[HN Gopher] Musk's advertiser push undermined by his own opening...
___________________________________________________________________
Musk's advertiser push undermined by his own opening moves
Author : rurp
Score : 18 points
Date : 2022-11-06 19:25 UTC (3 hours ago)
(HTM) web link (www.axios.com)
(TXT) w3m dump (www.axios.com)
| zackees wrote:
| All Musk has to do is create an Ad system that delivers positive
| ROI.
|
| That's it. If he does that then people will sign up because they
| enjoy scaling up their business. There is so much public backlash
| against the large advertisers anyway, especially Pfizer, that I
| think this is ultimately a good thing and establishes better
| Trust with Twitter and it's users.
| obblekk wrote:
| Ad revenue risk really breaks out by 2 major types of spending:
|
| 1. Brand Advertisers
|
| These companies don't measure direct ROI from their ads in the
| short run, but believe that it's important to put their brand and
| message out continuously to keep consumers engaged. Coke/Pepsi
| are the classic example. Very few people click on a Coke ad, land
| on a page, and put in their credit card to purchase a bottle of
| Coke right away.
|
| These companies care disproportionately about long term
| perception and therefore who their brand is associated with. They
| buy big event sponsorships for the same reason.
|
| 2. Direct response advertisers
|
| These companies continuously measure the ROI of ad spend vs.
| revenue impact, sometimes even on a weekly or monthly cadence.
| These companies have some limits (e.g. no ads on porn or
| violence), but generally are much more willing to buy less
| attractive inventory that has higher ROI.
|
| Classic examples here are Wish (or most ecommerce), SaaS, etc.
|
| Sales meetings and calls with advertisers happen almost only with
| brand advertisers because it is their business where decisions
| cannot be made simply by looking at the metrics. This is a lot of
| spend but, importantly, it's usually inefficient spend from an
| ROI perspective. If these folks exit the market, the direct
| response folks will see lower ad auction prices and
| proportionately increase their spend.
|
| These feedback loops take a few weeks/months to play out, but
| this means the impact of decreased brand spend is usually much
| less than appears on day 1.
|
| Twitter is a bit unique in that they probably have one of the
| worst direct response conversion rates, attribution,
| optimization, and overall performance. That's really where Elon
| should invest a significant amount of resources because that
| problem can be improved a lot with better adtech, rather than
| salesmanship.
|
| Google is generally the best at this ML based adtech optimization
| (people searching for products also tend to want to buy that
| product making their problem a little easier), followed by
| Facebook, followed by a bunch of 3rd party display platforms,
| followed by Twitter (in my experience as an ad buyer, but
| obviously not universal).
|
| If I were Elon, I would:
|
| 1. Create a new ad unit that can only be shown to verified users
| or adjacent to verified tweets - this should solve most ad fraud
| and content rule concerns. Ad unit should be launchable within a
| few weeks (harder technical problem because it requires context
| of what's adjacent in the feed, but can be hacked with rebates
| for improper impressions). Spend the next week selling this to
| brand spenders.
|
| 2. Spend 50% of my twitter energy hiring/empowering adtech
| experts (this is a playbook that has been done several times
| over)
|
| 3. Relaunch vine with trending videos on twitter (video ads)
|
| 4. Ignore search - technically hard problem with low 1yr ROI
|
| 5. Start decreasing organic reach for non-verified users in feed
| + upsell boosted posts -- this is Facebook Pages playbook and is
| super easy to implement technically (feed value model adjustment)
| [deleted]
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2022-11-06 23:02 UTC)