[HN Gopher] Goat Rental - Hire Goats
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Goat Rental - Hire Goats
        
       Author : deanstag
       Score  : 381 points
       Date   : 2022-08-12 03:10 UTC (19 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (hiregoats.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (hiregoats.com)
        
       | robbitt wrote:
       | This is amazing, good friend of the family rents out their goats
       | to farmers and friends for the exact same purpose. Reduce
       | pesticide use, naturally improve farm land all the while
       | providing an ideal food source for meat goats, real ESG
       | innovation at work!
        
       | fredsmith219 wrote:
       | When goats eat weeds will they eat and destroy the whole weed? Or
       | do they eat just down to the surface level of the ground which
       | will let the weed grow back immediately?
        
         | toast0 wrote:
         | Depends on the goat and the weed. My goats only like the
         | flowers of dandelion analogues, but for some other weeds, one
         | will try to get the whole thing out and the others just eat the
         | leaves to the ground.
         | 
         | If you put them in a small space, you'll pretty much get bare
         | earth either way though.
        
       | trissylegs wrote:
       | Seems that NSW has 1 in the northernmost area (Byron) and 1 in
       | the sothernmost area (Bega). I'm sure there's probably some Goats
       | in between.
        
       | yitchelle wrote:
       | Story time - My dad asked the local school which had a goat if he
       | can borrow it for a weekend. It was to tame his backyard. As the
       | backyard was enclosed with no chance of the goat escaping, we
       | left it by itself. The goat was be extremely hungry and ate
       | everything insight including the roots, leaves and bark. By
       | Monday, the backyard is barren and took months recover.
       | 
       | Moral of the story - keep an eye on the goat.
        
         | pagade wrote:
         | Ok, I have to ask. Why did the school have goat?
        
           | yitchelle wrote:
           | It was a progressive school in the country side. I think most
           | of the students are from the local farming community.
        
         | jagged-chisel wrote:
         | What I see is months of not needing to operate a mower.
        
         | dylanjcastillo wrote:
         | Looks like she goat herself in trouble
        
           | ryanlitalien wrote:
           | Perfect Reddit comment ;)
        
         | vitiral wrote:
         | Goats are excellent land management if you have enough land and
         | don't mind everything getting eaten to near the ground
        
           | briffle wrote:
           | our state DOT has rented goats to clean the sides of roads
           | along highways in some rural areas, especially when there are
           | large amount of noxious weeds. The person they hire strings
           | up a bunch of short fiberglass poles for a mile or two along
           | the highway with some wires, puts out some water, and then
           | lets the goats in. Comes back and picks them up a couple of
           | days later, and moves them to the other side.
        
             | vitiral wrote:
             | Goats LOVE poison ivy and oak, and it doesn't hurt them.
             | Don't let them near hemlock though (it will do the same to
             | them as it did Socrates)
        
             | drjasonharrison wrote:
             | Not just some wire but a portable electric fence.
        
         | leobg wrote:
         | In German, there's an old phrase: "Appointing the goat as
         | gardener". You use it when somebody is being made responsible
         | for task for which he is not just incompetent, but where he
         | will actually cause damage - for instance because he has
         | ulterior motives.
        
           | alex_duf wrote:
           | love that, thanks!
        
           | throwawaylinux wrote:
           | Fox guarding the hen house seems like the English equivalent
           | to that.
        
             | cmarschner wrote:
             | That seems to imply maliciousness on the fox' side. The
             | goat is merely ignorant.
        
               | drjasonharrison wrote:
               | Or the goat is contained in too small of an area for too
               | long. Much like an inexperienced person without
               | supervision...
        
               | lostlogin wrote:
               | Some goats are extremely malicious.
        
               | atoav wrote:
               | Goats are fundamental anarchists. They are not evil, they
               | just have a chaotic energy beyond comprehension.
        
               | mechanical_bear wrote:
               | Yeah, you ever look at their evil little eyes. If that
               | isn't maliciousness distilled...
        
               | aitchnyu wrote:
               | And yet in this corner of India, some butchers blindfold
               | goats since they can't proceed while looking them in
               | their cute eyes.
        
               | ngcc_hk wrote:
               | In fact that is why we call lucifer the goat-man, the
               | joke in the tv series lucifer reason aside.
        
             | 0898 wrote:
             | It's similar, but not quite equivalent.
             | 
             | The fox is malicious. It knows it will destroy the
             | property, whereas the goat is happily oblivious to the
             | destruction it brings.
        
               | throwawaylinux wrote:
               | > is not just incompetent, but where he will actually
               | cause damage - for instance because he has ulterior
               | motives.
               | 
               | That made me think it was more. And anyway, as much as
               | the fox does with chickens, the goat knows it will set
               | about to kill and eat plants. There's no real reason to
               | call the fox knowingly malicious and the goat not.
        
               | 0898 wrote:
               | >There's no real reason to call the fox knowingly
               | malicious and the goat not.
               | 
               | I think we imagine foxes to have a level of cunning that
               | a placid goat lacks.
        
               | hutzlibu wrote:
               | Ha, you have not worked with goats before, have you?
               | 
               | Even some sheep like to sneak up and attack from behind.
               | Goats even more so..
               | 
               | But sure most goats lack that bravery, but some have it
               | and the cunning to attack and get to places they are not
               | supposed to be.
        
               | 0898 wrote:
               | Touche, I have zero experience of goats. Thanks for
               | putting me right!
        
               | chongli wrote:
               | Goats are anything but placid. They're tricksters and
               | bullies. They won't hesitate to charge you from behind
               | and knock you down. They will also happily chew on
               | people's clothing and long hair. Goats are jerks! They're
               | also just really funny and lovable.
        
               | vitiral wrote:
               | Rascality and loveability are intertwined and inseparable
        
               | gswdh wrote:
        
               | feet wrote:
               | Only because their prey has a nervous system
        
             | BadOakOx wrote:
             | In Hungarian, we mix the two of yours: Goat guarding the
             | cabbage.
        
               | mns wrote:
               | And to the right, we say "Let the wolf guard the sheep"
               | :)
        
               | juahan wrote:
               | In Finland we have almost exactly the same: Goat guarding
               | the gabbage patch.
        
             | redbar0n wrote:
             | Norwegian equivalent:
             | 
             | <<To let the billy watch the sack of oats.>>
             | 
             | A billy/buck goat is a male goat.
        
               | hendrikrassmann wrote:
               | The German proverb is also about a "Bock", same word,
               | same meaning.
        
           | e12e wrote:
           | Fantastic. I think most of the "equivalents" miss a lot of
           | the nuance.
           | 
           | We don't expect the fox to be any good at guarding the
           | chickens, but the goat could plausibly start out as a good
           | gardener ("mowing" the grass and eating the weeds). But then
           | through enthusiasm and love of the work end up ruining the
           | garden...
        
