[HN Gopher] The rise of 'stealerships' and the shady economics o...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       The rise of 'stealerships' and the shady economics of car buying
        
       Author : senthil_rajasek
       Score  : 63 points
       Date   : 2022-08-30 13:19 UTC (2 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.npr.org)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.npr.org)
        
       | germinalphrase wrote:
       | Craigslist. Facebook marketplace. Where else do people look for
       | used car listings?
        
       | everdrive wrote:
       | I've been buying cars second-hand from private parties for my
       | last three cars. It's been a great experience. Everyone's been
       | honest so far, and I've never had unreasonable problems with any
       | of the cars.
       | 
       | I'm not sure I'd ever go to a dealership again. They make things
       | so painful, and wring as much money and stress out of you as
       | possible. There seems to be zero benefit for the consumer.
        
         | toomanyrichies wrote:
         | I anticipate moving to Los Angeles within the next 12 months
         | and am absolutely dreading the inevitability of needing to buy
         | a car. I haven't needed a car since 2007 since I've lived in a
         | series of major cities with excellent train/bus/subway systems.
         | Every single day, I've said a silent prayer of thanks that I
         | haven't had to pay for gas or insurance / sit in traffic / deal
         | with road rage (mine or that of others) / worry about someone
         | keying my car or stealing my catalytic converter.
         | 
         | Reading the comments here about peoples' experiences at
         | dealerships, I kept thinking "Do I really need to move to LA?
         | Is there any other way I can accomplish my goals?" I'm glad to
         | see you've had success dealing with private parties. This is
         | absolutely the way I will go when it comes time for me to bite
         | the bullet and buy a car.
        
           | gamblor956 wrote:
           | Depending on where you live in LA, and your interests, you
           | may not need a car. LA's public rail system can get you to
           | Downtown, Pasadena, Long Beach, Inglewood, Redondo/Manhattan
           | Beach, Santa Monica, Culver City, and Hollywood/Universal
           | City. The bus system can get you to 95% of the county. The
           | commuter rail system can get you out to Ventura, San
           | Bernardino, Riverside, and Orange County.
           | 
           | I know a number of NYC and Chicago transplants who moved to
           | LA without cars and get along fine. Pre-COVID I commuted to
           | work by rail for several years, and occasionally take the
           | rail to work now.
        
           | mxuribe wrote:
           | Well, LA has some nice weather...Have you considered maybe
           | looking into a three-wheeler like a Can Am Spyder
           | [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Can-Am_motorcycles]? (As
           | someone who is a big fan of motorcycles, I used to recommend
           | folks to consider the wonderful life of 2 wheels, but i
           | understand not everyone would be into it...plus LA traffic
           | might make conventional motorcycles risky for new riders.) Of
           | course, I'm assuming that an alternative like that a three-
           | wheeler might be cheaper, or more obtainable (either new or
           | used). Then again, if your job is not far from where you will
           | live, could a bicycle fit the need - either electric or
           | conventional?
        
           | kylehotchkiss wrote:
           | Buy the car before you move. Southern California dealers are
           | greedy.
           | 
           | You'll probably have to pay the difference between sales tax
           | in your current state and CA tax when you register it in CA
           | though.
        
           | defterGoose wrote:
           | LA has one of the best (if not _the_ best) used car markets
           | in the world. Prices are admittedly high for any vehicle
           | right now, but if you do your research and are ready to jump
           | when things pop up on CL, you can never overpay for a car
           | again here.
        
         | 14 wrote:
         | The only benefit to the consumer is you can go to a location
         | and see several different car models at the same place. If
         | buying used you need to go to some person's house at a time
         | that works for the seller and then hope the car is insured and
         | if a big purchase price hope that they are not currently
         | driving it so that you can take it to your mechanic to have it
         | checked out. But other then that the dealerships have no
         | benefits in my opinion. The multi point inspections they do are
         | basically a joke. The person doing it is some 10 month
         | mechanical school graduate tasked with the jobs that don't make
         | the company any money but that they are forced to do like
         | warranty work and inspections. You would be much better off
         | taking it to a mechanic that knows what he is doing and is
         | being paid by you to find issues. I am very thankful I am a
         | backyard mechanic and can buy used with much more confidence
         | then the average buyer. I can also buy cars with known issues
         | and fix them. The last time I was at a dealership was with a
         | friend and she was so set on a used car from them. I tried to
         | convince her to buy elsewhere but she just had to have it that
         | day. As you can guess they knew this and took advantage of it.
        
         | jandrese wrote:
         | My last two car purchases were off of Craigslist. So far they
         | have both been good. But I did have to walk away from a few bum
         | deals to get those cars. That said, the last time I tried to
         | use a dealership they weren't exactly honest[1] so it's just
         | part of the process of buying a used car.
         | 
         | [1] They insisted the car was in perfect shape and passed their
         | 87 point inspection even though it was listed as totaled due to
         | flood damage when I ran the Carfax. Plus it had this weird
         | thing where it was listed as garaged in New York but titled in
         | Florida and it seemed like nothing on the report matched up.
         | That and the VIN was obscured by the black goop they used to
         | glue the windshield on when someone replaced it, I had to use
         | the VIN from the door. This was back around 2006-2007, so maybe
         | the situation has improved, but I kind of doubt it.
        
         | tehwebguy wrote:
         | This is the way!
         | 
         | When buying used from a private seller you really can find
         | almost anything you want at a substantial discount if your
         | timeline is not urgent.
        
         | Ekaros wrote:
         | Here I think it makes sense for newish cars. Just check that
         | there is some warranty left and it has full service history.
         | 
         | I would personally avoid private for cheap cars or those that
         | transact often. As you might end up dealing with "jobbers" that
         | is unofficial resellers.
        
           | BeetleB wrote:
           | On the contrary, I only buy older used cars - the savings on
           | a car with some warranty isn't near as much. I've always had
           | good luck with merely taking a car I'm considering to a
           | mechanic to get it checked out. One day the luck will run
           | out, but whatever that will cost will come nowhere near the
           | amount I've saved over the years.
        
           | jandrese wrote:
           | The term I learned was "curbstoners". Learning how to spot
           | them is important when buying off of Craigslist or the like.
        
       | cycomanic wrote:
       | During my studies when I was overseas we had a seminar on how to
       | buy a car in NZ. The guy was absolutely awesome, he told us about
       | a lot of the tricks employed by dealers from subtle things like
       | mirrors where you are supposed to park the car (you see yourself
       | in the mirror) to things like working you with two people (it's
       | much harder to resist 2 people arguing with you, also why you
       | should never go by yourself). He also gave some good tips: go at
       | certain days of the month when they are about to get new stock
       | in, try to find the underperforming salesperson (they get away
       | with worse deals, because the others feel sorry for them), give
       | the impression you are planning to buy for much less than you
       | really want, because they always try to get you over your budget.
       | 
       | I managed to use those tricks when I bought my first car. Managed
       | to get it at about 40% of the sticker price (used car). Haven't
       | been as successful since though.
        
       | fleddr wrote:
       | This is why when you buy a car, you go in with a person that
       | knows cars. Or consult them whilst you browse online.
       | 
       | Be frugal with options/extras. Don't show excitement. If you're
       | poor at negotiating, try the brute force approach of an exit.
       | Doesn't matter what the offer is, just laugh, mumble something,
       | and exit the venue. They'll normally stop you. Don't bite at the
       | second offer either, they were already taking that into account.
       | Hassle some more.
       | 
       | This assumes a market where the seller has a very strong
       | incentive to sell, so not when there's lots of buyers.
       | 
       | Have bullet proof facts ready, like prices for the same car
       | elsewhere. In short, come prepared.
        
