[HN Gopher] Volcanic eruption starts in Iceland (Live webcam)
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Volcanic eruption starts in Iceland (Live webcam)
        
       Author : MrDresden
       Score  : 112 points
       Date   : 2022-08-03 14:07 UTC (8 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.ruv.is)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.ruv.is)
        
       | IYasha wrote:
       | Hot. And I wanted to move to Iceland not long ago...
        
       | bell-cot wrote:
       | GeologyHub ( https://www.youtube.com/c/GeologyHub/videos ) does
       | very short (~4 minute) daily videos on volcanic activity, and has
       | covered Iceland several of times recently.
        
         | devoutsalsa wrote:
         | Great channel.
        
       | bilsbie wrote:
       | How much co2 will this release and can we afford it?
        
         | aaaaaaaaaaab wrote:
         | True! We should build a huge biodome above Iceland to contain
         | the CO2.
        
         | JRKrause wrote:
         | If I recall the math, the yearly total eruption of actual magma
         | mass is on the same order as the yearly mass of CO2 emitted by
         | humans (some like 80billion tons of magma vs 30billion tons of
         | CO2). The percent, by mass, of dissolved CO2 in that magma is
         | in the single digits.
         | 
         | So to answer to your question: It's a drop in the bucket.
        
           | runarberg wrote:
           | There was an eruption in the same location last year, that
           | lasted for about 6 months. I think it emitted between 1 and
           | 1.5 million tonnes of CO2 equivalent greenhouse gases. In
           | comparison humans in Iceland emitted around 2-10 million
           | tonnes (depending on what you include) during the same
           | period.
           | 
           | Another fun comparison is that Elon Musk's 50 min flight in
           | his private jet last Friday between Brownsville, TX and
           | Austin, TX emitted around as much as last years eruption did
           | in a day.
        
             | lostlogin wrote:
             | Are you sure? Unless I'm messing it up, 1.5m/180=8333kgs.
             | Flying would struggle to make that in an hour wouldn't it?
        
               | runarberg wrote:
               | You are right. I'm off by a factor of 1000!
               | 
               | I used this article (https://kjarninn.is/skodun/eldgos-
               | og-co2/ [Icelandic]) which states that the eruption
               | emitted between 4,000 and 7,000 tonnes of CO2 a day. And
               | then I used the @ElonJet twitter bot
               | (https://twitter.com/ElonJet/status/1553102092327321601)
               | to get the 4 tonnes.
               | 
               | Elon's 12 hour flight back from Greece a couple of
               | weekends ago emitted 65 tonnes of CO2. That is 1/100 of
               | what the volcano emitted over 24 hours. So he has to fly
               | 50 hours to emit the same amount of CO2 as the volcano
               | does in an hour. I wouldn't be surprised if there are 50
               | CEOs flying their private jets at this very moment.
               | 
               | ---
               | 
               | The Icelandic tendency to write out the word thousand
               | plus all the weirdness of the tonne weight unit (as
               | opposed to Mega-grams and Giga-grams) caused my
               | confusion.
        
         | Kutta wrote:
         | It will release approximately no CO2.
        
           | Maursault wrote:
           | Iceland is a pioneer in clean vulcanism.
        
         | julienchastang wrote:
         | You are correct. The Icelandic volcano will release CO2.
         | Volcanoes play a vital role in the carbon balance in the
         | Earth's atmosphere. If it were not for volcanoes releasing CO2,
         | Earth would be a lifeless snowball planet with little or no
         | greenhouse gases containing the heat. Moreover, that CO2 will
         | be reabsorbed into the crust of the earth through the process
         | of weathering, CO2 + H2O - H2CO3, CaCO3 + H2CO3 - Ca2+ +
         | 2HCO3-. This will also happen for all the CO2 that human
         | activity is belching into the atmosphere. The problem is this
         | will take geologic time for the problem to correct itself.
        
         | vkou wrote:
         | A year's worth of volcanism emits some amount of CO2, and an
         | ~equivalent amount is consumed and stockpiled by other natural
         | processes. It's why in the long-term of hundreds of thousands
         | of years, CO2 concentrations in the atmosphere are more or less
         | stable.
         | 
         | Unfortunately, when humans started emitting millions of years
         | of CO2 stockpiles, the natural processes of the carbon cycle
         | that take CO2 out of the atmosphere haven't magically scaled up
         | to compensate.
         | 
         | Volcanism slowly drips water into a bucket that has a small
         | hole in the bottom. Over the course of hundreds of thousands of
         | years, the water level in the bucket stays more or less the
         | same. Humans come along, and start filling the bucket with a
         | firehose, and then start questioning if they, or the volcano
         | are the reason the bucket overflowed.
         | 
         | This is basic stuff that's covered in any high-school-level
         | textbook on the subject.
        
