This is like
         | wondering what will "successfully replace" a tumor that's to be
         | removed...
         | 
         | (And, yes, you can have millions of users without service a
         | purpose, at least not any useful one. All kinds of crap has).
        
       | warkanlock wrote:
       | This is one of the biggest jibes I have ever read, given that
       | Meta's MAU is the highest of all time (2.9b, if I remember
       | correctly)
       | 
       | Instagram it's not over, and I bet will win the battle against
       | TikTok
        
         | pixl97 wrote:
         | MAU doesn't mean much if they are losing users in primary
         | markets and new users are from places where the ads don't pay.
        
         | jibe wrote:
         | Jibe?
        
           | chihuahua wrote:
           | Jibe
           | 
           | (verb): change course by swinging a fore-and-aft sail across
           | a following wind.
           | 
           | (noun): an act or instance of jibing.
           | 
           | GP believes that the Atlantic article constitutes an instance
           | of changing course by swinging a sail across a following
           | wind, presumably metaphorically.
        
             | bink wrote:
             | Check their username.
        
       | jrm4 wrote:
       | In a very broad sense, I'm glad to see things like this
       | happening; I think a (relatively) high rate of turnover in social
       | media is probably orders of magnitude better and safer than "one
       | app to rule them all, forever."
       | 
       | It additionally makes me bullish on federated deals like
       | Activitypub/Mastodon.
       | 
       | It's funny that the above presently tend to be "lefty-crunchy-
       | hippie" -- because, I think if _corporations_ get it through
       | their hiveminds that the above enables them to have their own
       | "official source of truth," thus preventing doofiness like blue
       | check marks, this would all take off in a beneficial way.
        
         | winternett wrote:
         | They keep starting out with a free service then they focus on
         | turning it into a paid service... In Instagram's case, just
         | like with Twitter and even TikTok now, they charge users for
         | visibility, or they trickle it out just enough to make users
         | constantly and feverishly ask what they're doing wrong. It's
         | mental manipulation that just doesn't work, and the paid
         | advertising format leads platforms to their death, but just
         | like users keep posting, investors are flocking to put money
         | onto the next social media platform.
         | 
         | I hope that independent web communities return, and that people
         | start making their own web sites, tracking music and
         | entertainment across multiple platforms and dealing with their
         | content payola schemes and repetitive marketing is ruining
         | everything fun and useful about the Internet.
        
       | risingsubmarine wrote:
       | On more than a few occasions now I have loaded up my infrequently
       | checked instagram accounts and been presented with something
       | awful. They were always attention seeking reels from random
       | accounts I don't follow; showing people being hurt or accident
       | footage. I swipe up on the app and kill it pretty much straight
       | away, then I consider deleting my instagram accounts once again.
        
       | racked wrote:
       | Honestly I never understood the appeal.
       | 
       | A social network that forces you to wedge your content in images
       | and short videos, while on Facebook you could share YouTube
       | videos, music, interesting links, write-ups, you name it. How can
       | anyone in their right mind prefer something as limiting as
       | Instagram? Even its instant messenger is limited compared to
       | Facebook's.
        
         | standardUser wrote:
         | The simplification is (was) part of the appeal. It felt clean
         | and refreshing to mostly look at pretty photos with minimal
         | text. And it was a much more positive space. Photos of
         | vacations, food, clothes, pets, friends. No political fighting
         | or conspiracy theories or bitching about an ex. The comment
         | space, a usual cesspool of unmitigated negativity and cruelty,
         | was conveniently tucked away.
         | 
         | I miss the pre-pandemic Instagram. Now, it feels like it's
         | transformed into a more general-purpose, Facebook-like social
         | network. Which I guess should have been predictable!
        
         | pwython wrote:
         | People said the same thing about Twitter with its original 140
         | character limit. Just easily-consumable content you can scroll
         | through. I enjoy the artwork I find on there. If I want YouTube
         | links, music videos, news articles, etc I'll hit up Reddit.
        
         | mertd wrote:
         | Instagram's formats feel nicer for getting updates from friends
         | and family. No rants, just happy photos against usually a nice
         | background.
         | 
         | Performative or commercial accounts make the experience worse
         | though, and from what I understand these are being prioritized
         | in the timeline.
        
