[HN Gopher] Hacker News Parody Thread (2013)
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Hacker News Parody Thread (2013)
        
       Author : AkshatJ27
       Score  : 955 points
       Date   : 2022-11-20 13:14 UTC (9 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (bradconte.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (bradconte.com)
        
       | tomxor wrote:
       | I post to simply state my appreciation and amusement :D
       | 
       | ... but I will be downvoted due to being neither insightful nor
       | argumentative.
        
       | input_sh wrote:
       | Unrealistic.
       | 
       | Not a single person complained about link not working with
       | JavaScript disabled.
        
         | weinzierl wrote:
         | ... and no one about site's contrast or scroll hijacking...
        
         | Justin_K wrote:
         | This.
        
         | marginalia_nu wrote:
         | I wish they would just rewrite the website in a safe language
         | like Rust.
        
           | geoduck14 wrote:
           | Or PHP
        
           | aklein wrote:
           | I have stuff to say about JIT.
        
             | dweekly wrote:
             | I have a correction to your understanding of JIT.
        
           | rpastuszak wrote:
           | *zig
           | 
           | Rust feels too 2019
        
             | mirekrusin wrote:
             | As a ruby guy, does it really matter which language it's
             | written in if it works?
        
               | thatwasunusual wrote:
               | As a Perl guy: yes. :(
        
               | Kye wrote:
               | There is no escape.
        
               | wruza wrote:
               | _As a Perl guy: yes. :(_
               | 
               | Warning all, don't paste this into your shell!
        
           | daniel-cussen wrote:
        
         | wooque wrote:
         | Or complained about accessibility
        
         | timeon wrote:
         | Since it was missing there I realized how am I overusing '[-]'
         | instead of scrolling. Like Tarzan swing on vines.
         | 
         | (Also is this relavant or am I just piggy-backing your top
         | comment?)
        
           | andreareina wrote:
           | Have you heard about our lord and savior
           | root|parent|prev|next ?
        
             | mdp2021 wrote:
             | > _our lord and savior root|parent|prev|next_
             | 
             | You are welcome! My very small contribution to the system
             | (I asked and "pushed" for it) - of course, Dang and/or his
             | team implemented it. It is pleasant to read about it in
             | such appreciative terms.
        
           | starkd wrote:
           | Wow. I just realized the [-] feature. This changes everything
           | about HN!
        
             | jason-phillips wrote:
             | I call it the "minimize bullshit" feature. Reddit also has
             | it.
        
             | anon7725 wrote:
             | And I just realized "root|parent|prev|next" despite being
             | ride or die with [-]
        
           | nicky0 wrote:
           | In 10 years of reading hacker news I never thought to press
           | the [-] until this moment.
        
             | [deleted]
        
             | tomger wrote:
             | I always assumed [-] subtracted a point from that comment.
        
               | geoduck14 wrote:
               | Important fact: The [-] does _not_ remove a point. After
               | you get 500 points, you earn the privilege of _down
               | voting_ , you will get a "down triangle" underneath the
               | "up vote up triangle" that you can click on.
        
               | RheingoldRiver wrote:
               | [-] collapses the replies so that you can easily see
               | what's next. On reddit the equivalent functionality is a
               | button literally called "hide child comments."
               | 
               | But as another comment mentioned, you can click root |
               | parent | prev | next to get navigated through the thread.
               | Personally, I prefer the collapse, though, as having the
               | top of my screen move without my direct control is a bit
               | jarring, but there's more functionality from these
               | buttons.
        
               | turbonaut wrote:
               | Doesn't [-] set it to zero?
               | 
               | https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brainfuck
        
             | thatwasunusual wrote:
             | > In 10 years of reading hacker news I never thought to
             | press the [-] until this moment.
             | 
             | I thought you had to click the [-]. How do I press the [-]?
        
               | jcpham2 wrote:
               | I don't understand if I should click or press [-] What
               | does it do?
        
               | _hyn3 wrote:
               | Don't do it! If I understand it correctly, every time you
               | use it, it takes away one of your valuable internet
               | points.
        
               | thatwasunusual wrote:
               | A friend of mine did this too many times. He is in rehab
               | now. His wife left him, his liberal left kids commited
               | suicide etc. Harsh times.
        
               | thatwasunusual wrote:
               | How can you click OR press something?
        
               | kergonath wrote:
               | > I thought you had to click the [-].
               | 
               | I cannot click anything on my phone.
        
               | [deleted]
        
             | hoosieree wrote:
             | Relevant XKCD: https://xkcd.com/1053/
        
           | jwilk wrote:
           | Kinda relevant, because [-] doesn't work with JS disabled.
           | :-P
        
           | neonihil wrote:
           | Most useful comment on the whole thread. Thanks for the tip
           | about the [-].
        
         | giancarlostoro wrote:
         | As a JavaScript guy, does this really matter for 95% of the
         | world?
        
         | slowmotiony wrote:
         | I appreciate the juicy center of good humor inside your comment
         | of rage. Maybe the following will help. You're right, of
         | course. It's just that there are competing values, so we have
         | to make a tradeoff. One value is usability and having web
         | content be less annoying, intrusive, abusive, and so on. No
         | disagreement there. I think most HN readers share similar
         | feelings about these things; certainly I do. The other value is
         | curiosity. Curiosity likes new things, different things [0],
         | unexpected things--things it can learn from. It doesn't do so
         | well with repetition [1], indignation, or genericness [2].
         | These two values conflict because complaints about the former
         | tend to be repetitive, indignant, and generic. How to decide
         | the conflict? That question actually has a clear answer,
         | because we're trying to optimize for just one thing here,
         | namely intellectual curiosity [3]. So that value has to win.
         | This is one of those cases where it's super helpful to have
         | just one thing you're optimizing for and to know exactly what
         | it is. It's not that this is the 'right' decision, the
         | 'correct' guideline, or anything like that--it's just correct
         | relative to what we're trying to optimize for.
         | 
         | [0]
         | https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=false&so...
         | 
         | [1]
         | https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=false&so...
         | 
         | [2]
         | https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&que...
        
           | [deleted]
        
         | kergonath wrote:
         | Even worse, not a single comment about Rust and use-after-free
         | bugs.
        
         | ironmagma wrote:
         | Or about how React bloatware introduces tens of petabytes of
         | completely unnecessary dependencies, is destroying the Web, a
         | perfectly-designed hypertext platform for linking documents
         | together for reading on all manner of devices from
         | screenreaders to Braille interfaces and toaster ovens.
        
           | [deleted]
        
           | anon7725 wrote:
           | Nodding along .... - "oh shit this is a parody thread"
        
         | [deleted]
        
         | acqbu wrote:
         | Why isn't this at the top?
        