           | [deleted]
        
           | throwaway2037 wrote:
           | Can you share the German language phrase? I tried to Google
           | for it, but I cannot find anything.
        
             | leobg wrote:
             | Den Bock zum Gartner machen
        
               | bergie wrote:
               | "Pukki kaalimaan vartijana" for the Finnish equivalent
               | (goat guarding the cabbage patch)
        
           | rkagerer wrote:
           | Is the emphasis of what will cause the damage more about the
           | incompetence, or about more purposeful nefarity from the eg.
           | ulterior motives?
        
             | leaflets2 wrote:
             | I think most goats don't have sinister ulterior motives!
             | Except for _one_ goat but probably that 's not the one in
             | your garden
             | 
             | Meaning, I'm guessing it's about happy incompetence and
             | thoughtlessness?
        
         | mikk14 wrote:
         | > with no chance of the goat escaping
         | 
         | Bold assumption there. As they say, "if it doesn't hold water
         | it won't hold a goat."
        
           | throwaway0a5e wrote:
           | As long as extracting whatever food there is is less effort
           | than circumventing the fence the goat will remain...
        
             | mikk14 wrote:
             | I think modeling a goat as a rational agent is also pretty
             | bold :-)
        
           | yitchelle wrote:
           | I guess if we left the goat long enough, it will eat thorough
           | the fence. Then the neighbours garden will also be barren.
        
             | Victerius wrote:
             | I sense a mathematical question.
        
           | vrc wrote:
           | My town stopped its annual "goats clear the park" setup
           | because one goat would consistently escape and wreak havoc on
           | traffic. Pretty solid enclosure, too
        
             | Victerius wrote:
             | The same goat each time?
        
             | Floegipoky wrote:
             | Sounds like they should replace it with "goats clear the
             | park and BBQ"
        
           | bsza wrote:
           | And if it does hold water, they'll climb it anyway.
           | 
           | https://youtu.be/RG9TMn1FJzc
        
         | richardw wrote:
         | Many years ago I heard of a family whose goat ate through the
         | thatch roof and then started eating stuff inside the house.
         | Don't leave the goat alone.
         | 
         | Not a goat farmer so not sure if goats do that. Anyone know?
        
         | 29athrowaway wrote:
         | Note that if tree bark is eaten all around the tree
         | circumference, the tree dies.
         | 
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Girdling
        
       | strickman wrote:
       | Just finished watching Clarkson's Farm; Jeremy got some sheep for
       | this purpose. Recommend watching.
        
         | sph wrote:
         | I second the recommendation. Don't be put off by Jeremy
         | Clarkson and his persona, seeing a motorhead with a big ego
         | trying to run a farm and make a profit is what makes the show.
         | Thankfully, he's paired with someone that knows their stuff,
         | with a sharp enough wit...
        
           | _benj wrote:
           | Just started watching it and it's great and hilarious! I
           | guess one of the things that I'm enjoying a ton is that I
           | also don't know anything about farming so I'm as surprised at
           | Clarkson is. It's humbling (seems for Clarkson too) to see
           | that I don't know everything...
        
         | jppope wrote:
         | perhaps one of the finest shows since streaming became a thing
        
           | philjohn wrote:
           | It really is - because not only is it hilarious, it also
           | highlights just how difficult modern farming has become -
           | razor thin margins, at the whims of the weather, dealing with
           | vandlism from local youths with nothing better to do etc.
           | etc.
        
             | toast0 wrote:
             | When was farming not on razor thin margins at the whims of
             | the weather? At least US history is full of sharecropping
             | where the farmers barely making ends meet and those with
             | enough capital to own their own small farms not doing much
             | better. Some of those who owned a lot of land with
             | sharecroppers managed to do ok though. It's similar today,
             | except sharecropping has gone out of style, I think. Big
             | farms and little farms are on very thin margins, but thin
             | margins on a small farm mean Clarkson made like a hundred
             | pounds or something after a year (probably ignoring his
             | capital costs).
        
       | twawaaay wrote:
       | My parents had goats.
       | 
       | The problem with goats for your nice landscape is that they will
       | nibble at everything including your trees and any shrubbery.
        
       | Animats wrote:
       | The list of services is blank.
       | 
       | I've often seen this done. The Hetch Hetchy pipeline operator
       | uses it to clean up their right of way, which goes up, down, and
       | through hills. Someone puts up a temporary electric fence around
       | the right of way, and they truck in about a hundred goats. The
       | goats graze everything down to bare dirt, and are then moved on
       | to the next section.
       | 
       | I've seen this done with sheep, too. Those are easier to herd but
       | not as agile on rough terrain.
        
         | drusepth wrote:
         | > The list of services is blank.
         | 
         | If you're talking about the Listings page, it'll probably
         | display as blank if you have Javascript disabled. It loads a
         | rather large accordion list per-state after the page loads.
        
           | Animats wrote:
           | AH. I have "powr.io"'s spammy tracking widgets blocked.
        
       | bluelightning2k wrote:
       | I am waiting for GaaS
        
       | AndyMcConachie wrote:
       | The city of Rotterdam has sheep that are owned by the city and
       | shepherded by a city employee.
       | 
       | https://www.rotterdam.nl/wonen-leven/grazers/
       | 
       | I'm kind of surprised someone would use goats for this purpose
       | instead of sheep. Sheep are dumb, docile and easy to manage.
       | Goats are impossible to manage.
        
         | Xylakant wrote:
         | Goats and sheep have different grazing behavior. Sheep are
         | great for grasses, but goats will happily eat everything-
         | shrubs, grass, name it.
        
       | phkahler wrote:
       | The map got all jittery on me and would not stop. All I did is
       | scroll down the page. Running some version of Edge on Windows 10.
        
       | [deleted]
        
       | eminence32 wrote:
       | My office landlords hired some goats (not from this company) to
       | tame some overgrown bushes by a river. They arrived in a gutted
       | school bus (which is where they slept over night). As far as I
       | could tell, the procedure is: set up fence around area to be
       | eaten, let out goats, and let them wander and eat for a few days.
       | The end result wasn't very pretty, but it was remarkably
       | effective.
        
         | qbasic_forever wrote:
         | From the perspective of the goats it must feel like they're on
         | a luxury cruise. They get whisked around to new locations every
         | day, they get out and gorge themselves on food, then back on
         | board to the next location and plant buffet tomorrow. Nice
         | lifestyle!
        
         | type0 wrote:
         | > to tame some overgrown bushes by a river.
         | 
         | Hiring goats is one of the best methods to fight bush growth,
         | especially if you clamp the high ones so the goats can reach
         | everywhere. Sawing down on the other hand only gives more
         | sprouts and stronger roots for the next years.
        