       | raldi wrote:
       | Instagram used to be about seeing what my friends were up to; now
       | it's all my friends resharing made-for-IG takes and re-re-re-re-
       | re-sharing group photos I've already seen seven times.
       | 
       | I want an "OC Only" toggle.
       | 
       | Edit: And the above was referring only to Stories. I haven't
       | looked at the feed regularly in over a year.
        
       | jumpkick wrote:
       | I wonder if there's a market for small app, limited in scope,
       | knock off of the original Instagram. $1/month.
        
         | rglullis wrote:
         | https://pixelfed.org.
         | 
         | Tell me you are willing to pay $1/month, and I will stop
         | postponing it and finally add it to https://communick.com
        
         | MattDemers wrote:
         | You end up having a cyclical problem, though:
         | 
         | No one uses it because no one posts > No one posts because they
         | don't expect interaction > No one expects interaction because
         | no one uses it
         | 
         | And then brands or influencers don't join because there's no
         | potential to make money.
         | 
         | Part of the history of these big incumbents is that people were
         | discovering a more user-friendly way to use the web _through_
         | them; Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, YouTube all were  "Hey, we
         | can now do something we could do before, much easier, in a more
         | accessible way that I can show to my normie friends/my
         | parents."
         | 
         | Alternatives that DO come up, like 500px or Vimeo, end up
         | needing to become more for enthusiasts (people who care about
         | fidelity, rather than novelty), turning away normies in the
         | process. That's fine for them, as long as their goal isn't to
         | "be an alternative YouTube/Flickr."
        
         | pipeline_peak wrote:
         | I'm sure there's many but in the world of social media, content
         | is key and users are what make that happen.
         | 
         | I tried using Peer Tube recently, felt like I was on 2005
         | YouTube...absolute no man's land
        
         | BbzzbB wrote:
         | There are reasons why IG has 2B people, part of which is not
         | charging $1/month.
        
           | rglullis wrote:
           | There are many email providers who are quite profitable by
           | charging just that and are not afraid of Gmail's absolute
           | dominance.
        
             | isametry wrote:
             | Well, and do those providers have 1.5 billion users like
             | Gmail does?
             | 
             | I'm not really sure whether you made this analogy to
             | disagree or to prove their point.
        
             | thekyle wrote:
             | If you use one of those smaller paid email providers you
             | can still interact with people who use Gmail. If you tried
             | to create a small Instagram competitor it's unlikely that
             | Facebook would ever agree to federate with you.
        
               | rglullis wrote:
               | No, but you can federate with the millions of people
               | already using other alternatives based on ActivityPub.
               | 
               | People are really underestimating the second order
               | effects from the Twitter exodus. It's not just Twitter
               | that has a competitor. It's just a matter of time until
               | _all_ the Fediverse gets enough of a critical mass and
               | then _all_ walled gardens will lose its appeal.
        
       | nowherebeen wrote:
       | Social products all have a lifetime value and it's incredibly
       | short. The same thing will also happen to TikTok one day. I
       | suspect we will learn in the coming decades that social media
       | companies are very profitable in the short term, but not so in
       | the long term, say 20 years, unless the keep introducing new
       | viral social products.
        
         | yogthos wrote:
         | This is a problem for commercial social media companies.
         | Companies need to make profit to operate, and once they stop
         | being able to show growth then investments start to dry up.
         | There is also no clear revenue model aside from ads and mining
         | of user data.
         | 
         | The situation is quite different in open source world. The only
         | factors that matter for an open source platform are having
         | enough people who are willing to develop it, run servers, and
         | post content. Once the platform reaches enough users to be
         | sustainable then it can exist indefinitely without need for
         | growth or any significant funding.
         | 
         | We can look at Mastodon as a case study. It builds on top of
         | all the work done by GNU Social and the OStatus protocol. GNU
         | Social languished in obscurity for many years, but Mastodon was
         | able to build on this work and create a much larger social
         | network. Now, there's a whole federation of different platforms
         | using ActivityPub protocol that grew out of OStatus. Fediverse
         | will likely outlive every single commercial social media
         | platform in existence today.
        
         | dopeboy wrote:
         | I think this is a lazy conclusion and needs more depth. What's
         | huge - seismic really - is that people actually prefer to know
         | more about strangers than friends. On average, these strangers
         | tend to be personalities and as a result are more entertaining
         | / interesting / provocative than my typical friend. Combine
         | this with the average person posting less about their life and
         | you end up with a serious problem.
         | 
         | Twitter first rode this trend, but TikTok really exploited it
         | specifically with the medium of video and their algorithm to
         | serve content.
         | 
         | Networks effects were once seen as the ultimate moat and one
         | reason why FB could never be taken down. But it turns out if
         | the content people "trade" on their "marketplace" is poor, all
         | the network effects in the world won't save you.
        
