[HN Gopher] Early Cormac McCarthy Interviews Rediscovered
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Early Cormac McCarthy Interviews Rediscovered
        
       Author : samclemens
       Score  : 79 points
       Date   : 2022-10-01 04:30 UTC (4 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.nytimes.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.nytimes.com)
        
       | wellthisisgreat wrote:
       | Holy shit, McCarthy has a new novel coming out Oct 25! Mark the
       | day guys.
        
       | rspeele wrote:
       | I read post after post of gushing praise for Cormac McCarthy, so
       | I bought _The Road_ on Kindle a few years ago. A few pages in I
       | wished I had bought a hardcopy -- the e-book seemed to have been
       | badly OCRed, and was missing most of the punctuation and a few of
       | the spaces.
       | 
       | Another few pages later, I looked up whether other people had the
       | same problem. I was surprised to find that there was no issue
       | with the Kindle copy. That's just how McCarthy writes. Although
       | it's no secret, most people don't mention it -- somehow it had
       | never come up in any of the glowing reviews I'd read. It's not
       | been mentioned in any of the 30-ish comments in this thread so
       | far.
       | 
       | Now, it's a little thing, so it shouldn't bug me so much. But it
       | did.
       | 
       | When I read a work of fiction, I do not want to be thinking about
       | _the writer_ or his stylistic choices. My brain 's little
       | imagination engine should be cranking away, running the
       | projector, imagining the characters speaking, moving, thinking,
       | and feeling. Words from the page flow into it like fuel.
       | 
       | With McCarthy, the engine would snarl and grind every time I hit
       | some ugly looking naked contraction like "werent" or "didnt", or
       | a bit of unquoted dialog that I didn't realize was a character
       | speaking until the end of the sentence. The projector skipped a
       | frame, and for that moment I was no longer thinking of "The Man"
       | or "The Boy", but involuntarily thinking of "The Author" and his
       | smug need to be special, to remind me of his presence, to prove
       | that the rules of language are beneath him.
       | 
       | Ironically, the justifications I have read for this style are
       | that it's _supposed_ to flow more naturally. Apparently
       | punctuation is unnecessary, baroque, and only slows the reader
       | down. Perhaps many readers agree with that, but I don 't. I've
       | spent most of my life reading English that was written according
       | to standard rules of grammar, so it parses readily. McCarthy's
       | "house rules" grammar does not.
       | 
       | That all leaves a question. I finished _The Road_ and found it to
       | be OK. Would I have _loved_ it, had it been written in
       | conventional style? Still probably not. But at least I wouldn 't
       | be annoyed at the author.
        
         | piyh wrote:
         | The thing that stuck with me after reading The Road was the
         | crushing sadness. I finished the book on my honeymoon at
         | midnight and cried for a long time.
        
         | asdfqweqe12 wrote:
         | You got filtered.
        
         | mellosouls wrote:
         | Your "meta" criticism is fair, and it's something I would
         | normally bridle at as well, but in McCarthy's case, it just has
         | me hooked, though it takes a while to get into the flow.
         | 
         | In a less artificial way you could say the same about any
         | writing that reads as non-standard, for instance it took me a
         | long time to appreciate Shakespeare coming from a familiarity
         | with modern English, but eventually I got it and it was life-
         | changing.
         | 
         | Obviously in McCarthy's case there is a "problem" of intent,
         | but I think if you can replace your suspicion with an
         | assumption of artistic good faith, you may be able to relax
         | into the flow more easily.
        
