[HN Gopher] Cesium detected in the atmosphere of a hot white dwarf
___________________________________________________________________
Cesium detected in the atmosphere of a hot white dwarf
Author : wglb
Score : 55 points
Date : 2022-11-15 02:53 UTC (1 days ago)
(HTM) web link (phys.org)
(TXT) w3m dump (phys.org)
| freeqaz wrote:
| What is the significance of this finding? I see something about
| "Radiative levitation" which means nothing to me. Is the idea to
| prove that fusion is still happening in these stars somehow?
| [deleted]
| Ygg2 wrote:
| Look at wikipedia
| https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiative_levitation
|
| Essentially. Big ions capture photons better.
| Nevermark wrote:
| > The mechanism is that heavier elements have large photon
| absorption cross-sections when partially ionized (see opacity),
| so efficiently absorb photons from the radiation coming from
| the core of the star, and some of the energy of the photons
| gets converted to outward momentum, effectively 'kicking' the
| heavy atom towards the photosphere. [0]
|
| I.e. radiation pushes heavier elements to the surface,
| increasing their visibility to us much higher than their
| fraction of stellar mass
|
| [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiative_levitation
| throw1234651234 wrote:
| I read that and still don't see the significance. Admittedly,
| I am very far from the topic.
| vikingerik wrote:
| The significance is that these elements detected in a star
| don't mean they exist throughout the star, but only in the
| outer layers. So we don't need to somehow adjust theories
| of stellar evolution to explain how all that cesium got
| produced somewhere and this star got full of it. There's
| only a small amount of cesium, which fits within existing
| theories (produced from past supernovas), it's just
| unusually visible.
| AtlasBarfed wrote:
| I am not a physicist or astronomer, but I would think
| detectable levels of trans-iron isotopes would call into
| question some of the assumptions about heavy element production
| in stars. IIRC anything heavier than iron is not an exothermic
| nuclear reaction.
|
| I speculate the astronomers are trying to figure out how
| detectable amounts of a very heavy element are in the outer
| layers of the star where the emission lines can be detected.
| Later stage stars are layered by the elements produced in
| fusion.
|
| I thought that dwarfs resulted from stars lacking the
| gravitational pressure to create fusion in the core to reach
| those elements. So how did they get there at all?
|
| And if it's detectable in the halo of the star, that means
| there is enough in the lower levels (since late-stage stars are
| basically layers of each atomic number where they are fused)
| that some of it migrates to somewhere where the lines show up
| in the star's light emissions?
|
| Maybe it's just stuff left over from a previous star's
| supernova when the star formed? I can't see that resulting in
| enough that it would appear.
|
| Anyway, those are my amateurish questions.
| vikingerik wrote:
| It _is_ stuff left over from a previous star 's supernova.
| That's the only way anything heavier than iron and nickel
| gets produced. It is a small amount, but it's more visible
| than its raw proportion, because it gets suspended in the
| stellar atmosphere, because the large atoms get hit by a lot
| of radiation pressure.
|
| The point of this is that we _don 't_ need to rethink heavy
| element production (or at least not by much), because known
| processes suffice.
| martinclayton wrote:
| It's the first time this particular element has been observed
| in this context. Other trans-iron elements have been seen in
| the atmospheres of hot white dwarfs before, so not that
| surprising.
| es7 wrote:
| Is it aliens?
| Ygg2 wrote:
| It's (almost) never aliens.
| avian wrote:
| It's aliens and they are failing do de-cesify their economy.
| moffkalast wrote:
| Just a regular ol' alien nuclear waste landfill star, nothing
| to see here.
|
| _Subscribe for more fun anthropomorphic projections you can
| tell yourself_
| ksaxena wrote:
| With the barrage of Astronomy articles that have been hitting
| HN front page of late, perhaps we should start asking, "Is it
| Aliens yet?"
| hashtag-til wrote:
| Underrated comment
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2022-11-16 23:02 UTC)