[HN Gopher] SEC Gag Orders Silence the Accused
___________________________________________________________________
SEC Gag Orders Silence the Accused
Author : caprock
Score : 14 points
Date : 2022-08-24 20:50 UTC (2 hours ago)
(HTM) web link (reason.com)
(TXT) w3m dump (reason.com)
| caprock wrote:
| Does anyone know more about the case noted in the article? Are
| there public lists of SEC settlements?
| tarakat wrote:
| Since the SEC is the government, doesn't this practice run afoul
| of the 1st Amendment?
|
| Taking away rights may be an essential part of punishment, but
| the rights taken should be only in pursuit of that punishment
| (e.g. imprisonment takes away the right of free movement).
|
| Then there is also the public's right to know about how
| government agencies act in their name. Imagine if prosecutors
| routinely demanded gag orders as part of plea deals, forbidding
| convicts from discussing their trial or prison conditions. The
| SEC practice is less egregious, but qualitatively equivalent.
| staticman2 wrote:
| This is a civil matter, so it's in some ways more analogous to
| a google employee keeping quiet out of fear they'll be sued for
| violating a non disclosure agreement with google.
|
| Or a rape victim being unable to speak out about the fact they
| were raped due to the terms of the settlement with the rapist.
|
| I guess I'm saying limits on speech due to fear of being sued
| are not unusual under our system.
| tarakat wrote:
| Your examples are contracts between private parties, entered
| freely. This is a contract with the government, signed under
| threat of prosecution.
| staticman2 wrote:
| My examples involve the government (the judicial branch is
| a branch of government) limiting speech on behalf of Google
| or a rapist.
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2022-08-24 23:02 UTC)