           | rspeele wrote:
           | I believe you hit the nail on the head with the whole problem
           | of intent thing. I can enjoy reading antiquated works written
           | in antiquated style, like Shakespeare, because I know that
           | they were made in an effective way for the time. I get over
           | it, I get used to it, I move on. Kind of similar to watching
           | a black & white movie, for example Dr. Strangelove is one of
           | my favorite movies of all time and it doesn't need to be
           | colorized or remade. Even a movie made in B&W after color
           | became standard, like Schindler's List, I can understand the
           | effect the creators are going for. But if somebody came out
           | with a movie where they did something wacky like _invert_ all
           | the colors for no apparent reason, I would find it annoying
           | and distracting.
           | 
           | It does lead to a fun hypothetical. If Cormac McCarthy was a
           | dead author from the nth century, and his writing style was
           | the way _everybody_ wrote in the nth century, I wouldn 't
           | hold it against him. I would probably be able to get used to
           | it, and quit muttering "this son of a bitch" aloud every two
           | pages. Although I still doubt I would be a huge fan, I likely
           | would be more appreciative of his work than I am now. But it
           | would be exactly the same work, the same letters on the page.
           | Why should the context change make any difference at all?
           | 
           | So maybe that just makes me petty. But even if so, I can't
           | argue myself into enjoying something I don't enjoy.
        
         | jasonladuke0311 wrote:
         | You should avoid House of Leaves at all costs.
        
       | x-sp wrote:
       | https://archive.ph/7lhHN
        
       | jansan wrote:
       | Why is it coming up now? Does he finally have a chance to win the
       | Nobel Prize in Literature?
        
         | voisin wrote:
         | He has two books coming out, one this month and one next. First
         | books since 2006 I believe.
        
         | random42_ wrote:
         | Probably because he's got two new books coming out this year:
         | https://www.nytimes.com/2022/03/08/books/cormac-mccarthy-new...
        
         | oxfeed65261 wrote:
         | FTA:
         | 
         | 'The find [of the early interviews] comes as McCarthy is
         | preparing to publish two new intertwined novels, "The
         | Passenger" and "Stella Maris" -- his first since 2006, when he
         | released "The Road," a best seller that won the Pulitzer Prize.
         | 
         | 'McCarthy will give no interviews in conjunction with their
         | release. Instead, here is a look back at a less guarded time in
         | his life.'
        
       | mellosouls wrote:
       | _Blood Meridian_ is worth a Nobel on it 's own, I've often
       | wondered why he's never received it, he's distinctive and
       | mesmerising at his best.
        
         | wellthisisgreat wrote:
         | Same, maybe BM is just too... pulp genre-wise somehow? Or too
         | cruel while being fictional and Nobel tolerates cruelty when
         | it's based on true events?
        
           | mellosouls wrote:
           | I think it has some basis in real events and characters, eg
           | The Judge was real (though obviously somewhat reimagined
           | here).
        
             | random42_ wrote:
             | The Glanton Gang was also real:
             | https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Joel_Glanton
        
       | sn41 wrote:
       | I first heard of Cormac McCarthy when Harold Bloom raved about
       | his "Blood Meridian". I am sorry to say this, I was not moved by
       | Cormac McCarthy. I read "All the Pale Horses", and "No Country
       | for Old Men". I started reading "Blood Meridian", but there was a
       | gruesome scene involving infants. I never saw the point of Judge
       | Holden, even though in my mind, I kept visualizing him being
       | played by Daniel Day-Lewis. My plan is to read "Cities of the
       | Plain" and "Outer Dark" - they are poetic titles, but I wonder
       | whether I should spend the time.
        
         | ne8il wrote:
         | I think you will find those two novels similar to his other
         | work. Also, there is a book in the Border Trilogy between "All
         | the Pretty Horses" and "Cities of the Plain" - "The Crossing".
         | 
         | "Suttree" doesn't come up as often as his other work but is my
         | personal favorite. There are some darker moments but it's a
         | very funny book - a lot of "Charles Portis"-esque conversations
         | and encounters.
        
         | johnvaluk wrote:
         | Blood Meridian left me with the feeling that Judge Holden was
         | originally multiple characters turned into a composite to serve
         | as a narrative device and metaphor. I think I would have
         | enjoyed the book more if it had been a straightforward odyssey
         | of the kid, involving the many people and situations he
         | encountered along the way. Using the Judge as a thematic binder
         | sort of ruined it for me.
        
