[HN Gopher] One trick Apple uses to make you think green bubbles...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       One trick Apple uses to make you think green bubbles are "gross"
        
       Author : allenwhsu
       Score  : 251 points
       Date   : 2022-10-12 13:29 UTC (9 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (uxdesign.cc)
 (TXT) w3m dump (uxdesign.cc)
        
       | scarface74 wrote:
       | What are the chances that the EU will come in a year and mandate
       | that "all messages must have the same color" and use it as an
       | excuse that having some blue bubbles and some green colors is
       | harming the mental health of children?
        
         | schroeding wrote:
         | Very slim, as this is appears to be a _very_ american problem.
         | It 's normal for teenagers (and people in general) to have an
         | Android phone in Europe. It isn't anymore in the US.
        
           | scarface74 wrote:
           | But yet, the EU is mandating the USB C "standard" without
           | going into details about which part of the standard is
           | required still requiring you to know whether the USB C cable
           | will actually transmit data and at what speed will it
           | transmit video (something that USB required iPads already do
           | and is a standard), etc
        
         | enragedcacti wrote:
         | The contrast between your perception of the EU and their actual
         | positions is pretty entertaining to me:
         | 
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_Markets_Act
         | 
         | https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2022/04/eu-digital-markets-act...
        
           | scarface74 wrote:
           | So you mean my perception that the EU is run by a bunch of
           | bureaucrats who don't understand technology, stymie
           | innovation and don't think about unintended consequences? Do
           | you think there may be a reason that hardly any successful
           | technology companies come out of the Eu?
        
             | enragedcacti wrote:
             | maybe 'perception' was the wrong word, moreso attacking
             | them on imagined grounds of legislating trivialities of
             | message color instead of commenting on the actual (highly
             | publicized) sweeping changes they are already making to
             | attempt to address the problem.
        
               | scarface74 wrote:
               | That worked out really well with the 99 section 11
               | chapter GDPR. All it got us was cookie consent banners.
        
               | enragedcacti wrote:
               | Have a good one
        
         | stjohnswarts wrote:
         | More than likely it would start in California. I say we start a
         | petition that the colors be indistinguishable. Be the change
         | that you want to see, I'm looking at the man in the mirror.
        
       | leobg wrote:
       | Also, I suspect the association of blue as modern and green as
       | outdated might also stem from LEDs. Early LEDs were green or red.
       | It took many years until blue LEDs became available, and those,
       | at first, were much more expensive.
        
       | samatman wrote:
       | Interesting that reducing contrast is the exact 'nudge' Hacker
       | News uses to inform us that a comment is less credible.
        
         | samatman wrote:
         | Although this comment leads me to think that either this has
         | changed in subsequent iOS releases, or the author has issues
         | with telling the truth:
         | 
         | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33178848
        
         | sangnoir wrote:
         | in HNs case, I suspect it's deliberately intended to lower
         | interaction with grayed out text (to avoid pile-ons and low-
         | quality/flamey discussions rooted on such comments)
        
       | jasonjamerson wrote:
       | I disagree with two things here. Green IS traditionally an off-
       | putting color, when we're talking about light: aliens, x-files,
       | goo, and everything witchy.
       | 
       | But in this context the thing that's harder on the eyes is the
       | bubble itself. So the lighter one is easier for me. Although I'd
       | rather see no bubbles at all.
        
         | 0898 wrote:
         | Texts have been green before iMessage came out though
        
         | Double_a_92 wrote:
         | Nature is green though...
        
           | jasonjamerson wrote:
           | That's why I said green light, which is unusual in nature.
           | Sure, it's a little green when it filters through leaves, but
           | that's very hard to perceive because the yellow of the sun or
           | the blue of the sky usually cancels that out. It's almost
           | never enough to light up another object with green.
        
         | martin_a wrote:
         | > Green IS traditionally an off-putting color
         | 
         | I don't think that's true for the reasons you put up.
         | 
         | Our eyes are specialized to distinct more shades of green from
         | each other than with other colors. That's a useful evolutionary
         | feature when you are an animal and have to hunt in the wild.
         | 
         | For humans that leads to the point that we're rather good in
         | picking "unnatural" shades of green (gooish ones and self-
         | emitting shades of green).
        
           | jasonjamerson wrote:
           | Absolutely, I'm referring to emission of green light, which
           | is unnatural.
        
       | viridian wrote:
       | As a counterpoint to everyone saying they've never heard of
       | anyone caring about the bubbles; back when I was in college my
       | fraternity sent out big group messages via iMessage only.
       | 
       | If you wanted to know about events and didn't have an iPhone, you
       | needed to check your email or hear about it second hand. No one
       | wanted to deal with broken MMS, formatting, etc, so that's how
       | things were handled.
       | 
       | Some folks with Android phones were annoyed, but the official
       | stance is that your email should be the place you check for this
       | stuff anyways.
        
       | jeremy0x4a wrote:
       | Whenever I see this iMessage/SMS, blue/green topic come up I
       | descend into an internal debate that, as I get older, I am
       | becoming increasingly familiar with.
       | 
       | The debate is that one where I am forced to reconcile whether I
       | am too far removed from popular culture to see how this is a real
       | issue versus accepting that the issue is entirely contrived.
        
         | colinmhayes wrote:
         | The green texts isn't just branding or aesthetics. iMessage
         | with non iphones is a legitimately degraded experience and the
         | green texts exist to remind you of that, but even if they
         | weren't green the experience would still be bad because apple
         | realizes that forcing people to buy their phone if they want to
         | have texts that send in under 5 seconds is an incredibly
         | successful strategy. Having long form conversations over SMS
         | just doesn't work given the time they take to send, and tons of
         | iPhone users refuse to get a messaging app.
        
         | d23 wrote:
         | It's a really really really short article. Really short.
         | Please.
         | 
         | It gets to the point in the second paragraph: the green bubbles
         | have bad contrast. It mentions the design of the green bubbles
         | rank as "very poor" by accessibility standards.
         | 
         | That's why it matters.
        
         | randomdata wrote:
         | The nice thing about getting even older is that you soon won't
         | care about such reconciliation.
        
           | jeremy0x4a wrote:
           | I appreciate this, but I will still cherish the joy of
           | yelling at the children on my lawn, as I slowly descend into
           | comfortable curmudgeonhood.
        
         | adrr wrote:
         | I would love to see a survey of mobile phone users to see if
         | this matters to them. I'll take a guess it doesn't matter
         | because Google would be flaunting the results.
         | 
         | As for negative effects on kids. There's more than just phones.
         | Clothes, cars, vacations, social media posts, tutoring, sports.
         | Maybe we should put everyone in uniforms, don't allow kids
         | drive to school, ban sports, and forbid them from talking about
         | their vacations. And everyone was equal.
        
           | OJFord wrote:
           | > I'll take a guess it doesn't matter because Google would be
           | flaunting the results.
           | 
           | I'm not sure how easy that would be - 'Apple will make you
           | more popular if you use an iPhone instead of Android!'...'No
           | no, that's _bad_ , you don't want that, _don 't_ buy an
           | iPhone!'
        
             | snazz wrote:
             | Google did an ad campaign recently that's basically that
             | line of thinking (plus trying to encourage them to adopt
             | RCS): https://www.android.com/get-the-message/
        
               | kaba0 wrote:
               | Obligatory addition: Google's version of RCS is just
               | built on top of an open standard but is hardly more open
               | then apple's imessage so adopting that is not a solution
               | either.
        
           | criddell wrote:
           | It matters to me a little bit. A green bubble means the
           | message is basically a postcard that the carrier can read. A
           | blue bubble means the message is in an envelope that my
           | carrier can't read.
        
           | thatguy0900 wrote:
           | My school had uniforms, bullying doesn't stop. Kids are
           | honestly just mean, and not idiots. You can dress a wealthy
           | kid and a poor kid in the same clothes and you will not fool
           | anyone in class about which one is the poor one.
        
             | threatofrain wrote:
             | But does it mitigate bullying? Going straight to "but
             | bullying doesn't stop" is an unconvincingly perfectionist
             | stance.
        
               | thatguy0900 wrote:
               | Not really, no. If a kid wants to bully you theyll find a
               | reason to do so. If you've ever been a third party
               | watching that stuff, you'll see what people are actually
               | being bullied for doesn't really make sense. Take away
               | the shoes and the phone and it will just be your hair or
               | your posture. Bullying is a targeted activity
        
         | idk1 wrote:
         | It's certainly an issue with a lot of teenagers. Speaking
         | broadly, social status and brands say a lot at that age, and
         | you could miss out on friends or social occasions based on it.
         | 
         | As an adult of course the green/blue bubbles simply don't
         | matter, we grow up and realise that, but it certainly is a
         | significant issue if it's affecting young peoples lives.
         | 
         | So I'd say it's somewhere inbetween what you descibe, perhaps a
         | bit contrived, but also could have a significant impact on some
         | people.
         | 
         | Side note - I have heard of people saying they won't date green
         | or blue bubble people, but of course if someone takes that
         | point of view as an adult then it's a good indicator to show
         | how they think.
        
           | milkytron wrote:
           | > It's certainly an issue with a lot of teenagers.
           | 
           | > As an adult of course the green/blue bubbles simply don't
           | matter
           | 
           | I disagree that the green/blue bubbles simply don't matter as
           | an adult. I've had friend groups not include me in group
           | messages because of it. Some have gotten visibly mad at me
           | for having green bubbles and "breaking their chat". There is
           | certain functionality that iPhones don't support in MMS chats
           | that Android phones do (like adding a new member to the group
           | chat).
           | 
           | It does indicate how people think when they buy into the
           | stigma, but also I think it's a general lack of understanding
           | around why Apple keeps iMessage so tightly coupled to its
           | ecosystem and hardware. And many people aren't interested in
           | gaining that understanding.
           | 
           | Social status is very important to many adults, and blue
           | bubbles have become a way to display that social status.
        
