[HN Gopher] Time to Run and Pee during a movie so you don't miss...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Time to Run and Pee during a movie so you don't miss the best
       scenes
        
       Author : WayToDoor
       Score  : 55 points
       Date   : 2022-10-25 16:51 UTC (6 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (runpee.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (runpee.com)
        
       | lupire wrote:
       | Aka Intermission.
       | 
       | Or Interpission.
        
         | pvaldes wrote:
         | Required Pission impissible category for the more accelerated
         | and hardest films.
        
         | robertlagrant wrote:
         | Interpission is good, but scientists are still trying to
         | achieve the holy grail of interpusion.
        
           | shepherdjerred wrote:
           | We're only 10 years away
        
         | dmitriid wrote:
         | In Turkey cinemas used to have intermissions for every movie.
         | Even in early 2000s. I don't know if it's still the case.
        
       | Jackpillar wrote:
       | Random but this app was founded by ex-NFL quarterback Carson
       | Palmer's brother Jordan.
       | 
       | Also still requires you to check your phone during a movie which
       | should be immediate jail time across the board.
        
         | avree wrote:
         | Covered in their marketing copy: "Built in Timer so you can
         | enjoy using the RunPee app during a movie without disturbing
         | those around you."
        
         | fshbbdssbbgdd wrote:
         | >Also still requires you to check your phone during a movie
         | which should be immediate jail time across the board
         | 
         | Not true! The app has cues that you can read ahead of time. Eg:
         | 
         | > Bob says "I didn't know you were French!"
         | 
         | When you hear Bob say that, there's your chance to go.
         | 
         | The app will give roughly 3 cues per movie, about 15 to 30 mins
         | apart, so you have multiple chances.
         | 
         | Also, apparently you can set it to go off with a timer,
         | although I haven't used that feature. On iPhones you can allow
         | specific apps notify even when you're on Do Not Disturb, which
         | would probably be useful in this case.
        
         | ryukafalz wrote:
         | > Also still requires you to check your phone during a movie
         | 
         | Unless you use a smartwatch.
        
           | carrotcarrot wrote:
           | That's just a tiny phone on your wrist. If anything it's
           | worse because you have it out during the entire movie.
        
             | dylan604 wrote:
             | mine has a theater mode specifically for this. yours
             | doesn't? sounds like you "chose poorly" to quite the movie.
        
         | tomjakubowski wrote:
         | A live sports version of this app, predicated on the likelihood
         | of a big play coming up, would be fun.
        
           | jdminhbg wrote:
           | It would be fun to think about predictive upcoming down/ad
           | time. For example, one of the worst offenders in live sports
           | is the ad break-kickoff-ad break sequence in an NFL game. If
           | you could predict based on how many ad breaks have already
           | happened whether such a thing was about to take place, you
           | could get buzzed right after a touchdown: "hey, you're about
           | to get 6 minutes where nothing happens but a touchback, you
           | can take a bathroom break plus refill your drink."
        
         | nikanj wrote:
         | Or check it beforehand, and remember when you can go pee?
        
         | makeset wrote:
         | Start the timer on the beginning cue and it will vibrate at pee
         | times.
        
         | nonameiguess wrote:
         | Jordan Palmer is also an ex-NFL quarterback. He never started,
         | wasn't that good, didn't last long, and only had 18 career
         | passing attempts, certainly no Carson, but he was still a pro.
        
           | Firmwarrior wrote:
           | It's pretty funny that he probably looks bad in context, but
           | if he showed up to a non-NFL match he'd be hilariously better
           | than everyone there
           | 
           | I think about that a lot when I'm trudging through the muck
           | on forums, especially TeamBlind. There are kids in their 20s
           | getting burned out at Amazon who'd be able to singlehandedly
           | revolutionize the engineering processes at most normal
           | companies in the world.
        
       | RcouF1uZ4gsC wrote:
       | Thor: Love and Thunder - Feel free to run and pee whenever you
       | want.
        
         | mikestew wrote:
         | My wife rented it for the plane on a solo trip. She got back,
         | but the Apple TV progress bar in "Watch Now" indicated she'd
         | only watched about 30 minutes of it. "Sucked bad", she said,
         | "but maybe I just wasn't in the mood for it." We paid for it, I
         | like Portman, I like Hemsworth, I liked the previous
         | installments. I decided to watch the trailer to see if I wanted
         | to watch the whole thing.
         | 
         | I _just_ barely made it to the end of the trailer. I can only
         | imagine the steaming pile that was the whole movie.
        
           | all2 wrote:
           | This makes me sad. Thor: Ragnorak was hysterical and probably
           | my favorite Marvel movie so far. Maybe the old adage about
           | the third movie being better than the second will hold true.
        