       | chrisseaton wrote:
       | Why engage in a back-and-forth with these people? Configure the
       | car you want on the manufacturer website, note the list price,
       | then send the configuration you want to a few dealers in your
       | area and ask them to quote for delivering you that car. Accept
       | the best quote. If they want to debate you about it, ask them to
       | either quote you or forget it. There are even apps which enforce
       | this - they get to quote you but can't communicate otherwise.
        
         | criddell wrote:
         | I did this in 2017 and none of the dealers I contacted would
         | play ball. Every one of them told me I would need to come in.
         | When I went in, they couldn't tell me the final price until
         | they knew if I would buy a service contract, if I would be
         | financing through them and if so, what my credit score was,
         | etc...
         | 
         | I ended up leaving with the car I wanted and paid about $500
         | more than I wanted to but they wore me down.
         | 
         | I think if you buy through Costco you can avoid some of the
         | bullshit, but you do pay more than you probably have to. It
         | might be worth it though just to have an easier experience.
        
           | groby_b wrote:
           | The words "Meh, if you can't do this, I'm probably fine with
           | a used one. CarMax doesn't haggle. Can you make a quote, or
           | am I leaving" usually get them to move.
           | 
           | Right now, some might balk. But you know what? That
           | salesperson cares about their quota, and if your purchases
           | pushes them over today's goal number, they twitch. Because
           | the inevitable next buyer tomorrow isn't going to get them
           | over the quota they need to meet today.
           | 
           | And if your dealership really plays hardball? Move on to the
           | next one. Or buy used from a place that doesn't haggle.
           | 
           | The way to lose this is if you want a specific
           | year/make/model - they'll get you. If your entire attitude is
           | "anything within that set of parameters", it's much harder
           | for them.
        
           | crazygringo wrote:
           | Seriously. If they have a glut of the model they can't sell
           | enough of then they'll probably play along -- but otherwise
           | they know you know what you're doing and they'll make very
           | little money on you, and they'd prefer to make more money
           | with somebody else. They're maximizing profit, not number of
           | cars sold, and for many cars it's supply that is the limiting
           | factor, not demand.
        
             | [deleted]
        
             | techsupporter wrote:
             | > but otherwise they know you know what you're doing and
             | they'll make very little money on you
             | 
             | This has the air of "That One Weird Trick" that used to
             | work in the early 2010s before everyone had heard of it.
             | But now that it's the lead paragraph in every single "how
             | to buy the exact car you want, for so much less money"
             | blogspam, of course it no longer works.
             | 
             | I'm not sure why people expected it to continue when the
             | entire business model of car dealerships is to turn suckers
             | into money.
             | 
             | "Having to interact with a dealership" is around number 4
             | or 5 on my list of why I will never buy a car again, after
             | years of not having one.
        
               | chrisseaton wrote:
               | I don't mind a market price - that's actually what I'm
               | seeking they can quote me as much as they think they'll
               | get from the people who haggle - I just want to avoid the
               | haggle.
        
           | qzw wrote:
           | Costco seems to have suspended their car buying program. I
           | tried to use it a few months ago and couldn't even get
           | started. Probably no dealers near me are even participating
           | in the program in such a seller's market.
        
           | supernovae wrote:
           | I purchased my Jeep Wrangler in 2018. I found the color I
           | wanted Online. Pre-qualified with my bank. Contacted the
           | internet sales address, told them I wanted the car and I'd be
           | by at 6 to pick it up and they had it ready.
           | 
           | My best car buying experience has been Tesla though. Ordered
           | on the app. Put 500 down. Got a build date. Got a
           | notification when it was in delivery. Added my payment info.
           | Got a time to pickup car. Drove home.
        
         | pkrotich wrote:
         | I did exactly what you mentioned - many didn't play ball but
         | one made an appointment with confirmed inventory. Drove 2 hours
         | only to be told car I wanted "just" sold and by the way we add
         | $10k to MSRP - classic bait and switch.
        
         | pwinnski wrote:
         | That's a great approach, and when there's a glut of cars
         | sitting on dealer lots, you might even get responses. Right
         | now, when most cars are selling for more than sticker, you
         | won't. If you don't buy a car, that's fine, there are others
         | who will.
        
           | chrisseaton wrote:
           | You'll get responses, just with quote that's higher - and
           | that fine it's a market.
        
           | aliqot wrote:
           | This has a finite window of viability.
        
             | qzw wrote:
             | Of course, and I really look forward to the eventual auto
             | dealer winter, but if you actually need a car right now
             | it's a serious pain in the ass.
        
               | aliqot wrote:
               | I empathize, I hope it works out for you.
        
               | qzw wrote:
               | I appreciate it, but it's actually not bad for me
               | personally. My wife wants a new car rather than need one.
               | We can afford to wait but can also afford to buy now, and
               | I wanted her to be happy. But I know many others are
               | definitely not so fortunate.
        
           | toss1 wrote:
           | Yup, last time, I just started looking for a particular few
           | cars, got by parameters down (desired trim levels, cost
           | limits, etc.) and emailed requesting quotes. Most wouldn't
           | play, but I found one who was just "yup, this is what we've
           | got, this is how we can configure it... cost is $xyz". After
           | a few rounds of email, maybe a couple tel calls, I had a
           | deal, went there for the first time to pick it up. When my
           | wife needed a new car in the next year or two, guess who we
           | called first? Same no-hassle deal.
           | 
           | It's a bit of a drive to get there in the adjacent state, but
           | totally worth it.
           | 
           | Edit: Also, we made deals for vehicles they had in stock, not
           | custom-configured from mfgr.
        
           | andrewmcwatters wrote:
           | People said this at the height of the used car shortage. It
           | still wasn't true. In my experience, suckers were buying
           | Corollas at 25%+(!) over MSRP. All I had to do was go to
           | another dealership.
           | 
           | Let me put it this way: you've got the entire continental US
           | you can buy a car from and shipping a vehicle coast-to-coast
           | usually costs under $2,000.
           | 
           | So, what do you think is truer? Is the market excruciatingly
           | tight, or are there just a lot of people making bad purchases
           | out there?
        
             | jancsika wrote:
             | > So, what do you think is truer? Is the market
             | excruciatingly tight, or are there just a lot of people
             | making bad purchases out there?
             | 
             | At least for the Prius Prime someone wrote a script to grab
             | the data which you can peruse[1].
             | 
             | E.g., for 6/30/22 there were 113 LEs, 99 XLEs, and 18
             | Limiteds that weren't listed as presold on that
             | spreadsheet.
             | 
             | I spot checked both by enumerating through Toyota's list of
             | dealerships and emailing roughly 50 dealerships. Based on
             | the response I'd say even in July only 10% of those numbers
             | were actually available. And cut that in half once I let
             | them know I was inquiring out of state.
             | 
             | Average markup _over_ MSRP was probably 5k. (Outlier was
             | 20k  "market adjustment" :)
             | 
             | So regardless of whether people are making bad purchases,
             | the market is exceedingly tight.
             | 
             | https://www.reddit.com/r/PriusPrime/comments/vcajy9/2022_pr
             | i...
        
