[HN Gopher] Exploring the richness and variety of letters sent t...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Exploring the richness and variety of letters sent to the East
       India Company
        
       Author : Petiver
       Score  : 74 points
       Date   : 2022-10-26 22:37 UTC (3 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (blogs.bl.uk)
 (TXT) w3m dump (blogs.bl.uk)
        
       | 29athrowaway wrote:
       | The East India Company were the world's first narcos.
        
         | mradek wrote:
         | You're not wrong. They purposefully funneled opium into China
         | to get their silver bullion to open up trade, whilst also
         | destroying an entire generation.
         | 
         | Destruction of people was basically the EIC's MO.
        
           | detritus wrote:
           | Not really, it was 'just' sheer largely-unhinged capitalism.
           | 
           | Plus ca change.
        
           | somenameforme wrote:
           | Fun historic footnote on that as well. After China tried to
           | enforce their ban on opium trade, Britain declared war on
           | them to try to force them to accept it. The Brits won and
           | thereafter claimed Hong Kong as one of the spoils of war. A
           | spoil that was returned only in 1997, after which an
           | invisible (and on occasion not so invisible) game of tug-of-
           | war ensued. Can't wait to read the next chapter!
        
           | 29athrowaway wrote:
           | It doesn't stop with one generation.
           | 
           | As Chinese workers immigrated into America, they opened opium
           | dens here too.
           | 
           | https://www.foundsf.org/index.php?title=Chinatown%27s_Opium_.
           | ..
           | 
           | Then, the opium poppy, a plant not endemic to the Americas,
           | started being cultivated in Mexico. Why Mexico? because the
           | US banned Chinese immigration.
           | 
           | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_Exclusion_Act
           | 
           | We cannot ever blame the drug crisis on the British because
           | it breaks the rules of history where history is written by
           | the victors. We have to let people get away with stuff. We
           | cannot describe the EIC as narcos, and if someone does, we
           | have to downvote them.
        
             | mjburgess wrote:
             | The problem with this analysis is: where does the buck
             | stop?
             | 
             | Why does moral responsibility always stop with Europeans?
             | Does Europe posses some Adult Moral capability the Mexicans
             | lack?
             | 
             | Whatever story of woe you want to tell about why "china did
             | X", can be told likewise about europe. The buck, stops
             | where then? The Romans? The Celts?
        
               | SrslyJosh wrote:
               | > Why does moral responsibility always stop with
               | Europeans?
               | 
               | Probably because they were the ones violently subjugating
               | everyone else.
        
       | MaysonL wrote:
       | I've just been reading Babel, by R.F.Kuang, a fantasy novel which
       | explores the E.I.C. in a strange and wonderful way. Well worth
       | reading.
        
       | sklargh wrote:
       | Encourage persons interested in these letters to read The Anarchy
       | by William Dalrymple. Summarizes establishment of East India Co.
       | and subsequent financial outcomes and violence.
        
       | Jun8 wrote:
       | If you want to delve into the history of EIC (and you should,
       | esp. if you're interested in how Northern Europe's tremendous
       | growth was fueled) I suggest reading _The Anarchy_ by Dalrymple.
       | It has great detail but also vey well written and engaging
       | (qualities usually hard to combine in history books).
        
         | pinkwinds wrote:
         | Also in the same vein Dalrymple and Anita Anand have a podcast
         | called Empire.
        
         | la64710 wrote:
         | And for the perspective of the modern jewel of the empire May I
         | suggest watching the views of Indias MP and diplomat Mr Shashi
         | Tharoor https://youtu.be/1giYXrofZYo
        
           | hawk_ wrote:
           | The video linked by parent is light on details. This one has
           | more details if anyone's interested (A debate on the empire
           | but many of the things apply to EIC)
           | https://youtu.be/f7CW7S0zxv4
        
         | notart666 wrote:
         | Are we considering the UK the entirety of Northern Europe now?
         | That's a bold claim. If I recall correctly most of northern
         | Europe stayed in poverty long after the end of the British East
         | India Company
        
           | Jun8 wrote:
           | I wasn't clear in my comment: note that the Dutch India
           | Company was a precursor to the EIC and there was a lot of
           | competition between the two( among other powers). The concept
           | of LLC was mainly invented there. The book covers these
           | points extensively and contrast the development in Southern
           | Europe.
        
           | DiggyJohnson wrote:
           | No, this seems like a naive uninformed comment unless you say
           | more.
        
           | biorach wrote:
           | The tone of your comment was unnecessarily sarcastic and
           | confrontational.
        
             | hungryforcodes wrote:
             | Or just pointing out his / her opinion. Words like "bold
             | claim" and "if I recall correctly" are hardly sarcastic or
             | confrontational.
        
             | languageserver wrote:
             | making absurd statements that generalizes countries based
             | on another country's company deserves confrontation. What
             | does Sweden have to do with a British company? seems very
             | culturally insensitive
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2022-10-29 23:01 UTC)