[HN Gopher] A Microfluidic D-subminiature Connector (2013)
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       A Microfluidic D-subminiature Connector (2013)
        
       Author : trasz
       Score  : 50 points
       Date   : 2022-09-18 11:26 UTC (1 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov)
        
       | exabrial wrote:
       | I could see this being useful for control system monitoring
       | (monitoring a bunch of hydraulic pressures) or in a lab for an
       | automated testing machine (pull in samples at regular intervals)
        
         | Arrath wrote:
         | The 15psi that the connector was tested at is a good ways below
         | the typical working pressures of most hydraulic systems, I'd be
         | curious to see just how high the connector could manage.
        
       | ncmncm wrote:
       | It is commendable that they did not ignorantly call it a D _B_ -9
       | connector, but lamentable that they did not identify it as the D
       | _E_ -9 it really is.
        
       | Scene_Cast2 wrote:
       | I remember microfluidics research being somewhat in vogue a
       | decade ago. Asking as a complete layman - did any practical
       | applications come out of it? Any use in the industry?
        
         | bglazer wrote:
         | Single cell RNA sequencing is a very useful technique that
         | relies on microfluidics. It allows researchers to isolate
         | individual cells then "read" the RNA content of them. This lets
         | you identify (very approximately) what behaviors a cell is
         | doing in the tissue it came from. Still mostly a research tool,
         | but it's going to move into the clinic in the next 10 years,
         | I'd guess.
         | 
         | 10x Genomics (https://www.10xgenomics.com/) is the biggest
         | company building the machines for this. They're publicly
         | traded.
        
         | rubidium wrote:
         | Yes, lots of uses.
         | 
         | One of the bigger hits was Berkeley Lights, a big deal in early
         | cell line development for monoclonal antibodies:
         | https://www.berkeleylights.com/technology/
         | 
         | But there's be numerous others. All have advanced state of the
         | art. But as another commenter said, not much for home use. Just
         | industry.
        
         | chris_va wrote:
         | Yes, mRNA vaccine manufacturing (lipid encapsulation) is a nice
         | example
        
         | ros86 wrote:
         | There are indeed a few practical applications. Next to Berkely
         | lights, there is e.g. the LabChip from PerkinElmer that
         | separates DNA and proteins. I had hoped that there would be
         | many more examples by now. Most presentations that I see about
         | microfluids still go in a lot of detail on how difficult it is
         | to make. This hasn't really changed over the last decade, which
         | signals to me we still need quite some innovation to make this
         | mainstream.
         | 
         | If you want to play around with digital microfluids at home,
         | check out the OpenDrop from gaudi.ch
         | (http://www.gaudi.ch/OpenDrop/). I haven't played around with
         | it yet, as I haven't found a practical use of this.
        
         | jhallenworld wrote:
         | According to "Asianometry", common test strips are an
         | application of microfluidics. So in one sense they are very
         | common.
         | 
         | Aside from these, it sounds like they will become lab tools not
         | the Theranos-style lab replacements.
         | 
         | See:
         | 
         | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NAESOEjcYfc
        
         | jpopesculian wrote:
         | I recently heard of haptx[0] and I think they use microfluidics
         | for their haptic feedback stuff
         | 
         | [0](https://haptx.com/)
        
         | dark-star wrote:
         | As with many of these "laboratory" technologies, there is not
         | much an "end-user" would see of it.
         | 
         | Microfluidics is being used in large scales in biological labs
         | for sample analysis etc., so yes, there are practical
         | applications but none that any random household needs or could
         | even make any use of :)
        
       | kongito wrote:
       | If you _really_ want D-sub connectors for fluid pipes, you could
       | better use a proper 17W2 shell with fluid pins in the place of
       | power contacts: https://uk.rs-online.com/web/p/d-sub-
       | contacts/6659904 https://www.deltron.ch/produkte/d-sub-
       | steckverbinder/combi.h...
       | https://www.deltron.ch/downloads/dl/file/id/14/d_sub_combi_p...
        
         | dark-star wrote:
         | I think the "micro" in "microfluidic" is kinda relevant here...
        
       | myself248 wrote:
       | There are gas and liquid "pins" for a number of standard
       | connectors, both the mil-spec circular style and the modular
       | Harting style. They're not so "micro" as this, but very much in
       | use in industry.
        
       | palijer wrote:
       | Pros: existing tools and knowledge transfer over, d-subs have
       | been field proven and plenty of experience exists for folks who
       | worked with them.
       | 
       | Cons: it is now possible to connect microfluidic connections to
       | electrical, or use the wrong sort of couplers, or a bunch of
       | other issues that pose risks to new uses and existing usages of
       | electrical d-sub connections.
       | 
       | Like, imagine if they used regular Edison power cables, or HDMI
       | etc. Sometimes there are good reasons not to use existing
       | standards.
        
         | MisterTea wrote:
         | > Edison power cables
         | 
         | Edison power cable?
        
           | dekhn wrote:
           | standard american power cord for 120V
        
         | elil17 wrote:
         | I wouldn't really say that it's a proven technology because the
         | core issue for microfluidic applications is having a air- and
         | water-tight connection, which is not proven out by electrical
         | connectors of any sort.
        
         | dark-star wrote:
         | I don't think there is any real danger in connecting an
         | "electrical" sub-d to a "fluid" sub-d. You'd just have a non-
         | working connection from both sides.
         | 
         | It's similar to many devices having RJ-45 serial console ports,
         | that look like network ports, and if you accidentally connect
         | the wrong cable to it, nothing bad happens.
         | 
         | On the other hand, I could really see hybrid connectors as a
         | solution, i.e. have 4 electrical pins and 5 fluid pins. That
         | way you could have some signalling between the devices and not
         | start pushing fluid through the tubes unless a "correct" device
         | is attached.
        
           | dekhn wrote:
           | The fluids contain charges and salts, I could see all sorts
           | of corrosion and shorting damage.
        
           | actionfromafar wrote:
           | I think the Borg used that.
        
           | yuubi wrote:
           | if a pin expects rs232, and you give it 120v ac, or saline,
        
             | dodslaser wrote:
             | Why not both?
        
           | kube-system wrote:
           | > One of the key barriers to the widespread adoption of
           | microfluidic technology outside of specialized research
           | laboratories (e.g. in clinical settings) is that microfluidic
           | devices are often complex to operate.
           | 
           | If their goal is to make something for clinical applications,
           | having an unexpectedly non-working connection could be a
           | problem. Non-"standard" RJ45 and DB9 connections are
           | _notorious_ for confusing end users.
        
         | nyanpasu64 wrote:
         | We're fast approaching HDMI to garden hose connectors in real
         | life.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2022-09-19 23:02 UTC)