[HN Gopher] Pakistan's floods have created 100km-wide inland lak...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Pakistan's floods have created 100km-wide inland lake, satellite
       images
        
       Author : pseudolus
       Score  : 198 points
       Date   : 2022-08-31 15:15 UTC (7 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.cnn.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.cnn.com)
        
       | StanislavPetrov wrote:
       | When it comes to "climate change", most of the focus is
       | unfortunately on the degree to which human activity is involved.
       | The fact is that the climate of the earth has been changing,
       | drastically and continuously, throughout the history of the
       | planet. Just 13,000 years ago the oceans were 360 feet(!!) lower.
       | While nobody should have any doubt that pollution from human
       | activity has a small influence on the climate (as well as many
       | other harmful side effects), we should all keep in mind the big
       | picture. The climate _is_ going to change, drastically, in the
       | near term (geologically speaking), whether or not our behavior is
       | involved at all. If we were a forward thinking society, we would
       | be putting our efforts and our resources into preparing for
       | inevitable climate changes that will have drastic effects across
       | the globe, rather than keeping our heads in the sand and
       | believing that the climate will remain stable if we just cut our
       | carbon output.
       | 
       | https://www.e-education.psu.edu/earth107/sites/www.e-educati...
        
       | enviclash wrote:
       | Any urban planner out there with info about the influence of
       | urbanisation on the disaster? Increasing climate change and
       | increasing urbanisation are a global ticking cocktail.
        
       | amriksohata wrote:
       | They desperately need aid however I fear the money will again
       | fall into the wrong hands, isi or military to use it to fund war
       | and weapons. Be careful who you donate to
        
       | DoreenMichele wrote:
       | There is a book called _Salt Dreams_ about the history of water
       | in the Southwestern US. One of the things it details is that the
       | Salton Sea is something that has come and gone before. This time
       | around, it is failing to evaporate and disappear due to run off
       | from agricultural irrigation.
       | 
       | Water interacting with otherwise arid landscapes is complicated.
       | It can be simultaneously devastating and life giving.
       | 
       | It is perhaps a thing humans need to get better at interacting
       | with given the state of the climate.
        
         | anon291 wrote:
         | The Salton sea is shrinking.
        
           | DoreenMichele wrote:
           | It began shrinking after 1999 when water use became more
           | efficient. Without agricultural runoff, it should have
           | disappeared decades ago.
        
             | mikestew wrote:
             | The Salton Sea shouldn't exist at all. Had arrogance not
             | overtaken those thinking they'd bring irrigation to the
             | desert, the Salton Sea would still be the bone-dry Salton
             | Sink. But after the canal and headgate failure, et. al.,
             | and the Colorado River flowed into the Salton Sink for two
             | years, now we go from Sink to Sea. (And to be fair, it
             | wasn't all due to arrogance; several floods one after
             | another didn't help.)
             | 
             | In short, the Salton Sea was the result of what was
             | probably one of the worst humanitarian and ecological
             | disasters in California history.
        
               | DoreenMichele wrote:
               | The evidence is that this isn't the first time there was
               | water there. Regardless of what contribution human
               | activity made this time, the area has a long history of
               | periodic flooding creating a temporary lake as evidenced
               | by geological markers and Indigenous oral traditions.
        
               | mikestew wrote:
               | I considered adding "...under current ecological
               | conditions", but I though it obvious that natural
               | flooding cycles were not responsible for this incarnation
               | of the Salton Sea. I guess not. There is a good
               | documentary on the Salton Sea entitled _The Miracle of
               | the Salton Sea_ that has outstanding old film footage
               | from the early days, and explains how the current
               | incarnation came about, though the Wikipedia page
               | probably gives the same, if less well-presented,
               | information.
        
               | DoreenMichele wrote:
               | My previous remarks about agricultural runoff already
               | agree with your observation that this incarnation and its
               | duration is substantially influenced by human activity.
               | 
               | I will note a pet peeve of mine: humans are animals
               | indigenous to this planet. We didn't fly in from another
               | galaxy for the express purpose of fucking with it for
               | funsies.
               | 
               | Other animals shape their environment and alter the
               | landscape. Alligators help create swamps and keep them
               | alive. Beavers build dams. Etc.
               | 
               | Not saying humans shouldn't be mindful of the
               | consequences of their actions, but it's a tired trope
               | that human activity is somehow fundamentally different
               | from that of other animals.
        
               | [deleted]
        
               | kyboren wrote:
               | Like all animals, we eat, fuck, and die, but humanity's
               | ability to alter the landscape far exceeds that of
               | alligators and beavers. Our combined and fantastically
               | developed use of reason, tools, and written language have
               | elevated humanity to a fundamentally different level.
               | We're each of us now demigods and the world is our golden
               | goose.
               | 
               | Only humanity and celestial bodies can kill nearly all
               | life on Earth. Only humanity can so dramatically raise
               | atmospheric carbon dioxide PPM as we've done. Only
               | humanity engineers earth and waterworks on hundred-km
               | scales.
               | 
               | Sure, it's our home planet, too and we have a right to be
               | here and alter our environment to support our existence
               | like every other animal does. But no other animal can
               | fuck up the planet more than humans can and do. No other
               | animal even comes close.
        