         | tehwebguy wrote:
         | Make sure to triple check the paperwork at the end, someone
         | went viral yesterday for accidentally paying $6k over what they
         | believed they were for their Toyota Corolla.
        
           | pc86 wrote:
           | You really have to _try_ not to read what you 're signing for
           | something like that to happen. My fiance bought a car less
           | than a year ago and the final loan price was everywhere, even
           | highlighted. I've bought cars in two other states and it was
           | never exactly hidden.
        
         | analyst74 wrote:
         | I also had the experience where I placed an order on ford
         | website, routed it to a dealer who agreed to honor the online
         | price. 5 months later, when the car was delivered onto the
         | dealer lot, they wanted 10k more.
        
           | bombcar wrote:
           | Be sure to report that to Ford; they're not happy with that
           | happening.
        
             | qzw wrote:
             | Until they put some teeth into their "unhappiness", forgive
             | me for taking it as merely low effort PR noise. For $10k
             | per car (or 30-50k on some models like the F-150
             | Lightning), a dealer would be willing to incur all kinds of
             | unhappiness. But if those allocations actually start
             | getting cut off, they'll fall in line real fast. But Ford
             | wouldn't do that because the average dealer is far more
             | important to them than the average customer.
        
               | bombcar wrote:
               | Just copy your local media station, nightly news loves
               | running muck-raking things about stealerships.
        
               | qzw wrote:
               | Dealerships run a lot of ads during my nightly local
               | news, just saying. And if all the dealers are doing the
               | same thing, it then becomes a non-story.
        
           | kube-system wrote:
           | Did you have it in writing? I would have politely reminded
           | them that my state's consumer protection laws require them to
           | honor it.
        
         | awad wrote:
         | Interesting - do you have the names of any of those apps?
        
           | chrisseaton wrote:
           | In the UK there is Carwow. You may not like the prices you
           | get these days, but it's a market, and at least it's a take-
           | it-or-leave-it price.
        
           | qzw wrote:
           | TrueCar used to be a pretty good one, and was the service
           | behind Sam's Club and USAA's auto buying programs. But it's
           | pretty much no longer worth the bother now. Don't know of
           | anything newer that's better. Keep in mind that no app can
           | work miracles in a crazy market. They all ultimately depend
           | on dealers competing with each other to deliver any value,
           | but dealers just haven't needed to compete in the last couple
           | of years.
        
         | qzw wrote:
         | That's how it used to work (and still does for some less in
         | demand/in short supply models), but if you're after something
         | that's even moderately popular (most SUVs and EVs), you'll
         | hardly see any replies nowadays. That was the case when trying
         | to get my wife a new crossover recently. We ended up placing an
         | order in person with a dealer that "only" charged MSRP without
         | a bunch of crazy add-ons, albeit with an additional dealer fee
         | (pure profit) of $800. But when the car showed up 3 months
         | later it was missing power seats due to a supply shortage. We
         | walked from the deal and are now shopping again. Fun times.
        
         | fhrow4484 wrote:
         | Just like mortgage brokers are obligated to send you an
         | official, standardized "loan estimate" when you ask about a
         | mortgage, dealership should have something similar with cars.
         | 
         | Specifically: the car is only the first part, then there's
         | extra warranties from dealership, financing, etc.
         | 
         | A standardized quote that gives you the price of these optional
         | items would go a long way in making the experience smooth.
         | 
         | Private companies can solve the issues themselves (Carvana),
         | but that's coming at a significant $ premium so far.
         | 
         | The FTC rule mentioned in the article mentions this:
         | 
         | > Require full upfront disclosure of costs and conditions: The
         | proposal would require dealers to make key disclosures to
         | consumers, including providing a true "offering price" for a
         | vehicle that would be full price a consumer would pay,
         | excluding only taxes and government fees. It would also require
         | dealers to make disclosures about optional add-on fees,
         | including their price and the fact that they are not required
         | as a condition of purchasing or leasing the vehicle, along with
         | disclosures to consumers with key information about financing
         | terms.
        
           | sidewndr46 wrote:
           | If we're talking about the US, why layer on even more
           | regulation to an already unnecessary industry? Just eliminate
           | the dealership model & allow people to order directly from
           | the manufacturer.
        
           | LatteLazy wrote:
           | In the UK, you have 28 days to change your mind and arrange
           | your own financing. So for informed buyers, a common tactic
           | is to agree to whatever shitty high interest loan they're
           | selling to keep the sticker price down, then just call the
           | loan company and cancel and pay it off with cash from the
           | loan/savings you actually want to use.
        
             | kube-system wrote:
             | The same can be done in the US -- just pay it off before it
             | accrues any interest.
        
               | MerelyMortal wrote:
               | Just make sure there's no prepayment fees.
        
       | jeffwask wrote:
       | I know Carvana has issues but this is why I love using it. I have
       | bought and sold without all the slime of entering a dealership
        
         | creaghpatr wrote:
         | I had a wild experience on Carvana. Bought the car (used, with
         | 14k miles), they were going to ship it to my local Carvana
         | pickup and the day before I get a message to effect of, "Hey we
         | just tried to start your car and it's not starting so we don't
         | recommend you buy this car" . All fees refunded, I was confused
         | but grateful, no one followed up to try and get me to buy
         | another car (other than garden variety email list marketing).
         | Ended up buying a friend of a friends old car for way less two
         | weeks later.
        
           | qzw wrote:
           | They may have sold your car for more money to another buyer
           | locally.
        
             | bombcar wrote:
             | This is exactly what happened. Or some employee decided
             | they wanted it themselves.
             | 
             | If you still had the VIN you could probably search what
             | happened, heh.
        
         | kube-system wrote:
         | I don't personally understand the appeal. While some
         | dealerships are certainly sketchy, I've found high-volume
         | traditional dealerships to be pretty straightforward. They
         | price them to sell, you pay the price that's posted on the
         | sticker/website.
        
           | oangemangut wrote:
           | for me it's the archaic 'sales practices' they go through.
           | The bait and switching in advertising, the us vs them dynamic
           | they try to create with the sale managers, finalizing a price
           | with sales and then having finance try to wring more out of
           | you, or saying the price isn't possible unless x y z. I'll
           | never go through that again.
        
             | kube-system wrote:
             | I've never had an issue with an a dealer honoring an ad. I
             | always print it out and bring it with me. It's pretty
             | illegal if they don't.
             | 
             | Financing is financing. It's not the car. If you show up
             | without knowing how you're going to pay for the car,
             | well... you showed up without knowing how you're going to
             | pay for the car.
             | 
             | Yeah, they'll ask about extended warranties and such, but
             | it's just a matter of saying "no" a couple of times while
             | signing paperwork.
        
         | lastofthemojito wrote:
         | I know some people have had good experiences with Carvana
         | (especially when they already know what they want, and said car
         | that is configured just-so is halfway across the country) - but
         | I hate the idea of online shopping for the test-drive phase of
         | car shopping. Seeing a panoramic view of the car's interior
         | isn't enough, I need to feel it.
         | 
         | "Oh, don't worry, Carvana has a 7-day money back guarantee" -
         | yeah, I don't want to have to unwind a major transaction just
         | to test-drive a car. Especially if I'm trading in a car as part
         | of the transaction - from what I've read if you trade in a car
         | to Carvana and then decide to return the car you've purchased,
         | they don't bring your old car back.
         | 
         | I wish there was a service where you could give them say a
         | hundred bucks and they'd deliver maybe your top 5 cars to your
         | house to poke around and test drive. The Zappos experience
         | (they encourage people to order multiple sizes to try on and
         | make the returns easy) but for cars instead of shoes.
        
