[HN Gopher] Writing down what I do in Obsidian
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Writing down what I do in Obsidian
        
       Author : larve
       Score  : 329 points
       Date   : 2022-11-09 03:42 UTC (19 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (v5.chriskrycho.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (v5.chriskrycho.com)
        
       | prithsr wrote:
       | I know this thread seems to be Obsidian specific, but wanted to
       | share: I've been writing down every detail of my day since
       | January 2021 on Diarly. I pay $15 a year to have it sync across
       | iCloud devices. I have two "journals" - one for personal, and one
       | for work. From thoughts, to encounters during the day, to what
       | food I ate, I write everything. It has dramatically improved my
       | day-to-day. I've had trouble remembering my whole life, and now I
       | can just look back and find the exact date where I did something
       | (the search feature is pretty spot on). It's even improved my
       | retention skills - e.g. "i don't remember what day this happened,
       | but I am positive xyz happened because I remember writing about
       | it". Strongly strongly recommend it to all.
        
         | belmont_sup wrote:
         | I do this too for the past 12 years on DayOne! What started off
         | as a "why am I doing this" first entry has now become an almost
         | daily thought splurge.
         | 
         | It's great for myself that always forget the little, prized
         | memories too.
        
         | buzzy_hacker wrote:
         | Do you do this at the end of the day or throughout the day?
        
           | tarentel wrote:
           | Not the op but I keep a record of my work day. I try to do it
           | as it happens but 50% of the time things come up so I'll
           | usually spend some time before signing off to try to capture
           | everything.
        
         | chriskrycho wrote:
         | Yes, and when combined with search (including just grep/rg/etc.
         | on the command line!) it becomes really, really powerful. It's
         | hard to _explain_ just how powerful, because it 's the kind of
         | thing that, like compounding interest, really only shows up as
         | you continue investing over time, but it really pays huge
         | dividends.
        
         | pkoird wrote:
         | The major thing that people overlook in note-taking is "habit".
         | Doesn't matter if you use Notepad, Obsidian or just plain
         | pen&paper, the single most thing that matters is that you do it
         | consistently. And like you said, consistent note-taking is a
         | great cognitive exercise and has long term benefits.
        
           | runevault wrote:
           | I'd say it depends a lot on why. Tools like
           | Obsidian/Notion/etc making it easier to crosslink things has
           | value depending on how you use it. But a taken note is still
           | better than no note even if just for the mental exercise I
           | agree.
        
         | rchaud wrote:
         | Diarly seems like a nice tool, and very affordable.
         | 
         | Unfortunately it's Mac/iOS only. I have a Mac but zero interest
         | in using iOS.
        
         | ZetaZero wrote:
         | > I pay $15 a year to have it sync across iCloud devices.
         | 
         | Curious how you do this? The Obsidian Sync option is $96/year.
        
           | dexterdog wrote:
           | He's not using Obsidian. I use Obsidian with syncthing (not
           | really an iOS option) so I pay nothing.
        
           | bojo wrote:
           | Obsidian has their own sync platform independent of the rest.
           | Diarly's $15/yr covers a handful of premium options, one of
           | which is iCloud sync.
        
           | darrmit wrote:
           | Obsidian works perfectly fine with iCloud Drive if you're
           | bought into the Apple ecosystem. It also works well with
           | Google Drive, but that doesn't play well with iOS.
        
           | krimpenrik wrote:
           | I use obsidian with Synthing works like a charm sync it to my
           | phone and laptop and to my server where it gets backed up
        
       | jatins wrote:
       | no shade, but just reading this I was sure this was written by
       | someone who works in BigTech. Because this was very reminiscent
       | of ceremony required for BigTech performance reviews.
        
         | JonChesterfield wrote:
         | In fairness this is probably an answer to "how to pass
         | promotion" in such an environment. I don't have the patience so
         | will stay with git log immediately before the deadline but have
         | some envy for people who enjoy this sort of logging.
        
         | googlryas wrote:
         | Yes, I thought it sounded like snippets for my OKRs. Could also
         | be derived from quantified self lineage.
        
           | wingerlang wrote:
           | I think it is more the latter. Seems more like a passion (or
           | obsession) than something they have to do for OKRs,
           | especially with the super detailed logging and using
           | dedicated apps, and super optimizing them on top of that.
        
             | taubek wrote:
             | I keep similar list so that when I we have quarterly/yearly
             | reviews I can recall what was I doing few months ago.
        
         | _glass wrote:
         | I am blushing, because I have org mode open with my OKRs nicely
         | tree-structured, and open tasks underneath. And, and, I giant
         | mess of real-world task on top, that I don't know how to
         | structure, but are somehow part of my job.
        
         | chriskrycho wrote:
         | It happens to be the case that I _do_ (I am at LinkedIn) but I
         | actually started this years ago when I was working as an
         | independent contractor /consultant. It was the only way I could
         | keep track of having many, many different things in flight: I
         | was working on a masters' degree, working ~full time, had two
         | little kids, and also had several side projects going. It
         | actually started out as just a way to help build the necessary
         | personal disciplines to _get things done_ , and the logging
         | grew out of it when I realized it was really helpful for two
         | things: my own understanding of what I had done over a given
         | period of time, and then _eventually_ for using at the startup
         | I joined in 2016, and now at BigTech.
        
       | craneoscopia wrote:
       | I finally settled into:
       | 
       | - text files (edited with vim using vimwiki format ie. adding ```
       | %% vim: set ft=vimwiki ``` to the file
       | 
       | - syncthing (@ mobile, desktop and server)
       | 
       | - Markor (@ mobile)
        
       | ynab4 wrote:
       | No. You're not going to charge me for taking notes.
        
         | raesene9 wrote:
         | Obsidian is free though. Even for syncing it's totally possible
         | to do that wit just git (which is what I do)
        
           | callahad wrote:
           | Only for personal use. If you're using it at work, you're
           | supposed to purchase a license. https://obsidian.md/eula
           | 
           | > You need to pay for Obsidian if and only if you use it to
           | contribute, directly or indirectly, to revenue-generating,
           | work-related activities in a company that has two or more
           | people.
        
             | raesene9 wrote:
             | That's not exactly how I'd read that EULA. To me it's
             | asking for payment if you use it _for_ work not _at_ work.
             | so someone recording personal notes on a work system wouldn
             | 't fall into that category, but someone using it for
             | product development at their company would...
        
               | benhurmarcel wrote:
               | If what you're writing is related to your professional
               | activity, you're supposed to pay. So for example if you
               | use it (as the article suggests) to record your work
               | achievements at your job, you're supposed to buy a
               | license.
        
               | callahad wrote:
               | Hm. Yeah, I guess it's not as clear-cut. The Commercial
               | License docs are maybe a bit more explicit? https://help.
               | obsidian.md/Licenses+%26+Payment/Commercial+lic...
               | 
               | > _If your notes contain content directly related to work
               | projects or processes for a greater-than-one-person
               | company, then you require a commercial license._
               | 
               | (This is from Q13 on that page, "I use Obsidian to store
               | all of my knowledge, both personal and professional,
               | because it's difficult to separate them. Do I need a
               | commercial license?")
        
               | raesene9 wrote:
               | ah that's an interesting clarification! They should
               | really give that more prominence as I'd guess there'll be
               | quite a few people with that use-case.
        
       | deliriumchn wrote:
       | I honestly tried to love obsidian because of how easy it is to
       | set up and how user friendly the UI is (plus there are tutorials
       | and tons of articles), but I just can't get over it being offline
       | and only means to sync are looking for a plugin that will use
       | git/dropbox etc plus there are no mobile app anyways.
       | 
       | Right now I found that notion is perfect for me. It does not have
       | a mind mapping functionality but its very good, super easy to use
       | (to the point it being intuitive) in all other areas AND I have
       | perfect sync, mobile app and web app so I can use it on my work
       | laptop, phone and personal PC without any problems
       | 
       | But if you don't need that, obsidian is amazing
        
         | zinfour wrote:
         | I don't know when you tried obsidian but it does have a mobile
         | app and a (paid) sync/backup service.
        
         | jsty wrote:
         | I'm slightly confused - Obsidian has mobile apps [0] and sync
         | functionality is built in [1]
         | 
         | [0] https://obsidian.md/mobile
         | 
         | [1] https://obsidian.md/sync
        
         | crimsoneer wrote:
         | Honestly, it's worth paying for Obsidian sync. Sure, you can
         | try and do some git/dropbox style combo, but Obsidian Sync is
         | proper magical along with the mobile app.
        
