[HN Gopher] The Moorish invention that tamed Spain's mountains
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       The Moorish invention that tamed Spain's mountains
        
       Author : mjul
       Score  : 121 points
       Date   : 2022-10-16 06:53 UTC (16 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.bbc.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.bbc.com)
        
       | bell-cot wrote:
       | The article is about some low-tech but historically effective
       | water-management techniques, brought to Spain by the Muslim
       | conquest (711-721). It walks back very quickly on the headline's
       | claim of "invention". And mentions that similar techniques were
       | independently invented in other parts of the world.
       | 
       | Note: "Moor" is both a wretchedly vague exonym, and often a mild
       | ethnic slur.
        
         | usrusr wrote:
         | I only know the region as a repeat tourist (just came back from
         | my second visit this year), but my impression from this is that
         | locals are quite proud of their cosmopolitan past and "moro" is
         | the simply term they use for their melting pot ancestors of
         | that era. Nothing negative about it at all.
        
           | justnah wrote:
           | >but my impression from this is that locals are quite proud
           | of their cosmopolitan past and "moro"
           | 
           | Literally no one is.
           | 
           | There is a vast difference between giving credit for a given
           | concept/tool/technique because it's useful, and thinking the
           | locals have sort of ancestral connection with a foreign
           | invader.
        
             | jvican wrote:
             | Don't speak for a whole country. There are people that are
             | proud of this heritage, like me, and many more, especially
             | in the places where Moorish culture had a stronghold (e.g.
             | Andalusia, C. Valenciana, Murcia, etc.)
        
               | elnatro wrote:
               | There is only Muslim/Moor heritage in Architecture and
               | language.
               | 
               | There is no "heritage" in customs ir culture.
        
               | asabil wrote:
               | I find it hard to believe that there would be no cultural
               | heritage after ~700 years.
               | 
               | What I think you want to say is that the "identity" of
               | modern Spain and Portugal has been shaped and defined by
               | its opposition to the moor/muslim/north-african identity.
        
               | spookie wrote:
               | I do disagree with your last sentence, a lot of
               | Portuguese are proud of their north-african connections.
               | Most families come from "newly-christians" after all (and
               | you gotta blame Spain's Phillips for that one).
        
               | asabil wrote:
               | I have to admit that I included Portugal without giving
               | it much thought.
               | 
               | I was honestly mostly thinking about Spain and added
               | Portugal assuming they would be the same from the
               | perspective of identity. I stand corrected.
        
               | elnatro wrote:
               | Granada was dominated by the Moors for 700 years. The
               | rest of the Spain (and Portugal) wasn't.
               | 
               | Later Medieval-era Spanish identity was anti-Moor but not
               | always was the case. Keep in mind that the country of
               | Spain did not exit until the 1500s.
        
           | throwawaybutwhy wrote:
           | Last name of Matamoros (kills moors) is a thing, and the
           | banner of Santiago defined the nation for centuries.
        
             | [deleted]
        
       | Turing_Machine wrote:
       | The Native Americans in Arizona had developed something similar,
       | long before Europeans showed up.
       | 
       | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arizona_bajada_canals
        
       | drooopy wrote:
       | *Moopish invention
        
         | yucky wrote:
         | ^Came here for this, so thank you ;)
         | 
         | For anybody that wants to go down a very interesting rabbit
         | hole start here:
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moorish_Science_Temple_of_Amer...
         | and wander as needed. Would also recommend the related mystery
         | of this man:
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wallace_Fard_Muhammad.
        
       | pazimzadeh wrote:
       | Is this more similar to the spring-flow tunnel, or the Persian
       | qanat?
       | 
       | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qanat#Qanat_vs._spring-flow_tu...
        
       | noduerme wrote:
       | These are cool. One of these gravity-driven miniature aqueducts
       | still flows from the Sierra Nevada directly between Plaza Larga
       | and las Pesas at one of the highest points in the Albaycin in
       | Granada, and (I've heard) is accessible through the basements of
       | the buildings there. It's extremely impressive that someone
       | engineered running water to a hill that high from an even higher
       | source miles away across deep ravines, and that it still flows.
        