           | jeffwask wrote:
           | Oh... I used dealerships for the test drives. I had a price
           | from Carvana on each of the models I wanted to try and I went
           | around and tried them. Once, I landed on make and model. I
           | gave the sales guy a chance to beat the Carvana price he
           | didn't.
        
             | jeffwask wrote:
             | Additionally, if the old car is paid off and you don't need
             | it for down payment you could hold on to it for the break
             | in period where you can return the purchased car then just
             | sell the old one on Carvana and they will just come pick it
             | up.
        
           | culturestate wrote:
           | _> I wish there was a service where you could give them say a
           | hundred bucks and they 'd deliver maybe your top 5 cars to
           | your house to poke around and test drive._
           | 
           | Trying to imagine the logistics of getting this done -
           | profitably - within a Carvana-like model for anything _close_
           | to $100 just broke my brain.
        
             | bombcar wrote:
             | Hertz has (or used to have) a "rent to own" deal with cars.
             | 
             | You go to their lot of used cars, you poke and prod them,
             | then you rent one you think you'll like for a week for a
             | couple bills.
             | 
             | If you decide to keep it, the rental cost is put against
             | the purchase and you keep the car, if you don't like it you
             | return and try again.
        
               | kylehotchkiss wrote:
               | The problem with buying from Hertz or any rental car
               | dealership is that many people (myself included) take
               | rental cars on the highway and immediately press the
               | pedal to the floor to see what it can do (or how loud it
               | gets). People have zero incentive to drive rental cars
               | nicely and Hertz has no incentive than to do the bare
               | minimum of maintenance to keep the car on the road.
               | They're gonna wear out faster than a privately owned car.
               | 
               | See Jeremy Clarkson of former Top Gear glory describe it:
               | https://youtu.be/NYt9DO5WXr8?t=65
        
               | toomanyrichies wrote:
               | Is this what you're referring to?
               | 
               | https://www.hertzcarsales.com/rent2buy.htm
        
               | bombcar wrote:
               | Yep, that's the one! Seems it's 3 days now, or 2 hours
               | free.
               | 
               | Not all locations offered it, however, but it can be
               | nice.
               | 
               | Even if you don't use it, renting the car or type of car
               | you're thinking of buying can be a good strategy.
        
               | ghaff wrote:
               | They'll tend to be low-end trim models but a lot of what
               | you're evaluating in a test drive isn't how the heated
               | seats work. I informally did that before my recent
               | purchase but mostly in terms of what I didn't what to
               | buy. One vehicle I knew I didn't care much for. And
               | another, which was the same as I owned, I got hadn't
               | really improved in 11 years, infotainment unit
               | notwithstanding.
        
             | lastofthemojito wrote:
             | I live fairly close to the cluster of car dealerships in my
             | area so maybe my perception is skewed, but it doesn't seem
             | crazy to me that 2 sales guys from the Honda dealer would
             | drive 5 minutes to my house to drop off an Accord (and then
             | go back in 1 car), 2 sales guys from the Toyota dealer
             | would drive 5 minutes to my house to drop off a Camry,
             | etc... Seems like they're constantly making little trips to
             | pick up cars from satellite lots, drop off cars for
             | maintenance, fuel up cars, etc.
             | 
             | This might only work for dealerships within a certain
             | distance of course.
             | 
             | But right, the part about doing it profitably would
             | probably require a dealership that gets a successful sales
             | lead to pay a fee to such a service.
        
           | CamperBob2 wrote:
           | _I wish there was a service where you could give them say a
           | hundred bucks and they 'd deliver maybe your top 5 cars to
           | your house to poke around and test drive. The Zappos
           | experience (they encourage people to order multiple sizes to
           | try on and make the returns easy) but for cars instead of
           | shoes._
           | 
           | I think a lot of people end up using Turo for evaluation
           | purposes. I'm a little surprised that no one has attempted to
           | disintermediate/democratize car sales as well as rentals. If
           | I had the option to buy the car I rent on Turo, that would
           | scratch the itch you're referring to, wouldn't it... at least
           | for the used market?
        
             | lastofthemojito wrote:
             | That's not a bad idea. I've used lensrentals.com to rent
             | camera gear before, and they generally also have a price to
             | keep the particular item you're renting:
             | https://www.lensrentals.com/keeper
             | 
             | That'd be a neat option on Turo - "ok, I'm looking at
             | buying a Jeep - I want to test-drive one to validate this
             | desire, but ideally one I could buy if I fall in love
             | with".
        
         | simonebrunozzi wrote:
         | Which issues have you experienced, or know about?
        
           | Kon-Peki wrote:
           | Here's one(two?)
           | 
           | https://www.autoblog.com/2022/07/20/carvana-illinois-
           | license...
           | 
           | PS - they've been reinstated again. Maybe.
        
           | jeffwask wrote:
           | https://seekingalpha.com/instablog/767332-clastic/5659699-ca.
           | ..
        
         | tehwebguy wrote:
         | Wish they would stop clogging all the local Craigslist boards
         | but at least they correctly mark them as "by dealer," making
         | them easy to filter out
        
       | roberthahn wrote:
       | I purchased my current vehicle through an auto broker - for a
       | fee, a description of the model/trim level, and the name of the
       | dealership I want to pick the car up at (anywhere in Canada),
       | they would negotiate on my behalf. Once they have a final price I
       | sign off on it, and would be told the date to pick it up and make
       | payment.
       | 
       | It was a stress-free experience and I would definitely recommend
       | you look into that if you really hate the idea of buying a car.
        
         | jandrese wrote:
         | I feel like car buying can always be relatively low stress if
         | you're willing to just pay the sticker price. It's the haggling
         | that sucks. But that means paying more for the car than you
         | really need to.
         | 
         | Some dealerships offer no-haggle pricing around here. Their
         | sticker price is typically slightly lower than comparable cars
         | in other dealerships, but people spend on average more for
         | every car purchased at them, I think it amounted to around a
         | thousand dollars or so. But that study was also from over a
         | decade ago.
        
       | Cupertino95014 wrote:
       | Who goes to a dealership to buy a car anymore? In 1991 I bought
       | my Miata online (I think. Maybe it was over the phone), and they
       | delivered it to a dealer near me, where I just picked it up.
       | Alternatives to dealers have been around forever.
        
         | sidewndr46 wrote:
         | Was this before or after Al Gore invented the internet?
        
         | encryptluks2 wrote:
         | People that can't wait 6+ months for a new car.
        
         | guywithahat wrote:
         | Well you just bought from a dealership, and what's more is that
         | dealership was under no real obligation to sell to you. They
         | could have accepted the car from Mazda and sold it to someone
         | else.
         | 
         | The issue this article really looks into is that we invited
         | government into auto sales for some reason who required
         | dealerships (among other things) be mandatory and independent,
         | so when Ford released the Bronco or Maverick and they turned
         | out to be popular, Ford might say "this Maverick is worth 25k"
         | and then the dealership would mark it up to 40k and there was
         | nothing the buyer could do about it, even if you ordered from
         | Ford. Dealerships would accept your vehicle, say you need to
         | pay an additional 10k, and if you don't they won't let you
         | leave with the car
        
           | Cupertino95014 wrote:
           | Yeah, but that didn't happen. Those were normal times. These
           | are not. Do you have some evidence that it does, nowadays?
           | 
           | I've heard of it happening with an electric car, but those
           | are in such insane demand that normal rules don't apply.
        
