[HN Gopher] The rabbit hole of adding grain to digital photos
___________________________________________________________________
The rabbit hole of adding grain to digital photos
Author : giuliomagnifico
Score : 17 points
Date : 2022-11-13 12:58 UTC (10 hours ago)
(HTM) web link (vmoldo.com)
(TXT) w3m dump (vmoldo.com)
| jug wrote:
| Thankfully, as for mobile apps, there are some authentic looking
| ones out there handling both dust and grain as well as filters
| based on film stock scans such as RNI Films. :) No affiliation;
| it's just among the best value out there that I've found.
|
| For computers and Lightroom/Photoshop you have stuff like
| Replichrone to help.
| desro wrote:
| Interesting. Definitely a challenge if accurate emulation of film
| stock is desired.
|
| I almost always add a subtle amount of "grain" with LR when
| developing photos. It looks pleasant and seems to add a sense of
| coherency to an image. I find that in many cases where details
| are lost to aggressive NR or otherwise simply not present, grain
| can make it easier to "see" the missing detail... as with most
| things, the optimal amount of noise is not zero.
| ISL wrote:
| If adding grain seems like a strange thing to do, consider it as
| a way to signal to the eye, "This is the smallest scale on which
| there is any information, you'll have to infer anything smaller."
| I rarely add grain to images, but when I do, it can sometimes
| give a more-organic and hence perceptually-real feeling.
|
| There are image-software companies whose specialties include
| careful emulation of grain. I don't use them, but plugins like
| https://nikcollection.dxo.com/silver-efex-pro/ are intended for
| that very purpose.
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2022-11-13 23:00 UTC)