[HN Gopher] High speed Morse telegraphy using a straight key [vi...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       High speed Morse telegraphy using a straight key [video] (2011)
        
       Author : raptorraver
       Score  : 20 points
       Date   : 2022-09-19 06:34 UTC (1 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.youtube.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.youtube.com)
        
       | asix66 wrote:
       | Morse code, or CW, is very alive and well [1].
       | 
       | [1] https://longislandcwclub.org/
        
       | sparrish wrote:
       | Great demonstration of skill from someone who's used it for
       | thousands of hours. Impressive.
        
       | waynesonfire wrote:
       | ah shit, it's not even plugged in.
        
       | vvoid wrote:
       | And if you want to hear what morse telegraphy sounds like in
       | 2022, you're in luck because it's still alive and well. Simply
       | tune your shortwave radio to 7.028-7.045 or 14.028-14.045 MHz
       | every Wednesday between 1300-1400z & 1900-2000z, and every
       | Thursday at 0300-0400z & 0700-0800z. Or, try 7.050-7.060 MHz any
       | evening to listen for operators using straight keys.
       | 
       | If you do not have a shortwave radio there are plenty online at
       | http://websdr.org/.
        
         | hn_throwaway_99 wrote:
         | I'm always curious about how long this will continue (e.g. see
         | the recent post on how Gen Z never learned cursive).
         | 
         | I got my ham radio license (since lapsed a long time ago) when
         | I was a kid, back when you still had to pass a Morse code test.
         | I was totally infatuated by it, and remember the excitement of
         | being able to communicate with folks all around the world. I
         | just lost interest with it when the Internet became widespread.
         | 
         | Also, unrelated point, but another reason that what this guy is
         | doing is so impressive is that he is using a straight key. When
         | I was a ham radio operator, pretty much all the ham's I knew
         | used paddle keys, where you press the paddle to the right to
         | get the "dots", and to the left to get the "dashes", but the
         | interrupts are automatically done for you (i.e. holding it to
         | the right gives you "dot dot dot ..." and holding it to the
         | left gives you "dash dash dash ...", and the speed is set with
         | a dial setting on the key), no need to tap. I can't imagine
         | being this fast with a paddle key, let alone a straight key.
        
           | kube-system wrote:
           | You can do CW entirely in software without learning it. I've
           | been considering trying this out because the lower bands that
           | technicians are permitted to use here in the US are CW and
           | not voice.
        
             | vitaflo wrote:
             | Most of the software that decodes CW isn't that great
             | unless you have a consistent S9 signal and the keying is
             | even (IE, not straight keyed). Once the signal wanders or
             | is even partially in the noise the software will just spit
             | out gibberish but a human would still easily be able to
             | copy it.
        
           | vitaflo wrote:
           | There was a bit of a resurgence of CW during the pandemic. I
           | know a few people who took to learning it during that time.
           | Will it continue? I don't know but there seems to be more CW
           | traffic than SSB some days. So it's certainly not dying.
        
           | vvoid wrote:
           | That's a fair question. The time slots I called out above are
           | occupied by learners in the CWops academy. The density of
           | transmissions can be so high that the waterfall resemble the
           | opening to the Matrix. But clearly demographics are stacked
           | against this part of the hobby.
        
           | NegativeLatency wrote:
           | The modern replacement seems to be some of the new mesh
           | packet radio systems. Hard to argue with the
           | simplicity/resiliency of the current setup though.
           | 
           | I've been ready to take the HAM test for a while but just
           | keep procrastinating on doing it.
        
       | olliecornelia wrote:
       | I really have no sense of the speed or accuracy of what he's
       | doing. If we assume he started that page right when the video
       | started it works out to 168 characters per minute. That sounds
       | like a lot; is that good?
        
       | WalterBright wrote:
       | The telegraph network was the true origin of the internet.
        
         | tialaramex wrote:
         | I don't think this really follows. A crucial thing about the
         | Third Network (made with the Internet Protocol, but in a
         | parallel universe it could have been X.25) was that it's packet
         | switched. The telegraph network is connection oriented in
         | practice, like the Second Network (the PSTN).
        
           | nomel wrote:
           | I think you're on the wrong abstraction layer. The telegraph
           | was the physical layer. Messages from telegraphs would be
           | passed to other lines, or even other systems (telephone,
           | mail, etc) if the person meant to be contacted wasn't
           | standing right there.
        
         | retrac wrote:
         | Absolutely. Circa 1900, the delay from a major event occurring
         | in New Zealand, and newspapers carrying the story in London,
         | could be as little as a few hours. And the 24 hour news cycle
         | was born. The revolution wasn't just for the newspapers,
         | either. Telegraphy meant you could sell your ship's cargo at
         | the destination port before you even arrived! No more prices
         | always two weeks out of date. And so the modern supply chain
         | was born, too. (As I understand it, that economic force, more
         | than anything else, is what really financed the first
         | transatlantic cables.)
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2022-09-20 23:01 UTC)