[HN Gopher] The Disappearing Art of Maintenance
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       The Disappearing Art of Maintenance
        
       Author : TeacherTortoise
       Score  : 134 points
       Date   : 2022-09-27 15:58 UTC (7 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.noemamag.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.noemamag.com)
        
       | nappy-doo wrote:
       | I recently got bit by the pinball bug, and while reading this
       | article all I could think about is that maintenance is part of
       | the hobby. And for some it's all the hobby.
       | 
       | Buying a pinball machine is expensive. Prices on used machines
       | range from free to thousands (and ten thousand+ for really in
       | demand ones). After you buy the machine, assuming it works,
       | there's maintenance that occurs on the machine as a direct
       | function of how often the machine is played. Maintaining that
       | machine can be on you for parts and labor, or someone who comes
       | to your home for 100$/hour (or so) +parts. There's no escaping
       | the labor. You have to do it, or the pinball machine stops
       | working. The maintenance ranges from simple cleaning this and
       | that, all the way to removing components from boards, and
       | rewiring destroyed traces.
       | 
       | I love this about the hobby, and it's probably my favorite part.
       | I like maintaining the machines probably more than I like playing
       | them.
        
         | [deleted]
        
       | maerF0x0 wrote:
       | fwiw I've noticed that my 2016 vehicle is surprisingly low
       | maintenance compared to previous generations of vehicles. From
       | longer cycles for basic maintenance[2] to parts just not failing
       | as soon as I was used to (eg, check out this article[1] about cv
       | joints lasting 2-3x as long).
       | 
       | I wish i could say the same about home appliances.
       | 
       | [1]: https://bobistheoilguy.com/forums/threads/how-long-should-
       | yo...
       | 
       | [2]: eg cars going from 3k to 5k to 8k miles between oil changes,
       | kn&n filters lasting 50k miles on hwy etc.
        
         | mindentropy wrote:
         | How are K&N filters compared to the stock filters? I am
         | thinking of changing my stock filter to K&N filters but I have
         | a lot of hesitation on how long it will last.
        
           | maerF0x0 wrote:
           | I think the two main takes are:
           | 
           | 1. a tiny bit of horsepower/fuel efficiency and no
           | maintenance -- win
           | 
           | 2. It might work by increasing the size of things allowed
           | through, which maybe matters to your engine life? -- loss.
           | 
           | YMMV, literally
        
       | Kaibeezy wrote:
       | The ice maker in my Samsung refrigerator has failed. Too late, I
       | now know this is common for the brand. The part costs PS100
       | ($100). The fridge was kind of expensive, with a deli drawer,
       | French doors, etc.
       | 
       | The refrigerant line for the entire fridge loops naked through
       | the ice mechanism. Apparently, it is all too easy to nick the
       | line, bricking the entire appliance.
       | 
       | Accordingly, no repair person will touch it. I'm moderately
       | competent with mechanical and electronic things, and I would try
       | it, but I'd like a second brain, set of eyes and pair of skilled
       | hands. No one is stepping up, presumably to avoid dealing with
       | the hassle we'd have if we fail, myself included.
       | 
       | I do like ice.
       | 
       | Do I:
       | 
       | a) Give it a shot myself risking a PS2500 refrigerator.
       | 
       | b) Keep trying to find someone who will fix it. Offer them some
       | kind of waiver on replacement cost if they fail.
       | 
       | c) Continue to make ice in trays, a few at a time, whilst the
       | broken ice maker mocks me.
       | 
       | d) Get a countertop ice maker for PS100.
        
         | doodlebugging wrote:
         | We also had one of these side by sides. I replaced the icemaker
         | twice and the icemaker circuit board once over a period of
         | about 12 years. I finally replaced the whole thing last year
         | with a new refrigerator after the freezer light quit working
         | and the easiest, cheapest replacement part did not fix the
         | issue. For what we paid initially and for the other icemakers I
         | would not buy a Samsung again.
         | 
         | If you ever need replacement parts for any home appliances you
         | should go to one of these places [0], [1] where you can get OEM
         | parts instead of aftermarket parts that may not work great.
         | 
         | [0] https://www.appliancepartspros.com/
         | 
         | [1] https://www.ereplacementparts.com/appliance-parts.html
         | 
         | Both sites have exploded diagrams that help you find the part
         | you need and in many cases they have videos to show how to do
         | the repair.
        
         | yason wrote:
         | I approach appliances with the Unix philosophy. One thing to do
         | one thing well -- or at least only one thing to be replaced
         | when one of them breaks. And if I find a genuinely good item I
         | can keep using it even if other machines break.
        
         | Melatonic wrote:
         | Or E) Buy the same exact appliance on Gumtree or whatever
         | Craigslist approximator is currently available for probably
         | something like 400 :-)
         | 
         | You could also guilt trip Samsung on Twitter and they might
         | replace it for free
        
           | atoav wrote:
           | I recently fixed a AV switcher (HD cinema stuff with custom
           | programming by a media tech company) this way. The device
           | costed 9kEUR back in the day.
           | 
           | One day it died and took the whole room with itself. Because
           | it also controlled the lights via DALI no light could be
           | switched on or off in that room.
           | 
           | I figured out that the 24V "Medical Grade" (?) Made in China
           | powersupply was toast. The typical bloated and leaking
           | electrolytic capacitors were no surprise after nearly a
           | decade of 24/7 operation. But there was also an exploded
           | SOIC-14 IC by STM that I could not identify because
           | coincidentally it was just the manufacturer part number that
           | had been vaporized. A search for suspect parts didn't yield
           | any results.
           | 
           | I checked ebay and found a used device for 100 Euros and
           | bought it. The used device _also_ had a broken PSU. But the
           | IC was working (and yeah, nothing you would be able to buy).
           | So I swapped the capacitors and everything worked again.
           | 
           | A replacement for that unit including programming would have
           | costed my company 20k at least.
        
         | kevstev wrote:
         | Heh I have also had trouble with a higher end model's ice
         | maker. I have donated about half a pint of blood over several
         | stabs at fixing it. Even after I ended up moving and renting
         | the place, the new tenant who also considered himself pretty
         | handy gave a bunch of goes at it too to no avail.
         | 
         | It seems like such a simple device, yet they are devilish to
         | diagnose and repair apparently!
        
           | bsder wrote:
           | Ice makers are the #1 failure mode of refrigerators.
           | 
           | Between being broken, taking up freezer space, having weird
           | plumbing, having water that doesn't move often so grows
           | bacteria, needing filters which nobody ever changes, etc. the
           | best maintenance idea is simply to _not have an ice maker_.
           | 
           | I'm sure that some people get more value out of an ice maker
           | than a couple of ice trays in the freezer. I'm just not sure
           | I've ever met them.
        
             | mrguyorama wrote:
             | Meanwhile the dirt cheap kenmore I had my entire life had
             | an ice maker that never had a problem. It seems more common
             | on the more expensive appliances. It just seems like they
             | overcomplicate and don't build in redundancy or
             | repairability to save a couple bucks.
        
               | onemoresoop wrote:
               | > It just seems like they overcomplicate and don't build
               | in redundancy or repairability to save a couple bucks.
               | 
               | No, they want you to buy another one aka
               | premature/planned obsolescence. Best bet is to research
               | heavily and hope to find a manufacturer who doesn't do
               | that.
        
             | silisili wrote:
             | I think ice makers just got too fancy. I mean, now they do
             | water dispensing, cubed ice, crushed ice, even party ice or
             | whatever that stupid trend is called. My best working ice
             | makers, by far, were the kind that just dumped ice into an
             | internal bucket, with a small wire to detect when full, and
             | you'd grab it yourself. Not at all common, anymore at
             | least.
        
             | ethbr0 wrote:
             | The root problem seems to be that ice makers are an
             | afterthought / outsourced on any price freezer.
             | 
             | Consequently, they're designed to minimal reliability,
             | lasting just long enough to outstrip the warranty.
        
           | [deleted]
        
         | ornornor wrote:
         | I know it's too late for you, but I have a personal rule that's
         | served me very well: never touch any Samsung device ever. You
         | can't avoid the chips they make as part of other devices or
         | appliances but that seems ok.
         | 
         | The Samsung branded appliances and devices however are total
         | garbage and Samsung dgaf. It might actually be part of their
         | business model.
         | 
         | I have rarely heard someone say how happy they are with their
         | Samsung anything, especially not their fridges and other
         | appliances. "Built to fail" is something that often comes up,
         | however.
        
           | kingrazor wrote:
           | I like their SSDs, and haven't had any Samsung ram modules
           | fail, but yeah, for anything else, I avoid the brand.
        
           | donclark wrote:
           | I have a neighbor who does external lighting. Highly
           | recommends Samsung lighting because it outlasts everything
           | else he has used previously.
        
           | jonnycoder wrote:
           | I would like to know which fridge company is the most
           | reliable. My samsung fridge and washer/drier bought in 2013
           | are still running good. I heard bad things about LG
           | compressor in fridges, but their cordless vacuum is
           | outstanding. I will probably never trust GE.
        
             | lotsofpulp wrote:
             | I bought at least 5 or 6 LG linear inverter compressor
             | refrigerators since 2019 and they are all going great, with
             | zero noise.
             | 
             | I think they had issues with their initial models, but they
             | may have improved them. I mainly stick to LG appliances
             | from Costco. But I also avoid getting appliances with fancy
             | features like see through doors and crap. I don't even get
             | ice dispensers, just the ice bucket inside the freezer
             | works.
        
           | mrguyorama wrote:
           | My dad has repeatedly installed samsung appliances,
           | especially one of their dishwashers, in all his housing
           | projects (as a general contractor) because they are "very
           | quiet". Meanwhile, ever single one of them, for two decades
           | now, fails and becomes useless within a year because a stupid
           | water level sensor is exposed to the dishwasher environment
           | in such a way that it gets dirty and tells the system
           | computer to not do anything. "It's an easy fix" he says. If
           | you replace the part, it will just fail again.
           | 
           | I think he might be stupid. He does not get a kickback for
           | this.
        
           | donatj wrote:
           | It's so sad to see such a rapid decline. In the early 2000s
           | every Samsung device I bought was well made and unbreakable.
           | 
           | Every Samsung device I have bought since maybe 2010 including
           | my refrigerator and dishwasher have been total junk. I've had
           | our refrigerator repaired so many times in the last 8 years
           | it's just unreasonable.
        
         | tomcam wrote:
         | Proper choice for you is d). I did it about 6 months ago and am
         | thrilled.
        
       | montereynack wrote:
       | I guess I'll take the opportunity to throw in my hat... I'm
       | currently running a very early-stage startup trying to address
       | some of the brain drain and complexity in industrial maintenance.
       | If you'd like to talk/rant about your job and the pain points you
       | have, I'd be all ears! Wouldn't be a sales call, I'm just trying
       | to talk to people at this point. Feel free to DM me if
       | interested.
        