         | weego wrote:
         | Also missing:
         | 
         | How does this compare to X? (where X is an obscure project on
         | github with no documentation of what it's feature boundaries
         | are, has at best 1000 stars and further internet sleuthing
         | suggests its at best only tangentially associated with the
         | original comments domain.
         | 
         | The end result being the author feels obliged to figure it out
         | and reply incase not doing so seems arrogant and/or poorly
         | educated in the domain)
        
           | juped wrote:
           | Oh no, not a mere 1000 Facebook likes!
        
         | antihero wrote:
         | Not a single person went on about vue
        
           | jablala wrote:
           | No Svelte either, I'm in shambles.
        
         | matheusmoreira wrote:
         | I'm just replying here to piggyback on the top comment and
         | create a pointer to this thread in my CheckRepliesToMyComments
         | page.
        
           | InCityDreams wrote:
           | Obligatory xkcd reference.
        
           | breck wrote:
           | I predicted something similar a long time ago (2022) here:
           | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33680851
        
         | xeromal wrote:
         | Or back button hijack
        
           | zozbot234 wrote:
           | Off-topic aside, but why do people complain about back-button
           | hijack when you can long-press or right-click and get out of
           | the site? It works on any browser AIUI.
        
             | sokoloff wrote:
             | Why do sites do a back-button hijack if it's possible to
             | use the long-press menu-select feature?
             | 
             | Because it's nowhere near equally convenient or standard to
             | do so.
        
       | newaccount2021 wrote:
        
       | [deleted]
        
       | sseagull wrote:
       | It's got one glaring omission IMO - references to sci-fi
       | literature. They crop up in a lot of threads :)
        
         | ZeroGravitas wrote:
         | One of the usernames is "scificharacter".
        
       | [deleted]
        
       | nesarkvechnep wrote:
       | Very happy that "tangential" and "could you elaborate" are in
       | there.
        
         | bityard wrote:
         | "Could you elaborate" always gets me... I can never decide if
         | they are trolls or people who don't understand how
         | conversations work
        
       | karaterobot wrote:
       | I'm someone who clearly didn't read the article, because I raise
       | several points which were directly addressed by the author, but I
       | do not refer to them at all in my very angry comment. It's
       | possible the only thing I know about this article is the title,
       | which it's also possible I misread in my eagerness to have my
       | thoughts known by the internet.
        
         | karaterobot wrote:
         | And I am someone who is responding to that comment, and it's
         | clear I haven't carefully read either the article, or even the
         | comment I'm responding to.
        
       | lbrito wrote:
       | Nearly perfect.
       | 
       | You missed the mandatory post on how I can read the author's blog
       | post for 400 hours without recharging on my superior Mac M1,
       | versus just 10 minutes on pleb Linux boxes.
        
       | philosopher1234 wrote:
       | Not brutal enough.
        
       | wingely wrote:
       | It's missing the part where someone suggests stupidity and
       | obtuseness on the part of anyone who questions free markets
       | outside of theoretical experiments.
       | 
       | Similarly, it's missing the comment from a woman-identified
       | person that is followed by negging from male users.
       | 
       | Edit: proving my point
        
       | anshumankmr wrote:
       | Nice article.
        
         | weird-eye-issue wrote:
         | I downvoted you just to keep it inline with the OP
        
       | bawolff wrote:
       | > Here's a long detailed, objective explanation of everything
       | related to this issue. It's probably more useful than the actual
       | link and it may serve as one of the best efforts to consolidate
       | information on this subject on the entire Internet. If it
       | contains original research only a couple of readers will be
       | qualified to tell. Half the people who upvote this won't
       | understand more than the first two paragraphs.
       | 
       | Exactly explains the value of hn, when this happens.
        
         | prox wrote:
         | Absolutely. Sometimes you get a comment thread where some
         | specialists add way more than "average" commenters could
         | actually add. I like it because it gives insights in difficult
         | subjects!
        
       | svnpenn wrote:
       | Missed the part where people use acronyms that no one
       | understands.
        
       | motohagiography wrote:
       | This is hilarious, but this is the best we have! But since it's
       | funny, one must concede the truth that made it so. Well done.
        
       | graderjs wrote:
       | > simulated HN top bar
       | 
       | Here's a hyper-anal correction that is itself correct, but
       | doesn't exactly contradict the OP.
       | 
       | Actually, logged-in simulation-user icandownvote (500 karma)
       | can't actually down vote _yet_.
       | 
       | This is genius
       | 
       | Also, check out the top bar link hrefs:
       | 
       | new | threads | comments | ask | jobs | submit
       | 
       | new - http://news.ycombinator.com/TakeADeepBreath
       | 
       | threads -
       | http://news.ycombinator.com/CheckRepliesToMyComments?id=ican...
       | 
       | comments - http://news.ycombinator.com/KillACoupleMinutes
       | 
       | ask -
       | http://news.ycombinator.com/KickstartADiscussionNoOneWillPar...
       | 
       | jobs - http://news.ycombinator.com/AnyoneActuallyClickThis?
       | 
       | submit -
       | http://news.ycombinator.com/ACommentorIncludedAnAwesomeLink,...
       | 
       | Sound the klaxons, that link includes http not _https_ don 't
       | people know the security risks?!
       | 
       | Also, I'm going for a couple of genres with the above
        
         | robswc wrote:
         | >Here's a hyper-anal correction that is itself correct, but
         | doesn't exactly contradict the OP.
         | 
         | I've always hated this. Thankfully I've found it happens much,
         | much less on HN vs say reddit haha.
         | 
         | The cherry on top is how the correction is effectively useless.
        
           | graderjs wrote:
           | But to the ultra self important pedants, they don't see it
           | that way at all...it's not useless it's a _fundamental
           | reality_ that you'd be a _complete idiot_ not to _fully
           | appreciate_ ...just make sure you also worship their
           | brilliance in deigning to illuminate you
        
       | AkshatJ27 wrote:
       | Previously: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5326511
        
         | Pigalowda wrote:
         | I didn't know there was an HN karma leaderboard!
         | 
         | https://news.ycombinator.com/leaders
        
         | Semaphor wrote:
         | The 2013 thread is pure gold.
        
           | jfengel wrote:
           | I really appreciate that I had no idea this was a decade old.
           | The Internet changes every day but people remain the same.
        
       | uncletaco wrote:
       | This is too generous considering none of these comments trigger
       | an unrelated and subtly racist political response.
        
         | InCityDreams wrote:
         | *hey, don't forget the Nationalists.
        
       | nfRfqX5n wrote:
       | Not enough anecdotes
        
       | wg0 wrote:
       | While I like the idea in general but instead of hosting it as a
       | static file, SQLie table would have been a more accessible
       | approach not to mention that it is far easier to query from Rust.
       | 
       | Heck you could even compile SQLite and Rust both to Webassbly as
       | Cloud flare edge workers but I'll not go that far.
        