               | DoreenMichele wrote:
               | Perhaps you've heard of the lowly ant?
               | 
               | Climate change:
               | 
               | https://www.cbsnews.com/news/can-ants-change-the-course-
               | of-c....
               | 
               | As an invasive species fucking things up for others,
               | including humans:
               | 
               | https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/e
               | ap....
               | 
               | Ants have big impact on environment as 'ecosystem
               | engineers'
               | 
               | https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/01/11013113322
               | 7.h...
        
               | wizofaus wrote:
               | Pretty sure bacteria made a much more massive difference
               | to the earth's atmosphere/ climate than humans ever
               | have/will do. Accepted it wasn't a single species.
        
         | hahaitsfunny wrote:
        
         | indus wrote:
         | It had a thing called "Bombay Beach" .. LOL.
        
           | subsubzero wrote:
           | I went there in 2020 to check it out(Salton Sea and Bombay
           | beach). Its a place that is not talked about alot in
           | California as its a huge man made natural catastrophe. Bombay
           | beach was really eerie as there was all this infra there from
           | a more prosperous time(signs with ladies in swimsuits being
           | pulled by a boat and well dressed people drinking by the
           | "sea"). Saw many dead fish and their skeletons littering the
           | beach, along with rusting playground equipment. A small
           | contingent of artists have taken up residence in the deserted
           | town and one of them made a "sothebys real estate" bombay
           | beach storefront which I thought was quite funny.
        
             | reaperducer wrote:
             | _Its a place that is not talked about alot in California_
             | 
             | Maybe you mean "Northern California." In Southern
             | California, it's very well known. I knew about it for
             | decades, and I didn't even live in California at the time.
             | 
             |  _a huge man made natural catastrophe._
             | 
             | People on the internet like to call it a "man made"
             | catastrophe. It wasn't. It was caused by flash flooding
             | that overflowed the Colorado River.
             | 
             | Yes, there was a minor irrigation canal between the two
             | places, but nothing that was large enough to cause this
             | catastrophe. Especially since, geologically speaking, the
             | Salton Sea has existed, evaporated, existed, and evaporated
             | over and over again before any humans even lived in the
             | area.
             | 
             | Humans later took advantage of the natural catastrophe to
             | irrigate farms and build resorts, but that didn't cause the
             | problems. I've been there dozens of times, and those
             | beaches are made of millennia of fish bones, not just a
             | hundred years' worth.
             | 
             | It's a drying saline lake, and toxic dust blowing off of it
             | is normal in a desert environment. People who live in the
             | southwest have known that for centuries. It's even a plot
             | point in a number of old cowboy books. There are hundreds
             | of similar lakes in the surrounding desert. But since you
             | can Google Salton Sea on the internet and someone made a
             | video, people act like it's a one-off. If you're not a
             | tourist, you know it's not.
        
               | MichaelCollins wrote:
               | If the Salton Sea were in an "Old World" region settled
               | for thousands of years, then the people who live near it
               | would have cultural memory of the Salton Sea drying and
               | flooding numerous times and would not be shocked when it
               | happened again. Developed California is _very_ young;
               | most people who live there today don 't have a very long
               | family history on the land. Their families arrived in
               | California one or two centuries ago, which they consider
               | 'a long time ago'. Californians lack much experience with
               | their land, so they're shocked when things like this
               | happen.
        
               | DoreenMichele wrote:
               | There are dry lake beds everywhere in SoCal. When it
               | rains enough to temporarily fill them, shrimp hatch out.
        
         | samschooler wrote:
         | So there is another book called _Where the Water Goes_. In that
         | book the author talks about how if the Salton Sea does
         | disappear the accumulation of dust, fertilizer and other less
         | than great chemicals may be picked up by winds and
         | significantly reduce air quality for the region. So we 're
         | between a rock and a hard place at this point.
        
       | aniijbod wrote:
       | > Pakistan's floods have created 100km-wide inland lake,
       | satellite images
       | 
       | Is an 'inland lake' different to an 'offshore lake'?
        
         | JumpCrisscross wrote:
         | > _Is an 'inland lake' different to an 'offshore lake'?_
         | 
         | I think it refers to an inland body of water with no access to
         | the sea, sort of like a salt lake [1]. (I upvoted because it's
         | an interesting question. But it would be better received if
         | phrased plainly versus sarcastically.)
         | 
         | [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lake
        
           | robertlagrant wrote:
           | > But it would be better received if phrased plainly versus
           | sarcastically.
           | 
           | The perils of thinking people receive things objectively. I
           | didn't think it was sarcastic; it's phrased about as
           | neutrally as I can imagine.
        
             | JumpCrisscross wrote:
             | > _it 's phrased about as neutrally as I can imagine_
             | 
             | Try "what is an inland lake?"
             | 
             | It's the question, plainly. You aren't levying a guess
             | against a contrived hypothetical ("offshore lake" isn't a
             | thing, and could objectively be parsed as facetious).
        
       | andy_ppp wrote:
       | Um, I really hope I'm incorrect on this but is the green bit that
       | has flooded fertile farmland next to a river? I'm asking if a
       | famine will be a down stream result of this catastrophe.
        
         | hedora wrote:
         | You're correct:
         | 
         | https://time.com/6209889/pakistan-food-floods/
         | 
         | tl;dr: This will lead to rice and cotton shortages, compounding
         | this year's wheat shortages (climate, Putin) and olive /
         | sunflower oil shortages (Spain's megadrought).
        