       | jeffbee wrote:
       | Why do people get all worked up over a difference +- a few
       | hundred dollars on a very expensive purchase? When I want to buy
       | a car, which I admit rarely happens, I look at the advertised
       | price and if I'm willing to pay that price then I call the dealer
       | and if I'm not, I don't. If the paperwork shows up with a
       | different number on it then I tell them to leave, and it's their
       | time, not mine, that was wasted.
       | 
       | I just really don't get the whole haggling thing. If you want a
       | lower price, wait until one is being advertised, or substitute a
       | different model, or get a bicycle.
        
         | jwilber wrote:
         | It sounds like you don't purchase cars much if you think the
         | price difference is only a few hundred dollars.
         | 
         | I went to look for a car recently and, ignoring the Covid
         | shortage fee increase, they added a mandatory $1200 for some bs
         | paint protection and an additional $1400 for some gps anti-
         | theft that would, "pay for itself with insurance savings"
         | (lol).
         | 
         | That's an additional $2600 on every car ignoring all the other
         | bs they try to sneak in.
         | 
         | Here's something fun: go look up the reviews for all
         | dealerships nearby and read for yourself how many talk about
         | price bait-and-switches, mandatory fees, etc.
        
         | AnimalMuppet wrote:
         | I don't like being ripped off. I don't like it whether it's a
         | mugger, or a car dealership, or a bank.
         | 
         | I also don't like being lied to. I don't like being told the
         | deal is X for $Y, and finding out later that it's X for $Y +
         | $Z. In fact, one of my major rules is that I don't do business
         | with people who lie to me.
        
         | gfdsgfdsf wrote:
         | ive gotten 8k off of MSRP from haggling. haggling via email is
         | very easy (this was in late 2020 before the car situation got
         | crazy though)
        
         | yamtaddle wrote:
         | There aren't a lot of other contexts in which I can effectively
         | make $500-2000 for being willing to talk to an annoying, but
         | harmless, person for an hour while saying "no" a lot.
        
         | defen wrote:
         | > Why do people get all worked up over a difference +- a few
         | hundred dollars on a very expensive purchase
         | 
         | The size of the purchase shouldn't affect how worked up you get
         | about a few hundred dollars of overcharge, only the regularity
         | with which you make the purchase. For example let's say you buy
         | a new TV and a new car every 5 years. Let's say the TV "should"
         | cost $500 and the car "should" cost $25,000. Why would you be
         | ok with paying $25,500 for the car but not with paying $1,000
         | for the TV (or, maybe you're ok with both?)
        
           | jeffbee wrote:
           | Yes, the difference absolutely does not matter. Most people
           | who own cars have experienced a big exogenous shock in
           | operating costs due to fuel recently, that would have more
           | than wiped out the average advantage from negotiating.
           | Furthermore, the unforeseeable supply shortage greatly
           | benefited existing car owners, again much more than any
           | reasonable amount of haggling could have done. And other
           | exogenous factors such as housing costs will have been far
           | more important to the lives of car purchasers than the
           | nominal prices of cars. I mean, have you ever tried to buy a
           | house? That shit is crazy.
           | 
           | The one and only way to save money on cars is to not buy
           | them. The true cost of car ownership is massively, woefully
           | underestimated by virtually all drivers. 1% or 2% difference
           | on the nominal purchase price amounts to nothing in the big
           | picture.
        
             | BeetleB wrote:
             | > Most people who own cars have experienced a big exogenous
             | shock in operating costs due to fuel recently, that would
             | have more than wiped out the average advantage from
             | negotiating.
             | 
             | This is a ... weird way to look at it.
             | 
             | The increase in fuel costs affects you roughly equally
             | whether you negotiated or not - so it's not at all a factor
             | in the decision making process (unless simply not owning a
             | car is an option). I mean, the price of goods went up a lot
             | too due to rising fuel costs, but we don't consider those
             | when buying a car, right?
             | 
             | > The one and only way to save money on cars is to not buy
             | them.
             | 
             | Ah, your reasoning makes sense now. Unfortunately, not
             | buying a car is not an option for many.
             | 
             | > 1% or 2% difference on the nominal purchase price amounts
             | to nothing in the big picture.
             | 
             | I would strongly recommend taking a course (or reading a
             | textbook) on engineering economics. Your way of thinking is
             | precisely what they caution against. If anything, the fact
             | that things have gotten quite expensive makes it more
             | important to cut costs where you can.
        
               | jeffbee wrote:
               | I might agree with your last sentence but not the rest of
               | it. Car owners systematically underestimate the total
               | cost of ownership by ~50% (i.e. the true cost is ~2x the
               | perceived cost). Under those conditions it is completely
               | bizarre that buyers agonize over 1-2% of the purchase
               | price. It would make sense to micromanage that purchase
               | price if, and only if, the rest of your expenses are
               | known and managed to very unusual accuracy.
               | 
               | https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-01118-w
        
               | BeetleB wrote:
               | > Car owners systematically underestimate the total cost
               | of ownership by ~50% (i.e. the true cost is ~2x the
               | perceived cost).
               | 
               | Fortunately, that's not me. I've been keeping all
               | financial records for all non-cash transactions for over
               | 15 years, and so I know exactly what I've spent on my car
               | - fuel, repairs, addons, everything. I've posted
               | breakdowns far down in my comment history (perhaps in the
               | last year - not sure).
               | 
               | What I can say: It's not even close to whatever Edmund's
               | TCO calculator reports - so I'm a bit wary of these
               | estimates. I'm not frugal, and I'm not a car guy, and I
               | do whatever the mechanic suggests.
        
           | ghaff wrote:
           | That's one of the many biases explored by behavioral
           | economics. People absolutely look at percentage premiums even
           | though it's the absolute numbers that "should" matter--issues
           | like fairness aside.
        
         | BeetleB wrote:
         | > Why do people get all worked up over a difference +- a few
         | hundred dollars on a very expensive purchase?
         | 
         | Because $500 lets you buy $500 worth of goods whether you are
         | spending $1000 or $30000.
         | 
         | Also, the difference can be a lot more than $500. I've known
         | people to save a few thousand dollars.
         | 
         | > I just really don't get the whole haggling thing. If you want
         | a lower price, wait until one is being advertised
         | 
         | I waited till too long to learn how to negotiate, and once I
         | started doing it, I understood why your strategy is quite
         | suboptimal. With dealers, it's simple: If you don't haggle, you
         | will always pay more. The price you can get with successful
         | haggling is often lower than the price will ever be advertised,
         | in any nearby dealership.
         | 
         | Also, while haggling seems like a pain, it can actually save
         | time. A friend was once buying a used BMW, and he wanted a
         | price a few thousand dollars less than the dealer was offering.
         | Just asking for that lower price didn't help. So he told the
         | dealer he had found a dealer with the price he was looking for,
         | but it was all the way in a nearby town and he would rather
         | just by it locally. The dealer then agreed.
         | 
         | There was no dealer in another town selling at that price. I
         | wondered why the local dealer didn't ask for proof. The likely
         | reason: It wasn't an _unreasonable_ price, and the local dealer
         | knew that if the buyer could afford to wait, he _will_ find a
         | dealer somewhere selling at that price. There was utility in
         | him getting rid of this car rather than wait for another buyer.
         | 
         | Haggling can save you a lot of time. The only reason I go to
         | private party for used car is you'll almost always get better
         | deals there. But I do pay a price: I have to wait a lot longer
         | on average.
        