       | photochemsyn wrote:
       | Making maintenance easier requires a fair amount of industry-wide
       | standardization and interoperability, and many corporations view
       | this a threat to their market share and hence, profitability.
       | This has been widely seen in the computer industry over the
       | years, although the long-term conclusions might oppose the short-
       | term view, i.e. while at first the closed-system strategy might
       | succeed, in the long term having an open-system approach will
       | bring in customers who've been burned in one way or another by
       | the closed-system world.
       | 
       | A particular example I'm very familiar with is bicycles - they're
       | fairly easy to maintain and work on relative to automobiles (no
       | fluids, not much electronics until recently etc.). Ideally a
       | bicycle can be maintained easily and replaced piecemeal from a
       | wide variety of suppliers, i.e. everything is swappable and there
       | are no non-standard parts, such as weirdly threaded bottom
       | brackets or non-standard axle widths. Some companies have tried
       | to do things like that - I think Shimano made an integrated brake
       | lever/gear shifter for a while, whereas most bikes allow you to
       | replace each item separately. For example, if your bicycle frame
       | breaks, you should be able to remove all the parts and install
       | them on a roughly similar frame, even from another manufacturer.
       | 
       | As far as deliberately making repair more difficult in the hopes
       | that people would toss their old devices and buy new ones,
       | there's good evidence for that with Apple, such as the
       | introduction of pentalobe screws for no other plausible reason
       | than making repair require specialized tools (IFixit's
       | comprehensive screwdriver kit is nice in that regard).
       | 
       | The solution is once again, governmental regulation and agreement
       | on certain standards, for example requiring a standard USB-C
       | connection for all phones sold in a given market, etc.
        
         | sinoue wrote:
         | Check lists are useful for dealing with maintenance. Good
         | companies have a process in place to minimize downtime.
        
         | Scoundreller wrote:
         | Grease points already have a standard: zerk fittings, but many
         | car parts don't have them anymore, so you end up replacing all
         | of these "sealed" "lifetime" bearings/joints entirely because
         | they dried out and creak away.
         | 
         | Would be cool if a bicycle bottom bracket or hub had those
         | fittings.
         | 
         | I volunteer at a bike co-op and between the generations,
         | there's been a toooooon of "standards".
         | 
         | Frequent mixes of imperial and metric. A French/Italian/British
         | bike may have the opposite threading on parts than you expect.
         | Different widths of spindles and wheel dishing and spoke
         | lengths and oh my!
         | 
         | How many mm wide would you like your tire? And will it even
         | fit? Can you use that 700C accessory on your 27" or are you
         | SOL?
         | 
         | If we didn't have a boneyard of bikes to scavenge from/strip
         | for parts, we'd get nowhere.
         | 
         | Then the corrosion issues when you "upgrade" to an aluminum
         | seat post or stem on a steel frame...
         | 
         | I guess part of this problem is the durability of bicycles.
         | Cars probably have the same problem but their lifespan is a lot
         | more limited.
         | 
         | Lots of (small s) specialized tools out there because the
         | manufacturer never intended for you to actually take the thing
         | apart. Every design of freewheels required a different tool to
         | remove.
         | 
         | Definitely assembled several Frankenstein-bikes in my lifetime
         | where you'll need a rather diverse set of tools from different
         | generations of bikes to eventually repair!
        
           | kqr wrote:
           | Don't get me started on bicycle wheels. My wife and I both
           | had wheels nominally of the standard size (28 inches). Guess
           | what -- standard 622 ("28 inch") tyres did not fit either of
           | our bikes, but her wheels were too small, and mine were too
           | big!
           | 
           | So we have two different bikes both ostensibly of the
           | standard size, but both differing from it in different
           | directions!
           | 
           | (Yes, I have looked it up on Sheldon Brown's bike tyre sizing
           | guide -- there are two different sizes that are almost the
           | standard size but not quite, one too small, and one too
           | large. So this is not just our bikes that were faulty, these
           | weird sizes are out there.)
        
           | Melatonic wrote:
           | Bicycles have actually gotten much easier to work on but I
           | totally know what you are talking about. Bottom Brackets are
           | actually the one thing I now refuse to work on (too many god
           | damn specialized wrenches just to open and close them).
           | Cartridge bearings are so much easier but as you probably
           | know not really repairable (I have a late 1980s touring
           | bicycle that I regreased the bearings and it rides better
           | than new) but also crazy easy to just swap out. Nobody uses
           | 27" anymore and everything being 700C (even many mountain
           | bikes now with the "29er" trend) makes it all definitely
           | better.
        
             | Scoundreller wrote:
             | New bicycles won't have 27" wheels, but they're still out
             | in the field and manufacturers still mass-produce 27"
             | wheels and tires.
             | 
             | But if you want fenders, you'll have to struggle through
             | mounting a 700C set. At least the tubes are backwards-
             | compatible.
        
         | donatj wrote:
         | > The solution is once again, governmental regulation and
         | agreement on certain standards, for example requiring a
         | standard USB-C connection for all phones sold in a given
         | market, etc.
         | 
         | You spend a long time arguing the opposite with your bicycle
         | argument. The government never forced them to standardize and
         | they did.
        
           | donmaq wrote:
           | > You spend a long time arguing the opposite with your
           | bicycle argument. The government never forced them to
           | standardize and they did.
           | 
           | They really didn't though. From different axel widths forcing
           | older ones obsolete (ie my 10yo $450 Chris King hub in
           | perfect condition 135x10QR now has precisely zero frames it
           | will fit), to actual wheel sizes themselves (26" wheel frame
           | are nearly impossible to find, outside of Dirt Jumping), the
           | bike industry is busily doing their own version of 'embrace &
           | extend'.
           | 
           | There's even electronic shifting now, adding a teensy bit of
           | advantage to rich roadies, while removing the ability to fix
           | your own derailleur.
        
         | patchorang wrote:
         | I agree that bikes are a great way to dip your feet into
         | maintenance. But everything is not swappable. There are a
         | handful of "standards" for each part of the bike. It's not
         | insane, but replacing a part often requires researching all the
         | standards and understand what you have and what you could
         | upgrade it to. Getting a new bike often requires getting a
         | couple of new tools.
         | 
         | That said, if you ride bikes regularly but take it to the shop
         | for maintenance, try doing your next service yourself. There
         | are tons of online videos to help you. It will require an
         | upfront investment of some tools, but they will pay for
         | themselves the second time you use them.
        
       | _trampeltier wrote:
       | I work in maintenance in the steel industry. To find good people
       | is hard, today if somebody has more than two brain cells, the do
       | a lot of study and never really start to work with there hands. I
       | see it now, at moment several people get retired at our company.
       | Instead one smart guy who did everything, you need know one guy
       | for paperwork, one guy for his brainwork, one guy for what he did
       | with his hands .. and one guy more to coordinate these three
       | guys.
       | 
       | Also today with computer everywhere .. before you changed a
       | setting with a screwdriver on a poti, now with computer
       | everywhere .. your installed version is to old, download the
       | latest version, try to install, it fails because the company has
       | tight security rules on companys computer, try on a airgaped
       | notebook for technic, it fails now because you can't install or
       | license the software because no internet .. to keep software up
       | to date and running for over 10 or 20 years is just a f**ing
       | pain. And it gets worse ever day.
        
       | hnthrowaway0328 wrote:
       | I think in general the human mind treats Maintenance as less
       | important or not important at all. The ancient people realized
       | this: When I studied Chinese in primary school, there was one
       | ancient text that spoke about a discussion between a king and a
       | famous doctor. The doctor explained that his brother was superior
       | than him in the medical science but no one heard about him
       | because he could always treat small illnesses before then evolved
       | into terminal ones, so people said, "Oh he is a fine doctor, but
       | he only treats minor illnesses".
       | 
       | This text has been resonating with me for many years. Humans
       | simply do NOT appreciate maintenance people TBH. Me as an
       | example: I own a house but whenever I plan maintenance of my
       | house I always tried to push it a bit further because 1) It's
       | expensive, and 2) Manual or company says that I need to do X
       | every Y years, can I push back say 10% and still don't break
       | things? As for my electronics, unfortunately I never maintained
       | them and in my earlier days I never had a computer that lasted
       | for 3+ years -- they always broke down due to this or that
       | reason.
       | 
       | And then both of my knees have degenerative issues; I had kidney
       | stones; I need to maintain physical health but I was and still is
       | too lazy to do that. I simply do not have the maintenance
       | mindset.
       | 
       | This probably can stretch out to the whole society: We simply do
       | not appreciate Maintenance people. They are usually lowly paid
       | and have low moral because what they work is chore. They also do
       | not get to enjoy creating new things. Basically you need someone
       | who has the mindset to appreciate maintenance to be a good
       | maintenance person, and a society of this mindset to support such
       | work and lower the cost. Nowadays we do not. Nowadays we always
       | doubt the necessity of maintenance and sometimes even accuse
       | other people to charge a large bill for maintenance (sadly, this
       | could be true). There is little trust between.
        
         | nebula8804 wrote:
         | As I enter my mid 30s and am now a year into taking care of my
         | late father's house, I have come to realize that maintenance
         | can really take up so much of your free time that it often
         | feels like its never ending. Its as if when one thing is fixed
         | or "refurbished" the next thing breaks or changes its behavior
         | immediately right after. It can be overwhelming to overcome all
         | this entropy.
         | 
         | Seems as if the only way to really reduce a maintenance burden
         | is to simplify your life more and more including the things in
         | your life. But then you are still having to take care of your
         | body and if you have a family others as well. I can understand
         | a society that has FOMO will put maintenance on the backburner.
         | There just isn't enough time to have your cake and eat it too
         | in our modern world it seems.
        
         | lotsofpulp wrote:
         | This is not something new. It is simply a matter of discipline,
         | and choosing long term rewards over short term rewards.
         | 
         | And people have been choosing short term rewards for many
         | generations and probably all of humanity, even when they know
         | otherwise.
         | 
         | Everyone knows to eat and drink less/better and exercise more,
         | but few do it, because it is not fun.
        
           | hnthrowaway0328 wrote:
           | It's a bit more complicated for the other projects I guess.
           | We never know for sure if the budget is correct or too
           | inflated to satisfy certain interest groups. We don't even
           | know if it is necessary to do X at this moment. Of course we
           | can probably blindly trust the engineers who certified on the
           | reports (because civil engineers are true engineers while
           | software engineers are not?).
        