           | pvaldes wrote:
           | Spains drought [1], fueled in part by more than 50 criminal
           | mega-wildfires. What happened in Spain in 2022 is not climate
           | change, is environmental terrorism.
           | 
           | Last week a woman was caught starting a wildfire in Galicia
           | by a police after seven wildfires occur in the same area.
           | 
           | Environmental terrorism... and maybe even economic sabotage.
           | 
           | If there is a team of puppets, there must be a puppeteer
           | somewhere. Right?. We had a interesting high number of events
           | targeting tourism. More than 6000 wildfires with many very
           | big wildfires in categories rarely seen before, several train
           | sabotages (optic fiber stolen for no reason, and a train
           | exiting from a tunnel directly into a wildfire) in a country
           | with an economy based in tourism. A high number of wildfires
           | also in France, Portugal and Romania but Spain suffered the
           | bulk of the attacks.
           | 
           | [1] I don't think that the mega prefix is justified still
        
             | kranke155 wrote:
             | Incendiaries or people with mental illness that leads them
             | to do this have always existed. What makes you think that
             | this year something unusual happened? Most likely the
             | number of people doing this is the same as ever, but
             | droughts have made their consequences more extreme.
        
         | kube-system wrote:
         | > turning what were once agricultural fields into a giant
         | inland lake
         | 
         | From the article
        
         | erellsworth wrote:
         | I don't know about that image in particular, but most likely
         | the answer is yes.
         | 
         | https://time.com/6209889/pakistan-food-floods/
        
         | tenpies wrote:
         | > 'm asking if a famine will be a down stream result of this
         | catastrophe.
         | 
         | There was already a secular trend of Pakistan having to import
         | ever-larger amounts of food[1].
         | 
         | Unfortunately the minute Putin invaded Ukraine, we saw one of
         | the world's breadbaskets invade another of the world's
         | breadbaskets and the West lost its mind with sanctions. The
         | EU's reaction is "we'll do whatever it takes" which is a nice
         | way of saying "we'll out-bid everyone else for food and
         | energy". From that moment, most of Africa and many Asian
         | countries were condemned by the West to face famines - just so
         | Europe wouldn't face the total consequences of its own
         | sanctions. Pakistan is one of the countries that will be out-
         | bid by the EU.
         | 
         | Pakistan was already expected to raise imports before this
         | flood[2]. I cannot imagine how bad it's going to be now that
         | they have the confluence of terrible flooding and, Putin and
         | the EU exporting famine to much of the world.
         | 
         | Everyone that can should consider donating to Pakistani aid.
         | 
         | ---
         | 
         | [1] https://www.dawn.com/news/1630378
         | 
         | [2] https://www.world-grain.com/articles/17140-pakistan-
         | expected...
        
           | slt2021 wrote:
           | you argument lacks logic. Pakistan is not EU and can easily
           | import food from russia, just like India is buying russian
           | oil at a great discounts.
        
           | jotm wrote:
           | Fuck Russia, but Pakistan does not have sanctions on it. And
           | the EU won't do anything to them if they keep importing from
           | Russia.
           | 
           | Perhaps use "US" instead of "EU", it works better on the
           | morons believing Russian garbage.
        
             | netsharc wrote:
             | The poorer countries of the world have taken a "Well... we
             | have nothing to say" stance about the invasion because
             | that's the issue: they're poor. What if they pick the
             | losing side and get punished to hunger and economic
             | freezing-out by the winner(s)? Geopolitically, they were
             | probably not sure if China was going to throw its weight
             | behind Putin - imagine what China would be doing/saying if
             | Putin successfully occupied Ukraine and controlled its food
             | output - sure today we can say "That was never going to
             | happen", but at the end of February, many governments of
             | the world didn't know that.
             | 
             | In any case, do you think if Pakistan said "We join the
             | EU/US in sanctioning Russia", they'd be getting extra help
             | from the EU/US at the moment? I like the EU but they seem
             | to have been running around in internal panic themselves,
             | they're not going to give a crap about Pakistan...
        
             | vkou wrote:
             | > but Pakistan does not have sanctions on it. And the EU
             | won't do anything to them if they keep importing from
             | Russia.
             | 
             | Exactly. Russia is a pariah state for the EU, but the EU
             | does not treat states trading with it as pariah states.
        
       | indus wrote:
       | Read it somewhere that the Indus valley water system was the
       | setting of the biblical floods. The delta of five rivers used to
       | be as big as Alaska.
        
       | hertzrat wrote:
       | This is apocalyptic. Imagine something 100km from where you live,
       | and that whole span between you and there being under water
       | tomorrow. in a movie, that wouldn't feel real no matter how good
       | the special effects are, it's too out there
        
         | throwrqX wrote:
         | I feel like this hasn't gotten the attention it deserves
         | worldwide relative to the amount of suffering it is causing.
        
           | DoreenMichele wrote:
           | Pakistan is a nation of children and refugees. It's not well
           | positioned to self advocate on the world stage.
           | 
           |  _Pakistan is the world 's fifth-most-populous country.
           | 
           | The population is young: in 2019 34.8% were thought to be 14
           | or younger_
           | 
           | https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Youth_in_Pakistan
           | 
           |  _Pakistan has one of the world 's youngest populations.
           | 
           | The country's population structure is relatively young, with
           | a median age of 19.
           | 
           | Pakistan is also thought to have the world's fourth-largest
           | refugee population, estimated at 1.4 million in mid-2021_
           | 
           | https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_Pakistan
        
             | kshacker wrote:
             | Nation of Children - sure.
             | 
             | Nation of Refugees - now or always? Now due to floods I can
             | understand. But if always, I do not understand. They have
             | been a "stable" country for half a century. When I say
             | "stable", I mean without any land being lost or won since
             | 1971, which puts the last major change at almost 51 years
             | and 51 years should be a long time for any refugees to be
             | assimilate, no?
        
