[HN Gopher] Show HN: Killer Crossword - A crossword puzzle varia...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Show HN: Killer Crossword - A crossword puzzle variation with no
       clues
        
       Author : danieltait
       Score  : 97 points
       Date   : 2022-08-04 13:45 UTC (9 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (killercrossword.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (killercrossword.com)
        
       | pwinnski wrote:
       | Excellent. This focuses on word recognition, which is a large
       | part of vocabulary, omitting the need for meaning. I suppose it
       | also provides chances for people who don't know words to work out
       | new words based on phonetic patterns and which letters remain.
       | 
       | Great stuff!
        
       | banana_giraffe wrote:
       | Kind of the inverse of a diagramless crossword. Nice concept,
       | well executed.
       | 
       | Reminds me of Knotwords.
        
         | waxpancake wrote:
         | Knotwords is a delight, highly recommend checking it out if
         | anyone likes this concept.
         | https://noodlecake.com/games/knotwords/
        
       | vehementi wrote:
       | I despaired until I saw that it actually confirms something is
       | right and locked in. Nice!
        
       | _dain_ wrote:
       | It doesn't let me enter the letter P.
        
       | scottlu2 wrote:
       | Love it - my wife and I enjoying playing that - on an iPad.
       | Nicely made.
        
       | eterm wrote:
       | Fun but very frustrating controls. If you mis-type a letter in
       | one box and it's the only letter left of that letter then you
       | can't type it elsewhere which gets me right in a muddle. Also the
       | delete key doesn't appear to work, only the backspace.
       | 
       | Tab really ought to tab through the words as well as arrow keys,
       | which don't cursor to filled in letters which is also
       | frustrating.
       | 
       | I'd like to be able to type a whole word, including over-typing
       | the letters provided.
       | 
       | I'd recommend playing around with the guardian crossword for
       | inspiration of a control scheme.
       | 
       | But fun core idea!
        
       | pixxel wrote:
       | Nice job.
        
       | fcoury wrote:
       | It's really a lot of fun, well done!
        
       | naet wrote:
       | Kind of fun the first time, but I think I prefer a normal
       | crossword. Seems like the only way to progress is to pick an
       | unfinished word and then do tons of guesses back to back of all
       | the possibilities until one turns green, which starts to get
       | boring when there are a lot of possibilities.
       | 
       | Feels more like stenography or data entry than playing a game at
       | that point where you're just typing 10+ guesses without any
       | investment in any one of them.
       | 
       | For example, when I tried the larger version, I got to a point of
       | a 2/3 filled word: _ET.
       | 
       | I then had to sit and enter:
       | 
       | -bet -get -jet -let -met -net -pet -set -vet -wet
       | 
       | and finally, I got to the word: yet. And that's not even
       | including some less common but still valid words I would guess
       | like ret and tet, which I'm not sure are off the table as
       | possibly valid entries. It just felt like a chore more than a
       | puzzle to get that word, and I have to repeat it over and over
       | for the other words. Maybe as you get to a close the letter pool
       | gets a bit smaller so you have less guesses, but that's only
       | after you've guessed out a significant portion of the puzzle.
       | 
       | Wordle avoids this by giving you information on your guesses,
       | making them feel less like a huge string of purely random
       | guesses. Crosswords give you cryptic clues that aren't obvious,
       | but make you feel like any guess was based on deductive reasoning
       | rather than some brute force attempt.
       | 
       | Still, nice job on building and releasing the project! And it
       | sounds like other commenters are enjoying it more than I am, so
       | maybe I'm just a stick in the mud or I like word games too much
       | and have too much time invested in them.
        
         | sbf501 wrote:
         | I agree with this. Three-letter words that dangle by one letter
         | are just a chore. There needs to be a balance between
         | discoverability and guessing. Perhaps the auto-generator needs
         | to evaluate the discoverability somehow...
         | 
         | Also, why no cookie keeping your trend? That's what keeps me
         | coming back: not wanting to break a streak! (Not to promote
         | dark patterns or anything.)
         | 
         | Also also, nice UX. I found it easy to navigate, edit, and
         | delete.
        
         | dmitriid wrote:
         | Knotwords is a much better variation on this I believe:
         | https://playknotwords.com/
        
         | akudha wrote:
         | One way to make it more enjoyable could be to do it by topic -
         | this way the universe of words would be much smaller, instead
         | of the entire dictionary. Topics could be - music, baseball,
         | food etc
        
           | nkrisc wrote:
           | Kind of like one clue for the whole puzzle, instead of
           | individual ones. That sounds much more fun than simply
           | nothing.
        
       | someguy5344523 wrote:
       | This is a very neat idea! My problem is with the layout: why is
       | there a black area below the crossword, where if I drag the
       | crossword there the crossword disappears? That area should be a
       | lot smaller
        
       | 0xC0ncord wrote:
       | My girlfriend and I just did this and had a lot of fun!
       | 
       | There were a lot of times where I thought I figured a word out
       | but ended up having to go through about 5 or 6 really good
       | guesses before landing on the right one. Sometimes little word
       | games like these really can test my vocabulary.
        
