[HN Gopher] Blue Peter discovers the Internet (1995) [video]
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Blue Peter discovers the Internet (1995) [video]
        
       Author : outputchannel
       Score  : 61 points
       Date   : 2022-11-29 09:28 UTC (1 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.youtube.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.youtube.com)
        
       | elischleifer wrote:
       | "The information superhighway" - great callback. I love the scan
       | lines running across the CRT as she's talking in the opening
       | clip.
        
       | muglug wrote:
       | Interesting to see broadcast video from 27 years ago preserved in
       | such high quality. The BBC has spent a lot of money to preserve
       | pretty much everything it has broadcast in the last 30 years.
        
         | szaroubi wrote:
         | it wasn't always part of the BBC's reflexes to keep all the
         | content. They must have learned and adapted.
        
           | fredoralive wrote:
           | Blue Peter actually has a really good survival rate, most
           | stuff from the mid-1960s onwards survives. Whilst this is
           | perhaps partly forward thinking on the part of Editor[1]
           | Biddy Baxter, AFAIK it was partly so older material could be
           | reused in later editions to save money.
           | 
           | [1] The title of the "showrunner" of Blue Peter, so in the
           | meaning of "editor of a newspaper", not "videotape editor".
        
         | fredoralive wrote:
         | You'd hope the original broadcaster would have broadcast
         | quality archives. It's not like they'd keep them on LP VHS.
         | 
         | The BBC has had to do various work to keep the archives
         | accessible, mid-90s stuff like this was probably recorded on D3
         | digital composite tape, but that's now long obsolete, so has to
         | be transferred to modern formats (nowadays as files on LTO tape
         | AFAIK). AFAIK stuff on 2" quad (the first practical video tape
         | format, used from the 1950s to early 80s) has been transferred
         | at least twice, from quad to D3 or DigiBeta, then to files.
        
       | eddieroger wrote:
       | I miss the quaintness of being on the old Internet. Maybe it's
       | just the Endless September of it all, but the content seemed more
       | cared for when it wasn't trivial to put out. I do think it's
       | great that barriers for publishing are lower than what they were,
       | but sometimes I sure do wonder if they're too easy, of people are
       | too connected. Maybe that's just what getting old feels like?
        
         | bbarnett wrote:
         | _I miss the quaintness of being on the old Internet._
         | 
         | I think that back then, you'd often host your own site. Or at
         | least, write most of it in HTML.
         | 
         | It was mostly your content, and maybe if on geocities or
         | something, a few ads around the edges.
         | 
         | Now, it's 280 chars surrounded by a whole page of, what is
         | realistically, ads or 'not you' content.
         | 
         | Content is broken up, piecemeal, not one.
         | 
         | While you can setup a singular resource, it's more rare for
         | people to do.
         | 
         | Many old pages were just a text menu on the left "birds", "my
         | dog", "the month I spent travelling", and then deep content.
         | 
         | Now you get mostly reactionary fluff "Can you believe the
         | horrible thing I read!!!"
        
           | PaulDavisThe1st wrote:
           | > Now you get mostly reactionary fluff "Can you believe the
           | horrible thing I read!!!"
           | 
           | Could be worth checking the mirror there.
        
             | bbarnett wrote:
             | Reactionary fluff != citing reactionary fluff.
        
       | PeterStuer wrote:
       | As history would have it, blue peter would have loved the 2022
       | MAP friendly internet.
        
         | pjc50 wrote:
         | "MAP"?
        
           | frameset wrote:
           | "Minor Attracted Persons", I think OP is trolling.
        
       | pjc50 wrote:
       | Little period details:
       | 
       | - strobing CRT monitors that don't line up with the frequency of
       | the TV camera
       | 
       | - PCs in the internet cafe, Macs in media, Acorn Archimedes (with
       | ARM processor!) in schools
       | 
       | - first thing to do with the global communications network is
       | send a dumb message to the US President
       | 
       | - indexed-color images; you can see in one case when she changes
       | windows and the colours go wrong in the background as the palette
       | is swapped.
       | 
       | - very early HTML without even a DOCTYPE
       | 
       | - "all secondary schools are to be linked to the internet by the
       | end of the year" (I would put money on that not having happened
       | for several more years)
        
         | onion2k wrote:
         | _strobing CRT monitors that don 't line up with the frequency
         | of the TV camera_
         | 
         | I studied Broadcast Engineering for my degree back in 1997, and
         | you could definitely shift the input signal to match the
         | refresh rate of a CRT screen or a flourescent tube light on the
         | Sony BetaCam TV studio cameras I worked with. I reckon the BBC
         | would have been working with similar or better tech in 1995. I
         | wonder if this might have been a directorial choice to show
         | what viewers expect rather than any technical issue.
        