           | bg24 wrote:
           | Why bother building a network when the whole world can be
           | your network.
        
         | babyshake wrote:
         | It would be interesting to see a major player in the space
         | really embracing the fashion and seasonality of their products
         | and succeeding with that strategy.
        
           | specialist wrote:
           | Like the CPG, dating, porn, gaming, and clothing industries?
           | 
           | Some categories of brands can be long lived. Coca Cola and
           | Disney.
           | 
           | Some categories of brands are mayflies. Pop music, TV, fast
           | fashion.
           | 
           | My hunch is the average lifecycle of social media brands and
           | MMORPG properties are roughly the same. Say 5-10 years?
        
             | kodisha wrote:
             | WOW would like to have a word.
        
         | UweSchmidt wrote:
         | I think it's the opposite: lifetimes for well-established
         | social products are getting longer. People left digg for reddit
         | because of a redesign, people stay on Twitter despite an
         | ideologic shift from left to right! Nerds switch platforms over
         | minor perceived slights and switch Linux distributions over
         | license-philosophies or systemd-controversies; normies stay
         | with the herd, with the audience, with the likes and clicks.
        
       | Animats wrote:
       | _" To scroll through Instagram today is to parse a series of
       | sponsored posts from brands, recommended Reels from people you
       | don't follow, and the occasional picture from a friend that's
       | finally surfaced after being posted several days ago. It's not
       | what it used to be."_
       | 
       | That seems to be how social media services die. Too many ads,
       | fewer users, revenue drop, more ads to boost revenue, still fewer
       | users, irrelevance. This is called "pulling a Myspace".
        
         | evo wrote:
         | I feel like there's a natural adoption curve to social media:
         | 
         | 1. The growing social media platform balances the needs of two
         | user groups: the consumer's need for fresh content and the
         | neophyte producer's need for a slowly ramping trickle of
         | validation. This is possible because the people don't know how
         | to produce content in the new format yet.
         | 
         | 2. The mature social media platform has picked winners. We know
         | who the successful youtubers are, the successful twitch
         | streamers, etc., and they know how to create the optimal media
         | for their platform. At this point we're maximally satisfying
         | consumer demand, but we're actively repelling the neophyte
         | producers because the bar is now too high. They form a growing
         | untapped market for the next social media platform.
         | 
         | 3. Decay. A competing platform has stolen the limelight by
         | restoring the dynamism of the consumer/producer balance. The
         | successful producers of the platform start flexing out to the
         | new upstart, though they're unlikely to repeat their successes
         | there, they're too late to the game and bound to old habits.
         | Chasing feature parity with the new platform does nothing
         | because now you're just upsetting the existing balance but
         | that's not suddenly going to pull new people into the game,
         | they've already written you off.
        
           | pmontra wrote:
           | Some social media are like that, others are not. When I read
           | "It's that I don't see my actual friend's posts and they
           | don't see mine." I thought that my friends do see my posts
           | and viceversa because we use channels on WhatsApp and
           | Telegram. If all I want is keeping in touch with friends, why
           | should I use media like Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, TikTok?
        
             | pixl97 wrote:
             | Because in the US almost no one uses WhatsApp and Telegram.
        
         | saiya-jin wrote:
         | This is 100% my experience with facebook. It used to be
         | bearable, but once covid and WFH hit globally, they changed
         | ratio of adverts massively overnight, making the use of product
         | a sufferfest for people like me who are allergic to ads.
         | Unfortunately not even ublock origin can handle all of their
         | embedded ads.
         | 
         | Well, I certainly will never ever miss FB but those contacts
         | would be nice to preserve somehow...
        
         | fnordpiglet wrote:
         | When the accountants make the decisions, the company must die.
        
           | coffeebeqn wrote:
           | Hey don't blame the accountants. The root problem is that
           | these services don't actually have a business plan other than
           | grow, sell ads. Instagram is 12 years old and their
           | leadership hasn't come up with anything that makes money.
        
         | amelius wrote:
         | And even the non-advertisement posts are still self-promotional
         | posts.
        