         | raesene9 wrote:
         | FWIW I use Obsidian, and just a private GitHub account and git
         | for syncing, it works well no costs, I just need to remember to
         | use git :)
        
           | pwillia7 wrote:
           | webhook?
        
             | raesene9 wrote:
             | yeah I could likely automate it if needed but generally I'm
             | ok with manual sync for now.
        
       | ThePhantom wrote:
       | I can see Obsidian being popular because it makes notetaking fun
       | and customizable and may motivate people to do it more. But as
       | far as actual productivity goes I can't see any benefit it adds.
        
         | scottbruin wrote:
         | That's kind of like saying an IDE has no clear productivity
         | benefit when authoring software. It's an IDE for note-taking.
        
           | ThePhantom wrote:
           | When I think of productivity in this context, I am referring
           | to the rate at which one can generate value.
           | 
           | Software itself has value (eg, a client-facing web service).
           | Therefore an IDE, which may require an investment to get past
           | the learning curve, can have a productivity benefit as it can
           | make generating software (and thus value) more efficient.
           | 
           | Do notes themselves have value? I would argue not really. For
           | the most part things like "life planners" / "task managers"
           | I've noticed are highly intricate but require considerable
           | upkeep to maintain. Time that can be used to actually
           | generate value.
        
             | beaker52 wrote:
             | Does the software itself have value? Isn't it what people
             | do with the software that really has value? The software
             | sat on a floppy disk has pretty low value.
             | 
             | I'd then argue that software has as much value as notes do.
             | It's about what you do with it/them, what it/they enable -
             | that counts.
             | 
             | But both software and notes are therefore extremely
             | valuable to the activity of doing.
             | 
             | My notes are my software, heck I even call my note system
             | "LifeOS", which makes that even more apparent.
        
             | timrichard wrote:
             | Incredibly valuable for me. When exploring something new, I
             | journal as I go. If a side task has to be parked, I can
             | pick up again months later because I use it as a
             | knowledgebase. Also, a quick scan for #gotcha in my notes
             | reminds me of subtle bugs and workarounds in tools and
             | processes that are easily forgotten. I also create quick
             | reference charts for tools I want to become familiar. I
             | hashtag every new note as if I'm making a Twitter post, so
             | things are linked in a useful way. I usually have Obsidian
             | open near the IDE.
        
         | Cthulhu_ wrote:
         | You've kinda addressed your own concern about productivity
         | though - it's more fun.
        
       | [deleted]
        
       | happy2code wrote:
       | I'm using `vimwiki` for years and love it.
       | 
       | I also tried Obsidian but I need it also mobile and I cannot
       | define a storage path for my files.
       | 
       | I just like the freedom, minimalism and flexibility of vimwiki.
        
         | petepete wrote:
         | I tried vimwiki for a while but I found I used a tiny subset of
         | its functionality and couldn't get it to respect my choice of
         | syntax highlighting for markdown. It set me off in the right
         | direction though.
         | 
         | The fact that it's _just_ a directory full of markdown files
         | allowed me to easily migrate to my own home-grown setup that
         | reimplements the three keybindings I actually used.
         | 
         | https://github.com/peteryates/dotfiles/blob/master/nvim/.con...
        
         | codethief wrote:
         | > I cannot define a storage path for my files
         | 
         | I agree that this is _very_ annoying but couldn 't you still
         | configure e.g. Syncthing (or FolderSync) to sync things
         | correctly?
        
         | sva_ wrote:
         | There's a community plugin called "Remotely Save"[0], which
         | allows you to sync your data on s3-like services. I use this
         | with Backlaze's 10gb free plan.
         | 
         | It took a minute to set up but runs without any issues for me.
         | 
         | [0] https://github.com/remotely-save/remotely-save
        
         | JonChesterfield wrote:
         | Android's client lets you specify the location of the vault, in
         | which all files/folders are placed.
        
       | _bramses wrote:
       | > Update the link to the weekly note. (I can definitely use a
       | templating plugin to make this happen automatically, but haven't
       | spent the time on that yet.)
       | 
       | Here ya go! (Requires Templater plug-in)
       | 
       | ``` Week: [[<% tp.date.now('yyyy') %>-W<% tp.date.now('ww') %>]]
       | ```
        
         | chriskrycho wrote:
         | HEYO the internet did my work for me! Thanks!
        
       | tfsh wrote:
       | There's a useful plugin called "Daily Notes" which automatically
       | creates a note each day with your desired template, along with
       | the calendar plugin I have a daily chronology of everything I've
       | done which I deem noteworthy.
       | 
       | If anyones interested in Obsidian and daily journalling keep the
       | initial ceremony low. Some people have sections for challenges,
       | achievements, mood, emails, to-dos, etc. That'll be far too much
       | cognitive load for anyone - keep it simple and very quickly
       | you'll know whether you want to add or remove any of the daily
       | ceremony.
       | 
       | I have a "Key tasks" where I include a mostly succinct breakdown
       | of anything worth noting. I did this on Google Docs for 3 years
       | before very recently moving to Obsidian and I wouldn't turn back.
       | Tags and back links definitely help me jump between related
       | thoughts and actions much more than grepping in a 50k+ words
       | Google doc :)
        
         | noneeeed wrote:
         | It works well with the calendar plugin too. You click on a
         | future date and it will create the daily not for that day so
         | you can pop something in as a future reminder.
         | 
         | I've only been using Obsidian for a week but it's been a
         | complete game changer for how I work.
        
         | inferense wrote:
         | this is great. For those who have a similar workflow we've
         | built a tool[1] around daily documents which on provides full
         | fledged tasks and calendar that can be synced with Gcal or any
         | other calendar via .ics.
         | 
         | [1] https://acreom.com
        
         | rpastuszak wrote:
         | I've just transitioned from Apple Notes to Obsidian and so far
         | I'm loving it. In terms of high quality free software (not nec.
         | OSS) it feels like the same league as Blender. It's so simple
         | and so powerful.
         | 
         | I use it for ad hoc notes and research (e.g. project ideas, an
         | ML-course I'm taking now, random interesting subjects beyond
         | tech) as well as for daily journaling.
         | 
         | I start my day by writing in a "stream of consciousness" app I
         | wrote for myself: https://enso.sonnet.io.
         | 
         | The format is as follows (ca. 20m each morning, 700-800 words):
         | 
         | - 100% unstructured description of my previous day, then
         | 
         | - 3-4 things I found beautiful or interesting, then
         | 
         | - a short TODO list for the day.
         | 
         | Then I just copy past the notes into my new daily note in
         | Obsidian.
         | 
         | This seems to work really well for me. If I was to pick one
         | improvement, it would be Apple Reminders treating multi-line
         | text as separate entries when pasting. But again, it takes just
         | a few seconds, and most of my workflow is just muscle memory at
         | this stage.
         | 
         | PS. I'm thinking about writing an Open AI Whisper powered
         | transcription tool for voice notes in Obsidian. If that's
         | something you'd find useful and would be prepared to pay for,
         | please let me know.
        
           | callistus wrote:
           | > https://enso.sonnet.io
           | 
           | Thanks for sharing this. Love the constraints and how minimal
           | it is.
        
           | erreJulian wrote:
           | Enso looks great, thank you for sharing.
        
             | [deleted]
        
           | 0x008 wrote:
           | Its not the same - I know, but you can try these options to
           | get a similar experience in obsidian:
           | 
           | - https://forum.obsidian.md/t/zen-focus-mode-with-
           | automation/3... - https://github.com/deathau/cm-typewriter-
           | scroll-obsidian with Zen-Mode enabled.
        
           | tuvi13 wrote:
           | I am going to use that serene enso thingy you built :-)
        
         | stefandesu wrote:
         | There's also the "Periodic Notes" plugin which additionally
         | allows for weekly, monthly, quarterly, and yearly notes.
        
           | a10c wrote:
           | Which integrates nicely with the Calendar plugin (you can
           | click the week view to create a weekly note directly in the
           | calendar)
        
             | stefandesu wrote:
             | True, forgot to mention that, that's how I use it as well.
             | I use it for my journal and it works very well for me.
        
         | fatfox wrote:
         | If anyone is looking for the "Daily Notes" plugin in Obsidian:
         | You can enable it under "Core plugins".
        
         | nagarjun wrote:
         | I use an iOS Shortcut to create a daily note in Bear. It's
         | simple but, works surprisingly well!
        
         | aliqot wrote:
         | I use this every day :)
        
         | crucialfelix wrote:
         | I also use Memos which is a plugin for quick capture, short
         | status updates. It inserts them in your Daily Notes page. Also
         | can view and search all memos collected across all day pages.
        
