[HN Gopher] Review of the Kinesis Advantage360 Professional
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Review of the Kinesis Advantage360 Professional
        
       Author : farslan
       Score  : 72 points
       Date   : 2022-10-22 18:57 UTC (4 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (arslan.io)
 (TXT) w3m dump (arslan.io)
        
       | perrylaj wrote:
       | I entertained buying the advantage (maybe 2?) before ultimately
       | buying a keyboardio model 1. The main things I didn't like about
       | the advantage was the fixed geometry and small/awkward function
       | keys. Had this been out, it would have been strongly considered,
       | looks like it addressed my primary concerns.
       | 
       | That said, I loved the keyboardio so much that I recently
       | received the updated model 100, and love it more than the
       | original. The hot swappable switches are great, and the layout is
       | really efficient for me (admittedly, took a frustrating few weeks
       | to get proficient).
       | 
       | Knowing what I do now, I'd personally choose the keyboardio 100
       | over the kinesis 360, but I'm glad there is another flexible high
       | quality split kb on the market.
        
         | danieldk wrote:
         | I recently switched to the Advantage 2 (after trying the Kyria,
         | Ferris, and Freestyle Edge). And now I feel that there is no
         | way back after having experienced the Advantage's key wells.
         | They are just fantastic. So, I think from now on, the Advantage
         | 2/360, Dactyl, and perhaps Glove80 are the only options for me.
         | 
         | I don't really use function keys, but if I did, I'd just map
         | them to the second layer.
        
         | ttarr wrote:
         | Hi, Can you please tell me if the fun key (big roundish key)
         | gets in the way when typing?
         | 
         | I really want one, but I'm not sure, I like resting my palm
         | when typing.
         | 
         | Also, are the wells well curved/deep? I can't tell from static
         | images on the web.
         | 
         | Thanks.
        
       | nixlim wrote:
       | I used kinesis advantage for about two months. Ended switching to
       | Ultimate Hacking Keyboard and have never been happier - haven't
       | switched the keyboard since - about 4 years now. Coding on
       | Kinesis was just such a pain in terms of usual keys - braces et
       | all: weird, up down arrows: weird. I thought I would adjust after
       | two months, but did not happen for me. YMMV
        
       | ZeroGravitas wrote:
       | The base has little screwholes, one on each half. Are they for a
       | camera tripod style mount?
        
       | sickcodebruh wrote:
       | I've been an Advantage user for almost eight years and I can't
       | imagine using anything else. I type with it on my lap and it
       | feels perfectly comfortable so I probably won't rush to buy this
       | model. But if I did, the portability would be an immediate win.
       | The original Advantage is massive and its comfortable typing
       | shape makes for an awkward size in backpacks. This would be a
       | huge win for any Advantage user who likes to work from different
       | desks.
        
       | firefoxkekw wrote:
       | Finally a split keyboard that looks professional, I been using
       | the Ergodox EZ for a while and thanks to you I'm going to switch
       | to the Advantage 360.
       | 
       | The official adoption of ZMK is a total win.
        
       | brenainn wrote:
       | Looks good! A customizable split keyboard was one of the better
       | investments I've made recently. No more hand pain after my work
       | day.
       | 
       | Retail options like the Kinesis and Moonlander are perfectly fine
       | products, but there is also an abundance of (typically open-
       | source) keyboard designs these days:
       | 
       | https://github.com/diimdeep/awesome-split-keyboards
       | 
       | https://golem.hu/boards/
       | 
       | Note that anything that runs QMK and Pro Micro MCUs can generally
       | be made wireless using ZMK and nice!nano MCUs.
       | 
       | Be warned that it's a deep rabbit hole. Personally I use and
       | really enjoy the TBK Mini:
       | 
       | https://github.com/Bastardkb/TBK-Mini
        
         | Symbiote wrote:
         | I have a fork / remix of your first link, putting everything
         | (and more) into a gallery view.
         | 
         | https://aposymbiont.github.io/split-keyboards/
        
         | orangepurple wrote:
         | This post might nerd snipe you and destroy your life. Stop
         | reading here. Keyboards are a rabbit hole but I spent at least
         | a week of my life searching and trying out existing optimized
         | layouts. Then I got fed up and tried to optimize my own
         | keyboard layouts on my own corpora. All this snowballed once I
         | realized how massive the ergonomic and RSI problems with QWERTY
         | are.
        
           | danieldk wrote:
           | I went down the rabbit hole and came out realizing that the
           | Kinesis Advantage2 is just a fantastic allround ergonomic
           | keyboard. Kinesis has been at it for 25-30 years and seem to
           | have a good idea of the trade-offs and have found an
           | (probably local) optimum.
           | 
           | I still like building keyboards as a hobby, it's a lot of fun
           | (but expensive). But none have felt so good so far as the
           | Advantage (which felt great from day one).
           | 
           | I'd love to buy a 360, but the price is a bit steep...
        
