[HN Gopher] Carmack on star fields in VR
___________________________________________________________________
Carmack on star fields in VR
Author : tosh
Score : 36 points
Date : 2022-12-02 21:49 UTC (1 hours ago)
(HTM) web link (twitter.com)
(TXT) w3m dump (twitter.com)
| HackerNot wrote:
| jws wrote:
| He touches on line graphics as having the same problem rendering.
| I run into that when making strip charts.
|
| In general, the higher level your graphics API, the harder it is
| to get horizontal and vertical lines to draw on the physical
| pixels. At the frame buffer level it is trivial. Cocoa and UIKit
| it is possible with some effort. SwiftUI it is impossible (you
| will end up using the escape hatch to Cocoa or UIKit). HTML is
| hopeless.
|
| When printing meant writing some Postscript it was a little work,
| but doable. Getting it onto a printer through a modern printer
| API is essentially impossible.
|
| Fundamentally this is why most graphs you see online look like
| they were drawn with a worn out felt tip marker. It hides the
| sins at the expense of limiting data density and precision.
| Cullinet wrote:
| Thank you for your report. I have to represent scaled graphs
| also online via browsers and had been curious about the
| implementation of scaling through APIs and ultimately browser
| based drivers. My concern is that the human brain is very much
| better at comprehending spatial dithering, critical for e.g.
| price trend extrapolation, than the open literature gives
| credit. Vital research by CSERIAC at Wright Patterson was
| declassified to sell the post SDI COTS reboot, but heavily
| reclassified after 9/11. This has been to the great detriment
| of the human computer interaction research community which
| really didn't survive into this century.
| bombcar wrote:
| Reminds me of this: http://www.ericbrasseur.org/gamma.html?i=1
| omeze wrote:
| I don't quite understand this (not a graphics dev) -- if you
| have the ability to get the viewport size in a browser, and if
| the display is running at its native resolution, why do you not
| have pixel-perfect accuracy?
| pyrolistical wrote:
| He is talking about actual star fields.
|
| Not to be confused with the upcoming game
| https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Starfield_(video_game)
|
| The title should fix the capitalization and use two worlds
| Cullinet wrote:
| Starfield projection is a critical system. You want to see
| Bogies from the first pixel possible.
| tosh wrote:
| fixed, ty
| abudabi123 wrote:
| NASA should get gaming on this outreach operation potential and
| continue-on John Carmack's tradecraft. Seed $57 million to John
| Carmack's Kerbal Space Program to define and support "perfect"
| star fields in the compositor.
| Cullinet wrote:
| The Executive Order commissioning NASA explicitly mandates the
| primary political psycho political purpose of NASA. NASA never
| has been and cannot be a purely scientific research institution
| and neither can it entertain traditional scientific endeavour.
| This was the reason why The Gipper , the most inscrutable of
| all our Presidents to contemporaries, "friends" (nobody ever
| thought anyone other than Nancy was his true friend) and
| observers both sides of the curtain confirm profusely in
| memoirs that Reagan was every bit the Brinksman who Kruschev
| and Gorbachev reported was the hair trigger risk that got the
| Soviets to first of all write (Kruschev)most conciliatory
| letters and only then write with posture, and the almost
| instantaneous SALT ratification by the Politburo and Duma
| attested to this along with much later (and excellent)
| investigatory research by Martin Sixsmith in particular.
|
| Ed. Gipper not hopper sp.autocorrect
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2022-12-02 23:00 UTC)