[HN Gopher] Bargain hunter scores 700-year-old document
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Bargain hunter scores 700-year-old document
        
       Author : Vigier
       Score  : 60 points
       Date   : 2022-09-28 04:50 UTC (1 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (apnews.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (apnews.com)
        
       | kleiba wrote:
       | Wow, both 700 years old and medieval! How lucky!
        
         | sophacles wrote:
         | There are parts of the world that aren't European... many of
         | them existed 700 years ago too, and were populated by people
         | who had unlocked writing.
        
         | insane_dreamer wrote:
         | rare combo indeed
        
         | dang wrote:
         | Ok, we've gotten unmedieval on its ass.
        
           | kleiba wrote:
           | Dang, now my comment's no longer funny... but then again:
           | maybe it never was :-)
        
       | actually_a_dog wrote:
       | Incidentally, this appears to be a portion of a premodern musical
       | score. You wouldn't be able to just sit down and play it as if it
       | were a modern score, because the scales started at a different
       | place way back when, but it could certainly be transcribed to
       | modern notation and would be playable/singable then.
        
         | Bud wrote:
         | Nope! Lots of pro singers (including me) can read this as-is.
         | No need to transcribe to modern notation. This chant notation
         | is still very commonly used and read today by all kinds of
         | professionals.
        
           | actually_a_dog wrote:
           | Well, then, I (happily!) stand corrected. Still, this
           | notation would not be immediately playable to an
           | instrumentalist who had never specifically studied medieval
           | music, and that is probably most of them.
        
       | throw7 wrote:
       | "The full missal was once owned by William Randolph Hearst, the
       | newspaper publisher, before being sold in the 1940s and, much to
       | the consternation of today's academics, was divvied up into
       | individual pages, she said."
       | 
       | Everything's for sale. :(
        
         | adolph wrote:
         | Why the sad face? Without the mechanism of sale the artifact
         | would not be accessible to the person who appreciates it.
        
           | Bud wrote:
           | Fuck "mechanism of sale". You can't see the value of
           | preserving the full, priceless manuscript in its original
           | form?
        
             | [deleted]
        
           | adrianmonk wrote:
           | It's not a comment about the fact that the _document itself_
           | can be bought and sold. It means that the _physical
           | integrity_ of the document is metaphorically  "for sale". If
           | damaging the document (by cutting it up) leads to more
           | profit, then there are people who will choose profit over
           | preservation.
        
             | dmix wrote:
             | That would probably reduce the total value, so there are
             | some disincentives.
        
               | bryanrasmussen wrote:
               | If it diminished the total value, then why did it happen?
               | Other comments here seems to suggest it happens because
               | it increases the total value.
        
               | freetime2 wrote:
               | Could be a difference in long-term vs short-term outlook.
               | In the short term, cutting it up and selling it in pieces
               | increases the number of potential buyers, which probably
               | helps to fetch a higher price. But in the long term, you
               | may be able to fetch a higher price by keeping it intact
               | - especially if fully intact works become increasingly
               | rare due to people cutting them up in pursuit of short
               | term gains.
        
               | dmix wrote:
               | Yes, exactly. It's only done to find a buyer quickly.
        
         | Archelaos wrote:
         | This horrible fate is unfortunately what awaits many old
         | manuscripts sold in auctions to a specific sort of professional
         | dealers. The dealers cut the manuscripts not only into
         | individual sheets, but often cut out miniatures and illuminated
         | initials and sell them individually to philistins. Loosing
         | their original context this scraps are next to worthless for
         | any future historians. It is in the same category as grave
         | robbery, which also tremendously diminishes the scientific
         | value of artifacts, even if they come to light later.
        
           | WalterBright wrote:
           | The least they could do is scan the originals, and donate
           | them to archive.org.
        
         | hnbad wrote:
         | Just think of how much value was added by divvying it up into
         | individual pages if a single page is worth $10,000. /s
        
           | actually_a_dog wrote:
           | You may joke, but this is actually a very, very common issue
           | collectors of historical documents face. Collectors of
           | physical bond certificates also face this issue in the form
           | of complete bonds being cut apart and the coupons being sold
           | separately from the certificate itself. It's quite maddening,
           | actually.
        
             | hnbad wrote:
             | The sarcasm was that destroying a historical artefact "adds
             | value", not that it is a common practice. Europeans
             | literally used to cut up mummies and sell the fragments.
             | But the only way it "adds value" is purely from the
             | perspective of maximizing revenue, the same way scalpers
             | "add value" by buying up products for cheap at the original
             | price and then making a profit by charging more.
        
