[HN Gopher] Leonardo Syndrome
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Leonardo Syndrome
        
       Author : memorable
       Score  : 74 points
       Date   : 2022-10-04 08:50 UTC (2 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (thoughtfulatlas.bearblog.dev)
 (TXT) w3m dump (thoughtfulatlas.bearblog.dev)
        
       | Sophistifunk wrote:
       | This isn't a "syndrome" it's normal adaptive behaviour. Like
       | everything you encounter in the real world, 80% of everything you
       | decide to start doesn't actually need to be finished. Sometimes
       | you need to start something in order to learn you're not willing
       | to pay the price to have it finished, or you don't really need
       | it.
        
       | simonsarris wrote:
       | I get the author's point but this is kind of an odd read. He did
       | finish the horse inasmuch as possible. He made full clay models.
       | He never completed it only because Ludovico needed the bronze to
       | make cannons for defense instead. But that's not his fault.
       | 
       | And making experimental paints that happened to not last very
       | long is also not a failure to finish something. It's just an
       | experiment.
       | 
       | > misunderstanding several aspects of the heart
       | 
       | These few words don't really give his work justice. He
       | discovered/theorized how the aortic valve and its leaflets worked
       | that was correct and wasn't really conclusively proved for
       | another 400 years. (He was nonetheless wrong about blood
       | circulation, generally)
       | 
       | > to the Mona Lisa - which in itself is unfinished
       | 
       | I don't know. He worked on it for 4 years, taking it with him
       | everywhere, and if it is really unfinished it may be because his
       | right hand was simply starting to paralyze. There's more to be
       | said about perfectionism in the Mona Lisa than Leonardo syndrome.
       | 
       | Leonardo definitely started far more than he could finish
       | (disappointing a lot of patrons), and had a somewhat self-
       | aggrandizing streak in what he claimed he could do, but the
       | examples here are not super accurate. As much as I wasn't crazy
       | about the Walter Isaacson bio its worth reading if you want a
       | better picture of his accomplishments and failures.
       | 
       | At the end of the day he is remembered because he did actually
       | have a very large set of detailed ideas, drawings, plans, and
       | accomplishments. Most of us would love to have created a work of
       | art as unfinished as the Mona Lisa.
        
         | hirundo wrote:
         | Syndrome implies malady. Better words for this style as applied
         | to Leonardo would be Power/Capacity/Knack/Talent/Aptitude.
        
           | jebarker wrote:
           | There is a malady that looks like this where someone is just
           | flaky or incompetent. But then it probably shouldn't be named
           | after Leonardo if he was actually displaying genius levels of
           | knowing when to quit.
        
         | svat wrote:
         | On the other hand, there are many reports that Leonardo himself
         | lamented not finishing things, and wrote "Tell me if anything
         | was ever done" in his notebooks.
         | 
         | (I don't know the full context of this--searching online
         | suggests the original was "Dimmi se mai fu fatta alcuna cosa"--
         | but as you yourself say, Leonardo was prone to perfectionism
         | and starting far more than he could finish and had a reputation
         | for disappointing patrons, which seems to fit well with the
         | author's main point, even if the example of the horse doesn't.)
        
       | black_13 wrote:
       | He was still Leonardo.
        
       | f1shy wrote:
       | >> Leonardo da Vinci himself. Despite being one of the most
       | famous polymaths and creators in history - who doesn't know about
       | him?! - he was also somebody prone to failure.
       | 
       | I actually prefer to think to myself: failure is not even trying.
       | If not, I would not start many things and finish few, but never
       | start anything at all...
        
       | teddyh wrote:
       | Charles Babbage may be a more fitting example:
       | 
       |  _In the first room I saw the parts of the original Calculating
       | Machine, which had been shown in an incomplete state many years
       | before and had even been put to some use. I asked him about its
       | present form. "I have not finished it because in working at it I
       | came on the idea of my Analytical Engine, which would do all that
       | it was capable of doing and much more. Indeed the idea was so
       | much simpler that it would have taken more work to complete the
       | calculating machine than to design and construct the other in its
       | entirety, so I turned my attention to the Analytical Machine."
       | After a few minutes' talk we went into the next workroom where he
       | showed and explained to me the working of the elements of the
       | Analytical Machine. I asked if I could see it. "I have never
       | completed it," he said, "because I hit upon the idea of doing the
       | same thing by a different and far more effective method, and this
       | rendered it useless to proceed on the old lines." Then we went
       | into the third room. There lay scattered bits of mechanism but I
       | saw no trace of any working machine. Very cautiously I approached
       | the subject, and received the dreaded answer, "It is not
       | constructed yet, but I am working at it, and will take less time
       | to construct it altogether than it would have taken to complete
       | the Analytical Machine from the stage in which I left it." I took
       | leave of the old man with a heavy heart._
       | 
       | -- John Fletcher Moulton, 1914
        
         | bee_rider wrote:
         | It is however somewhat reassuring to know that something like
         | feature creep or second system syndrome predates the digital
         | computer.
        