         | [deleted]
        
       | zeristor wrote:
       | I don't know why I find water harvesting so fascinating, nifty
       | use of aquifers.
       | 
       | There was a civilisation in the Sahara that had tunnels in the
       | mountain that provided water, I imagine they ran dry.
       | 
       | Persia had (has?) underground tunnels that convey water to
       | farmland.
       | 
       | With the increasing amount of heavy rain fall I'm not sure how
       | much of that can be caught and sequestered.
       | 
       | This was made all the more apparent when there was a sudden
       | downpour in London some years back and the river Fleet, sewer as
       | it is now backed up into the office's canteen.
        
         | pfdietz wrote:
         | It wasn't in the Sahara, but the civilization at Petra (in what
         | is now SW Jordan) was built around sophisticated hydraulic
         | engineering.
         | 
         | It eventually collapsed when earthquakes damaged the system
         | beyond their capacity to repair. Being subjugated by Rome
         | didn't help.
         | 
         | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qSfFq02pK4s
        
         | User23 wrote:
         | > There was a civilisation in the Sahara that had tunnels in
         | the mountain that provided water, I imagine they ran dry.
         | 
         | Was that the Garamantes?[1]
         | 
         | [1] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Garamantes
        
       | zeristor wrote:
       | There must be hundreds of places around the world who could make
       | use of this.
       | 
       | How many other ones in Spain have been abandoned?
       | 
       | If this was established by the Moors then I would guess other ex-
       | Moor states would have a similar setup.
        
         | PaulDavisThe1st wrote:
         | The same system exists across parts of the north American
         | southwest colonized/taken over by the Spanish. New Mexico still
         | has many acqueias, though like Span, less and less each year as
         | the skills and desire to manage them, uhm, dries up.
        
         | asabil wrote:
         | Yes, throughout Morocco's south east you will find what's
         | called khettaras (khTr@). They are underground irrigation
         | network that was used to transport water from the Atlas
         | Mountains to regions about 300km away.They were in used until
         | the late 80s as far as I know.
        
           | tough wrote:
           | Wow fascinating, do you have any idea why they stopped being
           | used? Cynical me says to earn some kickback money for
           | building new industrial pipes..
        
             | LargoLasskhyfv wrote:
             | You mean like this?
             | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Man-Made_River
        
               | zeristor wrote:
               | No like this, Qanat:
               | 
               | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qanat
        
               | LargoLasskhyfv wrote:
               | I answered to the "cynincal me" part of tough
               | (industrial, kickback, etc) ;-)
        
             | lifeisstillgood wrote:
             | It seems to me that the acequia are an _open and
             | distributed_ technology, so even when the central authority
             | collapsed, each individual community was able to keep the
             | services running based on that technology, for over a
             | thousand years.
             | 
             | Modern irrigation is incredible, modern cities are amazing,
             | modern software connects most humans on the planet. But ...
             | we can learn.
        
               | asabil wrote:
               | That was the exact same with the khettaras, they were
               | built and Maintained by the communities.
               | 
               | Talking about notion of a central authority that provides
               | governance is an anachronism in the context of North
               | Africa. But that's a separate discussion.
        
             | asabil wrote:
             | Droughts, there is simply not as much water as there used
             | to be :(
        
         | krisoft wrote:
         | > If this was established by the Moors then I would guess other
         | ex-Moor states would have a similar setup.
         | 
         | Sure thing! In Madeira they have many ancient aquaducts
         | originally estabilished by the Moors:
         | 
         | https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Levada
         | 
         | Ancient water management is a fascinating topic.
         | 
         | The qanats in the middle-east, and north africa are
         | particularly interesting. They are underground water conduits
         | and sources dug by human muscles alone.
         | 
         | https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qanat
        
           | jdasdf wrote:
           | The moors were never in madeira.
           | 
           | The island chain was empty by the time the portuguese
           | arrived.
        
           | spookie wrote:
           | I really need to comment, even if others said the same thing.
           | 
           | There were no moors in Madeira.
        