           | elgar1212 wrote:
           | this is even more infuriating than actual ads, because at
           | least actual ads have the "sponsored" label and don't try to
           | hide it
        
         | 63 wrote:
         | This isn't my experience with Instagram at all. I only follow
         | people I know personally, check in once or twice a day and see
         | posts and stories from them and really nothing else. No
         | sponsored posts, no reels, etc. Maybe some ads. I don't use the
         | discover page and stop scrolling my feed once I get through all
         | the new posts so maybe that's it.
        
           | Mistletoe wrote:
           | All mine has devolved to is trying to get me to watch absurd
           | reels posts from half naked women trying to send me to an
           | OnlyFans. Asking around to people I know they have
           | experienced the same. I just stopped using it. It didn't help
           | that I realized every post on Instagram authentic or not is
           | really just an ad. Even for people I know, it is an ad trying
           | to sell me that their life is different than I know it is.
        
             | saurik wrote:
             | So, while I 100% agree with the original premise--that
             | Instagram is filled with ads and content farms, with
             | relatively few "real users" to be found--this specific
             | complaint is actually "a you thing": Instagram's feed
             | algorithm ranks content in ways that seems to give the
             | wrong players power (such as by giving more weight to
             | people who merely steal and aggregate content than the ones
             | who produce it), but it isn't entirely incompetent.
             | 
             | I am, thereby, going to claim that, if you are getting
             | nothing but half naked women on Instagram on your feed, it
             | is because you actually "wanted" to see half naked women
             | (...maybe "merely" subconsciously! as, while I am not
             | entirely sure about Instagram, TikTok is apparently
             | tracking implicit watch time more so than explicit actions,
             | and maybe you stop for just a bit longer on such content as
             | it catches your eye).
             | 
             | In contrast to your experience, I recently went through a
             | devastating breakup, and my algorithmic Instagram feed
             | seriously has _no_ half naked women on it: it is, instead,
             | nothing but an _intense_ pile of captioned voices (like, an
             | audio with text, but not video of that person) saying
             | pseudo-motivational quotes about relationships ( "if she
             | had wanted to make time, she would have" sort of shit) with
             | inspirational background music overlapped with videos of
             | people "making stuff" (such as carpentry).
             | 
             | It is _demoralizing_ to experience: I go into Instagram for
             | whatever reason, start scrolling by accident, and then a
             | half hour later I am at the bottom of a pit of emotions
             | crying my eyes out while clutching a pillow and I am lucky
             | if I escape even an hour after that :(... but, the
             | algorithm does 't care about my mental health: it only
             | knows that if it shows me videos that cluster along these
             | axes I apparently am willing to spend the rest of my life
             | watching ads (which make up about 1/4th of the content on
             | Instagram).
        
           | iLoveOncall wrote:
           | I am in the same situation as you but as soon as you have
           | caught up with the posts from friends (which if you only have
           | a few hundreds and check everyday goes very quickly), it's
           | literally only sponsored posts.
           | 
           | I just checked right now, I scrolled through 10 posts of
           | accounts that I follow, which took 30 seconds, before getting
           | "You're all caught up" and having literally only spam posts.
           | 
           | And I don't even go on Instagram every day.
        
         | matheusmoreira wrote:
         | It's how _everything_ on the internet dies. Advertising infects
         | and ruins pretty much everything. Even normal websites are just
         | as bad, they even have the exact same escalating ads problem.
         | By now the web is unusable without uBlock Origin and Instagram
         | 's problem is we can't install an ad blocker on it.
         | 
         | There should be a way to speed up this cycle to make them fail
         | faster. These corporations are making way too much money
         | selling off our attention to the highest bidder as if it was
         | their property.
        
           | dbtc wrote:
           | We should stop letting them have it as if it was their
           | property.
        
             | matheusmoreira wrote:
             | Yes. Advertising should be illegal. Failing that, there
             | should be ubiquitous technology to render it completely
             | ineffective by deleting ads in real time, destroying any
             | and all returns on their advertising investment.
             | 
             | One day someone smarter than me will make some machine
             | learning thing that deletes brands from videos in real
             | time.
        
               | Animats wrote:
               | > Advertising should be illegal.
               | 
               | Arguably, it should not be a tax-deductible business
               | expense for businesses. At least not beyond, say, 20% of
               | cost of goods sold.
        