         | SystemOut wrote:
         | Try the "Checklist" plugin. You can put a #todo tag above a
         | section in your note and it will aggregate all your checklist
         | items under that tag into the sidebar. It lets me put todos
         | across all my notes and keep track of them.
        
       | laputan_machine wrote:
       | Does anyone have any experience with Joplin[0] as an alternative?
       | I'm looking into using SyncThing + Joplin to create a sort of
       | 'networked personal brain'. I was originally looking at Obsidian,
       | but the arguments on why they chose not to go FOSS are pretty
       | weak[2] imo, so I'm looking at using Joplin instead.
       | 
       | [0] https://github.com/laurent22/joplin/
       | 
       | [1] https://syncthing.net/
       | 
       | [2] https://obsidian.rocks/why-isnt-obsidian-open-source/
        
         | eitland wrote:
         | I used Joplin for some time. It is really good and it has been
         | very stable.
         | 
         | Using Joplin Web Clipper from Firefox I could also snip pages
         | (or parts of pages) into Joplin.
         | 
         | But the most amazing thing is that
         | 
         | - it works on mobile devices as well.
         | 
         | - No lock in: it syncs flawlessly (AFAIK) over WebDAV so I can
         | sync all my data using a really inexpensive Hetzner instance.
         | 
         | Personally I happily used it for a long time but always felt
         | something was missing and never felt completely at home with
         | it.
         | 
         | So now I use Logseq which is a little rough around the edges
         | but which I, for now at least feel very at home with.
        
           | srcreigh wrote:
           | Can you describe the things you like about Logseq at the
           | moment?
        
         | krimpenrik wrote:
         | I used Joplin for some years, really stable and worked well. I
         | used nextcloud with webdev to sync.
         | 
         | Switched over to obsidian couple months ago and am in love,
         | such a great piece of software.
         | 
         | I love the excalidraw integration, game changer
        
         | _def wrote:
         | I use Joplin and sync it with Dropbox, because after loosing my
         | notes too many times I don't want to be responsible for hosting
         | them anymore. Joplin works and syncs good enough across all
         | devices I use (Linux, Windows, Android).
        
         | qbasic_forever wrote:
         | IIRC Joplin stores notes in a SQLite DB which is a huge no-no
         | to sync with syncthing. Even the syncthing devs warn against
         | syncing SQLite databases. It will seem to work fine until two
         | machines write to the database independently (perhaps each is
         | offline) and then their changes can't be reconciled by
         | syncthing and data is lost or conflicted.
        
           | alexktz wrote:
           | Notes in Joplin are stored plain text with obfuscated
           | filenames. The only time joplin uses a DB is for indexing.
        
         | robviren wrote:
         | I have used syncthing + marktext[0] and or ghostwriter[1]
         | depending on the content of my notes. For a daily journal I
         | like to use ghostwriter as it has almost no distraction and it
         | forces me to focus. It just got shifted over to being
         | maintained by the KDE team and I really enjoy it.
         | 
         | I liked marktext over joplin for similar reasons. But I am
         | probably a little overzealous in my search for distraction free
         | note taking. I assume joplin provides more feature sets, I just
         | happened to want less features for what I do on a day to day.
         | 
         | [0]https://github.com/marktext/marktext
         | [1]https://github.com/KDE/ghostwriter
        
         | alin23 wrote:
         | I'm using Syncthing with NotePlan and Caddy in a similar way,
         | it should be doable as long as Joplin can sure individual
         | files.
         | 
         | Here's how I do it:
         | https://notes.alinpanaitiu.com/How%20I%20write%20this%20blog...
         | 
         | If you want to sync an SQLite DB of articles instead, you can
         | also do that with Litestream: https://litestream.io
        
         | tluyben2 wrote:
         | I use Joplin with the personal server; I migrated my notes away
         | from Evernote and Notion to Joplin for my personal use. I
         | really like it; it is fast, open source, simple plugin system
         | and very stable (something I cannot say of notion or Evernote).
        
         | throwaway675309 wrote:
         | If I remember correctly Joplin doesn't like you to keep your
         | own file structure for your markdown notes, it has some kind of
         | a alphanumeric representation which obfuscates the original
         | structure.
        
         | tristanbvk wrote:
         | I used Syncthing and Joplin on both desktop ans Android and it
         | worked very well.
        
         | graeber_28927 wrote:
         | Joplin as a markdown note taking app was my gateway drug to
         | Obsidian.
         | 
         | I used to sync Joplin to just my Dropbox, and it worked well
         | for free on all my devices.
         | 
         | Once (and only once) I had a conflict, which from then on I was
         | nervous to get again And I never really liked how top level
         | folders are notes as well, somehow I found that strange.
         | 
         | Obsidian saves markdown files, I use git so I can solve merge
         | conflicts myself, and see the version history, albeit at the
         | price of having to save and sync manually (Ctrl+Shift+C for
         | commit, Ctrl+Shift+P to push, cause I'd rather do that than
         | have it autopush at intervals). I like the UI more too, only I
         | haven't set up Obsidian on my phone yet, but it's possible
         | theoretically.
         | 
         | Tldr: Setup is more hassle, but I migrated my notes (manually)
         | and like the UI, layout, search and git integration better.
         | Joplin was definitely easier to get running for free, and I can
         | easily recommend it to anyone. It's just where I am now,
         | exploring and liking something new, seeing if it sticks.
        
         | theshrike79 wrote:
         | I used to use Joplin, but I prefer the Obsidian way where all
         | my documents are just markdown in a directory structure.
         | 
         | The plugin ecosystem seems more viable too, not that I'm using
         | that many.
        
         | master-12 wrote:
         | Doesn't Joplin store all notes in a SQLite DB?
         | 
         | I'd recommend looking into Logseq[0], it's free and open source
         | and stores all notes on disk as Markdown. I version my notes
         | with Git, but Syncthing will also work.
         | 
         | [0] https://logseq.com/
        
           | alexktz wrote:
           | No, Joplin stores files as plain text with obfuscated
           | filenames. An SQLite DB is only involved for indexing and
           | search.
        
           | wartijn_ wrote:
           | It does, but if you use the build in synchronization, your
           | notes will by synchronized as (optionally encrypted) files. I
           | think using syncthing would be possible if you make Joplin
           | synchronize to a local directory, and use syncthing to sync
           | that directory.
        
           | hookey wrote:
           | I used to use Logseq with Syncthing, but I ran into a bunch
           | of sync conflicts that were annoying to deal with and
           | sometimes it would just stop syncing for no reason. Luckily,
           | they've just made Logseq Sync available to all backers on
           | OpenCollective and it works quite well. I'm very happy with
           | the setup now. I think they're making Sync available as a
           | paid monthly service soon.
        
         | rroot wrote:
         | My only two frustrations with otherwise brilliant Joplin is the
         | sync and (lack of encryption).
         | 
         |  _Encryption:_ data isn 't encrypted at rest. The author seems
         | to be quite dismissive of the idea:
         | https://github.com/laurent22/joplin/issues/289
         | 
         | But then it's advertised as "end-to-end encryption" but that
         | only refers to data being encrypted while it sits on a sync
         | point. Perhaps within the definition of end-to-end, but might
         | give people the idea that the data is encrypted from the time
         | they enter it.
         | 
         |  _Sync:_ I set it to up sync so S3 so I could have mobile and
         | desktop notes in sync.
         | 
         | If I create or edit a quick note, it doesn't get synced
         | automatically! I've set the S3 sync to 5 minutes (the minimum),
         | but you have to press sync after edit.
         | 
         | Last time I looked they were working on a server sync (instead
         | of S3), so hopefully this gets fixed.
        
           | kal87 wrote:
           | Joplin's own sync service [1] works seamlessly for me. The
           | basic plan is enough for my needs and is way cheaper than
           | obsidian's sync subscription.
           | 
           | [1] https://joplinapp.org/plans/
        
             | rroot wrote:
             | That's good news. Does the app sync on exit?
        
               | linuxdaemon wrote:
               | I thought "yes", but just tested and turns out it's more
               | like "kinda". It doesn't do a full sync on shutdown, but
               | if something is modified it sends a sync push , and that
               | change will get picked up after a few seconds. So if you
               | have a note that you modify, and then allow a few
               | seconds, and then close...That modification will show up
               | on other devices outside of a full sync.
               | 
               | But you can't open joplin, create a note, and then
               | immediately exit and expect the note to show up on other
               | devices. It will still exist on the device it was created
               | on, so it's not lost, it just hasn't synced yet. It will
               | automatically sync the next time you start joplin though.
               | 
               | In my case, I use the vim key bindings, and am so
               | accustomed to hitting "<esc>:w" (which does perform a
               | sync) when I'm finished writing the note, I never
               | noticed.
        