             | tedunangst wrote:
             | L&T is the fourth Thor movie. Definitely the worst
             | according to Lucas logic.
        
               | aidenn0 wrote:
               | Really? I thought TPM was the strongest of the prequels;
               | AotC was by far the worst.
        
               | all2 wrote:
               | The original StarWars trilogy flipped this, too. In my
               | mind _Empire Strikes Back_ was literally the best of the
               | originals.
        
               | aidenn0 wrote:
               | I think there is broad agreement that _Empire_ is the
               | best of the originals. The other two trillogies seem to
               | have a much wider variety of opinions.
        
         | xupybd wrote:
         | I agree it was over the top and expect international audiences
         | to hate it. It is saturated with Kiwi humor, thanks to Taika.
         | As a Kiwi I got the jokes but found there was too much of it
         | for a Marvel movie.
        
         | aidenn0 wrote:
         | My wife liked it better than Ragnarok. Nobody else in the
         | family rated it better than "mediocre"
        
           | Firmwarrior wrote:
           | Man, I'm shocked people didn't like it
           | 
           | It was one of my favorite Marvel movies. I was on the edge of
           | my seat and/or laughing uproariously the whole time
           | 
           | I'd say it proves I just don't have any taste, but you'd
           | think that applies to anyone intentionally watching comic
           | book movies..
        
             | aidenn0 wrote:
             | I think that Waititi dialed the silliness up just a bit too
             | much for most people. For everyone else, it's probably
             | great.
        
         | carabiner wrote:
         | Thanks.
        
         | racl101 wrote:
         | lol.
         | 
         | Especially the parts with Thor.
        
         | gw99 wrote:
         | This is by far the funniest and most accurate thing I've seen
         | here. The whole film was absolute garbage.
        
       | [deleted]
        
       | racl101 wrote:
       | I forwent popcorn and soda for Avengers Endgame cause I didn't
       | wanna get up to go to the bathroom. Just took tiny sips of water
       | when my mouth got dry.
       | 
       | Worked like a charm.
        
         | metadat wrote:
         | Unless your body is already quite dehydrated, this strategy
         | will be hit-or-miss on it's own.
         | 
         | Improvenent is possibe by combining the above with relieving
         | yourself immediately before the performance begins.
         | 
         | If you relieve immediately beforehand and can't hold it for 90
         | minutes, there is likely a medical issue (e.g. old man,
         | pregnant, etc).
        
           | LeoPanthera wrote:
           | > If you relieve immediately beforehand and can't hold it for
           | 90 minutes, there is likely a medical issue (e.g. old man, or
           | pregnant).
           | 
           | Avengers Endgame is 3 hours and 1 minute long.
           | 
           | Some of that is credits, and maybe you should be able to hold
           | it for 3 hours anyway, but some people do have medical
           | problems. They should still be allowed to enjoy movies.
        
             | robertlagrant wrote:
             | > but some people do have medical problems. They should
             | still be allowed to enjoy movies.
             | 
             | I never understand statements like this. You're replying to
             | someone who already mentioned the former statement, and
             | didn't say anything about the latter.
        
               | theonething wrote:
               | lack of reading comprehension or comprehension in
               | general.
        
             | metadat wrote:
             | I wonder why the theaters won't incorporate a 5 minute
             | intermission break for movies longer than 2h:20m (140
             | minutes, on the higher end for typical films).
        
               | Yizahi wrote:
               | When I watched Return of the King in a theater they had
               | 10 or 15 min break in the middle, it was the first and
               | last time I've seen such arrangement. It would be nice if
               | Hollywood finally accepted such format and just went with
               | 3-4 hour long movies with a break. Not for all movies of
               | course, but at least for the more complex ones. I mean
               | not making 2:30 long movie and then just pad it with
               | irrelevant, often static scenes for some "Complete Movie
               | Of the Year Directors Super Duper Cut Edition" clocking
               | at 3:00, but having zero new content as compared to
               | theater cut. That's just a dumb trend imho. But instead
               | actually plan the story for 3 or 4 hours, with a proper
               | increase of storytelling, characters and so on. Just for
               | some top AAA movies.
        
               | Firmwarrior wrote:
               | My video game clan takes hourly bathroom/stretch breaks,
               | since we're all in our 30s and 40s. It's pretty great
        
               | toast0 wrote:
               | Intermissions feel dated. But when I saw Ben-Hur at the
               | fathom event, boy did I need it!
        
           | mprovost wrote:
           | "The length of a film should be directly related to the
           | endurance of the human bladder." - Alfred Hitchcock
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2022-10-25 23:01 UTC)