           | worldofmatthew wrote:
           | In most scenes, the refresh rate is matched (Slightly off
           | from the presenters computer in the internet cafe with the
           | computer all most all other computers in the cafe set to a
           | different refresh rate).
        
           | colanderman wrote:
           | While television refresh rates on both sides of the pond
           | matched local grid frequency, did computer monitor refresh
           | rates necessarily match? VGA for example supported 60 Hz but
           | not 50 Hz according to Wikipedia [1]. So in the UK, I would
           | think you could sync with fluorescent lights, or VGA
           | monitors, but not both (unless you recorded at say 10 fps).
           | 
           | [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Video_Graphics_Array#Techni
           | cal...
        
         | johannes1234321 wrote:
         | > - first thing to do with the global communications network is
         | send a dumb message to the US President
         | 
         | For me that also was about the first website I visited back
         | around that time when I had friends over, who didn't know
         | Internet to show how easy you can get there from Europe.
         | 
         | Second stop was the local city councils page, and checking why
         | my physics teacher was supporting for proposals as counselor.
        
         | jameshart wrote:
         | I wonder if the 'linking schools to the internet' was more
         | about the rollout of the .sch.uk domain name than about actual
         | physical internet connectivity. In 1995 'getting on the
         | internet' was still largely a case of dial up to an ISP, and
         | while schools in general probably had a PBX system on an ISDN,
         | turning those into 'internet' was not just a case of enabling a
         | data plan.
         | 
         | And then on the school end, they might have had a lab of
         | computers, but 1) probably Acorn Archimedes at best and 2)
         | probably on an econet rather than Ethernet LAN if networked at
         | all; so getting those computers 'linked up' to the internet was
         | going to be tricky.
         | 
         | So your 'linked to the internet' school would more likely be
         | one PC in an office on dialup to an ISP for email.
         | 
         | Or maybe a simple webpage hosted by a friendly local
         | university?
        
       | jdalgetty wrote:
       | Those were magical times
        
       | robin_reala wrote:
       | For people who weren't kids in the UK, Blue Peter is a very long
       | running weekly BBC TV programme aimed at kids. Common tropes
       | include the studio pet(s) and garden, charity events, and the
       | Blue Peter badge that you got for sending in a letter with a tip
       | or other challenges (and which qualified you for various
       | discounts at venues around the UK).
       | 
       | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blue_Peter
        
         | KineticLensman wrote:
         | A Brit who when demonstrating some sort of art or craft says
         | "Here's one I prepared earlier" is often referencing the Blue
         | Peter art segments where they would start to assemble (say) a
         | model of Tracy Island from 'sticky back plastic' and toilet
         | rolls and then cut to a superbly finished creation.
         | 
         | It's the artistic equivalent of Step 1: take these household
         | materials, Step 2: ???, Step 3: Profit!
        
           | kevin_thibedeau wrote:
           | So you're saying the gnomes have already invaded Airstrip
           | One?
        
           | moosedev wrote:
           | I feel its spiritual meme-cousin is this one:
           | https://amp.knowyourmeme.com/memes/how-to-draw-an-owl
        
         | nonrandomstring wrote:
         | British people of a certain age can be defined by their Blue
         | Peter credentials and activities, rather like a geek-code. Mine
         | FWIW; Lesley Judd, Peter Purves, John Noakes, Shep the Dog,
         | Collecting milk bottle tops to buy a donkey (for some reason).
        
         | jgrahamc wrote:
         | Yes! One of my prized possessions is that badge and letter from
         | Biddy Baxter.
        
           | robin_reala wrote:
           | I've got my badge somewhere, but no idea what happened to the
           | reply. Guess it would have been Yvette Fielding era? (I sent
           | in a way to recycle used christmas cards into decorative
           | balls for the next year's celebrations, which in retrospect
           | seems almost tailored for the acquisition of a badge.)
        
