[HN Gopher] The worst dam idea: evaporating the Mediterranean to...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       The worst dam idea: evaporating the Mediterranean to power Europe
        
       Author : bandibus
       Score  : 95 points
       Date   : 2022-07-31 17:12 UTC (5 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (everythingisamazing.substack.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (everythingisamazing.substack.com)
        
       | AlbertCory wrote:
       | Someone with more engineering sense than I can debunk this:
       | 
       | The Baltic is dramatically less saline than the Atlantic. That's
       | why the Vasa [1] was so well-preserved after 300 years at the
       | bottom.
       | 
       | So could we not take advantage of that salinity difference,
       | somehow?
       | 
       | [1] https://www.vasamuseet.se/en
       | 
       | Edit: Every engineering student sees the movie of the Tacoma
       | Narrows bridge collapsing. To me, the Vasa is a much better
       | career lesson: Marketing dictating a stupid Engineering decision.
       | 
       | "Hey, let's put another gun deck on that thing! It'll be so much
       | more imposing."
        
         | mongol wrote:
         | It is not the salinity as such that protected Vasa, but the
         | absence of the ship worm, which does not like the Baltic brack
         | water.
        
           | AlbertCory wrote:
           | TIL. I did go to that museum and I thought that was what they
           | said.
           | 
           | What do you mean by "brack water"?
        
             | chucksmash wrote:
             | > Brackish water, sometimes termed brack water, is water
             | occurring in a natural environment that has more salinity
             | than freshwater, but not as much as seawater.
             | 
             | > Some seas and lakes are brackish. The Baltic Sea is a
             | brackish sea adjoining the North Sea.
             | 
             | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brackish_water
        
         | FiatLuxDave wrote:
         | We could. The technology you would use for this is
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Osmotic_power . Unfortunately, it
         | is not currently cost-effective.
         | 
         | The salinity of the Baltic varies but is generally below 13
         | g/kg, which is a lot less than the salinity of the Atlantic
         | (around 35 g/kg). This corresponds to an osmotic pressure
         | differential around 1.8 kJ/L (1.8 MPa). If you were to build a
         | dam which had a gravity pressure which matched this pressure
         | differential it would be about 180 m high. So, yes, there is
         | plenty of energy in that salinity difference, but getting it
         | out in a cost effective manner is an open problem.
        
           | AlbertCory wrote:
           | Excellent. Thanks!
        
         | jvdvegt wrote:
         | They use exactly this in De Afsluitdijk in The Netherlands [1],
         | which seems to use technology from redstack [2].
         | 
         | [1] https://www.rijkswaterstaat.nl/zakelijk/duurzame-
         | leefomgevin...
         | 
         | [2] https://redstack.nl/en/?
        
         | simonh wrote:
         | We beat you by over 80 years with the Mary Rose, although she
         | at least managed to get into battle before she went over.
        
         | caseysoftware wrote:
         | I visited the Vasa museum in late 2019 and it was stunning. Not
         | just how well it had been preserved but how few people died in
         | it.
         | 
         | They noted that one of the biggest contributors to its
         | preservation was simply the location: since it had barely left
         | the harbor, it was shielded from most storms and buried in mud
         | in relatively shallow water.
         | 
         | Even better, when it sank, the Vasa was still just a few
         | hundred feet from shore so only a few dozen people died instead
         | of the hundreds onboard.
        
       | ngcc_hk wrote:
       | If it is done can it easily for 1 country to threaten the whole
       | euro ... instead of nuclear bomb, we will bomb this dam. Giving
       | the whole ww1 he has experienced can he just believe all
       | countries are in it for peace. Also who will share the costs of
       | losing the sea and maintain it.
        
       | bandibus wrote:
       | The final part of a trilogy of stories I ran in my newsletter -
       | and since the first two were well-received on here a few months
       | back, and got me some generous & good advice on tightening them
       | up, I thought I'd push my luck a final time. Plus, this topic's
       | both wtf-barmy and perhaps timely, considering Europe's energy
       | supply issues right now.
        