           | CPLX wrote:
           | There's a lot of interpretations and I don't know if he's
           | ever endorsed one, but I see the judge as a general
           | representation of a concept I'd describe loosely as
           | capitalism, or the Industrial Revolution, or western
           | technological progress in general.
           | 
           | He's the embodiment of a force that just overtops and
           | envelops everything in its path. It's doesn't even make sense
           | to consider him moral or immoral or amoral (as many do when
           | considering him a stand in for the devil) but more as a force
           | that just transcends morality completely and makes it
           | irrelevant, a force that has no other purpose but to expand
           | and consume resources, indifferent to death or convention or
           | tradition. A force that never sleeps.
           | 
           | I think the scene where he calmly ignores the Indian attack
           | while making explosives is probably the most literal example
           | but the theme runs through his character.
        
       | narrator wrote:
       | Everyone loves "The Road", but more than half the book is the kid
       | saying he's scared, hungry, or cold and dad saying it's going to
       | be ok. The repetition gets ridiculous.
        
         | pavlov wrote:
         | Life with children is often repetitive and you find yourself
         | reverting to the same old platitudes and patterns. So at least
         | it's realistic?
        
         | Eumenes wrote:
         | Agreed, fortunately its a short book. Has me on the fence about
         | reading Blood Meridian.
        
           | beowulfey wrote:
           | Definitely give it a try. Blood Meridian is like no other
           | book. Definitely not repetitive!
        
         | erokar wrote:
         | I agree. While it certainly contains good writing that book is
         | also mannered and sentimental, my least favourite of his.
        
       | kekkidy wrote:
        
       | [deleted]
        
       | karaterobot wrote:
       | I got a few paragraphs into the article and realized that I feel
       | weird about reading an article that oriented around sharing
       | inconsequential private details he probably regrets divulging
       | decades ago. I don't need to know about his private life to
       | appreciate his books. I think it's fine for scholars to dig this
       | stuff up and record it, but I don't need to read about it.
        
         | marttt wrote:
         | +1, I was thinking the same thing, even though I am definitely
         | and eagerly going to read the research paper on McCarthy's
         | rediscovered interviews. There was a beauty in his reluctance
         | to give interviews; I admit having spent _a lot_ of time years
         | ago to track down stuff that would shed some light on his
         | personality and the rationale behind his punctuation style.
         | And, I felt kind of happy to realize that I have to make most
         | of the conclusions myself.
         | 
         | I liked the image of Cormac McCarthy the recluse, but oh well.
         | 
         | In the age of digital archives, there's no "right to be
         | forgotten" for geniuses, I guess.
        
       | lqet wrote:
       | One of my favorite authors. If you haven't read anything of him,
       | start with "The Road" and "Child of God", they are quite
       | accessible and highly thrilling (I also strongly suspect that
       | Patrick Suskind read "Child of God" before he wrote "Perfume:
       | Story of a Murderer").
       | 
       | "No Country For Old Men" is also a great book. A bit more
       | challenging, but a beautiful read: "All the Pretty Horses".
       | "Blood Meridian" is simply in another league and one of the best
       | novels of the past century. It also contains one of the greatest
       | characters _ever_ , Judge Holden [0]                 He wafts his
       | hat and the lunar dome of his skull passes palely under the lamps
       | and he swings about and takes possession of one of the fiddles
       | and he pirouettes and makes a pass, two passes, dancing and
       | fiddling at once. His feet are light and nimble. He never sleeps.
       | He says that he will never die. He dances in light and in shadow
       | and he is a great favorite. He never sleeps, the judge. He is
       | dancing, dancing. He says that he will never die.
       | 
       | [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judge_Holden
        
         | mjrbrennan wrote:
         | Love Cormac as well he is also one of my favourite authors.
         | That Judge passage is also one of my favourite passages in
         | literature, alongside the ending of The Road which I have
         | framed with a technical drawing of a brook trout:
         | Once there were brook trout in the streams in the mountains.
         | You could see them standing in the amber current where the
         | white edges of their fins wimpled softly in the flow. They
         | smelled of moss in your hand. Polished and muscular and
         | torsional. On their backs were vermiculate patterns that were
         | maps of the world in its becoming. Maps and mazes. Of a thing
         | which could not be put back. Not be made right again. In the
         | deep glens where they lived all things were older than man and
         | they hummed of mystery.
         | 
         | Just finished Cities of the Plain after reading the rest of the
         | border trilogy and not being that impressed, but this one
         | absolutely floored me and I shed tears at the end. Will need to
         | go back and read all three in quick succession at some point.
         | 
         | Still really need to read Child of God.
        