           | TeMPOraL wrote:
           | > _Encryption: data isn 't encrypted at rest. The author
           | seems to be quite dismissive of the idea:
           | https://github.com/laurent22/joplin/issues/289_
           | 
           | Skimming the thread, the author does have a good point: this
           | is something that _should_ be handled on the OS level,
           | ideally in a transparent way on top of the filesystem. It
           | makes no sense for every app to be handling securing
           | documents on their own. Perhaps we 'll get there one of these
           | days.
        
             | Aeolun wrote:
             | The OS does do this when you have FDE enabled right?
        
               | TeMPOraL wrote:
               | Yes, but - as comments bring up - that's an orthogonal
               | issue. The thing here is that the owner of the machine in
               | many cases isn't the same as the owner of the documents -
               | think notes on a family-shared PC, or NGO-provided
               | laptop, etc. Relatedly, there are _degrees_ to protection
               | - the person you want to protect your notes from may be
               | the person you 're otherwise willing to grant access to
               | rest of the computer, etc.
               | 
               | What I think should be built into the OS is the ability
               | to secure[0] specific files, or groups of files, on top
               | of FDE. Think, "right click -> Password Protect" to set
               | up, and then when an application tries to access the
               | file, you're prompted for a password. Or, you mount the
               | secured folder as a drive, TrueCrypt-style. I.e.
               | document-level protection controlled by user.
               | 
               | ----
               | 
               | [0] - I originally wrote "encrypt", but perhaps OS
               | preventing access is enough in this context if FDE is
               | also enabled.
        
         | stvrsxz wrote:
         | I am using Joplin for years and I am pretty satisfied with it.
         | (This is not a comparison because I have never used Obsidian)
         | 
         | It is doing 99% of what I ever wanted to do with my knowledge
         | base. Though, if I am in a hurry and I want to quickly write
         | something down (like a quick todo or something), then I am
         | still using google keep, because editing markdown in the Joplin
         | mobile app and waiting for it to sync, it is ok but not as
         | quick as google keep. (I will not be surprised if there is a
         | solution to this and I am doing something wrong)
         | 
         | Sure. There are plenty of alternatives, and being open source
         | has its negative and positive things.
         | 
         | Self host is a good alternative if you want to play some and
         | want to own your data 100% and I have tried to self-host
         | Nextcloud on a Raspberry Pi once, but I gave up after some
         | troubleshooting when I found that Hetzner offers ready-made
         | Nextcloud boxes with https and all. I then synchronize my
         | encrypted notes through Nextcloud pretty easily. I have never
         | tried the Joplin cloud solution that was created after I chose
         | Nextcloud (as an alternative also to Dropbox).
        
         | zeruch wrote:
         | I used Joplin for about a year, then switched to Obsidian.
         | Joplin is/was good (and on mobile was nice and responsive) but
         | Obsidian just (so far) has been a better overall fit.
        
         | number6 wrote:
         | I use a syncthing setup with logseq which is FOSS but is also
         | opinionated. Could be something you could use
        
         | wartijn_ wrote:
         | You can create a template for your daily/weekly..etc notes via
         | the templates plugin[0]. And I don't use them myself, but it
         | looks like there are plugins for automatic backlinks[1] and
         | embedding other notes[2] as well
         | 
         | [0] https://github.com/joplin/plugin-templates
         | 
         | [1] https://discourse.joplinapp.org/t/automatic-backlinks-
         | with-m...
         | 
         | [2] https://github.com/ylc395/joplin-plugin-note-link-system
        
         | stavros wrote:
         | I use Joplin and like it a lot. I wrote some tooling to
         | generate a static site out of my public notes:
         | 
         | https://notes.stavros.io/
        
         | e-brake wrote:
         | Switched from OneNote to Joplin. It's been a good replacement
         | for organizing notes & code snippets. A couple quirks. Had to
         | write custom CSS in the config to get markdown previews scaled
         | correctly. Formatting has been a nuisance, having to
         | [shift]+enter to not have double lines in preview mode, which
         | seems to break basic formatting around it on reload. Otherwise
         | no complaints, it's free, encrypted, lots of plugins, a great
         | client, and has built in support to sync directly to OneDrive.
         | Better than the janky, slow to load web client of OneNote on
         | Linux!
        
       | emptyparadise wrote:
       | Personally my Obsidian notes are a reflection of the chaos in my
       | head. The neurons (notes) of my second brain all interconnect
       | without rhyme or reason or folders or tagging...
        
         | oxff wrote:
         | This is imo how most people should start and use it. All these
         | "structure first" approaches are like using someone else's
         | preferred way of learning and memorizing, if it works its an
         | happy accident.
         | 
         | You'll get your structure out of your mind once you learn to
         | know it.
        
           | Sakos wrote:
           | Articles like this are useful to see what's possible. You
           | don't have to copy his workflow 1:1, you can take ideas from
           | many places and design a workflow that works for you.
           | 
           | Guaranteed the author didn't start "structure first". It's
           | something that developed into its current form over a long
           | time of experimenting and refinement.
        
           | manbash wrote:
           | I am constantly finding myself deliberating whether I should
           | or shouldn't use folders in my Obsidian vault.
           | 
           | Most of the times folders feel artificial. I prefer tags
           | nowadays as the single source.
           | 
           | The times I separate to a folder is for very-specific
           | Dataview data-only pages, and for storing assets such as
           | images.
        
             | oxff wrote:
             | I legitimately forgot to even consider folders once I had
             | taken "enough" notes / diary entries. Just forgot they
             | exist at all. I see everything relevant in the linked /
             | unlinked mentions that I use to refresh the context.
             | 
             | Tags I barely use, except for things I can't put into
             | "atomic notes". Like when someone mentions a book and 1-3
             | sentence review, I add it to today's diary entry and use
             | #book tag on it.
        
             | vbezhenar wrote:
             | I don't understand the concept of using tags or even
             | avoiding them.
             | 
             | Everything in my brain is highly categorized and those
             | categories are hierarchical.
             | 
             | Computer / Kubernetes / Helm / Something.md
             | 
             | Computer / Java / JVM / Garbage Collection Tuning.md
             | 
             | Construction / Foundation / Shallow Strip Foundation.md
             | 
             | Hobby / 3D Printing / On Shape.md
             | 
             | And so on.
             | 
             | I don't even think that I need links. May be some. What I
             | need is the ability to show multiple files at once. For
             | example show all files in Computer / Kubernetes / Helm
             | directory, separated with horizontal lines with the ability
             | to edit this in one editor window. I hate when I need to
             | constantly switch around in traditional editors.
        
               | leogout wrote:
               | That is very true to me as well, in my head things are
               | organized in a hierarchy of concepts. The nice thing
               | about tags is that it allows you to store a note below
               | multiple tags like in my case a note about something I
               | did with Python at work, tagged with #work,
               | #work/project_name but also with #python.
               | 
               | I use a plugin called Tag Wrangler to show my tags as a
               | tree like folders (it interprets the "/" as a parent
               | directory).
               | 
               | This allows me to keep a note below multiple tags which I
               | think is useful, at least for my own usecase.
        
               | oxff wrote:
               | Where / how do you save a HN shitpost that is definitely
               | not worthy to be part of the atomic note of
               | `Kubernetes.md`, but is still relevant / insightful and
               | related to it?
               | 
               | I would add it to either quotes.md or the daily note with
               | #kubernetes tag.
        
             | edelans wrote:
             | same here. I've been using obsidian for more than a year
             | now, and my notes are highly categorized in a structured
             | hierarchy. But I regularly feel this is not optimal
             | (sometime a note could fall into 2 different branches of my
             | hierarchy), and I can feel the friction it creates when I
             | want to add a note but I first have to think where to put
             | it.
             | 
             | So for people not leveraging folders, do you just create
             | all the notes in the same folder ? (resulting on a folder
             | with thousands of notes ? and then what's your process to
             | add a new note ? do a search, see if there currently is a
             | relevant note to ammend, if not create a new one ?
        
               | oxff wrote:
               | All of mine are in same folder, and I use search or
               | linked / unlinked panels for finding / creating links.
               | Thousands of notes in same folder doesnt really matter if
               | you use the Obs. provided tools to navigate it.
        
               | edelans wrote:
               | interesting. Thanks for sharing. I should probably give
               | it a try and "let go" some control over the structure.
        