           | dariusj18 wrote:
           | Sounds like someone needed a Scrum master
        
             | leetrout wrote:
             | If he had invented sprints before inventing computing
             | devices he would have been able to more readily deliver
             | shareholder value.
        
         | LtWorf wrote:
         | I read somewhere that he had problems into obtaining parts
         | manufactured with enough precision and that he was using wood
         | and that was terrible
         | 
         | They did fashion them in modern times, from the designs, and it
         | seems they did work.
        
           | Kye wrote:
           | This seems similar to the problem we have with fusion. We
           | know how to do it, but the materials for sustaining it just
           | aren't there yet.
        
         | peteradio wrote:
         | Sounds like he was working with agility! Do just enough work to
         | find out you're building the wrong thing so that it informs
         | your next attempt. Repeat!
        
       | CobrastanJorji wrote:
       | > Examples of his failure include not successfully squaring the
       | circle
       | 
       | Seems kind of mean to attack a guy for failing to finish
       | something later proven to be impossible.
        
         | hirundo wrote:
         | DaVinci is in good company. Another such slacker was Newton,
         | who spent all of that time on alchemy but never did transmute
         | lead into gold.
        
           | sidewndr46 wrote:
           | For Newton to be interested in alchemy loosely makes sense,
           | given the time frame.
           | 
           | I don't really understand much about Jung, but apparently
           | towards the end of his life he became increasingly interested
           | in alchemy. He published on it quite a bit. It's a really
           | weird chapter in his legacy.
        
             | lioeters wrote:
             | Alchemy is another expression, a symbolic language, as part
             | of a larger mythological and psychological journey in
             | Jung's life and inner world.
             | 
             | > Jung referred to his imaginative or visionary venture
             | during these years as "my most difficult experiment." This
             | experiment involved a voluntary confrontation with the
             | unconscious through wilful engagement of what Jung later
             | termed "mythopoetic imagination".
             | 
             | > From December 1913 onward, he carried on in the same
             | procedure: deliberately evoking a fantasy in a waking
             | state, and then entering into it as into a drama. These
             | fantasies may be understood as a type of dramatized
             | thinking in pictorial form... In retrospect, he recalled
             | that his scientific question was to see what took place
             | when he switched off consciousness. The example of dreams
             | indicated the existence of background activity, and he
             | wanted to give this a possibility of emerging, just as one
             | does when taking mescaline.
             | 
             | > Jung initially recorded his "visions", or "fantasies, or
             | "imaginations"--all terms used by Jung to describe his
             | activity -- in a series of six journals.
             | 
             | > ..In 1957, near the end of his life, Jung spoke about the
             | Red Book and the process which yielded it; in that
             | interview he stated:
             | 
             | > The years ... when I pursued the inner images, were the
             | most important time of my life. Everything else is to be
             | derived from this. It began at that time, and the later
             | details hardly matter anymore. My entire life consisted in
             | elaborating what had burst forth from the unconscious and
             | flooded me like an enigmatic stream and threatened to break
             | me. That was the stuff and material for more than only one
             | life. Everything later was merely the outer classification,
             | scientific elaboration, and the integration into life. But
             | the numinous beginning, which contained everything, was
             | then.
             | 
             | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Red_Book_(Jung)
        
           | lioeters wrote:
           | Ah, would that we aspire to achieve and accomplish even a
           | fraction of such glorious, brilliant failures.
        