         | orangepurple wrote:
         | If you pay attention to builds and commentary on them after
         | completion a lot of people begrudgingly dislike the Dactyl
         | Manuform layout because it is uncomfortable for them and awful
         | to type on. That said I never tried one myself. Just be careful
         | and don't assume it's automatically going to be good for you! I
         | think the layout is parametric but who knows exactly how to
         | adjust the parameters?
        
           | badlucklottery wrote:
           | > a lot of people begrudgingly dislike the Dactyl Manuform
           | layout because it is uncomfortable for them and awful to type
           | on
           | 
           | Part of this is just the nature of ergonomic keyboards. Each
           | one is usually solving a set of _very_ specific ergonomic
           | problems. If you don 't have that set of problems it can be
           | either a lateral move or even a regression in your
           | comfort/pain level.
           | 
           | My wrists are _fucked_ up from years of skateboarding and
           | mountain biking. Going to curved key wells helped me a lot
           | because it lets me freeze my wrists in a comfortable position
           | and still hit keys far from the home row. And having a fully
           | split keyboard helps me find those comfortable wrist
           | positions easier. With those requirements, a split Dactyl was
           | a good choice and worked out well for me.
        
           | fsociety wrote:
           | That was my experience. I went from an ergodox to a dactyl
           | manuform and at first I found it great. But that went to good
           | to decent. I did not jive with something about the curvature
           | + layout, even though I could touch type at a good speed.
           | 
           | I ended up switching to a moonlander and find it is more
           | enjoyable. I also found it an improvement over the ergodox,
           | because the clusters are more thought out and the tenting has
           | less degrees of freedom so is easier to get just right.
        
       | jzb wrote:
       | I just want a fresh supply of the old Microsoft Natural Ergonomic
       | keyboards from the late 90s/early 2000s, before they started
       | using chiclet keys or mushy switches. (The model with a USB and
       | PS/2 option.)
        
       | pyrolistical wrote:
       | I couldn't get used to this layout for programming.
       | 
       | I'm all for moving the modifiers but I couldn't deal with moving
       | of `, =, [, ]
        
         | least wrote:
         | It's mostly a matter of discipline to not run back to what
         | you're comfortable with to get used to unusual layouts. They
         | _will_ become second nature to you if you use them long enough.
         | 
         | I am not suggesting that you _must_ do this, mind you. Just
         | that you almost certainly could get used to it if you forced
         | yourself to. The benefits of doing so may not be worthwhile,
         | though.
        
       | LAC-Tech wrote:
       | I'd like to try a split keyboard, but I'm just going to come out
       | and say it - I like numpads. I have mine set up to snap windows
       | to different parts of the screen, and it's great.
       | 
       | For whatever reason, moving my hand across a large keyboard
       | feels... fine. More comfortable than pressing multiple modifier
       | keys.
        
         | jrockway wrote:
         | Numpad is essential if you use software that takes advantage of
         | it, like Blender.
         | 
         | I made a split keyboard that put the num pad in the middle
         | since that space is normally wasted, but it wasn't very nice to
         | use. Neither of your hands appear from your gut, which is where
         | it would need to be to use the number pad comfortably (and
         | that's why traditional keyboards put off to one side). I just
         | chord to get the number pad keys now.
         | 
         | There are probably keyboards that put the number pad on your
         | left. That might be the perfect match for a right-handed mouse
         | user. (Left-handed mouse users have been happy for decades, I
         | bet.)
        
       | newaccount2021 wrote:
        
       | fbdab103 wrote:
       | No function keys is a complete deal breaker for me. I do not care
       | about layers or whatever ergonomic arguments that arise. I want
       | to be able to mash F5 and start the debugger whenever I need it.
       | 
       | Also, $439 is a very stiff price. I thought my Freestyle Pro at
       | ~$150 was already luxurious.
        
         | farslan wrote:
         | OP here. The function keys can be accessed via the FN layer.
         | I've added new keymap images where you can see each individual
         | layer. The old Advantage2's FN keys were not good, so they get
         | rid of it. If you start using layers, you'll see that most key
         | combos or keys are not actually that useful.
        
         | orangepurple wrote:
         | Layout layers are the future. Mapping more than three keys per
         | finger is unergonomic. You want to switch between layers
         | quickly with modifier keys actuated by your thumb. With this
         | approach you can ergonomically access 204 symbols (34 (pads) *
         | 3 (layers) * 2 (shift)) with 34 keys.
         | 
         | Heck even three pads per finger is too much imo and I need to
         | devote more research into two pad per finger layouts which rely
         | on multi-pad press combos (stenography) to avoid using the
         | bottom row and pinkies.
         | 
         | Till then you'll probably catch me using MTGAP 30 on an ANSI.
        