         | hindsightbias wrote:
         | When I started as a CS graduate, I was thrilled to be on a
         | complex project as a lowly maintainer. I dove into that code
         | and learned how stuff worked. People avoided those areas
         | because it was too dirty, scary or hard sounding. That's the
         | story of my career. Pick a popular project and be a fish in big
         | pond or pick something others stayed away from and own it.
         | 
         | Our future is going to be a shitstorm of breakage. Covid should
         | have taught us a lesson but we're going to go on while
         | infrastructure (physical and virtual) starts to break and no
         | Top 10 grad is going to want to touch it. You're not going to
         | have a choice about plumbing or roof leaks - nobody is coming
         | for a week and you are on your own.
         | 
         | On your knees - I look at my classmates now and consider HS
         | sports to be child abuse. My coworkers talk about their kids
         | surgeries. Those 4 or 5 people boarding your plane in
         | wheelchairs now? It's going to be 3X that in a decade. But
         | that'll be fine, because you'll have to wait a couple hours for
         | the rare pilot to show up.
        
           | nebula8804 wrote:
           | >Our future is going to be a shitstorm of breakage. Covid
           | should have taught us a lesson but we're going to go on while
           | infrastructure (physical and virtual) starts to break and no
           | Top 10 grad is going to want to touch it. You're not going to
           | have a choice about plumbing or roof leaks - nobody is coming
           | for a week and you are on your own.
           | 
           | Its already happening. It feels like a slow collapse. I am
           | trying to maintain my 16 year old car because it is low
           | milage and I just don't want to pay the absurd prices for a
           | new car until maybe next year (especially a Mazda which I
           | like but not at that price). My trusty mechanic has had so
           | many labor issues that while he provides me good service even
           | he is slipping. I've been teaching myself car repair so I can
           | do more and more myself because I know it will be done right
           | and with extreme care.
           | 
           | I see the same happening to local hospitals and doctors
           | offices. I've had to bring parents there or go there myself a
           | few times this year and I can clearly see the degradation in
           | service. I can't do anything about this compared to the car
           | other than take really good care of myself and hope for the
           | best.
           | 
           | Same applies to all of retail. The quality of all mass market
           | stuff just seems worse and worse as time goes on. I was
           | observing this while having a bagel and coffee from Dunkin.
           | Everyone is just flat out "over it".
        
           | DiggyJohnson wrote:
           | > I look at my classmates now and consider HS sports to be
           | child abuse.
           | 
           | It's a serious risk, but the risk-reward is still positive
           | when it comes to the value of youth sports. Do you disagree
           | strongly with this?
        
             | lotsofpulp wrote:
             | I disagree with the risk reward of contact sports,
             | especially if your kid is smaller than average. Anything
             | where the brain collides with the skull is an obvious no
             | (American football, soccer headers, etc).
        
           | tomcam wrote:
           | > Those 4 or 5 people boarding your plane in wheelchairs now?
           | It's going to be 3X that in a decade.
           | 
           | Well... have you seen what happens to the 4 or 5 wheelchairs
           | on the other end of the flight? They often remain empty.
           | Looks to me like people are gaming the system to get
           | preferential treatment on plains.
        
       | doodlebugging wrote:
       | The author goes into the whole Reduce, Reuse, Recycle part of
       | things but I think they miss out on a current trend [0] that may
       | be a subset of Reuse.
       | 
       | [0] https://www.repurposedmaterialsinc.com/
       | 
       | This outfit takes in surplus materials, obsolete parts, etc. and
       | sells them either to be reused as originally intended by a new
       | owner or repurposed to accomplish a new task that the designer
       | never considered.
       | 
       | Repurposing things allows us to keep a lot of stuff out of
       | landfills and for many of the things they sell, extend the useful
       | life of things that are obsolete in their original purpose but
       | that aren't close to being worn out.
        
       | RcouF1uZ4gsC wrote:
       | > "Maintenance must be valued on its own terms, and that means
       | tearing down the economic system that rejects it."
       | 
       | This is not how you get people to side with you about the
       | importance of maintenance.
       | 
       | Honestly, if I have to choose between capitalism and valuing
       | maintenance, I am going to go with capitalism every single time.
        
         | ornornor wrote:
         | First, why? You'll have to slave away at your job longer to
         | replace things you could have otherwise repaired at a fraction
         | of the cost, thus becoming a slave to your job to maintain your
         | income just to keep on existing.
         | 
         | And secondly, why? The pollution this kind of thinking
         | generates is mind boggling and as everyone is becoming aware,
         | we're running out of time to avoid disaster.
         | 
         | So, really, why?
        
           | drstewart wrote:
           | This is still an argument for maintenance, not an argument
           | against capitalism. Maintenance and capitalism aren't
           | diametrically opposed.
        
           | pessimizer wrote:
           | It's important to love capitalism, regardless of whether it
           | has a positive effect on anything in particular. It can tell
           | when you love it, and if it feels loved, the more likely it
           | is to favor you.
        
         | rikroots wrote:
         | I don't understand why the article assumes there's an either/or
         | situation here (maybe it's written from a US-centric POV?);
         | there's a lot of good money to be made from maintenance and
         | waste management. For example here in the UK, cars have to pass
         | an annual road-worthiness test, which gives car owners and
         | garage owners a chance to fix things before they break. In
         | homes, it's a requirement to have gas boilers checked annually
         | - again maintenance. Councils and private housing associations
         | regularly come round to check and refurbish exteriors, wiring,
         | plumbing, etc - waiting until the house floods or burns down
         | doesn't make economic sense to them.
         | 
         | I worked on England's waste strategy published back in 2000.
         | The waste hierarchy back then was "Reduce, Reuse, Refurbish,
         | Recycle" - the promotional focus at the time was on recycling
         | (our recycling rates were abysmal), but maintenance ( ==
         | Refurbish) was definitely part of the mix.
        
           | switch007 wrote:
           | I'd love to know what housing associations you know of that
           | do regular proactive maintenance. My family has decades of
           | experience as tenants and I can't agree at all. I feel they
           | do the complete opposite - hope that only fixing when things
           | break be the cheaper option.
           | 
           | Any regular checks they are a complete farce and on many
           | occasions have actually broken things, especially regarding
           | boilers (I wish I were joking)
           | 
           | I do agree good money is being made on maintenance. The
           | service is sold, it just doesn't properly get carried out
           | 
           | The people they send round to fix things are bluntly thick as
           | shit and often damage more than they fix
        
       | s1mon wrote:
       | I've spent 30+ years designing and engineering consumer and
       | medical products, mostly for high volume production. While I
       | detest working on projects I consider "instant landfill", the
       | reality is that so much of our built society whether it be a toy
       | car, a mobile phone, or a house, is designed to appeal to
       | consumers. Consumers who want their phone to be light,
       | waterproof, beautiful and more powerful than the last one they
       | bought, and at the lowest price possible. Prioritizing things
       | like that means that a lot is invested in specialized equipment,
       | fixtures, and training for the labor force which manufactures
       | their new shiny object. Duplicating that equipment and expertise
       | is next to impossible on the scale of maintenance. Maintenance is
       | more of a craft. Think about your local car mechanic vs the
       | factory which produced the car in the first place.
       | 
       | Even in the factories where your new shiny consumer electronics
       | products are produced, when Chinese News Year is over, and a
       | bunch of the staff turns over, getting the production line up and
       | running again with the same quality is challenging. Despite there
       | being documented standard operating procedures, incoming and
       | outgoing quality checks, etc... there's a lot which is tribal
       | knowledge and muscle memory of the operators. Even if things are
       | highly automated (and you'd be shocked how much is done by hand
       | despite all those magical How It's Made videos), those machines
       | need to be adjusted and tuned to keep from producing junk. This
       | is all to say that so many things are on the hairy edge of
       | working well. They're not always so easy to disassemble and
       | reassemble without destroying seals, alignment, calibration etc.
       | 
       | To a degree, some of this can be blamed on products becoming more
       | and more electronic and miniaturized, but the reality is that so
       | many things involve inseparable assemblies (whether it's an
       | heirloom chair glued out of wood, a PCBA, the drywall in your
       | house, or a welded and painted autobody). While there are rework
       | techniques for these, they're never the same as following the
       | normal process in the factory.
        
       | mountainb wrote:
       | The last time I paid a general appliance repairman to fix my
       | dishwasher, he replaced it with a nonstandard part. It semi-
       | functioned for another couple years, but it generally had a hard
       | time self-cleaning its own filter, which lead to lots of strange
       | and persistent problems. Eventually, the dishwasher failed,
       | causing a leak that required a lot of the flooring around it to
       | be replaced.
       | 
       | I should have just purchased a new dishwasher at the time that
       | GE's planned obsolescence part failed, right at the end of its
       | warranty period.
       | 
       | So, what the article misses is that a lot of the suppression of
       | maintenance providers is related to how our intellectual property
       | regime has been crafted. The statutes and case law give
       | corporations enormous power that they did not really have in
       | previous eras to control supply chains and documentation. There
       | are other factors feeding into this, but if you are looking for a
       | solution to this set of issues it lies within IP reform first and
       | foremost, although that would have its own set of tradeoffs and
       | consequences.
        
         | bombcar wrote:
         | Designing for maintenance often means designing for failure;
         | for example, I want to design my kitchen under the assumption
         | the dishwasher will fail and flood the room, such that it
         | drains safely away without causing damage.
        
           | ticviking wrote:
           | Sure, the consequence of our IP regime is that there is a
           | temptation to design to milk those failures as a revenue
           | source.
           | 
           | With a different IP regime one could imagine incentives that
           | allowed a "right to repair" where IP violation done as a part
           | of a owner commissioned repair were widely accepted or a
           | manufacturer forfeit's the IP when they cease stocking the
           | part defined as "admit they don't stock it" or "do not have
           | it in stock for 6 total months of a year"
        
           | mjevans wrote:
           | Then your kitchen (and laundry room, etc) would have to be
           | properly designed and built, with drains, and a floor sloped
           | to them, waterproof and mold proof materials.
           | 
           | Maybe even a sub-panel so the major appliances and each wall
           | outlet were each on their own circuit and you could plug in a
           | waffle maker and toaster oven on the same wall without
           | popping a circuit breaker.
        
       | Melatonic wrote:
       | I tell people I still do some of my shit "on prem" these days and
       | get weird looks but its a skill I can't help but think is going
       | to become very useful someday soon
        
         | deathanatos wrote:
         | It's funny because I've been "in cloud" all my career and that
         | experience has taught me the value of "on prem".
        
       | Eleison23 wrote:
       | I attended community college a few years ago and took a pair of
       | courses designed as preparation for CompTIA A+ certification. Our
       | final project for the class was to refurbish a desktop computer
       | and donate it.
       | 
       | Our instructor fired up a compressed air machine and we blew out
       | all the dust. We checked connections and RAM, peripherals,
       | optical drive, HDD, etc. We made sure the things booted and
       | probed OK. We checked cosmetics on the front bezel and around the
       | case. No wiping HDD or installing of OS was necessary here, it
       | was strictly a hardware/BIOS-level project.
       | 
       | Then we were graded and the refurbished machines were all shipped
       | off to a local student-run project that provides usable computers
       | to worthy organizations who need them. Definitely a feel-good
       | project, all around!
        
