[HN Gopher] The Great Renaming 1985 - 1988 (2000)
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       The Great Renaming 1985 - 1988 (2000)
        
       Author : susam
       Score  : 87 points
       Date   : 2022-11-24 18:04 UTC (4 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.livinginternet.info)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.livinginternet.info)
        
       | mrlonglong wrote:
       | It's still around. I still use it daily.
        
       | Aldipower wrote:
       | Times when real flame wars existed. Fought by persons and
       | characters, not by big media.
       | 
       | "During the Cabal's last days, its death was quicken by
       | "comp.women" debacle, as it was later known. In summer, 1988, a
       | newsgroup for woman was proposed. Its creation became the subject
       | of a massive flame war because its supporters wanted to put it in
       | the comp.* groups because this would insure a better propagation.
       | Opponents noted that this hierarchy was devoted to far more
       | technical things. After _much_ discussion someone created a
       | "comp.society.woman" out of exasperation. This person got a great
       | deal of flamage for doing so, but the group came to life after it
       | was created. "
        
         | dmix wrote:
         | Nerds love obsessing about the perfect way to categorize things
        
           | IIAOPSW wrote:
           | In the most technical sense possible, they were in fact
           | objectifying women.
        
       | [deleted]
        
       | syrrim wrote:
       | Interesting article. I sometimes wonder to what degree we moderns
       | are simply recreating the (failed) systems of old. We are trying
       | to move from twitter to "federated" systems, which are
       | structurally quite similar to usenet. What lessons are we going
       | to learn about why people broadly moved away from usenet to web
       | forums?
        
         | Aldipower wrote:
         | I still can remember, that there was a technical hurdle to
         | connect to the Usenet. My memory is from mid-nineties. You had
         | to find the usenet server of your provider, which wasn't
         | broadly pronounce, or even another one. This wasn't feasible
         | for most people. Web forums worked in the browser.
        
           | GekkePrutser wrote:
           | The same was the case with everything else in those days. You
           | had to set up winsock, set your POP3 and SMTP, SLIP/PPP etc.
           | If you weren't technical you were just not on it or you had
           | someone else set it up for you.
           | 
           | We're talking mid-90s and Windows 95 made things a little
           | better but it was still a mess because Microsoft thought they
           | could make their own internet knockoff MSN a success. So they
           | put much more effort into that at first. Thank God they were
           | unsuccessful because the online world would have been even
           | more commercial than it is now. Even now they're willing to
           | risk the tiny market share of edge by spamming people with
           | "special offers"
           | 
           | Webmail was still pretty new and not fully functional. Usenet
           | was just one of the many things to set up. I don't think this
           | was the reason it didn't take off.
        
         | jcynix wrote:
         | Usenet still exists and the store and forward transport
         | mechanism (nntp) and its flooding concept would be fine to
         | transport todays "tweets" or "toots" ...
         | 
         | I managed one of the top 100 nodes in the nineties. Two reasons
         | made end users prefer other systems: interactive editing
         | (wysiwyg) as in forum software transfering onto web sites and
         | pictures.
         | 
         | Usenet readers to offer both features could have been
         | developed. And running private leaf nodes (as a number of
         | people did) would have been possible. Instead people moved to
         | other platforms and reinvented many wheels, not always in a
         | better version.
         | 
         | Archiving Usenet articles is and was easy. A forum on the other
         | hand is a tiny walled garden and if the people running it quit,
         | the content is lost.
         | 
         | For adventurous people: its still possible to get a Usenet
         | connection, e.g. for a small fee at http://news.individual.de/
         | (intro page in German, but Google or Deepl will translate it
         | for you ;-) ... disclaimer: I'm just a customer myself there.
        
           | GekkePrutser wrote:
           | Spam would be a huge problem on it though if it were that
           | widely used. It was just not designed to stand up to that
           | kind of abuse. It lacks sender verification etc. Just like
           | SMTP is kludge upon kludge and totally broken, and nobody has
           | done a real modern rewrite because nobody wants to deal with
           | all the legacy.
        
           | codetrotter wrote:
           | > its still possible to get a Usenet connection, e.g. for a
           | small fee at http://news.individual.de/
           | 
           | Does this include access to alt.binaries.* ?
        
             | jcynix wrote:
             | No alt.binaries.* there. The (large) list of the groups
             | they carry is available at ftp://ftp.fu-
             | berlin.de/doc/news/fu-berlin/active
        
       | dmd wrote:
       | I am proud to be mentioned in the net.legends FAQ.
        
         | _0ffh wrote:
         | Ah, I see you are a 14 Year Old Neuroimaging Wizard, great
         | work! =)
        
       | ggm wrote:
       | Mark V Shany was interesting but also.. wierd
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2022-11-24 23:00 UTC)