[HN Gopher] Hacking the Hedonic Treadmill
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Hacking the Hedonic Treadmill
        
       Author : highfrequency
       Score  : 211 points
       Date   : 2022-08-10 17:12 UTC (2 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (experimentalhistory.substack.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (experimentalhistory.substack.com)
        
       | trellad wrote:
       | Anna Lembke's "Dopamine Nation" has a lot of interesting takes on
       | the subject. One takeaway I got is that dopamine seeks a balance.
       | Opting for pleasure seeking often ends up getting experienced as
       | pain. An example of that is drug tolerance. Oddly, the reverse is
       | also true: seeking pain can often lead to an experience of
       | pleasure. The invigorated feeling after a cold shower, or how
       | hard exercise leads to highs.
       | 
       | She is a great podcast guest, too. Her approach - that the people
       | with the strongest addictions can tell us a lot about how we seek
       | pleasure - has a lot of depth to it.
        
         | isolli wrote:
         | A book developing similar ideas: The Hacking of the American
         | Mind.
         | 
         | https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/34237719-the-hacking-of-...
        
         | andrei_says_ wrote:
         | Any interviews or talks you can recommend where she covers the
         | important points of her work?
        
           | luismmolina wrote:
           | The podcast of Joe Rogan, episode #1708. Interesting
           | interview, he finds some holes in her theory that she is not
           | able to answer or can't explain. I was very excited with the
           | book before listening, but after it I was kind of
           | disappointed with the book.
        
             | andrei_says_ wrote:
             | Thank you - I've noticed that a lot of US pop-sci books
             | have a significant amount of filler.
             | 
             | What caused your disappointment?
        
           | lee wrote:
           | Dr. Huberman had her on his podcast. She dives into a lot of
           | her work.
           | 
           | https://hubermanlab.com/dr-anna-lembke-understanding-and-
           | tre...
        
             | trellad wrote:
             | Yeah, this one was the one that made me buy her book.
             | Huberman is a little much for me, but he does a great
             | interview with her. He leaves a huge topic out -- wanted to
             | examine his own workaholism -- but she's terrific.
        
         | chownie wrote:
         | Are exercise highs real? Do all people experience them or is it
         | a genetic niche?
         | 
         | I've tried a bunch of different exercise methods. Gone running,
         | swimming, weightlifting etc and I've never experienced anything
         | close to a high afterward. I'll be tired, sometimes I'll feel
         | proud of breaking a personal record but there's never any
         | physical positive sensation or euphoria to me that would
         | resemble the "runners high" that people often refer to. I think
         | I'd exercise much more consistently if there were any
         | biological feedback mechanism to make me want to rather than
         | doing it the way I do, like it's a chore.
         | 
         | The closest thing I can compare would get the transformation of
         | anxiety into excitement from getting a piercing but even that's
         | super short lasting, maybe five to fifteen minutes of shaky
         | internal excitement followed by a quick regression to baseline.
        
           | sophacles wrote:
           | The exercise high is subtle, it's not a high like smoking a
           | bunch of pot or getting drunk, rather it's a pleasant
           | feeling. The first time i really understood it was: I had
           | been doing regular running + weights for several months. Then
           | for the holidays I was travelling and visiting people and
           | didn't have a chance to exercise. After a few days I just
           | felt this building of energy that had nowhere to go - my body
           | had become used to regular exercise. About 10 days after my
           | last real workout and 4 days since any activity involving
           | physical exertion my plane landed and I checked into a hotel
           | that had a gym. I dumped my bags and went to the gym and got
           | on a treadmill thinking "finally i can burn off some of this
           | energy and anxiety from it".
           | 
           | On that run as I warmed up I felt a giant release. And I felt
           | happy... no giddy. And it was good. A few miles later I felt
           | peace and then ran some more til I felt tired.
           | 
           | It's different than just putting some stuff in your nose and
           | feeling good or popping a pill and seeing bright colors.
           | 
           | That's the most intense I ever felt it, but it was a good
           | experience because it also helped me understand what it was,
           | and I notice it often now - not every time I work out, but
           | often - its there under the tired, post work-out let-down as
           | sort of a "glow".
        
           | Filligree wrote:
           | > Are exercise highs real? Do all people experience them or
           | is it a genetic niche?
           | 
           | They're real, but (probably, usually) not literal. Exercise
           | just leaves me feeling good, all over. If you've had the
           | feeling, you'll know what I mean.
           | 
           | Some people don't seem to get it at all. And some probably do
           | experience a literal high; if the dial can be dialed all the
           | way down, I'm sure it can go to 11 as well. It's unfortunate
           | if you're in the first group, of course.
           | 
           | I don't get it very strongly myself, but I compensate by
           | making the exercise itself enjoyable. Swimming is _boring_.
           | Spend a few hours hiking across a mountain ridge -- that 's
           | anything but boring. Still tiring, but the views are worth
           | it, and it's a great place for lunch.
        
           | tepitoperrito wrote:
           | If they are, in my experience they seem to be mediated by the
           | endocannabinoid system and not primarily opiod release due to
           | trauma and adrenaline.
           | 
           | The only times I've felt it were on the tail end of cross
           | country meets (a 5k race pace) and it was quite nice. Kind of
           | an electric Bliss in your whole body. Borderline arousing at
           | the risk of oversharing lol.
        
