[HN Gopher] A republished fork of the banned on sanction order T...
___________________________________________________________________
A republished fork of the banned on sanction order Tornado Cash
repositories
Author : Andrew_nenakhov
Score : 37 points
Date : 2022-08-22 22:19 UTC (40 minutes ago)
(HTM) web link (twitter.com)
(TXT) w3m dump (twitter.com)
| rvz wrote:
| What is the point of republishing it on Github? They (GitHub /
| Microsoft) will just remove it and ban it again after announcing
| it.
|
| A better way instead, would be to do what all other projects like
| GNOME, KDE, Tor, wireguard, etc have done before and that is to
| just self-host the repositories instead.
| ChrisAntaki wrote:
| Hopefully the government can identify any forks that achieve
| meaningful TVL and taint the coins
| ipaddr wrote:
| What would that for you? Why the hope?
| coolspot wrote:
| US govt has banned Tornado Cash the organization, not code of
| Tornado Cash.
|
| Github complies to sanctions by removing all repositories owned
| by sanctioned organization. Doesn't mean you can't have a copy
| of their code.
| ChrisAntaki wrote:
| That's good to hear, because the code itself should be
| considered free speech
| toomuchtodo wrote:
| Platforms have the right as is to deplatform undesirable
| speech, including code. Social media platforms do this
| daily (speech, not code).
|
| Freedom of speech protects you from your government.
| cmroanirgo wrote:
| The author explains why it's on GH.
|
| > _I've worked with this code as a researcher and I use it to
| teach my classes, so it's important to me that it stays easily-
| accessible on a major site like GitHub. (This is not the only
| copy, in fact it's a fork of someone else's.)_
| seestem wrote:
| I think this is about proving a point. The point being "code is
| free speech" and to not let GitHub / Microsoft slide and set a
| precedent that takes us back 30 years.
| ChrisAntaki wrote:
| Tornado needs TVL to effectively launder money for criminals.
| Forks without much TVL don't seem that dangerous
| babyshake wrote:
| I wonder if it is possible to have a variation of Tornado where
| the TVL automatically moves to a new deployment at a new random
| address every N blocks, so that it's not as simple to have
| specific addresses sanctioned. I don't know Tornado very well
| and don't know if this would be possible.
| Retr0id wrote:
| TVL is not a property of the source code.
| charcircuit wrote:
| This is a fork of the code. It's not a new deployment.
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2022-08-22 23:00 UTC)