               | oxff wrote:
               | The structure is there, it's just not in the file /
               | folder layout, but in the wikilinks and whatever else
               | Obsidian can uncover (ie. unlinked mentions, orphaned
               | file output).
               | 
               | I guess I learned how my own learning and memorizing
               | works, and managed to match it better with how Obsidian
               | works, and now I don't have to think about silly file /
               | folder structure anymore. Your experience maybe
               | different.
        
               | edelans wrote:
               | I'm very curious about this way of using obsidian (which
               | sounds like the original "second brain" promise). I would
               | love to connect in private to konw more. I don't see your
               | address in your profile but you reach me at my hn user
               | name with Gmail.
        
               | leogout wrote:
               | Personnally I use tags for this usecase, I tag every
               | single note in obsidian and I use a plugin called Tag
               | Wrangler to show my tags as a tree. Tags then act like
               | folders (for example a tag #python/pip will be under
               | python > pip).
               | 
               | Pros :
               | 
               | - A note can fall under as many tags as you want
               | 
               | - The map view is pleasing to watch because tags can be
               | shown but folders cannot, it also helps to categorize
               | orhpan notes visually
               | 
               | Cons :
               | 
               | - You have to maintain the habit to tag each notes you
               | write
               | 
               | Finally, Tag Wrangler allows you to rename / edit tags in
               | bulk so that it is close to be as fluid as moving notes
               | between folders.
        
             | mellavora wrote:
             | I prefer folders.
             | 
             | Memory, on a biological level, is tied very strongly to
             | place or paths. Not just in humans, not just in mammals.
             | 
             | My folder hierarchy gives me a path that lets me find
             | things. I remember where I put them, I remember where to
             | find them.
             | 
             | If I need to search, fd and rg at a high level of the
             | folder tree is a godsend.
             | 
             | Tags mean it is just floating in some cloud somewhere,
             | locationless.
             | 
             | There can be friction if something could go into multiple
             | categories, and one will always need a wildcard category,
             | but these can be managed.
             | 
             | The Johnny Decimal system https://johnnydecimal.com/ can be
             | a nice structured approach. Creator is here on HN
             | somewhere; that's where I learned about it.
        
               | [deleted]
        
       | beermonster wrote:
       | I'll probably try out both Obsidian and LogSeq at some point. Do
       | their use-cases overlap or are there different goals of each
       | project?
        
         | ajvs wrote:
         | Depends the style of notetaking you prefer - document or
         | outliner. I prefer outliner because it allows me to slap
         | everything all nicely organised into one massive file.
         | 
         | Another big difference is open-source - Logseq is, Obsidian
         | isn't.
        
       | throwaway180118 wrote:
       | I've seen a lot of recent posts about Obsidian in the past week.
       | If it's a marketing tactic then it might be working on me. I hope
       | it's a decent product and not just some PR stunt.
        
         | puchatek wrote:
         | Gotta admit i also checked out obsidian and the top review for
         | the app on the play store gave me pause. Seems the app cannot
         | sync with your local server so you'd need the sync subscription
         | if you wanted to use app and desktop together to maintain one
         | set of notes.
         | 
         | Can someone confirm this?
        
           | emptysands wrote:
           | I use the sync feature, but its not required. There are
           | several tutorials for using got with a community plugin or an
           | alternative like syncthing.
           | 
           | Its just text after all. Which is the point of using
           | Obsidian.
           | 
           | Paying for sync is like paying to support the software
           | development. Which is worth doing for Obsidian. Plus I find
           | it useful. I am on the older lower rate.
        
           | Kelteseth wrote:
           | I used the git plugin for this on my iPad. This uses a JS
           | based git version.
        
           | johntash wrote:
           | There's a plugin called "Remotely Save". I use it to sync to
           | nextcloud (webdav), but there's also another plugin for
           | syncing to a git repo.
           | 
           | And worst case, you can use any 3rd party file syncing tool
           | like nextcloud, dropbox, syncthing, etc since it's just a
           | directory of files.
        
           | Sakos wrote:
           | Obsidian saves to a bunch of openly accessible markdown
           | files. You can sync them however you want.
        
           | eXpl0it3r wrote:
           | Cross system / OS landscapes can make it nearly impossible
           | without Obsidian Sync. It's okay for Android & Windows, but
           | if you throw an iPad into the mix, you can't really find a
           | local/cloud sync for them all. iOS especially has some
           | limitations on how apps can access files, so your only
           | options are iCloud or Obsidian Sync.
           | 
           | For more info see here: https://help.obsidian.md/Getting+star
           | ted/Sync+your+notes+acr...
        
             | pomatic wrote:
             | I use a community plugin that saves to a Hetzner storage
             | box, which support webdav off the shelf. Works flawlessly
             | across all the platforms you mention and Linux too.
        
             | throwaway675309 wrote:
             | This is untrue, I use iOS Working Copy connected to my git
             | repo which contains my Obsidian vault. It's also on on my
             | android pixel phone and I have it on my windows machine.
             | Everything syncs just fine using a private github repo.
        
               | mateuszf wrote:
               | Do you use end to end encryption? I don't want 3rd party
               | companies to see my data.
               | 
               | Of course obsidian is not open source so I can't
               | guarantee their e2e sync service doesn't sneakily send
               | the data to their servers, but it's still less risky than
               | having it easily available to the company employees.
        
           | [deleted]
        
           | leovander wrote:
           | I have it synced in a git repo, and I use their apps on
           | windows and macos. I lazily use the git plugin to commit and
           | push changes, but you can do at all in the command line if
           | you wanted. Reminder, it's a bunch of plain text markdown
           | files so commit away.
        
           | ephimetheus wrote:
           | On iOS/macOS you can use iCloud Drive to synchronize without
           | the subscription. It doesn't work flawlessly but it's ,,ok".
        
           | Sprocklem wrote:
           | I use Syncthing to sync between my android phone and my
           | computer without a subscription, and everything has been
           | working perfectly.
        
         | wellthisisgreat wrote:
         | Switched to it from Bear Notes, Apple Notes.
         | 
         | Not affiliated with Obsidian. Can recommend it wholeheartedly.
        
         | greyman wrote:
         | But why, it's a free product. I used it for some time but then
         | switched to Logseq.
        
       | tuan3w wrote:
       | I published my Obsidian vault template in Github more than 1 year
       | ago [1]. It has some templates and tips that I use regularly now.
       | It may help others.
       | 
       | [1] https://github.com/tuan3w/obsidian-template
        
       | sn41 wrote:
       | I'm an ardent Emacs user for the past 20+ years. But I am
       | considering writing a book, and the "throw things in anyhow, get
       | things back" facility of Obsidian is quite useful for catching
       | disparate thoughts to later incorporate into a flow in the final
       | text.. Of course there is a mode in Emacs supporting obsidian-
       | like facility, but does not feel as convenient - autocomplete
       | never quite works as smooth as it does in Obsidian. For now, I am
       | very impressed with the simplicity of Obsidian's usage.
        
         | beermonster wrote:
         | > Of course there is a mode in Emacs supporting obsidian-like
         | facility
         | 
         | Do you mean org-roam ?
        
         | ubermonkey wrote:
         | Nothing is ever "as convenient" in emacs, and I say that as a
         | fairly die-hard user of OrgMode.
         | 
         | I'm pretty curious about my ability to migrate to Obsidian and
         | away from Org/emacs, mostly for reasons of polish. I'm not ever
         | going to become a lisp hacker, but I ended up in Org because it
         | was the ONLY thing I could find that allowed me to keep notes
         | and to-dos intermingled, while giving me a great ability to
         | pull out and collate those to-dos in a dynamic view.
         | 
         | Obsidian can do that, too.
        
         | chungus wrote:
         | What Emacs mode might that be? And are there more reasons it
         | falls short, besides the autocomplete?
        
           | sn41 wrote:
           | There is a simple mode available on melpa, called obsidian.
           | The issue with it which I am facing is that if you link using
           | markdown in actual Obsidian, it is able to find the link in
           | whichever subfolder of the vault the target is in. But this
           | does not seem to work with the emacs mode. It searches only
           | the top vault path - so creates a new file when the file
           | actually already exists in some subfolder. Maybe it is
           | something I am doing wrong, I will read the source code and
           | figure out/change the code.
        
         | osener wrote:
         | I went with Logseq because it can be configured to use org-mode
         | syntax in place of Markdown, and I'm really happy with it.
        
           | ajvs wrote:
           | Same, and the plugin ecosystem is quite big too.
        