       | nickdothutton wrote:
       | I get a feeling that the author may have a teeny-weeny
       | ideological axe to grind. A large underwater turbine with totally
       | predictable generation cycle might indeed be a useful thing for
       | Europe and north Africa.
        
         | bandibus wrote:
         | Hah. Not at all! If it sounds like that, I've misrepresented
         | myself - I agree with you here, and the Strait is the perfect
         | place to do it, using something like this:
         | https://www.orkney.com/news/orbital-grid
        
           | ethbr0 wrote:
           | It definitely sounds like that.
           | 
           | > _But - purely as an exercise in trying to answer
           | hilariously daft questions - how much would it cost to lower
           | the level of the sea?_
           | 
           | Never answered?
           | 
           | > _But this is far from the worst thing about Atlantropa._
           | 
           | > _It's alarming to look back just a century and realise just
           | how deeply baked and widely-disseminated these kinds of
           | racist assumptions were in Europe._
           | 
           | > _It's proper shivers-down-the-spine stuff._
           | 
           | > _Atlantropa may have been wildly unfeasible for countless
           | reasons, a perfect turducken of Nopes._
           | 
           | Which reasons?
           | 
           | I got to the end of the post and was still waiting for
           | content...
        
             | kelnos wrote:
             | > _Which reasons?_
             | 
             | The article notes that even just the dam in the Gibraltar
             | Strait (ignoring the others) would have required more
             | concrete than existed in the entire world at the time. I
             | think that single reason is enough.
        
       | [deleted]
        
       | wmil wrote:
       | Any thoughts on the idea to expand the Mediterranean with the
       | Sahara Sea idea?
       | 
       | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sahara_Sea
        
       | tomtomistaken wrote:
       | There are strong currents at work in the strait of Gibraltar.
       | Would be interesting to harness their energy in some way.
        
         | bandibus wrote:
         | Agreed. There's a tidal turbine off Orkney, the most powerful
         | in the world, that just went live:
         | https://www.orkney.com/news/orbital-grid It's powering 2,000
         | homes and an electrolyzer creating green hydrogen. A few of
         | those - or a few arrays of them- in the Strait might do
         | wonders.
        
         | moistly wrote:
         | Like an underwater turbine.
         | 
         | Japan is apparently going to give it a shot:
         | https://www.inputmag.com/tech/japan-kairyu-ocean-turbine-dee...
         | 
         | Looks like Scotland's is a roaring success:
         | https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-scotland-north-east-orkney-shetl...
         | 
         | No need to evaporate the sea.
        
           | zamalek wrote:
           | This also draws energy out of the sea, a net positive for
           | climate change mitigation.
        
       | dvh wrote:
       | Smaller scale project - Czech dam (the red lines are dams):
       | 
       | https://www.abclinuxu.cz/images/screenshots/7/3/242837-ceska...
        
         | rightbyte wrote:
         | "The Czech basin can be conveniently used to build a giant
         | reservoir"
         | 
         | I like his use of convenient. But the concept is quite
         | interesting, barring the practicality of flooding Prague and
         | half the country.
        
         | alexanderchr wrote:
         | I believe this project would greatly improve the capabilities
         | of the Czech Navy.
         | 
         | http://cz-fleet.info/index_en.htm
        
           | D-Coder wrote:
           | "At present, the Czech Republic is working on the design of
           | their own non-nuclear aircraft carriers. Planned to build at
           | least two aircraft carriers."
           | 
           | Neither Wikipedia nor a quick DDG have anything about this.
           | Fake site probably.
        
         | faebi wrote:
         | Wouldn't that take forever to fill up?
        