       | LAC-Tech wrote:
       | I have my chromium browser window at half screen width - the map
       | rapidly resizes itself in a busy loop. Makes you a bit nauseous
       | to look at it.
        
         | owlninja wrote:
         | Same for me at full screen. Fascinating service though!
        
           | AdamJacobMuller wrote:
           | They're better at goats than web design.
        
         | [deleted]
        
         | probably_wrong wrote:
         | Firefox too - a scroll bar appears and disappears in a loop
         | until it eventually converges and stops.
        
         | yreg wrote:
         | Yep, the map is funky!
        
       | schainks wrote:
       | Tried hiring a local goat rental to tame my parents' yard, the
       | guy on the phone complained about "this thing called a living
       | wage" that he has to pay his workers. He won't take jobs less
       | than 10 acres or his business runs at a loss. Many cities need
       | regular plant clearing, though, so by reliably selling services
       | to local city and county governments, his business will never
       | fail.
        
         | ryanianian wrote:
         | > reliably selling services to local city and county
         | governments
         | 
         | And cities are starting to do this more regularly too. E.g.
         | NYC's Riverside park was cleared with goats this year.
         | (https://www.reuters.com/world/us/goats-released-new-york-
         | cit...)
        
       | dlgeek wrote:
       | I looked into this a couple of times for an urban-ish lot with an
       | overgrown backyard. (I don't have a green thumb!). There were
       | several services in my area, including the awesomely-named Rent-
       | a-ruminant.
       | 
       | Unfortunately, for smaller lots, it just isn't feasible - the way
       | the pricing is structured, the setup fees get you. They are
       | really for multi-acre lots where they set up significant fencing
       | and leave the goats for several days.
        
         | semi-extrinsic wrote:
         | Here in Northern Europe they just use GPS-enabled electric
         | collars on the goats, and do literal geofencing with that. Then
         | you don't have any cost of setting up physical fences. Of
         | course you have to accept that the fence position has an
         | inaccuracy 5-6 meters, so it only makes sense for large areas
         | where there is nothing that will kill the goat if it strays a
         | little outside the fence.
        
           | Aperocky wrote:
           | What if the goat wanders into the wrong direction and get
           | lost? Would it die of electric shock or would the collar run
           | out of battery.. eventually
        
       | mingusrude wrote:
       | My sister has a small farm and in addition to cows and horses she
       | also has rabbits. Every spring, parents show up to buy a rabbit
       | to have at home. When the deal is done my sister takes the
       | parents aside and tell them that if they plan or feel by the end
       | of the summer that they want to let the rabbit loose, they can
       | return it for free.
       | 
       | What she does not tell is that our brother-in-law is a chef and
       | happily makes rabbit stew of the returned rabbits. If there was
       | ever a win-win situation, this is it.
        
         | cornel_io wrote:
        
         | dunefox wrote:
         | Yeah, sounds like a win-win situation alright - the pet rabbit
         | gets slaughtered, the children and parents are lied to. Your
         | sister sounds like a great person.
        
           | freilanzer wrote:
           | Agreed, that seems rather questionable.
        
           | wszfahwbwbaha wrote:
           | It's seriously skeezy. One of those comments that makes me
           | have less faith in humanity.
        
         | wszfahwbwbaha wrote:
         | Your sister is a bad person
        
         | mtlmtlmtlmtl wrote:
         | What kind of people adopt a pet, and then release it into the
         | wild? People doing this with cats is one of the reasons stray
         | cats are such a big problem in many places. People dumping cat
         | litters in the woods and what not. And rabbits can be an
         | ecological menace too if allowed to multiply, which they do
         | _like rabbits_.
        
           | vrc wrote:
           | Fish and turtles immediately come to mind. I knew of somebody
           | who released Siberian dwarf hamsters and for a brief period
           | they multiplied in their backyard before the local red tailed
           | hawk caught wind
        
             | kennend3 wrote:
             | This!
             | 
             | where i live there are wild rabbits and in previous years
             | the population has literally exploded.
             | 
             | The Rabbits are smart, they build a den under my deck
             | knowing the dog cant reach them and the dog keeps other
             | predators away.
             | 
             | Then a red tailed fox moved into the area... and now
             | instead of finding whole rabbits roaming the neighbourhood,
             | you find the odd rabbit component. Maybe a rear quarter
             | here, or a front limb there.
        
           | inkcapmushroom wrote:
           | >What kind of people adopt a pet, and then release it into
           | the wild?
           | 
           | I have a friend who just acquired a ball python because the
           | frat house behind her left the snake tank, with the snake
           | inside it, out with the trash can. Many people have no regard
           | for animals and even less regard for their impact on the
           | world around them.
        
           | drjasonharrison wrote:
           | Goldfish, turtles, snakes, lizards, rabbits, etc are all
           | animals people bought for pets and then decided that they
           | didn't want them and released them into the "wild" to be
           | "free" without considering the consequences for the animal or
           | the environment.
        
           | arcanemachined wrote:
           | > What kind of people adopt a pet, and then release it into
           | the wild?
           | 
           | Have you seen how much litter people throw on the ground? I
           | think you might be giving the average person too much credit.
        
             | mtlmtlmtlmtl wrote:
             | I'm not talking about cat litter I'm talking about litters
             | of kittens. Who gives a fuck about litter?
             | 
             | Unless you're talking about litter as in garbage.
             | 
             | But if you think dumping helpless animals under your care
             | to fend for themselves is morally equivalent to littering,
             | I'm not even sure what to say to that. It's not even in the
             | same ballpark.
        
               | yjftsjthsd-h wrote:
               | I'm fairly confident that they meant garbage, yes.
               | 
               | Without commenting on the amount of badness, the point is
               | that they're both bad things that people nonetheless
               | manage to regularly do.
        
               | mtlmtlmtlmtl wrote:
               | I know commenting on downvotes isn't kosher but I really
               | wish downvoters would leave a comment on why. It could be
               | 3 words: downvoted for x.
               | 
               | I'm really not sure what is so objectionable about
               | asserting that animal abuse is not the same thing as
               | littering.
        
               | dstick wrote:
               | Since you asked nicely: downvoted for using a specific
               | type of language.
               | 
               | It's the first part in the HN guidelines for comments:
               | 
               | "Be kind. Don't be snarky. Have curious conversation;
               | don't cross-examine. Please don't fulminate. Please don't
               | sneer, including at the rest of the community."
        
               | mtlmtlmtlmtl wrote:
               | Thank you. Yeah, I kind of misunderstood GGP as a
               | deliberate misinterpretation of my usage of the countable
               | noun "litter". And it ticked me off. Having grown up on
               | 4chan and IRC, I'm often a bit surprised by what's
               | considered snark on HN vs other parts of the internet.
               | I'll try to adjust my weights in future.
        