           | thenerdhead wrote:
           | I never experienced a runner's high or a basketball "lock in"
           | until I did it enough.
           | 
           | I had to build the endurance to go over 6 miles without
           | stopping to experience my first runner's high.
           | 
           | I had to last a whole half in a basketball league to
           | experience being in the zone.
           | 
           | It took me a couple years to even get the feeling, but now
           | that I've experienced it, I can't stop doing it. I think
           | there's a personalized threshold for everyone, but for me, it
           | was pushing myself quite far beyond my limits.
        
           | RajT88 wrote:
           | > Are exercise highs real? Do all people experience them or
           | is it a genetic niche?
           | 
           | I've known many people who have experienced Runner's High. I
           | am not one of them, despite having run probably close to 10k
           | miles in my life. Marathons, Ragnar ultras, stuff like that.
           | 
           | Might be genetic, or I might be doing it wrong. FWIW, I've
           | also never hit "The Wall".
        
           | 14 wrote:
           | I've not experienced what I would call a high but after a
           | good workout and feeling the muscle pump as they call it felt
           | awesome. Your muscles bulge so hard it's just a great
           | feeling. But I never though of it as a high.
        
           | BrainsPachanga wrote:
           | I don't exercise a lot but when I play tennis and I am happen
           | to be pushing to my limits (2 hrs, no breaks almost), there
           | is a point when I get a sudden rush of pleasure for about a
           | minute when I get a lot of goosebumps. Afterwards, I am in
           | such a good mood and feel like I can push for a little bit
           | more before being totally done. I am not sure if something
           | like this is what people refer to as exercise highs?
        
           | vorpalhex wrote:
           | I did not experience a runners high until I was running 5k+.
           | 
           | I do experience a workout high from lifting pretty regulary,
           | unless it's a low weight week.
        
           | SketchySeaBeast wrote:
           | I swear it must be a unique to the individual. I've been
           | running for a few years now and have completed a few half
           | marathons (still working to get to the full) and I have never
           | once felt any sort of "high".
        
           | chrisfosterelli wrote:
           | I do a lot of running and a few times a year in my training
           | there's a run where everything just lines up perfectly. I'll
           | be well rested, focused, got some pretty scenery to look at,
           | and moving fast with what feels like pretty low relative
           | effort. Those moments definitely capture a lot of the joy of
           | running for me, but if I was doing all my training just to
           | chase them it probably wouldn't be worth it. A lot of the
           | time it's in races but not always.
           | 
           | Separately, I usually feel pretty good after a run too. Some
           | workouts I feel absolutely wrecked after, but most workouts,
           | once you have a good fitness base, you feel pretty good
           | after.
           | 
           | I'm not sure which of those, if either, are a 'runners high',
           | but most runners I know have moments more like those than
           | like an actual high.
        
           | mantas wrote:
           | Runners high is definitely real. But it takes prolonged
           | effort. For me, 1h of steady non-stop running or 3h of no-
           | rests cycling is bare minimum. 2x that for the true high
        
           | dgs_sgd wrote:
           | From personal experience I believe the "runner's high" is
           | very real. It didn't happen often, but sometimes 40-60
           | minutes in to a long run I would enter a state of flow and
           | euphoria. It felt like I was effortlessly gliding across the
           | ground and would last for as long as I kept running and a
           | short time afterward.
        
           | tdumitrescu wrote:
           | I've been exercising quite regularly for decades, including a
           | good amount of running alongside weights and other resistance
           | and cardio. I love it, and hope I don't ever have to stop,
           | but I've never experienced any sort of "runner's high" or big
           | reaction to exercise, even after very hard or long workouts.
        
           | mewse-hn wrote:
           | > Are exercise highs real? Do all people experience them or
           | is it a genetic niche?
           | 
           | I think peoples descriptions of exercise highs are overblown
           | in general. When I was training hard I'd feel pleasantly worn
           | out afterwards and would certainly agree that I got the
           | endorphins flowing.
        
             | layla5alive wrote:
             | People are actually different. Just because you don't
             | experience the actual euphoria I do doesn't lead me to
             | assume you're making it up that you don't. Those of us
             | describing it that way aren't exaggerating.
        
       | RandomLensman wrote:
       | Not directly on the treadmill, but removing things that regularly
       | create unhappiness really creates lasting uplift. There is no
       | adjustment that brings back proper misery again.
        
       | akimball wrote:
       | Subtitle: The case for wire-heading.
        
       | b3lvedere wrote:
       | "Commercial breaks--people actually enjoy TV more with
       | commercials". Maybe most people, but i hate forced commercials. I
       | rather pause the video, do something else for a while and resume
       | the video.
       | 
       | "Setpiece escape room experiences, like climbing into a coffin "
       | I have been in a real coffin a few hours once for a halloween
       | fright night. Pretty comfy things. Felt quite relaxed.
        
         | Jensson wrote:
         | I think those things are like eating your fill on sugar, it is
         | maybe a bit tasty to eat but you feel awful afterwards. Some
         | people just doesn't connect the eating to the awful feeling so
         | they continue consuming even though its just crap. And I bet
         | there are plenty of studies showing that people actually eat
         | more and like the food better when you add sugar in it.
        
         | antman wrote:
         | I clicked the link, took the first name in the publication,
         | looked him up and is a professor in business and marketing.
         | 
         | The things a professor of marketing needs to publish to thrive
         | professionally these days seems to have become surreal.
        