         | rogo007 wrote:
         | "There is no question that very large volcanic eruptions can
         | inject significant amounts of carbon dioxide into the
         | atmosphere. The 1980 eruption of Mount St. Helens vented
         | approximately 10 million tons of CO2 into the atmosphere in
         | only 9 hours"
        
         | runarberg wrote:
         | There was a famous case of one volcano in Iceland that stranded
         | a bunch of airplanes resulting in net greenhouse savings. That
         | is the amount of greenhouse gas that the volcano emitted was
         | less then what the airplanes would have otherwise emitted if
         | the volcano wouldn't have stranded them.
         | 
         | That was a fairly small eruption though and didn't emit a lot
         | of greenhouse gas. There was another eruption last year in the
         | same place as this one, and it was even smaller. This one seems
         | to be larger then last years eruption, but I would be surprised
         | if this one actually emitted more greenhouse gas over the next
         | year then e.g. Iceland's aluminum industry.
         | 
         | So to answer your question if we can afford it. The answer is
         | yes. We are experiencing about average number of volcanoes
         | globally, and the greenhouse gas emissions of volcanoes has
         | remained steady for the last few millions years, and we are not
         | seeing any increase. In comparison human greenhouse gas
         | emissions are rising dramatically, we should probably focus our
         | efforts there.
         | 
         | EDIT: Here is a short article (in Icelandic) about the
         | greenhouse gas emissions of last year's eruption:
         | https://kjarninn.is/skodun/eldgos-og-co2/
        
       | julienchastang wrote:
       | Dammit! I was just there at the end of June.
        
       | gojomo wrote:
       | As soon as my 2nd vax dose was 14d behind-me in May 2021, I went
       | to Iceland - which had just recently reopened to vaxed travelers
       | - to see the Fagradalsfjall eruption. It was just a ~50m drive
       | from Reykjavik, plus a ~1h20m hike.
       | 
       | It was spectacular - launching large lava plumes on a roughly
       | 8-minute, reliable cycle, and feeding ever-growing lava fields
       | out around both sides of one hilltop that was ideal for watching
       | the volcano. (The rising lava fields made that perch unreachable
       | just a few weeks later.)
       | 
       | If you've ever wanted to see an eruption up-close, with actual
       | hot flowing lava, get there while it's going/growing. (Of course,
       | this could stop tomorrow or continue for months.)
       | 
       | A good writeup about that time of volcano-tourism:
       | https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2021/08/23/chasing-the-la...
        
         | devoutsalsa wrote:
         | I did the same on. I got a chance to get reasonably close on
         | May 29, 2021. Here's the coolest selfie I'll ever take.
         | 
         | https://i.imgur.com/pCA1gSr.jpg
         | 
         | Two days later the hill on which I took that selfie was cut off
         | from a new lava flow.
        
           | gojomo wrote:
           | That hill was amazing! Almost like box seats over the show,
           | close in, but high above places where dangerous gasses most
           | likely to collect, and offering 360deg views of surrounding
           | valleys slowly filling with lava.
        
       | ChrisArchitect wrote:
       | Iceland continuing to thank its lucky stars (or elves or whatever
       | they believe in) for these absolutely perfect tourist
       | attractions. I mean, a crazy but not too crazy eruption,
       | continuous flow of lava just a stones throw from Reykjavik? And
       | now it's happening again? The Earth's gift that keeps on giving.
       | 
       | Makes me wonder, what if the mayor or head of tourism or
       | something found a way to 'poke' the mantle and make the lava
       | start flowing again after the last one dried up earlier. haha
        
         | gojomo wrote:
         | I whimsically considered the same! Iceland, using its secret
         | volcano-control technology, creating easy-to-reach new post-
         | pandemic tourist attractions.
         | 
         | But I don't think the government has that capability. The
         | Huldufolk, on the other hand, might:
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hulduf%C3%B3lk
        
       | kvetching wrote:
       | It's amazing that Energy is such a major issue for our
       | civilization, yet we ignore that we are sitting on top of many
       | millions of gallons of lava
        
         | godtoldmetodoit wrote:
         | We don't ignore it, it's just very expensive to drill with
         | current technology which limits the locations geo thermal can
         | profitably operate in.
        
         | [deleted]
        
         | kvetching wrote:
         | We just need a machine that will drill down to the magma,
         | simply install heat transfer rods, and we install a steam
         | turbine above it. Do this everywhere we have a coal / gas power
         | plant
        
           | lisper wrote:
           | What could possibly go wrong?
        
             | kvetching wrote:
             | Actually this is already being done in Iceland. "Geothermal
             | energy is a major source of energy in Iceland, with about
             | 25 percent of the country's electricity generated from
             | tapping the Earth's heat, according to the National Energy
             | Authority of Iceland. About 90 percent of Icelandic
             | households are heated with geothermal energy."
             | 
             | Source: https://www.livescience.com/57833-scientists-drill-
             | volcano-c....
        
               | lisper wrote:
               | Obviously geothermal is possible. Equally obvious: it is
               | not economically viable as a global replacement for
               | fossil fuels or it would have supplanted them already,
               | especially in Iceland.
        