         | pjc50 wrote:
         | > very long running
         | 
         | Since 1958 and over 5,000 episodes!
         | 
         | (so much of classic UK TV is either "has been broadcasting
         | since the dawn of television in a largely unchanged format" or
         | the other extreme of "we only ever made six episodes back in
         | the 1970s and they are etched across everyone's childhood")
        
           | bearmode wrote:
           | It blew my mind when, as an adult, I learned that there were
           | only 15 episodes of Mr Bean (with one of those being a "Best
           | Bits of Mr Bean" episode!).
        
             | dmitriid wrote:
             | WAT
             | 
             | W and I cannot stress this enough AT?!!!!!!
             | 
             | We had multiple _re-runs_ of it in the 90s in various post-
             | Soviet countries.
        
             | darrenf wrote:
             | See also: there are only 12 episodes of Fawlty Towers.
        
             | bartread wrote:
             | To be honest I don't necessarily see this as a bad thing. I
             | like a lot of Rowan Atkinson's work but I _absolutely
             | hated_ Mr Bean. Something about watching someone be inept
             | in every possible way causes me a huge amount of stress and
             | isn 't something I'm able to derive any sense of enjoyment
             | or fun from. If there were more episodes it might have
             | become more of a cultural meme (like, say, The Simpsons),
             | which I'd find really hard to deal with.
             | 
             |  _(This doesn 't always follow, of course. The UK version
             | of The Office is only 12 regular episodes plus a couple of
             | specials, yet it's impact is still very much felt - at
             | least in the UK - so I don't necessarily see there being a
             | simple correlation between quantity of material and
             | cultural significance. As much as the US series is also
             | excellent I don't think it carries quite the same iconic
             | status or cultural weight here even though there are a lot
             | more episodes - obviously it might do in the US.)_
        
           | teh_klev wrote:
           | > "we only ever made six episodes back in the 1970s and they
           | are etched across everyone's childhood"
           | 
           | Or alternatively sometimes scarred for life :)
           | 
           | And if taking a trip back through 1970's UK TV is something
           | anyone's interested in then this is a fun book:
           | 
           | https://www.lulu.com/shop/stephen-brotherstone-dave-
           | lawrence...
        
       | nickdothutton wrote:
       | This must be some kind of fake history, where are all the ads on
       | the web sites? Where are the pages jumping around as the browser
       | reflows the content? Why are there no auto playing videos? Next
       | you will be telling me nobody used their real names on the
       | Internet in those days. Definitely fake.
        
         | colanderman wrote:
         | These absolutely existed. Image-heavy pages for which designers
         | didn't specify the image size in HTML (i.e. many/most pages)
         | jumped like crazy as the images slowly loaded over a modem.
         | Maybe no auto-playing videos, but auto playing GIFs, MIDI
         | files, and _Java applets_ (!) were common, not to mention
         | <marquee> and <blink> tags.
         | 
         | Heck, I was about to joke about cookie banners not being a
         | thing -- but they sort of were, as they had just been invented
         | (1994 [1]), and any site which relied on them inevitably had
         | some prominent text exhorting you to use a browser which
         | supported them (whether you already were or not). (Or frames --
         | the very first web page I visited -- nintendo.com -- I was
         | greeted with Cranky Kong lecturing me about frame support.)
         | This was of course right next to the ubiquitous "best viewed in
         | Netscape Navigator / Internet Explorer" badge.
         | 
         | Oh and don't forget the _toolbar plugins_. Anyone from the
         | cohort for whom the phrase  "eternal September" was invented to
         | describe had between 3-7 of these in their browser, each one
         | taking up another half inch of real estate. So top to bottom
         | you'd have:
         | 
         | * title bar
         | 
         | * menu bar
         | 
         | * (enormous) navigation bar
         | 
         | * bookmark toolbar
         | 
         | * AOL toolbar
         | 
         | * Yahoo! toolbar
         | 
         | * Ask Jeeves toolbar
         | 
         | * Bonzi Buddy toolbar or some other spyware
         | 
         | * anti-spyware toolbar
         | 
         | * web page
         | 
         | * horizontal scroll bar
         | 
         | * status bar
         | 
         | * Windows dock
         | 
         | And the web page itself was often divided up into multiple
         | frames (for ads or navigation or just by accident), each with
         | their own scroll bars because they'd be just a pixel too large
         | to fit in their allotted space. Probably only a 1/4 of the full
         | screen real estate would actually show content.
         | 
         | [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTTP_cookie#History
        
         | pjc50 wrote:
         | I know it's a joke, but you made me look up when the first
         | banner ad was, and it appears to be 1994:
         | https://digiday.com/media/history-of-the-banner-ad/
         | 
         | The BBC brand guidelines would never have allowed an ad to
         | appear, though.
        