         | xelxebar wrote:
         | > Maybe most people, but i...
         | 
         | You are Most People:
         | 
         | > Though people say they prefer to watch television without
         | ads, they sometimes enjoy programs that have commercial
         | interruptions more.
         | 
         | The surprising claim isn't that most people say they enjoy
         | commercials, it's that TV programs with commercial
         | interruptions tend to correlate with people reporting higher
         | enjoyment of the TV program _despite claiming that the would
         | prefer less commercials_.
        
           | detaro wrote:
           | Of course, TV programs with higher enjoyment are also the
           | ones that selling ads on is more profitable, and thus are the
           | ones with frequent-ish commercial breaks?
        
           | staticman2 wrote:
           | "TV programs with commercial interruptions tend to correlate
           | with people reporting higher enjoyment of the TV program"
           | 
           | ... when watching an arbitrary TV show picked by the person
           | doing the study.
           | 
           | If you want to start assuming that a TV show you've chosen to
           | watch will be more enjoyable with commercials go ahead, but
           | that wasn't the way the study was done.
        
           | b3lvedere wrote:
           | I can understand that process. Still i like personal control
           | of my breaks :)
        
       | mattgreenrocks wrote:
       | The ultimate hack is weaning yourself off the pull of the hedonic
       | treadmill itself. And the best way I've found for that is to
       | optimize for meaning. Of course, meaning is a difficult goal that
       | is individual and prone to change.
       | 
       | However, it is also a lot more robust than the desires generated
       | by the treadmill. Another way to think about it is learning to
       | practice being content where you are (however imperfect) and
       | sinking your attention into things that engage you and leave you
       | feeling energized.
       | 
       | The treadmill will always be in the back of your mind, but it
       | isn't fit to drive.
        
         | adamsmith143 wrote:
         | But a Red Ferrari 488 gives me lots of meaning...
        
         | rfergie wrote:
         | Don't you just end up on a "meaning treadmill" instead?
        
           | mattgreenrocks wrote:
           | IME, meaning is far more satiating than happiness simply
           | because it is able to offset more BS than being happy will.
           | 
           | More to your question: what happens is your tolerance for
           | meaninglessness decreases, which has good and bad side
           | effects.
        
             | slfnflctd wrote:
             | > your tolerance for meaninglessness decreases
             | 
             | I think part of what keeps me locked on to the hedonistic
             | treadmill is that a lot of other people (including my
             | partner) don't like who I am when I'm trying to stay off
             | it. I tend to get more intense about a lot of things most
             | folks don't care about.
             | 
             | It's funny, out of my whole family & friend circle I'm
             | probably doing the most damage to myself via self
             | medication, but when I try to get _serious_ about things
             | that _matter_ and take a break from intoxicants, I end up
             | doing just as much damage or more by putting my
             | relationships through pointless trials of fire.
             | 
             | But I know what you mean about meaning. When it's good,
             | it's _really_ good and worth every bit of seeking.
             | 
             | It's unfortunate there are so many pitfalls to dodge for so
             | many of us.
        
               | mattgreenrocks wrote:
               | Yeah, I feel this, and, it hurts. A lot.
               | 
               | Others in your life may say they support your emphasis on
               | spiritual growth, but what if that entails being passed
               | up for a promotion, and, ergo, a raise? Most families
               | would appreciate an extra $1k a month. Not every
               | situation is either-or, but you _quickly_ get a sense for
               | what pragmatism means to people.
               | 
               | Often, it means comfort.
               | 
               | I hope you find the courage to continue to pursue
               | meaning. It is good, as you say. Me, I made a bit of a
               | deal with myself to make it a very high priority in my
               | life when it is lacking. When necessary, meaning goes
               | into the non-negotiable bucket.
        
       | cantSpellSober wrote:
       | If you get degenerative chronic illness are you eventually just
       | as happy as you were before it? No, we figured this out in the
       | 70s.
       | 
       | Why is "Hedonic Treadmill" forced into blogspam titles like
       | these? Was there a TED Talk recently?
       | 
       | > _Variators_ are little modulations that keep experiences fresh
       | 
       | So... _variety_? Mind blown.
        
         | niek_pas wrote:
         | > If you get degenerative chronic illness are you eventually
         | just as happy as you were before it? No, we figured this out in
         | the 70s.
         | 
         | No, but that's also not what the HT hypothesis says. The
         | treadmill pushes you back, not forward.
        
           | cantSpellSober wrote:
           | False, it's a tendency to return to a stable level of
           | happiness despite positive _or negative_ events. This doesn
           | 't happen if you get degenerative chronic illness (and it was
           | debunked 50 years ago).
        
       | bndr wrote:
       | Shameless plug, I wrote an article recently on how the hedonic
       | treadmill affects development culture [1].
       | 
       | In my opinion, good approach to avoiding the hedonic treadmill is
       | to think in "processes" rather than "goals." If you achieve some
       | goal, you get back to the equilibrium and get used to it. But if
       | you're on a journey, there's nothing to adapt to as every day is
       | a journey and brings something new. So it's like smaller pendulum
       | swings every day instead of big ones every few months.
       | 
       | Nonetheless, I like the ideas proposed in this article and think
       | they also are quite effective.
       | 
       | [1] https://vadimkravcenko.com/shorts/hedonic-treadmill/
        
       | laserlight wrote:
       | The idea of hacking the hedonic treadmill misses one important
       | point: the mind adapts to these hacks as well. And now you are
       | looking for more hacks.
        
