[HN Gopher] 50 years ago, an artist exhibited an invented Iron A...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       50 years ago, an artist exhibited an invented Iron Age civilization
        
       Author : benbreen
       Score  : 88 points
       Date   : 2022-11-06 23:39 UTC (1 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (theconversation.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (theconversation.com)
        
       | gumby wrote:
       | What a marvelous story. Daly's project was also thoughtful (as
       | presented here, anyway) rather than a 1960s "shock" piece.
       | 
       | I was a little disappointed that the historical section was not
       | more detailed, especially as the beginning of the article talks
       | about today being a tie of misinformation. All cultures invent
       | historical precedent, of course. But this work brought to mind a
       | series of Nazi "documentaries" produced in the 1930s and 1940s
       | trying to justify the bogus "Aryan origin" narrative and in
       | particular to claim that the so-called "Aryan" German culture
       | they were asserting was in fact indigenous to German territory.
       | (Of course, like all cultures, it both is and is not).
       | 
       | I find this kind of thing particularly interesting and,
       | separately, hilarious, as I personally couldn't care less about
       | the idea that one's ancestry justifies one's own self. Thus its
       | importance to others makes it worth learning about.
       | 
       | (On the amusing side, I was particularly struck by a supposed
       | artifact, a sculpted head, that looked remarkably like Dilbert. I
       | told Scott Adams about it and he was suitably amused. But looking
       | now at his writing over the last six years or so one has to
       | wonder...:-).
        
       | bklaasen wrote:
       | A film of the exhibition captures the multimedia aspect well:
       | https://vimeo.com/721486048/description
       | 
       | (Via https://civilizationofllhuros.org/)
        
       | lolidk890 wrote:
       | Why do humans so often exaggerate their perception of
       | credibility?
        
         | swayvil wrote:
         | Because the emotion comes first, reason second. The primary
         | purpose of reason is to rationalize emotion.
         | 
         | In fact, I suspect that the entire sensorium (sight, sound,
         | etc) is an abstraction of emotion.
        
         | hirundo wrote:
         | Falling in love is often or even usually an example of that,
         | and has the result of increasing fertility, giving the
         | credulous a fitness advantage. A tribe with more credulous
         | warriors may have a military advantage by being more cohesive
         | and easier to lead.
        
         | adolph wrote:
         | The willing suspension of disbelief has been a successful
         | genetic mutation. Genes learned to meme.
        
       | vertnerd wrote:
       | Reminds me of Damien Hirst's recent "Treasures from the Wreck of
       | the Unbelievable," which was presented as a documentary film but
       | was, in fact, mockumentary.
        
       | swayvil wrote:
       | >One of his tall sculptural works had been exhibited in a faculty
       | dining room. But people kept mistaking it for a hat rack, which
       | frustrated Daly: He assumed that the value of an artwork was
       | self-evident and that it should be able to "speak for itself."
       | 
       | I'm of a similar view. I see 2 ways to overcome this.
       | 
       | 1) Make more accessible art (in extremis, boobs and such)
       | 
       | 2) Make more accessible people (massage, drugs...)
       | 
       | But I'm with Norman on this point : posting an explanatory essay
       | on the wall next to the piece is a very wrong turn.
        
       | warbler73 wrote:
       | Related is the amazing Museum of Jurassic Technology in Culver
       | City California.
        
       | JasonFruit wrote:
       | I've often considered constructing a series of instruments and
       | recording an album of "field recordings" of Ruritanian folk
       | music, maybe with singing in Esperanto or another constructed
       | language. That would be project enough, but it sounds like this
       | guy went a lot further (even though I think his "artifacts"
       | betray their origins a little too clearly for my taste).
        
       | JoeAltmaier wrote:
       | I saw an early 'Etruscan' exhibit years ago. All the artifacts
       | were so 'pat', so neatly calculated to be interesting that I had
       | suspicions that they were fake.
       | 
       | It can be hard to tell, especially when some folks _do fakes with
       | the intent to deceive_
        
         | wl wrote:
         | Unless the artifacts were archeologically excavated and
         | professionally conserved, they probably were fake to some
         | degree. The art market treats ancient artifacts like more
         | modern art, which are to be admired for their aesthetic
         | qualities and rarity rather than what they can tell us about
         | the past. They are to be bought and sold as an investment. They
         | are to be displayed to demonstrate refinement, sophistication,
         | and wealth. The result is that unscrupulous "restorations" that
         | enhance the aesthetic value of and apparent condition of
         | artifacts are par for the course.
         | 
         | The Oriental Institute Museum at the University of Chicago has
         | a really great exhibit[0] on this topic right now, comparing
         | Roman marbles archeologically excavated by the university with
         | similar items obtained from the art market. The exhibit opening
         | lecture on YouTube is worth watching if you're interested in
         | this kind of thing.
         | 
         | [0] https://oi.uchicago.edu/marbles
         | 
         | [1] https://youtu.be/DnMO5nYP-eo
        
         | djur wrote:
         | An exhibit is the outcome of multiple rounds of curation --
         | which items are preserved through history, which are acquired
         | by museums, which are retained, which are displayed, and the
         | prominence with which they are displayed. This curation is
         | always going to involve some kind of agenda, benign or
         | otherwise. In a sense you are correct that the exhibit you
         | viewed is fake in the sense of being a fabricated version of
         | reality. But that doesn't mean it was fake in the sense of
         | being fraudulent.
        
       | the_af wrote:
       | In case anyone is wondering: this wasn't a scam, but an art
       | exhibit in an art museum about an openly fake civilization, done
       | by an artist with mostly repurposed "found" objects.
       | 
       | The "convincingly exhibited" of the title is misleading. It
       | wasn't about deceiving people, it was about world-building. It
       | wasn't shown at a history museum.
       | 
       | It wasn't a hoax, but more of an artistic "mockumentary" for a
       | made up civilization. Almost borgean...
        
         | MarcelOlsz wrote:
         | F for Fake by Orson Welles is in the same vein. Still don't
         | know if it's a fiction or non-fiction.
        
         | rtanks wrote:
         | Agree
        
         | ispo wrote:
         | Borges and his men in that strange city...
        
         | duxup wrote:
         | That makes more sense as the detail and volume of information
         | indicated in the article seems like more than I would expect.
        
         | dang wrote:
         | Ok, we've made the title not say convincingly and replaced
         | 'fake' with 'invented'. Thanks!
        
         | xhkkffbf wrote:
         | Perhaps not an outright scam, but the tax-free structure of
         | Cornell and much of the art world is certainly a benefit that
         | most normal people and businesses don't enjoy.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2022-11-08 23:01 UTC)