           | rodelrod wrote:
           | Madeira was initially settled by the Portuguese in the 15th
           | century, 200 years after the end of the Portuguese
           | Reconquista, so it's quite a stretch to claim that the
           | "levadas" were "established by the Moors", even if they
           | initially brought the technology to Iberia.
        
       | oceanplexian wrote:
       | I'm not sure why BBC finds it so fascinating that the Moors were
       | able to dig ditches and channel water through them 500 years
       | after the Romans had built highly advanced aqueducts in Spain
       | (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aqueduct_of_Segovia,
       | https://fascinatingspain.com/place-to-visit/the-best-of/the-...).
       | All I can guess is that some civilizations are more in vogue than
       | others. In fact when the Moors invaded Spain, they destroyed much
       | of the Roman infrastructure in a fit of religious fanaticism so a
       | great deal of it has been lost.
        
         | zymhan wrote:
         | This is specifically about channeling and storing water _in_
         | the ground, not piping it above the ground.
         | 
         | This also requires far less resources than building an
         | aqueduct.
        
         | nashashmi wrote:
         | Much to your dismay, Arabs never destroyed things with
         | religious fanaticism. They were mostly hands free and laid back
         | with the fewest rules for non-ruling communities, especially in
         | the early years of the expansion.
         | 
         | Instead what they did was build on top of existing stuff. The
         | Arabs didn't invent aqua ducts. They got it from other
         | civilizations. What Arabs did do was connect ideas from the
         | Greeks, Romans, Indians, North Africa, and sub sahara Africa.
         | And because they were laid back with the fewest rules, lot more
         | innovation and mashing of ideas occurred during this period.
         | 
         | this was in contrast to the Roman Catholic Church which was
         | more domineering and controlling to a fault.
         | 
         | Search youtube for "how Islam saved western civilization" for a
         | rundown. The library in Spain was a collection of all the great
         | European works until Europe awokened in the Renaissance which
         | was built off of the works Arabs had continued.
        
         | Daishiman wrote:
         | I'm not sure why you doing a whatabout to the Romans
         | contributes to the conversation.
        
         | dsmnd wrote:
         | are theses acequias roman in origin as well?
         | https://www.uv.es/cuadernosgeo/CG15_001_024.pdf
        
         | ghostDancer wrote:
         | They solve different problems. And every culture usually builds
         | over the ones before them. And the Romans were gone several
         | hundreds of years before the Moors conquered Spain and their
         | infrastructures were already decaying or had disappeared, no
         | religious fanaticism there.
        
         | ignoramous wrote:
         | > _in a fit of religious fanaticism_
         | 
         | Umayyids (the "Syrians" who conquered Spain) and _religious
         | fanaticism_ don 't go hand in hand: Most Umayyid rulers were
         | political nihilists at best.
         | 
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Umayyad_Caliphate#Legacy
        
           | contingencies wrote:
           | Furthermore my understanding is they ushered in an amazing
           | era of translation and learning where great state resources
           | were directed to supporting linguistic, cultural and
           | pedagogical achievement and were explicitly pluralistic in
           | terms of state policy on the religions of their subjects.
           | (Source: BBC video series on the Moorish period)
           | 
           | Compare Spain today; you can barely get around without being
           | fed _jamon_. My understanding is that historically there was
           | actually a purposeful, vindictive re-introduction of pork in
           | to (nearly all) Spanish food to  "flush out" any Muslims in
           | hiding after the Moorish period and this culture of ham-in-
           | everything has basically continued to the present. (Source:
           | Traveling with a Muslim in Spain)
        
             | AlecSchueler wrote:
             | Wow, I'd love to read more about this if you have any
             | sources.
             | 
             | I visited Spain as a vegetarian a few years ago and I found
             | the pork thing so weird. I'd go into a random bar and ask
             | for a beer then they'd give it to me with a plate of
             | sausages on the side without mentioning it or asking first!
        