         | Applejinx wrote:
         | Or you can just settle for being sad and frustrated knowing
         | that there will come another day and it'll be better.
         | 
         | Guess that's stepping off the treadmill. I'm interested in
         | stoic philosophy as opposed to epicurian philosophy, so all
         | this talk of the hedonic treadmill seems super weird to me.
         | 
         | :)
        
         | Mikejames wrote:
         | exactly, more more more!
        
         | alach11 wrote:
         | Maybe to break the treadmill we need to subject ourselves to
         | torture once per month to reset our baseline?
        
         | nextos wrote:
         | Relatively, right? It's like adding tons of variation and
         | cycles in training (i.e. periodization). Done correctly, you
         | can keep improving season after season.
        
           | laserlight wrote:
           | Yes. On the one hand the analogy is useful. Just like how
           | physical training makes one physically fit, hedonic hacks
           | might make one hedonically fit. On the other hand, while
           | people might understand and accept that there are genetic
           | limits that they cannot pass beyond, it's never the case for
           | hedonic pleasure. Hedonic adaptation drives one to always
           | look for more.
        
       | p1esk wrote:
       | Pretty sure I'd be happier if I didn't have to work for a living.
        
         | gtirloni wrote:
         | I really like to work and the area I've chosen. What makes it
         | annoying is that I have to work on what upper management thinks
         | is important at any given time. They want me to design a high
         | level software architecture now but I want to code. Next week
         | they want me to code but I want to design. It very rarely
         | aligns. If ever. That annoys me and probably causes management
         | a great deal of anxiety when I go off path. It feels so
         | childish of me. I'm looking for soutions to hack this situation
         | like the hedonic threadmill, in case anyone has suggestions.
        
           | danielheath wrote:
           | It sounds like you don't have the autonomy you think you
           | should - which often comes from the responsibilities being
           | misaligned (presumably management are responsible for some
           | delivery dates which leads them to feel they should be
           | telling you what to work on).
        
           | ricardobayes wrote:
           | Start a startup company
        
           | mxuribe wrote:
           | > I really like to work and the area I've chosen. What makes
           | it annoying is that I have to work on what upper management
           | thinks is important at any given time... ...That annoys me
           | and probably causes management a great deal of anxiety when I
           | go off path. It feels so childish of me..."
           | 
           | OMG, for a moment there i thought you were reading my mind!
           | I've struggled professionally the last few years on this very
           | topic. The only partial solution that i can think of - so far
           | only as an experiment - is to minimize my cost of living,
           | start to slowly partially retire, and move towards being a
           | contract coder - either for corporate gigs or as a sub-
           | contractor for other dev contractors. I figure being a coder
           | (and likely lower level coder, not being like an engineering
           | manager or anything like that anymore), might also allow me
           | the freedom to work remotely, meaning that i can travel a
           | slight bit more. And working in this fashion might give me
           | the freedom to move onto another project/contract if/when i
           | get bored of a particular project and/or client. Its an
           | experiment to be sure...but frankly, that's the only thing
           | that i can think of that might help me. I hope this helps!
           | Happy to discuss more if you have private feedback. (My email
           | is in my profile.)
           | 
           | EDIT: I failed to add that one element that is somewhat
           | holding me back from fully diving into this mode of working
           | right now is (what i feel is) one of the biggest hurdles to
           | entrepreneurial freedom in America: being able to reasonably
           | afford good, solid healthcare. (This is not meant to be
           | political, just adding it in as another cost of living....and
           | for myself, its not a trivial cost.)
        
           | nonrandomstring wrote:
           | > It feels so childish of me.
           | 
           | It is. "Capitalism is for children" said Adam Phillips [1]
           | 
           | You cannot be a fully fledged adult, a self-determined being,
           | under conditions of wage slavery.
           | 
           | Education is set up not to allow graceful separation into
           | adulthood, as most cultures have historically done, but to
           | transfer dependency to a new set of masters.
           | 
           | Late capitalism in particular, with its intrusive lack of
           | boundaries, neurotic management, measurement, bureaucracy and
           | surveillance, or any similar state-controlled apparatus such
           | as in China, is, as that line in "The Matrix" goes - a prison
           | for your mind.
           | 
           | Philosophers criticised the Church (Father, Son, Holy Spirit)
           | as "patently infantile family values" to keep people in
           | subjugation. We have largely overthrown that aspect of
           | patriarchal religion only to replace it with a Corporate
           | equivalent.
           | 
           | > I'm looking for solutions to hack this
           | 
           | How did occidental culture dethrone the Church?
           | 
           | It didn't happen in one day, when everyone decided to live a
           | secular life. For centuries individuals stood up, called
           | themselves "atheists" and refused to join in the rituals.
           | They were punished and suffered pain and ostracism.
           | 
           | The problem is, for the aspiring Hedonist, entering into a
           | world of pain to champion a _principle_ that people should
           | have pleasurable lives, won 't fly for any but the most
           | unselfish and far sighted.
           | 
           | [1]
           | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adam_Phillips_(psychologist)
        
             | badpun wrote:
             | > Education is set up not to allow graceful separation into
             | adulthood, as most cultures have historically done, but to
             | transfer dependency to a new set of masters.
             | 
             | Most cultures historically didn't have any education (as we
             | understand it now), with some rare exceptions (wealthy
             | people hiring tutors for their children). Children just
             | started working very early and learned via observation and
             | on-the-job training.
        