       | crossroadsguy wrote:
       | And there's no use relevant/usable alternative on the horizon.
       | Except a few utopian (or shall I say purist) ones.
       | 
       | I guess one reason could be - even if someone wants to give it a
       | shot they pretty much know that one of these behemoths will copy
       | and drive them out, or buy them out but for that they need to
       | have audience which is locked in vast corporate silos.
        
       | cainxinth wrote:
       | Instagram isn't over, but it is becoming passe, which is not a
       | positive sign for an app built around making people look cool.
        
       | svnpenn wrote:
       | the login wall is what killed it for me. try this link in a
       | private window:
       | 
       | https://instagram.com/p/ClCFeRSjOXo
       | 
       | if you hit refresh 5 times, even slowly, you get blocked until
       | you login. I shouldn't have to login just to view a post.
        
       | ajsnigrutin wrote:
       | When the percentage of ads (sponsored posts/stories) is higher
       | than the content you want to see, it becomes a pain to actually
       | use the app, and you slowly use it less and less until you stop
       | using it alltogether.
        
       | TylerE wrote:
       | Figures.
       | 
       | It recently passed the mom test. My 70-something mom signing up
       | for something is a strong signal it has peaked.
        
       | denton-scratch wrote:
       | > something small but noticeable--like wearing a fedora--that
       | immediately turns you off forever.
       | 
       | There seems to be a thing that some people hate "fedoras". I
       | think it's to do with the "Fedora guy" meme. The hat Jerry
       | Messing appears in is not a fedora; it's a trilby.
       | 
       | A trilby is a hat with a quite narrow brim, and stiffened; it's
       | often woven and patterned. It can be made of just about anything
       | (such as leather). You can't really mess with the brim; it's
       | flipped up at the back and down at the front, and it stays that
       | way.
       | 
       | A fedora is a soft felt hat with a wide brim. The hats worn by
       | both the cops and the robbers in 30's gangster movies are all
       | fedoras. Felt hats are not woven; they're felted, and that means
       | they have to be made of wool or fur (I guess a panama fedora is
       | an exception, but then I think a panama fedora is just a panama
       | hat that is the same shape as a real fedora).
       | 
       | Where I come from, a trilby is associated with racecourse bookies
       | and the criminal fraternity, as well as tacky seaside "kiss-me-
       | quick" hats, made of something like cardboard. Fedoras, on the
       | contrary, are stylish.
       | 
       | They're also very functional. They shed rain like an umbrella,
       | without dumping it down your neck. The only thing wrong with them
       | is that they make a good aerofoil - you have to "hold onto your
       | hats" if it's windy.
        
         | phillipcarter wrote:
         | This comment is imperceptible from a parody of a hacker news
         | comment.
        
           | brian-armstrong wrote:
           | It perfectly captures the original characterization of the
           | meme. I really hope they are in on the joke.
        
           | denton-scratch wrote:
           | Indistinguishable?
        
           | the_only_law wrote:
           | I think it's a copypasta but I can't quite recall.
        
             | nerfhammer wrote:
             | no hits on google; it appears to be original
        
               | onetimeusename wrote:
               | well it's saved in my copypasta file now
        
             | denton-scratch wrote:
             | You are mistaken. If there's someone on the internet that
             | agrees with me, then I'm surprised! I composed it myself,
             | and I didn't refer to other sources.
             | 
             | If I quote someone else here, I put it in quotes.
        
               | oe wrote:
               | "Actually, it's a trilby" is a point that was made
               | already 10 years ago when fedora hate was at its peak.
        
               | the_only_law wrote:
               | Yeah I probably mixed it up with something on the same
               | subject.
        
         | Jun8 wrote:
         | I usually just upvote and move on, not to add a noisy comment
         | to the discussion; however you comment was so informative and
         | well-written that I felt compelled to comment on it.
         | 
         | For those who want to try the fedora, I recommend the "Indiana
         | Jones" look (https://herbertjohnson.co.uk/collections/indiana-
         | jones-colle...). I had one of these but unfortunately the
         | parent's comment about them being aerofoils is true: lost it to
         | a gust in the Grand Canyon. It fell tantalizingly close to the
         | fence, re-creating the "Let it go!" scene :-)
        
       | haunter wrote:
       | The Atlantic is more over than IG
        
         | Apocryphon wrote:
         | And yet, here we are commenting on an Atlantic article and not
         | an Instagram post.
        