       | klohto wrote:
       | I'm missing a rant about why is it a Twitter thread and not a
       | blog post
        
         | Kye wrote:
         | Also the long, tedious argument following from a polite
         | correction to using the wrong pronouns for the author.
        
       | kretaceous wrote:
       | Should be posted by todsacerdoti + a top comments by Gigachad or
       | tptacek, screenshot of an insightful comment posted to Twitter by
       | swyx.
        
       | legohead wrote:
       | Where's the random guy making a silly, reddit-like joke and being
       | downvoted into oblivion with a snide reply about how this is HN
       | not reddit?
        
         | CRConrad wrote:
         | Here, here!
        
       | CommieBobDole wrote:
       | This is pretty good, but to be peak HN the thread needs to have
       | 'showdead' on and include three greyed-out comments: One claiming
       | that the OP is wrong because he is a nefarious Jew, one half-page
       | comment of entirely incomprehensible word salad, and a comment
       | trying to sell boner pills in broken English with a misspelled
       | URL that goes nowhere.
        
       | tekla wrote:
       | Is it really a parody if its indistinguishable from the real
       | thing?
       | 
       | Also missing a section where someone makes a statement as a fact
       | and has a response from an expert explaining why they are wrong.
        
         | synu wrote:
         | Usually also highly upvoted because it sounds right.
        
       | pwdisswordfish9 wrote:
       | The best Hacker News parody is at https://news.ycombinator.com
        
         | woolion wrote:
         | Wrong, it's at https://hackernews.com, that weird link you
         | posted is probably a phishing site.
        
       | zozbot234 wrote:
       | Too bad that n-gate.com stopped updating in mid-2021. It was
       | great for this stuff, and arguably it still is.
       | 
       | Edit: Don't miss the usernames in OP's parody thread though,
       | they're just as hard to spot as on actual HN (which is a great
       | feature of this site) but I thought they were the funniest part.
        
         | AtlasBarfed wrote:
         | The definitive hacker news mindset takedown. A cold bucket of
         | water on silicon valley. I miss it so much, mostly because it
         | was so insightful.
         | 
         | Alas, no one will know because... you didn't pilotfish-post on
         | firstpost comment.
        
         | TheWoodsy wrote:
         | I was scrolling for this. I always forget the URL and when I
         | find it I'm saddened to find no updates :\
        
         | neilv wrote:
         | When telling people about HN, I'd emphasize first reading the
         | guidelines, and not treating it like other social media. Then
         | I'd say, when some comment thread goes intolerable, they can
         | get relief by reading some n-gate. (Though the content of the
         | last post precluded mentioning it at the company where I was
         | working.)
         | 
         | I hope the n-gate person is well, and that they didn't blow a
         | gasket, taking on the burdens of too many HNers.
        
       | donohoe wrote:
       | The site UX on mobile is awful - so it's very consistent with the
       | real thing :)
        
       | davidjhall wrote:
       | Missing "I can't view the site on my mobile phone."
        
         | rzzzt wrote:
         | > Please don't complain about tangential annoyances--e.g.
         | article or website formats, name collisions, or back-button
         | breakage. They're too common to be interesting.
         | 
         | On a _tangential note_ , did this guideline change recently? In
         | some search results "e.g." changes to "things like".
        
       | oytis wrote:
       | Really missing n-gate.com. It was good. Hope he's alright
        
         | bitwize wrote:
         | An internet attempts a third-rate mockery of Hackernews.
         | Hackernews pulls a "this, but unironically", earnestly
         | replicating every joke comment in the original article, right
         | down to the obligatory XKCD.
        
         | theideaofcoffee wrote:
         | Same, I occasionally go back and re-read the archive of posts
         | for laffs. The satire there is better than 95% of the flotsam
         | posted here.
        
         | goodpoint wrote:
         | I miss it too. For being "satire" it was often more insightful
         | than HN.
        
       | wkjagt wrote:
       | It's missing a comment from someone who dismisses someone else's
       | comment by starting with "Ehhhh no." It's also missing someone
       | making a funny joke and then being downvoted because HN comments
       | need to be serious contributions to the topic.
        
         | projektfu wrote:
         | Please, this isn't Reddit.
        
       | LorenDB wrote:
       | The only thing this is missing to make it modern is Walter Bright
       | plugging D every time Python, Ruby, etc. is mentioned.
       | 
       | (By the way, I have nothing against Walter. This just seemed like
       | it should have that.)
        
       | philwelch wrote:
       | My favorite part was the tangential argument about technical
       | interviews. That seems like a common tarpit around here.
        
       | cm_silva wrote:
       | So many tropes! :-D
        
       | frabjoused wrote:
       | Missing archive link.
        
       | tomger wrote:
       | I disagree
        
       | YesThatTom2 wrote:
       | Commenter: yeah, but he forgot X
       | 
       | Reply: He says X in the second paragraph. Did you even read the
       | article?
        
       | iopq wrote:
       | Humorous meta comment
        
       | sodapopcan wrote:
       | Why was this post written in English? Should re-write in Rust.
        
       | synu wrote:
       | Missing -
       | 
       | 1. I noticed a word used slightly incorrectly in the title.
       | Rather than reading it with the clear intended meaning, let's
       | take it as literally as possible to build a suitable straw man.
       | 
       | 2. Someone replying in every thread, debating everyone like it's
       | their job and accounting for half the replies in the topic.
        
       | kergonath wrote:
       | I almost upvoted some fake comments there. Is that bad? Am I
       | conditioned to see the world through an orange and grey filter,
       | letting only sarcasm and earnest pedantry through?
        
       | Scene_Cast2 wrote:
       | n-gate.com used to have more detailed (per article) HN satire.
        
       | raldi wrote:
       | "We renamed the title from The Eleven Sexiest Mistakes Stupid
       | Morons Make When Designing Flow Control Protocols -dang"
        
       | deltaseventhree wrote:
        
       | YesThatTom2 wrote:
       | The URL should be to an article from 5 years ago with the OP
       | saying that he's sure nobody has seen this before, and 15 replies
       | with links to all the times that URL was mentioned on HN in the
       | past.
        
       | cosmiccatnap wrote:
       | I'm honestly shocked that HN hasn't taken this down yet. They
       | tend to have self awareness the way I have self control around a
       | buffet.
        
       | tamaharbor wrote:
       | I like bananas.
        
       | heresie-dabord wrote:
       | As a US poster, I need all units of measure to be what the
       | Founding Fathers used and all pickup trucks to be what the
       | Founding Fathers drove.
       | 
       | As an EU poster, I won't understand the US obsession with large
       | vehicles and I will recommend bicycling instead.
       | 
       | As a programmer, I think we can improve performance if we
       | multithread, containerise, microservice, and store n-depth JSON
       | in a No-SQL database.
       | 
       | As a Python programmer, this doesn't look Pythonic. We should be
       | using pythonic Python, especially the new release that adds the
       | syntactic sugar that we've all been waiting for.
        