               | nonrandomstring wrote:
               | > Most cultures historically didn't have any education
               | 
               | I'd say that's untrue.
               | 
               | What I am particularly thinking about is rites of passage
               | in primitive cultures. Education may have been as simple
               | as learning to hunt, light a fire, fight, play with
               | children, and cook food - but there were teachings and
               | tests the tribe provided.
               | 
               | > (as we understand it now)
               | 
               | My point would not be that that's trivially true (nothing
               | is as we understand it now if history implies progress),
               | but that _education as we understand it today_ is
               | precisely the functional slight of hand I describe. A
               | study of Mann, Dewey and the Prussian system introduced
               | in North America will bear that out.
               | 
               | Of course, for the fully self-actualised person of good
               | social conscience, learning does not have to align with
               | the formula of state school and higher education. People
               | with the courage to follow different paths are rare, or
               | they have unusual parents who push them down that route
               | (home-schooling, Steiner/Waldorf etc).
        
         | chucktingle wrote:
         | Then don't. Consider alternatives, set goals, and go for it.
        
         | b3lvedere wrote:
         | I've found out i'm a lot happier if i don't have to do
         | overtime. Get out of the building at 5 and stop all work
         | related things until the next working day. Sadly there are days
         | i don't succeed in that, but the days it does make me happier
         | and more relaxed.
        
           | p1esk wrote:
           | I work from home, ~20 hours a week on average, though I never
           | tried to contain my work activities to a certain time window,
           | e.g. yesterday I worked 1-4pm with breaks, and then 10pm-
           | midnight. Honestly I can't even imagine having to haul my ass
           | to a "building" every day and spend all day there, that
           | sounds like a pretty bad life - though I used to do that many
           | years ago.
        
         | mettamage wrote:
         | I don't think I'd be much happier. I work 4 days per week. I
         | need it in order to keep exercising my logical side, because I
         | exercise it a lot less in my personal life.
        
           | badpun wrote:
           | Those Civ5/Civ6 custom maps won't beat themselves... IOW,
           | there's plenty other activities that heavily involve logical
           | side which are not paid coding work.
        
             | mettamage wrote:
             | Of course there are plenty of other activities, but I get
             | paid to do this and I like the ability to actually build
             | something. Civ5/Civ6 feels meaningless in comparison. What
             | have I actually effected in the world? Nothing
        
               | DAVer98 wrote:
               | What you need is semen retention to get back your child
               | hood. Nothing feels meaningless on a long streak.
        
         | quickthrower2 wrote:
         | I recommend doing a hardcore survival course. You'll come back
         | knowing 1. you don't need a job (you do need an occupation...)
         | and 2. why you appreciate modern life, while at the same time
         | why modern life is a bit sad, taking us away from our true
         | habitat.
        
           | [deleted]
        
           | meken wrote:
           | What are some examples of occupation you have in mind?
        
           | p1esk wrote:
           | Interesting. Can you please explain why you believe 1. is
           | true? I know I'm not going to die if I stop working - I'd
           | just become poor, and therefore less happy. If you're
           | suggesting a life of a farmer, then how is it different from
           | having to work?
        
           | shaftoe wrote:
           | Can you recommend any specific hardcore survival courses for
           | people not in military or similar roles?
        
         | [deleted]
        
       | andybak wrote:
       | > flight of beer
       | 
       | First time I've ever heard it called that - and I've had several.
        
         | spread_love wrote:
         | Wine flights, cheese flights, I see it lots of places. I had a
         | "bacon flight" once, it might be getting overused.
        
         | gundmc wrote:
         | Pretty standard across the US for 3-6 small sized tasters from
         | my experience.
        
           | andybak wrote:
           | I'm in the UK.
        
             | euroderf wrote:
             | Obvious question: So what is a tasting line-up called in
             | the UK ?
        
               | andybak wrote:
               | I'm not entirely sure. I might have to do some
               | research...
        
         | harvie wrote:
         | But you have to drink fast, otherwise the last beer gets warm
         | and looses foam before you drink the other beers. Beer without
         | foam (or worse, the warm beer) might be acceptable in some
         | countries, but it's just not what we do here in Czech republic.
        
       | binbag wrote:
       | Coder philosophy drivel has truly ascended to the level of high
       | art.
        
         | benj111 wrote:
         | 'coder philosophy'?
         | 
         | It's just awareness of yourself. If you know that if you have
         | one glass of wine, that leads to a 3 day bender, then you can
         | do something to stop the cycle. If you mindlessly consume to be
         | happier, this is a tool to stop the cycle.
        
         | Ygg2 wrote:
         | https://youtu.be/_o7qjN3KF8U
        
           | binbag wrote:
           | Haha, exactly
        
         | apostate wrote:
         | The author has a PhD in psychology, fwiw.
        
           | binbag wrote:
           | Great, I've got one of those too. It doesn't mean you can't
           | bullshit.
        
             | apostate wrote:
             | I wasn't making a value judgement on the piece (or the
             | author's credentials). My point was that someone took the
             | time to share something with the world and you dismissed it
             | after making (incorrect) assumptions about their
             | background. You'll miss out on a lot of good stuff if
             | you've already cast judgement before you finish reading the
             | title.
             | 
             | In any case, it's a <3min read and it _does_ offer a few
             | non-BS pieces of advice that may be useful to some.
        