               | djcapelis wrote:
               | It definitely has supplanted them in Iceland. Even the
               | most remote places that used to use oil are generally
               | switching to geothermal for heating. Converting the heat
               | to power isn't always worth it because the island has so
               | much plentiful hydro power. Fossil fuels account for
               | basically 0% of Icelandic power.
        
               | eesmith wrote:
               | FWIW, about 12.8% says
               | https://ourworldindata.org/energy/country/iceland#how-
               | much-o... . (Wikipedia says 15% at
               | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy_in_Iceland but that
               | uses a 10 year old source.)
        
               | MrDresden wrote:
               | Iceland also had the first magma powered electric
               | generator back in 2009. Was an accidental result of a
               | research drilling project though. Scishow made a video
               | about it back in 2014 [0]
               | 
               | [0]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jARDdWuFpK8
        
             | firebaze wrote:
             | Brave search "oxygen not included lava steam turbine".
        
         | [deleted]
        
       | mr_woozy wrote:
        
       | marcodiego wrote:
       | I can't be the only one to think volcanic eruptions are good
       | settings to test Venus rovers. Composition and pressure are still
       | different sure, but you gotta test these vehicles on Earth before
       | sending them.
        
       | itcrowd wrote:
       | The perfect time to recommend Fire of Love (2022):
       | https://imdb.com/title/tt16227014/
       | 
       | It a beautiful documentary with footage from the 60s-90s about a
       | volcanist couple who embarked on a mission to understand
       | volcanoes scientifically and (later) educate the public about
       | their dangers. Terrific cinematography!
       | 
       | Edit: I now see it has 99% critics review on rotten tomatoes (88%
       | from the audience) https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/fire_of_love
        
         | nebula8804 wrote:
         | This was literally promoted last night by one of my favorite
         | movie writers yesterday. Upon looking at listings all I see
         | were showtimes in major cities like NYC. New Jersey just has
         | mass market junk :/
        
       | thom wrote:
       | Twitter running Chirp and Icelandic volcanoes erupting, all is
       | right in the world, here in 2010.
        
       | MrDresden wrote:
       | There is also a live video feed[0] available from the coast guard
       | helicopter as it flew a reconnaissance flight over the eruption
       | with scientists today
       | 
       | edit: sadly the stream has been cut down to minutes from its
       | original hour+ length.
       | 
       | [0] https://www.ruv.is/frett/2022/08/03/beint-streymi-ur-
       | thyrlu-...
        
         | Melting_Harps wrote:
         | > edit: sadly the stream has been cut down to minutes from its
         | original hour+ length.
         | 
         | Damn, I opened this when you posted it and wanted to come back
         | to it when I had some down time later in the day and saw it's
         | been clipped; it was interesting to see how close all those
         | camera men got to the active site. I was on Maui in 2014 when
         | Kilauea happened on the Big Island and brought back to those
         | days.
         | 
         | It was pretty crazy because I was waiting on tons of equipment
         | coming in from the mainland which got delayed because of this,
         | even though the route was coming in from Oahu before departing
         | to Maui. Luckily this eruption doesn't seem like the one in
         | 2010 which would compound and already horrible flying
         | experience this summer.
         | 
         | I found a link on youtube with an alt live stream, its not as
         | lose but still shows a pretty good vantage point [1].
         | 
         | 0: https://edition.cnn.com/2014/10/28/us/hawaii-
         | volcano/index.h...
         | 
         | 1: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kF2-ecAINWg
        
         | gerdesj wrote:
         | That looks a bit close. When rock is bubbling, I think I'd
         | rather many miles away from it.
        
           | Kye wrote:
           | Perspective can be weird. They're probably a good distance
           | away.
        
           | borski wrote:
           | This is the same volcano that erupted last summer and moved
           | slowly enough that you could actually hike it. It was
           | stunning.
        
             | MrDresden wrote:
             | As a short and concise report on last year's eruption I
             | would recommend this 60 minutes[0] piece
             | 
             | [0]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1LI8Gcpawvo
        
               | dylan604 wrote:
               | When 60 minutes is the short and concise version, I'm
               | wondering if Peter Jackson has the full extended version
               | available
        
               | lostlogin wrote:
               | If anyone would like to import him, New Zealand would
               | appreciate it.
        
               | dylan604 wrote:
               | No no, he's perfectly fine right where he is. In fact, if
               | you chaps could do a better job of keeping him away from
               | the Tolkein estate, that would be lovely.
        
           | colechristensen wrote:
           | There are several different kinds of eruptions, some of them
           | you want to be many miles away from, others just far enough
           | not to be too hot.
           | 
           | It depends on the kinds of materials in the volcano, the
           | Iceland volcanoes aren't the ones that do the exploding and
           | pyroclastic flows, IIRC.
        
             | meheleventyone wrote:
             | In Iceland it really depends on whether the eruption is
             | under ice or not. Eyjafjallajokull's last eruption was
             | infamously explosive for example.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2022-08-03 23:01 UTC)