         | newaccount2021 wrote:
        
         | baxtr wrote:
         | I'm sad not to read anything about Rust and Kubernetes.
        
           | gnfargbl wrote:
           | As a person running a single static website, I can
           | confidently say that Kubernetes is the most overhyped
           | technology ever. After having eventually realised that my
           | tediously simple workload can be deployed effectively using a
           | short systemd unit file and an even shorter ansible script, I
           | no longer believe anyone _actually_ runs production workloads
           | on Kubernetes.
           | 
           | I will now be considering other options for the service mesh
           | that my startup clearly needs to implement in order to send
           | an occasional email newsletter.
        
           | heresie-dabord wrote:
           | My start-up has rewritten Kubernetes in Rust because Go is
           | slow and doesn't implement traits in a rustaceous way. Now we
           | have a system about which we still can't reason tractably,
           | but we can guarantee memory safety wherever memory safety can
           | be guaranteed.
        
         | glogla wrote:
         | > As a US poster, I need [...] all pickup trucks to be what the
         | Founding Fathers drove.
         | 
         | > As an EU poster, I won't understand the US obsession with
         | large vehicles and I will recommend bicycling instead.
         | 
         | I will not buy EV unless it can go 10000 miles on a single
         | charge, otherwise it is not good enough for my-once-in-a-decade
         | roadtrip.
        
           | mechanical_bear wrote:
           | I'd buy that EV...
        
         | EvanAnderson wrote:
         | > As an EU poster, I won't understand the US obsession with
         | large vehicles and I will recommend bicycling instead.
         | 
         | This will launch the inevitable nightmare of pro/anti-helmet
         | subthreads.
        
           | heresie-dabord wrote:
           | What nanny-state whiners don't understand is that helmets can
           | actually twist your neck or choke you as you're flipping in
           | the air and about to hit the pavement head-first. But it's
           | worse than that, helmets give people a false sense of
           | confidence. That's the real problem with our civilisation,
           | too much confidence that death isn't imminent at every turn.
           | Forewarned is forearmed, I always say to my shrinking
           | coworkers. Oh yeah, pry my weapon from my cold, dead fingers.
        
         | Mistletoe wrote:
         | NIMBY Keto.
        
         | PicassoCTs wrote:
         | As a(As a(As a(recursive defined class of person)))) im
         | astounded by how important perspective and caste has become for
         | some, while we are all just the same hairless monkeys
        
           | jablala wrote:
           | As a ______"____"______________, I agree.
        
         | irusensei wrote:
         | "As an EU poster, I need to remind everyone in every thread
         | that I have health care and GDPR."
        
           | baxtr wrote:
           | As an EU poster, the only thing that made a dent in the
           | digital unvisere was GDPR and that's why I need to remind
           | everyone about it constantly.
           | 
           | PS: I'm an EU poster
        
           | lol768 wrote:
           | "As an American poster, I will get really upset about the
           | idea of GDPR applying to US companies that do business with
           | EU citizens and businesses. I will also complain about other
           | EU regulations, because regulation is bad, stifles innovation
           | and we don't need it in the land of the free, unless the
           | state is California."
        
             | ithkuil wrote:
             | "as an American poster I will also get annoyed by non-
             | americans having anything to say about how our legislation
             | works and how that affects them; after if it wasn't for us
             | there wouldn't be any money around"
        
       | daniel-cussen wrote:
        
       | examplary_cable wrote:
       | Forgot the:
       | 
       | Shameless self-plug: I build X[1] and I'm trying to solve the
       | same problem as OP.
       | 
       | [1]: https://my-saas.com
        
       | IIAOPSW wrote:
       | There needs to be at least one person in the thread reminding us
       | about pg's submarine essay.
        
       | GTP wrote:
       | Thanks to this parody, I finally saw how the interface changes
       | when you're finally able to downvote :D
        
       | andybak wrote:
       | Wooooaaa! Literally just yesterday I was thinking about this and
       | considering posting a "Ask: Hn" to see if anyone remembered the
       | link.
       | 
       | Cosmic, man. Cosmic...
        
       | DanielBMarkham wrote:
       | irt "...I know this is off-topic, but does anyone know how he got
       | visual effect X on his blog? ..."
       | 
       | I cannot describe the sadness I feel when I see the title of an
       | essay I might enjoy, decide to use HN comments as a way to
       | decide, then the top comments are all "Why is he using comic sans
       | as a font? Does he hate us?" and so forth.
       | 
       | A kitten dies each time this happens.
       | 
       | Over time, I have participated less and less on HN, but I still
       | use it daily to screen out new tech news. This site rocks.
       | Excellent parody!
       | 
       | Also, for the first seventeen people to sign up for my free
       | e-book, I will purchase certificates for free rides from Uber For
       | Horses. Even if you don't like the book, think of the horses!
        
         | CRConrad wrote:
         | About that essay decision support thing: I'd say _that_
         | particular choice _is_ a pretty valid input for (i.e. against)
         | your decision.
        
       | dalmo3 wrote:
       | It's missing a thread where someone makes a very simplistic
       | analogy, followed by 300 replies discussing the analogy but not
       | the concrete point.
        
       | api wrote:
       | This is missing a tangent where someone finds a way to interject
       | a point against "woke," gets mostly downvoted into gray text, and
       | is followed by a ten level deep rehashed debate over whether free
       | speech should imply access to private platforms or not. Oh, and
       | the various dead troll replies that you can see if show dead is
       | on.
        
       | wging wrote:
       | To reveal some hidden fun stuff in the 'reply' links (because
       | hovering over everything is mildly annoying):
       | Array.from(document.querySelectorAll('a')).filter(a =>
       | a.innerText === 'reply').forEach(r => r.innerText =
       | `${r.innerText} (${r.href.replace("http://news.ycombinator.com/",
       | "")})`)
        
       | djmips wrote:
       | "Shouldn't the post add 2013 in the tile?"
       | 
       | The only way I could tell this post was old was the mention of IE
       | in the parody comments.
        
       | rvba wrote:
       | Did you win the Putnam? If not, please don't be "bolder" than
       | this guy
        
       | batch12 wrote:
       | The author forgot to use references to razors, laws, fallacies,
       | and axioms to dismiss any contentious discussion.
        
       | felipelalli wrote:
       | The Bad Humor of HN.(tm)
        
       | [deleted]
        
       | javajosh wrote:
       | I'm assuming that dang et al is going to let this thread be "The
       | Purge" for meta and self-referential comments.
       | 
       | It's once a year guys, don't let it go to waste!
        
       | chrisshroba wrote:
       | A comment praising HN and attributing its success to dang's
       | amazing moderation (which is 1000% deserved!)
        
       | theideaofcoffee wrote:
       | I don't see any posts from the Rust Evangelism Strike Force
       | (thanks, n-gate).
        