               | MichaelCollins wrote:
               | 50 years is nothing if you're talking about geo-
               | engineering projects to stabilize your community. Dike
               | construction in the Netherlands has been underway for
               | well over a thousand years. 50 years probably isn't even
               | enough time for the importance of such projects to truly
               | permeate a culture.
        
               | kshacker wrote:
               | I am just trying to understand what the parent commenter
               | meant by "nation of refugees".
        
             | okdood64 wrote:
             | > Pakistan is a nation of children and refugees. It's not
             | well positioned to self advocate on the world stage.
             | 
             | I don't understand. Why can't the government self advocate
             | given it's a nation of children and refugees?
        
               | Loughla wrote:
               | Maybe I'm jaded, but I take it to mean that the country
               | is poor for the reasons stated. It has neither the global
               | pull, nor the connections to massive corporations to make
               | it anything but a humanitarian issue. This is a harder
               | sell to other countries than a business and industry
               | issue.
        
             | noSyncCloud wrote:
             | >median age of 19.
             | 
             | This is wild. Google says the US is 38, Germany 45, Japan
             | 48 for some random examples (the top search result for me
             | says Pakistan median age is 22, which is still crazy).
        
           | ethbr0 wrote:
           | More people should be aware of countries by relative
           | population:
           | https://ourworldindata.org/uploads/2021/12/Population-
           | cartog...
           | 
           | It makes you understand the importance of Brazil, Nigeria,
           | Pakistan, Bangladesh, and Indonesia for things that impact
           | people.
        
           | rajman187 wrote:
           | Suffering has been normalized for some, unfortunately, and
           | any devastation striking that region is glossed over almost
           | as if calamity is expected to befall. See for instance the
           | outcry and support for Ukraine (not diminishing their dire
           | circumstances by any means) and immediate call to take
           | refugees while sympathy for southern and western Asian states
           | has fallen to the wayside.
        
             | steve76 wrote:
        
         | testfoobar wrote:
         | Lots of videos of this on TikTok. The volume of water in some
         | videos is mind boggling.
         | 
         | https://www.tiktok.com/tag/swatflood?lang=en
        
         | SpaceManNabs wrote:
         | > in a movie, that wouldn't feel real no matter how good the
         | special effects are, it's too out there
         | 
         | This entire thing just reminds me of Day After Tomorrow (2004).
         | Although the movie had a lot of bad science, way too many
         | people called the premise and social outcomes of the movie
         | ridiculous. Hell, the South Park criticism of it alone
         | significantly pushed this current batch of climate deniers.
        
           | yongjik wrote:
           | Saying that _The Day After Tomorrow_ had a lot of bad science
           | is a bit of an understatement, isn 't it? It's like saying
           | Hershey's chocolate bar has a lot of chocolate in it.
        
             | pbronez wrote:
             | Have you tried Hershey's bars? Hard to call that stuff
             | chocolate...
        
               | MichaelCollins wrote:
               | That's the joke.
        
           | marcosdumay wrote:
           | The premise and outcome of some large scale disaster you
           | imagined being ridiculous does not means that any scenario of
           | large scale disaster is ridiculous.
        
           | ericmay wrote:
           | heh that episode of South Park is seared into my brain
           | 
           | > Two days before the day after tomorrow
           | 
           | > Bah gawd... that's today
        
             | andrei_says_ wrote:
             | Which episode is this?
        
               | HelloMcFly wrote:
               | Two days before the day after tomorrow
        
           | walthamstow wrote:
           | I had the same thought when reading about the 4inch
           | hailstones that fell in Catalonia yesterday
        
             | pvaldes wrote:
             | And like what happened in that film, a baby was killed
             | yesterday by hailstones, sadly.
        
           | codyb wrote:
           | I thought it was telling when South Park basically walked
           | back the whole "The vote's between Shit Sandwich and a Turd"
           | or whatever and said "Vote for Hillary".
           | 
           | It was as if they hadn't realized the amount that people draw
           | from their work.
           | 
           | It was _pretty explicit_, the turnaround. Or at least it felt
           | that way to me.
        
             | reaperducer wrote:
             | _It was as if they hadn 't realized the amount that people
             | draw from their work._
             | 
             | I think that thinking people massively underestimate the
             | influence that cartoons have on common people.
             | 
             | It seems like 90% of the people who argue against religion
             | on the internet got everything they know about religion
             | from cartoons like South Park. Or everything they know
             | about Texas from King of the Hill.
             | 
             | There was a newspaper article a few years ago about how
             | some massive percentage of Britons thought The Simpsons was
             | an accurate depiction of Americans, and didn't understand
             | that it was a lampoon.
        
               | nebula8804 wrote:
               | The Simpsons humor is funny because it is based in
               | reality...thats how humor works.
               | 
               | Every character and trope is a humorous representation of
               | something in America. Are you American? Because I am and
               | i've met someone like every character in the Simpsons in
               | real life.
        