               | gommm wrote:
               | I think that animal abuse is not the same thing as
               | littering but that the type of people who litter are also
               | the same type on irresponsible people who will think that
               | leaving a rabbit to fend for themselves is no big deal.
               | Either they are clueless and think that rabbits can fend
               | for themselves or they do not care about the consequences
               | of their actions as proven by littering.
        
               | mtlmtlmtlmtl wrote:
               | Sure. But there is something very different about the
               | animal case because most normal people make emotional
               | connections with their pets.
               | 
               | I own a Norwegian forest cat he was a stray and then
               | found and neutered as an adult. I pretty much know that
               | he could survive just fine on his own by hunting rodents,
               | which he sometimes does anyway. But I still wouldn't
               | leave him to fend for himself because I know he's much
               | happier as a pet and I also just don't want him to leave.
               | That's the part I don't really get. And I'm not some
               | bleeding heart animals should have human rights type
               | person either. Even though squirrels are cute, I'm not
               | shedding tears while cleaning one up that the cat brought
               | in. It's a wild animal that got killed by a predator.
               | That's just nature.
               | 
               | I don't understand the emotional calculus of doing thing
               | to an animal you've lived with and taken care of for
               | months. And I really don't think _that_ is normal at all.
        
               | slingnow wrote:
               | I'm really glad people don't leave comments for
               | downvoting. Then this forum would be littered (heh) with
               | completely useless 3-word comments "downvoted for x".
               | 
               | Be less concerned with your internet points.
        
               | mtlmtlmtlmtl wrote:
               | It's not that I'm so conserned with my points really.
               | Just sometimes it sucks if people disapprove of what you
               | said and you're not sure why. It's usually enough if just
               | one person leaves a comment. Sometimes these things are
               | just hard for me to interpret and it frustrates me a bit.
        
               | leaflets2 wrote:
               | > if people disapprove of what you said and you're not
               | sure why
               | 
               | Good point, I've been mildly about about that me too in
               | some cases (I'm sbd else)
        
           | xbmcuser wrote:
           | A large number of invasive species in many countries are pets
           | that were released in the wild. Snakes and gold fish are
           | probably the most well known among them. Most humans are
           | selfish I think people doing the right thing in private is a
           | lot less common than people assume hence when someone does
           | something unselfish it is celebrated.
        
         | __dunder__ wrote:
         | Doesn't this produce a selection effect against cute rabbits?
         | Parents are more likely to choose cute rabbits, those rabbits
         | become pets, they either get returned and eaten or kept. So
         | non-cute rabbits tend to live longer on the farm, and as such
         | have more offspring and get selected for, and eventually the
         | farm will be covered in ugly rabbits and your sister will not
         | have any clients anymore.
        
           | oynqr wrote:
           | Ugly rabbits probably get the stew treatment first
        
         | jacobriis wrote:
         | This is not goat content.
        
         | kinleyd wrote:
         | Hmm, that does not sound right.
        
         | KingMob wrote:
         | > If there was ever a win-win situation, this is it.
         | 
         | Say what? She lies via omission to the parents, forcing them to
         | make an uninformed choice.
         | 
         | Instead of letting a rabbit loose in the wild, they might have
         | sought another home for it, because they didn't want it to die.
         | Your sister's lies mislead them into thinking they can safely
         | return the rabbit.
        
           | m1gu3l wrote:
           | The whole thing was an Invisible initiation, there was never
           | any rabbit.
        
           | schainks wrote:
           | Australia would like to have a word with you.
        
           | withinboredom wrote:
           | Letting them free will likely get them eaten anyway, probably
           | less humanly since they'll still be alive while they are
           | eaten. Or run over. These are domesticated rabbits, not wild
           | ones.
        
             | wikfwikf wrote:
             | Would you rather be released from prison into a dangerous
             | world or executed?
        
               | skinnymuch wrote:
               | People aren't domesticated rabbits.
        
               | withinboredom wrote:
               | These are not wild rabbits.
               | 
               | You cannot release them into the wild, just like you
               | can't release penguins from the zoo into the wild. We
               | spend most of our adult life teaching our children how to
               | survive. Most people don't teach their pets how to
               | survive.
               | 
               | No offense, but your question makes no sense in the scope
               | we are dealing with. But fwiw, most people released from
               | prison don't do so well with reintegration. Some don't
               | survive, some end up going back, and very few thrive.
        
             | StrictDabbler wrote:
             | My experience is that you don't let a rabbit go... you just
             | stop trying to track the little lagomorph down after it
             | chews through or digs under the fence for the third time.
             | 
             | Rabbits are good as prey, great as pests, bad as pets.
        
             | pluijzer wrote:
             | What the parent post means is that the owners might not
             | have let the rabbit free bit would find an other
             | alternative, like keeping the rabbit anyway because they
             | love it, giving the rabbit to a friend etc. But now they
             | think their is this great alternative of giving the rabbit
             | back but unknowingly killing it.
        
               | withinboredom wrote:
               | I've had several friends have rabbits in my lifetime.
               | They all t eventually let them go instead of finding a
               | new home. Each time I looked at them in horror while I
               | imagined the lucky hawk having dinner.
               | 
               | Most people think rabbits are "natural" when they may
               | actually be invasive. So they let them go. Finding a new
               | home is the last thing on every one of these owners mind.
        
               | mtlmtlmtlmtl wrote:
               | I could never imagine doing this to an animal I care
               | about. This is sociopathic behaviour. Unless they believe
               | the rabbit will survive, in which it's just wildly
               | ignorant. And therefore irresponsible, because a rabbit
               | owner should have a rough understanding of what a rabbit
               | is and how they work.
        
               | withinboredom wrote:
               | It is quite sad and irresponsible, but extremely common.
        
               | mtlmtlmtlmtl wrote:
               | There was a case here in Norway a few years back. A
               | litter of dead kittens was found in the woods, wrapped in
               | several layers of plastic bags. Inner layers had
               | scratches proving the kittens were alive and not
               | stillborn.
        
               | throwaway2037 wrote:
               | Hongkong has a _modest_ social problem related to freeing
               | unwanted pets into the wild. There are numerous
               | billboards and buses adverts warning people not to do it.
               | 
               | On the other hand, there is very real urban legend of a
               | salt water crocodile that was captured in early 2000s in
               | the Hongkong wild. It was hunted for months. Authorities
               | have no idea if was a release, or travelled from nearby
               | (more tropical) region. Read more about Pui Pui on Wiki:
               | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pui_Pui_(crocodile) She is
               | even on show at the Hongkong Wetland Park. But if you
               | want to see salties in the wild without too much effort
               | or stress, you can do that in Singapore at a wetland
               | reserve near Kranji.
        