       | kretaceous wrote:
       | Some more:
       | 
       | - "I posted the same thing 3 days ago here: [link]"
       | 
       | - A person who knows the OP personally shares an anecdote
       | 
       | - "The YouTube embeds are breaking because I've disabled all
       | Google domains"
       | 
       | - Why can't you just....
       | 
       | - "Really? Long form content as a Twitter thread?"
        
       | sarlaw wrote:
       | Hack money
        
       | bazoom42 wrote:
       | Correlation !== causation
        
         | otreblatercero wrote:
         | It depends on the datatype
        
       | miles wrote:
       | Clearly fake; did not include the word "orthogonal" anywhere.
        
       | harryvederci wrote:
       | "Why did you do this with that technology instead of this
       | completely different one?"
        
       | jeremyjh wrote:
       | > Firefox nightly does
       | 
       | Somehow took this to another level for me.
        
       | abledon wrote:
       | Why can't we have more detailed technical stuff like this on HN?
        
       | [deleted]
        
       | turnsout wrote:
       | This is from 2022, needs (2022) in the title
        
         | donatj wrote:
         | A couple years back someone posted something I wrote. I'd
         | written it in November 2018 and it was currently March 2019.
         | Someone started a thread that it needed (2018) and the HN mods
         | actually made it happen - as well as changing the title.
        
       | JauntyHatAngle wrote:
       | One thing it's missing is a reply to the comment saying "have you
       | read the article" asking whether they have "read the Hacker News
       | rules" as it forbids asking if someone has read the article.
        
       | photochemsyn wrote:
       | Was this written by GPT-3?
        
       | halfmatthalfcat wrote:
       | DAE hate javascript?
        
       | PicassoCTs wrote:
       | It misses the <template> guy, posting about his life long
       | obsession in every thread, no matter how unrelated. Also no dang,
       | providing previous discussion links and stomping out flamewars
       | caused by the usual suspects.
        
       | mechanical_bear wrote:
       | Well, pack it in y'all. It's all been done.
        
       | CyborgCabbage wrote:
       | This thread reminds me of https://www.reddit.com/r/SUBREDDITNAME
        
         | kmstout wrote:
         | POST THANKING PARENT FOR LINK TO ENDLESS ENTERTAINMENT.
        
       | andrepd wrote:
       | You're missing the https://xkcd.com/1831/ guy, there's always one
       | especially when it comes to non-computer subjects like medicine
       | x)
        
       | pepy wrote:
       | relevant XKCD https://xkcd.com/386/
        
       | [deleted]
        
       | [deleted]
        
       | adg001 wrote:
       | Given the proven track record of our community, it strikes me out
       | how nobody commented about the pretty good replica of the HN's UI
       | already. Sad.
       | 
       | On a related note, I will spend all night hacking CSS to prove
       | myself I can do the same. Sleep debt does not scary me out.
        
         | nicky0 wrote:
         | I assumed they just cloned the stylesheet.
        
       | chiefalchemist wrote:
       | I wish I could, in the true spirit of NH, down vote every comment
       | I don't agree with on this tread. Unfortunately, that would
       | really count against karma. But it's tempting :)
       | 
       | That said, the parody shows nothing down voted. Is that part of
       | the parody? Or an oversight?
        
       | lumenwrites wrote:
       | Not enough nitpicky corrections that devolve into even more
       | nitpicky nerd arguments about semantics and usage of words that
       | are entirely missing the high-level picture or the ability to
       | understand the meaning of sentences based on their context.
       | 
       | Also, this could use more critical replies discussing why this
       | project couldn't possibly work, or how this article is a result
       | of living in a bubble.
       | 
       | And, of course, someone managing to steer a technical subject
       | into a divisive political argument.
       | 
       | But seriously - very fun project, I love this!
        
       | gooseus wrote:
       | Needs (2013)
       | 
       | Previous discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5326511
       | 
       | :)
        
         | [deleted]
        
       | ggregoire wrote:
       | Doesn't work on Netscape mobile.
        
       | jmugan wrote:
       | I can imagine a whole genre of these, like Madonna and Child.
        
       | unfunco wrote:
       | Is this accurate? There's not a single comment saying "x is my
       | daily driver" and no mention of anything being considered
       | harmful.
        
       | insin wrote:
       | It's missing a top-level post which makes an analogy, which turns
       | into a ten-deep thread of people arguing entirely about the
       | analogy, the friendly article having been completely forgotten.
        
         | SantalBlush wrote:
         | The analogies found on HN could have their own dedicated parody
         | site.
        
           | smugma wrote:
           | *they're
        
         | dpkirchner wrote:
         | You could power the earth exclusively on the smug that emits
         | from analogy arguments (or what we call analgruments in the
         | biz).
        
           | bstpierre wrote:
           | > You could power the earth exclusively on the smug
           | 
           | I would like to learn more about smug-powered systems. Do you
           | have some links I should read?
        
             | NavinF wrote:
             | https://smug.moe
        
         | nativecoinc wrote:
         | Hmpf, analogies are crutches. Carpenters don't use them so I
         | don't use them. Just use the right-sized hammer for the nail in
         | front of you.
        
         | vram22 wrote:
         | I posted before on HN about this trend, of commenters often
         | completely forgetting about the original article, and arguing a
         | lot (in child comments) about some top-voted comment.
         | 
         | I called it the Hacker News Right-Side Effect (or Rule)
         | 
         | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24405167
        
           | [deleted]
        
       | bsnnkv wrote:
       | Don't mind me, I'm just going to go around this parody thread
       | downvoting anyone who talks about their small bootstrapped
       | passion projects, accusing small funded companies that people
       | like of astroturfing, and then storming off in a huff when I get
       | called out. ;)
        
       | ur-whale wrote:
       | Nice, but no political comment in the entire thread, so not
       | really representative.
        
       | skc wrote:
       | All that's missing is a 200 comment thread on some
       | Microsoft/Facebook/Google tech from people who don't actually use
       | Microsoft/Facebook/Google tech
        
         | [deleted]
        
       | [deleted]
        
       | rikroots wrote:
       | > I'll weasel in a reference the startup I co-founded to my JS
       | library even though it's not directly relevant.
       | 
       | Suddenly I feel shallow, and exposed.
       | 
       | On a tangent - am I the only person who uses his real name on HN?
        
         | CRConrad wrote:
         | TAN: No.
        
       | combatentropy wrote:
       | Why is there no comment saying that someone is "conflating"
       | something or that a something is "orthogonal"?
        
         | daniel-cussen wrote:
        
       | secondcoming wrote:
       | This. I...love this
        
       | sowbug wrote:
       | If the author is here, please make each comment linkable, at
       | least via anchor tags. I'd link to them the way I sometimes link
       | to RELEVANT XKCD.
        
