[HN Gopher] The Case of the Mysterious Holes on the Seafloor
___________________________________________________________________
The Case of the Mysterious Holes on the Seafloor
Author : smartmic
Score : 80 points
Date : 2022-08-07 19:26 UTC (3 hours ago)
(HTM) web link (oceanexplorer.noaa.gov)
(TXT) w3m dump (oceanexplorer.noaa.gov)
| LadyCailin wrote:
| It's so you can more easily tear the ocean floor.
| [deleted]
| silasdavis wrote:
| The spinal column of a since devoured vertebrate?
| jamestimmins wrote:
| It often _feels_ like there aren 't many mysteries left in
| nature, so it's great to see scientists react with childlike
| excitement about the prospect of something new and unexplained.
| kadoban wrote:
| The deep ocean is a great place to look for such mysteries too,
| we have such a limited view of it, and it's _such_ an alien
| place in a lot of ways.
| swayvil wrote:
| Check out meditation. It could be called a study of seeing.
|
| Given one way of seeing, certain models and conclusions can be
| drawn. But change the seeing and the models cease to hold. And
| then change it again. And again.
|
| We have a couple of methods for messing with that. A whole
| seeing-cultivation program.
|
| Lots of good mystery there.
| oment wrote:
| ecco?
|
| who is we?
|
| your comment hist. (opened) - observing patterns.
| jessepasley wrote:
| funnyhairguy.jpg
| dhosek wrote:
| I'm not saying it's aliens but... it's definitely aliens.
| dennyabraham wrote:
| This reminds me of another deep sea mystery trace,
| Paleodictyon[1]. Once an unconnected set of geometric fossils and
| modern hole patterns, it's been discovered that this phenomenon
| has occurred in a consistent form for half a billion years up to
| the present day.
|
| [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paleodictyon
| ThisIsMyAltFace wrote:
| There's a nice PBS video about them with footage of the holes:
| https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pz1fccY3S84
| a9h74j wrote:
| Also interesting that they reference similar evidence in fossils.
| abecedarius wrote:
| What do they mean by sublinear here?
| walnutclosefarm wrote:
| "Almost in a line."
| kadoban wrote:
| > Almost but not quite linear in shape.
|
| Seems like the intended meaning based on context.
|
| https://en.m.wiktionary.org/wiki/sublinear
| kuprel wrote:
| O(n^k) where 0 < k < 1
| aaaaaaaaaaab wrote:
| More like o(n).
| quantum_mcts wrote:
| Would O(ln n) be "sublinear", though?
| [deleted]
| thaumasiotes wrote:
| Of course. kuprel already said so.
| sterlind wrote:
| I'm bad at math, but this is because d/dx ln(x) = x^-1,
| while d/dx x^k = kx^(-1+k), so as long as k > 0 the
| derivative of the latter is larger, right?
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2022-08-07 23:00 UTC)