         | daveevad wrote:
         | FWIW (not much) - I've never used IG or read The Atlantic.
         | 
         | There is simply far too much stuff on the Internet that's not
         | memberwalled or paywalled.
        
         | Barrin92 wrote:
         | unlike most digital apps The Atlantic has been around for
         | almost 170 years. Based on that fact alone I'd give it a good
         | shot to outlive not one but the next five to ten successors of
         | IG.
        
       | itake wrote:
       | Walking through the mall yesterday, I was shocked to see 5+
       | adults watch FB Reels / IG / TikTok. I think FB might be right
       | about video being the future.
        
       | yamrzou wrote:
       | https://archive.ph/Ujltn
        
       | jrnichols wrote:
       | I think it's more accurate to say The Atlantic is over before
       | Instagram is.
       | 
       | We've been using Instagram more than any of the other social
       | networks. Not making a TikTok account. YouTube lost me forever
       | with their invasive ad push. Facebook lost me with its over the
       | top moderation and irrelevant & useless ads. My Twitter account
       | was suspended for a SNL quote.
       | 
       | Instagram currently has _relevant_ and generally well done ads,
       | if anything. The videos are also captivating and addictive and
       | currently not littered with ads. I think that if they put ads in
       | the Reels, they 'd drive away a lot of traffic. Right now you
       | almost don't notice some of the ads, and the ones you do notice
       | are generally well done. That's a big difference right there, in
       | my opinion.
       | 
       | Instagram has a lot of fun educational content & accounts. TikTok
       | seems to lack that - it's a pool of misinformation more than
       | education in my experience.
       | 
       | Definitely going to disagree with The Atlantic here.
        
         | nickthegreek wrote:
         | Atlantic has been around for over 150 years. The kids are
         | moving away from Instagram, so unless Instagram is going to
         | wait out the next generation and hope the grandchildren are
         | going to make accounts, they are going to run into issues.
        
       | syllablehq wrote:
       | I think the key to a massively successful new social network will
       | be a fallback API of just email/text.
       | 
       | Why not let your shiny new social network UI parse any dumb input
       | into a fancy thread format? Zero adoption friction. Federation
       | baked in.
       | 
       | Example: You run a mastodon-like service that can receive email.
       | When it gets an email, it publishes a twirt with the contents.
       | Truncates as needed.
       | 
       | If it's a new email address, spin up new user with email
       | username. No password needed, cause it came from the email
       | address you own.
       | 
       | Conversely, in the fancy interface, you can @soandso@gmail.com
       | and it will email them for you. Doesn't matter if they've "joined
       | twartordon." So it has a dumb-simple user growth model baked in.
       | 
       | I've been promoting this idea for years in the man-yells-at-
       | clouds format, but folks don't seem to get why it's so
       | powerful...
        
         | cardamomo wrote:
         | SMS is how I used to use Twitter, back in 2008 or so. You could
         | text 40404 with your tweet, and you could receive Tweets from
         | that number too. It was great in that era before I had a
         | smartphone, and it felt like something halfway between a group
         | chat and microblogging. I miss that mode of interaction.
        
         | pixl97 wrote:
         | Have you ever ran a mail server?
         | 
         | When you're blocking 99.93% of incoming messages as spam you'll
         | learn to be more selective.
        
       | [deleted]
        
       | elgar1212 wrote:
       | > Casey Lewis, a youth-culture consultant who writes the youth-
       | culture newsletter After School, told me over email. "They don't
       | want to be on it, but they feel it's weird if they're not.
       | 
       | A "youth-culture consultant" trying to predict the future? How
       | scientific
       | 
       | Since this whole article is just one big hot take, here's another
       | hot take: eponymous social media as a whole is on the way out.
       | The only stuff anyone can put on eponymous social media is
       | personal brand stuff (think LinkedIn), never anything actually
       | genuine
       | 
       | It's impossible for people to have real engagements under
       | eponymous social media because anything they can say could be
       | turned against them
       | 
       | IG is predominantly just marketing, whether it's people showing
       | off (like LinkedIn), pages trying to build a following with e.g.
       | pet videos so they can make money from ads, annoying influencer
       | "content", or actual overt ads
        
       | x86_64Ubuntu wrote:
       | I don't know if IG is dead, but that Reels nonsense was an
       | absolute fiasco. They kept showing me reels that were nonsensical
       | and were only designed to lead engagement stats from questions of
       | "what is the person trying to do here". Not to mention, the
       | comments on many of these useless vids were always in Turkish. I
       | don't speak Turkish, I've never been to Turkey, yet comments on
       | videos were always in Turkish.
        