           | adamsmith143 wrote:
           | Of all the appeals to authority, this has to be among the
           | weakest.
        
             | apostate wrote:
             | I was not highlighting the author's background to appeal to
             | authority. I was pointing out that what OP dismissed as
             | "coder philosophy drivel" (likely from skimming the title
             | and nothing else) was written by someone who has nothing to
             | do with that field.
             | 
             | In fact, by doing that, OP made an anti-appeal-to-
             | authority. You seem to be interested in logical fallacies..
             | could you help me out and tell me if that one has a
             | specific name?
        
               | adamsmith143 wrote:
               | So we can replace "coder philosophy drivel" with
               | "psychologist philosophy drivel". Doesn't seem to change
               | much.
        
               | apostate wrote:
               | Sure, you seem intent on making a point that has nothing
               | to do with OP's assertion or my observation, so go for
               | it. (That's a strawman fallacy, right?)
        
           | Ygg2 wrote:
           | So? It's not a field known for solid, repeatable science.
           | 
           | Nor does it stop author from believing his own lies.
        
             | apostate wrote:
             | Wasn't my point at all, see my other responses.
        
         | [deleted]
        
       | shepherdjerred wrote:
       | > That afternoon when someone is staying with you and they go see
       | another friend who lives in the same city and you go to work or
       | stay home and do laundry or whatever
       | 
       | Great article, but this is a ridiculously hard to parse sentence
       | with the number of `ands` and `ors`.
        
       | darod wrote:
       | "Commercial breaks--people actually enjoy TV more with
       | commercials." I've never enjoyed being disrupted by commercials
       | nor has anyone else. This is why Tivo became so popular
        
         | sbmthakur wrote:
         | A side-effect of commercial breaks is interrupting viewer's
         | eye-contact. In case of longer breaks people often walk around
         | for a couple of minutes.
        
         | jimbob45 wrote:
         | A lot of shows are/were designed with commercials in mind. For
         | example, the villain will shoot at the protagonist without
         | showing whether or not the shots hit until after the commercial
         | break. That extended suspense has been more or less lost in the
         | age of Netflix (unless shows design for that suspense in
         | another way).
        
         | kshacker wrote:
         | As I have gotten older, and as I am watching more serialized TV
         | (and sometimes news), I find it helps to get a break once in a
         | while. Mental or watch based breaks are one thing but I find
         | myself ignoring them. Commercial breaks that I do not control
         | are definitely helpful. Now I do not want 38 minutes of TV and
         | 22 minutes of commercial, but I would definitely welcome fixed
         | 2 minutes breaks every 20 minutes or so. I may still skip
         | through them, but there may be times when I just let it run
         | while I walk around or check messages - we can talk all we want
         | about device addiction but if I know I will get a break, I am
         | less tempted (and maybe less addicted) to check messages by
         | pausing the show.
        
         | abawany wrote:
         | Agree - at best one gets used to commercials, like dirt in the
         | house until the vacuuming can happen, but one never enjoys
         | them. I didn't realize how much I hated ads until I tried
         | Netflix a few years ago - I've never been able to watch
         | tv/cable/ad-supported "free" content since then.
        
         | rconti wrote:
         | Not exactly the same, but I often watch TiVo'd or otherwise-
         | DVR'd content; I might start 30 minutes 'behind' on a 3 hour
         | event and have a very, very hard time 'catching up' to live --
         | I pause for my bathroom breaks and grabbing food or drink, and
         | find that I need almost as much time away from the content as
         | the commercial breaks (which I'm skipping) would have offered.
         | 
         | It's still nice being able to choose when to take those breaks,
         | however.
        
         | nix0n wrote:
         | The ideal would be a return of intermissions. A calm reminder
         | from the Roku to take a breath, get up, maybe grab some water.
         | 
         | (Movie theaters would make more money this way, also.)
        
         | johnchristopher wrote:
         | https://hbr.org/2010/10/defend-your-research-commercials-mak...
         | 
         | > The study: Leif Nelson, in collaboration with Tom Meyvis of
         | New York University's Stern School and Jeff Galak of Carnegie
         | Mellon's Tepper School, showed subjects three kinds of TV
         | shows: Taxi episodes, nature documentaries, and Bollywood
         | programs. Some watched the shows with commercials, some
         | without. Subjects who watched TV with commercials reported
         | greater enjoyment--and were willing to pay more for DVD
         | collections of shows by the same director--than subjects who
         | watched without interruptions.
         | 
         | Maybe the show is good enough that people want to watch it
         | without interruptions but the show is not good enough that
         | people who have watched it would pay to rewatch ?
        
           | fartcannon wrote:
           | This is probably rude, but maybe people who are happy to sit
           | through commercials are more capable of enjoying the
           | extremely middling (I'm being generous here) quality of most
           | TV?
           | 
           | So people who dislike commercials also dislike the kind of
           | shows that are on TV and thus aren't willing to watch more or
           | pay for more.
        
           | Terretta wrote:
           | Plausible explanations include (a) the study is flawed, (b)
           | some TV is so bad the commercials are a relief, or (c) the
           | cohort that enjoys TV with ads more are the nascent
           | idiocracy.
           | 
           | Did those willing to pay more for the DVDs want the ads on
           | the DVD? Or pay more to get without ads?
        