       | Syonyk wrote:
       | I work in the tech industry. I'm somewhat rare in that I also
       | work on my own vehicles, do my own maintenance, repair things,
       | build my own stuff around the property, etc. A lot of coworkers
       | at various places I've worked over the years view this as
       | somewhere between "eccentric" and "slightly mad." "Why would you
       | do that yourself, just _pay someone else_ to do it! " is the
       | common sentiment.
       | 
       | But even with electronics, in an office full of tech workers, I
       | still seemed to be one of very few who was willing to get my
       | hands dirty. I had a steady side stream of evening projects
       | repairing phones, laptops, etc (or, more usually, buying the
       | broken ones, fixing them or merging them together into working
       | ones, and then selling the working ones). I was also, far as I
       | could tell, the only one in an office of >1000 willing to do
       | things like take a soldering iron to a laptop to repair a failed
       | power jack, or even just do things like taking a laptop
       | substantially apart to _replace_ a power input board with a new
       | one.
       | 
       | It never made any sense to me that I was the only one willing to
       | do this sort of stuff. It's paid off well over the years, but
       | it's quite baffling.
       | 
       | This, of course, means that a lot of new things seem to be
       | designed by people who've never had to work on things or repair
       | them, with the expected results of "This is more painful to
       | repair than it has any business being, because you never thought
       | about it." Some of the best vehicles I've worked on over the
       | years were old gen Subarus - EA82, so late 80s wagons. Every time
       | I had to do something on them, it felt like the engineers had
       | considered that someone would have to do this, and made it as
       | easy as possible within the design. Things like the fuel filter
       | were on the firewall, instead of under the vehicle out of the
       | way. The fuel pump was on a skid plate in front of the tank,
       | instead of in the tank. There was a storage compartment in the
       | back that would fit a CV axle, should you want to carry your old
       | one. Etc. They were simple, and easy to work on - so I drove them
       | for quite a few years.
       | 
       | But even today, I still constantly see the sentiment that "Well,
       | it doesn't matter if it's easy to fix, we'll just recycle it and
       | build a new one!" Usually in fields where recycling is poorly
       | defined, at best - consumer electronics and EVs draw this sort of
       | thing frequently. I view that as complete madness, because it's
       | always going to be cheaper to repair something (at least if it
       | wasn't a glued together hell to repair) than to crush it and
       | replace it, but... again, this is an oddly minority view in the
       | tech industry.
       | 
       | I'm not sure how to fix it. We have a lot of people who are
       | afraid to get their hands dirty, designing the things that are
       | supposed to be the future of our civilization. That's a real
       | problem.
       | 
       | > _No amount of utopian dreaming can make a battery hold any more
       | energy or a piece of steel bear any more weight than it's
       | designed for._
       | 
       | Yeah. That describes an awful lot of the problems we're facing...
        
         | jlg23 wrote:
         | > I'm not sure how to fix it. We have a lot of people who are
         | afraid to get their hands dirty, designing the things that are
         | supposed to be the future of our civilization. That's a real
         | problem.
         | 
         | I think "garbage" disposal is way too cheap: books, clothing
         | and electronics are things that should be really expensive to
         | throw away as most often they can be re-used, re-purposed or at
         | least gutted. When disposing them as garbage is more expensive
         | and less convenient than finding someone who wants to take the
         | stuff, people will be motivated to at least donate them.
        
           | Syonyk wrote:
           | Getting rid of trash service would solve a lot, yes... though
           | it would take some adjustments. It's a lot harder if you're
           | denser urban.
           | 
           | I got tired of paying a lot of money to have trash hauled, so
           | I solved it around our property. I built a trash trailer out
           | of some old stuff laying at a relative's place (old pickup
           | bed trailer and a topper, some new plywood for the bottom,
           | some Great Stuff foam to seal it up, and a couple used
           | tires), and I now haul trash every 18 months, aiming for 24
           | months. Food waste goes to the property cats or the compost
           | bins, and I'm able to separate out almost all our waste
           | stream into assorted recycling or reusable packing material
           | (boxes, newspaper, random padding, stuff like that gets
           | reused either by me or by some other people locally with some
           | ecommerce sorts of sales flows). Very little ends up in the
           | trash trailer, and it's not organic, so it just sits there
           | until I haul it.
           | 
           | It's really quite eye opening just how much waste there is in
           | the normal flows of packaging material. I have a
           | local(ish...) way to deal with plastic waste, so I can deal
           | with the "mixed unusual plastics" in a recycling flow as well
           | (it goes to be burned to offset coal use in a cement kiln
           | over in Utah), but that makes up an awful lot of volume in
           | our waste.
           | 
           | With the metal recycling, though, I'm "net positive" on
           | annual trash spend now, and I'm far better able to optimize
           | our waste streams down than I was before. But I also
           | recognize this isn't something that will scale nearly as
           | easily as I can do it.
        
             | mrguyorama wrote:
             | My trash pickup is included in my rent, but to take out the
             | trash involves walking 500 feet accross the property, which
             | turns out is a lot of effort carrying tens of pounds of
             | awkward trash.
             | 
             | So I make less trash now. That cheese danish in the store
             | looks tasty, but the plastic clamshell packaging is
             | incredibly space inefficient as trash, so I'll buy the
             | cookies instead, they're in easy to compact paper boxes.
             | Maybe you think I'm putting a burden on myself but I didn't
             | need either the danish or the cookies in the first place!
        
           | PuppyTailWags wrote:
           | Donating itself is also fraught, however. Very few people are
           | going to want a 20-year-old pulp book, soiled magazine, out-
           | of-date manual, etc. Librarians commonly have to curate their
           | collections which includes throwing out a ton of books, often
           | donated books. Clothing is also often stained, holey, or
           | dirty. While clothing can be repurposed to cleaning rags I
           | suppose, I don't know if one can easily repurpose books.
        
             | mellavora wrote:
             | > While clothing can be repurposed to cleaning rags I
             | suppose,
             | 
             | Not anymore, when almost all clothing is partly synthetic.
             | If it isn't 100% cotton or 100% wool, it is probably going
             | straight to a landfill.
        
               | bombcar wrote:
               | You can find online the absolute bales of clothing crap
               | Goodwill et all throw away; people use them as a dumping
               | ground for garbage so they don't have to feel bad about
               | it.
        
           | InitialLastName wrote:
           | If you get rid of garbage disposal, you get people dumping
           | things in random places. Maybe it's more expensive, maybe
           | some places can enforce not doing it, but if you make
           | instigating negative externalities the easiest solution, what
           | you get is the destruction of the commons.
        
           | mfer wrote:
           | It's not just cheap. The effects of disposing of all the
           | things are out of side and out of mind. People don't see the
           | results of their actions.
        
             | [deleted]
        
         | mfer wrote:
         | I'm like you. I fix my own things including vehicles.
         | 
         | In the past, schools had shop classes and home economics. I
         | took both when I was growing up. Many schools don't have these
         | classes anymore so kids don't get a foundation in being hands
         | on. They don't get comfortable doing their own things. I think
         | this is bad for society.
         | 
         | I know retired folks who work as handy men who have people in
         | their 20's and early 30's as clients. They do simple things
         | like hang pictures on walls (not joking).
         | 
         | Skilled trades working in plumbing, electrical work, carpentry,
         | and so forth are going to be in higher demand in the future.
         | Many are hitting retirement age and the back fill behind them
         | isn't happening. This is happening at the same time
         | construction is going up. Where I live it's almost impossible
         | to find someone to do minor work around your house. Everyone is
         | off doing the big ticket jobs.
         | 
         | Of course, the idea of recycle old things and buy new isn't
         | working out so well. It's often throw out the old (where we
         | fill dumps at increasing rates) and buy new. Setup by companies
         | who make more money that way. For their financial benefit
         | rather than our or our planets benefit.
         | 
         | Fixing things has never been easier. You can learn a ton a
         | youtube these days. There are books, too. Parts are easier than
         | ever to find and order.
        
           | spfzero wrote:
           | >>Parts are easier than ever to find and order.
           | 
           | So true. I was surprised to be able to replace a circuit
           | board on a (probably) 20 year old garage door opener.
           | Surprised, in that I had no knowledge of the things, couldn't
           | really be sure I was searching for the right part, no
           | instructions for replacement on YouTube, etc. Fortunately you
           | could look at the drive, see that there was a PC board in
           | there which was screwed in so you could remove it and look it
           | over, google the part number.
           | 
           | Pretty sure if I had called a specialist out to repair it,
           | they would have told me it's not worth repairing, hard to get
           | parts, will just break again in a different way due to its
           | age, just get a new one. And that argument is probably both
           | true and well intended.
        
           | bertr4nd wrote:
           | So I'm one of those people who doesn't know how to fix
           | anything; I wish I did! I'll tell you what holds me back: I
           | didn't grow up around anyone particularly handy, so I don't
           | know what I don't know.
           | 
           | Simple example: I was trying to hang some shades in my kid's
           | room. First set went in fine, second set, my drill hit
           | something too hard for it (brick? Metal?). At this point I'm
           | kind of stuck. I can search Google for this scenario but it's
           | hard to know conclusively which situation I'm in, and I don't
           | know how dangerous or destructive what I'm doing could be.
           | 
           | This is probably laughable to lots of you who know,
           | intuitively from experience, what's happening and what to do,
           | but for someone who had no idea like me, it's pretty
           | intimidating.
           | 
           | (Coda: we bought stick-on shades and they were trivially easy
           | to install and worked great)
        
             | mindentropy wrote:
             | >I didn't grow up around anyone particularly handy
             | 
             | I grew up in a similar household. Fortunately I was the
             | handyman for my family. I never had tools but I used to
             | improvise. I also used to fix some of my hot wheel toy cars
             | and I longed for a soldering iron and pliers.
             | 
             | Now I really wished I could learn in a more formal way on
             | how to repair and maintain things. I have severe anxiety
             | dealing with people and the attitude and workmanship of
             | some of the repairmen makes my anxiety worse.
        
             | bombcar wrote:
             | You probably hit a "nail plate" or just happened to hit a
             | drywall screw directly.
             | 
             | It can be really hard to start off without someone to at
             | least bounce ideas off of over a beer; one of the nice
             | things about knowing handy people, for sure.
        
             | doodlebugging wrote:
             | I understand the predicament where you have a project that
             | needs to be completed but you don't have the background
             | skills to understand how to do it efficiently or at all.
             | 
             | I would like to point you to a subreddit [0] where you can
             | get answers to questions like the one you described. There
             | are lots of people like myself who hang out looking for
             | inexperienced people who just need guidance since they
             | already have the motivation.
             | 
             | [0] https://old.reddit.com/r/DIY
             | 
             | People post everything from complex projects that took them
             | multiple months to complete to ordinary maintenance tasks
             | like replacing light fixtures or door knobs.
             | 
             | I hang out there a lot. I'm a guy who grew up fixing things
             | and just never stopped even when I had the money to pay
             | someone else. I (we) don't mind passing on useful skills to
             | inexperienced people. It's very satisfying to know that
             | someone tackled a problem that they thought was difficult
             | and solved it using something you recommended.
             | 
             | Good luck!
        