           | browningstreet wrote:
           | > I have heard of people saying they won't date green or blue
           | bubble people
           | 
           | But how many times, really?
           | 
           | It's like the missing iPhone headphone jack. The press and
           | bloggers hammered away at it for years, making sure it was an
           | ongoing meme in all coverage, but... do people really care?
           | Some people, sure.. but enough for the coverage?
           | 
           | Same with bubbles.
        
             | mdtusz wrote:
             | Sidebar, but I care about the headphone jack issue and am
             | still annoyed by it.
             | 
             | Bluetooth headphones just aren't very good, and we've all
             | gotten in the habit of buying a new pair every few years
             | because they either break, get lost, are unsupported, or
             | have bad batteries.
             | 
             | I previously had the same pair of IEMs for almost a decade
             | that had better sound quality, replaceable cables and
             | eartips, and didn't ever run out of battery. Never did I
             | complain about the cables being annoying or in the way, and
             | never did I complain about the presence of the headphone
             | jack, or the Bluetooth chip onboard.
             | 
             | Removing headphone jacks was a horrible misstep in my
             | opinion and we're stuck with the path dependency it's
             | created now. It's probably not long before we have laptops
             | that omit 3.5mm audio jacks as well.
        
               | thatguy0900 wrote:
               | I'm down to just using a permanent audio jack to USB c
               | dongle for phones and my computer. Very very silly.
        
             | marssaxman wrote:
             | I've cared about the missing headphone jack on a couple of
             | occasions, when I wanted to stream some music off my
             | partner's phone, but we had to listen to its tinny little
             | speaker instead.
             | 
             | Of course Apple does not need to care what I think, as I am
             | not likely to buy their products anyway.
        
             | idk1 wrote:
             | > But how many times, really?
             | 
             | Two people in the pub, I didn't know them well, but it
             | comes up. What's interesting actually is the green bubble
             | was not an issue for hook-up, but it was an issue for long-
             | term dating. I am talking about two people I've chatted to
             | in a pub about this, and everyone else as well, so take it
             | with a grain of salt.
             | 
             | Bring it up next time your in the pub! See for yourself.
        
             | quantumsequoia wrote:
             | In this experiment, they created identical dating profiles,
             | with the only difference being the brand of phone displayed
             | in photographs. The control was no phone shown in the
             | image.
             | 
             | Featuring an iPhone increased the number of likes received
             | by 82%. Featuring a Samsung increased the number of likes
             | by 20%. That means if you display a Samsung instead of an
             | iPhone in your profile, you will get 34% less likes
             | 
             | Other phone brands did even worse. If your dating profile
             | displays a Oneplus phone, you will get 55% less likes than
             | an identical profile featuring an iPhone
             | 
             | https://www.moneysupermarket.com/mobile-
             | phones/features/mobi...
        
             | yieldcrv wrote:
             | This isn't the same.
             | 
             | Very otherwise upstanding people will absolutely talk
             | behind people's back about that person's green bubble
             | pollution.
             | 
             | People go on to mock the sales pitches android users use
             | since everyone's heard them ad nauseam for a decade
             | 
             | They are generally making deep assumptions about people's
             | decision making process if they have a choice in phone
             | model, and making conclusions about that person's
             | socioeconomic class if they don't have a choice in phone
             | model
             | 
             | And it all ends with a laugh about how most android users
             | live their life without knowing this is happening, but that
             | reinforces the perception of a lack of self awareness and
             | inability to pick up social cues
             | 
             | " _mimicking robot_ but I love how much controllll I have
             | over my phoooone"
             | 
             | "I dont want to be around anyone that cares about
             | superficial things anyway" bro its everyone
        
       | edf13 wrote:
       | Ermmm. Wasn't it green for sms way before iMessage was launched?
        
         | Hamuko wrote:
         | Yes.
         | 
         | https://youtu.be/VQKMoT-6XSg?t=1863
        
           | croes wrote:
           | But black text
        
           | bongobingo1 wrote:
           | Funny to see even Jobs hit `return` to send the message
           | initially.
        
         | randomdata wrote:
         | Yes. From the article: "To be clear, it is not that green is
         | gross. It is the low color contrast of the green Apple picked
         | and used against white text is gross." The original design used
         | black text, for one thing.
        
         | angulardragon03 wrote:
         | Yes and no. It used to be black on green (with imo a way worse
         | green).
         | 
         | https://www.oreilly.com/api/v2/epubs/9780133016529/files/gra...
        
         | tpmx wrote:
         | Yes, but the contrast was good.
         | 
         | iOS 4, green Aqua-ish bubbles with black text:
         | https://d2bs8hqp6qvsw6.cloudfront.net/article/images/750x750...
         | 
         | iOS 5, introducing blue iMessage bubbles (still good contrast
         | in both colors):
         | https://images.anandtech.com/doci/4956/IMG_0907.PNG
         | 
         | The change in contrast came with Ive's "flat" iOS 7:
         | 
         | https://i.insider.com/5df902c5fd9db27769749a5f?width=1300&fo...
        
           | s3p wrote:
           | Read this as "I've OS 7" for a few seconds lol
        
       | thenerdhead wrote:
       | I don't know. The green always looked like the Android logo green
       | back in the day. Less about contrast.
        
       | intrasight wrote:
       | I've never heard an actual human express noticing or caring about
       | the color of the bubble.
        
         | nrb wrote:
         | The main annoying thing when added to a mixed group of SMS and
         | iMessage group chats is that you cannot leave them, or add
         | anyone after the fact without creating an entirely new chat
         | with all the contacts from scratch.
        
         | extragood wrote:
         | It was commented on frequently when I was online dating, to the
         | point that it got annoying. I've had a few friends mention it
         | and jokingly tell me to give in and get an iPhone. I'm mid-
         | thirties.
        
         | MerelyMortal wrote:
         | Me either, and the adults I know, don't even seem to know the
         | difference.
         | 
         | I often get people trying to send me videos or files via SMS (I
         | have an Android, and I guess it normally works for them when
         | sending to other Apple users).
         | 
         | (I say adults, because I often hear kids use it as a status
         | symbol or way to exclude other kids from group messages. I will
         | have to ask the kids I work with what they think about message
         | color bubbles.)
        
         | stjohnswarts wrote:
         | Kids do it, I've heard it, it's an actual thing in that age
         | group, adults don't care. It's like having a collection of
         | gobots instead of transformers if you're an 80s kid.
        
           | umanwizard wrote:
           | I care, and I'm an adult. I don't care _a lot_ , certainly
           | not so much that I'd exclude someone from a social group, but
           | I do get slightly annoyed when I have to communicate with
           | someone via SMS because it's so much slower, less reliable,
           | less featureful etc. than iMessage.
        
       | occamrazor wrote:
       | On my iPhone the green bubbles are much more saturated and
       | legible than in the posted article.
        
         | null_object wrote:
         | Exactly - the author fictionalized some examples for his phony
         | thesis.
        
           | stjohnswarts wrote:
           | phony... I see what you did there.
        
         | malshe wrote:
         | Same here. https://imgur.com/a/7k5dMtm
        
           | graeber_28927 wrote:
           | I checked those background colors with this contrast
           | calculator [0] against white:
           | 
           | - Contrast of your iPhone: 2.21:1 (#35c759)
           | 
           | - Contrast that's "poor": 2.17:1 (#65c466)
           | 
           | - Contrast that's "good": 2.93:1 (#3bac3c)
           | 
           | - Contrast of the blue: 3.95:1 (#367bf5)
           | 
           | Based on this I would say that the Contrast of your green and
           | the "gross" one from the article are actually pretty close,
           | both being very far from the contrast that blue provides.
           | 
           | Not even the good green from the article does match the
           | contrast of the blue. They are being lenient I'd say, not
           | misleading.
           | 
           | [0]: https://webaim.org/resources/contrastchecker/
        
       | freeplay wrote:
       | It's not the color or contrast of the bubbles that make me think
       | negatively, it's the fact that once I see a green bubble in a
       | group text, I know it's going to be a bad experience.
       | 
       | Any photo, video, or reaction gif that people send will be
       | compressed down a couple of pixels and replies will often be out
       | of chronological order.
        
         | joshenberg wrote:
         | I take so much shit for 'ruining the group chat' when it's
         | always the complainants devices that is blocked from sending
         | high resolution pics to poor people. Drives me fucking bonkers
         | when I point out that their reactions to it are precisely why
         | it's not being fixed.
        
       | CharlesW wrote:
       | I have a problem with the thesis statement that people think
       | green bubbles are "gross", which uncritically parrots Google's
       | "Get the Message" PR campaign.
       | 
       | I know that iPhone-using teens don't care about this in SoCal,
       | the virtue signalling capital of the world. Their group chats
       | with friends are all green, so if anything's "gross" it's the
       | blue bubbles of their parental conversations.
       | 
       | In the meantime, RCS is missing really basic capabilities. For
       | example, RCS encryption only works for 1:1 conversations, so
       | things like family chats are not private. Even Android
       | publications are asking if RCS is too little, too late.
       | 
       | https://www.androidpolice.com/android-iphone-rcs-give-up-mes...
        
         | pkulak wrote:
         | > which uncritically parrots Google "Get the Message" PR
         | campaign.
         | 
         | You're misunderstanding the order of events here. "I don't talk
         | to green bubbles" has been a thing for at least five years now,
         | which Google has very recently used in an ad campaign.
        
           | CharlesW wrote:
           | > _" I don't talk to green bubbles" has been a thing for at
           | least five years now..._
           | 
           | Almost always as a joke. And if you search HN, nearly all
           | conversations about this PR-manufactured "green bubbles"
           | outrage have happened since the launch of Google's campaign.
        