             | sobkas wrote:
             | > Furthermore my understanding is they ushered in an
             | amazing era of translation and learning where great state
             | resources were directed to supporting linguistic, cultural
             | and pedagogical achievement and were explicitly pluralistic
             | in terms of state policy on the religions of their
             | subjects. (Source: BBC video series on the Moorish period)
             | 
             | > Compare Spain today; you can barely get around without
             | being fed jamon. My understanding is that historically
             | there was actually a purposeful, vindictive re-introduction
             | of pork in to (nearly all) Spanish food to "flush out" any
             | Muslims in hiding after the Moorish period and this culture
             | of ham-in-everything has basically continued to the
             | present. (Source: Traveling with a Muslim in Spain)
             | 
             | Jews were also victims of such dietary inquisition
             | (sometimes literally).
        
         | Maursault wrote:
         | > I'm not sure why BBC finds it so fascinating that the Moors
         | were able to dig ditches and channel water through them 500
         | years after the Romans had built highly advanced aqueducts in
         | Spain
         | 
         | I'm not sure why many think it is so fascinating the Romans
         | built aqueducts. The Etruscans built hydraulic works as
         | irrigation channels, drainage systems, dams, etc., while the
         | Greeks had also built similar hydraulic structures long before
         | Roman influence. And the Romans neither invented aqueducts nor
         | built the first aqueducts. The first sophisticated long-
         | distance raised conduit canal systems were constructed in the
         | Assyrian empire in the 9th century BCE, half a millennium
         | before the earliest Roman aqueducts.
        
           | fatherzine wrote:
           | > Romans had built highly advanced aqueducts /in Spain/
           | 
           | There were highly advanced aqueducts /in Spain/ long before
           | the Moors came along.
        
             | Maursault wrote:
             | > There were highly advanced aqueducts /in Spain/ long
             | before the Moors came along.
             | 
             | It is the _fallacy of simple location_ to try to pinpoint
             | concrete details in explicit segments of space and time. It
             | does not matter to Leibniz _where_ Newton discovered
             | calculus, only whether Newton did so _first_ by up to a
             | decade. It would be fallacy of simple location for Leibniz
             | to claim,  "but that was at Cambridge, not Paris." The
             | Romans can no more claim validly they were first in Spain
             | with the aqueduct than Leibniz can claim validly he was
             | first in Paris with the calculus.
        
         | throwawaygal7 wrote:
         | The romans used these systems extensively as well...
        
         | oa335 wrote:
         | Invading Muslim armies of that era typically left the major
         | infrastructure and economies, and even the lower levels of
         | political bureaucracies relatively intact. I'm interested in
         | the claim that "when the Moors invaded Spain, they destroyed
         | much of the Roman infrastructure in a fit of religious
         | fanaticism so a great deal of it has been lost," do you have
         | any sources for that?
        
       | cm2187 wrote:
       | How does that differ from ancien Rome's aqueducts?
        
         | Synaesthesia wrote:
         | They're canals which feed into underground aquifers which then
         | feed streams somewhere else.
        
         | alephxyz wrote:
         | Different time scales. Aqueducts are (mainly) used for
         | transporting water. These things are used to store springwater
         | in aquifers so that it slowly trickles out or can be pumped
         | during the dry season.
        
       | midislack wrote:
       | Kind of a low-tech or primative aquaduct.
        
       | narag wrote:
       | OK, I have nothing bad to say about acequias or irrigation.
       | Having grown up with a big orchad at home I enjoyed watching all
       | those water inventions. Not sure about "Moorish". More like
       | "muslim era" heritage?
       | 
       | "Making life possible in one of Europe's driest regions" is
       | misleading though.
       | 
       | Eastwards Sierra Nevada you find Almeria, where all the Spaghetti
       | Westerns were filmed. It's indeed a desertic zone, just not a
       | very big extension.
       | 
       | The hyperbolic headline somehow implies a scale that's not real.
       | In any other direction from Sierra Nevada, there's plenty of
       | rain, water and woods. That system just provides the same for
       | some villages on the drier zones.
       | 
       | Edit: OK, people disagree... so be it, but before downvoting, why
       | don't you take a look at Google Earth and see for yourself?
        