         | matwood wrote:
         | I agree. It's why Carmax did well even pre-internet delivery
         | companies. Were they the cheapest? No, but the prices were
         | fine, you could shop online, and no one did any hard sales job.
        
           | bitsnbytes wrote:
           | I hate the dealership experience and games they play and have
           | always wanted to buy from carmax.
           | 
           | However , I have yet purchased a car from carmax, because
           | they have been typically over $3.5K+ overpriced , for the
           | same year ,model, and equivalent condition that I can get it
           | at the scummy dealers.
           | 
           | Typical car shopping experience. Now this has to be modified
           | a little depending if its a buyers or sellers market. However
           | for the most part
           | 
           | 1. Determine the car ,model,year, and condition of the car I
           | want.
           | 
           | 2. Browse carmax and set that as my highest price.
           | 
           | 3. Email and go to local dealers and offer $3.5K- below
           | carmax asking price than add tax and title to submit your
           | offer as and out the door price.
           | 
           | 4. Some don't responded but some do .
           | 
           | 5. Go to dealerships ones that said they can do it at near
           | the end of the month.
           | 
           | 6. Then expect for them to do the bait and switch and send
           | you to the backend manager who plays online games on his
           | laptop for about an hour pretending to do something when they
           | are really just trying to break you down. So when the manager
           | comes into play I typically say great just give me a call or
           | I come back after a couple of hours. so I don't wait there
           | for no reason.
           | 
           | 7. Manager plays the if he sold me the car for what I asked
           | then they would be out of business. Then I say why did you
           | agree to it and either I stay firm on my original offer or go
           | up 500 bucks. they typically still don't approve at this
           | stage which is expected and fine so I walk knowing they
           | already have my contact information.
           | 
           | 8. Play the wait game . Typically 1 or 2 weeks later I get a
           | call back. They Agree for my original counter offer.
           | 
           | 9. I go back in to sign the paperwork
           | 
           | 10. The carsalesman is all giddy and sends me back to the
           | manager and financier to close on the deal.
           | 
           | 11. I get back and I see additional charges such as dealer
           | fees and other bs which I say thank you but no thank you and
           | the offer I submitted was out the door price. Sometimes I
           | walk out again or they remove the charges .
           | 
           | fun stuff but like I said playing the stupid game has saved
           | me $3.5K most times. The key is willing and having the time
           | to play the stupid game with them, willing to walk, and not
           | have an immediate need for a car.
           | 
           | There have been also times where I have been less willing to
           | haggle on the price but even then I can typically get the car
           | 1.5K below car max with little effort. When I buy new its a
           | little trickier but I never pay anywhere near the msrp.
        
         | kube-system wrote:
         | The buying experience really varies depending on what end of
         | the market you're at. A high volume Honda dealer will almost
         | certainly have a very different buying experience than a low
         | volume corner buy-here-pay-here lot, and a different revenue
         | model. The former often _won 't_ haggle with you, and the
         | latter is trying to pay their bills via margin off a small
         | number of purchases by customers who don't have much ability to
         | shop around.
        
         | qw3rty01 wrote:
         | The article answered that question:
         | 
         | > I found some trucks that were literally priced
         | $10,000-$15,000 over MSRP, and I encountered many of the shady
         | business practices that the FTC is now trying to ban.
         | 
         | because it's not +- a few hundred dollars, it's thousands of
         | dollars, and claiming online that it's one price and charging a
         | lot more once you get there
        
           | jeffbee wrote:
           | Charging over MSRP for cars that are in high demand and short
           | supply is not "shady" or even slightly odd.
        
             | gfdsgfdsf wrote:
        
         | MBCook wrote:
         | It's not always a few hundred. On popular models it can be many
         | thousands.
        
       | RunSet wrote:
       | > To be fair to dealerships, they do provide important services.
       | They offer a distribution and service network, which is vital to
       | both manufacturers and car buyers.
       | 
       | Until they don't. Throwback to that time "the world's largest
       | Chevrolet dealer"[0] went under like Jacques Cousteau[1].
       | 
       | [0]
       | https://web.archive.org/web/20070202025849/http://www.billhe...
       | 
       | [1]
       | https://web.archive.org/web/20170901203212/http://www.tbo.co...
        
       | WalterBright wrote:
       | "And it's simply because there's high demand, low inventory, and
       | they can do it."
       | 
       | Supply & Demand. It's the law.
        
       | encryptluks2 wrote:
       | I find it strange that dealerships can be so scammy, and the
       | manufacturer acts like it has no impact on how people view their
       | brand.
        
         | kurupt213 wrote:
         | Subaru cares. They'll take away the cars
        
           | encryptluks2 wrote:
           | From the vehicle owner or dealership? I had the worst
           | experience with Toyota. I don't think I'd ever buy a Toyota
           | again. The manufacturer was like... We only make the cars and
           | don't care what happens at the dealership.
           | 
           | Also what is up with dealerships and mandatory arbitration
           | agreements? So you can't buy a car now without signing an
           | arbitration agreement?
        
         | kube-system wrote:
         | Manufacturers know it has an impact on their brand, but they're
         | legally compelled to put up with it.
        
         | dymk wrote:
         | > At least some automakers know this. Earlier this year,
         | Hyundai Motor Company sent a letter to its dealerships urging
         | them to end deceptive practices, such as advertising a low
         | price online and then charging a much higher price when
         | customers go into the store. The company complained that sky-
         | high markups were "damaging our brands' long-term ability to
         | capture new customers and retain loyal ones."
        
       | 650REDHAIR wrote:
       | Here's my Stealership experience:
       | 
       | I bought a car from Shift.com and it was an absolute nightmare.
       | 
       | Originally I had decided on a Tesla that was in Oakland and put
       | down my deposit. The rates Shift gave me were laughable so I
       | contacted my credit union. Shift put every roadblock up trying to
       | convince me to go with their financing and refinance at a later
       | date. I declined and shortly after my car was sold to someone
       | else. If I remember correctly it was within like 24hrs. They
       | apologized profusely and told me that it shouldn't have been
       | possible for that to happen, but it did.
       | 
       | I found another car in San Diego and put down another deposit. I
       | was contacted about shipping and told if I did it by a certain
       | time they would ship the next day. I did. It took something like
       | a week to arrive in Oakland and sat for a few days before they
       | could inspect and schedule a delivery.
       | 
       | The delivery was a parking spot on a major street with a rushed
       | employee. I mention that because I didn't notice anything major
       | with cars flying past me.
       | 
       | I immediately drive to a parking lot and start examining the car.
       | The trunk alignment seems off and there was no mention of damage
       | so I take some photographs. Maybe it happened in shipping? I take
       | it to a car wash because it was filthy. The trunk has a leak.
       | It's gross and musky in there.
       | 
       | Shift blew me off so I emailed their CEO, legal, PR, etc until
       | someone reached out to me. They paid for an inspection and I
       | choose the Toyota dealership. Dealership was shocked that the
       | damage wasn't spotted during Shift's initial inspection. There
       | was a huge hit in the rear and the repair work was subpar at
       | best. The body panel was leaking water and the advanced sensors
       | weren't working because the rear left one was broken. The initial
       | quote was ~$10k.
       | 
       | Shift was provided the report and after some time they scheduled
       | a pickup to have their team preform their own inspection.
       | 
       | Fast forward 8 weeks of very little communication I am informed
       | they have fixed the car. I pressed for more info and they said
       | they sent my car to a DETAILER. Not a mechanic. Not a body shop.
       | Their detailer said the Toyota dealership was wrong. No leak.
       | Sensors work.
       | 
       | Somehow they decided that my front bumper was the problem and
       | "painted it", or at least that's what Shift told me. Turns out
       | they lied about that too. Original paint that they buffed, but
       | left compound everywhere and fucked up my headlights and Toyota
       | badge.
       | 
       | When confronted with all of this, with photo evidence, Shift
       | offered me $250.
       | 
       | That's it. $250 after keeping my car for nearly 10 weeks and then
       | not fixing it. During the time they had it the avg MPG dropped to
       | 21 mpg (typically 40) and managed to break a bunch of fasteners
       | in the trunk.
       | 
       | Now my car has a major accident on the carfax and I'll be out at
       | least $10k to fix it. Fuck Shift.com
        
         | 10000truths wrote:
         | Sounds like it's time for small claims court?
        