               | MichaelCollins wrote:
               | Comedy shows/etc sway the opinions of the general public,
               | but shield themselves from criticism by saying _" It's
               | just comedy bro, chill out"_. Quite a conundrum, but what
               | can you do about it? Newspaper editorials do the same
               | thing, using _" it's just an opinion"_ as a rhetorical
               | shield. Virtually any media does something like this in
               | one form or another.
        
         | ElijahLynn wrote:
         | 100km == 62miles
        
         | daveslash wrote:
         | This is mind boggling.
         | 
         | How deep is it? I mean, I'm sure there are areas that are a few
         | inches deep and others that are dozens of feet, but generally
         | speaking -- is this more or less than the height of a single
         | story?
         | 
         | Edit: And is it generally of similar depth or does it vary
         | greatly from locale to locale?
        
           | tromp wrote:
           | Or mouth/nose height?
        
         | hotpotamus wrote:
         | It's the kind of story that gets passed down across generations
         | and even makes it into holy books.
        
           | jimjimjim wrote:
           | underrated comment. semi-localized catastrophe + oral history
           | + time => whole world catastrophe for a population
        
         | vondur wrote:
         | From the NASA image it looks like the whole area is a flood
         | plain. Similar to a large area of the Los Angeles basin. We
         | have a paved riverbed system to get rid of water from heavy
         | rains which periodically occur. I assume Pakistan doesn't have
         | the resources to do something like that.
        
           | mapt wrote:
           | You have a paved riverbed system to get rid of moderate rains
           | which periodically occur.
           | 
           | That will be insufficient for a 100-year flood (~1000 acres
           | underwater by current mapping), and a 200-year or 500-year
           | flood would put significant fractions of the city underwater.
           | 
           | https://eng2.lacity.org/projects/LARIVER_Glendale_Narrows/do.
           | ..
        
           | boruto wrote:
           | Yes it is Indus river basin
        
         | 3pt14159 wrote:
         | This is Great Lakes of Canada and the USA type distances here
         | ladies and gentlemen.
         | 
         | Crazy stuff.
        
           | lhorie wrote:
           | I was trying to figure out a relatable comparison on a map.
           | Looking from one side of the flood lake to the other would be
           | like trying to spot Niagara Falls from Toronto, or San Jose
           | from San Francisco - never mind that the distance is large
           | enough for Earth's curvature to get in the way. And that's
           | just thinking of it as a cross-sectional view of the lake,
           | which doesn't say much about _area_.
           | 
           | The way I ended up explaining it to my kids was that 33M
           | people were affected. San Francisco population is ~800k, so
           | around 40 SFs worth of people are impacted.
        
           | boppo1 wrote:
           | Well, not quite. The great lakes are rather deeper.
           | 
           | That's not to say this isn't shocking or a sign of radical
           | climate change.
        
       | mistrial9 wrote:
       | Is it true that only 30,000 years ago the level of the sea was
       | very different? lower in that case, exposing the land bridge at
       | Alaska, and connecting the Islands north of Australia.. and
       | previous to that, the sea level was much higher? evidence is the
       | inland sea that is California Central Valley..
        
         | colechristensen wrote:
         | Yes, there has been a cycle going on in the most recent era of
         | flipping between glaciers growing and shrinking. I don't recall
         | the actual date but the most recent maximum glacier coverage
         | was on the order of 30,000 years ago. The whole of human
         | civilization we know about more or less happened since the last
         | retreat of the glaciers.
         | 
         | There have also been times when the polar caps melted
         | completely and there were rainforests pole to pole.
        
           | lizknope wrote:
           | If you go back tens of millions of years ago there were
           | dinosaurs in polar regions. Of course it was much warmer then
           | 
           | https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/the-strange-lives-
           | of-...
           | 
           | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_Polar_region_of_the_Cret.
           | ..
        
             | cwmma wrote:
             | The dinosaurs in the polar reason isn't because it was
             | warmer, it's because the Strait of Magellan were closed.
             | 
             | One of the reasons we are in an ice age right now (which
             | refers to a period where you have periodicly advancing and
             | retreating glaciers) is because you have a continent on the
             | pole and a clear sea lane around it, before the Strait of
             | Magellan opened you have a current that circulated between
             | the poles and equater evening out the temperatures allowing
             | for ice free poles.
        
               | monort wrote:
               | The same three atmospheric cells exist in the northern
               | hemisphere and there is no continent there. Why is that?
               | 
               | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atmospheric_circulation
        
               | cwmma wrote:
               | Those are different, this is about water circulation not
               | air circulation, water has a much higher specific heat so
               | it it's far more important when it comes to temperature
               | circulation.
        
           | kurupt213 wrote:
           | Humans evolved under much warmer conditions than exist today
        
         | nigerian1981 wrote:
         | I don't see how given the Earth is only 6000 years old.
        
           | GekkePrutser wrote:
           | And flat, so any excess water will just run over the edge.
        
             | SketchySeaBeast wrote:
             | Good thing turtles are OK getting wet.
        
               | munk-a wrote:
               | If they can put up with elephants standing on their backs
               | then a bit a water is clearly not going to bother them.
        
         | wcoenen wrote:
         | The past 5000 years have been quite stable, but there have been
         | dramatic changes from melting ice caps before that. See
         | https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Post-Glacial_Sea_L...
         | 
         | With a high enough warming rate, we might get a chance to see
         | what a "meltwater pulse" looks like :-/
        
         | thro388 wrote:
         | Yes, there is periodic cycle, depending on ice ages.
        
