[HN Gopher] Vitalik Buterin's philosophical essays: they're not ...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Vitalik Buterin's philosophical essays: they're not good
        
       Author : davidgerard
       Score  : 10 points
       Date   : 2022-09-16 22:01 UTC (1 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (davidgerard.co.uk)
 (TXT) w3m dump (davidgerard.co.uk)
        
       | wmf wrote:
       | Maybe Vitalik should take Balaji's advice and write under a
       | pseudonym. I wonder how much attention his writing would get.
        
       | lazzlazzlazz wrote:
       | I didn't have a lot of respect for David Girard before this, and
       | this essay really made me certain: David Girard is not very
       | sharp. I revisited a few of Vitalik's recent essays and in all
       | honesty believe they're lucid[1] and content-rich[2] even when he
       | strays outside his domain of specialization[3].
       | 
       | Girard seems like a mid-tier but highly-focused motivated
       | reasoner[4] who is working on a specific brand of anti-tech
       | journalism. Nothing to see here really, even if you dislike
       | crypto and Vitalik's projects.
       | 
       | [1]: https://vitalik.ca/general/2022/09/09/ens.html
       | 
       | [2]: https://vitalik.ca/general/2022/08/04/zkevm.html
       | 
       | [3]: https://vitalik.ca/general/2022/07/13/networkstates.html
       | 
       | [4]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motivated_reasoning
        
       | chrisbigelow wrote:
       | > Buterin comes from a long tradition of Silicon Valley special
       | smart boys, who have had it hammered into them that domain
       | expertise -- i.e., actually knowing stuff -- pales into
       | insignificance compared to pulling ideas out of your backside by
       | virtue of your superior intelligence and upbringing and social
       | position.
       | 
       | I detest this worldview. New knowledge is formed through creative
       | conjecture and criticism. The creation of new ideas being
       | restricted to only experts, those who "actually know stuff"
       | shrinks the pool of creators of new knowledge. What we should
       | strive for is better explanations of reality, not a restriction
       | on who can make those explanations.
        
       | smoldesu wrote:
       | Vitalik Buterin is indeed a smart guy with his heart in the right
       | place, but every time he opens his mouth the nerd in me winces
       | and prepares for impact. Even when cryptocurrency interested me,
       | I found his talks to be weirdly insufferable and content-adverse.
       | It's interesting to see more people share the opinion that his
       | musings aren't really hard-hitting.
        
         | TraitorJoes wrote:
         | .
        
           | mikewave wrote:
           | Is there any evidence Buterin is on the spectrum, rather than
           | just being a Standard Nerd?
        
       | exolymph wrote:
       | Context note: David Gerard is the dude who tried to get Scott
       | Alexander canceled. He fed a lot of dirt to that NYT reporter.
       | Whether you think his crusade is legitimate is up to you, but I
       | figure y'all might want to know who you're reading.
        
         | codewithcheese wrote:
         | Thanks, didnt know that. What was his stated motivation?
        
           | davidgerard wrote:
           | I'm eager to find out!
        
       | gjvc wrote:
       | I've always thought that the bitcoin paper isn't as well-written
       | as some people make it out to be.
        
         | TraitorJoes wrote:
        
           | slater wrote:
           | Luckily for us, your hn posts don't matter, either.
        
             | [deleted]
        
       | [deleted]
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2022-09-16 23:01 UTC)