       | joe__f wrote:
       | Seems like the pool of words is quite small; for example with
       | T_RN it was clear that o or u would be the answer, even though a
       | and e also give valid words
        
       | benji-york wrote:
       | I really like it!
       | 
       | I feel like it could use some scoring mechanism. I want to feel
       | friction against just making guesses until something works.
       | 
       | Post-completion edit:
       | 
       | It does have a time-based scoring mechanism. That didn't register
       | with me at first. I continue to feel that it could use come
       | mechanism to dissuade low-effort guessing.
        
       | lovehashbrowns wrote:
       | This is really fun! Seems like I'll enjoy this more than a
       | regular crossword puzzle because it has less of a focus on
       | cultural references.
        
         | danieltait wrote:
         | Thank you!
        
       | mcdonje wrote:
       | Seems like a lot of commenters like it, so there's probably an
       | audience.
       | 
       | I don't think it'll be a hit with the main crossword community
       | because the crossword constructors put a lot of humor and
       | cleverness in the clues, which is a major draw. The personal
       | touch makes it seem like you're in a community of clever people
       | who are trying to entertain each other.
       | 
       | I suppose this would be a good learning aid for students who are
       | learning vocabulary.
        
         | [deleted]
        
       | adwi wrote:
       | Suggestion: allow user to click the area with the clue to switch
       | between down/across typing, ala NYT
        
       | antonymy wrote:
       | I did very little guessing on the regular puzzle, which took me a
       | little over 6 minutes, but the master-level one did require some
       | brute force at first and took me much longer to finish. Once I
       | got rolling, though, I was able to solve it intuitively. It's
       | more like a sudoku but instead of mathematic logic you rely on
       | your knowledge of English vocabulary and spelling. It may not
       | have traditional clues but by giving you the pool of letters for
       | all words it gets progressively easier as you fill in the grid
       | and eliminates certain possibilities out of hand.
       | 
       | The only real issue is getting your initial foothold, especially
       | if the grid's pre-filled letters are mostly common and not
       | helpful in placement. Having a pre-filled J is much more useful
       | than, say, a prefilled E.
        
       | bombcar wrote:
       | Very nice! But the white for a placed letter and gray for a
       | original letter is too close - I was trying to figure out why no
       | word would work when I realized I had placed the T - it wasn't an
       | original letter.
        
         | danieltait wrote:
         | Good feedback thanks, I'll try some different colours or ways
         | to mark the originals.
        
       | TylerE wrote:
       | Not sizing properly to my screen
       | 
       | https://i.imgur.com/CdIkpVA.png
        
         | danieltait wrote:
         | Thanks for the report. What device / browser is this? You
         | should also be able to zoom the puzzle in and out with mouse
         | wheel, trackpad two fingers or touch screen pinch in the
         | meantime
        
           | TylerE wrote:
           | Chrome on a Macbook
        
       | guimonz wrote:
       | Nice concept, but at some point you get forced into brute forcing
       | your solution, which isn't as much fun.
        
       | benji-york wrote:
       | The keyboard control is quite nice.
        
         | criddell wrote:
         | Except I wish I could delete a letter using the delete key (on
         | my Windows keyboard).
        
           | pekim wrote:
           | Backspace works for me.
        
       | nmstoker wrote:
       | How is the Share feature meant to work? It seems to be failing
       | within Android Firefox Nightly (nothing gets copied and for a
       | split second the positioned letters blink away then return)
        
       | sleepypizza wrote:
       | Just did the basic one :) Going to ask my girlfriend to bring her
       | laptop to my apartment tonight and race her on the hard one.
       | 
       | Not sure if that's a piece of observable behavior that helps you
       | figure out a market / how you want to grow this, but definitely
       | speaks to the kind of delight I've got out of your prototype!
        
       | pbhjpbhj wrote:
       | A lot of comments seem as if they believe this to be a novel
       | crossword type? I thought I'd seen the exact format in The Times
       | (of London)?
        
       | te wrote:
       | Very fun. Didn't realize I was being timed? When did the timer
       | start? Maybe show it on screen real-time? Increases the pressure!
        
       | jciochon wrote:
       | Really enjoyed this.
       | 
       | One issue: sharing my results was not great. Pasting in iMessage
       | gave the result text and the image; pasting in discord only gave
       | the text; pasting in telegram only gave the image.
       | 
       | Not sure if this is even your fault, but it doesn't have as nice
       | of an experience there as Wordle (which I assume you're trying to
       | emulate).
        
         | maxique wrote:
         | If the link had https:// before it, Discord and Telegram would
         | do the same link preview that iMessage does
        
       | ianferrel wrote:
       | Fun.
       | 
       | Should probably not let people delete the initially-provided
       | letters. I did so accidentally at one point and got very confused
       | for a long time.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2022-08-04 23:01 UTC)