[HN Gopher] In 1995, 14 wolves were released into the wild in Ye...
___________________________________________________________________
In 1995, 14 wolves were released into the wild in Yellowstone
National Park
Author : unpredict
Score : 38 points
Date : 2022-08-23 21:03 UTC (1 hours ago)
(HTM) web link (twitter.com)
(TXT) w3m dump (twitter.com)
| bombcar wrote:
| https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1561730584329732096.html
|
| > An estimated 528 wolves resided in the Greater Yellowstone
| Ecosystem as of 2015. As of December 2021, there are at least 95
| wolves in the park. Eight packs were noted. This count marks a
| decrease of 23% from 2020 but is close to the previous decade's
| average end of year count (2010-2019 average = 94.5).
|
| https://www.nps.gov/yell/learn/nature/wolves.htm
| wongarsu wrote:
| > From 1995 to 1997, 41 wild wolves from Canada and northwest
| Montana were released in Yellowstone
|
| That's more than 14 (digits swapped?), but still not a lot from
| a genetic health standpoint. Seems like there's some exchange
| with other populations in the Northern Rocky Mountains, who in
| turn mate with wolves from Canada, so it might be just fine.
| But it's a bit weird for the article to even mention the issue,
| only to then get lost in a tangent about one prevalent
| mutation.
| mrbombastic wrote:
| Wasn't there an article about exactly this topic a few years ago
| or am I crazy? Feels weird to do a tweet thread about it without
| even a reference to it.
| novantadue wrote:
| Michael Crichton gave a talk covering these points.
| thangalin wrote:
| *
| https://www.ted.com/talks/george_monbiot_for_more_wonder_rew...
|
| * https://truenaturefoundation.org/research/how-wolves-
| change-...
|
| * https://www.accuweather.com/en/weather-news/scientists-
| debun...
|
| * https://www.nps.gov/yell/learn/upload/YELLOWSTONE-
| SCIENCE-24...
| jjtheblunt wrote:
| https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wolf_reintroduction is related, I
| think, with good biblio
| iampuero wrote:
| Main purpose of these type of tweets are to go viral and get
| more followers. Hence no citing articles or anything useful
| like that..
| thoughtsimple wrote:
| Scientists Debunk Myth About Yellowstone Wolves.
|
| https://news.yahoo.com/scientists-debunk-myth-yellowstone-wo...
| [deleted]
| wongarsu wrote:
| > Within Yellowstone National Park, no hunting of wolves is
| allowed. Outside the park, Montana, Idaho, and Wyoming regulate
| and manage hunting. Because wolves do not recognize political
| boundaries and often move between different jurisdictions, some
| wolves that live within the park for most of the year, but at
| times move outside the park, are taken in the hunts
|
| So there's a clear evolutionary advantage for wolves that do
| recognize political boundaries. I wonder if that has long-term
| effects on wolf-pack territories.
|
| Edit: quote from
| https://www.nps.gov/yell/learn/nature/wolves.htm, meant to answer
| to bombcar who mentioned it
| elgenie wrote:
| That a behavior runs a higher risk of death doesn't mean that
| it's a evolutionary disadvantage at all, let alone clearly.
|
| You'd have to calculate out the rewards (is letting all of ones
| cubs starve in order to avoid a 0.01% chance of getting hunted
| good?), control for any correlated effects (perhaps respecting
| political boundaries means being overly wary of Yellowstone
| humans and thus less food), and also the standard worse-is-
| better proof-of-fitness games involved in sexual competition (a
| la peacock plumage).
| yarg wrote:
| There's a significant difference between knowingly and
| unknowingly engaging in risky behaviour.
| jonahbenton wrote:
| Every post from whatever this twitter account is...is BS.
| riffic wrote:
| this could have been a blog post.
| dkarl wrote:
| Funny to see coyotes referred to as "jackals." They're similar in
| size and ecological niche, but I thought biologists long ago
| rejected the idea of grouping coyotes together with the jackal
| species. Coyotes are more closely related to wolves.
|
| EDIT: And of course saying "deer" instead of "elk." This reads
| like someone either writing specifically for an audience that
| doesn't know American wildlife, or someone trying to dodge the
| plagiarism filter on a term paper.
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2022-08-23 23:01 UTC)