               | gjm11 wrote:
               | I share your sense that there's something horrible about
               | this. But I don't think it's necessarily true that the
               | _only_ way it adds value is  "from the perspective of
               | maximizing revenue".
               | 
               | Suppose you've got a book with 200 pages and you can sell
               | each page for $10k or the whole book for $1M. You get
               | twice as much by selling individual pages and you are
               | (hypothetically) a soulless money-grubbing philistine, so
               | you slice it up and sell all the pages.
               | 
               | Has anything been gained, other than extra money for you?
               | Yes! 200 people now have a beautiful historic artefact
               | that they value having enough to want to pay $10k for it.
               | In the scenario where you don't play Lizzie Borden on the
               | book, _one_ person has the whole thing. But evidently the
               | satisfaction they get from having it isn 't 200x the
               | satisfaction those 200 people each get, because if it
               | were they'd have been willing to pay you $2M instead of
               | $1M.
               | 
               | Of course the paragraph above is the naive optimistic
               | version. The cynical pessimistic version says that no one
               | in the story actually cares about history or calligraphy
               | or art or what have you, they just hope that in a few
               | years someone else will be willing to pay more for the
               | artefact they've got.
               | 
               | (Maybe the very fact that the individual pages are worth
               | more than the book composed of them is an argument
               | against the cynical pessimistic version: if all that's
               | going on here is a lot of soulless money-grubbing
               | philistines trying to maximize their profits, then the
               | price of the book _should_ be at least the price of all
               | its pages, because someone who owns the book always has
               | the option of slicing it up, so apparently something else
               | is going on here. But I fear a sufficient explanation is
               | that everyone is a soulless money-grubbing philistine
               | _and_ the market isn 't functioning efficiently.)
               | 
               | [EDITED to add: Another bit of evidence that the relevant
               | market, in this particular case and in the present day,
               | isn't entirely composed of soulless money-grabbing
               | philistine speculators: the story tells us that the
               | person who bought it is not interested in selling it for
               | $10k, because he loves having it, because it's beautiful
               | and historic. Of course this doesn't tell us anything
               | about whether _when the book was sliced up for profit_
               | the market was entirely composed of s.m-g.p.s; maybe it
               | was.]
        
               | Eleison23 wrote:
               | Interestingly, Egyptian mummies resulted from a process
               | whereby the enbalmers would take apart the human body
               | from the inside out and preserve the organs separately,
               | so in a way, the Europeans were merely continuing the
               | process of "parting them out".
               | 
               | As far as adding value, why not turn valuable works into
               | NFTs by destroying them?
               | https://culturacolectiva.com/art/frida-kahlo-artwork-
               | burned-...
        
               | [deleted]
        
       | bitxbitxbitcoin wrote:
       | For those curious: it was from an estate sale in Maine, and the
       | estimated value is $10k.
        
         | neogodless wrote:
         | I'm guessing the above is a "too long, didn't read"?
         | 
         | In the article
         | 
         | > A bargain hunter who went to an estate sale in Maine
         | 
         | > An expert on manuscripts said the document, first reported by
         | the Maine Monitor, could be worth as much as $10,000.
        
       | ourmandave wrote:
       | _The page purchased by Sideri is of particular interest to
       | scholars.
       | 
       | It's a treasure both because of its age and condition, which is
       | far better than the other page in the Colby collection, said
       | Megan Cook, Sideri's former professor, who teaches medieval
       | literature at Colby.
       | 
       | The parchment is worth upward of $10,000, according to Davis. But
       | Sideri said he has no intention of selling it. ... "This is
       | something at the end of the day that I know is cool," he said. "I
       | didn't buy this expecting to sell it."_
       | 
       | Ah, he's already positioning with "No lowballers, I know what
       | I've got."
        
         | ProAm wrote:
         | Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar
        
       | daniel-cussen wrote:
       | Oh that happened to me recently. So I actually talk to both
       | beggars and cops, which nobody does, everybody takes advice from
       | civil rights lawyers and the gangsters they give impunity, which
       | agree that you should never talk to police. Same advice.
       | Coincidence. Both treat both homeless and cops like shit.
       | Coincidence.
       | 
       | Anyway so I'm talking to him, and he shows me some big _huge_
       | format documents, like 30 inches by 40 inches, inches not
       | centimeters, and I look, holy shit, somebody forgot to use the
       | incinerator, military intelligence on the street. Literally on
       | the street, laying there on the concrete, getting dirty, maps
       | made in England with analog mapmaking, Crown Copyright from the
       | 70 's and 80's, of the coastline of Argentina, complete with
       | information of reefs which eg an aircraft carrier could collide
       | with. It was obvious that was the intention. Dude obviously
       | threatened to nuke Buenos Aires.
       | 
       | Notably Banco Ingles, with a tilde and everything, we're talking
       | high production values, the absolute highest, English Admiralty,
       | Superpower internal information. As an native English speaker, I
       | would translate that bank's name to English as Fuck You Sandbank,
       | which protected Buenos Aires once precisely from the same Royal
       | Navy. The depth is 0.7 meters, according to the map I had, and
       | they map uses analog measurements from English satellites, analog
       | photography. So point being somebody forgot to burn them, there's
       | leaks, they're sloppy, they got to a spy, the spy moved to
       | Santiago, the spy gave up on his conspiracy theories and gave
       | them to a beggar, beggar had no idea what they were worth, I
       | bought them for $20, a complete collection, like it says this
       | part to the South is in map 3134, sure enough I also had map
       | 3134, it's everything. Especially the Falklands. Even shows the
       | kelp forests.
       | 
       | Military intelligence. No pixels no matter how close you zoom in.
       | All hand made.
        
         | notch656a wrote:
         | Sounds like you have a standard nautical chart (although when I
         | check 3134 is Islas Canarias to Nouakchott). Now you need the
         | yacht :)
        
           | daniel-cussen wrote:
           | Nah any chart has the depth for a yatch. This had depths for
           | nuclear deterrence.
        
         | DiggyJohnson wrote:
         | This comment made my day. You are not alone in talking to
         | beggars and cops, they're the most interesting strangers to
         | speak with. I hope you don't catch flak for putting it so
         | dramatically, I really enjoyed it, and especially the story
         | that followed.
         | 
         | Super cool item to own. Like you're living in an RPG.
        
           | daniel-cussen wrote:
           | That's exactly what it's like, like I'm living in an RPG.
           | Attack damage carry. I do get a _lot_ of flak. Unscathed. The
           | word is _videoludic_ , video like video, ludic like ludum
           | meaning game in Latin, my life is videoludic.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2022-09-29 23:01 UTC)