           | [deleted]
        
           | veqq wrote:
           | A bit tangential, but construction isn't rising. More houses
           | were built in Los Angeles in the 50s than today. More in New
           | York in the 20s. But the populations are far larger and
           | expand more. (Hence the explosion in housing prices.)
           | 
           | Viewing the data is a bit less extreme at first:
           | https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/HOUST You can see that we
           | are around the mean today. However the population is 2x
           | larger...
        
             | mfer wrote:
             | That graph shows new development rising. It's not as high
             | as it once was but it's an upward trend. The valley was
             | around 12-13 years ago.
             | 
             | Talking to people currently in the industry, they are
             | busier than they've been in years. I know people trying to
             | find contractors for small jobs who can't.
             | 
             | NY and CA may not be having a lot of new construction. But,
             | other places are. California is seeing a population decline
        
             | bobthepanda wrote:
             | also, reduction in household sizes.
             | 
             | all wealthy countries have observed significant falls in
             | household size over the past century. tenements used to
             | have whole multigenerational households in a single room.
             | that's obviously not tenable today (and it shouldn't be)
             | but now the same amount of people needs more units.
        
         | peteradio wrote:
         | I'm similar, except a Jeep guy. I was reticent to move into the
         | new millennia Cherokees because I was worried about all the
         | computerization of everything. When push came to shove I bought
         | an adapter (Hell yes Jeep/Dodge/Ram for making this possible at
         | a reasonable price!) and changed my air springs. I was
         | initially quite pissed, who swaps coil springs for air!? But in
         | the end it was way easier than changing the leafs on my old XJ.
        
         | ambientenv wrote:
         | Two thoughts come to mind ...
         | 
         | [1] Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance [2] Shop Class as
         | Soul Craft
         | 
         | Huge impact for me over my decades here.
         | 
         | [1]
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zen_and_the_Art_of_Motorcycle_...
         | [2] http://www.matthewbcrawford.com/new-page-1-1-2
        
           | greedo wrote:
           | I would add https://www.amazon.com/Keep-Volkswagen-Alive-
           | Step-Step/dp/15...
        
         | pengaru wrote:
         | The aversion to getting one's hands dirty I've found is common
         | in software engineering as well.
         | 
         | It just takes the form of nobody wanting to inherit someone
         | else's project. Nobody wants maintenance tasks, everyone wants
         | to do green-field development or if they must inherit some
         | existing product they quickly conclude a rewrite from scratch
         | is necessary.
         | 
         | I too have a scrappy hands-dirty DIY IRL history starting with
         | childhood. When I entered the software industry after years of
         | sysadminning, it became very clear my enthusiasm for facing
         | existing complexities head-on was somewhat unique among my
         | peers as well.
         | 
         | But I think this is a more general struggle everyone encounters
         | in life; it's _always_ more attractive to create new problems
         | than solve existing ones. (I 'm pretty sure that's a quote I've
         | heard/read at some point, but its origin escapes me)
         | 
         | Some examples from other domains:
         | 
         | Relationships (my mate and I are arguing and I've been sleeping
         | on the couch, my OkCupid profile just notified me; cheat)
         | 
         | Automobiles (my car needs tires, brakes, a paint job, and
         | thorough cleaning, the car dealership down the road is having a
         | sale; new car loan)
         | 
         | Living spaces and projects/hobbies (the closet is an
         | unmitigated disaster area, I can't even open its door anymore,
         | but the spare bedroom is empty and I need to start a new
         | project rather than finish any of the dozen abandoned ones
         | occupying said closet; new projects in spare room until it too
         | overflows) This starts to look like hoarding, but it's really
         | just backing down from solving existing problems in favor of
         | making new ones.
         | 
         | The list goes on, I'm sure you can come up with a bunch of
         | examples yourself.
         | 
         | Starting anew is an immediate gratification, anything else, not
         | so much until you make forward progress which almost certainly
         | will be a slog since the immediate gratification low hanging
         | fruit phase was already burned by either past you or someone
         | else altogether.
         | 
         | Personally I find it far more rewarding to resolve existing
         | difficult problems, especially now that I have so much
         | experience that whenever I start anew I'm fully aware that I'm
         | likely making problems future me will have to deal with.
         | Existing problems usually have a bunch of evidence to
         | scrutinize and inform what you're doing to make meaningful
         | progress. _Real_ problem solving. Creating from scratch is
         | problem making.
         | 
         | Honestly I suspect it comes down to a sort of anxiety about
         | failure.
        
         | tra3 wrote:
         | > I work in the tech industry. I'm somewhat rare in that I also
         | work on my own vehicles, do my own maintenance, repair things,
         | build my own stuff around the property, etc. A lot of coworkers
         | at various places I've worked over the years view this as
         | somewhere between "eccentric" and "slightly mad." "Why would
         | you do that yourself, just pay someone else to do it!" is the
         | common sentiment.
         | 
         | I feel like it's partly a consequence of a highly specialized
         | society. I'm not sure how to fix it. There's an opportunity
         | cost. Why would I change the oil in my car when it's $40 to get
         | it changed at the shop? Since I don't change my oil, I now
         | don't know the basics of how to jack up the vehicle, I don't
         | understand how to use the torque wrench to tighten the drain
         | plug and I'm basically missing all the fundamental skills so I
         | got no knowledge to build on.
         | 
         | The other contributor, is that growing up in the city, in an
         | apartment, there was never any opportunity to work with my
         | hands. I still recall a shop class in high school. I got to use
         | a lathe and a oxy acetylene torch. That was many years ago now.
         | 
         | Now that I'm older, I make conscious effort to learn how to do
         | things with my hands. There are things that I still must
         | outsource, when they are on a critical path. For example if the
         | car is down because the suspension needs to be replaced, I'm
         | not going to spend 3 months researching and fixing it. We need
         | it now.
         | 
         | I've come to really appreciate the famous Heinlein quote:
         | 
         | > A human being should be able to change a diaper, plan an
         | invasion, butcher a hog, conn a ship, design a building, write
         | a sonnet, balance accounts, build a wall, set a bone, comfort
         | the dying, take orders, give orders, cooperate, act alone,
         | solve equations, analyse a new problem, pitch manure, program a
         | computer, cook a tasty meal, fight efficiently, die gallantly.
         | Specialization is for insects.
         | 
         | Im also very much attracted to the idea of a "renaissance man"
         | [1] :
         | 
         | > Embodying a basic tenet of Renaissance humanism that humans
         | are limitless in their capacity for development, the concept
         | led to the notion that people should embrace all knowledge and
         | develop their capacities as fully as possible.
         | 
         | "Specialization is for insects" indeed.
         | 
         | 0: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Competent_man
         | 
         | 1: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polymath
        
           | mauvehaus wrote:
           | You change your own oil so that you develop the skills to do
           | a brake job, which you do yourself to develop the skills to
           | work on the suspension.
           | 
           | That said, depending on where you live and whether or not you
           | have winter, any fasteners on the underside of your car may
           | be rusted to the point where you need the oxy-acetylene torch
           | you used in high school to get the damned things loose. The
           | nuts and bolts on the steering and suspension systems live a
           | particularly rough life.
        
           | Syonyk wrote:
           | > _Why would I change the oil in my car when it 's $40 to get
           | it changed at the shop?_
           | 
           | Because you like your car...
           | 
           | Every decade or so, I try a fast oil change place, usually
           | when I'm in a hurry, and it sells me on changing my own oil
           | for the next decade, because it's either _obscenely_
           | overpriced, they screw up my car somehow, or both.
           | 
           | Last time I took vehicles in for oil changes, it cost nearly
           | $200 for my truck (I know it takes a lot of oil, but ffs...),
           | and for the car, they didn't get the airbox back together
           | properly, so I had a nice post-air-filter leak. They even
           | left the bolt they couldn't get lined up sitting in the
           | windshield air inlet tray - because they'd not lined the
           | filter box up right. And, they forgot a crush washer on the
           | drain plug, so I had a dinner plate sized oil puddle under
           | the car in the morning. Sorry, I see no point in paying
           | someone to screw my vehicles up like that.
        
             | cagey wrote:
             | DW took our car to Costco for a free scheduled tire
             | rotation (mandatory to maintain the tire warranty) about a
             | month ago.
             | 
             | She called saying "they're saying 'the lug nut broke'"; I
             | was thinking (and asking) "how is that possible (it can't
             | possibly be a defective lug nut)?" 10 minutes later "the
             | stud is broken"; 5 minutes later "they [Costco] admitted to
             | breaking it".
             | 
             | The resolution was to have a local shop replace the lug
             | stud and get reimbursed for the repair cost: $125 (the part
             | might have cost $2)!
             | 
             | I chalk this episode up to them hiring warm bodies lacking
             | any mechanical experience or aptitude (to the extent of not
             | being aware of "righty tighty, lefty-loosey") and handing
             | them an impact wrench.
        
               | bombcar wrote:
               | Costco sheared off the locking socket for my weird
               | locking lug nuts, so I daresay they're more capable of
               | some to just uggadugga it until it (usually) works.
        
               | Syonyk wrote:
               | Huh. A couple months back, I helped someone replace a
               | broken stud in their garage with some C-clamps and
               | hammers. On a lot of vehicles, it's just "press the old
               | one out, pull the new one in."
               | 
               | But there's a reason that r/justrolledintotheshop talks
               | about "uggaduggas" as a torque spec - to make fun of the
               | people who just let an impact driver pound away at things
               | like lug nuts. Cross threaded? Screw it, more uggaduggas!
               | It'll snap when someone takes it off? _Not My Problem!_
               | 
               | Oddly enough, it's not always righty tighty. I rode
               | motorcycles that had axles that were the opposite (so
               | normal rotation would tighten them), and it was well
               | known on the forums that if you let a shop just go at it,
               | they'd try to loosen it, tighten it, smash the spacer,
               | and your wheel bearings would then fail in short order. I
               | always either watched the shop take my wheels off, or
               | just took the wheels off myself and took them in to get
               | the rubber replaced (alarmingly frequently - I was riding
               | a lot).
        
               | AngryData wrote:
               | To be fair, it might not have been Costco's fault, it
               | could have been the last guys to put the wheel on who
               | impact gunned the fuck out of it, or shitty studs or
               | lugs, or a combination of all three. That said, Costco
               | should have had zero problems replacing a broken stud on
               | the spot, any business who regularly removes wheel from
               | cars should be prepared to replace a few studs here and
               | there. It would be like hiring a guy to change your light
               | fixtures but he can't finish because he didn't bring any
               | spare wire nuts because he assumes their are already good
               | wirenuts on the old light fixtures.
        