           | 650REDHAIR wrote:
           | Yes, I'm filing next week.
           | 
           | I wanted to give them an opportunity to fix it.
        
       | akshayB wrote:
       | I recently went through a car buying process and it was extremely
       | brutal. You signup paying for Doc fee ($600), even gas, other
       | hidden fees, and outrageous charges. Another issue I noticed was
       | you are forced into buying overprized accessories like first aid
       | kit ($150), car mats and even cargo nets. After all this we ended
       | up buying from craigslist as to my surprise some of these charges
       | cannot be even waved, you don't stand a chance as people are
       | willing to pay for these things and dealership just move to next
       | customer.
        
         | kylehotchkiss wrote:
         | Is the doc fees just the DMV paperwork? That's always a fee
         | when you buy.
        
       | BeetleB wrote:
       | Every one I know hates car dealerships. Yet 90% of them refuse to
       | buy a used car from a private party.
       | 
       | While it's true they have a lobby and have twisted the arms of
       | legislators, it's also true that people prefer buying from them.
       | And when they don't buy from them, they buy from CarMax which,
       | for used cars, is even worse than buying from a dealer (pre-
       | pandemic).
       | 
       | What keeps people from buying from private parties?
       | 
       | Unwillingness to plan and save money (i.e. refuse to buy car
       | without financing). Even for under $10K
       | 
       | Being scared of getting a lemon because they lack knowledge about
       | cars. I too lack that knowledge, which is why I get a trusted
       | mechanic to check out any car I buy. Hasn't failed me in 20
       | years. Used car warranties are useless - they don't last long.
       | And the last time I went car shopping, _every_ used car from the
       | dealer that seemed like a good price had serious problems when I
       | took it to the mechanic. Never get a used car from a dealer if
       | they don 't let you take it to a mechanic.
       | 
       | Quicker process: It may take a while finding a good used car via
       | Private Party. OTOH, there are plenty of dealers one can walk
       | into. However, once you find a car you like, the process is much
       | smoother with private party. You either agree on a price or you
       | don't. No hidden fees. You know exactly what you're getting.
       | 
       |  _Edit_ : I just want to be clear: I'm not trying to convince
       | anyone to buy private party. If you're happy with avoiding the
       | "hassle", that's fine. My point is that for all the complaints
       | about dealers, the reality is people prefer them.
        
         | Retric wrote:
         | Don't forget about transaction costs.
         | 
         | IMO, buying an economic new car and then keeping for most of
         | the vehicles lifetime is close to optimal. No need to stress
         | about comparing a bunch of specific cars just a few models you
         | can research online. It's low stress because you have a lot of
         | leverage at the dealership as you can get the same thing down
         | the street or in 3 months if you chose to walk out the door.
        
           | BeetleB wrote:
           | > IMO, buying an economic new car and then keeping for most
           | of the vehicles lifetime is close to optimal.
           | 
           | It sounds like you're adding the time searching, etc to your
           | model (which is fine).
           | 
           | From a purely financial perspective, I do wonder. I think the
           | key phrase is "keeping it for most of the vehicle's
           | lifetime". If I look at the used cars I've bought, the total
           | I've paid is $17000 in today's dollars over the last 19
           | years.[1] If you throw in various repairs, it adds a few
           | thousand more (I'm too lazy to look up the actual numbers,
           | but you can find it if you dig deep in my comment history).
           | And that number includes routine maintenance everyone has to
           | do (oil changes, replace brakes, etc).
           | 
           | A comparable new car today would cost more, but you get the
           | benefit of having a modern car instead of old cars that I've
           | driven. The down side is you're stuck with that car for a
           | long time, whereas you can keep getting newer model used card
           | every so many years.
           | 
           | [1] I didn't get lucky or find fantastic deals. These numbers
           | are representative if you follow a few simple rules of used
           | car buying.
        
         | [deleted]
        
         | qzw wrote:
         | People don't have trusted mechanics or know how to get one. For
         | the majority of people, the dealer where they got the car is
         | their "(somewhat) trusted mechanic". That's why they go to
         | dealers or CarMax and pay a huge premium, just for the
         | psychological comfort. And for certain premium brands, a
         | certified preowned car that comes with an extended warranty
         | might not even be that bad of a deal, at least during normal
         | market conditions.
        
           | eikenberry wrote:
           | I buy at CarMax because... a) I hate bartering. b) I want to
           | visit a website, look at the cars available, go test drive a
           | few, buy the one I like best. IE. Convenience. My time is
           | worth the few thousand extra I pay that would be spent
           | tracking down private owners, driving around to all of them
           | to test drive, getting a mechanic to check it over, dealing
           | with all those people, etc.
        
             | BeetleB wrote:
             | > My time is worth the few thousand extra I pay that would
             | be spent tracking down private owners, driving around to
             | all of them to test drive, getting a mechanic to check it
             | over, dealing with all those people, etc.
             | 
             | This is a common refrain, and while you can afford it, I
             | doubt many people I know can really afford that cost of a
             | few thousand dollars. If I offered a $1500 fee for doing
             | the leg work for them, would they pay me the money? If not,
             | then "convenience of saving time" is not the reason.
        
               | qzw wrote:
               | The convenience is a factor for some, but perceived
               | safety is probably the primary factor for most. They may
               | not be able to afford to pay thousands extra, but they
               | can even less afford to be scammed or buy a lemon. So
               | they will compromise on the model or age or mileage of
               | the vehicle and get a little less car for their budget.
        
               | eikenberry wrote:
               | If there was a trustworthy service I could pay to buy me
               | a car that, with their fee, would cost around the same as
               | CarMax (or maybe even a bit more) I'd 100% try it. I love
               | the concierge type services and take advantage of them
               | whenever possible. There just aren't many of them to use.
        
           | BeetleB wrote:
           | I could talk to each of these points, but at the end of the
           | day, you're agreeing with me: As much as people complain
           | about it, they _prefer_ dealers, or options even more
           | expensive than dealers (e.g. CarMax) even if for very poor
           | reasons.
           | 
           | All the problems you list are not difficult to overcome when
           | it comes to private party. People do not want to overcome it
           | - they would rather pay a few thousand dollars more.
        
             | qzw wrote:
             | I don't disagree with you that serious money can be saved
             | if one knows the correct way to buy from a private party.
             | But psychological comfort also has real value for a lot of,
             | maybe even most, people. It may seem like a poor reason to
             | you, but for them it's worth it. Plus, you should be happy
             | to have fewer people competing with you to buy from private
             | sellers, thereby further lowering your price.
        