         | PaulDavisThe1st wrote:
         | New Mexico, one of the beneficaries of the acqueia system, is
         | even more of a "true" desert than Almeria, and yet it would
         | still not be wrong to say that the system helped make life
         | possible here. The population density just before the Spanish
         | arrived was not high, but it was lower than it was since they
         | bought this water management technique to the area.
         | 
         | Just because such a region does not have a city like Madrid or
         | even Albuquerque does not mean that people do not live there,
         | nor that they are not reliant to some extent on acqueias.
        
         | gumby wrote:
         | > Not sure about "Moorish".
         | 
         | IMHO this is one of the few reasonable uses of this term (which
         | has otherwise acquired a negative connotation). The Muslims who
         | colonized Iberia were referred to as Moors because of their
         | Maghreb origin (cf old Mauritania), which itself is the other,
         | technical, use of the term.
         | 
         | And given that it's the BBC I'd give them a pass for correct
         | usage, even if it's likely few in the audience will get it,
         | with many instead enjoying the derogatory implication.
        
         | otikik wrote:
         | You are simply wrong and are touching a sensitive point.
         | 
         | I grew up in Cordoba (which is west from Sierra Nevada). It
         | gets to 49 centigrades in the summer. It's not officially
         | considered "a desert"... but it will soon. Temperature has been
         | going up and rain went down. Fewer plants survive each summer.
         | 
         | This is a pattern that you see through all the Spanish south.
         | Desertification is a big, visible problem that should not be
         | minimized. I recommend that you apply your own advice to
         | yourself.
        
           | narag wrote:
           | _You are simply wrong_
           | 
           | So the headline is precise and I'm wrong when I say those
           | acequias can only provide water for small zones... and
           | because it's a "sensitive point", nobody can disagree.
           | 
           | Appaling.
        
             | otikik wrote:
             | Enjoy your orchids.
        
       | WalterBright wrote:
       | > All these customs are being lost and young people don't want to
       | know about it
       | 
       | I don't understand why this knowledge isn't being written down.
        
         | martyvis wrote:
         | It does seem like the perfect thing to be documented in a GIS.
         | Presumably you could even use high resolution satellite or
         | drone footage to automate much of the data collection.
         | Interview the caretakers in situ recording GPS locations and
         | times. Perfect project for colleges
        
           | WalterBright wrote:
           | I bought the Foxfire series of books written by students who
           | went around documenting the old rural ways before that was
           | all lost to time.
        
       | zeristor wrote:
       | There's a Dutch company called Groasis that had the nifty idea of
       | planting a tree that goes though a bucket of water, the bucket
       | slowly leaks water into the ground.
       | 
       | Groasis:
       | 
       | https://www.groasis.com/en/technology/how-does-the-reforesta...
       | 
       | The mass of the water provides thermal regulation as well as a
       | trickle of water, which can catch rain as well as being topped up
       | manually.
       | 
       | The overall goal is for the tree to grow down to the aquifer and
       | then thrive. It helps a lot if there's work to catch storm runoff
       | into the aquifer.
       | 
       | The OP is more about conveying water through the aquifer.
       | 
       | Edit: URL added
        
       | [deleted]
        
       | zeristor wrote:
       | "You must plant the rain before you plant a seed or tree!"
       | proclaimed rain farmer Mr. Zephaniah Phiri Maseko of Zimbabwe. By
       | doing just that, he and his family turned a wasteland into an
       | oasis, raised groundwater and well levels even in dry years,
       | reduced flooding in wet years, and enhanced the fertility of the
       | soils. This inspiring story will be shared along with the
       | strategies used, and more importantly, the guiding principles
       | that informed the choice, placement, and implementation of these
       | strategies into a more integrated and productive system. These
       | principles work in any climate experiencing a dry season or
       | drought. And they help us see and act more holistically by asking
       | us questions that direct our attention to important aspects of
       | water and fertility systems we might otherwise overlook.
       | 
       | https://youtube.com/watch?v=D6_WZ789lpM
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2022-10-16 23:02 UTC)