       | throwaway12245 wrote:
       | Flagged because it doesn't fit "the narrative".
        
       | donio wrote:
       | Not enough sophisticated adjactives. On HN everything is
       | incredible, amazing, electrifying and goosebumps inducing. I
       | would love to see a frequency analysis of such words on HN vs
       | elsewhere.
        
       | fortran77 wrote:
       | Paywalled.
        
       | sedatk wrote:
       | It's missing a top-level dang comment saying:
       | 
       | "This has been discussed before in these threads:
       | 
       | 2013 - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33680661
       | 
       | 2014 - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33680661
       | 
       | 2015 - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33680661
       | 
       | 2016 - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33680661
       | 
       | 2017 - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33680661
       | 
       | 2018 - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33680661
       | 
       | 2019 - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33680661
       | 
       | 2020 - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33680661
       | 
       | 2022 - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33680661"
        
       | rosmax_1337 wrote:
       | Damn, I was afraid this was going to be someone stealing my
       | genius idea. Gladly it was just tangential to that idea.
       | 
       | Idea: Train an ai to construct entire threads based on the input
       | of the title and link. There should be plenty of training
       | material, and frankly I think it would be hilariously similar to
       | the real threads.
       | 
       | When new submissions are added to HN, the system will fetch the
       | title and link, and predict the entire thread. You can view the
       | thread on something like hnpredicted.com/?id=33680661 . When the
       | real thread has had no new comment added for five days, it is
       | reintegrated into the system further training the model.
       | 
       | Possibly, the model could be trained on the actual content of the
       | link. But I suspect just using the short title might be better.
       | Larger concentration on the actual material there, websites
       | contain lots of text which is useless.
       | 
       | Now that I've posted the idea, feel free to steal it ofcourse.
       | It's documented that I came up with it anyway. :)
        
         | turnsout wrote:
         | I love this idea--I think it would be fun to gamify it! Keep
         | the predicted thread secret, and then use it to award points to
         | hn commenters based on originality. If a comment is
         | functionally the same as a predicted comment, it gets -10
         | points. If the comment is novel, it gets 10 points. Then
         | there's a sliding scale between.
         | 
         | You'd need some checks to prevent people from posting a bunch
         | of Zalgo text (maybe a model to identify "interesting" or
         | "insightful" posts), but it could be a fun overlay on the hn
         | commenting ecosystem.
        
         | sillysaurusx wrote:
         | Lots of us have had that idea :) we should band together and
         | make it happen.
        
         | mirekrusin wrote:
         | I present algorithm whereby each byte is iterated from 0 to
         | 255, following recursively for next byte for each previously
         | yielded result. From above nonsensical results are removed.
         | 
         | Above algorithm generalizes all human knowledge ever conceived,
         | in any format, as well as any future (duplicated!) ideas that
         | may be conceived.
         | 
         | I donate above algorithm and all its results to public domain.
         | 
         | You're welcome.
        
           | frutiger wrote:
           | > I present algorithm whereby each byte is iterated from 0 to
           | 255
           | 
           | You should've just said a stream of bits, as your system
           | cannot generate anything that requires a non-multiple of 8
           | bits to be accurately expressed. Zero padding is not the same
           | as absence of bits.
        
         | genghisjahn wrote:
         | That's what this site is. You've been talking to a machine all
         | this time. Do you really think a person would have this much
         | time to argue day in and day out over systemd? That that many
         | people care wherever or not Go has generics and which other
         | languages does them best? That rust somehow is the cure for
         | everything from game engines to the common cold? Think about
         | all the times a "person" stated something was Turing Complete
         | and how it made zero sense to you. It's been machines all this
         | time.
        
           | dmarchand90 wrote:
           | Rats, top comments will be impossible to beat. I can probably
           | piggy-back off a top comment, though, those comment threads
           | aren't long yet...
        
           | hutzlibu wrote:
           | Yeah, but at some point those machines would have had to have
           | original training data, so at some point people probably did
           | have time to engage in techno religious wars. Unless of
           | course, all of this is made up, to keep us occupied to not
           | discover the matrix or alike ..
        
           | MonkeyClub wrote:
           | Wir sind die Roboten.
        
             | pessimizer wrote:
             | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JgtFRj38fEw
        
           | narrator wrote:
           | Who could argue for hours and praise and upvote someone
           | getting Doom running on all their household appliances?
        
             | other_herbert wrote:
             | Ok that's it then it's time to run doom on my toaster,
             | rendering onto bread... input will be tough though
        
           | BoGoToTo wrote:
           | That's a really interesting idea. I think it would be fun to
           | see how well it would work in practice.
           | 
           | https://imgur.com/4UZUPec
        
         | ilyt wrote:
         | Let's go a level further. Instead of banning/shadowbanning
         | people just send it to shadow realm where all they see are bot
         | created comments and bot created answers to what they comment
        
           | dweekly wrote:
           | See also: heavenbanned
           | 
           | https://twitter.com/nearcyan/status/1532076277947330561
        
             | ilyt wrote:
             | Some video games already did something like that, except
             | instead of AI they put you in match with other offenders,
             | in sort of personal hell, then only let you out once you
             | won some matches
        
           | thorsten11 wrote:
           | Gold
        
         | sdwr wrote:
         | Can't tell if this is a parody comment or not...
        
           | wildermuthn wrote:
           | Those comments violate the HN guidelines.
           | 
           | Please read and follow them:
           | https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
           | 
           | Kidding, I too thought this thread was the parody at first.
           | After all, they are real HN comments!
           | 
           | Or maybe this is part of the parody. Maybe if we trained an
           | AI to detect genuine vs. parody?
        
             | computomatic wrote:
             | > Maybe if we trained an AI to detect genuine vs. parody?
             | 
             | Blockchain will solve this better
        
         | orf wrote:
         | I did this quite a few years ago. If I remember correctly, it
         | was so convincing that people emailed Dang because I set the
         | username at the top to be "pg"
         | 
         | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10248773
        
           | notRobot wrote:
           | Do you have your sim archived anywhere? The original seems to
           | be down.
        
             | orf wrote:
             | No, but I'm building it again. This time in rust. There's
             | some stuff on my GitHub to download data in bulk from the
             | HN API
        
         | nvader wrote:
         | > websites contain lots of text which is useless
         | 
         | I'm honestly really curious about this. Could you elaborate?
        
           | rosmax_1337 wrote:
           | Headers full of navigation. Sign up for my newsletter spam.
           | Footers. The webpage isn't just "the document we're talking
           | about", but an entire application most of the time.
        
         | yieldcrv wrote:
         | There are GPT-3 generated subreddits
         | 
         | They are pretty spot on and could do this with hackernews
        
         | AkshatJ27 wrote:
         | > Possibly, the model could be trained on the actual content of
         | the link. But I suspect just using the short title might be
         | better. Larger concentration on the actual material there,
         | websites contain lots of text which is useless.
         | 
         | Most people do not read the article before commenting, you do
         | not have to train the AI to do that.
        
