[HN Gopher] Learning in double time: The effect of lecture video...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Learning in double time: The effect of lecture video speed on
       comprehension
        
       Author : ibobev
       Score  : 11 points
       Date   : 2022-09-12 19:51 UTC (3 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (onlinelibrary.wiley.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (onlinelibrary.wiley.com)
        
       | anagram666 wrote:
       | In other news: Watching a video at 3x can make you learn very
       | little but it is three times fast!
        
       | ars wrote:
       | Does this surprise anyone?
       | 
       | You can read a lot faster than you can talk. Which also means you
       | can comprehend a lot faster than people can talk to you.
       | 
       | Or in other words speed up the video playback to match your
       | typical reading speed.
       | 
       | Some people are very mumbly and hard to understand at higher
       | speeds. But most of the time it works great. Bonus points if the
       | video includes closed captions.
       | 
       | I've had a number of teens tell me that they watch TV shows and
       | movies at 1.25 or 1.5 speed. So it's not limited to educational
       | content.
        
       | eimrine wrote:
       | I wish my video playing device has some hardware buttons for
       | smoothly setting speed from 0.25x to 10x, Youtube can not play
       | sound if the speed is more than 4x. Also I want some handy way of
       | going few seconds ago and relisten that short interval with less
       | speed. Sometimes only one word is misheard but returning to that
       | moment might be a problem on some devices.
        
         | gausswho wrote:
         | I suspect you are referring to a device without a keyboard. I
         | find my YouTube experience much better on a laptop for access
         | to these shortcuts: https://www.mrfdev.com/youtube-keyboard-
         | shortcuts
         | 
         | To do what you're asking would be left arrow (back 5 seconds)
         | and shift+comma (reduce playing speed).
         | 
         | As a bonus you get extensions/add-ons that improve the whole
         | experience.
         | 
         | It's sad how (unsolvably?) lame YouTube is on a phone, once you
         | get used to this.
        
       | imranq wrote:
       | Ive found that if i spend just a few minutes defining what i want
       | to gain out of any content, i can learn at 100x the speed of just
       | thoughtlessly consuming.
       | 
       | Sometimes even infinite times if I realize the content isn't
       | worth consuming at all
        
       | bzmrgonz wrote:
       | I think the benefit comes from exercising(training) the brain to
       | identify/translate/transmit sensory data (video/audio) faster.
       | It's like having a conversation with an 80 yo grandma vs. talking
       | to a fast witty talker. The brain needs to adjust to the word
       | rate. I think this is one way to develop speed "on your feet" as
       | the saying goes.
        
       | faebi wrote:
       | Or double your watch time by letting it run while you do mundane
       | tasks like showering, cooking and cleaning.
        
       | dang wrote:
       | The submitted title ("Watching a video at 2x the speed can double
       | your learning speed") was editorialized in a way that strongly
       | affected the comments--it made the thread more shallow and
       | predictable. That's one reason the site guidelines ask you not to
       | do that.
       | 
       | " _Please use the original title, unless it is misleading or
       | linkbait; don 't editorialize._"
       | 
       | https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
       | 
       | Edit: it's worth pointing out that the submitted title at
       | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32815915 ("Marmots appear
       | not to age while they are hibernating") was actually good and in
       | keeping with the same guideline. In that case the original title
       | was linkbait and therefore needed to be changed, and the
       | submitted title appears to be an accurate and neutral
       | representation of the article, not a cherry-picked detail as it
       | was here.
        
       | lofaszvanitt wrote:
       | Don't speed up the video, cut the useless trash and stop wasting
       | ppls time. A general 300 page book has around 270 pages of
       | useless content.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2022-09-12 23:02 UTC)