               | wikfwikf wrote:
               | These are two contradictory reasons. Rabbits are
               | considered invasive because there is a non-zero chance
               | they will escape the hawk and reproduce.
        
               | samatman wrote:
               | It's not contradictory in the slightest, the odds of a
               | domesticated and domestic rabbit surviving predation are
               | effectively nil.
               | 
               | The odds that it manages a litter first are higher,
               | especially if it escapes pregnant, which rabbits
               | generally are if they're able to be. Those pups are
               | feral, not domestic, and have moderately better odds.
               | Given enough generations, the domesticated neoteny is
               | selected out by predation and now you have an invasive
               | population of feral rabbits which can survive in the
               | wild.
        
               | wikfwikf wrote:
               | Everyone dies eventually.
        
               | samatman wrote:
               | Yes, but not of predation. The number of rabbits which
               | die of age or starvation in their burrows over the
               | winter, or disease, is not zero.
        
               | [deleted]
        
           | samatman wrote:
           | They can, in fact, safely return the rabbit to the stew pot.
           | 
           | They're food. Rabbits. People eat them.
           | 
           | It's not better for the rabbit to be turned loose to be
           | mauled to death by a housecat or eaten by a coyote. A shelter
           | is going to euthanize, wasting good meat.
           | 
           | This is squeamishness masquerading as morality.
        
             | gambiting wrote:
             | That's not the point. I have literally nothing against
             | eating rabbits - they are delicious in fact.
             | 
             | I do hover, object to lying. Like OP said - they(everyone
             | in fact) have the right to make an informed choice. By
             | omitting this information, people who are returning a
             | rabbit aren't making an informed choice. It's a trick, a
             | ruse, if money was involved I'd call it a fraud.
             | 
             | Nothing to do with squeamishness.
        
               | conorcleary wrote:
               | They're returning the rabbits to the previous owners.
               | There's no further expectation of duty to either party.
        
               | dnadler wrote:
               | The situation implies that the person selling the rabbits
               | as pets would attempt to rehome them or care for them as
               | pets.
               | 
               | There's a difference between being technically correct,
               | and being moral. While the language used is technically
               | correct for the situation, omitting the information about
               | where the rabbits end up is immoral.
               | 
               | Clearly OP understands that if the whole truth was told,
               | they wouldn't be getting a free source of rabbit meat...
        
               | spelunker wrote:
               | I would hardly call it immoral. If the owners are curious
               | about the ultimate fate of the rabbit, they could simply
               | ask before returning.
        
               | leaflets2 wrote:
               | I think it doesn't occur to them that the rabbit's new
               | home is in the oven. They wouldn't think about asking
        
               | samatman wrote:
               | Is it dishonest to buy a rabbit and not mention that
               | you're planning to eat/breed/keep it as a pet?
               | 
               | No of course not, it's none of the seller's business. If
               | they say "hey we're vegan please don't eat our rabbits"
               | that's a different matter, it would be at the very least
               | polite to respect those wishes.
               | 
               | Why on Earth would returning a rabbit _to a farm where
               | they eat them_ be any different? In this case the
               | possibility is perfectly clear.
        
               | dnadler wrote:
               | I think the bit about it being a "farm where they eat
               | them" is the key point.
               | 
               | If the person returning it knows that, then sure. The OP
               | implied pretty heavily that they don't know the ultimate
               | fate of the rabbits.
               | 
               | As far as these people know its "A farm where they sell
               | breed and sell rabbits as pets", not a farm that raises
               | them for meat.
        
               | jeromegv wrote:
               | I think the expectation is that since they bought the
               | rabbit there and the rabbit was happily living there,
               | when they return it, they expect it to still live. They
               | think they are returning the rabbit to its "natural"
               | environment and will happily live on the farm.
               | 
               | So there is no legal duty or obligation, but morally, the
               | expectation on both parties are definitely not the same.
               | Otherwise they would tell them that they would cook them
               | when they return them. The fact they are hiding this
               | information shows that expectations are not aligned.
        
               | scrumbledober wrote:
               | Yeah but it's a farm... it's not a rabbit rescue and pet
               | store
        
               | slingnow wrote:
               | Did you miss the part where the sister says "that [if]
               | they want to let the rabbit loose, they can return it for
               | free"?
               | 
               | That's an outright lie, since they aren't letting the
               | rabbit loose to live on the farm -- they're eating it.
        
             | wszfahwbwbaha wrote:
             | What is with all your edgelord stuff with rabbits. You need
             | to work out some of your issues
        
             | spywaregorilla wrote:
             | Are dogs food?
        
               | kennend3 wrote:
               | I've had dogs as pets for decades. I don't see why people
               | cant eat them if they want to. I wouldn't eat my dog
               | because of emotional attachments, but that doesn't mean
               | that others who don't have emotional ties cant eat them.
        
               | spywaregorilla wrote:
               | But perhaps you can see why someone would be upset if you
               | needed to pass your dog to someone else's care; and they
               | ate them.
        
               | [deleted]
        
               | samatman wrote:
               | Are pigs food to Muslims?
               | 
               | Is there a culture where eating rabbit is taboo?
        
               | spywaregorilla wrote:
               | You said
               | 
               | > They're food. Rabbits. People eat them.
               | 
               | Well people eat dogs and pigs so then by the same logic
               | they are food.
        
           | lostlogin wrote:
           | Rabbits are incredibly destructive of many environments. Have
           | a look at New Zealand.
        
             | wszfahwbwbaha wrote:
             | Then don't breed them, sell them as pets, then lie to
             | parents and kill and eat them. Seems like an easy
             | solution..
        
               | lostlogin wrote:
               | This is how I've always behaved, yet the problem remains.
        
           | mechanical_bear wrote:
           | There is no lie, only assumptions on their part.
        
       | [deleted]
        
       | [deleted]
        
       | 11thEarlOfMar wrote:
       | Fantastic. I've got 1-1/4 acres that I've paid yearly to have
       | cut. I worry about the workers because they encounter
       | rattlesnakes. I've searched for goats to hire for several years,
       | but not been able to find them. Very glad to discover this!
        
         | samstave wrote:
         | Where are you?
         | 
         | A friend of mine runs "https://www.scapegoats.net/"
         | 
         | And the head of HPE Sales has something like several hundred
         | goats, but I dont know their site info.
        
           | 11thEarlOfMar wrote:
           | Alameda County, Ca.
        
       | [deleted]
        
       | frob wrote:
       | Lawrence Berkeley National Labs uses goats to tame the brush on
       | the steep slopes surrounding the campus (over 45 degrees in many
       | places). More than once I've had to wait on a bus for the herd of
       | goats to transition across the main access road from one slope to
       | the other.
        