           | dvh wrote:
           | Approximately 100 years. Then it would produce 2 PWh of power
           | (300x average nuclear power plant). Volume 160x Three Gorges
           | Dam. More here: https://prehrada.hrach.eu/en.html
        
             | Youden wrote:
             | If it takes 100 years to fill the dam and emptying the dam
             | will generate 2PWh, then the expected average power is
             | 2.3GW. That's closer to 3 nuclear reactors.
        
               | dvh wrote:
               | You will not empty the dam. You need 100 years to move
               | water level 500m up, then you will use the current flow
               | of the Elbe but raised 500m up. That gives you the power
               | increase.
        
       | andix wrote:
       | The idea is part of a very problematic episode in European
       | history. But would the idea be really that bad?
        
       | labster wrote:
       | The Qattara depression portion of the project still seems worth
       | doing. While I'd prefer the freshwater flavored version, it's not
       | hard to imagine it turning into another Salton Sea as droughts
       | occur.
        
       | t_mann wrote:
       | > What was needed was a project so ludicrously ambitious, yet so
       | immeasurably beneficial to all the European powers, that it would
       | at last force them to put aside their differences and cooperate
       | 
       | Let's be honest, has that idea ever worked?
        
       | blacksqr wrote:
       | > What was needed was a project so ludicrously ambitious, yet so
       | immeasurably beneficial to all the European powers, that it would
       | at last force them to put aside their differences and cooperate
       | 
       | Interesting, so he was a sort of inverse Ozymandias.
        
       | 100k wrote:
       | Not mentioned in this article: In Philip K. Dick's alternative
       | history The Man in the High Castle, in which the Nazis and
       | Imperial Japan won World War II, the Nazis execute this plan and
       | drain the Mediterranean. As the author mentions, there wasn't
       | much care for what happened to the people living in Africa. In
       | Dick's book, the Nazis visited some unspeakable holocaust on
       | them.
        
         | throwaway49374 wrote:
        
           | CrazyStat wrote:
           | Why are multiple throwaways posting almost identical
           | comments?
        
         | throwawayasdfgf wrote:
        
           | CrazyStat wrote:
           | Why are multiple throwaways posting almost identical
           | comments?
        
       | almog wrote:
       | While not directly related, it reminded me of another plan (from
       | 1963), sponsored by the US to create an alternate to the Suez
       | Canal, through the Israeli Negev Desert using... 520 nuclear
       | bombs:
       | 
       | https://www.businessinsider.com/us-planned-suez-canal-altern...
        
         | metadat wrote:
         | Un-paywalled: https://archive.ph/muZg5
        
         | suzzer99 wrote:
         | They had a similar plan to blow a second Panama Canal through
         | the Darien Gap with nuclear bombs. Just batshit crazy stuff.
        
       | dukoid wrote:
       | With rising sea levels perhaps it might be an option to keep the
       | levels in the mediterranen? Seems at least more feasible than the
       | Norther European Enclosure Dam*
       | 
       | *)
       | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northern_European_Enclosure_Da...
        
         | Bronze_Colossus wrote:
         | Since parts of Northern Europe still experiences Post-glacial
         | rebound and will rise faster than the expected rise of the
         | ocean level I find this project unnecessary. (I am still a
         | sucker for megaprojects though)
        
           | Someone wrote:
           | On the other hand, parts of Western Europe also still
           | experience Post-glacial rebound and will drop, increasing the
           | effects of rising sea levels.
           | 
           | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Post-
           | glacial_rebound#Vertical_...:
           | 
           |  _"the post-glacial rebound of northern Great Britain (up to
           | 10 cm per century) is causing a corresponding downward
           | movement of the southern half of the island (up to 5 cm per
           | century)"_
           | 
           | IIRC, the Low Countries also are sinking because of post-
           | glacial rebound.
        
         | xyzzyz wrote:
         | The rise in sea levels is extremely slow at human lifetime
         | scale. We are looking at less than 1 meter (just over 3 feet)
         | by year 2100 in the worst case scenario analyses by IPCC. This
         | is not nearly enough to make Gibraltar power plant practical,
         | as it is on the order of magnitude of existing difference
         | between high and low tide.
        