         | Cthulhu_ wrote:
         | As a wildly alternative workflow for writing a book, have a
         | look at Scrivener.
        
           | _glass wrote:
           | I am writing right now my PhD thesis with Scrivener, and it's
           | perfect, except (!) reference management is not working. My
           | workaround is to have everything in Zotero, and manually put
           | in the references, hoping I can convert later, in a big dirty
           | manual step.
        
           | wellthisisgreat wrote:
           | Wrote a book (93k words) in Scrivener, so can confirm.
           | 
           | Could probably have done it in Obsidian too but didn't know
           | of it when I was starting. Also compiling features of
           | Scrivener (format the text into industry-accepted formats) is
           | nice
        
           | sn41 wrote:
           | Scrivener is pretty impressive, but its Latex capabilities
           | are not as good as those of other formats. I found indexing
           | and bibliography lookup to be spotty. Another reason I found
           | it lacking was when having labelled equations to be later
           | referenced, Scrivener does not seem to have an autocomplete
           | for this.
        
       | JonChesterfield wrote:
       | Buried in this is a reference to
       | https://help.obsidian.md/How+to/Link+to+blocks
       | 
       | Turns out a (carefully written) link in one document will render
       | as the contents of some part of another document. Possibly more
       | useful in this context is
       | https://help.obsidian.md/How+to/Embed+files
       | 
       | I've been trying literate programming in obsidian and that looks
       | like a very direct solution to having source code in separate
       | files, which all the tooling definitely prefers, which still
       | renders inline from the main document.
       | 
       | Does broadly work - the ```C ``` style block disables the
       | embedding, so the markdown syntax to pretty print the code needs
       | to be in the source file, not in the file that embeds it. Also
       | the ^block_name syntax can't be on the same line as the closing
       | ```.
        
       | NickBusey wrote:
       | Much of what the author does manually can be automated even
       | further. For example, the whole "Working with Embeds" section
       | could be replaced with a DataView query.
       | 
       | I use DataView extensively to great effect. For example, every
       | "Project" note uses the same template, which includes a #Project
       | tag and a Status:: value containing a red, yellow, or green
       | square emoji.
       | 
       | Then a simple query like:
       | 
       | ```dataview TABLE Status FROM #Projects SORT file.mtime ASC ```
       | 
       | Gives you a very nice looking, automatically sorted and up to
       | date Project status table.
        
       | d33d33 wrote:
       | i found my love in Trilium what has everything i need and if
       | needed, i can still change the code by myself (AGPL) + files are
       | stored as markdown documents (so i am still able to get into my
       | notes, even if the repo would disappear). see
       | https://github.com/zadam/trilium
       | 
       | TLDR; - future proof file format (markdown)
       | 
       | - possible as local standalone + sync to simple cloud storage
       | (like gdrive/dropbox/...)
       | 
       | - gantt charting
       | 
       | - uml diagramming
       | 
       | - task management
       | 
       | - available on github
       | 
       | - active development in the last months and years
       | 
       | - editable
        
         | corncob15 wrote:
         | Obsidian stores all your files as Markdown as well, and has
         | plugins to automatically back up your vault using Git on a set
         | interval. I'm pretty sure across my various cloud sync and disk
         | backup setups my Obsidian vault is fully recoverable from five
         | different independent data sources, only one of which (Obsidian
         | Sync) has any dependency on Obsidian itself.
        
         | The_Colonel wrote:
         | Some corrections:
         | 
         | > - future proof file format (markdown)
         | 
         | Trilium has Markdown-like editing experience, but it stores the
         | notes in HTML. Which is IMHO more future-proof than Markdown.
         | 
         | > - possible as local standalone + sync to simple cloud storage
         | (like gdrive/dropbox/...)
         | 
         | Trilium stores data in an SQLite database, and sync tools like
         | gdrive/dropbox don't know how to sync it and usually corrupt
         | the database. To sync correctly, you need to have a server with
         | trilium installed.
        
           | alwillis wrote:
           | _...but it stores the notes in HTML. Which is IMHO more
           | future-proof than Markdown._
           | 
           | No--Markdown is just plaintext, which by definition is the
           | most future-proof format that exists.
           | 
           | HTML is a structured markup language that has multiple
           | versions and tags that come and go. And it's dependent on a
           | user agent (such as a browser or voice assistant) to render
           | it into something a human can view or listen to.
           | 
           | And while Markdown _can_ be rendered, it's not required to be
           | human readable.
        
             | The_Colonel wrote:
             | > No--Markdown is just plaintext, which by definition is
             | the most future-proof format that exists.
             | 
             | HTML is human-readable as well. I'm not sure if it's really
             | a dealbreaker if you have to read <em>text</em> instead of
             | _em_.
             | 
             | Markdown's big problem is standardization. It does have a
             | standard, but it doesn't seem widely implemented, and it's
             | notably poor - not even basic features such as tables are
             | standardized. That's kind of a big deal for being future-
             | proof. Worse, Markdown documents do not even record the
             | Markdown flavor they are using.
             | 
             | You might say that it doesn't matter as it's still sort of
             | readable even if you can't understand exact formatting
             | detail. But again, so is HTML.
             | 
             | In my view, the future-proofness which actually matters is
             | the tool support - and you have a much higher chance that
             | in 30 years tools will correctly support HTML than
             | Markdown.
        
       | wyclif wrote:
       | Did he mean to link to his Obsidian config? It looks like there's
       | supposed to be a link there but there isn't.
        
         | avjinder wrote:
         | Yes, seems like the config could not be found.
        
         | chriskrycho wrote:
         | Yeah, I intended to link it when I started drafting this months
         | ago but then forgot to add the link _and_ my config is out of
         | date now that Obsidian 1.0 is out, so I removed it when someone
         | else pointed out the same typo. Sorry about that!
        
       | Abishek_Muthian wrote:
       | Since this post will attract Obisidan veterans, I asking for some
       | validation of two potential need-gaps in Obisidian I'm tracking
       | for a while -
       | 
       | 1. Live recommendation for Obsidian[1]
       | 
       | Say I'm typing a note and write a sentence about echo location
       | then I get recommended a previous note with a comment from a HN
       | user about how moths escape bats by deafening it in a side panel.
       | 
       | It's not a keyword based recommendation, But a sentence
       | classification (I understand the compute overhead drawback).
       | 
       | 2. Automatic tag generator for Obsidian[2]
       | 
       | This is simpler, Generate tags for the notes automatically based
       | on previous tags and if none is available then generate new tags.
       | 
       | [1] https://needgap.com/problems/409-live-recommendation-for-
       | obs... (Disclosure: It's my problem validation forum)
       | 
       | [2] https://needgap.com/problems/408-automatic-tag-generator-
       | for...
        
         | throwaway675309 wrote:
         | The only notetaking tool I found that had support for live
         | recommendations was Evernote which did something called context
         | notes, it was quite useful.
        
           | Abishek_Muthian wrote:
           | Thanks, I will check it out. Btw, Others in Obsidian forums
           | have mentioned DEVONthink as well.
        
         | brimwats wrote:
         | try either the Influx or Strange New World plugins for #1,
         | depending on how you have your vault set up (either mostly
         | daily notes or not respectively)
        
           | Abishek_Muthian wrote:
           | Thanks, Influx does provide recommendations but it seems to
           | require prior snippet in the notes; I'm thinking about live
           | recommendation without prior action from the user apart from
           | just writing notes.
        
         | setr wrote:
         | Regarding point 1, are.na effectively does this for
         | bookmarking, by showing you the categories that others have
         | stored the same bookmark to (so really showing you what they
         | thought was related, according to whatever relationship they
         | were interested in) which I think is a much more reliable/same
         | way to approach the problem -- its much more precise, as the
         | other user was literally on the same page as you at some point,
         | rather than whatever tangential topical relationship identified
         | by keyword matching. And it's more broad, as the relationships
         | you can find are not simply the literal topic itself (e.g.
         | hexing the technical interview might be stored by one user
         | alongside programming taos, and by another with closure
         | hackery, and another with programmers-as-wizards).
        
           | Abishek_Muthian wrote:
           | Very interesting, Thanks for introducing me to are.na.
           | 
           | I like that they've essentially outsourced the computation
           | required to classify the content to real humans.
           | 
           | I understand the value in adding context to the bookmarks,
           | But does it help in any way to recall a bookmark when I need
           | it? Because not using the bookmark is a real problem[1] but I
           | find the suggestions from bookmarks in Firefox address bar
           | quite useful; Integration of in other writing tools which
           | knows the content of the bookmarks could be useful.
           | 
           | [1] https://needgap.com/problems/57-i-forget-my-web-
           | bookmarks-qu...
        