             | pkulak wrote:
             | Nearly all the conversations about the PR have been since
             | the PR? I don't doubt it. I'm saying the green bubbles
             | thing has existed since long before that. Google ticked it
             | up a bit, but come on. Let's not give Google PR too much
             | credit here:
             | 
             | https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?date=today%205-y&g
             | e...
        
           | snowwrestler wrote:
           | Have you ever actually used Messages? "I don't talk to green
           | bubbles" can't be a thing because your own messages are the
           | ones that are blue or green.
           | 
           | The bubbles for everyone else (the people you are talking to)
           | are always all the same color: dark grey.
        
         | enragedcacti wrote:
         | > In the meantime, RCS is missing really basic capabilities.
         | For example, RCS encryption only works for 1:1 conversations,
         | so things like family chats are not private.
         | 
         | As opposed to iMessage, but certainly not as opposed to SMS
         | which is what RCS would actually be replacing on the iPhone.
         | Apple would rather have EVERY conversation with an android user
         | unencrypted rather than work towards a solution.
        
           | CharlesW wrote:
           | Apple is not standards-resistant, if that's what you're
           | suggesting. Given their history of supporting standards (and
           | occasionally leading a standard's adoption), that's clearly
           | not the case.
           | 
           | RCS is not a slam dunk. Juniper Research says RCS-capable
           | subscribers represent less than 13% of global mobile
           | subscribers in 2022. (They project that that will double to
           | 40% by 2026, FWIW.)
           | 
           | End-to-encryption is not part of the RCS standard, but is
           | instead a Google-proprietary layer on top of that. I assume
           | that Apple can't seriously consider adopting RCS until that
           | omission is fixed. It would be crazy for Apple to create a
           | Google dependency for something as critical as messaging,
           | especially given Google's long history of failures in this
           | area.
        
             | enragedcacti wrote:
             | fwiw I completely agree, RCS is completely dead outside of
             | Google dragging it forward and thats a huge problem, I just
             | don't think the largest company on the planet shrugging
             | their shoulders and saying "maybe your grandma should buy
             | an iPhone" is acceptable.
             | 
             | Their historical position has hurt their own customers,
             | android users, and the standardization process itself. RCS
             | (or a different standard) would be in a completely
             | different place if Apple in their US market leadership
             | position had made an effort.
             | 
             | They could open the iMessage spec, they could publish an
             | iMessage app for Android, or they could just contribute in
             | good faith to the standardization process. Their hostility
             | to _this particular_ standardization process (I don 't
             | contest that Apple is happy to support many standards
             | efforts, such as USB) is driven by profit to the detriment
             | of pretty much everyone else.
        
       | frabia wrote:
       | mmm I really doubt that was the real reason why you "dislike" the
       | green message and that it was purposefully designed like so by
       | Apple.
       | 
       | I think this is a case of learned significance, for which you
       | know that a green bubble means a message sent via SMS rather than
       | the "smarter" message. Added to the fact the blue is often used
       | by tech companies due to its fresh and modern connotation, you
       | have the full picture on why your brain prefers the blue to the
       | green message.
       | 
       | That being said, I think Apple should have been more careful
       | about making their message bubble pass contrast tests. But I
       | doubt there was an "evil designer" carefully planning to make
       | that bubble with lower contrast on purpose to make you dislike
       | it.
        
       | stjohnswarts wrote:
       | I don't think I've seen this much speculation without a single
       | source in a long time...
        
       | henriquez wrote:
       | It reminds me how MacOS has the icon for any networked Windows PC
       | as a "blue screen of death" monitor
        
         | s3p wrote:
         | Actually love this one lol
        
         | stjohnswarts wrote:
         | they want to prepare you :)
        
         | detritus wrote:
         | I had to check to see if you were kidding. You're not. That's
         | hilarious. Petty, and hilarious.
        
           | bitwize wrote:
           | That's almost as good as the Windows Vista/7 icon for
           | "Network" -- computers connected to a pneumatic tube
           | (referencing Senator Ted Stevens and his "series of tubes"
           | comment).
        
         | drewzero1 wrote:
         | I found it especially funny that it still uses that icon for
         | Linux machines with Samba shares.
        
           | trissylegs wrote:
           | Unless you enable fruit vfs then it thinks it's a mac but
           | doesn't not what model you so get a big question mark.
        
         | rsfinn wrote:
         | ...which suggests that the notion that some designer at Apple
         | subtly decreased the contrast on green bubbles to make them
         | look "gross" is ridiculous -- if they really wanted to make SMS
         | messages look bad, they could be much less subtle about it...
        
       | scarface74 wrote:
       | Green was the original color of text messages when the iPhone was
       | introduced. When Apple introduced iMessages four or five years
       | later they made iMessages Blue.
       | 
       | This isn't some great conspiracy.
        
         | nixpulvis wrote:
         | I have no idea why this comment is downvoted. This is exactly
         | the question you should be asking if you care about Apple's
         | intent as the article claims.
        
         | 1over137 wrote:
         | Did you RTFA? It's not about the colour, it's about the
         | contrast.
         | 
         | I wonder if the contrast has changed over the years. It could
         | be a worse green today than originally.
        
           | scarface74 wrote:
           | Have you thought that screen technology used in iPhones may
           | not be the same since 2007?
           | 
           | The original iPhone had a resolution of 320x480 with much
           | worse color reproduction.
        
         | croes wrote:
         | But the text was black
        
           | scarface74 wrote:
           | And the screen had much worse color reproduction, a lower
           | resolution, and much worse text rendering. There are a
           | million reasons to change the color than to make your kids
           | feel bad.
        
       | at_a_remove wrote:
       | If it doesn't pass an accessibility suite, that's fine. Point it
       | out, mock, and so on. Perhaps a shame into action. But that word
       | choice ...
       | 
       | Low contrast is now "gross." Yikes!
        
       | rubyist5eva wrote:
       | It's because the plebes that can't afford iphones are gross. /s
        
       | xnx wrote:
       | If Google didn't have so many messaging apps, they could counter
       | by putting messages from non-Android users in comic sans.
        
       | dimitrios1 wrote:
       | Nice theory, but the reality of how these decisions get made is
       | usually far less interesting.
       | 
       | Some product owner probably wanted the iMessage enabled texter to
       | "pop" and the designers usually take that and roll with it
       | usually through some combination of boldening one, and
       | deemphasizing the other to give the overall desired effect. It's
       | a good call out for them to improve the color contrast, but you
       | can adjust the contrast yourself through the accessibility
       | options.
        
       | unknownaccount wrote:
       | When will people realize that the point of differentiating
       | between Android/iOS bubbles isn't about discriminating against
       | teenagers, but rather it's about security. If my messages are
       | being sent through an insecure protocol that leaks my messages to
       | the police, carrier, and skids with a rtl-SDR (SMS) rather than a
       | secure encrypted protocol (iMessage), I want it to be obvious.
       | 
       | They have every reason to make "green bubbles" look toxic and off
       | putting, because unencrypted SMS is genuinely hazardous.
        
         | schroeding wrote:
         | The shade of low-contrast-y green is similar to the one used by
         | some browsers not too long ago when an EV TLS certificate was
         | used, to underline the security of the connection.
         | 
         | If it's the goal to implicate danger, this strikes me as a
         | weird colour choice for dangerous messages, to be honest.
         | 
         | This whole "thing" around "bad" green vs blue message bubbles
         | appears a bit, for the lack of a better word, insane to me as a
         | non-american. The bubbles are fine. IMO, the problem is very
         | obviously that kids can be cruel jerks and "not having an
         | iPhone" is a social stigma for US teenagers, just like "not
         | having a flashy cell phone with Bluetooth and MMS" was 15 years
         | ago. Changing the colour will not fix this stigma, there still
         | isn't an Apple on the back of the Android phones.
        
           | unknownaccount wrote:
           | If they put a more fitting skull or danger icon on the
           | bubbles instead people would really lose their shit.
        
         | staticassertion wrote:
         | That makes very little sense. If it's for security it does a
         | terrible job of conveying that, nor would it help anything
         | since you're already in the conversation with that person.
        
         | asdajksah2123 wrote:
         | The point is to make non iPhones uncool.
        
           | unknownaccount wrote:
           | No, it's to indicate when you are texting someone over an
           | insecure protocol.
           | 
           | This is just like saying the colored HTTPS symbol in the
           | browser toolbar on websites that support SSL was designed to
           | make websites without SSL look uncool.
        
         | MAGZine wrote:
         | RCS has end to end encryption.
         | 
         | When I text other android users, my messages are encrypted.
         | When I text an iPhone, they are not.
         | 
         | Stop supporting closed protocols and bad-faith actors.
        
           | unknownaccount wrote:
           | RCS isn't anywhere nearly as widely adopted as SMS, depends
           | entirely on the carrier setting it up properly, and didn't
           | get end to end encryption until relatively recently. Many
           | years after this whole green vs. blue debacle started.
           | 
           | Once 99% of phones and carriers support RCS then maybe you
           | could make this argument, but it won't be for several years.
        
             | MAGZine wrote:
             | anecdotally, in the US/Canada, everytime I text someone
             | running android, I get e2e encryption.
             | 
             | Most US carriers have rolled it out by now (or can be
             | completely circumvented by using Android Messages app) and
             | the green bubble teasing seems like a USA specific
             | phenomena.
             | 
             | Anyhow, so what you mean to say, is that it's not about
             | security (because it's present and accessible), but it's
             | about appearances. And worst, the platform perpetuating the
             | the appearances is not making any moves to secure it's
             | messaging to non-Apple devices. Unacceptable.
        
       | daniel-cussen wrote:
        
       | samiam_iam wrote:
       | Green is not a negative color in all cases. Green also signifies
       | good to go
        
         | bongobingo1 wrote:
         | The fine article makes no mention of green being a "negative
         | color", it's not even about the color, try giving it a read.
        