             | petercooper wrote:
             | The article says the reason. A pleasurable activity being
             | interrupted and restarted is more pleasurable due to the
             | resumption. This makes a lot of sense to me, because I
             | certainly enjoy a lie in more if I wake up and then go back
             | to sleep than if I merely woke up at the later time.
             | 
             | I think it's a variant of the old "nothing feels good if
             | nothing feels bad to compare it with" chestnut. You could
             | probably replace the commercials with almost anything
             | mildly inconvenient.
        
               | darod wrote:
               | I think it really depends on the type of interruption.
               | Most commercials are not a calm segue to take a break
               | from the show. Advertisers purposely increase the volume
               | because they know you're going to be stepping away and
               | shock you with colors and a barrage of images because
               | they know they have microseconds to get some image into
               | your subconscious so that you can think of their product
               | on your next commute to work.
        
           | cantSpellSober wrote:
           | It was actually several studies, most were conducted on ~100
           | American college students in 2009. The authors themselves
           | weren't totally convinced:
           | 
           | > As has been shown with other positive life experiences,
           | people predict and recollect experiences in terms of their
           | imperfect expectations and often independent of their actual
           | experience. As such, after having watched a show with
           | commercial interruptions, consumers may rely on their lay
           | beliefs and later recall that experience as aversive, which
           | in turn will lead them to expect more aversive reactions to
           | commercial interruptions in the future.
           | 
           | -- _Enhancing the Television Viewing Experience through
           | Commercial Interruption_
        
       | Mikejames wrote:
       | I like these hacks, it's also a mindset that needs to be at the
       | forefront of all of this, why not eudaemonia over hedonism? Ive
       | been interested recently around eudaemonia, Whilst i'm familiar
       | with some of its stoic principles im just barely scratching the
       | surface,
       | 
       | this is just my take, but there's noticeable patterns within
       | literature in subjects such as minimalism, buddhism and stoicism.
       | All pointing towards eudaemonia over hedonism. Sam Harris in his
       | Waking Up Book / App covers this hedonic treadmill well too
       | 
       | we don't embrace the impermanence of things
       | 
       | we're programmed in the western world to be constantly chasing
       | desire, these hacks build gratitude, which is a trait in
       | eudaemonia,
       | 
       | thanks for sharing
        
         | kalimanzaro wrote:
         | A hackergroup inspired by Eudaimonism:
         | 
         | https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eudaemons
        
       | scld wrote:
       | Because that line about preferring commercials completely rang
       | false to me, I followed the link....it's from 2010...
       | 
       | "You still haven't accounted for the popularity of, say,The
       | Sopranos and all the subscription-channel programs. Don't we pay
       | to get those shows without commercials?
       | 
       | Contemporary shows like The Sopranos might be interrupting
       | themselves. Remember, it's not the commercial that increases the
       | enjoyment, it's the interruption. These shows often run six or
       | more parallel plots and constantly shuffle between them. One plot
       | interrupts another."
       | 
       | ...so, that entire concept has, IMO, been disproven by the rise
       | of streaming services.
        
         | twobitshifter wrote:
         | I don't think I like commercials either, but the enforced
         | pacing of the shows with commercials is something that I miss
         | when I rewatch shows built for commercials on streaming
         | services. You'll come up against a cliffhanger cut and then a
         | second later it's resolved because there's no commercial break.
        
           | mewse-hn wrote:
           | I recently rewatched the entirety of DS9 on canadian netflix
           | and I don't think I'm under any illusion that the bullshit
           | cliffhangers they'd put before a commercial break actually
           | _added_ to the show
        
           | HEI-Points wrote:
           | Why do you miss that? They had to mangle the plot to end on a
           | different cliffhanger every 10 minutes.
        
         | user00012-ab wrote:
         | I stopped reading the article at that point; figuring the rest
         | of the article was also made up by gpt3.
        
       | layer8 wrote:
       | TLDR: Turn it into a hedonic rollercoaster.
        
       | thenerdhead wrote:
       | I think you can simplify this.
       | 
       | Consider your wants and needs.
       | 
       | Most of us get stuck in our wants. We want to get a promotion, we
       | want a nice car, we want a perfect family vacation.
       | 
       | But do we need any of those? Not necessarily.
       | 
       | We get stuck on the treadmill by not knowing the difference of
       | our wants and needs. When you realize you don't need the things
       | you want, you focus more on the things you need.
       | 
       | Introspection in my opinion helps you find your inner happiness
       | in discerning your needs from wants. This is why many ancient
       | philosophers believed you can be plenty happy with "enough".
        
         | balfirevic wrote:
         | Can you give some examples of needs? The obvious ones are food,
         | water, shelter and (for most people) companionship. Any others?
        
