[HN Gopher] Linux Security Hardening and Other Tweaks
___________________________________________________________________
Linux Security Hardening and Other Tweaks
Author : fonder
Score : 52 points
Date : 2022-10-28 15:51 UTC (7 hours ago)
(HTM) web link (vez.mrsk.me)
(TXT) w3m dump (vez.mrsk.me)
| suprjami wrote:
| Linux has randomised TCP Timestamps per-connection since v4.10 so
| there's no longer any need to disable them:
| https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/lin...
| fsflover wrote:
| I hardened my Linux by installing https://qubes-os.org instead.
| My daily driver for years.
| triter wrote:
| Shared404 wrote:
| What did you install it on? Qubes has tempted me for years but
| it's weight/lack of hardware compatibility has put me off.
| fsflover wrote:
| I run it on a Librem 15. For more laptops have a look here:
| https://forum.qubes-os.org/t/laptops-that-just-work-with-
| qub....
| drewlander wrote:
| Works just fine on my Dell Precision 7540. Tried briefly to
| get GPU passthrough to work but failed. I lack the time to
| seriously try. Otherwise, it works great.
| matthews2 wrote:
| > Sandboxing is a way to limit the potential damage a compromised
| process can do. Firejail is the tool I like the most for this
| task.
|
| Note that Firejail is a suid binary that has had a reasonable
| number of vulnerabilities in it, so it may hurt more than it
| helps.
|
| https://www.cvedetails.com/product/36171/Firejail-Project-Fi...
| fonder wrote:
| > it may hurt more than it helps.
|
| If we use a web browser as an example, what are the odds that a
| compromised website is going to try to exploit the browser
| itself vs. exploiting an external sandbox application? Clearly
| the former. Sandboxing a web browser will prevent many more
| classes of attack than it exposes you to.
|
| Also worth noting that the suid binary you mention will refuse
| to run at all if the executing user isn't in its whitelist.
| It's not like you can pop a shell on some ftp user and run
| firejail as root.
| readingnews wrote:
| You know, I rarely think about this:
|
| # chmod -R go-rwx /home/*
|
| Why are most default homes setup with a mode other than 700
| directories 600 files? I know, it is because of the default mask
| system wide, but it seems to make sense to do this to homes,
| unless I am missing something?
| nerdponx wrote:
| I have the same question. And why not go a step further? Set a
| default ACL on the home directory.
| technion wrote:
| Possibly a legacy of websites with tilde home directories being
| the norm at one time.
| icare_1er wrote:
| I'd also recommend checking any sudo commands you would like to
| put, in GTFObins first.
|
| You'd be surprised how many executables can actually permit
| running commands.
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2022-10-28 23:01 UTC)