           | williamcotton wrote:
           | His prose is just immaculate. Do yourself a favor and read
           | the above passage out loud. It has a driving rhythm. What's
           | amazing is that he maintains the beat for entire novels.
        
           | bmj wrote:
           | Have you spent any time in the southwest United States? Those
           | books hit me a particular way after many trips to west Texas,
           | New Mexico, and Arizona. McCarthy has a way of capturing that
           | landscape....
        
             | mjrbrennan wrote:
             | No I've never been to the states, I've always wanted to
             | though. I want to visit so many states since America has
             | such a huge cultural influence on me especially my fiction,
             | but I live in Australia so it's kind of impractical. Can't
             | wait to get there some day!
        
         | wellthisisgreat wrote:
         | Blood Meridian is like a poem, that is movie but in a form of a
         | sculpture and in prose.
        
         | mtalantikite wrote:
         | Maybe it's just because it was the order I read his work in,
         | but I'd start with "Blood Meridian". It's just beyond so many
         | other books out there. Same with the Border Trilogy.
         | 
         | I'm coincidentally reading "The Road" right now for the first
         | time -- somehow I never made it to it over the years -- and
         | honestly I'm not sure I'd have gone into the rest of his work
         | so deeply if I had started with it. Same with "Suttree".
         | They're good, but "Blood Meridian" and the Border Trilogy I
         | barely took breaks from while reading. Just plowed through them
         | front to back. When I got to the end of "Blood Meridian" I just
         | started at the front again. No need for a warm up, just jump
         | right in to some of the best literature you'll ever encounter.
        
           | Keblo wrote:
           | Child of God is an easier read than Blood Meridian, and acts
           | as a pretty good way to get used to his minimalist
           | punctuation
        
             | mtalantikite wrote:
             | Sure, though my point is that I read Blood Meridian first
             | and didn't find it all that hard to get into. It's just so
             | good you'll give it your full attention and effort. Had I
             | started with Suttree or The Road I may have just given up
             | and not gotten to Blood Meridian at all. I put both of
             | those books down for significant periods of time. I'm
             | trying to finish The Road right now.
             | 
             | I actually found "All the Pretty Horses" to be the harder
             | read, since he'll just write full dialogues in Spanish, and
             | it's not just a couple of times, it happens often (my
             | Spanish is just ok, enough to survive traveling in latin
             | america).
        
         | ta20211004_1 wrote:
         | Ok that passage from Blood Meridian is obviously great, but
         | posting it out of context like this makes my skin crawl! It's
         | almost a spoiler. Without knowing the preceding events, and the
         | general way in which the story is grounded in reality, the
         | otherworldliness of this passage is totally out of context!
         | 
         | That's my 2c.
        
         | ak39 wrote:
         | Thanks for this. I have yet to read Blood Meridian. I have read
         | The Road and NCFOM. Both were great and absorbing reads. But I
         | have one major gripe with CM (if I am allowed to do so). It's
         | not his style - in fact it's his unique and great style of
         | writing that would make anyone forget about what I'm going to
         | say.
         | 
         | My problem with CM: his themes of post-apocalyptic, desperate
         | humanity at war with itself and the singular savagery of ONE
         | man against all - takes the assumed position that humans by
         | nature (generally, of course) will almost always reduce to
         | selfish savagery even to the point of normalising cannibalism.
         | Of course, he needed to create this assumed backdrop for many
         | of his stories (eg The Road needed this literally visceral
         | danger for a father to demonstrate his instinctive protection
         | for his only son) but CM's imagined scenario of a society
         | that's eating itself is far from real evidence we have seen of
         | humans. Real evidence shows that during catastrophic moments
         | like earthquakes and prolonged famine and even war, human
         | societies have shown remarkable strength to save and to protect
         | and to help one another, sometimes at great individual
         | sacrifice.
         | 
         | I know you can't criticise a work of fiction this way, an
         | author is entitled his artistic philosophy and outlook. But
         | when the writing is so masterful, when the rest of the
         | philosophies of the stories are so elevated and cerebrally
         | engaging, one can't help but find the story of humans
         | cultivating others for food jarring and out of place.
         | 
         | (This is my first "criticism" of any work of literature.)
        