       | yalogin wrote:
       | The author is just overthinking things here. If anything, green
       | is the color used to indicate "go", a positive sign that has been
       | etched into our minds. The reason is very clear as already
       | mentioned "it doesn't support messages". Why isn't that
       | explanation enough?
       | 
       | EDIT: to clarify here, the author does explain his point about
       | the color and the contrast of the text. He may have a point there
       | but IMO, the main issue was that it's not messages. The thing I
       | should have added is that back when it was implemented people had
       | to pay real money per message to send as a text message. That
       | means everyone in the group had to feel uncomfortable sending
       | frivolous messages when it costs someone money. I think that is
       | the real reason for the bifurcation and not the color choice.
        
         | volleygman180 wrote:
         | The article elaborates, however. It's not a problem that green
         | is used. It's that Apple chose a lightness/shade that is less
         | accessible.
         | 
         | Given their attention to detail in design (see the rabbithole
         | of their Human Interface Guidelines -
         | https://developer.apple.com/design/human-interface-
         | guideline...), I agree with the author in that this was an
         | intentional design choice that Apple made.
        
         | afavour wrote:
         | I don't mean to sound like an asshole here but did you read the
         | article? The author outlines that the contrast applied to the
         | green is less readable than the blue, to the point where it
         | falls below accessibility guidelines.
         | 
         | I personally am not convinced by the theory that Apple is doing
         | this deliberately (though it doesn't sound impossible to me
         | either!) but either way it's something they should change.
        
           | scarface74 wrote:
           | Well seeing that every one of the authors images don't jibe
           | with reality - ie his images aren't what are actually on
           | iPhones in terms of saturation - it kind of makes his entire
           | thesis moot
        
             | afavour wrote:
             | Yes and no: a screenshot of an iPhone isn't really a great
             | representation of what you see when you're outdoors in
             | daylight, for example. The general point still stands that
             | the contrast is better in the blue than it is in the green
             | and Apple could normalize them with no issues.
        
           | malshe wrote:
           | The author's example of the green text looks pale compared to
           | what it really is.
        
         | moolcool wrote:
         | If you don't think Apple had the same thoughts OP did during
         | the design process, you don't know Apple.
        
           | scarface74 wrote:
           | Seeing that the change in saturation happened when Ives took
           | over the iPhone UI when iOS 7 was introduced, it was just one
           | of many poorly thought out decisions that were made under
           | Ives leadership.
        
       | arikr wrote:
       | The author should've included an example of a green with great
       | contrast.
        
         | sainotbot wrote:
         | It's in the first image, the one that says "Good".
        
         | 1ko wrote:
         | It's there, in the first image of the article.
        
       | badwolf wrote:
       | This seems super cherry picked and disingenuous.
       | 
       | The colors of both blue and green messages fade as they scroll
       | up. Looking at my phone right now, the lighter contrast the
       | author seems to be calling out is only shown on a message that is
       | scrolled up. This is the same with blue imessage bubbles, they
       | also fade and have lower contrast when scrolled up.
        
       | brap wrote:
       | A few weeks ago I went over my SMS history, going back several
       | months.
       | 
       | About 99% of the SMS I get is bots. The vast majority was spam
       | (making me wish I could disable SMS altogether), then some alerts
       | (e.g from my bank) and 2SV codes.
       | 
       | The other 1% were delivery people.
       | 
       | Exactly 0.0% were people in my contacts.
        
       | Overtonwindow wrote:
       | But I want to know is, who cares? I have yet to find a single
       | person who says to me that they think it's unfair that their text
       | messages come across as a green bubble on my iPhone instead of
       | blue.
       | 
       | Why is this even an issue?!?
        
       | lifeformed wrote:
       | No one here read the article, it has nothing to do with it being
       | green but with it being low contrast.
        
         | nerdponx wrote:
         | Or it's interesting to discuss the fact that Apple deliberately
         | makes SMS message UX and UI worse than iMessage.
        
           | stjohnswarts wrote:
           | Author had zero proof of that and speculated the entire time.
        
         | LAC-Tech wrote:
         | I'm not sure if you're imploring us not to read the article
         | because the title sucks.
         | 
         | Or admonishing us for not reading the article, because we've
         | misunderstood it based on the title.
        
           | gigglesupstairs wrote:
           | Title is kind of on point too because it is indeed a trick -
           | a dark pattern - which is part of the topic of User
           | Experience which the website uxdesign.cc specializes in.
           | Also, it would have been hard to put the explanation inside
           | title without making it too long.
        
         | pipeline_peak wrote:
         | To be fair, he could've cut to the chase sooner. Since it was a
         | UI UX article, HN readers probably aren't aware that it's a
         | contrast between fonts and background, not blue vs green or
         | green vs dark green.
        
           | onychomys wrote:
           | He could have cut to the chase sooner than the header to
           | paragraph 2?
        
           | stjohnswarts wrote:
           | They could sum it up in the first paragraph and then
           | extrapolate, but like most of these things they stretch it
           | out until the bottom.
        
           | r12343a_19 wrote:
           | HN readers are aware about poor contrast. Eg, your comment
           | (which seems tame) is downvoted and has some lovely light
           | color on light background combo.
        
             | pipeline_peak wrote:
             | What a weirdly snide comment.
        
           | sjsdaiuasgdia wrote:
           | It opens with an image of two green bubbles, one higher
           | contrast than the other. The higher contrast one is labeled
           | "Good" and the lower contrast "Gross".
           | 
           | After a two sentence paragraph expressing how the green/blue
           | technical differentiation has become a social one, it then
           | asks the question "Why is green worse than blue?" The next
           | line: "The answer is color contrast."
           | 
           | What could they have realistically done to cut to the chase
           | sooner in a meaningful way? The only real thing is ditching
           | those two context building sentences. But it's two short
           | sentences, providing relevant context.
           | 
           | Doesn't really feel like a valid criticism IMO.
        
       | bombcar wrote:
       | I wish Apple accessibility let you change the colors.
        
       | pdpi wrote:
       | A large problem with this whole idea is that there is no one
       | single blue or green involved.
       | 
       | iMessage shades the bubbles depending on position, and shows both
       | the blue and green bubbles as darker at the bottom of the screen,
       | and lighter at the top.
        
         | tpmx wrote:
         | So, then compare them at a similar position?
         | 
         | A side-by-side screenshot of iOS 7, when this design was
         | introduced:
         | 
         | https://i.insider.com/5df902c5fd9db27769749a5f?width=1300&fo...
        
           | nyuszika7h wrote:
           | That's definitely not iOS 7. Those screenshots are from a
           | notched device, which means at least iOS 11, and based on the
           | app drawer on the bottom it looks more like iOS 12 or above.
        
             | tpmx wrote:
             | Should have been "the design introduced with iOS 7".
        
       | wrs wrote:
       | Given all this swirling cultural context, doesn't it seem odd
       | that the icon for the Messages app is still green?
        
       | denismurphy wrote:
       | why does this even matter? As a european i just don't get it, i
       | use a iPhone have in the past used Android most of my friends and
       | family use Android no one cares.
        
         | booleandilemma wrote:
         | The problem for us was not the color of the bubbles but the
         | issue of android users not being able to join imessage group
         | chats. My family solved the problem by using whatsapp.
        
         | stjohnswarts wrote:
         | Basically US teens/kids assume you're poor and not cool if you
         | have a green bubble. It really is as simple as that. It's
         | exactly as shallow as it sounds and is not actually as big of a
         | deal as the article makes it out to be.
        
           | denismurphy wrote:
           | Where i live Schools have banned both phones and social media
           | because it greatest source of bullying/harassment. The kids
           | have iPad's in class for educational purposes
           | https://www.rte.ie/news/munster/2018/0419/955622-kerry-
           | schoo...
        
       | SllX wrote:
       | Yeah no. The iMessage white-on-blue isn't a significantly better
       | contrast ratio. I would actually prefer black text here.
       | 
       | Low contrast UI elements are the calling card of Alan Dye's
       | design team. The iMessage and SMS contrast ratio doesn't rank
       | because there are so many other UI issues that have crept in from
       | this team over the years. If the blue provides a slightly better
       | contrast ratio, it is bound to be incidental and if I were a
       | betting man, I would bet that someone actually _likes_ the green
       | used for SMS.
       | 
       | This entire message style by the way is a direct descendant of
       | iChat AV where you could actually choose your message color. When
       | Apple developed SMS and then iMessageS for iPhones, they chose
       | basically iChat's design, and picked their favorite bubble colors
       | and what we have today evolved from that.
       | 
       | E.g.: [1] https://osxdaily.com/2011/02/14/prevent-annoying-im-
       | text-sty...
       | 
       | (note the drop-down menu with "Lime" selected, you can Google
       | around for other colors).
       | 
       | [2] https://flylib.com/books/en/1.463.1.538/1/
        
       | jmbwell wrote:
       | Summary: the green bubbles have lower contrast than the blue
       | bubbles. Lower contrast is associated with lower accessibility,
       | according to published Web Content Accessibility Guidelines.
       | Tricks, purpose, and grossness are speculative.
        
       | rsfinn wrote:
       | At the time the green/blue distinction appeared in Messages, it
       | was widely reported that the green color for SMS messages
       | represented the fact that most cellular plans in the US at the
       | time charged a fee for each SMS message sent, or had a higher
       | monthly rate for "unlimited" texts. It would seem that very few
       | people remember the days before "unlimited data/text/minutes".
       | 
       | (US currency is typically associated with the color green in a
       | way that probably doesn't apply elsewhere in the world. Also, the
       | actual color of green on US paper currency is quite different
       | from the green bubbles... but I digress.)
        
       | swamp40 wrote:
       | They also flash "Android Sucks" in large Arial letters on the
       | screen for 30ms once every 5 seconds when you have green bubbles.
       | 
       | Subliminal messaging work better than poor contrast.
        
