[HN Gopher] Overview of the New LH2 Sphere at NASA Kennedy Space...
___________________________________________________________________
Overview of the New LH2 Sphere at NASA Kennedy Space Center [pdf]
Author : perihelions
Score : 30 points
Date : 2022-09-03 16:25 UTC (6 hours ago)
(HTM) web link (www.energy.gov)
(TXT) w3m dump (www.energy.gov)
| jeffrallen wrote:
| Here's a nice factoid from it:
|
| > circa 1970 Accidental production of first glass bubbles at 3M
| plant in Guin, AL
|
| > circa 1975 Cryogenic research testing by G. R. Cunnington and
| C. L. Tien at UC Berkeley
| avalys wrote:
| What's the cost per liter of this tank vs. the one built in the
| 1960s?
| gardenfelder wrote:
| All this heavy duty construction at KSC, which is ~10' above
| present sea level, but then, sea level is rising [1]
|
| [1]
| https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/features/NASASeaLevel/page...
| Vecr wrote:
| They can build earthworks, it's not too bad. It's similar to
| Manhattan Island for example, unless there's a catastrophic
| failure of planning and action, they can build a sea wall
| around it and put storm surge control devices in the rivers.
| jeffrallen wrote:
| Also: Methalox rockets are proving to be a better choice than
| hydrogen powered rockets, and while you could store methane in
| that tank, it's about the most expensive way possible to store
| methane per litre.
|
| More SLS brain damage.
| semi-extrinsic wrote:
| Methalox can be a better choice _if you are designing a
| reusable launch system and you are optimizing for low cost to
| orbit_.
|
| SLS is planned as an expendable launch system that will put
| spacecraft far beyond Earth orbit. They need the specific
| impulse that hydrogen offers.
|
| And in related news, liquid hydrogen is going to become just
| as mainstream as LNG is today, within a decade from now. All
| the major LNG ship builders (KHI, GTT etc.) are building and
| testing LH2 transport ships as we speak. Suiso Frontier began
| operational sailing more than a year ago.
| dotnet00 wrote:
| Methalox ends up being preferable because Hydrogen ends up
| performing relatively similarly when accounting for the
| extra tank mass needed to effectively contain it (both in
| terms of thicker walls and larger tanks in general).
| Methalox can't achieve Hydrogen ISPs but in exchange it's
| much easier to contain, allowing for much lighter and
| simpler tanks, resulting in similar deltaV overall.
|
| On top of that cryo methane and oxygen are at closer
| temperatures than hydrogen and oxygen, which simplifies
| storage further.
|
| So effectively the difference is that Hydrogen embrittles
| everything and makes development more expensive even
| without reuse considerations, making Methane superior
| unless you're SLS and being wasteful is a feature.
| modeless wrote:
| Low cost to orbit is the whole ball game. If you have that,
| everything else is dramatically easier. Not optimizing for
| that is, as the grandparent comment put it, brain damage.
| (AKA politics)
| jeffrallen wrote:
| The private space industry interprets brain damage as
| damage and routes around it.
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2022-09-03 23:00 UTC)