         | 121789 wrote:
         | It's a big purchase and risk and most people don't have a
         | trusted mechanic. You know you're getting a little scammed at
         | the dealership, but the risk of a complete lemon feels much
         | lower (and you have someone to complain to post-sale if things
         | don't go well). Interesting idea for a revenue stream for
         | mechanics though (used car assessments for a fee).
        
           | BeetleB wrote:
           | > You know you're getting a little scammed at the dealership,
           | but the risk of a complete lemon feels much lower (and you
           | have someone to complain to post-sale if things don't go
           | well).
           | 
           | But that's my point. It's only a _feeling_ , and likely not
           | reflective of reality. And in most cases, no: You have no one
           | to complain to. A lot of used cars have fairly low warranties
           | (a few months, maybe?). Most problems will not occur in that
           | short window.
        
         | [deleted]
        
       | dillutedfixer wrote:
       | Dealing with a dealership is all about psychology. They are
       | playing a psychological mind game with you when they make you
       | wait for so long while they're in the back doing "paperwork".
       | They want you to get antsy so you make bad decisions.
       | 
       | The trick to making this interaction go your way is to not play
       | their game. If they seat you at a table and make you wait, just
       | get up and walk away. Go start looking at another car. This will
       | freak them the F out. My last interaction with a car dealer was
       | hilarious. When I started playing mind games with them (walking
       | away while they made me wait, fake-scrolling through ads on my
       | phone, wondering out loud about the dealer across the street)
       | they literally bent over backwards. They lowered the price on the
       | car I wanted significantly. They offered me more than KBB trade-
       | in value for my old car. They even offered to buy my wife and I
       | lunch because we acted like we were going to go think it over
       | while we ate.
       | 
       | It's all mind games. Don't play theirs. The dealerships tactics
       | are not very effective if you take control. They just get a lot
       | of practice and they know that new-car-smell is addictive.
        
         | ISL wrote:
         | The only winning move with the manipulative is not to play.
         | Their games tend to waste your time and resources.
         | 
         | Somewhere, somebody interested in delivering customer value
         | will sell you a quality car at a price that is respectful to
         | all parties. Buy that one. Do note that a respectful price
         | preserves a margin for the dealer.
        
         | michaelwww wrote:
         | This is good advice. I discovered by accident a really good
         | technique. Just tell them you don't make any big decisions
         | without sleeping on it. Then don't budge. Once they know they
         | can't get you to sign that day, a lot of the tension goes out
         | of the process. They have to switch gears and be respectful to
         | entice you back tomorrow.
        
           | dillutedfixer wrote:
           | Anything that throws them off their very-well rehearsed
           | script puts the power back in your hands!
        
       | zachshefska wrote:
       | Disclaimer; I run a popular youtube channel educating consumers
       | on car buying.
       | 
       | Greg did a good job documenting the challenges of buying a car in
       | today's market. Fortunately, we are starting to see a softening
       | in consumer demand which has led to used car prices to begin to
       | drop in some areas and for certain types of vehicles.
       | 
       | We expect that as automakers increase production we'll go away
       | from markups. The timeline for that is tricky since Asian brands
       | (Toyota and Honda especially) are struggling MUCH more than
       | American automakers. MSRPs are rising fast too, so while dealer
       | markups may disappear as demand weakens and supply increases,
       | don't be surprised if you see MSRPs that are 5-10% higher year
       | over year.
       | 
       | Wait times right now for hybrid vehicles are over a year. The
       | push to PHEV and BEV will continue to be delayed due to
       | ridiculous prices. The average transaction price for a new EV
       | last month was north of $66,000. Not affordable.
       | 
       | Great insights in Greg's article. I wish we could have helped him
       | before he embarked on the journey.
        
         | sremani wrote:
         | Hey Zack, I was about to plug your channel. Good work bro!
        
         | germinalphrase wrote:
         | Are Japanese manufactures supply constrained due to chip
         | shortages in particular?
        
         | ghaff wrote:
         | The current supply shortages made the process less bothersome
         | for me in some ways because I didn't really expect to have much
         | luck haggling. Wasn't perfect. "In transit" meant it wasn't
         | built yet and I was in a bit of a hurry. (Had car but car had
         | problems.) Doc fee was high. A couple of 50% BS sets of
         | "factory installed options." (Though got price tacked onto my
         | pretty generous trade-in.) Some annoying attempts to upsell but
         | "no" worked fine. Didn't need financing.
         | 
         | But overall, it was a couple of visits and a few hours and I
         | got the vehicle (Honda) in six weeks.
        
       | twblalock wrote:
       | I hope the example of Tesla's successful direct sales model, and
       | Ford and GM's current frustration with dealers marking up popular
       | EVs, will result in the large auto companies lobbying to remove
       | the protectionist laws that force the dealership model on
       | consumers.
        
         | ISL wrote:
         | Unlikely -- Saturn had consumer-friendly no-hassle pricing (and
         | vehicles) in the 1990s. That model hasn't returned.
         | 
         | (Also, the superlative owners' manual for my wife's Saturn was
         | a user-friendly document designed with the end-user in mind.
         | Never seen anything like it before or since.)
        
       | pkrotich wrote:
       | I couldn't agree more with the author. It's my exact experience.
       | 
       | I'm in the market to get a car for my 16 year old daughter. Found
       | a car she wanted online, made an appointment (after they
       | confirmed the inventory with the dealership) - we drove 2 hours
       | only to be told the car we wanted just got moved to sister
       | dealership a few miles away... asked them if we could go see or
       | buy it only to be told it sold (after a minute of "checking") and
       | by the way all cars are marked $10k above MSRP in the name of
       | market adjustment!
       | 
       | I guess technically it's not false advertising since the
       | advertised car we wanted "sold". What infuriated me is not even
       | time wasted - with confirmation I started financing process!! Now
       | I have an inquiry on my credit report for nothing.
       | 
       | It's such an outdated sales model based on trickery and I hope
       | dealerships go by way of malls in my lifetime!
        
         | matttb wrote:
         | > I guess technically it's not false advertising since the
         | advertised car we wanted "sold".
         | 
         | I worked at a car dealership and they absolutely lied about
         | this stuff. They would say that the law lets them do it as long
         | as it was sold within 24 hours, but they also kept advertising
         | cars that had been sold weeks ago. Every time someone came in
         | and asked they'd give the "Sorry it was sold within the past 24
         | hours" lie.
        
       | kurupt213 wrote:
       | Subaru dealerships are supposed to stick to MSRP. They got a
       | nasty gram from corporate at the beginning of the year during the
       | big supply crunch
        
         | gamblor956 wrote:
         | Some Subaru dealers in LA have been adding mandatory add-ons to
         | goose the price (which is otherwise at MSRP). Glendale, for
         | example, has a mandatory $3000 "protection package" on higher-
         | trim Outbacks.
        
       | JediPig wrote:
       | Nah, dealers are hiding inventory. NPR didn't bother checking in
       | the back.
        
       | thrill wrote:
       | Dealerships make it unbelievably painful as a matter of course. I
       | bought my most recent car coming off lease. Even though I
       | arranged all this online and arrived with a certified check, it
       | still took me 3 hours to get the paperwork done when I showed up
       | there - talk about captured. It was ridiculous.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2022-09-01 23:02 UTC)