       | PaulHoule wrote:
       | It would be an interesting test to make the green bubble dark and
       | the blue bubble light.
        
       | whywhywhywhy wrote:
       | At this point the fact they're using this as a product
       | differentiator is so blatant they may as well make a fart sound
       | when they appear if they're green.
        
       | pipeline_peak wrote:
       | At first, it sounded like a stretched out conspiracy theory. When
       | I looked at the "correctly" contrasted green in the first image
       | that was darker, it made more sense.
       | 
       | The lighter greyish green gives off a lower standard, almost as
       | if the Android user was a guest user or in free trial mode.
        
       | drcongo wrote:
       | This article is absolute nonsense from start to finish. If this
       | was remotely true, they'd have done a side by side of a low
       | contrast blue with good contrast green, but they didn't, because
       | everyone would have seen exactly how wrong the article is.
        
       | null_object wrote:
       | Ye article is complete bullshit and makes-up some fictional
       | examples: for instance the bubbles supposedly on a "brighter
       | screen" are shown as totally desaturated and 'blown-out' but
       | unfortunately for the author's thesis, screen brightness does not
       | affect UI elements in this way, at all.
       | 
       | Edit: Haha thx for the downvotes but the article is still lying
       | with phony made-up images.
        
         | martin_a wrote:
         | It does affect your visual impression in the eye, though. If
         | you're using a bright screen in a dim environment, your eyes
         | will be hurt by the bright light, you flinch and that will
         | reduce the perceptive contrast.
        
           | null_object wrote:
           | > It does affect your visual impression in the eye, though.
           | If you're using a bright screen in a dim environment, your
           | eyes will be hurt by the bright light, you flinch and that
           | will reduce the perceptive contrast.
           | 
           | See a few posts above where someone did the hard work of
           | taking _real_ screenshots instead of the totally bullshit
           | fictional ones the author has in the article.
        
       | oneplane wrote:
       | This seems to be mostly a US American thing, mainly because of
       | the same reasons BBM was a thing: lots of chats over SMS used to
       | be a thing, and then chats over iMessage, which like BBM, you can
       | only join if you have a device from a specific vendor. That means
       | that you can only be in a special social circle if you buy the
       | same stuff. That won't change because of some colours, because
       | it's not the colours causing the tribalism, it can exist
       | perfectly fine without it.
       | 
       | In Western Europe, South America and Asia it's mostly just some
       | specific app (WhatsApp for example, or Signal, or WeChat or LINE)
       | and as a fallback SMS. And if SMS turns from one colour bubble to
       | another colour it doesn't really do anything for users on either
       | end. This deep integration with colours and status symbols does
       | remain in specific areas like middle school where it is still
       | seen as important to try to project wealth.
        
         | ahaseeb wrote:
         | Absolutely but in US, you'll be surprised how much texting is
         | still used
        
         | nottorp wrote:
         | Yeah, no one uses plain sms messages across the pond any more.
         | 
         | And sms group chats? I only know about sms group chats from US
         | posters.
         | 
         | You can just assume everyone has Whatsapp here, and just
         | message them over that.
        
           | nottorp wrote:
           | Id rather not exclude people who dont have an iPhone, either
           | because they cant afford it or believe Samsung marketing.
        
           | mmcnl wrote:
           | Even iMessage is barely used. In The Netherlands, WhatsApp is
           | king. And WhatsApp doesn't discriminate.
        
           | reaperducer wrote:
           | _You can just assume everyone has Whatsapp here, and just
           | message them over that._
           | 
           | Trusting your private conversations to ~Facebook~ Meta is
           | also a signal.
        
           | taylodl wrote:
           | Using Facebook to do messaging? No thanks! Sure, when
           | communicating with international friends I use WhatsApp
           | because that appears to be what the rest of the world uses,
           | but here in the States? No. We don't trust Zuckerberg. And
           | yes, iMessage group chats are very much a thing here in the
           | States and SMS group chats in general. And also yes, there's
           | always that techie friend with an Android and makes your
           | whole conversation go "green." Thing is, only middle
           | schoolers really seem to care. I just know it means the
           | communication isn't secured end-to-end.
        
             | kaba0 wrote:
             | Well, I would fear verizon or whatever much more than
             | Zuckerberg, especially that sms is plain text (not iMessage
             | though).
             | 
             | Nonetheless, it is a self-made problem in the US, which
             | wouldn't even make sense in the EU because we don't have
             | such a high percentage of apple devices.
        
             | brokenkebab2 wrote:
             | I didn't like FB well before it became fashionable, but I
             | don't understand your logic here: what is that exactly that
             | you can't entrust WhatsApp to send, but you can trust
             | Apple, or your mobile carrier?
        
               | ar_lan wrote:
               | I'm not really answering your question, but in the
               | States, there is a lot more trust placed in Apple over
               | Facebook. This isn't _that_ surprising - Apple has a much
               | stauncher stance on privacy than alternatives.
               | 
               | I wish Signal would be more popular, but it's just not. I
               | can't really ask new people I meet to communicate over
               | Signal because it's a burden to get others to install
               | some new application.
        
               | Dma54rhs wrote:
               | DMing on Instagram is super popular in USA. Most of the
               | people don't give a shit about privacy to begin with.
        
               | nottorp wrote:
               | Im tired of super secure apps that ask for your phone
               | number and even publish it to your contacts. Wake me up
               | when Signal doesnt depend on a phone number any more.
        
               | ls15 wrote:
               | I don't know about GPs logic, but my logic is pretty
               | simple. I don't use any infrastructure that Mark
               | Zuckerberg had his fingers on. That was clear to me after
               | the first time I saw him.
        
               | mmmlinux wrote:
               | Facebook's goal is to extract as much information from
               | you as possible. Apple wants to sell you a new phone.
        
               | brokenkebab2 wrote:
               | It's absolutely not like that. Apple extracts profits in
               | a lots of ways, including those which rely on gathering
               | personal data.
               | 
               | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32539762
        
               | taylodl wrote:
               | Apple's iMessage is secured end-to-end, your mobile
               | carrier can't see the message. As soon as the box goes
               | green then any intermediary, including your mobile
               | carrier and your friend's mobile carrier, can read the
               | message and/or make it available to law enforcement.
               | 
               | In a U.S. court of law Apple has stood up to authority
               | and pointed out they can't provide the messages requested
               | as they're locked even to Apple. Facebook on the other
               | hand has acquiesced to U.S. law enforcement. That tells
               | me that even if Facebook has secured end-to-end
               | messaging, which I don't think they've ever claimed, they
               | have backdoors.
        
               | umanwizard wrote:
               | WhatsApp definitely claims end-to-end encryption. There's
               | a bubble telling you so at the top of every new WhatsApp
               | thread.
        
               | ahaseeb wrote:
               | If that's the case how do they detect if a message has
               | been forwarded too many times ?
        
               | mmcnl wrote:
               | WhatsApp is end-to-end encrypted. WhatsApp actually uses
               | the Signal Protocol. Probably the best protocol they
               | could use. It's described pretty detailed in a whitepaper
               | publicly available on the WhatsApp website:
               | https://www.whatsapp.com/security/WhatsApp-Security-
               | Whitepap...
        
               | taylodl wrote:
               | You got me to look into this further. I was seeing if
               | there was a backdoor - and it appears there isn't.
               | https://signal.org/blog/there-is-no-whatsapp-backdoor/
               | 
               | Given that I don't see why more of us Americans aren't
               | using WhatsApp! :)
        
               | mmcnl wrote:
               | Ofcourse WhatsApp is not open source, as opposed to
               | Signal (the app). You can never be truly sure if the
               | protocol is implemented without backdoors because you
               | can't verify the code. But I agree, WhatsApp is a pretty
               | solid app.
        
             | umanwizard wrote:
             | > but here in the States? No. We don't trust Zuckerberg
             | 
             | Completely false. I have multiple group chats in Messenger.
             | The people who "don't trust Zuckerberg" enough to not use
             | his messaging products are a tiny minority of people in the
             | US.
        
             | quantumsequoia wrote:
             | > We don't trust Zuckerberg
             | 
             | This is a common excuse I hear in college to not use FB
             | messenger or Whatsapp. But those same people usually have
             | no issues using Instagram DMs. For most people, it's just a
             | cover story to mask the real reason: Facebook messenger and
             | whatsapp are uncool in the US
        
           | ericmay wrote:
           | > You can just assume everyone has Whatsapp here, and just
           | message them over that.
           | 
           | Yea but that's a problem too.
        
             | scatters wrote:
             | WhatsApp doesn't have anywhere near the same lockin as
             | Apple. You can run multiple messaging apps even on a low
             | end android phone.
        
               | checkyoursudo wrote:
               | I can run WhatsApp on my iPhone. I cannot get my kids'
               | school parents-group not to use WhatsApp. It was a pain
               | to get even my best friends in Europe to use anything
               | except WhatsApp.
        
               | scatters wrote:
               | Well done that parents' group. Obviously something like
               | Signal would be better, but that'll happen once there's
               | enough social consensus.
        
               | ls15 wrote:
               | Meanwhile, I am lighting a candle for every poor soul
               | that has been pressured into installing Meta products.
        
               | stevedzreams wrote:
               | What did you propose as the alterntive?
        
               | kube-system wrote:
               | Lock-in through the network effect is lock in. The fact
               | that it's the de facto standard outside the US is quite a
               | network effect.
               | 
               | SMS by contrast is an open standard.
        
               | kaba0 wrote:
               | SMS is just terrible though, and is just not worth using.
               | It is plain text, limited in size and simply has less
               | features.
        
               | kube-system wrote:
               | What anyone means when they say SMS post ~2010 is SMS/MMS
        
               | kaba0 wrote:
               | It didn't get better.
        
