[HN Gopher] Twitter bans Florida Republican for encouraging the ...
___________________________________________________________________
Twitter bans Florida Republican for encouraging the killing of
federal agents
Author : anigbrowl
Score : 19 points
Date : 2022-08-19 20:42 UTC (2 hours ago)
(HTM) web link (www.theverge.com)
(TXT) w3m dump (www.theverge.com)
| evolve2k wrote:
| What is the fundamental value / mindset within America that would
| need to shift for all of this to shift?
| CamperBob2 wrote:
| Hard to address without getting overtly political, but much of
| it comes down to what happened with the rise of right-wing mass
| media. "Indoctrination" is not too strong a word to use. If Fox
| News had never existed, the Republican Party would have had to
| invent it.
|
| Some would argue that the loss of the FCC's Fairness Doctrine
| contributed, but I see that as a non-starter. It would never
| have applied to cable news or to the Internet, only to
| broadcast media, and in any case it would only have given the
| fallacy of "both sides-ism" more credibility than it has
| already.
|
| As far as what it will take to restore the status quo and
| return at least a veneer of civility to partisan politics, I
| have no idea. It probably can't be restored. A good start might
| be to force news outlets to declare themselves as either "News"
| or "Entertainment," rather than the unholy hybrids we have now
| that exist to spread lies, incite violence, and issue
| misleading talking points under the guise of commentary. But
| that has obvious 1A implications. Again, it could have been
| justified as a public-interest requirement for over-the-air
| broadcast outlets, but that ship has sailed.
| r00fus wrote:
| Why do you think the Fairness Doctrine wouldn't have been
| applied to cable/internet (eventually)?
|
| TBH, I think the loss of Fairness Doctrine, Citizens United
| decision, etc are all skirting the real issue: the concept
| that corporations are people. Not enshrined in law, but from
| old Supreme Court decision in 1886.
|
| Make corporations non-people (or limit their personhood
| aggressively) and you can actually punish them effectively
| without a corporate death penalty which is never used.
| CamperBob2 wrote:
| The ability of the FCC to exercise enforcement power over
| broadcast content, seemingly in defiance of the First
| Amendment, is a tradeoff that OTA broadcasters have to
| accept in exchange for their station licenses. In exchange
| for being granted a legally-enforced monopoly over a given
| frequency for a given geographical area, they agree to
| carry programming that's considered to be in the public
| interest, and to adhere to strict content regulations.
|
| Cable networks and websites don't require these monopoly
| privileges, so they aren't, and shouldn't be, required to
| adhere to broadcast content standards.
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2022-08-19 23:02 UTC)