             | AlexandrB wrote:
             | I've also had similar bad experiences, usually at large
             | "chain" garages where turnover is probably high. I think
             | it's one thing to pay a mechanic you trust to do some work
             | on your car and quite another to leave your car at a chain
             | garage where it will be prodded at by some kid fresh out of
             | high school and then taken for a joy ride to "test" it.
             | 
             | It's also not uncommon for garages to under or over torque
             | fasteners because they're in a hurry. My friend had his
             | power steering pump come off the engine block while he was
             | driving because the garage didn't bother torquing it
             | properly after replacing it.
        
           | jjav wrote:
           | > Why would I change the oil in my car when it's $40 to get
           | it changed at the shop?
           | 
           | The shop might be incompetent and strip the threads for
           | example (very common) which will cost you a lot more money
           | down the road when it's discovered and becomes a problem.
           | 
           | But, aside that, even competent shops can't provide the same
           | quality of care than DIY because they have to operate on the
           | booked time it takes to do a job. So they can't deviate from
           | doing exactly what's on the work list.
           | 
           | Meanwhile, when I work on my cars I'm taking time to look
           | around and pay attention and address any other upcoming
           | problems I might notice even if they are entirely unrelated
           | to the work I started out doing. And I clean the parts and
           | nearby parts as I go, which a shop could never afford to do
           | even if they cared.
           | 
           | Oil changes tend to be a loss leader so you can't often save
           | money by DIY (but I always DIY due to the reasons above). But
           | on other types of work you usually also save a lot of money
           | by DIY.
           | 
           | For instance I replaced the fence between us and neighbor for
           | ~$500 in materials. That neighbor had to also replace his
           | other side fence (between him and third neighbor). Identical
           | fence, but cost them over $4K to have it done by a
           | contractor.
        
         | rglover wrote:
         | Oddly, I've gotten a similar response when I tell people I'm
         | building my own house by hand instead of hiring contractors.
         | 
         | When they ask "why on earth would you do that," I just say:
         | "because we're rapidly moving toward a point where nobody
         | actually knows how to do anything because they just hired
         | someone else to do it and now those people don't exist (and
         | other people weren't interested in inheriting their knowledge).
         | 20 years down the road, I'd like to be able to fix stuff when
         | it breaks without having to wait months, years, or potentially
         | never to get it fixed."
         | 
         | There's a deep, deep need for a resurgence of DIY culture
         | across the board.
        
           | jonnycoder wrote:
           | If I had the time, I would have a house built by others when
           | it comes to concrete, framing, roof, electrical and drywall.
           | The repetitive skills those tradesmen have is far more
           | efficient than DIY. I quickly learned that by watching
           | concrete videos on youtube of professionals. For DIY, I've
           | come to appreciate the time and quality it takes to do the
           | finishing work such trim. Oil based paint with high VOCs
           | can't be bought in California unless it is small such as a
           | pint or quart, but it's the most durable and looks the nicest
           | for trim. It can be ordered online from out of state though.
        
           | avgcorrection wrote:
        
             | rglover wrote:
        
         | ce4 wrote:
         | Well written. That really resonated with me.
         | 
         | I work in IT and grew up in a locksmith/car repair shop where I
         | got my hands dirty very early on. I got my DIY/repair attitude
         | from my father who does almost anything by himself - building
         | and maintaining houses, making furniture, metal work, vehicle
         | maintenance. So that is also deeply rooted in me.
         | 
         | It's not uncommon in my circle to DIY, mostly as a hobby, to
         | save money or because availability of craftsmanship is so poor
         | (waiting months to get someone to do it).
         | 
         | I really like to get broken stuff, fix it and then use or sell
         | it. Such work leaves you with a broad knowledge, and also who
         | is designing repairable machines. Old style italian espresso
         | machines come to my mind. While only some components are
         | standardized (piping, thermostats, portafilters, e61 brew
         | group) many proprietary components needed for repairs are still
         | openly sold on 3rd party stores on the Internet. Sometimes the
         | schematic is also published. The newer and more integrated
         | plastic machines are less of a joy to work on, alas. That's
         | mostly toss-and-rebuy gear.
         | 
         | Before I buy anything, I check maintainability first. Parts
         | availability, hackability, etc. Glued stuff, soldered on chips
         | (formerly RAM, wifi, CPUs etc), nonswappable batteries, hard
         | cloud dependencies and similar scaries me.
        
         | loganwedwards wrote:
         | I am on your same wavelength. Props to you for pursuing this
         | mentality. I believe you would enjoy the book "The Innovation
         | Delusion" by Vinsel and Russell
        
         | veqq wrote:
         | Unfortunately, I've encountered the same thing. It's universal
         | though.
         | 
         | Tinkering is a lost art. Increasingly, people seem to just
         | watch others tinker or solve problems. Why do x if you can just
         | search for what happens on youtube? Why think through the
         | process or what a reasonable answer is if you can just google
         | (andisearch is good too) it? (Why search, when you can just
         | post it as a question on a forum?) 10 years ago, commenters
         | here would talk about tinkering with their systems in basic,
         | when asked how they learned to program. Nowadays, people talk
         | about textbooks or the like. But why?
         | 
         | Everything is more complex and complicated. Fixing something in
         | 1950 was easy, you could wire it yourself with copper, you
         | could replace the vacuum tubes. Nowadays, you can just replace
         | electronic parts - but you can't make the circuit board
         | yourself (well, some people do, but that's much more in depth,
         | requires very fine motor control and you are still just
         | soldering tiny components. I suspect a lot of would-have-
         | tinkereds give up when they take apart their x with a screw
         | driver and can't figure out what anything is. Their curiosity
         | nipped right in the bud, they default to trusted solutions and
         | devote less of their daily mindshare to understanding, and
         | eventually improving the world.
         | 
         | (Even there, it's not like many people could create vacuum
         | tubes in their garage in 1950 to repair something...)
        
           | Syonyk wrote:
           | You _can_ do your own surface mount soldering on boards for
           | assembly, but it 's an awful lot easier to design a single
           | sided board (at least for the surface mount stuff) and hot
           | plate it to get the solder melted. It's rather magical to
           | watch surface tension in action - parts just... _zoop_ right
           | into the positions.
           | 
           | I live in weird circles, I suppose, where this and "do your
           | own PCB etching" are still things.
        
           | outworlder wrote:
           | > but you can't make the circuit board yourself
           | 
           | True. Thankfully, they have become dirt cheap. I can design
           | and push a button to order a multilayer board from China,
           | which is going to be done by the same industrial processes as
           | any commercial boards, and will even be tested for me. I
           | don't have to worry that I left it etching for too long. Or
           | drilling holes. Or silk screening text. All that, and
           | shipping costs more than the board.
           | 
           | > I suspect a lot of would-have-tinkereds give up when they
           | take apart their x with a screw driver and can't figure out
           | what anything is
           | 
           | I suspect your memory is playing tricks with you (as it does
           | with everybody). Open an old CRT monitor and you won't know
           | what anything is. Sure, you may learn what the individual
           | components are, but you need a lot of schematic study to even
           | understand what all those components are even doing. Today,
           | we can just open a phone and go "oh, that's the wifi chip".
           | 
           | It is still possible to do SMD work at home. Air rework
           | stations have dropped from 4 digit dollars to 2 digits. Other
           | tools are getting cheaper too. Oscilloscopes have never been
           | cheaper (and, if you don't need anything fancy, at least in
           | the US there's a flood of perfectly good used models).
           | 
           | Microcontrollers are incredibly cheap. A lot of what was done
           | by hardware today can be handled with software. With <$1
           | parts.
           | 
           | 3d printing allows us to not have to drill soap containers
           | for our electronics cases.
           | 
           | Also, all those old electronics magazines? Most of those
           | circuits can be built today just fine.
           | 
           | People dabbling in electronics were always a small subset of
           | the population. I am willing to bet that, percentage wise,
           | those numbers are way bigger today.
        
           | mikrl wrote:
           | >requires very fine motor control and you are still just
           | soldering tiny components
           | 
           | I thought the key fob for my used Impreza just needed a new
           | battery but the relay had actually fallen off the board.
           | 
           | I had to buy a soldering iron and fine point tips but the
           | rush I got when it finally settled in place and I could lock
           | my car remotely was intense. Or maybe that was the lack of
           | ventilation.
           | 
           | My wheel hub and brakes on the other hand... I'd need various
           | grinders, pullers and oxyacetylene to get through 12y of
           | Ontarian corrosion. Not even a 4lb hammer on a breaker bar
           | shifted my axle nut or caliper bracket bolts. With rounds of
           | bolt blaster and blowtorch.
           | 
           | Luckily my local garage charges reasonable rates and lets me
           | supply my own parts. From here on out maintenance is gonna be
           | a breeze!
        
             | AngryData wrote:
             | If you work on older rusted vehicles, a high quality impact
             | gun and air hammer are worth every penny. A shitty impact
             | gun will take off like 60% of things, a high quality one
             | will take off 90% of things. And for the final 10%, (likely
             | in combination with torches and large breaker bars and
             | impact gun) you can air hammer the living fuck out of the
             | bolt or part for 15 minutes and it should help break apart
             | some of the rust.
             | 
             | And for future self, a tube of anti-seize.
             | 
             | I questioned the need for my heavy equipment "fuck-you"
             | sized impact gun when I bought it, but ive helped out more
             | than a couple people remove old rusted on shit with it that
             | their cheaper consumer impact gun simply couldn't handle.
        
               | mrguyorama wrote:
               | I have plenty of money for these tools but what I can't
               | afford in modern day America is a shed to put the tools
               | in, a garage to work on my car in, and an alternative
               | means of transportation to get me to the parts shop while
               | I take 3 days in my off hours trying to figure things out
               | because I'm inexperienced.
        
               | mikrl wrote:
               | I've always lived in places with crap driveways but this
               | one is nice, paved and level. Unfortunately no room for a
               | garage or shed so yea, I spend about 20 minutes hauling
               | various tools out of the basement (and hoping they don't
               | get stolen) before I can even loosen my lug nuts.
        
         | tristor wrote:
         | Same situation, hardly anyone believes me that I'm skilled in
         | construction, electrical, plumbing, electronics, and car
         | mechanics in addition to my IT skills, because hardly anyone
         | actually tinkers with things or repair them. Meanwhile, I
         | always followed my dad's advice (who was doing construction
         | when I grew up) that you should invest your time and money in
         | tools and knowledge, not in disposable things. I can
         | disassemble, repair, and reassemble nearly anything, and thanks
         | to that have built my own high quality things, repaired many
         | older high quality things, and generally structured my life
         | around "buy it for life" with repairability as part of it.
         | 
         | Unfortunately, the one exception to above is laptop & phone,
         | where I buy Apple products because they are just clearly the
         | superior option, but unfortunately are not very repairable at
         | all. Nonetheless, I kept my iPhone 8 going until just recently
         | where I finally bumped to an iPhone 14 Pro, and I have kept my
         | 2013 MacBook Pro going and am still using it, although it may
         | be replaced soon.
         | 
         | I really wish things were built to be repairable, but like you
         | I have long suspected (and cursed) the engineers who design
         | products have never actually tinkered with them so don't even
         | consider this as part of the design. They are only optimized
         | for assembly because there is a business cost reason to do so,
         | but repairability doesn't matter to them.
        