               | kube-system wrote:
               | That's just like, your opinion, man. SMS/MMS is
               | decentralized, open, and works on every modern mobile
               | phone out of the box. No other text messaging technology
               | does this yet.
        
               | ericmay wrote:
               | > Lock-in through the network effect is lock in.
               | 
               | Exactly. If your complaint is about being locked in but
               | the platform you use is the one everyone has to use
               | because of network effect or otherwise _you yourself are
               | locked in with that platform_.
        
               | scatters wrote:
               | The network effect only results in lock-in if there's an
               | obstacle to using multiple networks at the same time.
               | Obviously no-one is going to carry around two phones, so
               | that's how Apple achieves lock-in. By contrast, keeping
               | two or more messaging apps running is trivial.
               | 
               | And SMS is irrelevant.
        
               | ericmay wrote:
               | Did you mean WhatsApp doesn't have anywhere near the same
               | lock in as the Messages app? I don't know what you mean
               | by "same lock in as Apple". I also don't know what you
               | would mean by lock in with the Messages app. What's
               | locked in? I can use WhatsApp, Signal, Telegram, WeChat,
               | or any number of communication apps on my iPhone
               | effortlessly.
        
               | scatters wrote:
               | Apple's messages app isn't really an app; it comes
               | preinstalled on the phone, you can't remove it or
               | substitute it with another app, and you can't install it
               | on non-Apple hardware.
               | 
               | The lock-in is obvious: if you're part of Apple-oriented
               | chat groups you can't switch to Android without losing
               | access to those groups, degrading the experience for
               | everyone, or convincing each one of those groups to make
               | the switch to a multi-platform alternative. Claiming not
               | to see this is disingenuous.
        
               | ericmay wrote:
               | > Apple's messages app isn't really an app; it comes
               | preinstalled on the phone, you can't remove it or
               | substitute it with another app, and you can't install it
               | on non-Apple hardware.
               | 
               | I'm not sure, but I don't think you can actually
               | uninstall the default SMS from Android phones either
               | without having another app installed at a minimum and
               | then I bet similar to Messages if you were to somehow
               | uninstall that app then the default app would appear
               | since it's probably part of the core operating system
               | (similar to other basic functionality like settings or a
               | phone app to receive calls).
               | 
               | I don't know what you mean by you cannot substitute
               | Messages with another app. If I didn't want to use
               | Messages I would just disable all settings and remove it
               | from the home screen and use whatever I wanted instead
               | just fine.
               | 
               | You are correct that you cannot install Messages on non-
               | Apple hardware. Not all software is open source or
               | available for all platforms. For example I cannot install
               | Playstation software on my Xbox, nor can I buy a Nest
               | Thermostat and install a competitor's software on it
               | (without hacking both of course). There are games that
               | are made that aren't created with support for macOS. Etc.
               | 
               | > if you're part of Apple-oriented chat groups you can't
               | switch to Android without losing access to those groups
               | 
               | What is an Apple-oriented chat group?
        
               | scatters wrote:
               | > if you were to somehow uninstall [the Android SMS] app
               | then the default app would appear since it's probably
               | part of the core operating system
               | 
               | No. Why would it?
               | 
               | > I don't know what you mean by you cannot substitute
               | Messages with another app.
               | 
               | On Android, if you don't like the SMS app you can replace
               | it with another app that has all the same functionality
               | (and more). Does Apple let you do that?
               | 
               | > What is an Apple-oriented chat group?
               | 
               | Please engage with the discussion. One that uses Apple's
               | proprietary SMS extensions, obviously.
        
               | criddell wrote:
               | Is WhatsApp open? Are there alternative clients?
        
               | scatters wrote:
               | Even better: it's a player in a competitive market. So
               | you can switch your chats one-by-one to Signal, Telegram
               | or whatever floats your boat.
        
               | criddell wrote:
               | What do you mean by _switch your chats_. You can't have
               | the chat in more than one client at a time?
        
               | scatters wrote:
               | Yes, that's why it's switching.
        
               | ls15 wrote:
               | I am glad that the EU actually has another definition of
               | letting people use what is floating their boat: Force
               | big-tech player to open up protocols, so users can send
               | messages from any messenger to any other messenger.
               | 
               | https://techcrunch.com/2022/03/24/dma-political-
               | agreement/
               | 
               | As a user I cannot see any downsides.
        
           | alistairSH wrote:
           | How do you message when you don't have wifi/data? I can SMS
           | from more remote places than I can any internet-based
           | service.
        
             | bmicraft wrote:
             | I've never been anywhere where I legitimately had signal
             | but no data. When it seems to be connected buy isn't, sms
             | mostly also won't go though. I also think there are less
             | "remote" places in europe in general.
        
             | joecot wrote:
             | You don't. But in the US I'm rarely in a place where I have
             | no data but SMS still works. And Europe has more effective
             | telecom service.
        
               | culturestate wrote:
               | _> Europe has more effective telecom service_
               | 
               |  _Some_ of Europe has very effective telecom
               | infrastructure, but that 's far from universal.
        
               | dghughes wrote:
               | Cries in Canadian :(
        
               | culturestate wrote:
               | It could be worse. Service is so famously bad in Germany
               | that they invented a word for it - Funklochrepublik,
               | which basically means "radio hole republic."
        
             | kaba0 wrote:
             | Well, with imessage being on topic, apple seems to be
             | really terrible at changing to sms when someone is not
             | available online -- I ran out of internet data once and
             | tried to text my girlfriend on imessage assuming it will
             | just send an sms, and it just waited for like 10 minutes
             | before telling me it couldn't be sent. The other side is
             | even worse - I would have assumed apple checks whether the
             | other half is expected to come online anytime soon and if
             | not, send an sms instead. Nope, you just don't get a
             | message and are expected to long press and send as sms
             | manually.
        
             | zeku wrote:
             | You just don't. Their adoption of Whatsapp(at least in
             | Spain), seems to have been driven by a period in time when
             | WhatsApp was coming up that the plans sold by cell service
             | providers were near unlimited data, but only X amount of
             | calls/texts allowed to be sent per month.
             | 
             | In the USA we had opposite plans during this time.
             | Unlimited talk/text, but strict data caps.
        
             | coldtea wrote:
             | In most of the world you do have either wifi or data
             | coverage.
             | 
             | Usually, if you don't have data for signal (as opposed to
             | run out of data in your plan) reasons, then you don't have
             | signal at all, even for SMS, either...
        
         | yieldcrv wrote:
         | so its only an American thing because everyone in your
         | continent agrees that SMS sucks too and should shun anyone
         | using it
         | 
         | Yes, thats exactly whats going on in the US as well
         | 
         | (and yes, we know that Google has recently adopted some other
         | open source messaging standard that _now_ Apple hasn 't.)
        
         | dj_mc_merlin wrote:
         | > in specific areas like middle school where it is still seen
         | as important to try to project wealth.
         | 
         | Surely it's not middle school when people try to project wealth
         | the most.. kids care more about who has an iPhone than adults
         | but adults project wealth _a lot_ more than kids overall: fancy
         | cars, homes, holidays etc. More expensive things are also nicer
         | than their cheaper counterparts but I think most people would
         | be lying if they don't say having access to them also gives
         | them some status boost, if only internally. Can't turn off the
         | monkey in the head easily.
        
         | chinchilla2020 wrote:
         | I agree that this is a middle school level analysis, but I've
         | seen it a couple times in practice during my career.
         | 
         | 1. In the dating scene, I have heard women remark that it was a
         | red flag (Android users are stereotypically poor... despite a
         | large number of techies using Android)
         | 
         | 2. A manager at my old company was advised to get an iphone for
         | communication with VCs. One of our old leaders had heard
         | commentary from a VC at one point about the text message
         | colors.
        
           | nakedrobot2 wrote:
           | Both are good reasons to avoid such toxic people. VC's
           | especially.
        
             | sicp-enjoyer wrote:
             | I think courting VCs already involves sacrificing your
             | pride and doing a song and dance. Why not do a small easy
             | thing to help close the sale?
        
               | NickC25 wrote:
               | Because a VC that is more concerned with the type of
               | phone you use than your product/service/company is
               | probably a VC you should stay away from.
               | 
               | Imagine explaining to investors in your VC - "You know
               | that XYZ company that just IPO'd for several billion
               | dollars? Yeah I passed on their series A because the
               | founder didn't have an iPhone despite the business itself
               | being really solid". If I was an investor in that VC I'd
               | sue the partners into the ground over such trivial
               | bullshit.
        
               | sicp-enjoyer wrote:
               | I completely agree with the sentiment, but i'm sure deals
               | are made on less trivial factors all the time. They just
               | aren't explicitly stated.
        
               | NickC25 wrote:
               | Yeah, but the whole point is that if it IS explicitly
               | stated or even implied, then the whole concept of a VC's
               | fiduciary duty to its investors gets thrown out the
               | window because of some partner's personal biases that
               | have no impact on a given company or product. That's
               | unethical and dubious at best, and illegal or outright
               | fraud at worst. All because someone didn't like that
               | someone else was using a different kind of phone. That's
               | nuts if you think about it.
        
               | yamazakiwi wrote:
               | If a VC finds importance in a specific song and dance you
               | find silly, I would take that as a signal of their market
               | and technology understanding.
               | 
               | Some topics can be deal breakers, you don't have to marry
               | the first VC you talk to, or court them all.
        
           | 4gotunameagain wrote:
        
             | joecot wrote:
             | It has nothing to do with "toxic femininity", it's
             | classism. And no one's "banning" you from using this term,
             | you're just getting downvoted for your performative "Cancel
             | Culture" signalling.
        