         | AlotOfReading wrote:
         | Modern sea level is the highest it's been in over 100k years.
         | Central valley hasn't been anything close to an inland sea for
         | about 1.5m years, but that has more to do with deposited
         | sediment than sea level.
        
       | Animats wrote:
       | For years, there was a lot of political pressure on climate
       | scientists to not overestimate future damage. Now it turns out
       | that damage was underestimated.
       | 
       | Sea level rise used to be talked about in terms of inches. Now,
       | meters.[1]
       | 
       | [1] https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2022/aug/29/major-
       | se...
        
       | photochemsyn wrote:
       | Pakistan foreign minister:
       | 
       | > "And while we understand that the new reality of climate change
       | means more extreme weather, or monsoons, more extreme heat waves
       | like we saw earlier this year, the scale of the current flood is
       | of apocalyptic proportions. We certainly hope it's not a new
       | climate reality."
       | 
       | Pakistan also had major record-breaking flooding in 2010, and
       | rainfall patterns appear very similar to this event:
       | 
       | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2010_Pakistan_floods
       | 
       | It's probably a safe bet that Pakistan will continue to see these
       | kinds of events at least once every ten years for the foreseeable
       | future, with a likely increase in frequency and severity. Warming
       | the planet means pumping more moisture into the atmosphere, which
       | in combination with more random global atmospheric circulation
       | patterns, means more extremes of flood and drought.
        
         | hertzrat wrote:
        
           | photochemsyn wrote:
           | It's pretty clear that the increased water vapor in the
           | atmosphere, in combination with continued Himalayan glacial
           | melt, is loading the dice. Note also that decadal flooding in
           | Pakistan has been a trend going back to at least the 1970s.
        
           | killyourcar wrote:
           | That's not the causality the parent is drawing. They are
           | saying these two events are likely because an increase in
           | temperature increases moisture in the air, increases
           | flooding. We're seeing more floods as an effect, not a cause.
        
         | petre wrote:
         | It's just politicians shifting the blame on climate change.
         | Makes you wonder why the Netherlands don't have record-breaking
         | floods.
        
           | nicbou wrote:
           | The Netherlands are a rich developed nation. It helps. No
           | monsoon there either.
        
             | orbital-decay wrote:
             | What also helps is that they started building dams
             | centuries ago.
        
               | ignoramous wrote:
               | With the loot from East Indies?
        
               | pvaldes wrote:
               | Probably. You only need mud and wood and to stop whining
               | about the chilling cold to start. Concrete and iron can
               | come later.
               | 
               | I don't see many gems encrusted in the dams in any case.
               | Do they use cars and fridges in East Indies?
        
           | boruto wrote:
           | I wonder why pakistan doesn't have a sea barrier like
           | Netherlands
        
             | CapitalistCartr wrote:
             | This isn't flooding from the sea. Such a wall would make
             | this worse.
        
           | boredpudding wrote:
           | We literally had that.
           | 
           | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2021_European_floods#Netherlan.
           | ..
        
           | dekhn wrote:
           | The Netherlands has some of the best water policy and
           | technology in the world and they staked the land of their
           | country on that. But, they did have a number of floods and
           | they continue to be at risk for out-of-distribution flooding.
        
         | skippyboxedhero wrote:
         | They have been happening for the last century. The reason why
         | is simple: that part of the country is very fertile,
         | agriculture is a big part of the economy, lots of people build
         | houses in an area that they know will almost certainly flood
         | within a few years (and the reason the govt doesn't do anything
         | about it despite flooding being a major political issue is
         | corruption).
         | 
         | This isn't to say that climate change isn't happening, but:
         | flood plain that has flooded for centuries floods is not
         | surprising. And it is fairly normal in that region for lots of
         | people to live in flood zones because they are fertile
         | agriculturally (due, I believe, to the flooding).
        
           | throwaway123989 wrote:
           | > and the reason the govt doesn't do anything about it
           | despite flooding being a major political issue is corruption
           | 
           | Could you provide evidences of governmental corruption that
           | actually result into this?
           | 
           | Something like: * A given amount of budget were allocated to
           | hire public sector workers to do necessary management work
           | (coordinating, communication, planning of non-flood-hazard
           | residential zones etc.)
           | 
           | * A proof that the above budget meets the required efforts
           | 
           | * Evidences that the people are cooperating with the
           | government, if the government actually carried out such
           | campaingh.
           | 
           | Corruption is everywhere. In the sense that individuals not
           | doing what they suppose because of selfish motivations.
           | 
           | But to blame a government on systematic corruption, there has
           | to be evidences that resources are available, but the
           | government choose to neglect.
           | 
           | The liberal fantasy that "eliminating corruption, then your
           | imagination will become reality" does not exist in reality at
           | all.
        
       | random314 wrote:
       | According to some commenters here (eg rayiner) this is simply
       | called monsoon. The damage that conservative, right wing thinking
       | does to the society, environment and a person's brain is
       | preposterous. Not even the example of Nazi Germany can cause
       | conservatives to course correct.
        
       | rch wrote:
       | > turning what were once agricultural fields into a giant inland
       | lake. It's a shocking transformation
       | 
       | Is the agricultural capacity of this area dependent on periodic
       | flooding, similar to historical patterns of the Nile?
        
