[HN Gopher] A Quantum Computer by Blasting It with the Fibonacci...
___________________________________________________________________
A Quantum Computer by Blasting It with the Fibonacci Sequence
Author : tambourine_man
Score : 40 points
Date : 2022-10-20 10:27 UTC (3 days ago)
(HTM) web link (gizmodo.com)
(TXT) w3m dump (gizmodo.com)
| dr_dshiv wrote:
| Golden ratios are mathematically useful for non-interference. Phi
| (golden ratio) is sometimes referred to as the "most" irrational
| number." Two waves with that ratio will never have their peaks
| and troughs line up. Ie, they don't synchronize. Contrast that
| with a harmonic or integer ratio. Neuroscientists have found high
| and low theta waves (for instance) that are separated by a phi
| ratio -- they propose that this ratio prevents interference and
| allows multiplexing.
|
| Somehow, these pulses helped prevent coupling to the environment?
| jazzyjackson wrote:
| Similar to how primes show up in nature, e.g. cicada broods
| maturing at 11, 13, and 17 year cycles - they are less likely
| to compete with other broods this way, a natural optimization
| of avoidance.
| OscarCunningham wrote:
| Consecutive entries in the Fibonacci sequence have a ratio
| close to ph, _and_ no common factors.
| i_like_apis wrote:
| Oh my, that's a lot of mobile ads in your face while trying to
| read an inch of content. I don't think I will be clicking mobile
| Gizmodo again.
|
| What happened in the article though?
| hbogert wrote:
| Did gizmodo dumb this down so much it becomes impossible to
| understand?
|
| Is it really the fibonacci sequence being a true missing link
| here? Or does the pattern just need to be pseudo random and/or
| increasing?
|
| /edit
|
| seems I read a bit too fast. They do explain why the Fibonacci
| word/sequence is better.
|
| > You can think of the Fibonacci sequence laser pulses as two
| frequencies that never overlap. That makes the pulses a
| quasicrystal: a pattern that has order, but no periodicity.
| OscarCunningham wrote:
| I suspect it might have been the Fibonacci word
| (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fibonacci_word).
| legohead wrote:
| > but the team ended the experiment at the 5.5-second mark
|
| why end it and not see how long it would last? and did they just
| do this once and call it a success? I'm no expert in this field
| by any means, but I just don't get this methodology. hopefully
| someone can enlighten me.
| pixelpoet wrote:
| Mangled headline
| chatterhead wrote:
| Complexity creates stability.
|
| So we live at the mercy of paradox.
|
| Yeah, that sounds about right from my experiences.
| anthk wrote:
| Learn about atractors.
| Syzygies wrote:
| The Fibonacci sequence is characterized by satisfying the
| simplest recurrence relation, just as the exponential function is
| characterized by satisfying the simplest differential equation.
|
| It's hard to think clearly about anything when there's enough
| cultural static in the way. Did you first learn of Bruce
| Springsteen after his Time and Newsweek covers? Here, Fibonacci
| numbers and the Golden Ratio enjoy a cult status that many
| including myself find repellent. To have original thoughts I want
| to avoid group think.
|
| Nevertheless, Fibonacci numbers are like the prime "2". Life
| depends on properties of the element carbon, and other elements
| don't enjoy the same evolutionary success. I ask myself why a
| simple sensor pattern for digital photography that my father came
| up with half a century ago is still in use? The game "Core Wars"
| ended when a virus kept winning. Simplest answers often have an
| uncanny effectiveness.
|
| Here, as an aging mathematician, I believe that this article
| could be reporting on an effect that's real.
| 0xTJ wrote:
| The modified headline on here doesn't make any sense.
|
| Also, this article doesn't seem amazing; it seems simplified to
| the point of being misleading, and it's not clear in the article
| what is meant by making it "work".
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2022-10-23 23:02 UTC)