         | AlotOfReading wrote:
         | They're pretty common in most of the East Bay hills. I've
         | always wondered how many different herds there are though. Is
         | it like 1-2 herds per city that move around constantly, or are
         | there dozens of herds that spend a week vacationing in the big
         | city every couple of months before they go back to the farm?
        
           | sdw1 wrote:
           | The East Bay Regional Park District publishes their grazing
           | schedule with all of their contractors! I really like to plan
           | trips to go see the goats.
           | https://www.ebparks.org/sites/default/files/Goat-Grazing-
           | Sch...
        
           | ketzo wrote:
           | I know there are at least two goat rental _companies_ ,
           | because the one I see on my hikes is different from the one
           | in the link!
        
         | e40 wrote:
         | And those hills are filled with poison oak. Guess it doesn't
         | bother the goats like it does humans!
        
         | redconfetti wrote:
         | When a mower won't tend to those hills.
         | 
         | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hQEFH_8fka4
        
       | PaulDavisThe1st wrote:
       | Much more detail on one of the listed goat rental companies:
       | 
       | https://www.santafenewmexican.com/news/business/local-goatsc...
        
       | gwbas1c wrote:
       | Inspiration: Ask HN: Do you maintain a list of RSS links of GOAT
       | blogs https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32191140
       | 
       | And, yes, my cousin's goat business is listed:
       | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32191666
        
       | dingleberry420 wrote:
       | You don't rent a goat, you lease that surly bastard
        
       | flerchin wrote:
       | My dad hired goats to mow down his entire lot in the Hell's
       | Canyon area of Eastern Washington. Saved his cabin from a
       | wildfire, and got the dang thistles reduced to nothing. It was a
       | bargain too, $400.
        
       | 0xPIT wrote:
       | Couldn't one also rent goats just to appear in video calls?
        
       | widowlark wrote:
       | My wife and I hired goats from a gentleman on Nextdoor to help
       | clear our backyard in our newly purchased home (like ~10000sqft
       | of overgrowth) - he dropped off 7 goats, and they performed
       | admirably, were extremely calm and well behaved until they ran
       | out of food, at which point they turn into food-hunting, petulant
       | children. If you do this, make sure to get only as many as you
       | need!
        
       | puchatek wrote:
       | The "world" seems to be made up of Canada, the US and Australia
        
         | [deleted]
        
         | ngcc_hk wrote:
         | Also New Zealand. I heard they have more goats and sheep than
         | human. Just not sure you need to rent one.
        
         | ngcc_hk wrote:
         | Also New Zealand but not their world. I heard they have more
         | goats and sheep than human. Just not sure you need to rent one.
        
       | imwillofficial wrote:
       | You had me at goat rentals!
        
       | pjmlp wrote:
       | In the same vein regarding tackling invasive plants.
       | 
       | In Germany, I came to realize that many cities have unpaid
       | "employees" to tame the city gardens, namely wild ducks, gooses
       | and rabbits.
       | 
       | Thankfully people leave them be, back home they would have been
       | snaped in less than a week.
       | 
       | However as they are used to humans, it also means they make
       | themselves invited guests to any picknick if one doesn't pay
       | attention to the "teams" taking care of the grass.
        
       | Cockbrand wrote:
       | Which reminds me of a very old joke:
       | 
       | Two friends meet in a bar.
       | 
       | Says one: "I've bought a goat."
       | 
       | Says the other: "A goat? Where do you keep it?"
       | 
       | "In the bedroom."
       | 
       | "In the bedroom? What about the smell?"
       | 
       | "Well, the critter will have to get used to it."
        
       | andybak wrote:
       | The map judders uncontrollably on Firefox for me.
        
         | codebolt wrote:
         | Same here on Edge.
        
           | moffkalast wrote:
           | Also on Chrome, I'm pretty sure it's a joke.
        
             | genezeta wrote:
             | It does look like a bug.
             | 
             | Like the iframe and the parent are sending each other a
             | message to match the heights of the content document and
             | the iframe element but it miss-calculates producing a
             | vertical scroll to appear, which then posts another message
             | back to adjust again and so on, back and forth.
        
         | MaxBarraclough wrote:
         | Same here, it constantly alternates between two sizes.
        
         | nvusuvu wrote:
         | Same here, Version 104.0.5112.81 (Official Build) (64-bit)
         | Chrome
        
       | Joel_Mckay wrote:
       | Goats are the future of transportation.
        
         | implements wrote:
         | In Britain, because they're classed as farm animals you'd need
         | a Movement Order from DEFRA (Department for Environment, Food
         | and Rural Affairs) to take one onto a public road,
         | unfortunately.
         | 
         | https://www.gov.uk/guidance/sheep-and-goat-keepers-how-to-re...
         | 
         | (Yeah, I'd once looked into using a 'goat and cart' as a from
         | of transport!)
        
         | adrianN wrote:
         | Thor knew best all along!
        
       | d_rc wrote:
       | Another story from a fellow hacker with a backyard goat - It
       | actually starts in a very subtle way. Goats have different tastes
       | and moods, and it's not like they eat everything right away
       | unless the density of a goat per backyard m2 is too high. I
       | started giving mine some free "roaming" time with the chickens
       | every day before the sunset. It looked very innocent - first few
       | days she ate just some weeds, nettle and some low hanging
       | branches of pear trees. No worries, I was planning to cut those
       | anyways. After few weeks of not paying that much attention in the
       | evenings, bottom third of all our ~12 trees were gone, she got
       | into salads, potatoes, zucchini, pumpkins, peppers and cucumbers,
       | all nettle was done, and she started checking out tomatoes (which
       | seemed that she is really really not into at first). I am
       | building a new goat house with it's own separate "backyard" with
       | weeds that she won't be able to escape. :)
        
         | h2odragon wrote:
         | > won't be able to escape
         | 
         | I suspect you may be falling to overconfidence there.
         | 
         | Also, single goat? That's tough, I've done it by running the
         | goat with a pack of dogs and treating it as a dog, but witha
         | lone goat, who doesn't feel they have herd, keeping them happy
         | is difficult.
        
         | toast0 wrote:
         | FYI, we were letting our goats and chickens roam at the same
         | time, but hanging out with the goats and it was fine... until
         | the goats figured out how to squeeze into the chicken run and
         | gobble up the chicken feed.
         | 
         | Apparently they find it super tasty, but it's not vegetarian,
         | so they shouldn't eat it. The chickens get into much less
         | trouble and can roam mostly unsupervised; but we've got a lot
         | of aerial preditors to watch out for.
        
         | Jedd wrote:
         | Do you mean the goat is eating the tomato fruit, or the tomato
         | leaves?
         | 
         | The latter are toxic to (AIUI) all monogastrics, same as
         | potatoes and other Solanum family plants - you may want to
         | reign that behaviour in, assuming the animals are still alive.
        