         | sa1 wrote:
         | Periodic floods bringing down alluvial soil are definitely part
         | of what made these regions fertile and highly populated. But I
         | do not know if floods are continually needed to maintain the
         | fertility, or how this flood compares to historic floods.
        
         | alephnerd wrote:
         | Some amount of flooding is expected in Kaccha/Katcha Doaba
         | land, but this level of flooding was very anomalous due to
         | Climate Change plus some questionable urban planning. Add to
         | that the fact that ongoing local elections in Sindh has
         | paralyzed the state's civil service and this became a horrible
         | calamity.
         | 
         | edit:
         | 
         | Je tussi ek kissan da mundeh ki comment nu downvote kar rehe
         | hai, tenu khuch galt fami hegi. Sindh, Pakhtunkwa, Punjab,
         | Himachal, Jammu, Kashmir, Haryana, Uttarakhand, aur Delhi NCR
         | di kissani saili ta bilkul same to same hege Angrezo aur
         | Environment di whajese.
        
           | icemelt8 wrote:
           | First comment in Punjabi on Hacker news :) ... You right, we
           | are together in this climate change disaster
        
             | alephnerd wrote:
             | Agreed! There needs to be much more coordination at the
             | SAARC level to solve these issues. Honestly cross-border
             | trade would be amazing for Northern India, Pakistan, and
             | Afghanistan. The Partition and instability of the 70s-90s
             | really destroyed the economic potential of the region.
        
           | selimthegrim wrote:
           | Translation: Those of you who are downvoting a farmer's
           | (Edit: son's, munda can be more generic term for person too)
           | comment are misinformed. Farmers of Sindh, ..., and Delhi NCR
           | are in the same boat because of the British and the
           | environment.
        
             | alephnerd wrote:
             | * son of a farmer. never lived on a farm myself (grew up
             | here in North America) but my dad did growing up and during
             | summer vacations we'd often help my grandfather as well
             | with the kharif crop.
        
         | UncleOxidant wrote:
         | doubtful that it's depending on this level of flooding.
        
           | rch wrote:
           | It could be unprecedented on 100-1000 year timescales, and
           | still be within geologic norms.
           | 
           | Just trying to categorize this event relative to e.g.
           | Greenland ice sheet melting.
        
             | dwringer wrote:
             | Reading this thread got me to pull up a map and notice the
             | Mohenjo-Daro site[0] is evidently being damaged by the
             | current flooding, particularly in excavated areas[1]. It
             | would appear that in the 1960's there was a flurry of
             | publications arguing about the idea that perhaps the
             | Mohenjo-Daro civilization declined precisely because its
             | cities had been destroyed by catastrophic floods. There's a
             | lot to read, but I found this article[2] from 1965 that
             | goes into a lot of detail about studies of flooding in the
             | area, and mentions some of the research of the time.
             | 
             | [0]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mohenjo-daro
             | 
             | [1]https://odishatv.in/news/international/pakistan-floods-
             | damag...
             | 
             | [2]https://www.penn.museum/sites/expedition/civilization-
             | and-fl...
        
       | sporkland wrote:
       | From the article for those that don't click:
       | 
       | > Killed 1,162 people, injured 3,554 and affected 33 million
       | since mid-June.
       | 
       | Shocked I haven't heard more than tiny references to this before
       | now.
        
       | yrgulation wrote:
       | Poor management, corruption and a careless society amplify
       | disasters times over. I am sorry for the people of pakistan, but
       | this will happen again, and again. With climate change it will
       | get even worse.
        
         | munk-a wrote:
         | It's important to specify where that blame of corruption and a
         | careless society are placed - if Pakistan lived in a vacuum
         | this flood wouldn't have been nearly as devastating. Countries
         | that produced outsized amounts of pollution, deny climate
         | change and refuse to act to address it deserve to be in the
         | spotlight as well. China still has their head buried in the
         | sand on this issue and the US is politically divided and all of
         | the actions that have been taken have happened despite strong
         | resistance from half of the political institution.
        
         | dc-programmer wrote:
         | I don't disagree with the analysis but the thought that crossed
         | my mind reading it is that the developed world is trending
         | towards the Pakistans of the world, not away.
         | 
         | Every year kleptocracy and corruption become more normalized
         | and the "me-first" popular movements that have arisen as a
         | response to elite corruption are wholly unequipped to correct
         | course. I am not optimistic my country will properly account
         | for the long effects of climate change on human well-being.
        
       | pvaldes wrote:
       | water can kill but brings new life also.
        
         | daveslash wrote:
         | _" Well, a little rain never hurt anybody..."_
         | 
         |  _" Yeah, But a lot can kill you"_
         | 
         | - Bonnie Hunt, Robin Williams, Jumanji, 1995 (approx 78 minutes
         | in).
        
           | pvaldes wrote:
           | Don't build your home in the middle of the dry riverbed is an
           | old but still surprisingly valid advice
        
         | nomel wrote:
         | It brings fleeting new life, if it's not consistent.
        
         | black_knight wrote:
         | If water kill your child, na water you go use
         | 
         | Water no get enemy
        
         | photochemsyn wrote:
         | Yes, I imagine a lovely bloom of _Vibrio cholerae_ is likely to
         | arise from mass flooding of this sort.
         | 
         | https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/20/1/13-0428_article
         | 
         | > "In August 2010, Pakistan experienced major floods and a
         | subsequent cholera epidemic. To clarify the population dynamics
         | and transmission of Vibrio cholerae in Pakistan, we sequenced
         | the genomes of all V. cholerae O1 El Tor isolates and compared
         | the sequences to a global collection of 146 V. cholerae
         | strains..."
        