         | teux wrote:
         | I know it's sarcasm but the thought of a small 64x64 video
         | auto-playing at 0.25fps is hilarious to me.
        
           | pjc50 wrote:
           | Animated GIFs! Usually for the "under construction" logo.
        
           | dmitriid wrote:
           | You never played Porntris I see. Note, NSFW,
           | https://www.retrogames.cz/play_445-DOS.php?language=EN
        
           | johannes1234321 wrote:
           | Oh, RealVideo had you covered.
        
       | mcast wrote:
       | This captures a very interesting time back when the internet was
       | seen culturally in a positive light with much academic potential.
       | Later documentaries about the internet became more pessimistic
       | and focused on cyber stalking, privacy abuse, hackers/viruses, et
       | al. It truly was simpler times.
        
       | halfdeadcat wrote:
       | The things that made me feel older than anything was: When they
       | recorded the audio clip for their webpage, they used Massive
       | Attack's "Unfinished Sympathy" as the background audio. I still
       | love that tune. Of course, they couldn't get away with using that
       | now without proper licensing.
        
         | 0898 wrote:
         | The BBC has a unique exception when it comes to music, I
         | believe. That's why you often hear The Beatles in the
         | Eastenders cafe. ITV couldn't do that.
        
           | teh_klev wrote:
           | > ITV couldn't do that.
           | 
           | Yes they can, all they need to do is stump up for the
           | licenses the same as the BBC do via organisations such as the
           | PRS:
           | 
           | https://www.prsformusic.com/
           | 
           | https://www.prsformusic.com/licences/broadcasting-music-
           | on-t...
        
           | dspillett wrote:
           | They have a blanket licence agreements with PRS and similar
           | organisations. IIRC is only covers using some number of
           | seconds of any given track, and to use an entire piece (or
           | larger part there-of) separate permission must be requested
           | (and perhaps paid for).
        
           | secretsatan wrote:
           | Yes, the BBC used to license tons of music (still does?),
           | they had some really cool background music for all sorts of
           | stuff by really good artists. Late shows on Radio one used to
           | be legendary for the variety of alternative music they played
        
           | heurisko wrote:
           | Don't know if that is true.
           | 
           | https://www.bbc.com/academy-guides/music-copyright-in-tv-
           | wha...
        
       | onion2k wrote:
       | The browser in the video is a very early Netscape Navigator
       | (v1.0N maybe..) written by Marc Andreessen and others, who
       | founded Netscape and went on to found Andreessen Horowitz which
       | has invested in lots of YC startups.
        
         | aliqot wrote:
         | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Q7FTjhvZ7Y
         | 
         | Project Code Rush
         | 
         | Code Rush is a documentary following the lives of a group of
         | Netscape engineers in Silicon Valley. It covers Netscape's last
         | year as an independent company, from their announcement of the
         | Mozilla open source project until their acquisition by AOL. It
         | particularly focuses on the last minute rush to make the
         | Mozilla source code ready for release by the deadline of March
         | 31 1998, and the impact on the engineers' lives and families as
         | they attempt to save the company from ruin.
        
       | jonatron wrote:
       | Blue Peter bury time capsules and dig them up occasionally. I
       | think I remember watching one getting buried. I just looked up
       | one being dug up, it was much less interesting than I could've
       | imagined.
        
       | petesergeant wrote:
       | Did Blue Peter always have such cool backing music? That sounds
       | like Massive Attack Unfinished Sympathy...
        
         | nsxwolf wrote:
         | It is! I didn't realize the song was that old. 1991!
        
           | PaulDavisThe1st wrote:
           | Massive Attack were approximately 40 years ahead of their
           | time.
        
       | dghughes wrote:
       | I was watching a video of the BBC show Micro Live explaining how
       | email works...in 1986! And it was done live.
       | 
       | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GL1NaenGPdw
        
         | jgrahamc wrote:
         | Did you notice that at the start the acoustic coupler has the
         | handset placed the wrong way round?
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2022-11-30 23:02 UTC)