         | viburnum wrote:
         | I get the baffling Turkish videos too. It's a shame, instagram
         | used to show me landscape architecture photos that I was
         | genuinely interested in. And it doesn't matter how much I flag
         | it as not interesting, the random videos never stop.
        
         | Kiro wrote:
         | I don't think it's a fiasco. I think Reels are better than
         | TikTok.
        
         | epolanski wrote:
         | I know plenty of friends who can spend hours on reels everyday,
         | my SO is an example, but most of my female friends are the
         | same.
         | 
         | I understand that modern IG may not be the greatest, but
         | engagement wise their choices, at least for the 25+ tier, have
         | paid off imho.
        
           | Kiro wrote:
           | Yeah, I can attest to that. I've went from barely using
           | Instagram to spending a lot of time on it.
        
       | [deleted]
        
       | open-source-ux wrote:
       | There are different segments on Instagram. Perhaps the "lifestyle
       | blogger" or "influencer" has lost it's popularity. However, other
       | audiences are still following different interests on Instagram.
       | There are still thousands of artists (maybe millions) posting
       | their art and illustrations, and still popular on Instagram.
        
       | Mikeb85 wrote:
       | Instagram, like many social networks, is what you make of it and
       | who your friends are.
       | 
       | Pick friends and who you follow well and it's a great experience.
       | Pictures and video are equally supported, discovery is good,
       | search is the best of any social network IMO.
       | 
       | And pro-tip: if your discovery is too full of stuff you don't
       | want, click stuff you don't want and click "not interested".
       | It'll then remove similar posts from your discovery page in the
       | future.
        
         | system16 wrote:
         | That's hardly the case anymore and it's one of the main points
         | the article is making. It doesn't matter who you follow when
         | well over half your feed is composed of ads, suggested reels,
         | and two week old TikTok reposts from random strangers.
        
       | pelasaco wrote:
       | I hope not. I use it as a way to save my moments with my family,
       | in the expectation that It will survive some good years, and
       | therefore my kids can then watch the pics, videos, comments and
       | get a better picture (pun intended) of the context of the photos.
       | Much better than have it in a disk (if its survive) or printed.
        
         | standardUser wrote:
         | Instagram has functionality to download all of your content,
         | including archived stories.
        
           | pelasaco wrote:
           | interesting, I didn't know that.
        
             | standardUser wrote:
             | Facebook too, just FYI!
        
         | ncr100 wrote:
         | This situation is increasingly a concern for me too, and I
         | think replication and shared data ownership is the solution.
         | 
         | Like everyone you care about having a copy of your data, and
         | the copy always being up to date, perhaps encrypted so only
         | those family you want to consume the content have access to
         | those pictures too via user control.
         | 
         | Anyhow it's sad that Facebook has so much of my family's lives
         | hostage... Only there can I see what's up.
         | 
         | I wish I could see a 'family' feed.
        
           | pelasaco wrote:
           | Yes, well i just have it private, i just have the real close
           | friends and family.. thats my message in a bottle to the
           | future.. I hope it reaches the shore, someday.
        
           | pelasaco wrote:
           | > Anyhow it's sad that Facebook has so much of my family's
           | lives hostage... Only there can I see what's up.
           | 
           | I'm not the social media kind of people, but I have some
           | friends and family members, that my last words were through
           | facebook. So as a communication tool, I see its value. Said
           | that, I don't have the app installed anywhere. Just messages
           | notifications via email.
        
           | rglullis wrote:
           | If you don't care at all about popular figures and just want
           | to share content with people you actually know,
           | https://movim.eu would be a much better alternative.
        
         | [deleted]
        
       | DanCarvajal wrote:
       | It's because these apps are longer social in the original sense
       | of social media. Most of my family's sharing of what would have
       | been Instagram or Facebook posts are now in a WhatsApp group I
       | admin. Sure I would have loved to get everyone onto Signal
       | instead but the end result has been much better experience for
       | us.
        
         | MonkeyMalarky wrote:
         | Group chats are wonderful for two very basic, core reasons:
         | chronological and no ads.
        
       | yellow_lead wrote:
       | When Facebook bought it, they prioritized growth over the product
       | itself. This kills the product.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2022-12-03 23:02 UTC)