               | 4gotunameagain wrote:
               | yes it does. It is well known that women have a
               | proclivity to climb the social ladder and marry upwards,
               | therefore desiring wealth etc. Duckduckgo hypergamy.
               | 
               | I obviously used the term in a sarcastic manner, to show
               | how stupid it is, together with its sister term
        
               | derac wrote:
               | This seems to be related to both gender roles and class.
               | The culture around the male role in a diadic relationship
               | is classist. I wouldn't use the term toxic femininity,
               | but I think in spirit it has some merit. The complaining
               | about what words you "can say" is annoying for sure.
        
               | hallway_monitor wrote:
               | Agree - you would _never_ see a man turning down a woman
               | because she had a different phone.
        
               | kyledamon wrote:
               | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32765884
               | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32766935
               | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32766998
        
               | smegsicle wrote:
               | three links to the same metrosexual?
        
           | romeoblade wrote:
           | > despite a large number of techies using Android
           | 
           | I use an iPhone. Not for any philosophical reason. I tried
           | switching to android 3 times over the years since the first
           | iPhone came out. Same plan, same provider, grandfathered in,
           | same house, same spot. Each android phone did not get the
           | same level of cell service in my house as the iPhone. I have
           | side gigs I do contracting for, I have had cases of missing
           | calls where the androids have literally cost me $100's of
           | dollars, phone didn't ring... just a voicemail notification
           | showing up hours later.
           | 
           | After the 3rd attempt, last being a nexus 5, I gave up. I'm
           | sorry but I draw a line when a device messes with my income
           | regardless of my ideological stance on open source and not
           | having a windows device or even an Apple laptop in the house
           | for the last 13 years.
           | 
           | With that said the Pixel 7 Pro looks nice, and I would love
           | to give it a try but I'll only do that if I have it on a
           | separate dedicated line to try out besides my main one that
           | have had for 20 years. Not sure it's worth the effort at this
           | point.
        
           | protomyth wrote:
           | Its ever so fun to have to deal with middle school with green
           | bubbles. Apple is directly responsible for some kids getting
           | bullied, but I guess it works out for them since we had to
           | buy some more Apple devices.
        
             | computerfriend wrote:
             | What? No. Apple is at best _indirectly_ responsible.
        
               | protomyth wrote:
               | Apple knows exactly what coloring the bubble differently
               | will do. The bully is just a marketing instrument to the
               | Apple executives. Normally, I would blame only the bully,
               | but this seems willful on Apple's part. They want kids to
               | feel bad and tell their parents they need an iPhone. They
               | don't give a damn that they're just another point of
               | friction in people's days.
        
               | rosnd wrote:
               | Do you think there would be less bullying in a world
               | without different coloured bubbles?
               | 
               | Do you think the bubbles _cause_ bullying?
               | 
               | I'd imagine the bubbles are just an excuse, which would
               | immediately be replaced with something else in their
               | absence.
        
               | protomyth wrote:
               | _Do you think there would be less bullying in a world
               | without different coloured bubbles?_
               | 
               | If the Apple's own messages were the same color as SMS or
               | other avenues and Apple made a best faith effort to make
               | sure messages worked, then there would be one less avenue
               | of bullying.
               | 
               |  _Do you think the bubbles cause bullying?_
               | 
               | Yep. Its status and a lot of bullying comes from the
               | world reaffirming your status over others.
               | 
               |  _I 'd imagine the bubbles are just an excuse, which
               | would immediately be replaced with something else in
               | their absence._
               | 
               | Maybe, but it wouldn't be Apple's fault.
        
               | spoils19 wrote:
               | What? No. Apple is directly responsible, like the GP
               | said.
        
               | wewtyflakes wrote:
               | Wouldn't the bully be the one directly responsible?
        
               | jeremy0x4a wrote:
               | The modern bully demands all lunch money be submitted via
               | Apple Cash, or else.
        
           | nineteen999 wrote:
           | > 1. In the dating scene, I have heard women remark that it
           | was a red flag (Android users are stereotypically poor...
           | despite a large number of techies using Android)
           | 
           | This is a red flag against the women in question, not the
           | Android user. That attitude/behaviour is a great indicator of
           | a gold digger. You'd be dodging a bullet by avoiding these
           | women.
           | 
           | The only other people that share that attitude are teenagers.
           | So if you go along with this horseshit and buy an iPhone just
           | to feel more comfortable dating, you're courting women with
           | the maturity and intelligence of the average teenager.
        
           | reaperducer wrote:
           | _A manager at my old company was advised to get an iphone for
           | communication with VCs._
           | 
           | This doesn't seem very different from a Director of Sales
           | telling the salespeople to upgrade their wardrobe.
           | 
           | Image is important in business. Some people may be
           | uncomfortable with that, but it's a fact. Companies, and
           | people, spend trillions of dollars a year to project an
           | image.
           | 
           | It just happens that blue text bubbles are more in style than
           | green text bubbles.
           | 
           | But Google fell into the same trap that all large companies
           | do: If you can't innovate, litigate.
        
           | solardev wrote:
           | 1. Joke's on them. I just got a new iPhone and now my net
           | worth is even more negative than it was before!
        
           | brokenmachine wrote:
           | Not understanding that they've already been manipulated by
           | Apple is a (slight) red flag to me.
        
           | lupire wrote:
           | #1 is great. A gold digger (and a low intelligence one at
           | that) waving their red flag at first contact.
        
             | artificialLimbs wrote:
             | The vast majority of women would rather have a successful
             | man as a mate than the alternative.
        
               | selfhoster11 wrote:
               | Yes, because Android is only for the poors and the rich
               | universally use the iPhone without exception.
               | 
               | You're on HN. Half of us use Android.
        
               | smegsicle wrote:
               | so probably a red flag if you are not successful
        
               | valarauko wrote:
               | Not in question. I guess the issue is that SMS bubble
               | color is such a weak indicator of success that it should
               | call into question somebody who regards it as noteworthy.
        
               | Mikeb85 wrote:
               | The parent is saying that the choice of phone is a poor
               | indicator of success (likely because Androids can cost
               | just as much as the most expensive iPhone and vice versa,
               | old iPhones can cost as little as the shittiest Android).
        
             | notyourday wrote:
             | No, #1 is "this is his burner number"
        
           | golergka wrote:
           | > Android users are stereotypically poor... despite a large
           | number of techies using Android
           | 
           | I haven't lived in a country where text bubbles used to be a
           | thing, but I noticed this. People, even people who are smart
           | and kind in other aspects, still cling to the easiest social
           | cues. Doesn't matter if you wear a Margiela t-shirt or what
           | you drive; your tinder date or a person who you just met in a
           | bar will look at your phone and take notice. Personally, I
           | was quite happy with Samsung flagship phones, and then not
           | less happy with pretty cheap Xiaomi ones -- they literally do
           | anything I want in a phone. But after getting frustrated with
           | how people read social cues, I moved back to iPhones and
           | simply got myself the most expensive one, just for the sake
           | of being easier to read for other people.
           | 
           | Obviously, it would be nice to be so laidback and independent
           | as to not care what other people care about your wealth, but
           | sadly, I'm not on that level yet.
        
             | computerfriend wrote:
             | It's the opposite. You're now missing out on the valuable
             | signal of whether someone is obsessed with wealth and class
             | or not.
        
               | sangnoir wrote:
               | I have ascended to the even more-conceited plane of "I
               | don't bother with social signifiers" (which ironically is
               | a signifier in itself- but in my case, I mostly _do not
               | care_ ). Then again, I'm not currently in the dating
               | pool, so YMMV
        
               | feet wrote:
               | I know you aren't the GP, but if you didn't care would
               | you buy an iPhone for social reasons?
        
               | orangecat wrote:
               | Women who are in their 20s or 30s and at least moderately
               | attractive are deluged with male attention. It's not
               | necessarily irrational for them to use quick and dirty
               | filters, even if that often produces false positives.
        
             | Mikeb85 wrote:
             | Well, might as well get a BMW and Rolex now...
        
           | mrep wrote:
           | I've legit had 1 girl say "I don't know about these green
           | bubbles" after we started texting...
        
             | lupire wrote:
             | How did it end? Was she worth an iPhone?
        
               | mrep wrote:
               | We ended up going on a date still but it did make me
               | raise my eyebrows.
        
           | umanwizard wrote:
           | > a large number of techies using Android
           | 
           | This doesn't match my experience. Almost everyone I work with
           | has an iPhone.
           | 
           | Anyway, having a good income isn't the whole story. It's
           | probably also about willingness to conform to subtle,
           | arbitrary social norms. Plenty of women are more attracted to
           | a guy who dresses well, despite the fact that plenty of
           | techies wear free hoodies. I think that's a better analogy.
        
             | ericd wrote:
             | Many of the best technical people I know use Android. Of
             | course, they're also not generally using SMS, they tend to
             | use eg Signal.
        
             | tfehring wrote:
             | I think using Android can be either a low income signal or
             | a Grey Tribe [0] cultural signal, and people on dating
             | sites might want to screen out either (or both).
             | 
             | Like you said, it's about arbitrary norms, but we make
             | assumptions about others all the time based on which norms
             | we follow. An analogy from a different angle is that
             | texting your Tinder match from an Android phone is a bit
             | like applying for a tech job with a @hotmail.com email
             | address.
             | 
             | [0] https://slatestarcodex.com/2014/09/30/i-can-tolerate-
             | anythin...
        
               | jcelerier wrote:
               | .. people use SMS on tinder ? I had overall a couple
               | hundred matches and going through classic text has been
               | exceedingly rare, 80% of the time conversations move on
               | to instagram, and otherwise to fb messenger or whatsapp
        
               | mrep wrote:
               | Guessing you are not in the US? I am and all matches I
               | have had on hinge have moved onto text and I have had a
               | girl comment on the green bubbles. I don't even have fb
               | messenger or whatsapp installed.
        