             | setr wrote:
             | > But does it help in any way to recall a bookmark when I
             | need it?
             | 
             | Not particularly, except that the same bookmark can be
             | placed in multiple groupings, so the usual organizational
             | structure used is typically more conceptual; e.g. I had a
             | grouping for Anime Recommendation System, which shares a
             | bunch of links with CS Whitepapers as well as Social
             | Dynamics; and of course Evangelion gets plastered in all
             | sorts of random topics. CS Whitepapers is a fairly useless
             | category for recall but a nice place to dump things,
             | whereas Anime Recommendation System is a more focused
             | project -- and if I'm looking for recommendation system
             | papers, I'll obviously remember the latter more clearly,
             | and find the related.
             | 
             | So basically recall by duplication, and the organizational
             | flexibility.
             | 
             | Recall by auto-suggestion I think is useful in a different
             | fashion, but vaguely meets the above by accident. It mostly
             | serves to:
             | 
             | 1. Help you complete a URL you only partially remember
             | 
             | 2. Show you bookmarks that are strictly related to what
             | you're doing, based on similar keywords + a neighboring
             | expansion of them
             | 
             | 3. Accidentally show you bookmarks completely unrelated to
             | what you're doing, but causes a mental refresh - this is
             | where it mostly competes with are.na
             | 
             | In other words, the autosuggestion is googling, and are.na
             | is acting like Wikipedia. The former is much faster, and
             | better when you're precise, but its similarity metrics are
             | quite limited. Whereas the latter can cross much wider
             | chasms of similarity
        
       | for_i_in_range wrote:
       | Alternatively, there's the pen and paper version of Obsidian:
       | https://www.antinet.org/
        
         | agileAlligator wrote:
         | Interesting! Now I wonder if this system can be digitized....
         | (I am way too lazy to take pen and paper notes lol)
        
       | terminal_d wrote:
        
       | hoseja wrote:
       | This would be interesting if it was about chiseling a volcanic
       | glass, not another note-taking app.
        
       | tarr11 wrote:
       | I'd really like to understand how people managers who work on
       | teams / corporate environments use Obsidian.
       | 
       | I find that most of my work meetings are shared docs. It often
       | feels like double work to put some things in Obsidian and move
       | them around.
       | 
       | I also don't use Obsidian as a task list - I use Todoist which is
       | totally fine for that.
        
         | ytechie wrote:
         | I haven't updated it recently, but this should give you a
         | starting point: https://github.com/ytechie/obsidian-sample
         | 
         | There are some challenges with duplication, and I either keep
         | my own version (focused on what I need to know about it), or I
         | just have a link to the other system.
        
       | drakonka wrote:
       | I tried Obsidian on Windows early this year and found it to be
       | quite slow and clunky, but it seems like everyone else loves it.
       | Is it that the software has improved since earlier this year, or
       | was it just a local issue all along?
        
         | scambier wrote:
         | They recently released 1.0 (with an announcement on HN too),
         | which changed the interface to something more tabs-centric.
         | It's not faster - it's still an electron app - but it
         | definitely feels less clunky.
        
         | brimwats wrote:
         | I've never heard it described as slow, except in cases of
         | purposefully stress teasing (vaults with 100,000+ notes). I've
         | got nearly 10k and it works great on a 10yo laptop.
        
         | Sakos wrote:
         | I think people are just tolerant. I've used it on an M1 MacBook
         | and a Ryzen 2600 and I've been using it on and off for years.
         | It always feels a bit slow and sluggish, and I still open
         | sublimetext first out of habit because of how much more
         | performant and fluid it feels.
        
       | Aperocky wrote:
       | For the unix fundamentalist out here:
       | 
       | https://github.com/Aperocky/diaryman/blob/master/diaryman.sh
       | 
       | I had this little script aliased from shell, whenever I type
       | `diary` it creates/open the current days' note file in vim.
        
       | mnw21cam wrote:
       | And there I was all excited, expecting long-term preservation of
       | writing by 3D-printing molten rock.
       | 
       | I'm a strong believer that names of software packages should be
       | chosen to be something that doesn't yet return any results from a
       | Google search.
        
         | dwils098 wrote:
         | Tell that to Microsoft, ehm... Windows.
        
           | mnw21cam wrote:
           | At least then you can google for "Microsoft Windows" and get
           | specific results, but yes it is annoying that it pollutes all
           | the search results when you are looking for sheets of glass.
        
       | ygouzerh wrote:
       | That's a very good idea to write down what you did during the
       | day, it saved me from a bad burnout. I was working on multiple
       | projects in parallel, and got the feeling that I was doing
       | nothing productive on my day, but was always stressed and tired.
       | 
       | Writing down what you did during the day allows to see that you
       | actually did a lot of things. I put even meeting and technical
       | discussions with others, because it's still takes work time.
        
       | revskill wrote:
       | My note taking system is simple:
       | 
       | I'm using MacOS Notes application, in that basically have two
       | important notes: Reading and Writing.
       | 
       | My professional life is mostly about reading and writing.
       | 
       | Other minor notes include: Awesome materials.
       | 
       | I never have a separate Todo/Outcomes,.. notes.
        
       | tunnuz wrote:
       | This was like a window in an alternate dimension for me: I had no
       | idea documenting what you do was a thing and the way the author
       | describes it makes it sound like a well-known activity that
       | everybody does. Have I been living under a rock?
        
         | Cthulhu_ wrote:
         | Nah, counter-non-scientific-anecdote, very few people do it.
         | Most of what I do is forgettable and not important. Code is in
         | git and tasks are in jira, websites I want to remember are in
         | my bookmarks; I never think "I wish I took minutes of my day
         | from such-and-such date three years ago".
         | 
         | But to each their own; if this is your jam, by all means. It
         | KINDA feels like justifying your day and activities though.
         | Some people work in teams or environments where they have to
         | justify their time or report what they did the previous day in
         | a daily stand-up, for who it may be relevant.
        
       | beezlewax wrote:
       | How do you guys handle images in Obsidian? I can't zoom or see
       | detail on large screen shots for example. Pretty new to the
       | application so maybe I'm missing something
        
         | gilrain wrote:
         | Media management is entirely manual and very bare bones,
         | unfortunately.
        
         | belmat wrote:
         | I use a plugin called Image Toolkit [0]. When you click on an
         | image it opens an overlay that lets you zoom and do some light
         | editing. I started including images in my notes inline, scaled
         | down to about 50px (so they are still roughly recognizable),
         | and clicking on them when I want to see them in detail.
         | 
         | [0] obsidian://show-plugin?id=obsidian-image-toolkit
        
           | beezlewax wrote:
           | Nice that will do the trick for my needs. Thank you!
        
         | BlameKaneda wrote:
         | You can do:
         | 
         |  _![[Pasted image 20221028163039.png|500]]_
         | 
         | If you want to adjust the width and height, then you can do
         | this:
         | 
         |  _![[Pasted image 20221028163039.png|500x700]]_
        
         | Mandelmus wrote:
         | I have yet to find a way to use Obsidian with images (sketches,
         | diagrams) as easily as I would like. If there was a way to
         | combine Obsidian's keyboard-based note-taking features
         | (including LaTeX equations) with graphics and diagrams drawn in
         | an app like GoodNotes 5 for iPad, that would be fantastic.
        
           | krimpenrik wrote:
           | Like mentioned, the excalidraw plugin is a game changer
        
           | wilsongoode wrote:
           | Have you tried the Excalidraw plugin?
        
       | darreld wrote:
       | I'd love to try something like this but my problem is that I
       | routinely use 3 different computers throughout the day(Windows,
       | Mac and Linux. Could this be used with git to keep things sync'd?
        
         | mikhailt wrote:
         | Same here, I need something that's encrypted and cross-
         | platform. Plus a decent price for cloud sync with storage a
         | separate fee if possible.
        
       | mavci wrote:
       | I am very impressed in the detail that the picture in the article
       | is also a screenshot in dark mode when I switch to dark mode.
       | Well done.
        
         | pasquinelli wrote:
         | and it's a very nice looking blog.
        
       | [deleted]
        
       | UI_at_80x24 wrote:
       | General question for the Obsidian gurus in the audience.
       | Is there anyway to use tab-key mid-line?  I do not want to indent
       | the start of my line, and I'd be happy to have tab-character
       | auto-convert to spaces, but I cannot use this tool unless I have
       | a way to tab.              I seem to use tab to make columns of
       | lists, usually two or three columns worth.  A decent analogy
       | would be like the hosts file, or CRON.  2+ vertically aligned
       | columns of lists.              I understand that <TAB> doesn't
       | exist in markdown, but vim is able to convert tab-characters to
       | spaces, is there any kind of plugin that allows this
       | functionality?
        