           | SideburnsOfDoom wrote:
           | > post-apocalyptic, desperate humanity at war with itself and
           | the singular savagery
           | 
           | If you were to show me that phrase and ask which book matches
           | it most closely, I would have to say "Blood Meridian". It's a
           | singular work. Texas-Mexico border area, 1850s. It's
           | definitely post-apocalyptic, the aftermath of an invasion of
           | technologically sophisticated but genocidally savage aliens
           | ... for the native Americans.
        
             | defen wrote:
             | It's also worth noting that for Blood Meridian, McCarthy
             | learned Spanish and did five years of historical research
             | with his MacArthur award money. The broad strokes of the
             | story are true - there really was a group of scalp hunters
             | who went rogue, raping and murdering the people they had
             | been hired to protect.
        
             | AlotOfReading wrote:
             | Any historical "invasion of technologically sophisticated
             | aliens" in the time period blood meridian is set in
             | happened centuries before. It's actually near a zenith of
             | native political and military power. Spain is gone, Mexico
             | is struggling to build a government, and the US hasn't yet
             | become a dominant power in the region.
             | 
             | Blood meridian is a book I often recommend as an
             | approachable introduction to what people experiencing the
             | period might have thought, but framing the context is
             | somewhat important.
        
           | jnsie wrote:
           | > Real evidence shows that during catastrophic moments like
           | earthquakes and prolonged famine and even war, human
           | societies have shown remarkable strength to save and to
           | protect and to help one another, sometimes at great
           | individual sacrifice.
           | 
           | I find it hard to agree with this after COVID showed that a
           | substantial portion of the US and global population weren't
           | willing to wear masks to protect their fellow man and life
           | saving vaccines were purposefully politicized. I also think
           | that post apocalyptic novels typically live in a world where
           | traditional power structures have been abandoned/destroyed
           | and individualism is necessary for survival so I'm not sure
           | one can draw a parallel between typical catastrophes and
           | apocalyptic events.
        
           | brudgers wrote:
           | At the end of The Road, there are The Good Guys.
           | 
           | It is an allegory of fathers and sons.
        
           | kamranjon wrote:
           | I highly recommend Suttree, which is much less in that post-
           | apocalyptic vein. It's incredibly humanistic and funny and I
           | think it's his best work. It still has his incredible command
           | of the English language and sequences of just absolutely
           | beautiful prose, and in some ways it can be quite devastating
           | but it's much more balanced with the endearing parts of
           | humanity I think.
        
             | whiddershins wrote:
             | I second Suttree. I love the preface so much I memorized
             | most of it.
        
               | everybodyknows wrote:
               | _Suttree_ is an early work, and said to be heavily
               | autobiographical. I read it as a key to understanding
               | McCarthy 's view of the world, being essentially tragic.
               | 
               | I'd suggest there's a similar identification between the
               | author and the Kid of _Blood Meridian_.
               | 
               | What McCarthy thinks of Melville's _Moby Dick_ I have not
               | heard, but for the reader anyway, there 's a rich cross-
               | fertilization. Both of ideas -- being a pawn within a
               | monstrous, doomed enterprise -- and of technique, as with
               | the cryptic oracles of catastrophe who say their piece
               | and then vanish from the narrative.
        