               | jcelerier wrote:
               | Yes, France (and Canada where I moved recently looks like
               | the same so far)
        
           | ilrwbwrkhv wrote:
           | Those VCs are the VCs you don't want money from anyway.
        
         | greenbub1 wrote:
         | > This deep integration with colours and status symbols does
         | remain in specific areas like middle school where it is still
         | seen as important to try to project wealth.
         | 
         | Are the kids wrong?
         | 
         | When I look at my app's stats, Android users are worse in every
         | way.
         | 
         | More expensive to develop for, pay less or none at all, and
         | their halo effect is sometimes negative: they might word-of-
         | mouth my app to more Android users instead of more iOS users.
        
           | denismurphy wrote:
           | > More expensive to develop for
           | 
           | As iOS developer i disagree, You can develop android app on
           | any platform that support JDK you pay a one-time registration
           | fee of EUR25, Google Play is faster at approving apps
           | (anecdotal evidence from working on team that support both
           | iOS and Android)
           | 
           | iOS apps have to be compiled on recent Mac with latest
           | version of macOS, you pay a yearly fee of EUR100 and AppStore
           | review process is more in-dept especially for new apps
        
             | lupire wrote:
             | Not saying Apple deserves the $100, am saying that's not
             | the expensive part of app dev.
        
           | williamscales wrote:
           | All I can say is that there are dozens of us! who pay for
           | Android apps.
           | 
           | > pay less or none at all
           | 
           | Maybe just make the app paid only?
        
           | vachina wrote:
           | > pay less or none at all
           | 
           | Maybe because there is always a free alternative that is
           | better than yours.
           | 
           | Whereas iOS users only has the App Store, and if they don't
           | pay they don't get app.
        
             | samatman wrote:
             | Keep telling yourself a paycheck has no affect on app
             | quality if it makes you feel better.
        
               | candiodari wrote:
               | You can make everyone equal (and thereby eliminate
               | "status") by making everyone worse off. For a lot of
               | things that's exactly the choice society makes.
        
             | mfru wrote:
             | I love how Anki is free on Android but paid on iOS. (Apple
             | tax gets a totally new meaning here)
        
         | seanalltogether wrote:
         | Yeah all my group conversations in Ireland are on whatsapp now,
         | but I think this is mostly due to the fact that carriers still
         | charge extra to send photos over sms. It's just not worth it to
         | use sms anymore.
        
       | malshe wrote:
       | This is a clickbait. On my iPhone the green color is much darker
       | than what the author shows in the article. Here are some images
       | with the hex color codes for example:
       | 
       | https://imgur.com/a/7k5dMtm
        
         | tpmx wrote:
         | A comparison between blue and green bubbles on your phone would
         | be more relevant. Color space handling makes direct comparisons
         | between screen grabs (from different devices) tricky.
        
           | malshe wrote:
           | The author used the screen grabs from different places too.
           | On iPhone you can't have the blue and green bubbles side by
           | side
        
             | tpmx wrote:
             | A reasonable start would be screen grabs of both blue and
             | green bubbles, grabbed from the same phone in the same way.
             | (And vertical placement; see the other comment.)
        
         | zzot wrote:
         | It's actually really cherry-picked samples. All messages (blue
         | and green) in the Messages app fade out slightly as you scroll.
         | The author picked a blue message from the bottom of the screen
         | and a green one from the top. If only they scrolled around a
         | bit... they would have noticed.
        
           | malshe wrote:
           | Great point. I just now confirmed that as well. The bottom
           | message is much darker than the one on top
        
           | s3p wrote:
           | Also the article doesn't mention that the iMessage blue
           | _also_ fails the same WCAG test. I just ran it myself.
        
             | bmicraft wrote:
             | As shown in the image, the blue at least passes the test
             | for "large text"
        
         | gigglesupstairs wrote:
         | Here are the results for your image. Contrast still fails on
         | WCAG guidelines.
         | 
         | https://ibb.co/sKfrZ16
        
         | pixelnudger wrote:
         | Your hex value was sampled from a screenshot taken in dark
         | mode, and actual color values are slightly different between
         | dark and light mode.
        
           | s3p wrote:
           | This is not true. I just sampled green bubbles from both dark
           | mode and light mode iOS _and_ macOS and got the same hex of
           | 34c759.
        
       | umanwizard wrote:
       | > This segmentation has then evolved into discrimination against
       | green bubbles, especially among young smartphone users in the
       | U.S1.
       | 
       | The footnote is a link to a WSJ article that doesn't back up that
       | sentence at all, i.e. makes no claim that the issue is most
       | prevalent in the US.
        
       | aoeusnth1 wrote:
       | Besides the cherry-picked colors of green from the top of the
       | screen, the author assumes turning up the screen brightness
       | reduces contrast in the same way that applying a brightness
       | filter in photoshop does. That's obviously not true - a given
       | colorspace has less dynamic range if you make everything brighter
       | in photoshop, but turning up your screen backlight brightness
       | makes everything brighter by a constant factor, which doesn't
       | change the dynamic range.
        
         | sliken wrote:
         | Assuming a perfect screen, yes. But at some point the brightest
         | pixels on the screen will get no brighter, but all the other
         | pixels will. So the dynamic range decreases. Similar happens
         | when dim enough.
        
           | aoeusnth1 wrote:
           | Does a blank white screen not get brighter on your phone when
           | you turn up the brightness?
        
             | sliken wrote:
             | I have a pixel 6 pro, and it does look like I can't wash
             | out the brightest.
             | 
             | However on a grey scale test image I can lose the bottom
             | 1/3rd of the range by going too dark. Maybe the brightness
             | cap is to save battery.
        
           | machinawhite wrote:
           | I just checked and there's a significant difference between
           | full brightness and a little less than full brightness so
           | I'll just assume the screens Apple is using are pretty good
           | at that
        
       | travisgriggs wrote:
       | This article is weird to me. On one hand, it's interesting
       | science about color perception. Good stuff.
       | 
       | But on the other hand, it assumes an unsubstantiated motive for
       | why it is as it is. I've worked with designers a bunch, and they
       | have all kinds of reasons for why they choose as they do. I would
       | not put this past apple at all. But given there's no quotes from
       | the original designers, I'd go with "Do no attribute to malice
       | that which you can attribute to incompetence."
        
         | nerdponx wrote:
         | > Do not attribute to malice that which you can attribute to
         | incompetence.
         | 
         | IMO this is only good advice there's no obvious motive for
         | malice.
         | 
         | When big corporations are involved, cynicism is absolutely
         | warranted.
        
       | ogab wrote:
       | As noted in one of the article comments: One of the first
       | settings I change on my iPhone is "Accessibility > Display & Text
       | Size > Increase Contrast" for this very reason. It darkens both
       | the blue iMessage and green SMS colors, but I mostly do it
       | because I do find that green color "gross" and
       | annoying/distracting.
        
       | nrvn wrote:
       | I have just compared the "gross" bubble from the article with my
       | "real" bubble. Made a screenshot of both and used the ios color
       | picker.
       | 
       | "Gross": #7EC170
       | 
       | Real from the bottom of the message reel: #65C466
       | 
       | Real from the top: #73E173
       | 
       | No issues with contrast in either case. Also keep in mind that
       | those color hexes will slightly vary depending on where exactly
       | you decide to pick since bubbles are filled with gradients.
       | 
       | Not sure where author gets his bubble from but in real life they
       | look as "good" bubbles at the bottom of the screen that makes me
       | think the article itself is gross.
        
         | abracadaniel wrote:
         | It's worth pointing out that text message bubbles were always
         | green from the first iPhone as well. Coloring iMessages as blue
         | was done so you knew whether you were getting billed for that
         | text or not.
        
         | simonh wrote:
         | I'm not so sure, I just looked at some chats in iMessage, both
         | to other iPhones and Android phones, and there's no doubt to me
         | that the blue bubbles give much better contrast and
         | readability, even comparing only messages at the bottom of the
         | screen.
        
         | somedude895 wrote:
         | Yeah seems really far-fetched. The whole idea that Apple did
         | the green bubbles with the purpose of branding kids with
         | Android phones as poor as some way of bullying them into
         | getting an iPhone is borderline conspiracy theorist, possibly
         | stemming from some anti-capitalist sentiment.
         | 
         | It's kids being kids and seems like an exclusively US thing.
        
       | leobg wrote:
       | Might it might it not also be just conditioning? Users have
       | learned to associate green messages with all of the limitations
       | that SMS impose. Hence they perceive it as bad. If that was true,
       | they could've picked a higher contrast version instead, and
       | people would still feel the same way.
        
         | jaywalk wrote:
         | Correct. Users don't need any color tricks to associate SMS
         | with reduced functionality.
        
       | bfgoodrich wrote:
        
       | alfor wrote:
       | I dislike most Apple software even if I like their hardware.
       | 
       | From Itune and podcast that always try to sell me something
       | instead of just letting me use my library to mail or safari to
       | iCloud.
       | 
       | Seems to me they are good at pushing the boundaries in hardware
       | and integration, but the software make me run in the other
       | direction.
       | 
       | Is there value in their software?
        
       | IYasha wrote:
       | The bubble chat interface itself is gross. Terrible. Disgusting.
       | Unusable. Distracting. Eye-hurting. Illogical. Counterproductive.
       | Log-unfriendly. Code-offensive. Intolerable. Since day one.
        
         | snarf21 wrote:
         | Serious question: What would be better? What would that look
         | like?
         | 
         | (I think the current one is perfect for 1:1 conversations ..
         | Multiple people is more of an issue visually)
        
           | stjohnswarts wrote:
           | A lot of people won't be happy until their phone is just a
           | bash terminal.
        
       | isitmadeofglass wrote:
       | I really hate this conspiracy. Before iMessage all messages on
       | iPhones where green. And when they needed to differentiate they
       | chose to make the new ones blue.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2022-10-12 23:02 UTC)