         | donkeybeer wrote:
         | Its deliberate. Things are deliberately made hard to repair so
         | you are forced to buy a new one when it breaks.
        
           | agumonkey wrote:
           | I'd say semi deliberate. Market dynamics evolved to cut
           | prices extremely low.. so manufacturers don't make enough
           | cash to want to design complex and manage parts etc.
           | 
           | Most printers are horrible.. even the assembly is hell, but
           | if you pay a pro model (6x times the price) you get a modular
           | and easy to open device.
        
           | SoftTalker wrote:
           | That's a cynical take -- I'm not sure it's untrue, but
           | another factor is cost. Things that are not meant to be
           | maintainable also tend to be cheaper to design and build
           | initially. You don't have to worry about maintenance access
           | when you design the product, or making the components
           | replaceable, or using industry-standard parts.
           | 
           | By avoiding maintenance concerns in design and production,
           | you can sell a cheaper product, and the vast majority of
           | buyers will look at purchase price and not total cost of
           | ownership when they are evaluating choices.
        
             | coldacid wrote:
             | Just because it's cynical doesn't mean it's wrong.
        
               | drstewart wrote:
               | Just because it's cynical doesn't mean it's right either.
        
         | outworlder wrote:
         | > just pay someone else to do it
         | 
         | Sometimes that's what you have to do. I generally like to have
         | at least a cursory understanding of what the person I'm paying
         | is doing.
         | 
         | > Well, it doesn't matter if it's easy to fix, we'll just
         | recycle it and build a new one
         | 
         | Last night I've diagnosed the problem with a Z80 computer - the
         | one I wrote my first lines of code in 1988. It _cannot be
         | replaced_. I 'm waiting for a chip to come from China to fix.
         | Cost $1.50 + my spare time.
         | 
         | Some things just have to be recycled and rebuild. Batteries
         | come to mind. Modern cars should be getting progressively
         | easier to repair - they have onboard computers that basically
         | _know_ what's wrong. But the parts we replace are getting
         | larger and larger. Where we would replace a capacitor, we are
         | replacing entire computers.
        
           | bombcar wrote:
           | Some things it's worth paying for because the person you're
           | paying has years of experience - I can hang and tape drywall
           | but I absolutely suck at it and will willingly pay to get
           | that done.
           | 
           | Other things are worth paying for because the tools to do it
           | easy are very expensive.
           | 
           | But in many of those cases, you should still have a general
           | idea of what is going on, or have hired someone who does
           | (this is often the general contractor).
        
         | mauvehaus wrote:
         | Owned an '86 Subaru BRAT GL (EA81, not EA82). You could take
         | the whole damned car apart with a 10mm, 12mm, 14mm, and 17mm
         | socket. The 4 speed 4wd (not awd, that came later)
         | transmission, however, is a pain in the ass to get apart. I had
         | to do that to replace the input shaft seal. It was a great car.
         | 
         | Nowadays, the running joke in the Subaru community is that you
         | change the spark plugs any time you have the engine out of the
         | car whether they're due or not. My wife has a 2018 Impreza.
         | It's somewhat more cramped in the engine compartment. I dread
         | the day I have to work on it.
        
           | mcguire wrote:
           | I have a 1995 BMW R1100GS. You could do almost _anything_ to
           | that motorcycle using the toolkit that lives under the seat.
           | 
           | The one exception is checking the valve clearances; that
           | requires feeler gauges that weirdly aren't included (although
           | the kit includes feelers for the ABS sensors and valve checks
           | are necessary every oil change). I haven't replaced the final
           | drive lube because, without removing the rear end, it
           | requires suspending the motorcycle vertically, although I
           | have siphoned much of the lube out and replaced that.
        
           | mistrial9 wrote:
           | re transmission -- someone told me a long time ago, you
           | really do not want to open a transmission
        
             | Syonyk wrote:
             | A manual isn't that bad, and I know people who work on
             | them, but the main problem is that they're just an
             | _entirely_ different set of tools and techniques from just
             | about everything else. You need a bunch of different tools
             | for  "rotating part" assembly and disassembly, and a bunch
             | of different skills. Mostly, manual transmissions don't
             | fail randomly, though.
             | 
             | Automatics be black magic boxes that will fail expensively,
             | though. :/
        
               | mauvehaus wrote:
               | Precisely this. If you don't need to actually rebuild a
               | manual and just need to get to a seal that can only be
               | replaced by cracking the case apart, it's not that bad.
               | There just isn't _that_ much to a manual.
               | 
               | Keep it clean, and work with care and diligence, and
               | you're probably not going to get in truly deep shit.
               | 
               | I'll second that a manual in normal service is unlikely
               | to fail catastrophically. The synchros can wear or the
               | transmission can start popping out of gear, but they tend
               | to experience graceful degradation, and the control
               | software is sufficiently adaptable to work around the
               | quirks.
        
             | SoftTalker wrote:
             | Not true at all. They do have a scary reputation and unlike
             | a lot of other vehicle maintenance, you need to be very
             | aware of cleanliness. But they are just mechanical devices.
             | They can be taken apart, worn components replaced, and
             | reassembled. Watch Gary Ferraro on YouTube if you're
             | interested.
        
         | MomoXenosaga wrote:
         | Labor costs in the Netherlands are frankly insane. Unless you
         | are paying under the table there's no reason to have someone
         | fix a coffee machine or vacuum cleaner. As for laptops,
         | printers etcetera you can just get a tax rebate and buy new
         | ones.
        
         | zwieback wrote:
         | I work in the tech industry as well but in a more hands-on
         | division (hp inkjet) and in a small town (Corvallis OR). Here
         | it's the norm to work on your own stuff, build your own
         | structures or fix cars, really mostly for fun and out of pride
         | than for economical reasons.
         | 
         | I think this attitude does carry over into our product design
         | efforts but only to a degree - in consumer tech it makes sense
         | to make your product somewhat robust and serviceable but a
         | device from 10 years ago, with lo-speed Wifi, no bluetooth, no
         | USB, etc. just isn't useful anymore. On the flipside, the
         | manufacturing tools we design for our own use are so robust and
         | reconfigurable that they are still cranking out product 20+
         | years later.
        
           | bee_rider wrote:
           | Is a printer with low-speed WiFi really so obsolete? I can't
           | really imagine that that is the bottleneck while printing (of
           | course, lots of more recent printers have lost the ethernet
           | jacks, so really they are downgrades).
        
       | Animats wrote:
       | Is this a US thing?
       | 
       | Here's a girl mechanic in China.[1] She's from a small village in
       | the mountains, was able to go to a technical school in Kumming to
       | learn hydropower, and came back to her village. She has a popular
       | YouTube channel, so she's making money off of that, as well as
       | repairing broken engines and generators in the village.
       | 
       | Having restored rusty Teletype machines myself, I'm impressed
       | with what she's doing. She routinely rewinds generator armatures,
       | which is almost a dead art in the US. (There's one guy in San
       | Francisco who still does that, and he has a backlog. He never got
       | to the Teletype motors I wanted done. Urgent projects for old
       | freight elevators and industrial equipment keep him busy.) She's
       | an artist with an angle grinder, making parts from sheet steel.
       | She cuts curves with an angle grinder, something usually done
       | with a bandsaw. Her welding is so-so, but she is using a crappy
       | AC welder.
       | 
       | The engines she works on, usually small Diesels in the 5-30 KW
       | range, are very basic and maintainable. They're a standard design
       | in China from the Mao era. Look up "R175 Diesel engine". Hand
       | crank start, cooling system is a water tank you have to fill when
       | you refuel, no oil pump. You can buy one on Alibaba for under
       | US$200, shipping not included.[2]
       | 
       | There are people who post claiming she's fake. But there are many
       | hours of videos showing her work. Once or twice, there are
       | indications of outside help with heavy lifting, but that's about
       | it. There are more informed nit-picks - getting paint on the
       | mating faces of the cylinder head may cause leaks later, banging
       | on bearings with a claw hammer can damage the bearing races, and
       | those motors really need to go out the door with a motor
       | protection circuit breaker (US$6 on Alibaba) so they don't burn
       | out the windings again. But all this stuff is overbuilt, to
       | survive years of minimal maintenance in agricultural villages.
       | 
       | Although her electrical safety is scary. No strain relief where
       | cables enter boxes, plain wires rather than nonmetallic armored
       | behind walls when remodeling, standing in a stream while holding
       | an outlet strip.
       | 
       | [1] https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCpPt42tLH5FRk__ytvMsejw
       | 
       | [2] https://www.alibaba.com/product-detail/R175-Diesel-Engine-
       | En...
        
         | drstewart wrote:
         | >Is this a US thing?
         | 
         | I like how one counter-example from China means that something
         | is a "US thing". This happens a lot on the internet: "Here's a
         | non-US counter example, that must mean this is US only!"
         | 
         | Here's a YouTube channel that restores things in the US:
         | https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCPygLEFniGZmehxouDK-vbw
        
         | Kerrick wrote:
         | I think it's an urban thing. I live in a rural area in the US,
         | and there are multiple people who make their living maintaining
         | small engine machines (e.g. lawn tools), maintaining tractors,
         | maintaining cars, maintaining roads (gravel roads need at least
         | annual maintenance), maintaining HVAC systems, and maintaining
         | fence lines. Plus, lots of folks do their own maintenance.
        
         | coldacid wrote:
         | >Is this a US thing?
         | 
         | If it is, it's also a Canadian thing, and a western European
         | thing, at the very least.
        
           | mindentropy wrote:
           | My colleague in Germany showed his in-law's house and he said
           | that his father in-law built the whole house by himself. Is
           | this something common in Western Europe and especially
           | Germany? I was very impressed as this is something very rare
           | in my country.
        
           | Scoundreller wrote:
           | This is why I buy Toyotas: someone in the world knows how to
           | fix it and/or makes/warehouses spares for it.
        