       | ChrisMarshallNY wrote:
       | Finishing _(i.e. shipping)_ stuff is a pain.
       | 
       | At some point, we reach the part where the fun stuff is done.
       | We've learned pretty much everything we can, from the exercise,
       | and it's "90%" done.
       | 
       | That last 10%, however, is a _bear_. Many, many folks never
       | bother with it.
       | 
       | In a lot of cases, that's fine. The main purpose was learning,
       | and there's really not enough "market pull" to justify finishing
       | the project.
       | 
       | If there is a requirement to see it through to completion (like,
       | say, a contract, with your signature on it), then we need to
       | complete that last 10%, even if it's boring.
       | 
       | There's a joke: _" 90% of the project is completed in 10% of the
       | time. 10% of the project is completed in 90% of the time."_
       | (there are many variants, thereof).
       | 
       | Ever notice how, when a new building is going up, it appears to
       | be "complete," in an astonishingly short time? Then, it's twice
       | as long, before the doors open?
       | 
       | That's because making the exterior and structure is
       | straightforward, and can be done by just about anyone. Framing,
       | windows, doors, roofing, masonry, etc., are skills, but not
       | extremely specialized.
       | 
       | The interior stuff, though, requires a _lot_ of skill. You can 't
       | just bring in some half-trained hammer monkey. You need the
       | experienced finish carpenters, and the expensive painters, etc.
       | These folks are harder to schedule, and won't rush the job. Their
       | work is what people will see, up close, every day, so it needs a
       | lot of polish, and has to be robust.
       | 
       | Same with any product.
       | 
       | I'm writing an SDK, right now. It was probably 90% complete, last
       | week, but I wrote a pretty beefy test harness for it, and I am
       | now implementing a whole bunch of "live server" unit tests. I am
       | finding bugs in my implementation (I always do), and I'm fixing
       | them, as I go along. I'm also encountering the "little things,"
       | that I forgot to implement.
       | 
       | Once I have the unit tests all humming along to my satisfaction
       | (I tend to write unit tests after the fact, for SDKs. I write
       | about that here[0]), I'll flesh out the documentation.
       | 
       | Only then, when I can release the project as a standalone
       | package, will I return to the main app, that is my initial
       | consumer of the SDK, and I'll need to integrate it; replacing an
       | older SDK (that I also wrote).
       | 
       | Lot of boring stuff, but it means that I don't have to worry
       | about this very critical (and dicey) communication
       | infrastructure, when working on the main app.
       | 
       | [0] https://littlegreenviper.com/blah-blah-blah/testing-
       | harness-...
        
       | alecfreudenberg wrote:
       | These kind of people just do what they want. They have no
       | internal obligation to complete a project, even if they at some
       | point agreed to it.
       | 
       | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r-QW-0yi86c
        
       | dqpb wrote:
       | Breadth First Search
        
       | 1970-01-01 wrote:
       | >Examples of his failures included not successfully squaring the
       | circle, multiple engineering designs that didn't work such as a
       | giant crossbow and a flying machine, misunderstanding several
       | aspects of the heart, and experimental painting designs that
       | resulted in the slow degradation of a painting.
       | 
       | The author is counting experiments and learning as failures. The
       | squared circle is outright impossible. Only when expectations are
       | set to God on Earth is Leo a "failure".
        
       | paulpauper wrote:
       | Yahoo/Google/Microsoft syndrome: the tendency to arbitrarily
       | cancel projects without warning, usually after an acquisition is
       | made.
        
       | 2devnull wrote:
       | We're broken by the language: work vs play is a bad distinction.
       | When you apply criterion from "work" to "play" it appears as
       | though there are many failures and false starts. We should do
       | both, and at the same time.
        
       | DerekBickerton wrote:
       | I think I have Leonardo Syndrome. The Internet being so vast,
       | there's countless things to try out and hack away at, and I have
       | countless unfinished projects hoarded away on my hard-drives. I'm
       | not actually a hoarder in the typical sense of keeping old
       | newspapers for posterity and I'm actually a minimalist, but when
       | it comes to my digital life: the ease of being able to keep
       | mountains of the proverbial 'old newspapers' is magnified a
       | trillion^trillion times.
       | 
       | Leonardo would be paralyzed by the modern web. I find myself also
       | becoming like a magpie, gathering little snippets of code that
       | one day may come in handy, and my bookmarks are overflowing with
       | interesting actionable URLs that I plan to revisit _someday_. I
       | 'm a digital hoarder who likes to procrastinate a lot. Probably
       | need to change that, or is this a natural response to the sheer
       | vastness of the web and the only sane way to approach it?
        
         | bob1029 wrote:
         | I certainly have it, but I think there are ways to fight back.
         | 
         | Github and strictly source-controlling all my personal projects
         | has done wonders for my progress.
         | 
         | The crappy part still is when you hit a blocker and really have
         | to bust your ass to get through it. The temptation to go
         | sideways and do something else is extremely strong when you
         | don't have a business owner standing behind you.
        
         | leetrout wrote:
         | I could have written the same comment!
         | 
         | I leave incomplete projects when I have gotten what I want from
         | them. Many times it is just for exposure to a library or
         | language or pattern.
         | 
         | I learn by doing so to fully grok something I have to use it
         | which leads to this situation.
        
           | pfyra wrote:
           | Who's to say that the projects are incomplete if you have
           | achieved what you wanted from them? Sounds very much complete
           | to me, even though the final result might not be useful to
           | anyone else.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2022-10-06 23:01 UTC)