[HN Gopher] Alpine Crystal Hunters
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Alpine Crystal Hunters
        
       Author : diodorus
       Score  : 21 points
       Date   : 2022-09-27 04:38 UTC (2 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.archaeology.org)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.archaeology.org)
        
       | misja111 wrote:
       | I'm surprised that around 5900 B.C. it was apparently more warm
       | than now. At least this is what is suggested by the fact that at
       | that time the glacier didn't cover that crystal vein.
        
         | Ancapistani wrote:
         | The articles says the vein was uncovered recently by a
         | _retreating_ glacier, but that it was uncovered previously by
         | an _advancing_ glacier.
        
           | misja111 wrote:
           | How could it be uncovered by an advancing glacier?
        
             | Ancapistani wrote:
             | I read it as the vein having been exposed by the movement
             | of the glacier advancing, taking everything that was
             | previously above the vein with it and exposing it to the
             | surface.
             | 
             | I didn't think the glacier was necessarily present in 5900
             | BC.
             | 
             | Now that I've gone back and re-read the article, it looks
             | like I was mistaken:
             | 
             | > [H]e came upon a rich vein of rock crystal exposed by a
             | retreating glacier.
             | 
             | > The team determined that hunter-gatherers living during
             | the Alpine Mesolithic period (ca. 9000-5500 B.C.) visited
             | the site as recently as 5900 B.C. and extracted rock
             | crystal from the vein, after which it was covered by the
             | advancing glacier.
             | 
             | The article seems to be saying that the glacier both
             | advanced over the area and retreated from it since 5900 BC.
             | That might mean it was warmer then than it is now, but not
             | necessarily - the "recent" glaciation could have been
             | caused by differences in climate other than temperature,
             | like precipitation.
             | 
             | Hypothetically, it could be that it has been warming since
             | 5900 BC. Prior to that, the glacier could have existed but
             | been relatively static at higher elevation. Warming would
             | have caused some to melt, which changed the forces at play
             | and caused the glacier to migrate down the slope. That
             | would have allowed the vein to be accessible in 5900 BC,
             | covered at some point thereafter by the movement of the
             | glacier, then be accessible again today due to the glacier
             | melting and/or continuing its movement to lower elevations.
             | 
             | There's just not enough information in the article to say
             | for sure, and I'm not familiar enough with the state of our
             | knowledge of historical climate data to make an educated
             | guess.
        
               | misja111 wrote:
               | > .. and extracted rock crystal from the vein, after
               | which it was covered by the advancing glacier.
               | 
               | I think you read wrong. It says it was covered by the
               | advancing glacier, not uncovered. So at 5900 BC the
               | glacier had advanced less than now and certainly a lot
               | less than say 100 years ago. Doesn't this mean that it
               | was warmer at that time, or at the very least, warmer
               | some time not too long before 5900 BC?
        
             | bri3d wrote:
             | Glaciers slide down hill. As they accumulate mass in the
             | accumulation zone, even when it's cold, they are pushed
             | down the hill. So a glacier which is growing in size will
             | still be moving down hill.
             | 
             | https://asf.alaska.edu/information/glacier-power/glacier-
             | pow...
        
               | saiya-jin wrote:
               | Its on average around 0.5m/day, but could be up to
               | 1m/day. Gravity is too strong force, and they are not
               | tightly bonded to bedrock. I would expect that in hard
               | winter they move much less but still some.
               | 
               | That's how they keep discovering dead alpinists (more
               | like parts of them, ie Reinhold Messner's brother Gunther
               | on Nanga Parbat who died there in 1970, I think it was
               | piece of femur bone and shoe) in Alps and Himalaya,
               | everything that falls down on glacier or into crevasse
               | eventually ends up at the snout of glacier (or river
               | flowing from it).
               | 
               | Their overall accelerated melting due to climate change
               | just accelerates all this since glaciers retreat higher
               | and higher.
        
               | misja111 wrote:
               | Yes it flows downhill, but as long as ice is accumulated
               | in the accumulation zone, which is in the upper region of
               | the glacier, the downflowing part is filled up by new ice
               | from above.
               | 
               | By the way the article doesn't say that the veins were
               | uncovered by the advancing glacier, it says the opposite,
               | the advancing glacier covered them.
        
           | [deleted]
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2022-09-29 23:02 UTC)