         | cbm-vic-20 wrote:
         | The keyboard's firmware is very flexible- you can remap all of
         | the keys, and also do things like "mod tap" or "layer tap"- for
         | example, when I tap the backspace key (one of the thumb
         | buttons), it sends a backspace. If I hold the key down, it puts
         | they keyboard into a layout where I can more easily access the
         | symbols used commonly in programming. I have the delete key
         | (which is next to it in the thumb cluster) act as an extra Ctrl
         | key when held down.
         | 
         | https://zmk.dev/docs/behaviors/hold-tap
        
         | least wrote:
         | There's enough keys (including ones that aren't even really
         | mapped) on the Advantage 360 Pro that you could use as a
         | dedicated f5 key.
        
         | jcpst wrote:
         | I used to feel the same. So when I was looking for some relief
         | and an ergonomic layout, I picked the X-Bows. It has fn keys
         | and was a nice introduction into the non-standard layouts. It
         | made a big difference for me.
         | 
         | Then I picked up a keyboardio atreus. It took me a few weeks to
         | get comfortable with it. But now using layers feels natural- I
         | don't have to leave the home row!
         | 
         | Having an F5 foot pedal would be fun...
        
         | platz wrote:
         | have you ever tried to mash F5 on the old kinesis advantage2
         | without looking
        
       | Findecanor wrote:
       | The Advantage360 feels like Kinesis' answer to the DIY _Dactyl_
       | keyboard -- which has a Kinesis-like layout, but which you would
       | have to download, 3D-print, build and solder yourself. Being
       | open-source (parametric SCAD), there are also a bunch of derived
       | designs out there.
       | 
       | <https://github.com/adereth/dactyl-keyboard>
       | 
       | There is a PCB kit for the Dactyl to reduce the amount of
       | handwiring:
       | 
       | <https://bastardkb.com/product/flexible-pcb/>
        
       | aliqot wrote:
       | I use an ergodox, and while kinesis comes so highly recommended,
       | there is always something about their design aesthetic that rubs
       | me the wrong way, like the uncanny valley between utility and
       | nintendo powerglove.
        
       | Labo333 wrote:
       | I got the Kinesis Advantage2 last year. I got used to it, almost
       | reaching my laptop typing speed. But I actually don't find it
       | super comfortable.
       | 
       | To be honest, no keyboard matches the comfort of my macbook with
       | the keyboard being under the level of the palms.
       | 
       | I also more recently got the keychron K3 (low profile) and
       | realized that the thing I don't like in the KA2 is my wrists
       | being locked.
       | 
       | I think it's not enough to consider a keyboard without a complete
       | setup, including where the hands / arms will rest and where the
       | mouse is positioned.
       | 
       | For example even the distance of my laptop stand makes a huge
       | difference because it affects how far my keyboard can be from my
       | torso, hence whether where my arms rest on the table.
        
       | wahnfrieden wrote:
       | Glove80 is the leading current closest competitor for the 360
       | imo, main diff being low profile v1 kalis
       | 
       | http://xahlee.info/kbd/glove80_keyboard.html
        
       | crazygringo wrote:
       | There are exactly three main things ergonomic keyboards need in
       | order to be correctly ergonomic:
       | 
       | 1) Split (so the distance is adjustable for your body, depending
       | on your shoulder width)
       | 
       | 2) Two axes of adjustable tilt (sides tented down, far side
       | angled down)
       | 
       | 3) Palm rests for when not typing
       | 
       | It's shocking to me how many ergonomic keyboards get the first
       | two wrong -- they're not split, and/or the axes aren't adjustable
       | at all or only one is.
       | 
       | This keyboard is split (yay!) but appears to be adjustable only
       | along one axis (boo).
        
         | nextos wrote:
         | Any recommendations for a keyboard that does everything well?
         | 
         | I have found Microsoft Sculpt to be pretty decent. In
         | particular, it has negative tilt which I think is the most
         | ergonomic option. Build quality is not very good, though. And I
         | would prefer a wired option for a lower latency. Also, I have
         | heard they are no longer produced and they are just selling
         | stocked items. Interestingly, I do not dislike their shallow
         | keyswitches. I find them much less tiring in the long run, and
         | I type much faster.
        
           | tomduncalf wrote:
           | If my Sculpt dies and I can't replace it (a useful thing to
           | know is they have a 3 year warranty, in the UK at least, so
           | when a key inevitably fell off my last one I was able to get
           | it replaced for free! I didn't realise the warranty was this
           | long previously and just bought another), I might try the
           | Logitech K860. Looks nice, though I'd rather not have the num
           | pad.
           | 
           | This Advantage360 looks pretty great but I wonder how easy it
           | will be to ship to the UK, when I last looked into these more
           | bespoke keyboards it was a bit of a hassle and increased the
           | price significantly.
        