           | somenameforme wrote:
           | With good authors, I would always keep metaphor in mind. In
           | the case of The Road, I think what you're hitting on arguably
           | the single most critical question the book asks: do we
           | cooperate because we're benevolent, or do we cooperate
           | because we're selfish and cooperation furthers our own
           | interests?
           | 
           | When working together is clearly beneficial, not cooperating
           | is simply illogical. But what happens when cooperation is not
           | only not clearly beneficial, but may even be actively
           | detrimental? What happens if you're starving to death, and
           | you see a weaker man who has enough, barely enough, to feed
           | himself approaching? And that is all there is?
           | 
           | Adding a notion of a child, of the future itself, into the
           | picture makes it all the more difficult.
        
           | jjulius wrote:
           | >... CM's imagined scenario of a society that's eating itself
           | is far from real evidence we have seen of humans. Real
           | evidence shows that during catastrophic moments like
           | earthquakes and prolonged famine and even war, human
           | societies have shown remarkable strength to save and to
           | protect and to help one another, sometimes at great
           | individual sacrifice.
           | 
           | This is very tangential, but this is one of the reasons I
           | could never get into The Walking Dead and similar shows. It
           | was _really_ hard for me to suspend my disbelief there.
        
           | tmountain wrote:
           | Some of this is in the service of making commentary on
           | broader topics. I view Blood Meridian as a treatise on the
           | horrific nature of war. McCarthy accomplishes this via an
           | endlessly gruesome tale, but the underlying message couldn't
           | be more clear.
        
           | afpx wrote:
           | For real evidence of Humanity's cruelty: Read Pinker's
           | "Better Angels". Luckily, we're trending upward.
        
           | krelian wrote:
           | The Road is his only post-apocalyptic novel, it's not really
           | a theme of his.
           | 
           | The potential for savagery, how easy it is for some to take a
           | human life or completely disregard it _is_ a theme that runs
           | in many of his novels. In a post-apocalyptic scenario like in
           | The Road, where _everyone_ is literally scavenging for their
           | lives you can bet your ass life will become a horror show.
           | Not for everyone, not anywhere, but for enough people to
           | determine that it is part of human nature just a much as
           | extending help to one another.
           | 
           | To me CM's work explores the duality of beauty (in the most
           | expansive sense of the word) and tragedy that exists in the
           | world.
           | 
           | I recommend All the Pretty Horses if you want something less
           | intense than The Road or Blood Meridian but no less powerful.
           | One my favorite quotes:
           | 
           |  _"He thought that in the beauty of the world were hid a
           | secret. He thought that the world's heart beat at some
           | terrible cost and that the world's pain and its beauty moved
           | in a relationship of diverging equity and that in this
           | headlong deficit the blood of multitudes might ultimately be
           | exacted for the vision of a single flower."_
        
           | tablespoon wrote:
           | > ...but CM's imagined scenario of a society that's eating
           | itself is far from real evidence we have seen of humans. Real
           | evidence shows that during catastrophic moments like
           | earthquakes and prolonged famine and even war, human
           | societies have shown remarkable strength to save and to
           | protect and to help one another, sometimes at great
           | individual sacrifice.
           | 
           | I've literally only read the Cliff's Notes version of The
           | Road, but the scenario it describes seems far bleaker,
           | prolonged, and hopeless than any historical event you might
           | look for as precedent. It seems quite plausible that what the
           | book describes is _after_ some people tried to pull together
           | in some feel-good way, and then failed and fell apart again
           | because it wasn 't going to work.
        
       | marttt wrote:
       | Thanks for sharing this. Link to the paper mentioned in the NYT
       | story, "Cormac McCarthy's Interviews in Tennessee and Kentucky,
       | 1968-1980" (The Cormac McCarthy Journal (2022) 20 (2): 108-135;
       | free access):
       | https://scholarlypublishingcollective.org/psup/cormac-mccart...
       | 
       | To me, Cormac McCarthy has an incredibly good sense of how people
       | actually speak. As a side note, same thing was also said
       | somewhere about Quentin Tarantino -- as one of the most relevant
       | reasons why his movies are "cult".
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2022-10-05 23:02 UTC)