[HN Gopher] The enigma of Richard Schultes, Amazonian hallucinog...
___________________________________________________________________
The enigma of Richard Schultes, Amazonian hallucinogens, and
ethnobotany (2020)
Author : drdee
Score : 34 points
Date : 2022-11-30 21:51 UTC (1 days ago)
(HTM) web link (journals.sagepub.com)
(TXT) w3m dump (journals.sagepub.com)
| photochemsyn wrote:
| Interesting article. I understand what the author is saying here,
| but there's a lot of value to be found in taking Schultes'
| position:
|
| > "For Schultes, the non-ordinary states of consciousness
| elicited by ayahuasca were 'intoxications' and 'inebriations' -
| curious for sure, but ultimately illusory. As a consequence, his
| altered states had to be stripped of 'subjective' content as part
| of their translation into 'objective', rational, and universally
| applicable scientific knowledge."
|
| That's precisely the value that the objective scientific approach
| - measurement, observation, not subjective interpretation -
| brings to discussions of psychedelic substances (and to the
| knowledge of the world in general). Of course it's limited, but
| it does provide an unambigous foundation of knowledge - we should
| expect anyone, regardless of cultural history, to agree on the
| same measurements and scientific observations. The flowers have
| this pigment, the plants have these components, this DNA sequence
| distinguishes this subspecies from that subspecies, etc.
|
| Certainly the subjuctive view has some interesting features and
| there's no need to discard it, but one must realize that other
| peoples and other cultures will have quite different
| interpretations of the effects of psychedelics than the original
| users. People create expectations of effects, culturally
| speaking, and then they experience those effects in the correct
| set and setting, as the author describes:
|
| > "This was a classification entirely opposed to that of his
| informants. For Amazonians, it was exactly the subjective content
| of their visions that gave rise to knowledge and insight about
| plants in the first place. The Amazonian cosmologies he
| encountered were directly engaged, informed, and tested through
| the ritual ingestion of the plants in question. The non-ordinary
| states elicited by ayahuasca provided access to realms of reality
| that were perfectly real (Beyer, 2009).31 But because the
| Amazonians' rich cosmological accounts did not fit within
| Schultes's modern scientific world view, in his reading of the
| enigma he systematically undermined their epistemological
| importance and ontological validity by assuming that they could
| be explained in terms of his own metaphysical position. Within
| Schultes's cosmology there was no way for ayahuasca visions to
| provide routes to genuine knowledge - unless they had been
| implausibly scrubbed clean of their subjective content by a
| trained analytical mind and reduced to bifurcating decision trees
| that mirrored the bifurcating taxonomic keys of naturalists
| guidebooks (narcotic, or non-narcotic? strong or weak?). There
| was no way that plants could speak to humans about themselves, no
| way for plants to teach people to sing, no matter how prevalent
| these accounts are among Amazonian holders of plant knowledge
| (Beyer, 2009)."
|
| I have to agree with Schultes - the plants aren't teaching people
| to sing, but they do make it easier for people to pass on vivid
| cultural traditions to other people, by swinging open the doors
| of perception within the human mind.
| echelon_musk wrote:
| Always happy to see Schultes mentioned.
|
| I think it was Wade Davis that said if you were ever to find
| yourself lost amongst any Amazonian tribe that you could say
| Schultes' name and there was a high chance it would be recognised
| due to the number of cultures he contacted.
|
| Embrace of the Serpent is a great film based around some of his
| exploits.
| boole1854 wrote:
| My favorite part was the claim that shamans are able to use their
| plant-induced visions to "influence the weather".
|
| I suppose my skepticism about the veracity of this claim is due
| to my "Western cosmology". Mea culpa!
| dang wrote:
| Can you please not post snarky reflexive responses or shallow
| dismissals? We want _curious_ conversation here.
|
| https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2022-12-01 23:01 UTC)