           | soperj wrote:
           | Goats are ruminants.
        
         | stefs wrote:
         | at least she didn't eat the chicks.
        
           | ridgered4 wrote:
           | When I was a child we had pigs and chickens next to each
           | other. The chickens started sleeping atop the resting pig
           | since it was warm. It was cute until the pig started
           | devouring the chickens!
        
       | [deleted]
        
       | walrus01 wrote:
       | in terms of goat's ability to eat almost literally anything, even
       | the things you don't want them to eat, they have a saying in
       | afghanistan (translated from the dari):
       | 
       | if you don't have any problems, buy a goat
        
       | [deleted]
        
       | ericcholis wrote:
       | We've got a service in Western New York (letsgoatbuffalo.com,
       | clever play on Let's Go Buffalo!). They used an old school bus to
       | transport the goats, which sadly burned down. But, the Western
       | New York community raised $16,000 via a go fund me for a new bus!
        
         | bleuchase wrote:
         | Same service OP is talking about?
         | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32434474
        
       | elliottkember wrote:
       | Goatscaping
        
       | lwhi wrote:
       | https://www.cronkshawfoldfarm.co.uk/goatsonzoom
       | 
       | You're welcome!
        
       | soledades wrote:
       | ( deg [?]? deg)
        
         | zbird wrote:
         | I know where you're coming from.
        
       | lostlogin wrote:
       | I've rented bees, I would like to try a goat. Last one I met was
       | great, but some are complete arseholes.
        
         | sverhagen wrote:
         | Goats' honey just ain't that good...
        
           | ben_w wrote:
           | Bee milk is extremely spicy, but each bee can only be milked
           | once and doesn't produce very much.
        
             | lostlogin wrote:
             | You can harvest venom and it's worth quite a lot.
             | 
             | It does seem a bit like bee torture though.
        
         | imgabe wrote:
         | With goats and bees you could be living in the land of milk and
         | honey.
        
       | voxadam wrote:
       | Goat Ops[0] is real!
       | 
       | [0] https://www.goatops.com/
        
       | gumby wrote:
       | Less than three weeks ago, goats as a service was a topic of
       | discussion on HN: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32191140
       | 
       | (A nice example of comments drifting away from the putative
       | topic)
        
       | sAbakumoff wrote:
       | When I saw the title, I thought that it's about hiring The
       | Greatest Of All Times people. LMAO
        
       | omnibrain wrote:
       | At my former working place we had a freelance consultant on
       | retainer who looked into cutting his hours down for health
       | reasons and thus explored new ventures. Because he already had a
       | few sheep he decided to offer sheep rentals as a "biological"
       | lawn cutter.
       | 
       | But there were 2 problems: Sheep can be somewhat picky eaters, so
       | they let some grass stand. But the bigger problem was, that while
       | his prospective customers liked the idea of having their lawn cut
       | "biologically", they pretty much did not like the sheep droppings
       | the sheep left behind in practice.
        
       | rootw0rm wrote:
       | I have property in a pretty rural area (Anza, CA) and every goat
       | owner I know says that they're actually picky eaters. But these
       | articles I see pop up now and then pretty much prove the
       | opposite...
        
         | toast0 wrote:
         | I've got three goats. They're picky, but mine have a pretty
         | good amount of space and a variety of stuff to eat. They've
         | each got their favorites, but crunchy dry cottonwood leaves and
         | our dominant dandelion-alike are at the top of each list.
         | 
         | If you're using goats to clear land, you put more goats per
         | space than the land can sustain, but just for a few days or
         | weeks. The goats will eat their favorite things first, but then
         | also other paletteable stuff. They'll also trample things down
         | pretty good.
        
         | markdown wrote:
         | They will eat all the grass and then shrubs and then small
         | bushes and trees including stripping all the bark.
         | 
         | Not animals you want around flora you care about.
        
           | progre wrote:
           | Yep, my neighbours keeps goats next to my propery, they
           | escape once in a while. They go directly to the soft greens
           | in my garden. When the fences hold they eat the area clean by
           | type as you say. First the grass, then the leves of the small
           | trees, then the bark (killing the small trees). Only when
           | there is nothing else left will they eat the nettles.
        
             | k_sze wrote:
             | I'm not familiar with goats. But this got me thinking: why
             | would the goats even do that? Are they not well-fed? Are
             | they hungry all the time? Do goats eat and poop 24/7 if
             | left unchecked?
        
               | progre wrote:
               | > Do goats eat and poop 24/7 if left unchecked
               | 
               | Yes. Many grazing animals are like this. It's like they
               | have no "feeling full" in their tiny brains. Grass and
               | leafs are not very calorie dense so they kind of have to.
               | 
               | Cows or horses can easily eat themselves sick if they are
               | let into high grown grass fields. Where I live the horse
               | owners will sometimes cut the grass in the fields before
               | they let the horses go to it in the spring.
        
         | frob wrote:
         | I have goats. They are picky eaters. They know what they want
         | and what they don't. They will strip most trees and bushes to
         | the branch. They will eat most grass, but not if it's too tall
         | or has gone to seed or is too dried out. And they'll only eat
         | it down to about 3-4 inches from the ground. There are certain
         | plants I dig out of my pasture because the goats just won't eat
         | them and I don't want them spreading and taking up more space.
         | 
         | There's truth that goats will put most things in their mouths.
         | Almost every time I bring something new into their pen, they
         | check to see if it's food. They'll even check me every now and
         | then just to be sure I haven't become food in the past week.
         | So, sure, you might see a goat pick up a tin can for a brief
         | moment, but you'll also see it spit it out 5 seconds later.
        
           | mitchell_h wrote:
           | I recently got into goats. Already have cows, chickens, and
           | pigs on my hobby farm. Goats are without a doubt the most
           | picky. I use pigs and goats for pretty much the same things,
           | land clearing then food. Pigs are pure freaking destroy
           | everything and then still eat what feed you give them. They
           | also tear the crap out of the dirt, but they taste really
           | good.
           | 
           | I agree goats are picky the point that if you keep an on them
           | you can catch them before they tear up anything you want to
           | keep(apple/peach trees). Another thing is goats are just dang
           | fun. Pigs and cows are friendly in a dull sort of way, goats
           | have character & personality. One of my goats will come out
           | of his pen nightly just to hang around with me and the kids.
           | When it gets tired of us he puts him self back in the pen.
        
           | kieckerjan wrote:
           | My gf and I have a plot and are considering goats. There are
           | trees there though, full grown conifers. Will they be at
           | risk? No tree likes it to be stripped of its bark.
        