           | pvaldes wrote:
           | > I imagine a lovely bloom of Vibrio cholerae is likely to
           | arise from mass flooding
           | 
           | Fixable. All European capitals had cholera epidemics in their
           | past. Scientists like John Snow sweated blood and tears and
           | failed and failed again until fixing it. The Pakistani
           | government could find useful to adopt the solutions that the
           | evil UK developed 200 years ago and are freely available for
           | everybody. Not need to reinvent the wheel anymore.
           | 
           | In any case they had twelve years to do something about it,
           | so are probably much better prepared now.
           | 
           | In a desert I would chose having water over dry-to-the-bone
           | land, all the time. Water is money
        
       | lstodd wrote:
       | That's what you get when you refuse to maintain and develop
       | infrastructure and then build over floodable areas, as many in
       | this thread said.
       | 
       | Same stuff as Katrina and many other less-visible disasters
       | related to "sudden" "floods". Californians can remember the
       | Oroville Dam spillway failure - it's all the same, negligence
       | multiple times over, just on a bit less scale.
        
         | [deleted]
        
       | brunosan wrote:
       | You can use this link to see the appalling scope of this flood.
       | The layers you can toggle in the bottom right: 1) Lastest radar,
       | 2) Last year radar for reference, 3) nighlights as a proxy of
       | population.
       | 
       | I selected radar because it's really good at detecting standing
       | water on the ground (as blue).
       | 
       | [Disclaimer I direct the PC project at Microsoft]
       | 
       | https://planetarycomputer.microsoft.com/explore?c=68.0200%2C...
        
       | buescher wrote:
       | Yes, but how deep?
        
       | NonNefarious wrote:
       | California needs a looooooong straw to drink up that milkshake.
       | 
       | I DRINK IT UP!
        
       | acomjean wrote:
       | I always like the Nasa "earth observatory" pages:
       | 
       | they have the before and after as a zoomed in image.
       | 
       | https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/images/150279/devastating-...
        
       | sremani wrote:
       | I heard the Punjab has a great irrigation program and that is the
       | reason why they do not suffer floods like Sindh, outside of the
       | usual regionalism are there any constraints in developing similar
       | irrigation and flood control apparatus in Sindh.
        
         | alephnerd wrote:
         | Disclaimer - I'm not from that area, but I was talking with a
         | buddy of mine from Larkana about this and the region of Sindh
         | and Punjab that was badly affected is basically a badland with
         | bad governance [0][1][2][3][4]. Also fits in line with the
         | Saraiki folk songs I've listened to. On the northern and
         | central Punjab side I'm not surprised that it was not badly
         | effected thanks to the Canal colonies that the British built
         | out there [5]. My mom's side of the family is from the Jhelum
         | Colony originally before Partition
         | 
         | [0] - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shikarpur_Operation_2021
         | 
         | [1] - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazroo_Narejo
         | 
         | [2] - https://tribune.com.pk/story/2370767/dacoits-kidnap-
         | torture-...
         | 
         | [3] - https://www.dawn.com/news/1625938
         | 
         | [4] -
         | https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.47...
         | 
         | [5] - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Punjab_Canal_Colonies
        
           | jfk13 wrote:
           | Sindh does also have a pretty extensive irrigation network;
           | e.g. see https://www.arcgis.com/apps/View/index.html?appid=21
           | 082183d1....
           | 
           | (I don't know how it compares to that in Punjab, though, nor
           | whether it is well or badly maintained and managed.)
        
             | alephnerd wrote:
             | Based on the GIS dataset it's mostly Wahs, Distis, and
             | Nullehs. You need an actual high capacity canals and locks
             | to mitigate the kind of flooding seen in over the past few
             | days. But the law and order situation in that region is a
             | bit erm, lacking, compared to Northern+Central Punjab where
             | industrial level canals the Brits left behind appear to be
             | maintained. A lot of these regions where the flooding
             | happened are also former princely state areas, so there
             | wasn't that much infrastructural investment.
        
               | selimthegrim wrote:
               | They reline the canals, but other than Taunsa barrage it
               | feels like they haven't put as much effort into new
               | drainage/catchment. Sindh has firmly resisted new
               | upstream dams due to salinity concerns among other
               | things.
        
               | alephnerd wrote:
               | That makes sense. There really needs to be more
               | investment in canal infrastructure in Northern Sindh and
               | Southern Punjab. These kinds of floods were common in
               | East Punjab/Himachal/Jammu back in the 70s and 80s
               | (especially the 1988 flood [0]), but a lot of investment
               | was put into meteorological forecasting, drainage, and
               | disaster preparedness in the 90s and 2000s to try and
               | mitigate something like that from happening again.
               | 
               | [0] - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1988_Punjab_floods
        
           | selimthegrim wrote:
           | My mother spent some time in Guddu growing up, down the road
           | from Kashmore. My cousin who lives nearby to me now grew up
           | in Daharki around the same time early to mid 70s. His bandit
           | stories are a little hair raising. Larkana looked a little
           | rough when I went there about a decade ago but I think there
           | has been substantial highway construction there at the very
           | least since.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2022-08-31 23:01 UTC)