       | hinkley wrote:
       | If global warming continues to raise sea level, it could well
       | become the case that such a project is undertaken but with the
       | goal of keeping the Mediterranean roughly where it is, which
       | would simplify changes necessary elsewhere to keep the Black Sea
       | a sea and keep harbors navigable.
       | 
       | Lowering the Mediterranean a few feet and running turbines at a
       | flow rate to counteract evaporation might work, especially since
       | evaporation and power usage track somewhat. Hot days evaporate
       | more water, and require more air conditioning. The volume of the
       | reservoir would allow quite a bit of buffer if you wanted to time
       | shift some of that usage, aiming for monthly or quarterly
       | averages instead of daily.
        
       | TacticalCoder wrote:
       | The Mediterranean sea is, to me, the most beautiful place on
       | earth. Be it mainland Spain (with, sadly, way too many concrete
       | all along the coast), France, Italy, Croatia, Greece, ... It's
       | just beautiful. Then the islands: Corsica, Sicily, Ibiza,
       | Formentera, ... It's heaven on earth.
       | 
       | I drive my kid to school on the french riviera, along the coast
       | and among the vineyards every day.
       | 
       | Famous poets and painters would go and settle there.
       | 
       | It requires a very special kind of a sad fuck to want to destroy
       | that.
        
         | bandibus wrote:
         | Couldnt agree more. (I grew up in Cyprus.) From what I could
         | tell, it didn't occur to Sorgel what effect the dams and
         | evaporation would have on sea-life, and on the coastal
         | economies depending on it. Probably catastrophic. But one thing
         | that was encouraging about the Orkney turbine mentioned
         | elsewhere in these comments: they ran a trial first, to see how
         | wildlife would be affected. Result: negligible impact. So a
         | modern-tech version that respects all that beauty does seem to
         | be possible - if mining the raw materials required to build it
         | is factored in, because that is a massive ongoing issue.
        
           | tomrod wrote:
           | I'm pretty sure he was a "change it all and we will make our
           | own opportunity" type of dreamer, per the article.
        
         | Dylan16807 wrote:
         | > It requires a very special kind of a sad fuck to want to
         | destroy that.
         | 
         | On the other hand it's recreating a different entirely natural
         | state the sea was once in, beautiful in its own way.
         | 
         | I'd still say it's wrong but I don't think it's a "special kind
         | of sad fuck". The status quo is not king.
        
         | zen_1 wrote:
         | Agreed, my childhood summers spent on the Egyptian North
         | Coast/Sahel are some of my favorite memories.
        
       | meroes wrote:
       | Something like this kind of drew me into geology. The inside
       | jacket of my intro textbook explained the Mediterranean used to
       | be damned naturally at Gibraltar or whatever the inlet is called
       | and that so much salt water evaporated there where miles deep
       | salt land features. Was instantly hooked
        
         | pawsforthought wrote:
         | This article links to another which discusses exactly that [1]
         | -- some geological event dammed the Mediterranean from the
         | Atlantic 6 million years ago, after which the sea mostly dried
         | out, then subsequently the entire thing refilled in the space
         | of a couple years in the Zanclean Megaflood (at least, there's
         | mounting evidence that it happened in one cataclysmic event).
         | First the western Mediterranean filled up to Sicily, then the
         | eastern med, via a 1500m (5000ft) high waterfall!
         | 
         | [1]: https://everythingisamazing.substack.com/p/in-search-of-a-
         | fl...
        
         | treeman79 wrote:
         | Epic XKCD comic on this topic.
         | 
         | https://blog.xkcd.com/2013/07/29/1190-time/
        
         | fractallyte wrote:
         | I'm sure I read about this in one of the later editions of
         | Principles of Physical Geology by Arthur Holmes...
        
         | [deleted]
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2022-07-31 23:01 UTC)