         | axelf4 wrote:
         | That just sounds like a table but with extra steps?
        
           | UI_at_80x24 wrote:
           | Are you saying that there is functionality called a `table`
           | that I could use to give me similar results?
           | 
           | I don't need/want a fancy grid, I just make multi-columned
           | lists a lot.
           | 
           | Another similar use-case: recipes!                   1cup
           | flour             extra fine/sifted           1tsp    vanilla
           | extract is fine         1/4cup  something else    more
           | cooking words
           | 
           | It's not a lot steps, but if there's a table function I could
           | look into without creating a grid, I could probably use that.
        
             | Macha wrote:
             | There are plugins like improved tables (
             | https://github.com/tgrosinger/advanced-tables-obsidian )
             | which make markdown tables quicker to write up.
        
             | JackMorgan wrote:
             | I use a table plugin for both phone and desktop. It's a
             | little finicky on the phone, but doable.
        
       | eddof13 wrote:
       | I use obsidian because apple notes lost all my notes amazingly
       | when syncing between two computers and my phone- and my hope is
       | that the markdown file method that obsidian uses in iCloud will
       | be more resilient.
       | 
       | That said I'd rather have something that versions my notes files
        
       | uxdx wrote:
       | My note taking system is a single "donelist.txt" that sits in a
       | GDrive/onedrive/xdrive on my machine. Entries are:
       | 
       | 9.11.22
       | 
       | scrum
       | 
       | working on stry1234
       | 
       | meeting X
       | 
       | - do a thing
       | 
       | lunch
       | 
       | created PR for stry1234
       | 
       | meeting Y
       | 
       | 8.11.22
       | 
       | scrum
       | 
       | working on def4321
       | 
       | lunch
       | 
       | created PR def4321
       | 
       | meeting Z
       | 
       | meeting A
       | 
       | ...
       | 
       | This is good enough for me although I'm still figuring out how to
       | plan ahead better. Maybe I should write down how I expect the
       | week to go, goals and schedule, on Monday and update from there.
        
         | flakeoil wrote:
         | That's more or less what I did as well. But it got a bit messy
         | at the end so I started to use EasyOrg [0] which gives some
         | more structure so it is easier to search on and you also get a
         | useful Agenda/Calendar view where you can plan future tasks and
         | see old completed tasks.
         | 
         | [0] https://easyorgmode.com
        
       | fefe23 wrote:
       | Oh it's just an ad for some app.
       | 
       | Here I thought he was actually writing things in actual Obsidian.
       | That would have been actually interesting.
        
         | whoibrar wrote:
         | This is just someone sharing their workflow. What makes you
         | think this is an actual ad ?
        
           | fefe23 wrote:
           | Seriously? Where do I even start!
           | 
           | | Assumed Audience: People who are interested in working
           | effectively
           | 
           | Do you have this problem? Cue late-night "infomercial" video
           | of women having back pain and unable to reach can of tuna
           | high in the cupboard.
           | 
           | Then you need our miracle cure!
           | 
           | | Then I had a flash of inspiration: now that I'm using
           | Obsidian, I never have to do this again.
           | 
           | Oh look, it solves all the problems!
           | 
           | But wait there's more! Not only does it solve the problems,
           | it completely changes the calculus!
           | 
           | | Obsidian's block embeds change that calculus entirely.
           | 
           | That's incredible, Bob! I will call the phone number next to
           | my country's flag immediately!!
        
             | JonChesterfield wrote:
             | Doesn't make them wrong though.
        
               | fefe23 wrote:
               | I didn't say it was wrong.
               | 
               | I said I wasn't interested.
        
       | stavros wrote:
       | I had the same problem, but needed something quicker, so I made a
       | small CLI utility:
       | 
       | https://pypi.org/project/dia/
        
       | brightball wrote:
       | I hadn't seen the block embeds feature. I'm going to have to add
       | this to my workflow.
       | 
       | I typically keep a daily note and then if any one section gets
       | large, move it to it's own note and link it in my daily. The
       | blocks would be a great addition though.
        
       | agentwiggles wrote:
       | I have just started using Obsidian this last week or two in the
       | hopes of eventually migrating away from Notion. There are some
       | things I miss though, like to-do lists. I've also found that code
       | blocks are a little unreliable about whether they render pretty
       | or just stay markdown.
       | 
       | I like the idea of getting all my stuff local, but there are
       | going to be a few things about Notion that keep me there for a
       | while.
       | 
       | Also, (and this is slightly tangential since this doesn't exist
       | for Notion) - I would _love_ a nice way to be able to write
       | guitar tablature in my notes. If some kind of plugin exists for
       | that it would be awesome.
        
         | xerox13ster wrote:
         | Start and end your code blocks with the ticks on their own
         | line.
        
         | chriskrycho wrote:
         | To-do lists work a bit differently; they're just Markdown
         | tasks:                   - [ ] do something         - [x] did
         | something
         | 
         | However, there are a number of neat plugins which can integrate
         | those into anything from simple views of all open to-do items
         | to full-up Kanban boards. Additionally, the Minimal theme lets
         | you do Bullet Journal-style variations on that:
         | - [/] partially did something         - [<] scheduled something
         | - [>] punted something to the next day/etc.
        
       | examplary_cable wrote:
       | If anyone is interested in. I'm working on a "emacs-like" system
       | that you can also use to take notes in, but it's more line a
       | Outliner(like Roam Research) + Brownser. It's still in
       | development.
       | 
       | https://github.com/ilse-langnar/notebook
        
         | srcreigh wrote:
         | Nice. I see there's a little piano on there, is that part of
         | the app? One of my projects is always itching to become its own
         | livecoding platform too..
         | 
         | Are there any specific use cases you're working on right now?
         | 
         | BTW, I'm seeing blank page when I run the demo linked from the
         | README. Chrome on Windows.
        
       | mundietalk wrote:
       | I just installed Obsidian. Tried it. The vibe of the contents
       | that I put into Obsidian has a funny 'Obsidious' tone. I think a
       | neutral vibe is what is required for a generic content editing
       | software. Uninstalled.
        
         | gala8y wrote:
         | > The vibe of the contents that I put into Obsidian has a funny
         | 'Obsidious' tone.
         | 
         | What do you mean? In my opinion UI is absolutely minimal. Not a
         | single place with any kind of branding left - no logo, no
         | 'Obsidian' text repeated all over. Ok, there is 'Choose
         | Obsidian's default color scheme' in settings (totally
         | warranted). Clean as it can be. It is actually unique in that
         | matter of retracting logo/name from any view. There is branding
         | on vault opener/switcher, which is tasteful and just in place -
         | it's good to know what piece of software you're using, after
         | all.
        
           | mundietalk wrote:
           | I'm talking about the [feeling]. It just imbues everything.
        
             | gala8y wrote:
             | Well, I'm really curious, if you could try to describe it.
             | It is just interesting you get this. I am not here to
             | defend Obsidian in any way, rather interested in
             | understanding what it is all about.
        
               | mundietalk wrote:
               | It's a little like this:
               | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~. It's called
               | 'Feeling'. You know how certain objects feel a certain
               | way. I'm not here to defend a 'supposedly overrated'
               | text-image-arranging software that purports to be 'a
               | second brain' either. You build a GUI that feels like
               | [~~~~~this~~~~] then you 'Add an Emotional
               | Aura(https://sims4studio.com/thread/3517/tutorial-make-
               | object-emi...) that's supposed to make it seem 'edgy and
               | cool' like [~~~~~this~~~~], [~~~~that~~~~], or
               | [~~~~~something else~~~~~].
               | 
               | If you don't get this, probably your hemispheres are out
               | of sync. Reach out to someone who has good 'taste' in
               | music or clothes.
        
               | maksimur wrote:
               | It's weird how you phrased your comment, but I suppose it
               | gives you a cult vibe as opposed to say Typora or
               | Marktext, maybe because it's too distinct and kind of
               | opinionated and used/promoted by people who could be seen
               | as cult leaders?
        
               | mundietalk wrote:
               | Do you see a <homepage> anywhere where you can join my
               | cult, you cuck? It's pretty damn obvious your life goal
               | is to chew on some green paper, you sub-human expendable.
               | I get that how I 'phrased my comment' might be seen as
               | 'weird' by your types; you probably get that I used to
               | code.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2022-11-09 23:03 UTC)