       | guiambros wrote:
       | Ha, this reminded me of a similar service: goat rental for
       | videoconferences [1] :). It was a hit during the pandemic, with
       | everyone scrambling to combat screen fatigue in creative ways.
       | 
       | [1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32435090
        
         | probably_wrong wrote:
         | I visited the goat rental page and got a picture of an Alpaca.
         | I want my money back.
        
       | flerchin wrote:
       | The map on this page has some sort of CSS issue in Firefox. It
       | constantly resizes and shakes. Using the page zoom function is
       | enough to get it to eventually stop.
        
         | pineconewarrior wrote:
         | It jiggles in a most unpleasant manner for me as well.
         | 
         | I love these types of bugs. If these guys are going for a "Goat
         | Simulator" vibe (notoriously buggy, part of the charm), they've
         | nailed it.
        
           | kraquepype wrote:
           | Ha, that was my first thought too. It immediately reminded me
           | of the absurdly buggy feeling you get playing Goat Simulator.
        
         | keyanp wrote:
         | Same issue for me, I'm on Chrome Version 104.0.5112.79
        
       | fnands wrote:
       | GaaS - Goats as a Service
        
       | jppope wrote:
       | TIL Michael Jordan nor Tom Brady are featured on hiregoats.com...
       | which is a shame
        
         | jayzalowitz wrote:
         | came here for this joke.
        
       | jaimex2 wrote:
       | So you want me to pay you to feed your goats?
        
         | gwbas1c wrote:
         | Uhm, goats are by far the cheapest way to clear out certain
         | kinds of brush and noxious plants. They're also cute and act
         | like dogs.
         | 
         | Pesticides are dangerous and still leave a dead plant, machines
         | jam (and lop off fingers,) doing it by hand takes a long time
         | and can risk major rashes from poison ivy or cuts from thorns.
         | 
         | Part of my back yard is impenetrable from the kinds of plants
         | goats eat.
        
           | strickman wrote:
           | I think he has a point there. If he did not pay for, it may
           | be an even trade.
           | 
           | You'd just have to compare the cost per acre per month of
           | machine maintenance vs the cost to maintain a well fed flock
           | for a month; including land costs and property taxes if you
           | own the land.
        
             | happyopossum wrote:
             | > I think he has a point there. If he did not pay for, it
             | may be an even trade.
             | 
             | Not really - the cost of food for goats is fairly marginal
             | all things considered. For this kind of service you have to
             | account for transport, setup (usually fencing of some sort
             | has to be put up), etc. as well as ongoing medical and
             | shelter costs for when they aren't working.
        
           | jaimex2 wrote:
           | There's going to be poop everywhere and potential damage if
           | they aren't confined. They'll climb and gnaw on everything
           | and anything. The goats will be spreading the weed seeds.
           | 
           | I'm not saying they are bad, I'm just saying you're being a
           | schmuck if you pay someone to have their goats graze on your
           | land.
           | 
           | Get your own grazers or let them do it for free.
        
           | bobthepanda wrote:
           | Also, goats deal really well with sloped areas that machines
           | and people struggle with.
           | 
           | Where I live they get used a lot on highway embankments.
        
             | jaimex2 wrote:
             | Electric mowers and brush cutters solved that years ago.
             | They weigh nothing.
        
               | kennend3 wrote:
               | So...
               | 
               | You prefer two stroke gasoline engines (Very
               | environmentally unfriendly) vs goats because???
               | 
               | I've never seen city employees using "electric mowers"???
               | Probably because the battery life is simply useless for
               | anything beyond a small yard?
               | 
               | On top of this, you prefer to pay unionized city worker
               | wages to remove weeds instead of an environmentally
               | friendly goat do it for almost nothing?
               | 
               | I saw 2 city workers trying to clear an area the other
               | day. 3 hours later they were still there, gasoline
               | burning trimmers screaming away. I'd say they had at lest
               | a day of work left. Two workers, there all day - probably
               | a few tanks of gas as well...
               | 
               | Personally, i'd prefer they had Goats as an option.. but
               | that is just me.
        
               | bobthepanda wrote:
               | You still need to operate one with a human, and goats
               | don't have a minimum wage.
               | 
               | (Also, because their method of destruction is eating,
               | they also go for root systems and clear them whole; this
               | is a very important feature in my area, as they're used
               | to kill blackberry, which does not die if you leave the
               | roots.)
        
       | djmips wrote:
       | I thought this would let you would hire 10X programmers...
        
       | chris_wot wrote:
       | If you think about it, this is probably the most ecologically
       | friend method of clearing scrub and weeds. No chemicals involved!
       | 
       | The only thing I wonder about is whether the weed seeds would
       | regrow. But I'd imagine clearing it on the second round would be
       | easier.
        
       | ggm wrote:
       | I thought we were opposed to the Nanny state?
        
       | dont__panic wrote:
       | No goats in New Hampshire or Vermont? I guess those farms don't
       | have internet access...
        
         | [deleted]
        
       | vishnugupta wrote:
       | Ah nice seeing something like this on HN. In India, it's common
       | to hire goats for another, lets just say complementary reason.
       | Their droppings are really good natural fertiliser. So farmers
       | pay sheep/goat herders to get them to visit their farm for a few
       | days before the sowing season.
        
         | fluke53 wrote:
         | I'm from India and I never heard of this.
         | 
         | I'm pretty sure people do this, but it's the "it's common" part
         | that bothers me.
         | 
         | It's like saying Indians are vegetarians. All Indians aren't.
        
           | showerst wrote:
           | Whenever I hear someone say "(X) is common" in any country
           | with more than about 20 million people, I just mentally
           | append "in my area".
        
       | a_t48 wrote:
       | I looked into this for my yard. Unfortunately given how bad of a
       | shape it is, it still would cost multiple thousands to clear with
       | goats. Fortunately, it only costs a few hundred to buy some goats
       | and do it over a longer time, with the bonus of making my niece
       | happy.
        
       | yesilyurt wrote:
       | Where to hire tyson
        
       | CPLX wrote:
       | Does anyone know how much this tends to cost in an actual direct
       | X goats for X days tends to cost about this much sort of way?
        
       | samstave wrote:
       | The head of HPE EMEA is married to the head of Palo Alto networks
       | EMA sales...
       | 
       | They have an amazing home in Auburn, and they have a LOT of
       | goats. My friend, who is married to the ex chief of staff for
       | Cisco also bought a ranch in auburn and they have ~100 goats or
       | so. They rent them out for ~$800 per acre to clear bramble and
       | what not. I spent a week helping them move goats between projects
       | earlier this summer and its a hell of a lot of work.
       | 
       | There are a lot of tech people that went and bought land with
       | goats and have started goat businesses.
        
       | klik99 wrote:
       | This has become pretty common over the last few years in Atlanta
       | for clearing out larger wild areas - they make short work of it
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2022-08-12 23:01 UTC)