         | bobleeswagger wrote:
         | There was a reddit experiment a few years back,
         | SubredditSimulator, that was a scaled version of what you
         | described. It was obviously more surreal and funny than
         | accurate. There were users trained off of popular subreddits,
         | and they just ran with threads and comments being created
         | purely from the data.
        
         | T0Bi wrote:
         | Sounds similar to /r/subredditsimulator.
         | 
         | >this is a fully-automated subreddit that generates random
         | submissions and comments using markov chains (see below for
         | more info), with each bot account creating text based on
         | comments from a different subreddit.
         | 
         | Quite fun to read.
        
           | [deleted]
        
         | btrettel wrote:
         | Someone did something similar before, but unfortunately it's
         | now offline. The HN link is still up, though:
         | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19694578
        
         | fmajid wrote:
         | I'm also surprised someone hasn't made a parody LLM-based HN
         | thread generator yet. Perhaps until recently they were too busy
         | writing crypto startup business plan generators to bilk
         | gullible VCs.
        
       | fortran77 wrote:
       | This is the type of insightful wisdom I come here for! I'm so
       | glad we're so much smarter than those Reddit people.
        
       | herendin wrote:
       | I certainly don't mean to nitpick[0], but this one is a total
       | dumpster fire because it is lacking a clear 'HN is turning into
       | Reddit!' comment[1]
       | 
       | [0]https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/ackchyually-actually-guy
       | 
       | [1]https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
        
       | JLK_121416 wrote:
       | https://web.archive.org/web/20221120140741/http://bradconte....
        
       | ClawsOnPaws wrote:
       | This whole comment section makes me happy. Thanks for that HN and
       | OP.
        
       | [deleted]
        
       | JBits wrote:
       | In all seriousness, I think people not reading the full article
       | is a recurring theme on hn.
       | 
       | For controversial topics, it's a major problem: people don't
       | establish what's actually being debated, instead
       | attacking/defended what they think I'd being debated, so the
       | conversation develops slowly as a result.
       | 
       | However, I also think it's a strength of hn, because hn has a
       | strong culture of going off topic: allowing for people with
       | related experience to share and to suggest new avenues to
       | explore. Often, instead of bookmarking the referenced article, I
       | bookmark the hn thread instead for this reason.
        
       | logicalmonster wrote:
       | A true parody of HackerNews needs the following.
       | 
       | > Be midwit
       | 
       | > Pops in at random 5 levels deep into some discussion
       | 
       | > Says that a point is "whataboutism"
       | 
       | > Takes great personal pride in thinking that he's won the debate
       | by using the vocabulary term he just learned
       | 
       | > Refuses to elaborate
       | 
       | > Leaves
        
       | tyingq wrote:
       | Didn't find orthogonal, idempotent, or a rant about correlation
       | vs causation.
        
       | fleddr wrote:
       | I don't find this parody funny at all because the site doesn't
       | work without JS plus it's taking over my scrollbar. Not at all
       | smooth in Firefox 3.11 with everything except HTML disabled.
        
       | rcarr wrote:
       | There's also this for more hacker news satire although it sadly
       | seems dormant now: http://n-gate.com
        
       | saagarjha wrote:
       | See also: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23003595
        
         | mgdlbp wrote:
         | and https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6747373
        
       | coding123 wrote:
       | You omitted the obligatory dang banning someone that had a
       | flagged comment and then 4 people asking what it said.
        
       | Thrymr wrote:
       | Didn't commit to the bit enough to register expertslastname.com.
       | Still available!
        
       | mmsimanga wrote:
       | You can do this Postgresql. Since I switched over x number of
       | years I have never looked back.
        
       | ent101 wrote:
       | forgot the obligatory archive.is link.
        
       | breck wrote:
       | This is cool (only read the first two lines so far) but if you're
       | really interested in Hacker News Parody software you should check
       | out our startup: https://zombo.com/#HACKER_NEWS_PARODY_DOT_IO
        
         | kmlx wrote:
         | i only read the first word and i completely agree with this
         | take.
        
         | nailer wrote:
         | Definitely this changes the game (I am the cofounder of the
         | author of the parent comment).
        
         | brecksAnonAccnt wrote:
         | Came hear to say this.
         | 
         | +1 for https://zombo.com/#HACKER_NEWS_PARODY_DOT_IO
        
           | throwaway892238 wrote:
           | *here
           | 
           | Back in the day nobody on HN would so egregiously misspell
           | words. This place is turning into Reddit.
        
             | [deleted]
        
             | junon wrote:
             | Not fully reddit until a bot matches /came +hear/i and
             | posts a snarky "Um Actshualleeee" comment.
        
               | [deleted]
        
       | et1337 wrote:
       | This is missing the "scrolling is broken, history is broken, text
       | isn't high contrast enough, doesn't work on mobile Safari, I hate
       | paywalls, I hate cookie pop-ups, I hate newsletter signups,
       | doesn't work with adblock, doesn't work without JavaScript, so
       | didn't read the article" comment.
        
       | Cupertino95014 wrote:
       | LOL.
       | 
       | A serious post (I know, it's hard to tell at this point, isn't
       | it?):
       | 
       | Why does HN need the karma points system _at all_? Downvoting is
       | hardly used on other social networking sites any more, which
       | should tell you something. Getting one pedantipoint has to be a
       | motivation for  "I have stuff to say about JIT." posts.
       | 
       | Blocking & muting people is quite effective on Twitter, for
       | example. The dream of a civil discourse with people disagreeing
       | politely was obsolete before the Web was invented. There are a
       | lot of accounts which _someone_ here would rather never see, so
       | why not just let those people erase them, just for their own TL?
       | 
       | Automatically downvoting anything you don't agree with is,
       | basically, "Lord of the Flies" behavior. It leads to brigading.
        
         | onionisafruit wrote:
         | HN "needs" karma points because HN has karma points and is over
         | all a good forum. Changing it at this point risks changing the
         | balance that makes HN what it is.
         | 
         | I don't block or mute people on forums where that is allowed
         | because I don't want to see a different conversation from
         | everybody else.
        
           | Cupertino95014 wrote:
           | First paragraph is not a real compelling argument: HN has it
           | because it has it. I should downvote :)
           | 
           | As for the second paragraph: to each his own. You have that
           | choice.
        
       | pellucide wrote:
       | I wish elon musk would buy them and fix it.
        
       | sligor wrote:
       | Is it really a parody ? In fact it is mostly pretty accurate and
       | that's why I love Hacker News over any other social media
        
       | netfl0 wrote:
       | I'd like to make a broader point here...
        
         | sokoloff wrote:
         | Did you even read the article?
        
       | allendoerfer wrote:
       | You do not really need parody sites. You can accomplish the same
       | using rsync and 3 lines of bash.
        
