[HN Gopher] Lessons from the invention of the thermometer
___________________________________________________________________
Lessons from the invention of the thermometer
Author : firstSpeaker
Score : 35 points
Date : 2022-11-05 18:30 UTC (1 days ago)
(HTM) web link (antonhowes.substack.com)
(TXT) w3m dump (antonhowes.substack.com)
| dr_dshiv wrote:
| Cornelis Drebbels. Not only did he invent the thermometer he also
| invented the thermostat--an early example of cybernetics.
| Basically, expanding mercury would push up a plunger than would
| open the door to an egg incubator. By allowing the cold air in,
| the temperature of the incubator would decrease until the mercury
| shrank and the vent closed
| fuzzfactor wrote:
| >You're reading _Age of Invention_ ,
|
| >who was responsible for the breakthrough? And why does it
| matter?
|
| >Santorio was different. Santorio had spent most of his career
| totally obsessed with measuring things
|
| >What made Santorio so different, then, is that he became aware
| of the inverted flask experiment while _already_ looking for
| measuring devices. He was already thoroughly primed for making
| the connection to measuring temperature. It's the reality behind
| all those legendary _Eureka!_ moments. It's not that an ordinary
| person sees something mundane,
|
| >people who are _already_ actively trying to solve particular
| problems become reminded or aware of potential solutions. The
| inverted flask experiment was ancient and common. A mind actively
| searching for ways to measure things was not.
|
| >Those who see room for improvement where others do not -- those
| with the "improving mentality" -- are the people open to this
| kind of inspiration.
|
| >Inventors are rare enough to begin with --
|
| >Given the sheer size of what we haven't yet achieved,
|
| Get off your butt and invent something that's habit forming . . .
| echelon wrote:
| I know the HN guidelines say not to criticize a website's
| presentation, but Substack's new Medium-like subscription popup
| has me thinking something else.
|
| With the resurgence of desire for decentralization, I wonder if
| publishing too could leap into a p2p or widely-federated model.
|
| I assume authors are the ones opting into this behavior because
| they want either tracked followers or monetary subscriptions.
| (VC-fueled platforms probably urge the authors to consider it.)
|
| A system not tied down to a particular platform could reduce the
| friction. Micropayments + p2p / federation seem like they could
| work hand in hand. You'd see interesting content from all over
| the Internet bubble up into your feed, and you could opt to
| follow or subscribe (similar to Patreon or Github sponsorship).
|
| We'd finally be able to tweak the algorithm directly. Tune it to
| our interests, the discovery coefficients we want, and filter out
| known uninteresting content or bad actors. No more
| BlogThatIHate.com or InsufferableProductFan5.
|
| Bookmarking could exceed what any existing product can do. You
| could combine your feed/interest graph and bookmarks with your
| own personal approach to note taking and knowledge management.
| Instantly access quotes, data, and relevant materials. Your
| database would be portable, too.
|
| The cooking blogs you follow would be locally or cloud searchable
| with a nice gallery interface, and you could harness the semantic
| information within them to build shopping lists. (This, but for
| all applications. Photography, art, sports, gaming, code, debate,
| ...)
|
| Medium, Substack, Instagram, TikTok, etc. can't build that. It's
| too many products. That's why turning this into a shared protocol
| / data model and reusing the common pieces would allow more
| innovation and reuse than ever before. It's one of the original
| ambitions of the semantic web, but finally looks like something
| we understand enough to be able to model.
|
| Nevermind the politics. This would be amazing from an innovation,
| shared rails, reuse, and remix perspective.
| MichaelZuo wrote:
| The vast majority of users don't want to pay a small amount to
| dozens of writers each, but a moderate amount once a month to a
| single entity.
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2022-11-06 23:01 UTC)