           | ideamotor wrote:
           | A keyboard tray would offer the additional axis of tilt. But
           | my keyboard tray's depth does not fit my kinesis advantage2
           | and I doubt it would fit this. And I bought the largest tray
           | I could find.
        
             | wahnfrieden wrote:
             | mount them on adjustable mic grips/extenders to your chair
             | or desk
        
         | User23 wrote:
         | Another obvious thing that few keyboards get right is to use
         | the thumb in opposition to the fingers. Practically that means
         | chords should involve the thumb and another finger. The Kinesis
         | thumb keys aren't bad for this.
         | 
         | Anyone wanting to design a keyboard or even just remap an
         | existing one should read John Napier's excellent book Hands[1].
         | 
         | [1] https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/1082840.Hands
        
         | tazjin wrote:
         | All three of these are dwarfed by key wells (i.e. do the keys
         | sit in an indentation, or do you have to tilt your wrists
         | upwards?) for me. It's always subjective.
        
           | crazygringo wrote:
           | No, it's not subjective at all.
           | 
           | It's actually entirely objective, in terms of the amount of
           | tension you need to hold in the muscles connected to your
           | shoulders, elbows, and wrists. You're looking to maintain a
           | neutral position in all of those, to minimize tension there.
           | There's nothing subjective whatsoever about that, tension is
           | very observable.
           | 
           | Second, I would very much push back on key wells for the
           | general population. Adjustable tilt forwards on a flat
           | keyboard achieves everything you need for neutral wrist
           | position and relaxed fingers, so that you're always typing
           | slightly "downwards". Key wells try to accomplish a weird
           | goal of holding your arms/hands in a fixed position and
           | typing with just your fingers, instead of typing with your
           | whole arm floating in an integrated shoulder-to-fingertip
           | movement. If you have some kind of arm movement
           | problem/disability then concave wells might be the best
           | solution, but for the general population the wells are _more_
           | awkward to use in the upper rows of keys, increasing the
           | forearm tension which controls the fingers. (As a general
           | rule, tension is usually minimized overall by distributing
           | work across as many muscles as possible that involve longer
           | muscle trains, rather than localizing work in shorter areas.
           | That, for example, is why people say to lift with your back,
           | not with your arms.)
        
             | tazjin wrote:
             | This is why I'm telling you this is subjective, as much as
             | you'd like to reduce it to some "objective" criteria. I
             | broke my wrist a few years ago, and since then typing on
             | anything without key wells is a bad idea.
             | 
             | I've seen too much advice like yours leading to people with
             | some specific problem going "but I'm doing everything
             | _correctly_ , how am I still experiencing problems?!".
        
       | gtsteve wrote:
       | This looks excellent, but I was hoping for something other than
       | Bluetooth.
       | 
       | I have sworn by Logitech wireless accessories for years because
       | of their integrated wireless which presents to the OS as a
       | regular USB device driver, so I can use the accessories in BIOS,
       | during OS installations, etc without any hassle.
       | 
       | I also like the Logitech USB dongles because I find the Windows
       | Bluetooth keyboard support to be very much a second class
       | citizen, with slow performance and the keyboad noticeably lags
       | both randomly and when the system is under load, unlike a USB
       | device.
       | 
       | This got me wondering if there was some solution for this, such
       | as having a Bluetooth keyboard communicate with another piece of
       | hardware that replayed the inputs as USB. Or perhaps Windows has
       | upped their game in the couple of years since I last tried a
       | Bluetooth keyboard?
       | 
       | I know on Mac it just works (tm) but sadly I cannot escape
       | Windows at work at the moment.
        
         | azinman2 wrote:
         | Sounds like you can always just plug it in as well. I've heard
         | lots of stories of the Logitech stuff causing interference (I
         | think it's 2.4ghz IIRC?), and then you also need a dongle. I
         | understand your windows needs (versus say a laptop), but why
         | not just be wired when you need to access the bios?
        
       | alxlu wrote:
       | I've been enjoying this keyboard a lot as well. Unfortunately, it
       | seems to randomly keep waking up my MacBook every several minutes
       | and the only fix I've been able to find is to manually turn the
       | switch off when I'm done using the computer.
       | 
       | I'm also not a huge fan of having to charge both sides
       | individually although so far the battery life seems quite good. I
       | don't move my computer often and use a dock so it would be nice
       | to be able to just leave it plugged in without worrying about
       | battery, but doing that requires both sides to each have a cable
       | plugged into a power source.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2022-10-22 23:00 UTC)