         | vram22 wrote:
         | Didn't you know that zsh has this cool feature which reduces it
         | to 1.5 lines? ohmyzsh!
        
         | compiler-guy wrote:
         | That might work for a small home parody, but it won't scale to
         | levels needed by viral parody sites.
        
       | nmeofthestate wrote:
       | Hmmm. I searched for "trains" but didn't find it.
        
       | twohaibei wrote:
       | I never laugh out loud in front of the screen. Especially in
       | public places. Almost never.
        
         | layer8 wrote:
         | "Firefox nightlys does" had me in fits.
        
           | someweirdperson wrote:
           | That's how I found out that the reply button does not work. I
           | wanted to post a link to the issue and explain how they got
           | it wrong.
        
       | donatj wrote:
       | It's missing the super well written and insightful "dead" comment
       | at the bottom of the page that I "vouch" but it never really
       | seems to do anything.
        
         | CRConrad wrote:
         | The one that you _and I_ "vouch" but it never really seems to
         | do anything.
        
       | Sniper1911 wrote:
       | nice try, but N-gate is still better
        
         | bluecatswim wrote:
         | I miss it :(
        
       | [deleted]
        
       | hutrdvnj wrote:
       | I disagree with the author. I know he's incredibly successful and
       | right about pretty much everything he's ever said, but I've had
       | some experience in this area and just finished reading through
       | some of the archives and I think his focus is wrong. I'm going to
       | ignore the technical issue and talk about the bigger picture and
       | higher level things than what was said in the blog post. If the
       | OP thinks that the process is most important, it's really about
       | end results. But if he thinks it should be about the end results
       | then he's an idiot for not thinking about the process. I'll
       | weasel in a reference the startup I co-founded even though it's
       | not directly relevant.
        
         | ordu wrote:
         | No, OP is correct.
         | 
         | * You omitted his point about hyper-anal correction.
         | 
         | * You misunderstood the meaning of a parody.
         | 
         | * Here's point of a parody you didn't account for
        
         | seydor wrote:
         | > tangential statement
         | 
         | I'm honestly really curious about this. Could you elaborate?
        
           | freddymilkovich wrote:
           | Did you even read the article?
        
           | gzer0 wrote:
           | Yes, I can elaborate, however, this information should have
           | been taught to you by the age of 2. Silly HN.
           | A tangent is simply a line that touches a non-linear curve
           | (like a circle) at only a single point. It represents an
           | equation with the relationship between the coordinates "x"
           | and "y" on a two-dimensional graph.            The tangential
           | velocity is the measurement of the speed at any point tangent
           | to a rotating wheel in a circular motion. Thus angular
           | velocity, o, is related to the tangential velocity, Vt,
           | through the formula. Tangential velocity is the component of
           | the motion along the edge of a circle measured at any
           | arbitrary point of time. As per its name, tangential velocity
           | describes the motion of an object along the edge of the
           | circle, whose direction at any given point on the circle is
           | always along the tangent to that point.
           | 
           | [1] https://me
           | 
           | [2] http://me
           | 
           | [3] localhost:8080
        
             | [deleted]
        
             | seydor wrote:
             | Real-life GPT3
        
             | majewsky wrote:
             | > localhost:8080
             | 
             | Whoa, I just checked that link, and there's some really
             | offensive stuff on there. Is flamebait like this allowed
             | around here?
        
               | [deleted]
        
       | roey2009 wrote:
       | This is a repost from 2013
       | 
       | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5326511
       | 
       | The comments there are actually funnier
        
       | cojoke wrote:
       | The feeling when self awareness blows into the forum like a
       | refreshing breeze
        
       | dkarl wrote:
       | Missing the "previous discussions" links showing it was posted in
       | 2012, 2015, 2017, 2018, and twice in 2020.
        
       | stefantalpalaru wrote:
        
       | dbuder wrote:
       | Gibberish GPT3 comment from future sock puppet
        
       | mmsimanga wrote:
       | You should just quit your job
        
       | metadat wrote:
       | Lol, click the "links"
       | 
       | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17
        
       | maydup-nem wrote:
       | I remember how I did something similar back in 1983...
        
         | heresie-dabord wrote:
         | ... _in Org Mode_ ...
        
         | bookofjoe wrote:
         | This is my favorite comment. Not even close.
        
       | zorked wrote:
       | The only thing missing is the actual expert making a clueful
       | statement at the very bottom of the page where nobody reads.
       | Possibly downvoted a couple of times.
        
         | seydor wrote:
         | Please downvote this person
        
         | turnsout wrote:
         | Queue the hn reply: "Did you actually read the article? There
         | is such a comment (guru3)."
        
           | tomalpha wrote:
           | I _hate_ to be pedantic but surely you mean "cue"?
        
             | turnsout wrote:
             | _Well actually_ in this instance I specifically wanted to
             | evoke the image of the commenter waiting in line to deliver
             | their retort.
             | 
             | jkjk
        
               | downvotetruth wrote:
               | "turnsout" You're submitting too fast. Please slow down.
               | 
               | Thanks
        
             | MonkeyClub wrote:
             | Nonsense, you don't _hate_ being pedantic :)
        
             | daniel-cussen wrote:
        
         | robswc wrote:
         | And when you click on their unsuspecting profile called
         | "jolly_rogers123" it goes:
         | 
         | >link to their site
         | 
         | >creator of (literally the thing being discussed), 2007
         | 
         | >20+ YoE in everything
        
           | breck wrote:
           | https://archive.ph/rLsBh
        
         | donio wrote:
         | To be fair that's often missing on HN too.
        
       | drdec wrote:
       | Overly critical comment focusing on some obscure technical facet
       | of the post, giving the impression of not understanding it is a
       | parody.
        
       | theCrowing wrote:
       | I don't know why you need to bring politics into this.
        
       | nailer wrote:
       | I dislike Elon Musk and also it's the apocalypse.
        
         | graderjs wrote:
         | You picked an appropriate username for your comment
        
         | synu wrote:
         | I like Elon Musk and it's actually 4D chess
        
         | rtp4me wrote:
         | lets not forget...
         | 
         | * 5-day/40hr work weeks should be abolished in favor of
         | 3-day/24hr work weeks
         | 
         | * I will never, ever work in an office again - work from
         | home/remote 100% only
         | 
         | * I will sabatoge my work place if I am forced to work on
         | nights/weekends
         | 
         | * All bosses are _ssholes_ and should never be trusted
         | 
         | * Senior leadership (CEOs, etc) should forfit all their money
         | and die if they ever lay off people
         | 
         | * People with more money than me suck
        
       | soheil wrote:
       | You don't have to continue the parody and prove that the OP is
       | right by making more parody comments. We already know he's right.
       | There has to be a word for that.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2022-11-20 23:01 UTC)