           | thenerdhead wrote:
           | Maslow's hierarchy of needs to start, but to extend on more
           | modern meaning, your psychological needs are quite important
           | given most people have their basic needs met. There's a
           | popular self-determination theory to explain this further.
           | 
           | i.e. Autonomy, competence, relatedness.
           | 
           | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-determination_theory
           | 
           | One of the better books on this topic is "Transcend: The New
           | Science of Self-Actualization" by Scott Barry Kaufman
           | 
           | Here's a piece I wrote based on that book:
           | 
           | Think of your life as a sailboat.
           | 
           | The hull protects us from the waves and keeps us safe.
           | 
           | The sail allows us to explore and adapt to our environment.
           | 
           | However, to get anywhere, we must open our sail to the world.
           | Without that, we're stuck in harbor.
           | 
           | As we set out in the world in the many different directions
           | we each may take in life. We are all sailing into the unknown
           | of the sea together.
           | 
           | So while a ship in harbor is safe, that's not what ships are
           | built for.
           | 
           | Even though you're alone in your boat, it's nice to see other
           | lights along the way.
        
       | LesZedCB wrote:
       | I would prefer not to.
        
         | oneaaronofmany wrote:
        
       | antman wrote:
       | Oh yes Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. This article
       | kind of mixes different definitions of happiness. There's the
       | constitutional reference which comes from ancient greek roman
       | philosophy and its origin is Aristotelian
       | 
       | Happiness as "Evdemonia" in Aristotelian scripts (Eudemonia in
       | wikipedia) which more accurately translates as having "good
       | demons" with you, which can be interpreted as feeling
       | content/lucky for what you have.
       | 
       | Happiness as "Joyfulness" which is smily face marketing and
       | instant gratification and hedonistic stuff aka buying the new
       | iphone each year and getting bored at it and buying afterwards
       | the next one because under a microscope the photo of the dark
       | side of the moon looks better, when somebody else takes it.
       | 
       | So if one needs to repeat escalate: hedonism usually exploited by
       | marketing, if you need to pay probably a facade of happiness and
       | unfulfilling. Hedonism is nice to have tho.
       | 
       | If one is feeling lucky for his life and future: happiness aka
       | lucky for parameters of ones life that would be deemed important
       | 300 years ago and should be important in 300 years, conative with
       | a sense of purpose. usually exploited by social and political
       | systems (e.g.to be happy you need good health, very expensive if
       | politics fights life) happiness is a must have
       | 
       | This article conflates one definition of happiness to the other
       | while only discussing affective optimisation of hedonism.
        
         | Comevius wrote:
         | We don't buy the next iPhone because it has a better camera,
         | but because it makes us feel not being left behind. I routinely
         | see people who can't afford one splurging on the newest iPhone
         | and AirPods. People even wear fake AirPods.
         | 
         | Radiohead has an entire album about how fake and ultimately
         | unfulfilling this is, but the problem is that we live in a
         | society, and nobody wants to be an outlier. I may like the
         | sound quality of my old earphones, but I still feel a tingle of
         | shame when everyone else is sporting AirPods. We are evolved to
         | follow norms, those who don't were ostracised from the
         | community with dire consequences. This kind of fake happiness
         | is thus an advantage.
        
           | antman wrote:
           | We don't disagree! I did not say we buy the new thing because
           | it has a better camera experience, I said we are buying it
           | because we are told others are having a better camera
           | experience which we will not witness anyway
        
             | Comevius wrote:
             | The most expensive iPhone variant (Pro Max) has the best
             | camera, but the bulk of the social value is having a
             | contemporary iPhone, which is an iPhone with a notch, X and
             | newer. Social value hinges on obvious differences. Cameras
             | are used for selfies and art. As long as there are no
             | obvious differences a better camera wouldn't trigger our
             | fear of being ostracised. A new kind of camera, like
             | everyone suddenly using front-facing cameras, or everyone
             | suddenly taking 3D selfies with a new camera would. It's a
             | two-way street though, if most people think that 3D selfies
             | are not it your new camera is now a source of
             | embarrassment.
        
         | bigbillheck wrote:
         | > Happiness as "Evdemonia" in Aristotelian scripts
         | 
         | Since when would Aristotle have used the latin alphabet?
        
           | akimball wrote:
           | Much of Aristotle is evidenced in Latin translations for
           | which the Greek is lost.
        
       | benj111 wrote:
       | Awareness of the hedonic treadmill meshes quite well with my
       | 'frugal' Yorkshire tendencies.
       | 
       | A favourite on HN seems to be coffee, and spending ever more on
       | 'good' coffee. I mainly just drink instant coffee, filter coffee
       | for the weekend. I still get my 'good' coffee and I appreciate
       | it. Same goes for wine and chocolate.
       | 
       | It's also led me away from expensive experiences to
       | unique/different experiences.
       | 
       | It's also helpful for informing new purchases. Do I need the
       | latest car with all the bells and whistles or can I just stay a
       | generation behind and be excited with a new car with electric
       | windows or whatever.
        
         | ThePadawan wrote:
         | I'm right there with you!
         | 
         | I just recently bought some Ersatz coffee and thought to myself
         | 
         | "Well, what sounds more like a unique experience. Coffee, or a
         | blend of roasted chicory, wheat, barley, figs and acorns?"
         | 
         | This stuff is pretty great, and regardless of how much it
         | resembles coffee (which it does to a surprising extent), this
         | was a really solid purchase.
        
           | benj111 wrote:
           | And if you don't like it, you enjoy the real coffee all the
           | more when you go back to it!
        
         | vangelis wrote:
         | I think there's a triple point of quality-time-cost for
         | products like that. Coffee, wine, and chocolate especially are
         | subject to diminishing returns. Price is ~usually~ an indicator
         | of quality, but there's an element of your time (research) in
         | finding the best for the price stuff.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2022-08-12 23:02 UTC)