           | yamtaddle wrote:
           | The key component is _stuff_ being one hell of a lot cheaper
           | than _labor_.
           | 
           | This is a natural outcome of a combination of rising wages
           | and dropping prices for finished products, plus, in some
           | cases, increasing standards--for example, single-pane windows
           | with glass held in by paste were really easy to repair but
           | provided almost no insulation--modern windows are really hard
           | to repair, but insulate well.
           | 
           | If we want repair-culture to come back we have to make
           | everyone materially poorer first. Everyone who's not crazy-
           | rich would know how to sew if a t-shirt cost $100 new and
           | could be sold used for $50, instead of like $10-15 and $0-3,
           | respectively. Nobody pays a cobbler $150 to re-sole their $50
           | sneakers--their $400 leather oxfords, maybe.
           | 
           | We stopped repairing stuff because stuff is cheap--it's not
           | worth developing or maintaining repair skills to try to get
           | another year out of the odd $20-$150 appliance, or tens-of-
           | dollars pieces of clothing, or paying five times as much for
           | floor trim that can be re-finished or repaired when it gets
           | dinged up, over cheap crap that'll just have to be replaced
           | if it gets damaged, when the labor to replace it's not much
           | different from the labor to repair the nicer stuff. We
           | stopped having experts repair stuff because labor is really,
           | really expensive relative to goods, now. We just throw away
           | the broken thing and replace it. The fix, if we want one, is
           | to make stuff way more expensive.
        
             | maerF0x0 wrote:
             | > we have to make everyone materially poorer first.
             | 
             | that's false. We can also make repairs materially faster
             | (more productive).
             | 
             | Just to illustrate the point with something extreme. If a
             | worker could fix 100 fridges a day, they'd only have to
             | charge like $5 labor.
        
               | yamtaddle wrote:
               | This is a good point, and might actually be viable in
               | some cases. Though I think most of those end up looking
               | less like what we'd think of as repair and more like, I
               | dunno, replacing the batteries in a remote control, or
               | lightbulbs in a lamp. Not that that's necessarily a bad
               | thing, but it's also probably not easy to engineer into a
               | lot of products, especially without driving up the price
               | significantly.
        
             | soperj wrote:
             | > Nobody pays a cobbler $150 to re-sole their $50 sneakers
             | --their $400 leather oxfords, maybe.
             | 
             | I paid a cobbler $90 to resole(and re-cork) my birkenstocks
             | after 2.5 years. It's been 4 years since I've done it, and
             | they aren't even close to where they were when he did it. I
             | honestly just wish I'd done it sooner. He re-corked them as
             | well, but some of that is now falling apart. Might have to
             | go back.
        
               | DwnVoteHoneyPot wrote:
               | uh, aren't birkenstocks cork sandals... so if you replace
               | the cork and rubber soles, it's pretty much a new sandal?
               | It's like the question: if you replace the handle of an
               | axe one year and then axe head the next year, is it still
               | the same axe?
        
               | soperj wrote:
               | No, the main part is the leather. Not all the cork was
               | replaced either, it was just firmed up. Regardless, it's
               | still lasted twice as long as a resole (and I didn't have
               | to break them in) for half the price of new, and they're
               | still going strong.
        
             | donmaq wrote:
             | > We stopped repairing stuff because stuff is cheap
             | 
             | However, OP's main example is the NYC metro system, which
             | is decidedly not cheap. A similar problem occurred in SF:
             | BART cars are being replaced with multi-$M cars full of
             | electronics & are now having numerous breakdowns.
             | 
             | BART drivers used to reboot the old trains by flipping 4
             | sets of switches. Now the reset process has hundreds of
             | steps, so most drivers just take the car offline & call for
             | a mechanic. And there's far more failure modes to the new
             | cars as well. Thus: the new cars are more expensive, more
             | fragile, & harder to maintain. BART scored a perfect
             | 'Reverse Better-Faster-Cheaper'.
             | 
             | How did this happen? Politics & payola. The new proposed
             | cars were barely shown to the public, & only for UX/design
             | feedback.
             | 
             | The tie-in's to capitalism that OP describes are apt too:
             | very big companies tendered their bids for these new cars.
             | Maintainability wasn't a key design feature. It's not just
             | our economic system (capitalism) that isn't interested in
             | maintainability- our political system isn't either.
             | Decision makers who won't be in power to see the need for
             | their shiny new acquisitions to be maintained, never seen
             | to care that they will.
        
               | Animats wrote:
               | How do you build modern electronics for a 30-50 year
               | lifespan? What parts do you use?
               | 
               | I happen to know that the Ford EEC-IV engine control
               | module of the 1980s was designed for a 30-year lifespan.
               | Which it delivered; many 1980s vehicles are still running
               | with it. But newer electronics won't last that long. Line
               | sizes are too small, and minor effects such as
               | electromigration cause wear-out.
        
             | Mountain_Skies wrote:
             | Long ago, the gameshow 'Wheel of Fortune' made players
             | spend the money they won on selection of prizes instead of
             | getting cash. Watching an old episode recently, I put the
             | price of the refrigerator into an inflation calculator and
             | was astonished by just how expensive it was, relatively
             | speaking, back then. No doubt that was the MSRP and could
             | be purchased for less at Sears, but it still was a shock to
             | see how much more expensive such goods were back then.
             | Ditto for exercise equipment. We've become so accustomed to
             | even large appliances being relatively inexpensive that we
             | tolerate them being mostly disposable instead of
             | repairable.
        
               | yamtaddle wrote:
               | Right--most of our _stuff_ is so very much cheaper,
               | especially relative to wages, than it was even in the
               | 1980s, let alone earlier. Of course we aren 't as
               | interested in repairing our stuff, either DIY or paying
               | to have it repaired.
               | 
               | This goes for food, too. Articles about food waste can be
               | read as articles lamenting that food's so cheap it's not
               | worth trying to recover all that waste.
               | 
               | I'm pretty far from a free-market superfan, but these two
               | particular, perennial stories--"can you _believe_ how
               | much food waste there is?! What a tragedy! " and "nobody
               | repairs anything anymore, what a shame"--amount to
               | complaining that shit's way too cheap, to my eye.
               | Neither's due to carelessness or wastefulness or
               | laziness, really, but _economy_. Quintuple the prices on
               | everything and watch food waste plummet and interest in
               | repair skills achieve levels not seen in decades. But,
               | like... I 'd rather we not.
        
               | Ekaros wrote:
               | It is actually amazing jus how cheap the low end stuff
               | is. Just look at pretty much anything.
               | 
               | Next step to think is that if they can make that for that
               | price. What are we paying for when the price is 2x, 3x,
               | 5x or more? Is the quality and longevity really similar
               | or is there something shared...
        
             | avgcorrection wrote:
             | Hah, "fix". Basics like food and electricity is already
             | becoming way more expensive.
             | 
             | Don't get how someone can write multiple paragraphs on this
             | stuff and not mention "planned obsolesence". Consumer
             | capitalism is not a lifestyle but an economic system. Every
             | household is supposed to have 1-2 cars, one lawnmower, one
             | electric snow blower, one chainsaw, one of every this and
             | that tool, and so on. And everyone is supposed to buy
             | something new when these things break down. Not
             | fundamentally because labor is expensive but fundamentally
             | because consumer capitalism demands consumption.
        
             | hnthrowaway0328 wrote:
             | In China it's a bit different (or maybe the same thing):
             | The key component is _stuff_ being not very affordable than
             | one 's _salary_. This is no longer true for many Chinese so
             | we are losing the arts anyway. For example my father was
             | never a professional carpenter but he made his own wedding
             | furnitures including a double bed. He did probably know
             | some carpentry from his early work in the factory /farm
             | though.
        
         | aaron695 wrote:
        
         | mindentropy wrote:
         | I love maintenance and salvage videos. It is so addictive
         | especially machines and electronics. I would recommend Diesel
         | Creek videos ( https://www.youtube.com/c/DieselCreek ) which is
         | really fun. I am in awe at some of the old American diesel
         | machines and how resilient they are.
        
       | ptero wrote:
       | I think a missing part for the propagation of those skill is
       | being able to learn it as a hobby / side project.
       | 
       | I would _love_ to take some classes (and sign up my teenage son,
       | too), but the adult education classes that I could find in the
       | Boston area do not teach basic woodworking, metalworking,
       | electrical, engines skills anymore (I heard insurance is blamed
       | way more frequently than lack of interest). I would gladly pay
       | good money for tuition and access to a machine shop, but it is
       | impossible to find any options.
       | 
       | Edit: to clarify, I am treating this as a hobby (I am happy with
       | my job working on algorithms for things that fly), not a full-
       | time trade program.
        
         | soperj wrote:
         | I've been pretty happy with hand tools for woodworking for what
         | it's worth. Cheap(except for the wood), and it's hard to cut
         | off your own arms with hand tools. Lots of good youtube
         | channels (Paul Sellers is awesome).
        
         | hnthrowaway0328 wrote:
         | Even if there are classes, it's almost surely that they are NOT
         | going to be evening classes. In Canada we have vocational
         | schools and you can have full training for 1-1.5 years, but the
         | problem is, how do I do it when I have a full-time job?
         | 
         | Maybe YouTube videos work too, but I really do not have
         | confidence changing toilets or laying out my own plank wood.
         | Like, how many times do I renovate in my LIFE? Probably just
         | 3-4 times, so if I fuck up once I pretty much take away all
         | values from the other 2-3.
        
         | Ancalagon wrote:
         | Nevermind adult education, these skills aren't usually taught
         | at even a high school level anymore.
         | 
         | My highschool had the most garbage technical curriculum
         | (southwest US).
        
         | mrguyorama wrote:
         | My rural northern maine town high school had a "Vocational
         | wing" that taught classes from nursing prep, to childhood
         | development, to cooking, sewing, running a greenhouse growing
         | vegetables, heavy equipment operation including getting your
         | CDL, a class to become a car mechanic, CompTIA+ certification
         | class, entry level business management, etc etc etc. These
         | programs are dirt cheap to run because the educators are paid
         | pennies, and the equipment (computers, loaders, etc) are all
         | local trash procured through people knowing people. Consider
         | spending time in local school board meetings to vouch for these
         | types of programs. Even the "traditional" students aiming for
         | AP classes and 4 year college degrees love these classes.
         | 
         | For more urban places, look for makerspaces or hacker spaces.
         | If you find one that doesn't have the stuff you are looking
         | for, consider donating some entry level versions. One huge
         | problem for urban centers like this is just how much space
         | machinery takes up. You need a large open shop, and that costs
         | a lot.
        
         | sct202 wrote:
         | A lot of art studios and makerspaces will teach basic
         | woodworking and metalworking (usually jewelry or decorative
         | though).
        
         | greedo wrote:
         | The university in my town has an Innovation Studio that has
         | woodworking, metalworking, ceramic, textiles, 3d printing,
         | basically everything maker related. Students get in for a cheap
         | rate, non-students pay around $75/month. Not a bad deal really,
         | to get access to all sorts of equipment and classes on how to
         | use the gear. Even has some fancy CNC mills and laser cutters.
         | Perfect for the hobbyist, or maker wanting to expand their
         | skillset.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2022-09-27 23:01 UTC)